Next Article in Journal
Genetically Modified Micro-Organisms for Industrial Food Enzyme Production: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Purification of Bioactive Peptide with Antimicrobial Properties Produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/foods9030325
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems as a Strategy to Increase Functionality of Bioactive Compounds

by
Ariadna Gasa-Falcon
,
Isabel Odriozola-Serrano
,
Gemma Oms-Oliu
and
Olga Martín-Belloso
*
Department of Food Technology, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(3), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030325
Submission received: 24 December 2019 / Revised: 7 March 2020 / Accepted: 8 March 2020 / Published: 11 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nutraceuticals, Functional Foods, and Novel Foods)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acquisition of a healthy lifestyle through diet has driven the food manufacturing industry to produce new food products with high nutritional quality. In this sense, consumption of bioactive compounds has been associated with a decreased risk of suffering chronic diseases. Nonetheless, due to their low solubility in aqueous matrices, high instability in food products during processing and preparation as well as poor bioavailability, the use of such compounds is sometimes limited. Recent advancements in encapsulation and protection of bioactive compounds has opened new possibilities for the development of novel food products. In this direction, the present review is attempting to describe encapsulation achievements, with special attention to nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems, i.e., nanoemulsions, multi-layer emulsions and liposomes. Functionality of bioactive compounds is directly associated with their bioavailability, which in turn is governed by several complex processes, including the passage through the gastrointestinal tract and transport to epithelial cells. Therefore, an overview of recent research on the properties of these nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems with a strong impact on the functionality of bioactive compounds will be also provided. Nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems might be used as a potential option to enhance the solubility, stability, absorption and, ultimately, functionality of bioactive compounds. Several studies have been performed in this line, modifying the composition of the nanostructures, such as the lipid-type or surfactants. Overall, influencing factors and strategies to improve the efficacy of encapsulated bioactive compounds within nanostructures have been successfully identified. This knowledge can be used to design effective targeted nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems for bioactive compounds. However, there is still a lack of information on food interactions, toxicity and long-term consumption of such nanostructures.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that by 2020, chronic diseases will be responsible for nearly three-quarters of all deaths worldwide, including ischaemic heart disease, deaths due to stroke and diabetes [1]. The fact that eating habits are relevant in either the appearance or the prevention of these chronic illnesses provides food for thought. People’s awareness of nutrition habits is increasing and has derived into a growing demand for foodstuffs with specific functions for overall good health and well-being.
Not being synthesized by the human body, bioactive compounds need to be incorporated into our daily diet since they are involved in several biological processes, such as the regulation of gene expression in cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as intermediation in hormone metabolism [2]. In addition, they exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, as well as antibacterial properties, which have drawn the interest of the scientific community studying these compounds [3].
In an attempt to satisfy the consumer’s requests, the food industry is trying to use and incorporate these bioactive compounds within foodstuffs [4]. Nonetheless, they present several limitations, including low water solubility, stability and bioavailability, which can compromise successful incorporation and functionality. The common interest of both consumers and the food industry for healthier products has been translated into an in-depth search of tools in order to overcome these limitations [5]. Researchers have been exploring the possibilities for incorporating bioactive compounds into food and beverages as well as for strengthening their positive health benefits. In this sense, nanotechnology has been envisaged as a potential approach that offers several applications in the food field, such as animal feed, novel foods and food additives. Nanotechnology has been established as a key enabling technology (KET) by the European Commission because it facilitates forward-looking possibilities for the development of food innovative products [6]. Specifically, nanostructured delivery systems consist of tiny droplets within the nanometric range, with the proven ability to carry and protect bioactive compounds. So far, different types of carrier systems have been developed, including nanoemulsions [7], double emulsions [8], multi-layer emulsions [9], liposomes [10] and solid lipid nanoparticles [11], among others. These systems allow the solubilisation, encapsulation and protection of bioactive compounds, but also improve their stability under certain environments such as heat, extreme pH and gastrointestinal fluids [12]. Thus, delivery of bioactive compounds through the gastrointestinal tract is guaranteed and, consequently, their bioavailability and functionality are enhanced. The outstanding properties concerning these systems facilitate the incorporation of bioactive compounds to foodstuffs, thereby conferring an extra nutritional value.
This review will be focused on discussing the use of nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems for enhancing the functionality of lipophilic bioactive compounds.

2. Lipophilic Bioactive Compounds

In the last decade, there has been a significant growing interest toward the development of nutraceuticals, which are foodstuffs that provide health and medical benefits [13,14]. Therefore, it is very common in the food and beverage industry to extract bioactive compounds molecules from its original sources and purify them for several applications, including dietary supplements or food fortification [15]. Bioactive compounds are non-essential for human life, but they have been categorised as disease-prevention ingredients due to their antioxidant, anti-tumour, anti-mutagenic, anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. Numerous studies have proven these health benefits both in vitro (tissue culture studies) [16,17] and in vivo (animal and human intervention trials) [18,19]. These bioactive compounds are mainly found in fruits and vegetables, but also in legumes, nuts, herbs and spices, among others. According to some studies, the European population does not meet the daily recommended intake of fruits and vegetables, which has been set in 400 g/day [20,21]. In addition, special attention has been paid to lipophilic bioactive compounds (carotenoids, flavonoids and vitamins E, D and K), since their incorporation to aqueous-based food products is limited. Furthermore, these compounds are light, temperature and/or oxygen sensible, which can negatively affect their efficacy as health-related agents. Either manufacturing or storage of foodstuffs as well as the extreme conditions found through the digestive tract can lead to degradations of these lipophilic compounds [22]. For instance, high temperature during food processing or acidic environments during the stomach phase can lead to the transformation of β-carotene into oxidation products, such as carotenoid carbocation, which is indicative of compound degradation [23]. Besides that, digestive fluids are also aqueous, which can affect their transport throughout the gastrointestinal tract and the transfer to mixed micelles for further absorption. Thus, a combination of all these factors might imply the loss of lipophilic bioactive compounds and, consequently, compromise the intestine reach, absorption and postprandial delivery to target organs, meaning poor functionality. Nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems might help address these problems concerning bioactive compounds.

3. Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems

Research studies focused on nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems as a strategy to protect lipophilic bioactive compounds have extensively increased. A brief description of the main nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems for encapsulating such compounds, including nanoemulsions, multi-layer emulsions and liposomes (Figure 1), is outlined below.

3.1. Nanoemulsions

Nanoemulsions are oil-in-water emulsions containing nanometric-size oil droplets ranging from 50 to 500 nm [24]. The main components for nanoemulsions formation are oil (lipid phase) and water (aqueous phase). On one hand, lipophilic bioactive compounds are solubilized within the oil before the formation of nanoemulsions. Different oils haven been employed, including corn oil [25], essential oils [26] and medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) (Miglyol® 810 or Miglyol® 812) [7]. On the other hand, there are different components that can be incorporated within the aqueous phase, such as emulsifiers (Tweens, phospholipids, proteins), texture modifiers (sodium alginate, pectin, carrageenan), preservatives and/or antioxidants (parabens, tocopherols), among others. Both the lipid and aqueous phases are immiscible, so they need to be combined in order to disperse the lipid phase (oil droplets) within the aqueous phase (water surrounding oil droplets). For this, the presence of emulsifiers is important since they are surface-active compounds that are adsorbed at the oil–water interface of the droplets, thereby reducing the interfacial tension between both phases and assisting in the stabilisation of the system [27]. Their ability to adsorb at the oil–water interface is also subjected to the molecular structure of each emulsifier [28]. Finally, homogenization of both phases with all the components is an important process in order to form nanoemulsions. For this process, the use of high-energy (high-pressure homogenization, sonication) or low-energy methods (self-emulsification, phase inversion) is required [29]. High energy methods are widely employed for producing these systems, which consist of applying mechanical forces (shear, disruptive) in order to create small oil droplets through their break down [30]. Alternatively, low-energy methods consist of spontaneous emulsification by using the internal chemical energy of the system [31].
The final properties of nanoemulsions will be determined not only by the nature and characteristics of each component forming part of the system [25,32,33] but also by the fabrication employed for producing nanoemulsions [34].

3.2. Multi-Layer Emulsions

Multi-layer emulsions are oil-in-water emulsions with oil droplets covered by at least two layers of biopolymers that are electrostatically charged. Several stabilisers, including surfactants (lecithin, sodium dodecyl sulphate, Tween 20) and biopolymers (sodium alginate, pectin, chitosan, β-lactoglobulin) have been extensively used to produce multi-layer emulsions with different lipophilic bioactive compounds, such as lutein [35], resveratrol [9], curcumin [36] and β-carotene [37].
In general, a single-layer emulsion is firstly done, thereby homogenizing the lipid phase (oil containing lipophilic bioactive compounds) and the aqueous phase (charged surfactant or biopolymer). Then the layer-by-layer (LbL) method is used to produce several multilayers by placing biopolymers oppositely charged around the oil droplets.
It should be stated that fabrication of these emulsions is a delicate procedure as instability processes (e.g., bridging flocculation or depletion flocculation) occurs when there is either an excess or lack of polyelectrolytes [38]. In this sense, there are different strategies that can be employed to produce stable multi-layer emulsions: (1) the saturation method, to empirically determine (ζ-potential and/or particle size) the concentration of the biopolymers needed to cover the oil droplets; (2) the centrifugation method, to remove the excess non-adsorbed biopolymers by centrifuging; or (3) the filtration method, whereby the excess of non-adsorbed biopolymers is removed by membrane filtration.
When a suitable concentration of each polyelectrolyte is employed to form multi-layer emulsions, there are two types of stabilisation mechanisms that contribute to the equilibrium of the whole system. On one hand, steric stabilisation occurs when oil droplets are coated with biopolymers that provide a layer around them, which is thick enough to overcome attractive forces between droplets. On the other hand, charges of the stabilisers covering the oil droplets contribute to the electrostatic stabilisation, which avoids that the oil droplets come close to each other [39]. Apart from biopolymer concentration, the pH of the solution needs to be controlled during all stages of the preparation process, so that the biopolymers are charged enough to avoid destabilisation processes [38].
In the literature, multi-layer emulsions with two [36], three [9] and up to four layers [40] of biopolymers have been produced. The properties of multi-layer emulsions strongly depend on the characteristics of the biopolymers used to assemble the different layers. For instance, Mun and co-authors reported that the particle size of a bi-layer emulsion (Tween 20-chitosan) was affected by the chitosan’s degree of deacetylation (DDA), presenting lower particle sizes than those emulsions containing the chitosan with the lowest DDA [41].

3.3. Liposomes

Liposomes are spherical structures consisting of polar lipids, which have hydrophilic and lipophilic groups within the same molecule [10]. Hydrophobic tails of lipids interact with each other, thereby forming bilayer structures that have an aqueous interior and at the same time are surrounded in aqueous media. Therefore, hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds can be simultaneously encapsulated in the aqueous core and the phospholipid bilayer, respectively [42].
According to the number of phospholipid bilayers contained within each structure and the size of the liposome, they are classified as small unilamellar vesicles (single layer and <0.1 μm), large unilamellar vesicles (single layer and 0.1–1 μm) and multilamellar liposomes (several layers and >1 μm) [43]. Different lipids have been employed for liposome formation, including phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol and soybean lecithin. Methods to produce liposomes are based on the use of organic solvents, such as film hydration, ethanol injection and reverse-phase evaporation However, liposomes prepared with these techniques normally present large particle sizes and a broad size distribution. The incorporation of an additional step (extrusion, sonication or microfluidization) might be used as an efficient strategy to produce liposomes with small particle size and with high encapsulation capacity [44]. Solvent-free methods, such as pH-driven [45] and heating-hydrated components from liposomes in the presence of glycerol [46], are alternatives that can be used for liposome formation and further food application. However, this type of nanostructures is difficult to scale up due to the several steps needed for the preparation. Besides, liposome fabrication techniques have a considerable influence on the encapsulation efficiency of bioactive compounds. Dehydration/rehydration techniques have shown high efficiency in incorporating lipophilic bioactive compounds, such as retinol [47], while a significant decrease on encapsulation efficiency of resveratrol in liposomes from 97% to 44% was observed when they were prepared by the extrusion technique and sonication, respectively [48].
Recently, LbL techniques employed in emulsions have also been used for coating liposomes with different biopolymers, such as chitosan, pectin and carrageenan [49]. Another type of liposome is a niosome, which is formulated with non-ionic emulsifiers such as Span 40, Tween 20 or Tween 40. They are often chosen over liposomes because they are more stable and economic. However, there are only a few studies available on the formulation of niosomes containing lipophilic bioactive compounds [50].

4. Enhancing Functionality of Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems

The successful delivery of encapsulated lipophilic bioactive compounds might be related to several factors, including the susceptibility of these nanostructures to undergo physical alteration when they are incorporated into foodstuffs or subjected to an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. At the same time, effective nanostructures as delivery systems might be associated with their stability and digestibility, as well as bioaccessibility and absorption of health-related compounds. Thus, focusing research on studying all these processes is of great importance in order to cope with problems that might affect the overall functionality of nanostructures.

4.1. Enhancing Stability of Lipophilic Bioactive Compounds

Food processing and food matrix characteristics involve subjecting nanostructures to external environments that can negatively affect their integrity. To simulate these situations, nanostructures are normally exposed to different external or storing conditions (pH, ionic strength, light, temperature), followed by a monitorization of compound stability and/or physical stability of the system. Different studies about nanostructures under these conditions are described in Table 1.
On one hand, a high content of the lipophilic bioactive compound after exposure to external environments is important so as to maintain an overall functionality of the system. The principal advantage of nanostructured systems is their nanometric size, meaning that oil droplets have a large surface area. However, they are highly reactive with the surrounding media, and thus significant degradation of the encapsulated compound might occur. Teo and co-authors reported that the lutein degradation rate was strongly associated with the particle size of nanoemulsions, being higher as their particle size decreased from 147.3 nm to 68.8 nm [51]. Stabilisers also play a fundamental role in the stability of the encapsulated compound because they are deposited at the interface, thereby covering the oil droplets that have the lipophilic compound solubilised. It was reported a faster β-carotene degradation in nanoemulsions stabilised with Tween 20 than those with β-lactoglobulin [52]. Opposite results were observed by Young et al. [53], reporting a higher curcumin content in emulsions containing Tween 20 (>97.5%) compared to those containing whey protein (WPI) (<89.5%). The electrical charge of oil droplets, which is mainly attributed to the stabilisers employed to formulate nanostructures, might have a direct impact on the stability of the compounds. Negatively charged oil droplets (anionic particles) are easily reactive to metal ions present in the aqueous phase, leading to degradation processes of the encapsulated compounds.
Another way to retard encapsulated lipophilic compound degradation is to strengthen the physical barrier by covering the oil droplets with several stabiliser layers [35]. For instance, it was observed that adding a layer of chitosan to lecithin-covered oil particles containing citral (multilayer emulsions) was effective to retain a twofold amount of citral compared to the lecithin emulsions (single layer emulsions) after four weeks of storage (25 °C) [54]. Accordingly, other authors found higher retention of β-carotene in multilayer emulsions (WPI-gum arabic) than in single layer emulsions (WPI) at all the storage temperatures tested (25 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C) during 70 days of storage [55]. Similarly, applying a coating of pectin in the liposomes resulted in higher retention of resveratrol than in uncoated liposomes, avoiding oxidation and hydrolyzation of phospholipids processes and, therefore, leakage of encapsulated resveratrol [56]. Finally, the addition of water-soluble antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid, or oil-soluble antioxidants like coenzyme Q10, can delay the degradation of the encapsulated compounds in nanostructured systems by scavenging free radicals [57,58]. Some of the stabilisers employed in nanostructured systems production, including proteins and some biopolymers, have antioxidant capacity. Accordingly, it was suggested that the antioxidant capacity of guar gum used to formulate β-carotene-enriched liposomes contributed to avoid β-carotene degradation, leading to values of retention ≥88% after 95 days under refrigeration conditions [59].
On the other hand, instability processes occurring in nanostructures can be associated with a breakdown of the structure, resulting in a no longer encapsulation of lipophilic compounds. Consequently, unprotected compounds would be more susceptible to undergoing degradation processes. Therefore, the physical stability of nanostructured systems needs to be evaluated under different situations in order to understand their behaviour, so as to design stable systems. The nanometric size of nanostructured systems is associated with a reduction in the gravity force and Brownian motion, as well as with the prevention of destabilisation processes (flocculation, coalescence, sedimentation, creaming). Lee and co-authors observed that emulsions with a low particle size (≈66 nm) had better stability under different pH conditions (3–8), ionic strength (0–500 mM), thermal treatment (30–90 °C) and freezing/thawing (−4 °C, 48 h followed by 25 °C, 6 h) [60]. However, physical stability also lies on the composition of the nanostructures. Artiga-Artigas et al. [25] observed that the physical stability of curcumin-enriched nanoemulsions stabilised with lecithin strongly depended on the concentration of the emulsifier used, being those nanoemulsions containing concentrations over 1% the most stable emulsion. In the case of sucrose monopalmitate emulsions, they presented destabilisation processes (clarification, sedimentation, flocculation and coalescence) just hours after preparation. Because of the numerous layers deposited around the droplets, multi-layer emulsions might improve physical stability over a wide range of conditions. The physical stability of emulsions subjected to ionic strength changes (0–500 mM NaCl) was improved when they were covered with two (sodium dodecyl sulphate-chitosan) and three layers (sodium dodecyl sulphate-chitosan-pectin membranes) [61]. Another investigation concluded that the physical stability of multi-layer emulsions at different heat treatments highly depended on the biopolymer type employed for formulating these systems. Specifically, secondary emulsions containing lactoferrin-alginate were prone to droplet aggregation at temperatures over 60 °C, while droplet size remained unchanged up to temperatures of 90 °C when they contained lactoferrin-pectin (high and low methoxyl). Authors attributed these differences to the branches that pectin has, which would have provided both steric and electrostatic stabilisation [62].
Table
Table 1. Recent studies about stability of nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems under different stressing conditions.
Table 1. Recent studies about stability of nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems under different stressing conditions.
Lipophilic CompoundMaterialsPreparation MethodStressing ConditionsMain FindingsReferences
NanoemulsionsCurcuminLipid phase: corn oil
Emulsifier: Tween 20, lecithin and sucrose monopalmitate		MFStorage: 86 days at 25 °CLecithin-stabilised nanoemulsions were the most stable, while the rest undergone destabilisation processes after 24 h preparation.[25]
ErgocalciferolLipid phase: soybean oil
Emulsifier: modified lecithin (ML), sodium caseinate (SC), decaglycerol monooleate (MO-7S)		HPHpH conditions: 2–8
Ionic strength: 0–500 mM NaCl
Thermal treatment: 80, 100 and 120 °C
Dark storage 25 °C and 55 °C.		Physical stability depended on the emulsifier type. Stability of ergocalciferol in emulsion system decreased in order of ML>MO-7S≫SC during storage (55 °C for 30 days).[63]
Vitamin ELipid phase: SCT, MCT and LCT
Emulsifier: Tween 80		LEMIonic strength: 0–500 mM NaCl
pH: 2–8.5
Thermal treatment: 30–90 °C
Storage: light/dark at 4, 25 and 40 °C		Nanoemulsions were physically stable at high temperature (≈90 °C), high ionic strength (≈500 mM) and long-term storage (60 days) under light and dark conditions (4–40 °C)[64]
β-caroteneLipid phase: soybean oil
Emulsifier: Ulva fasciata (UFP)		MFThermal treatment: 70,80, 90 and 100 °C
pH: 3–7
α-tocopherol: 0–500 mg/kg
EDTA: 0–500µL/L		β-carotene was highly sensitive to acidic conditions and extreme temperatures. Addition of EDTA or α-tocopherol increased the stability of β-carotene[65]
Multi-layer emulsionsAstaxanthinLipid phase: flaxseed oil
Coatings composition: Q-naturale-pectin-chitosan		LbLThermal treatment: 20, 30, 50 and 80 °C
Ionic strength: 50–1000 mM NaCl
pH: 2–8
Storage: quantification of astaxanthin for 15 days.		Multi-layer-coatings improved astaxanthin stability during storage, as well as physical stability at elevated ionic strengths and temperatures.[66]
β-caroteneLipid phase: corn oil
Coatings composition: lactoferrin-alginate-ε-poly-l-lysine		LbLpH conditions: 2–11
Ionic strength: 0–500 mM NaCl
Thermal treatment: 30–90 °C		β-carotene content decreased only 40% when emulsions were subjected at temperatures ≤70 °C, in acidic conditions and below 0.3 M NaCl.[37]
LiposomesResveratrolLipid phase: phospholipid, cholesterol
Coatings: low and high methoxy pectin		FDpH conditions: 3, 5 and 7.4
Ionic strength: 0–200 mM NaCl
Thermal treatment: 4 and 25 °C for 7 weeks		Low methoxy pectin improved physical stability of liposomes as well as resveratrol retention under different stress conditions.[56]
CurcuminLipid phase: phosphatidylcholine (98.1%) and lysophosphatidylcholine (0.7%)
Modifier: Pluronic F127, F87 and P85		TFE + DHPMpH conditions: 7.4, 8, 10 and 12
Thermal stability: 80 °C		Adding pluronics improved thermal and pH stability of liposomes.[67]
SCT: short-chain triglycerides; MCT: medium-chain triglycerides; LCT: long-chain triglycerides; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; DTA, MF: microfluidizer; HPH: high pressure homogenizer; LEM: low-energy method (emulsion phase inversion: catastrophic phase inversion); LbL: layer-by-layer technique; FD: film dispersion method; TFE: thin film evaporation; DHPM: dynamic high pressure microfluidization.

4.2. Enhancing Lipid Digestibility and In Vitro Bioaccessibility of Lipophilic Bioactive Compounds

Lipids present in nanostructured systems are important components because their hydrolysis will affect the release of encapsulated lipophilic compounds and, therefore, its bioaccessibility. Lipid digestion occurs mainly during the intestinal phase and consists of the hydrolysis of oil droplets, which produces free fatty acids, diacylglycerols and monoacylglycerols [68,69]. These products together with bile salts and other digestion components are responsible for producing mixed micelles, which incorporate and solubilise the released lipophilic bioactive compounds for further absorption [70,71]. Thus, comprehension about bioaccessibility of lipophilic bioactive compounds requires knowledge about the lipid digestion of the nanostructured systems.
Different factors related to nanostructures might influence on lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility, including their physicochemical properties and composition (Table 2). As a general rule, emulsions with an initial small particle size present a higher lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility compared with emulsions with larger particle sizes [72]. However, Lee et al. [60] observed that free fatty acids release was slightly higher in emulsions with a high particle size whereas no major differences in lipid digestibility between nanoemulsions (200 nm) and emulsions (10,000 nm) were found in another investigation [73]. These contradictory results might be related to the interfacial properties of the nanostructured systems, which in turn define their physicochemical properties. Furthermore, these properties might be associated with the susceptibility of nanostructures to undergo physical changes when they are subjected to an in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Specifically, nanostructured systems might be destabilised along the GIT because of the pH conditions during the different digestion stages, as well as the presence of salts and enzymes [74]. All these changes modify the initial properties of nanostructured systems and could probably affect lipid digestion [75] and, therefore, the bioaccessibility of the encapsulated compounds. In a recent study, it was observed that nanoemulsions stabilised with different emulsifiers (Tween 20, lecithin, sodium caseinate and sucrose palmitate) and concentrations (2%, 4% and 8%) behaved differently during lipid digestion, but a similar final lipid digestibility was obtained regardless of the composition of the nanoemulsions. However, the bioaccessibility results were strongly influenced by the emulsifier nature rather than by the lipid digestibility results, obtaining the higher β-carotene bioaccessibility in lecithin-stabilised nanoemulsions (23.5%) [76]. Similarly, it was reported that the highest vitamin E bioaccessibility was achieved when adding phospholipids to intestinal fluids [77]. Mixed micelles are composed of bile salts, phospholipids from intestinal fluids as well as lipid digestion products from enzyme action during the intestinal phase. The fact that phospholipids were present, either in nanoemulsions [76] or in intestinal fluids [77], would have contributed to the formation of mixed micelles and therefore increase their solubilisation capacity.
Nanostructures formulated with protein-based emulsifiers tend to present values of lipid digestibility similar [76] or even higher [78] compared to other emulsifiers, but poor bioaccessibility of the encapsulated compounds. Indeed, proteins are known to form complexes with some lipophilic compounds such as carotenoids, thereby promoting aggregation and precipitation of mixed micelles [79]. Poor digestibility has also been associated with the low stability of nanostructured systems along the GIT. If these systems became highly unstable and their particle size increase, the oil droplet surface exposed to enzymes would be lower, leading to low digestibility and bioaccessibility [75,80]. In this sense, biopolymers, such as mandarin fibre, modified starch or corn fibre (texturizing/gelling agents), can be added to emulsions in order to increase the stability of these systems under digestive conditions and, therefore, increase both the lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility of the encapsulated compounds [81,82,83]. An increase in lipid digestibility in protein-stabilised nanoemulsions containing dietary fibre has also been observed, thereby preventing droplet aggregation during in vitro GIT digestion, maintaining the integrity of the system, and thus ensuring lipase could easily access the oil droplets [84,85]. On the contrary, it was observed that the initial rate of lipid digestion and the final amount of free fatty acids (%FFA) release was reduced when emulsions contained pectin (0.5%). This behaviour was explained because biopolymers can interact with calcium ions, reducing diffusion processes essential for complete lipid digestion. Alternatively, biopolymers might increase the thickness of the interfacial layer covering the oil droplets, thereby preventing their hydrolysation [86].
Biopolymers, including pectin, alginate and chitosan, can be used to assemble the different layers that cover the oil droplets of nanostructures [87,88,89]. However, there is controversy about whether biopolymer layers have a negative or positive effect on the bioaccessibility of the encapsulated compounds. Some authors have observed no significant correlation between the number of layers and lipid digestibility [40,90]. Silva and co-workers reported a similar total release in free fatty acids after in vitro dynamic digestion for curcumin-loaded nanoemulsions (WPI) (96.14%) and multilayer nanoemulsions (WPI–chitosan) (95.52%) [36]. Nonetheless, a recent study reported that tertiary emulsions (lactoferrin/alginate/ε-poly-L-lysine) presented significantly higher β-carotene bioaccessibility (70.1%) compared to primary (30.2%) and secondary emulsions (35.26%) [37]. On the contrary, other authors have suggested that the deposition of extra layers at the droplets interface might decrease free fatty acids release during lipid digestion [89,91]. Less free fatty acids were released in secondary emulsions (lecithin–chitosan) compared with primary emulsions (chitosan) [92]. Accordingly, multi-layer emulsions formed with chitosan and soy protein isolate (SPI) presented a lower amount of free fatty acids (87.9%) than multi-layer emulsions prepared with alginate and SPI (104.1%) [93]. Therefore, using chitosan in nanostructured systems can negatively affect lipid digestion. Nonetheless, the deposition of a chitosan layer around liposomes (chitosomes) would have controlled the release of encapsulated carotenoids during GIT, favouring its bioaccessibility [94].
Table
Table 2. Recent studies about in vitro lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility of encapsulated lipophilic bioactive compounds in nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems.
Table 2. Recent studies about in vitro lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility of encapsulated lipophilic bioactive compounds in nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems.
Lipophilic CompoundMaterialsGastrointestinal ModelMain FindingsReferences
Nanoemulsionsβ-caroteneLipid phase: corn oil
Emulsifier: Tween 20		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Lipid digestibility and β-carotene bioaccessibility increased from 34% up to 59% with decreasing particle size of emulsions.[72]
CurcuminLipid phase: corn oil
Emulsifier: Tween 20, SDS or DTAB		Dynamic in vitro gastro-intestinal model (TIM)Behaviour of nanoemulsions during in vitro digestion depended on the charge of the emulsifier[95]
Vitamin D3Lipid phase: MCT, corn oil, fish oil, mineral oil, or orange oil
Emulsifier: Q-Naturale		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Long chain triglycerides (corn oil and fish oil) were most effective at increasing vitamin bioaccessibility (≈80%).[7]
DHA algae oilLipid phase: DHA algae oil
Emulsifier: Tween 40, sodium caseinate, soya lecithin		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Encapsulated DHA in nanoemulsions showed higher FFA release (40%–50%) compared to bulk DHA (≈20%).[96]
Multilayer emulsionsFish oilLipid phase: fish oil
Layers assembly: Citrem–chitosan–alginate		Dynamic in vitro gastro-intestinal model (TIM)Lipid digestion rate was decreased with multilayer coating[91]
CarotenoidsLipid phase: MCT oil
Layers assembly: soy protein isolate-alginate-chitosan		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Alginate coating had no effect on lipid digestibility (≈100%) and bioaccessibility of carotenoids (≈11%).[93]
CurcuminLipid phase: MCT oil
Layers assembly: WPI–chitosan		Dynamic in vitro gastro-intestinal model (TIM)The deposition of a chitosan layer did not affect lipid digestion (≈96%), but increased curcumin bioaccessibility (37.2%) compared to nanoemulsions (29.8%).[36]
LiposomesCurcuminLipid phase: cholesterol, phospholipid
Modifiers: Pluronic F127, F87 and P85		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Curcumin loaded in pluronic-modified liposomes possessed increased bioaccessibility from 26.9% up to 43.3%.[67]
CurcuminLipid phase: phosphatidylcholine and α-phosphatidic acid
Coating composition: chitosan		Static in vitro gastrointestinal tract (GIT)Uncoated and coated liposomes presented similar results in curcumin bioaccessibility (≈70%).[97]
Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS); dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB); MCT: medium chain triglyceride oils; WPI: whey protein isolate; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid.
Other contributors or suppressor factors of lipid digestibility and bioaccessibility have been studied, including the chain length and degree of unsaturation of lipids used for nanostructure production. In general, no significant differences have been reported in the extent of lipid digestion for nanoemulsions containing long-chain triglycerides (LCT) or medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) [52,98]. Conversely, a higher rate and extent of lipid digestion as well as bioaccessibility was reported for LCT–vitamin E emulsions in comparison with MCT–vitamin E emulsions [99]. A recent study reported that vitamin D3-loaded nanoemulsions containing monounsaturated fatty acids (corn oil) were digested quicker than those oils containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (flaxseed and fish oil), which was explained by the conformation that the polyunsaturated fatty acids can adopt, thereby restricting enzyme action. Moreover, vitamin D3 bioaccessibility was higher in nanoemulsions formulated with corn oil (78%) than those formed with the rest of the oils (≈43%) [100]. Similarly, liposomes from phospholipids derived from milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) showed a lower free fatty acids release compared to those derived from soybean, which was explained because of the higher amount of saturated fatty acids that MFGM contained [101].
Finally, bioaccessibility of the encapsulated compounds can also be determined by the properties of the lipophilic compound. For instance, the intestinal release of different carotenoids loaded in liposomes changed depending on the type of carotenoid: lutein and β-carotene were released at a slower rate than lycopene and canthaxanthin [102]. This study concluded that polar carotenoids with a perpendicular orientation within the phospholipid bilayer of liposomes (i.e., lutein and β-carotene) would have favoured the carotenoid transfer to mixed micelles for further absorption.

4.3. Enhancing Absorption of Lipophilic Bioactive Compounds in Epithelial Cells

There are several lines of evidence to conclude that lipid-based nanostructures might be potential delivery systems for bioactive compounds. However, the efficacy of these bioactive compounds is directly associated with their bioavailability, which is the fraction of the bioactive compound that reaches the systemic circulation. Bioavailability of compounds involves several steps, including their release from the matrix, solubilisation within mixed micelles, permeability, absorption and secretion to the blood system [103]. A critical step of absorption is permeability (or cellular uptake), which can be defined as the lipophilic bioactive compound amount that enters within epithelial cells for later passage to bloodstream and target organs.
Before carrying absorption assays and after digestion processes, it is important to determine the cytotoxicity of the nanostructured systems so as not to compromise the survival of cells during tissue culture studies. Sadhukha and co-workers investigated the cytotoxicity of the digested nanoemulsions, which were composed by pellets, oil droplets and an aqueous fraction, the latter one being the most important part of the digesta since it has solubilised the lipophilic compound (micellar fraction). Surprisingly, the aqueous fraction was the most toxic to cells, which was explained by the free fatty acids generated during in vitro GIT digestion [104]. Besides that, other hydrophilic components from nanostructured systems, such as emulsifiers, have also been reported to affect the viability of cells [105,106]. Both studies analysed the cytotoxicity of several non-ionic emulsifiers in Caco-2 cells using the diphenyltetrazolium bromide test (MTT) and lactate dehydrogenase test (LDH). Polyethene glycols (Tweens and Labrasol) were more toxic in a dependent manner than polyethene glycols, being those with the highest HLB (Tween 20 and 60) the most toxic.
Many lines of evidence have demonstrated that the use of differentiated monolayers (Caco-2 and Caco-2/HT29-MTX cocultures) with tight junctions best represent the morpho-functional features of the intestinal barrier to model the absorption of lipophilic bioactive compound in epithelial cells [107]. This process consists of applying the digested sample at a suitable concentration in the apical compartment and incubate for at least 2 h. Finally, fractions from the apical (upper chamber), cell monolayer (in-between chamber) and basolateral compartment (lower chamber) are collected and analysed.
Numerous studies have investigated which properties of nanostructures might have a major influence on absorption of encapsulated compounds in tissue culture studies (Table 3). For instance, Andar et al. [108] observed a higher cellular uptake in Caco-2 cells for liposomes with small particle sizes (between 40 and 73 nm) compared to larger sizes (between 97 and 277 nm). Similarly, nanoemulsions exhibited a higher cellular uptake of lutein as their particle size diminished from 147.3 to 68.8 nm (147.3 nm) [51]. A great permeation through the cell monolayer as well as the large surface area would explain the high cell absorption in nanostructured delivery systems with low particle sizes.
Interfacial properties also have a strong influence on cellular uptake and absorption processes. In this sense, a recent study reported that the cellular uptake in Caco-2 cells of astaxanthin-loaded liposomes was improved when liposomes were formulated with 70% phosphatidylcholine [109]. On the other hand, another study described that cellular uptake of β-carotene in undifferentiated gastrointestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2 cells) depended on the emulsifier type added to the nanoemulsions rather than on the initial particle size of the nanoemulsions [110]. Investigations about different emulsifiers and combinations in oil-in-water emulsions concluded that they had a strong influence on the cellular uptake of carotenoids by the HT-29 cells. In this sense, oil-in-water emulsions formulated with a combination of whey protein (Biozate) and lecithin or sucrose laurate (L-1695) enhanced more than threefold the cellular uptake of lutein and astaxanthin, respectively [111,112]. Since the interfacial properties of the nanostructured systems govern the cellular uptake, a positive charge of the multi-layer emulsions containing chitosan would have increased the uptake efficiency compared to those containing WPI, which had a negative charge [36]. Hydrophilic polyelectrolytes, such as chitosan, can enhance the transport of these systems through Caco-2 cells via specific interaction between the nanostructured systems and the intestinal epithelium. Lipid composition is another parameter that might have a substantial influence on the permeability of lipophilic compounds. The impact of lipid phase-type (MCT, medium-chain triglycerides; and LCT, long-chain triglycerides) on bioavailability of vitamin E-encapsulated in quillaja saponin emulsions was investigated and it was concluded that LCT emulsions presented higher bioavailability (11.7%) than MCT emulsions (4.3%) [113]. Opposite results were reported by Liu and co-authors, presenting a higher permeability coefficient of pterostilbene across the cell monolayer in those nanoemulsions containing MCT (8.21 × 10−6 cm s −1) compared to those with LCT (≈5.10 × 10−6 cm s−1) [114].
Co-culturing Caco-2 cells with HT-29MTX adds a further layer of mucus complexity to more closely resemble the in vivo environment [115], but reduces permeability rates, which may hamper compound detection. Accordingly, a lower permeability of β-carotene from liposomes was reported using an in vitro, 21 days differentiated co-culture model with Caco-2/HT29-MTX compared to 21 days differentiated Caco-2 cells [116]. Interaction with the mucus produced by the Caco-2/HT29-MTX cell line reduces the permeability of mucoadhesive lipophilic molecules or large molecules due to steric blocking [117]. Detection of the target compound after absorption experiments by determining their bioactivity using other cells is an alternative that it has been used by Sabouri et al. [118].
Table
Table 3. Recent in vitro studies about different nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems encapsulating lipophilic bioactive compounds in epithelial cells.
Table 3. Recent in vitro studies about different nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems encapsulating lipophilic bioactive compounds in epithelial cells.
Lipophilic CompoundCompositionIn Vitro GIT DigestionEpithelial CellsMain FindingsReferences
NanoemulsionsConjugated linoleic acid (CLA)Lipid phase: Soybean oil (14% v/v)
Emulsifier: Soy protein isolate (4% v/v)		YesDifferentiated Caco-2 cellsNo significant differences on CLA bioavailability for all emulsion treatments[119]
CurcuminLipid phase: soy oil (40% v/v)
Emulsifier: Tween 20 (4% v/v) or Poloxamer 407 (4% v/v)		NoDifferentiated Caco-2 cellsCurcumin uptake was significantly affected by the type of interface, being higher when emulsions were stabilised with Poloxamer 407.[120]
β-caroteneLipid phase: sunflower oil (10% w/w)
Emulsifier (1% w/w): whey protein isolate (WPI), sodium caseinate (SCN) and Tween 80 (TW80).		YesUndifferentiated Caco-2 cellsSodium caseinate-stabilised emulsion showed the highest cellular uptake of β-carotene, followed by TW80- and WPI-stabilised emulsions.[110]
Vitamin DLipid phase: canola oil (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5% w/v)
Emulsifier: pea protein (1, 5, 10% w/v)		NoDifferentiated Caco-2 cellsCellular uptake was higher for small sized nanoemulsions (233 nm) and protein-based-nanoemulsions.[121]
Multilayer emulsionsCurcuminLipid phase: medium chain triglycerides (MCT) (10% w/w)
Emulsifier: whey protein isolate (WPI) (1.5% w/w)
Coating composition: chitosan		Nodifferentiated Caco-2 cellsChitosan layer significantly increased the apparent permeability coefficient of curcumin through Caco-2 cells by 1.55-folds.[36]
LiposomesEpigallocatechin-3-gallateLipid phase: soybean oil (7%)
Emulsifier: sodium caseinate (0.35%)
Stabiliser: high methoxyl pectin (0, 0.45%)		NoDifferentiated Caco-2 cells and coculture Caco-2/HT29-MTXMucus layer was associated with a lower recovery of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate after uptake experiments[116]
CurcuminLipid phase: phospholipid, cholesterol
Emulsifier: Tween 80		NoUndifferentiated Caco-2 cellsCurcumin loaded in nanoliposomes exhibited lower curcumin cellular uptake than free curcumin[122]
AstaxanthinLipid phase: soybean with phosphatidylcholine (PC)NoDifferentiated Caco-2 cellsCellular uptake of astaxanthin-loaded liposomes containing 70% PC was significantly higher than that of 23% PC-containing liposomes[109]

5. Application of Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems

Functional foods are defined as food products that have been fortified or enriched with compounds that provide health benefits. Because of the promising properties that nanostructured systems offer, they can be applied in several foods either in a dry/solid or liquid form to produce functional foods.
Nanostructured systems can be transformed into a dehydrated or solid state by spray-drying or freeze-drying techniques. Both processes consist of drying the product so as to obtain a powder with the encapsulated and entrapped compound of interest. In spray drying, water is evaporated by using hot air, while in freeze drying samples are frozen and then removing the liquid by sublimation under a vacuum [123]. One study obtained a lycopene powder through spray drying for further application within cakes. As a result, a pigmented cake was obtained, indicating that lycopene was released from the powder during cake preparation and coloured the dough homogenously [124]. Other authors have found evidence on using freeze drying to encapsulate bioactive compounds for an efficient food functionality. In this sense, yogurt fortified with freeze-dried capsules containing carotenoids and polyphenols exhibited a high retention of both bioactive. Furthermore, good acceptability scores in terms of colour and appearance were obtained for fortified yogurts [125].
Alternatively, nanostructured systems can be incorporated into foodstuffs either as such (beverages) or as edible coatings (fruits and vegetables). On one hand, Marsanasco et al. [126] incorporated both vitamin E- and vitamin C-enriched liposomes to an orange juice and observed that the antioxidant activity of both vitamins was protected before and after pasteurisation treatments. Furthermore, orange juice organoleptic properties were not altered, and its microbial stability was improved for over a month. On the other hand, edible coatings consist of a thin layer of nanostructured emulsion systems that are applied to foods by different techniques, such as spraying, dipping and electrospraying. This layer can act as a physical barrier and block oxygen, moisture and solute movement, without affecting the properties of the food [127]. For instance, multi-layered emulsions have been used as edible coatings to provide a better quality and visual appearance to strawberries [128]. Nanoemulsions containing eugenol and Aloe vera were also applied to shrimps, resulting in a quality improvement of this food product (drip loss, colour changes, textural disintegration and deterioration was reduced) as well as in a retardation of oxidative reactions during seven days of storage [129]. In addition, nanostructured systems are a feasible approach to extend the shelf life of food as well as add extra nutritional value. The microbial stability of low-fat cheese was improved, and additional nutritional characteristics were provided to the food product by applying a nanoemulsion-based edible coating, carrying oregano essential oil and mandarin fibre [26].

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Prospects

Bioactive compounds are health-related compounds of interest not only because they are involved in biological processes but also for their specific functions for health and well-being. It is widely recognized that nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems are a feasible option to encapsulate and improve the functionality of such lipophilic bioactive compounds. At the same time, the successful delivery of bioactive compounds might be associated with the stability and digestibility of nanostructured systems, as well as bioaccessibility and absorption. Different characteristics from nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems can either strengthen or reduce their functionality, including interfacial properties of and/or carrier oil-type, among others.
However, most of the in vitro models used for studying delivery of encapsulated compounds within nanostructured systems do not include the large intestine step, where interaction with microbiota occurs. The need for accurate in vitro methods to study digestion and fermentation processes has become increasingly important given the recently recognised role of the large intestine in vital functions, nutrition and gut health. In addition, most of these nanostructures have only been developed at the scale laboratory level, which limits its extrapolation to in vivo studies. Further in vivo studies (animal tests) are needed not only to validate the results obtained from in vitro experiments but also to obtain information prior to embarking on intervention trials with human subjects.
Another latent concern is the lack of information about possible interactions between nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems and other food components, as well as their accumulation, toxicity and long-term consumption. Even though nanostructured delivery systems have been associated with the quality, safety and functionality enhancement of encapsulated bioactive compounds, there is a global concern regarding both the toxicological and regulation aspects when these systems are applied to foodstuffs and then consumed. Now that the food and beverage industry is continuously developing novel food products in which nanotechnology is involved, the implication of authorities is essential in order to establish a law when using nanotechnology along the food chain for future food applications.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to the manuscript; A.G.-F. was responsible for the bibliographic search and wrote the paper asas principal author; I.O.-S., G.O.-O. and O.M.-B. contributed to the writing and correction of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the project AGL2015-65975-R (FEDER, MINECO, UE) and project RTI2018-094268-B-C21 (MCIU, AEI; FEDER, UE).

Acknowledgments

Ariadna Gasa Falcon thanks the Agencia de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris I de Recerca (AGAUR) from the Catalan government (Spain), for the pre-doctoral grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shashirekha, M.N.; Mallikarjuna, S.E.; Rajarathnam, S. Status of Bioactive Compounds in Foods, with Focus on Fruits and Vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1324–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rodriguez-Casado, A. The Health Potential of Fruits and Vegetables Phytochemicals: Notable Examples. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bonilla, J.; Vargas, F.C.; de Oliveira, T.G.; da Aparecida Makishi, G.L.; do Amaral Sobral, P.J. Recent patents on the application of bioactive compounds in food: A short review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Asioli, D.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Caputo, V.; Vecchio, R.; Annunziata, A.; Næs, T.; Varela, P. Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Peters, R.J.B.; Bouwmeester, H.; Gottardo, S.; Amenta, V.; Arena, M.; Brandhoff, P.; Marvin, H.J.P.; Mech, A.; Moniz, F.B.; Pesudo, L.Q.; et al. Nanomaterials for products and application in agriculture, feed and food. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 54, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ozturk, B.; Argin, S.; Ozilgen, M.; McClements, D.J. Nanoemulsion delivery systems for oil-soluble vitamins: Influence of carrier oil type on lipid digestion and vitamin D3 bioaccessibility. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Teixé-Roig, J.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Velderrain-Rodríguez, G.R.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Martín-Belloso, O. The effect of sodium carboxymethylcellulose on the stability and bioaccessibility of anthocyanin water-in-oil-in-water emulsions. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 2229–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Acevedo-Fani, A.; Silva, H.D.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O.; Vicente, A.A. Formation, stability and antioxidant activity of food-grade multilayer emulsions containing resveratrol. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 71, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Singh, H.; Thompson, A.; Liu, W.; Corredig, M. Liposomes as food ingredients and nutraceutical delivery systems. In Encapsulation Technologies and Delivery Systems for Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals; Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 287–318. [Google Scholar]
  11. Triplett, M.D.; Rathman, J.F. Optimization of β-carotene loaded solid lipid nanoparticles preparation using a high shear homogenization technique. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2009, 11, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oehlke, K.; Adamiuk, M.; Behsnilian, D.; Gräf, V.; Mayer-Miebach, E.; Walz, E.; Greiner, R. Potential bioavailability enhancement of bioactive compounds using food-grade engineered nanomaterials: A review of the existing evidence. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1341–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. A decade of nutraceutical patents: Where are we now in 2018? Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2018, 28, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. To Nutraceuticals and Back: Rethinking a Concept. Foods 2017, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kumar, K.; Yadav, A.N.; Kumar, V.; Vyas, P.; Dhaliwal, H.S. Food waste: A potential bioresource for extraction of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2017, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Clark, R.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.H. Synergistic anticancer activity of capsaicin and 3,3′-diindolylmethane in human colorectal cancer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4297–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hadad, N.; Levy, R. The synergistic anti-inflammatory effects of lycopene, lutein, β-carotene, and carnosic acid combinations via redox-based inhibition of NF-κB signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grainger, E.M.; Schwartz, S.J.; Wang, S.; Unlu, N.Z.; Boileau, T.W.M.; Ferketich, A.K.; Monk, J.P.; Gong, M.C.; Bahnson, R.R.; DeGroff, V.L.; et al. A combination of tomato and soy products for men with recurring prostate cancer and rising prostate specific antigen. Nutr. Cancer 2008, 60, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Horváth, G.; Kemény, Á.; Barthó, L.; Molnár, P.; Deli, J.; Szente, L.; Bozó, T.; Pál, S.; Sándor, K.; Szőke, É.; et al. Effects of some natural carotenoids on TRPA1- and TRPV1-Induced neurogenic inflammatory processes in vivo in the mouse skin. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 56, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yngve, A.; Wolf, A.; Poortvliet, E.; Elmadfa, I.; Brug, J.; Ehrenblad, B.; Franchini, B.; Haraldsdóttir, J.; Krølner, R.; Maes, L.; et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in a sample of 11-year-old children in 9 European countries: The pro children cross-sectional survey. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2005, 49, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Diethelm, K.; Jankovic, N.; Moreno, L.A.; Huybrechts, I.; De Henauw, S.; De Vriendt, T.; González-Gross, M.; Leclercq, C.; Gottrand, F.; Gilbert, C.C.; et al. Food intake of European adolescents in the light of different food-based dietary guidelines: Results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xianquan, S.; Shi, J.; Kakuda, Y.; Yueming, J. Stability of lycopene during food processing and storage. J. Med. Food 2005, 8, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Boon, C.S.; McClements, D.J.; Weiss, J.; Decker, E.A. Factors influencing the chemical stability of carotenoids in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 515–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Solans, C.; Izquierdo, P.; Nolla, J.; Azemar, N.; Garcia-Celma, M. Nano-emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 10, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Artiga-Artigas, M.; Lanjari-Pérez, Y.; Martín-Belloso, O. Curcumin-loaded nanoemulsions stability as affected by the nature and concentration of surfactant. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Artiga-Artigas, M.; Acevedo-Fani, A.; Martín-Belloso, O. Improving the shelf life of low-fat cut cheese using nanoemulsion-based edible coatings containing oregano essential oil and mandarin fiber. Food Control 2017, 76, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. McClements, D.J.; Bai, L.; Chung, C. Recent advances in the utilization of natural emulsifiers to form and stabilize emulsions. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 205–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, H.D.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Vicente, A.A. Influence of surfactant and processing conditions in the stability of oil-in-water nanoemulsions. J. Food Eng. 2015, 167, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yang, Y.; Marshall-Breton, C.; Leser, M.E.; Sher, A.A.; McClements, D.J. Fabrication of ultrafine edible emulsions: Comparison of high-energy and low-energy homogenization methods. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 9, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schultz, S.; Wagner, G.; Urban, K.; Ulrich, J. High-pressure homogenization as a process for emulsion formation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2004, 29, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marzuki, N.H.C.; Wahab, R.A.; Hamid, M.A. An overview of nanoemulsion: Concepts of development and cosmeceutical applications. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 779–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jo, Y.J.; Kwon, Y.J. Characterization of β-carotene nanoemulsions prepared by microfluidization technique. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Komaiko, J.; McClements, D.J. Low-energy formation of edible nanoemulsions by spontaneous emulsification: Factors influencing particle size. J. Food Eng. 2015, 146, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Rojas-Graü, M.A.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Impact of microfluidization or ultrasound processing on the antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli of lemongrass oil-loaded nanoemulsions. Food Control 2014, 37, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, D.; Aihemaiti, Z.; Cao, Y.; Teng, C.; Li, X. Physicochemical stability, microrheological properties and microstructure of lutein emulsions stabilized by multilayer membranes consisting of whey protein isolate, flaxseed gum and chitosan. Food Chem. 2016, 202, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Silva, H.D.; Beldíková, E.; Poejo, J.; Abrunhosa, L.; Serra, A.T.; Duarte, C.M.M.; Brányik, T.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Vicente, A.A. Evaluating the effect of chitosan layer on bioaccessibility and cellular uptake of curcumin nanoemulsions. J. Food Eng. 2019, 243, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gasa-Falcon, A.; Acevedo-Fani, A.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Martín-Belloso, O. Development, physical stability and bioaccessibility of β-carotene-enriched tertiary emulsions. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 64, 103615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guzey, D.; McClements, D.J. Formation, stability and properties of multilayer emulsions for application in the food industry. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 128–130, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Berton-Carabin, C.C.; Sagis, L.; Schroën, K. Formation, structure, and functionality of interfacial layers in food emulsions. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 37, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tokle, T.; Mao, Y.; McClements, D.J. Potential biological fate of emulsion-based delivery systems: Lipid particles nanolaminated with lactoferrin and β-lactoglobulin coatings. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 3200–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mun, S.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Effect of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation of chitosan on the formation of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by surfactant-chitosan membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 296, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsai, W.C.; Rizvi, S.S.H. Simultaneous microencapsulation of hydrophilic and lipophilic bioactives in liposomes produced by an ecofriendly supercritical fluid process. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taylor, T.M.; Davidson, P.M.; Bruce, B.D.; Weiss, J. Liposomal nanocapsules in food science and agriculture. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 587–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Đorđević, V.; Balanč, B.; Belščak-Cvitanović, A.; Lević, S.; Trifković, K.; Kalušević, A.; Kostić, I.; Komes, D.; Bugarski, B.; Nedović, V. Trends in encapsulation technologies for delivery of food bioactive compounds. Food Eng. Rev. 2014, 7, 450–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cheng, C.; Peng, S.; Li, Z.; Zou, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, C. Improved bioavailability of curcumin in liposomes prepared using a pH-driven, organic solvent-free, easily scalable process. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 25978–25986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mozafari, M.R. Liposomes: An overview of manufacturing techniques. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2005, 10, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Mohammadi, M.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Hamishehkar, H. Formulation of nanoliposomal vitamin D3 for potential application in beverage fortification. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 4, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Isailović, B.D.; Kostić, I.T.; Zvonar, A.; Dordević, V.B.; Gašperlin, M.; Nedović, V.A.; Bugarski, B.M. Resveratrol loaded liposomes produced by different techniques. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2013, 19, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chun, J.Y.; Choi, M.J.; Min, S.G.; Weiss, J. Formation and stability of multiple-layered liposomes by layer-by-layer electrostatic deposition of biopolymers. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Palozza, P.; Muzzalupo, R.; Trombino, S.; Valdannini, A.; Picci, N. Solubilization and stabilization of β-carotene in niosomes: Delivery to cultured cells. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2006, 139, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Teo, A.; Lee, S.J.; Goh, K.K.T.; Wolber, F.M. Kinetic stability and cellular uptake of lutein in WPI-stabilised nanoemulsions and emulsions prepared by emulsification and solvent evaporation method. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qian, C.; Decker, E.A.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D.J. Nanoemulsion delivery systems: Influence of carrier oil on β-carotene bioaccessibility. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Young, S.; Basiana, E.; Nitin, N. Effects of interfacial composition on the stability of emulsion and encapsulated bioactives after thermal and high pressure processing. J. Food Eng. 2018, 231, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, X.; Tian, H.; Ho, C.T.; Huang, Q. Stability of citral in emulsions coated with cationic biopolymer layers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lim, A.S.L.; Griffin, C.; Roos, Y.H. Stability and loss kinetics of lutein and β-carotene encapsulated in freeze-dried emulsions with layered interface and trehalose as glass former. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shao, P.; Wang, P.; Niu, B.; Kang, J. Environmental stress stability of pectin-stabilized resveratrol liposomes with different degree of esterification. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Weigel, F.; Weiss, J.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Lutein-enriched emulsion-based delivery systems: Influence of emulsifiers and antioxidants on physical and chemical stability. Food Chem. 2018, 242, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qian, C.; Decker, E.A.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D.J. Inhibition of β-carotene degradation in oil-in-water nanoemulsions: Influence of oil-soluble and water-soluble antioxidants. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Toniazzo, T.; Berbel, I.F.; Cho, S.; Fávaro-Trindade, C.S.; Moraes, I.C.F.; Pinho, S.C. β-carotene-loaded liposome dispersions stabilized with xanthan and guar gums: Physico-chemical stability and feasibility of application in yogurt. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, S.J.; Choi, S.J.; Li, Y.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Protein-stabilized nanoemulsions and emulsions: Comparison of physicochemical stability, lipid oxidation, and lipase digestibility. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aoki, T.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Influence of environmental stresses on stability of O/W emulsions containing droplets stabilized by multilayered membranes produced by a layer-by-layer electrostatic deposition technique. Food Hydrocoll. 2005, 19, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tokle, T.; Lesmes, U.; McClements, D.J. Impact of electrostatic deposition of anionic polysaccharides on the stability of oil droplets coated by lactoferrin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9825–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shu, G.; Khalid, N.; Zhao, Y.; Neves, M.A.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M. Formulation and stability assessment of ergocalciferol loaded oil-in-water nanoemulsions: Insights of emulsifiers effect on stabilization mechanism. Food Res. Int. 2016, 90, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hategekimana, J.; Chamba, M.V.M.; Shoemaker, C.F.; Majeed, H.; Zhong, F. Vitamin E nanoemulsions by emulsion phase inversion: Effect of environmental stress and long-term storage on stability and degradation in different carrier oil types. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 483, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shao, P.; Qiu, Q.; Xiao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, P. Chemical stability and in vitro release properties of β-carotene in emulsions stabilized by Ulva fasciata polysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, C.; Tan, Y.; Xu, Y.; McCleiments, D.J.; Wang, D. Formation, characterization, and application of chitosan/pectin-stabilized multilayer emulsions as astaxanthin delivery systems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, Z.L.; Peng, S.F.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.Q.; Zou, L.Q.; Liu, W.; Liu, C.M. Pluronics modified liposomes for curcumin encapsulation: Sustained release, stability and bioaccessibility. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bauer, E.; Jakob, S.; Mosenthin, R. Principles of physiology of lipid digestion. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Favé, G.; Coste, T.C.; Armand, M. Physicochemical properties of lipids: New strategies to manage fatty acid bioavailability. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2004, 50, 815–831. [Google Scholar]
  70. Maldonado-Valderrama, J.; Wilde, P.; MacIerzanka, A.; MacKie, A. The role of bile salts in digestion. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 165, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sarkar, A.; Ye, A.; Singh, H. On the role of bile salts in the digestion of emulsified lipids. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 60, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Qian, C.; Martín-Belloso, O.; McClements, D.J. Influence of particle size on lipid digestion and β-carotene bioaccessibility in emulsions and nanoemulsions. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1472–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ahmed, K.; Li, Y.; McClements, D.J.; Xiao, H. Nanoemulsion- and emulsion-based delivery systems for curcumin: Encapsulation and release properties. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Singh, H.; Ye, A.; Horne, D. Structuring food emulsions in the gastrointestinal tract to modify lipid digestion. Prog. Lipid Res. 2009, 48, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Golding, M.; Wooster, T.J. The influence of emulsion structure and stability on lipid digestion. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 15, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gasa-Falcon, A.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Martín-Belloso, O. Impact of emulsifier nature and concentration on the stability of β-carotene enriched nanoemulsions during in vitro digestion. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Yang, Y.; Decker, E.A.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D.J. Enhancing vitamin E bioaccessibility: Factors impacting solubilization and hydrolysis of α-tocopherol acetate encapsulated in emulsion-based delivery systems. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mun, S.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Influence of emulsifier type on in vitro digestibility of lipid droplets by pancreatic lipase. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 770–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wackerbarth, H.; Stoll, T.; Gebken, S.; Pelters, C.; Bindrich, U. Carotenoid-protein interaction as an approach for the formulation of functional food emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1254–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. McClements, D.J.; Decker, E.A.; Park, Y.; Weiss, J. Designing food structure to control stability, digestion, release and absorption of lipophilic food components. Food Biophys. 2008, 3, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Feng, H.; Li, C.; Tan, C.P.; Fu, X.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Q. Physicochemical properties and in vitro bioaccessibility of lutein loaded emulsions stabilized by corn fiber gums. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 38243–38250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Liang, R.; Shoemaker, C.F.; Yang, X.; Zhong, F.; Huang, Q. Stability and bioaccessibility of β-carotene in nanoemulsions stabilized by modified starches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gasa-Falcon, A.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Martín-Belloso, O. Influence of mandarin fiber addition on physico-chemical properties of nanoemulsions containing β-carotene under simulated gastrointestinal digestion conditions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 84, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qiu, C.; Zhao, M.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Influence of anionic dietary fibers (xanthan gum and pectin) on oxidative stability and lipid digestibility of wheat protein-stabilized fish oil-in-water emulsion. Food Res. Int. 2015, 74, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Chang, Y.; McClements, D.J. Influence of emulsifier type on the in vitro digestion of fish oil-in-water emulsions in the presence of an anionic marine polysaccharide (fucoidan): Caseinate, whey protein, lecithin, or Tween 80. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 61, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Influence of emulsifier type on gastrointestinal fate of oil-in-water emulsions containing anionic dietary fiber (pectin). Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Scholten, E.; Moschakis, T.; Biliaderis, C.G. Biopolymer composites for engineering food structures to control product functionality. Food Struct. 2014, 1, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zeeb, B.; Lopez-Pena, C.L.; Weiss, J.; McClements, D.J. Controlling lipid digestion using enzyme-induced crosslinking ofbiopolymer interfacial layers in multilayer emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 46, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Y.; Hu, M.; Xiao, H.; Du, Y.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Controlling the functional performance of emulsion-based delivery systems using multi-component biopolymer coatings. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2010, 76, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, T.; Xia, N.; Xia, Q. Multilayer emulsions as a strategy for linseed oil and alpha-lipoic acid micro-encapsulation: Study on preparation and in vitro characterization. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 3513–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gudipati, V.; Sandra, S.; Mcclements, D.J.; Decker, E.A. Oxidative stability and in vitro digestibility of fish oil-in-water emulsions containing multilayered membranes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8093–8099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mun, S.; Decker, E.A.; Park, Y.; Weiss, J.; McClements, D.J. Influence of interfacial composition on in vitro digestibility of emulsified lipids: Potential mechanism for chitosan’s ability to inhibit fat digestion. Food Biophys. 2006, 1, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, C.; Xu, W.; Jin, W.; Shah, B.R.; Li, Y.; Li, B. Influence of anionic alginate and cationic chitosan on physicochemical stability and carotenoids bioaccessibility of soy protein isolate-stabilized emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tan, C.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, W.; Xia, S. Biopolymer-coated liposomes by electrostatic adsorption of chitosan (chitosomes) as novel delivery systems for carotenoids. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pinheiro, A.C.; Lad, M.; Silva, H.D.; Coimbra, M.A.; Boland, M.; Vicente, A.A. Unravelling the behaviour of curcumin nanoemulsions during in vitro digestion: Effect of the surface charge. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 3147–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Karthik, P.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Enhancing omega-3 fatty acids nanoemulsion stability and in-vitro digestibility through emulsifiers. J. Food Eng. 2016, 187, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cuomo, F.; Cofelice, M.; Venditti, F.; Ceglie, A.; Miguel, M.; Lindman, B.; Lopez, F. In-vitro digestion of curcumin loaded chitosan-coated liposomes. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 168, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Sun, Q.; Um, B.H.; Park, Y.; McClements, D.J. In vitro and in vivo study of fucoxanthin bioavailability from nanoemulsion-based delivery systems: Impact of lipid carrier type. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Yang, Y.; McClements, D.J. Vitamin E bioaccessibility: Influence of carrier oil type on digestion and release of emulsified α-tocopherol acetate. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Schoener, A.L.; Zhang, R.; Lv, S.; Weiss, J.; McClements, D.J. Fabrication of plant-based vitamin D3 -fortified nanoemulsions: Influence of carrier oil type on vitamin bioaccessibility. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 7239–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, W.; Ye, A.; Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Singh, H. Structure and integrity of liposomes prepared from milk- or soybean-derived phospholipids during in vitro digestion. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Abbas, S.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, S. Modulation of the carotenoid bioaccessibility through liposomal encapsulation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 123, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Holst, B.; Williamson, G. Nutrients and phytochemicals: From bioavailability to bioefficacy beyond antioxidants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Sadhukha, T.; Layek, B.; Prabha, S. Incorporation of lipolysis in monolayer permeability studies of lipid-based oral drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2018, 8, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ujhelyi, Z.; Fenyvesi, F.; Váradi, J.; Fehér, P.; Kiss, T.; Veszelka, S.; Deli, M.; Vecsernyés, M.; Bácskay, I. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of surfactants used in self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems and their effects on paracellular transport in Caco-2 cell monolayer. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 47, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Dimitrijevic, D.; Shaw, A.J.; Florence, A.T. Effects of some non-ionic surfactants on transepithelial permeability in Caco-2 cells. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2000, 52, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Guri, A.; Gülseren, I.; Corredig, M. Utilization of solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced delivery of curcumin in cocultures of HT29-MTX and Caco-2 cells. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 1410–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Andar, A.U.; Hood, R.R.; Vreeland, W.N.; Devoe, D.L.; Swaan, P.W. Microfluidic preparation of liposomes to determine particle size influence on cellular uptake mechanisms. Pharm. Res. 2014, 31, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sangsuriyawong, A.; Limpawattana, M.; Siriwan, D.; Klaypradit, W. Properties and bioavailability assessment of shrimp astaxanthin loaded liposomes. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lu, W.; Kelly, A.; Miao, S. Bioaccessibility and cellular uptake of β-carotene encapsulated in model O/W emulsions: Influence of initial droplet size and emulsifiers. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Ribeiro, H.S.; Guerrero, J.M.M.; Briviba, K.; Rechkemmer, G.; Schuchmann, H.P.; Schubert, H. Cellular uptake of carotenoid-loaded oil-in-water emulsions in colon carcinoma cells in vitro. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9366–9369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Frede, K.; Henze, A.; Khalil, M.; Baldermann, S.; Schweigert, F.J.; Rawel, H. Stability and cellular uptake of lutein-loaded emulsions. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 8, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yang, Y.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D.J. Impact of lipid phase on the bioavailability of vitamin E in emulsion-based delivery systems: Relative importance of bioaccessibility, absorption, and transformation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3946–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, Q.; Chen, J.; Qin, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T. Encapsulation of pterostilbene in nanoemulsions: Influence of lipid composition on physical stability, in vitro digestion, bioaccessibility, and Caco-2 cell monolayer permeability. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6604–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Arranz, E.; Corredig, M.; Guri, A. Designing food delivery systems: Challenges related to the: In vitro methods employed to determine the fate of bioactives in the gut. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3319–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Li, Y.; Arranz, E.; Guri, A.; Corredig, M. Mucus interactions with liposomes encapsulating bioactives: Interfacial tensiometry and cellular uptake on Caco-2 and cocultures of Caco-2/HT29-MTX. Food Res. Int. 2017, 92, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sigurdsson, H.H.; Kirch, J.; Lehr, C.M. Mucus as a barrier to lipophilic drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 453, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sabouri, S.; Arranz, E.; Guri, A.; Corredig, M. Sodium caseinate stabilized emulsions as a delivery system for epigallocatechin-gallate: Bioaccessibility, anti-proliferative activity and intestinal absorption. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 44, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Fernandez-Avila, C.; Trujillo, A.J. Enhanced stability of emulsions treated by ultra-high pressure homogenization for delivering conjugated linoleic acid in Caco-2 cells. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 71, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gülseren, I.; Guri, A.; Corredig, M. Effect of interfacial composition on uptake of curcumin-piperine mixtures in oil in water emulsions by Caco-2 cells. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Walia, N.; Chen, L. Pea protein-based vitamin D nanoemulsions: Fabrication, stability and in vitro study using Caco-2 cells. Food Chem. 2020, 305, 125475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chen, X.; Zou, L.Q.; Niu, J.; Liu, W.; Peng, S.F.; Liu, C.M. The stability, sustained release and cellular antioxidant activity of curcumin nanoliposomes. Molecules 2015, 20, 14293–14311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Anwar, S.H.; Kunz, B. The influence of drying methods on the stabilization of fish oil microcapsules: Comparison of spray granulation, spray drying, and freeze drying. J. Food Eng. 2011, 105, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rocha, G.A.; Fávaro-Trindade, C.S.; Grosso, C.R.F. Microencapsulation of lycopene by spray drying: Characterization, stability and application of microcapsules. Food Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Šeregelj, V.; Tumbas Šaponjac, V.; Lević, S.; Kalušević, A.; Ćetković, G.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.; Nedović, V.; Stajčić, S.; Vulić, J.; Vidaković, A. Application of encapsulated natural bioactive compounds from red pepper waste in yogurt. J. Microencapsul. 2019, 36, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Marsanasco, M.; Márquez, A.L.; Wagner, J.R.; del V. Alonso, S.; Chiaramoni, N.S. Liposomes as vehicles for vitamins E and C: An alternative to fortify orange juice and offer vitamin C protection after heat treatment. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 3039–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hassan, B.; Chatha, S.A.S.; Hussain, A.I.; Zia, K.M.; Akhtar, N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Velickova, E.; Winkelhausen, E.; Kuzmanova, S.; Alves, V.D.; Moldão-Martins, M. Impact of chitosan-beeswax edible coatings on the quality of fresh strawberries (Fragaria ananassa cv Camarosa) under commercial storage conditions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 52, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sharifimehr, S.; Soltanizadeh, N.; Hossein Goli, S.A. Effects of edible coating containing nano-emulsion of Aloe vera and eugenol on the physicochemical properties of shrimp during cold storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 3604–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 09 00325 g001 550
Figure 1. Nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems for encapsulating lipophilic bioactive compounds.
Figure 1. Nanostructured lipid-based delivery systems for encapsulating lipophilic bioactive compounds.
Foods 09 00325 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gasa-Falcon, A.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Martín-Belloso, O. Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems as a Strategy to Increase Functionality of Bioactive Compounds. Foods 2020, 9, 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030325

AMA Style

Gasa-Falcon A, Odriozola-Serrano I, Oms-Oliu G, Martín-Belloso O. Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems as a Strategy to Increase Functionality of Bioactive Compounds. Foods. 2020; 9(3):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gasa-Falcon, Ariadna, Isabel Odriozola-Serrano, Gemma Oms-Oliu, and Olga Martín-Belloso. 2020. "Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems as a Strategy to Increase Functionality of Bioactive Compounds" Foods 9, no. 3: 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030325

APA Style

Gasa-Falcon, A., Odriozola-Serrano, I., Oms-Oliu, G., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2020). Nanostructured Lipid-Based Delivery Systems as a Strategy to Increase Functionality of Bioactive Compounds. Foods, 9(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop