Next Article in Journal
Effect of Substituent Groups on the Adsorption Efficiency of Phenols by Activated Carbon Developed by Hydrothermally Treated Phyllanthus Emblica Fruit Stone
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of the Application and Potential of Straw Biochar in the Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Soil Amendments for Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils: Mechanisms, Impact, and Future Prospects
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Metal Tolerance Proteins (MTPs) Associated with the Homeostasis of Divalent Mineral Elements in Ga-Treated Rice Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing Environmental Risks of Local Contamination of Garden Urban Soils with Heavy Metals Using Ecotoxicological Tests

1
Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Plant Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(12), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120873
Submission received: 31 October 2024 / Revised: 26 November 2024 / Accepted: 27 November 2024 / Published: 30 November 2024

Abstract

Heavy metal soil contamination in urban areas poses a significant environmental hazard, particularly in regions with historical or ongoing industrial activities. These areas are often polluted with metals such as Pb, Cu, Cd, and Zn, which can be absorbed by plants and pose risks to both ecosystems and human health. This study investigates soil contamination in urban gardens in Wroclaw, Poland, where elevated levels of trace elements were detected. Standard soil analyses, including macroelement content, granulometry, and trace element concentrations, were performed alongside an ecotoxicological evaluation using an Ostracodtoxkit test. The test evaluates the impact of contaminants on organism growth. An uncontaminated urban garden soil served as a reference. This study revealed that Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd concentrations in soils exceeded limits permitted by Polish regulations in several soil samples. Despite the high concentrations of total metals, the bioavailable forms of these metals (measured by extraction of 1 M NH4NO3 extraction) were significantly lower, highlighting that the total metal content may not fully reflect the environmental risk. Pb was identified as the primary contributor to growth inhibition of test organisms, showing a particularly strong correlation with ecotoxicity. These findings underscore the importance of using ecotoxicological tests to evaluate soil contamination risks.

1. Introduction

The contamination of soils with heavy metals in urban areas is a serious hazard [1,2,3]. In particular, areas with the current or historical development of heavy industry are the most polluted [4,5,6]. The rapid development of urban areas as housing, transport, and commercial and service facilities contributes to the contamination of the environment with heavy metals [7]. There are many examples in the world of environmental hazards related to exposure to heavy metals in urban areas. For example, in Toronto (Canada), Mexican cities, and India, it was found that children are exposed to Pb in soil and water, originating from past industrial activities [3,8,9,10,11,12], respectively. In northwest China, exceeded concentrations of Cu and Zn have been found in traffic-source soils, while exceeded concentrations of Pb, Hg, and As have been sourced from industrial activities [6].
The main concern is urban gardening, which gained significant relevance due to its economic, social, and cultural benefits [13]. The contamination of these soils with heavy metals and their use for growing fruits and vegetables could be a threat to people’s health [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Chronic symptoms of lead Pb to human disease include damage to the kidney, brain, reproductive organs, and CNS/PNS [22,23]. Long-term exposure to cadmium leads to cancer and toxicity symptoms in organ systems [24]. The human body requires certain metal cations for proper functioning. These can be categorised into essential metals, which play a well-defined role in metabolic processes, and nonessential metals, which have no beneficial function. Essential metals, such as copper (Cu), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), potassium (K), and calcium (Ca), are needed in the diet, and their deficiency can cause imbalances in metabolism and deficiency diseases. Nonessential metals, such as mercury (Hg), gold (Au), nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb), are toxic and pose health risks. These harmful metals can accumulate in vegetables grown in contaminated soil, and when consumed, they accumulate in the human body [25,26].
Heavy metal contamination also causes environmental threats. Exceeded concentrations of Pb, Cu, Zn, and Cd negatively affect plant growth [14]. Lead compounds have a negative impact on microbiological activity and plant growth. It disrupts photosynthesis and water absorption by root systems and limits the availability of some biogenic elements for plants [23,27]. Cadmium contributes to the disruption of homeostasis, the intensification of oxidative stress in plant cells, and the disruption of their membrane integrity [28,29]. However, plants have developed complex mechanisms to overcome these biotic and abiotic stresses during evolution, including, for example, hyperaccumulation or tolerance [30]. Plants must evolve rapidly to adapt to environmental challenges, such as heavy-metal-rich soils, which may be naturally enriched or anthropogenically contaminated. Some species thrive under these conditions through hyper-tolerance mechanisms. One strategy involves excluding toxic metals, minimising absorption and root-to-shoot translocation [31]. Alternatively, hyperaccumulators can store two to four times more metals in their shoots than non-accumulating plants in the same environment [32,33]. These plants tolerate high levels of metals without toxicity symptoms, accumulating >10 mg/g Mn, >3 mg/g Zn, >1 mg/g As, Cr, Ni, or Pb; >0.3 mg/g Co or Cu; and >0.1 mg/g Cd, Se, or Tl in their shoots. Hyperaccumulators remove metals from roots by storing them in aerial tissues [34].
Certain plant species tend to accumulate heavy metals in their tissues, causing a serious threat to humans from their consumption [10]. Vegetables growing near the current or historical industry [34,35] or highways [9] were more contaminated compared to those originating from low-contaminated sites.
Ecotoxicological tests are valuable tools for assessing the impact of soil pollution on organisms that inhabit or interact with contaminated soils. They provide a comprehensive evaluation of soil toxicity and its broader ecological implications [23,36]. An effective assessment of soil contamination should include a combination of chemical and ecotoxicological indices [37,38]. Toxicological bioassays provide much more reliable information on the effects exerted by environmental pollution on the biota than soil chemistry alone, as they are based on reactions of living organisms to complex sets of factors that can act synergistically or antagonistically [39]. The ecotoxicological examination of environmental samples should therefore be an important complement to chemical analysis in a comprehensive assessment of environmental risk [40]. Numerous assays, which use various groups of biota, representative of different levels of the food chain, have been adopted as ISO or OECD norms [41,42,43].
The useful tool for assessing the toxicity of bioavailable forms of the trace elements is the Ostracodtoxkit (Heterocypris incongruens). H. incongruens was a more sensitive indicator of soil contamination with trace elements than test plants [40]. In another study, crustacean bioassays (including H. incongruens) were more sensitive than the bacterial test [41]. The toxicity of trace elements on organisms depends on the forms of their occurrence in soils and soil properties, as well as factors affecting the solubility of trace elements and their concentration in soil solutions [44,45]. Trace element concentrations in soils are determined primarily by their levels in the parent material from which the soils formed. However, anthropogenic activities (responsible for the release of trace elements in ecosystems) often modify the natural level, biochemical balance, and geochemical cycling of these metals in the environment [46]. Heavy metals can be involved in a series of complex chemical and biological interactions. The most important factors that affect the mobility of trace elements are pH, sorbent nature, presence and concentration of organic and inorganic ligands, root exudates, and nutrients. Furthermore, redox reactions, both biotic and abiotic, are of great importance in controlling the oxidation state and, thus, the mobility and the toxicity of many elements, such as Cr, Se, Co, Pb, As, Ni, and Cu [38]. The bioavailability of elements in the soil reflects the extent to which an element present in a potential source of contamination (in this case, in the soil) can enter into a plant or other living organisms or be absorbed by them [47]. Bioavailability is the proportion of total metals available for incorporation into the biota (bioaccumulation). Total metal concentrations do not necessarily correspond to metal bioavailability. For this reason, it is important to assess the bioavailability of elements by soil organisms, for which we use ecotoxicological tests [47,48].
The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the environmental risk of trace element contamination in garden soils using inhibition of ostracod growth as the toxicity response. The following hypotheses were tested:
  • Ecotoxicological tests using Heterocypris incongruens offer a more sensitive evaluation of soil contamination compared to traditional chemical analyses.
  • The toxicity of trace elements to organisms depends on their chemical forms in the soil and environmental factors that affect their solubility and concentration in soil solutions. These factors include soil processes such as sorption, mobility, and bioavailability, influenced by geochemical, climatic, and biological conditions.
  • Local contamination significantly increases environmental risk, as demonstrated by the results of ecotoxicological assessments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soils

The soil material was collected from three urban gardens located in Wroclaw (Poland), in total from 8 sampling points (1–8) (Figure 1). Detailed data on the location and soil conditions are given in Figure 1 and Table 1. The gardens were selected based on the high risk of local heavy metal contamination related to historical or current industry, high road traffic, and the flood that occurred in 1997. In flood-affected areas, sediment sorting and mixing of pollutants with grains from diverse sources within a catchment pose significant challenges. This process can cause metal concentrations to vary by one to two orders of magnitude in just a few centimetres. During floods, pollutants formerly temporarily stored in the channel are quickly entrained and transferred to the floodplain [49]. Floods can also trigger primary pollution when extreme precipitation causes settling ponds or washes of stockpiles [48]. No contamination was found in the soil at point 1; this soil is close to the arterial road, and points 1–4 are close to industrial sites, such as Hutmen, which is used to process copper materials. Plots 6–7 are close to an establishment that in the past dealt with car repairs and paint services. Allotment holders reported that during the 1997 flood, a large amount of car paint was spread over the southern part of the allotments, hence possible contamination. Point 8 is located close to a residential area.
The soil samples were taken from levels 0–25 cm, and the average weight of one sample was 2 kg. Samples were taken from areas intended for vegetable cultivation, three from each plot (garden) in July 2022. The samples were dried and sieved through a 2 mm sieve to separate the skeletal fraction from the earth fraction. The earth fraction is the sum of fractions with a diameter equal to or less than <2 mm, while the skeletal fraction is the fraction above >2 mm. The soil texture was determined using a combined sieve and hydrometer method and chemical analyses were performed with commonly used methods [50]. The soil pH was measured in a suspension in 1 M KCl (1:2.5; v/v). Organic carbon (Corg) and carbonates were determined using a CS-MAT 5500 analyser (Strohlein Instruments, which is based in Kaarst, Germany).
Total trace metal concentrations were determined after soil digestion with aqua regia in a microwave system. The concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in the digests were determined by ICP-AES (iCAP 7400, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All analyses were performed in triplicates. The quality of the determinations has been monitored using soil reference materials (sample ID: SRM 2709, SRM 2711, RTH 912, RTH 953), with the certified total concentration (‘aqua regia extractable’) of trace elements being analysed. Potentially soluble forms were extracted in dilute nitric acid according to the ISO standard [51] and in 1 M ammonium nitrate according to the ISO standard [52]. The concentrations of other possible pollutants were not measured.
Table 1. The basic parameters of studies soils (1–8).
Table 1. The basic parameters of studies soils (1–8).
NOGR.
GROUP
FLA.
FRA
FRApH
H2O
pH
KCl
C
[g/kg]
N
[g/kg]
C/NHYD
1SCL244.46.916.713.640.2514.660.1
2SCL26-7.256.874.430.2517.570.54
3SL15-7.486.803.880.3112.530.35
4SCL218.47.947.164.100.2218.370
5SCL236.78.007.147.450.4018.490
6LS164.47.046.926.430.3418.860.39
7LS175.66.96.877.640.3720.680.2
8SCL208.27.787.583.640.2514.660
Note: Explanation of the abbreviations used in Table 2: NO—No. of sampling point, GR. GROUP—Granulometric Group (USDA clasyfication [53]), FLA. FRA—Flatable fraction (<0.02 [mm] [%]), FRA—Fraction (>2 [mm] [%]), pH H2O—pH H2O Destilated—mean, pH KCl—pH KCl—mean, C [g/kg]—C [g/kg]—mean, N [g/kg]—N [g/kg]—mean, HYD—Hydrolitic acidity.
The physical and chemical characteristics of the soils from sampling points 1–8 were similar (Table 1). Soils were classified as SCL (sandy clay loam—sampling points 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), SL (sandy loam—sampling point 3), and LS (loamy sand—sampling points 6, 7) (according to USDA classification) [54]. The pH in KCl ranged from 6.71 to 7.58, which corresponds to the appropriate level for plant development and does not significantly contribute to the mobility of heavy metals. The N content [g/kg] ranged from 0.22 to 0.40. The C content [g/kg] ranged from 3.64 to 7.64, which is at the appropriate level considering urban gardening, and the difference is the result of the soil additives that improve plant growth (for example, manure or compost).

2.2. The Toxicity Tests

To increase the bioavailability of heavy metals in the tested soils, the soils were previously irrigated for 1 week to 70% of the water capacity. The toxicity of eight test soils (1–8, Table 1) was tested, and a reference sediment marked K was used as an additional control. The reference sediment is the standard control recommended in the Ostracod test.
A standardised Ostracod test kit was used for ecotoxicological tests (ISO Standard 14371) [54]. The test organisms were Heterocypris incongruens, a crustacean of the phylum Ostracoda. One repetition was a test well filled with test soil (1000 µL) flooded with 4 mL of standard medium with food (algae). There were ten test organisms per replicate. Each variant of the experiment (1–8, K) was repeated six times.
The test organisms are juvenile ostracods obtained by activation of cysts for an incubation time of 48 h at T [25 °C], 3000 LUX illumination. The average size of the juveniles on the day the test began was 160 micrometres. The duration of the test is 6 days from the moment the ostracods are placed in the test wells.
After 6 days, the ostracods of each test well were immobilised in Lugol solution and measured under a microscope (Zeiss Stemi 508 is manufactured by Carl Zeiss AG, headquartered in Oberkochen, Germany) with a microscope camera (Axiocam ERc 5s is manufactured by Carl Zeiss AG, headquartered in Oberkochen, Germany) using object measurement software (Zen Core 3.5).

2.3. Data Analysis

The normality of the data was confirmed using a Shapiro–Wilk test. The body size of the ostracods was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences between individual combinations were checked using a Tukey’s post hoc test. The analyses were performed in SAS University Edition. The inhibition of growth rate of the test organisms was calculated using the following formula:
I n h i b i t i o n   o f   g r o w t h = 100 ( ( A v e r a g e   g r o w t h   r a t e G r o w t h   r a t e   i n   r e f e r e n c e   s e d i m e n t ) · 100 )
where
Average growth rate—the average of the growth rates of all organisms in the sample (μm);
Growth rate in the reference sediment—constant = 203.44.
Pearson’s correlation was evaluated to investigate the relationship between growth inhibition effects and individual heavy metals in soils, considering both total and bioavailable forms. A species-sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach was employed to assess the sensitivity of test species to contaminated soils. This involved calculating the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of individuals—representing the proportion of individuals experiencing growth inhibition—based on contaminant concentrations in soil, following the methodology of [55]. Various fitting models were tested to determine the best relationship between contaminant concentration and PAF, with polynomial modelling providing the highest R2 value. All analyses were performed with the Origin Pro software 10.2.

3. Results

3.1. The Concentrations of Trace Metals and Their Available Forms Content in the Studied Examined Soils

Soil contamination with Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd was compared with the permissible limits set by Polish legislation [54] (Table 2), with additional limits for Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in agricultural soils in various countries presented in Table S1 [56,57,58,59]. While most European countries have legislation specifying permissible element concentrations in soils, the methods to determine these limits vary greatly (Table S1).
According to the Polish permissible limits, Zn concentrations exceeded the permissible levels at sampling points 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, with values ranging from 1059 to 3465 mg/kg (dry mass). The permissible Cu content was exceeded at sampling point 2 with a concentration of 322 mg/kg (dry mass). An elevated Pb content was observed in sample 6, 7, 8, with levels ranging from 329 to 402 mg/kg (dry mass). The permissible Cd content was exceeded at sampling points 4, and 5, with a concentration of 6 mg/kg (dry mass) (Table 2). Compared to the permissible limits for other countries (Table S1), the measured zinc concentrations in the samples exceed the limits set for Italy, Ontario, and Canada, particularly in Sample 2 (3465 mg/kg), which surpasses all the listed limits. Copper levels are generally within the acceptable range for most countries, although some samples exceed the Canadian limit. Lead concentrations tend to exceed the limits for Italy and Ontario, especially in Samples 2, 6, and 8, but remain within the limits for countries like Flanders. While cadmium limits are not provided in the first table, the measured cadmium levels are relatively low compared to the table.
The amounts of bioavailable metal forms extracted using 1 M ammonium nitrate in the examined soils were as follows: between <0.0050 and 0.03 mg/kg for Cd, <0.0050 mg/kg for Pb; 0.25 to 0.95 mg/kg for Cu, and 0.05 to 2.55 mg/kg for Zn (Table 2). Despite the high total concentrations of Zn in soils of several thousand mg/kg, the amounts of easily soluble Zn forms (released from soils in extractions with 1 M NH4NO3) remained low. In neutral soil (pH 6–7), which occurs in the study area, NH4NO3 was extracted only from 0.01% to 0.14% of the total zinc content (Table 2).
The use of this 0.43 M HNO3 extraction results in the release of 11 to 82% of total Zn, 30 to 83% of total Cu, 32 to 86% of total Pb, and from 35% to more than 90% of total Cd (Table 2). The highest concentrations of all trace elements extracted with 0.43 M HNO3 were found in soils 4, 5. The soil from sampling point 4 has the lowest organic C content of all garden soils. Both Cu and Pb are known for their high affinity binding to SOM.

3.2. The Ecotoxicity Indices

The mortality of test organisms after 6 days of incubation was low, not exceeding 30% in all samples (Table S2).
The growth of the test organisms was significantly inhibited at all sampling points in comparison to the reference soil (K) (F = 28.13, p = 0 < 0.001). The highest growth inhibition was observed for sampling points 7 and 8 and after that, 6 (Figure 2). More specifically, a significant reduction in organism growth was found in these sampling points compared to reference sediment (K) and control soil (1). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the uncontaminated soil (1) and the soils from sampling points 3, 4, and 5.
Additionally, it should be noted that the highest levels of Pb contamination were identified in the soils from sampling points 7 and 8 (Table 1). The combined content of Pb, Cu, and Zn probably influenced the reduced development of ostracods in these areas. Furthermore, at sampling points 6 and 7, Zn concentrations exceeded the permissible standards, which may have contributed to the observed adverse effects on ostracods (Table 2).
The Pearson’s correlation analysis (Table 3) revealed that Pb is the most influential factor in growth inhibition, with strong correlations observed for both total forms and those available in NH4NO3 (r = 0.67 and 0.28, respectively). On the contrary, Cd and Zn exhibited significant negative correlations with growth inhibition, although they did not influence the negative effects on Ostracods. No significant correlation was found for Cu.
To assess the sensitivity of Heterocypris incongruens to heavy metal contamination, specifically to total lead (Pb) concentrations, in the soil, a species sensitivity distribution graph (SSD) was constructed (Figure 3). SSD highlights the non-linear relationship between Pb concentrations and the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of individuals, based on growth inhibition responses. As the Pb concentration increases, the response varies significantly, with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.46, indicating a moderate fit of the model. The graph also identifies the concentration of Pb corresponding to a 50% affected fraction of the species, which was determined to be 280 mg of Pb per kg of soil. This concentration marks a critical threshold where half of the test population is expected to experience growth inhibition due to Pb contamination.

4. Discussion

This investigation aimed to assess the environmental risks associated with trace element contamination in garden soils, using Heterocypris incongruens as a bioindicator. The findings provide valuable information on the complex interactions between soil contamination and ecological health, underscoring the importance of integrating ecotoxicological assessments into environmental monitoring.

4.1. Heavy Metal Contamination and Bioavailability

The presence of heavy metals, particularly zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and copper (Cu), was found to exceed the allowed limits in urban garden soils and the high lead (Pb) content. Previous studies suggest that Pb contamination in these areas may arise from various anthropogenic sources, such as lead-containing paints, historical use of leaded fuels, and coal heating [60]. Waste incineration and metal-smelting activities are known contributors to Pb pollution [61].
Other investigations revealed that 16 of the 19 soil samples collected from gardens near the Zletovska River and a Pb-Zn mine exceeded Dutch environmental standards for heavy metals, emphasising the need for regulatory frameworks in regions lacking soil contamination guidelines. For example, the maximum concentration of Cd recorded was 4.03 mg/kg, while the levels of Pb were consistently high, indicating ongoing anthropogenic contamination in river sediments. Similarly, allotment gardens in Wroclaw, Poland, experienced contamination due to the proximity to metallurgical and automotive industries, illustrating a common industrial impact trend on soil quality [62].
The bioavailability of these trace elements is crucial to understanding their environmental risk. Bioavailability assessments typically rely on measuring labile trace element concentrations in the soil, which provides a more accurate reflection of potential toxicity than total concentration measurements alone [39]. This study aligns with the findings of [63], highlighting the significance of soluble forms of toxic elements in determining the environmental risk posed by soil pollution.
Chemical extractants, such as 0.01 M CaCl2 and 1 M NH4NO3, are effective in estimating the bioavailability of trace elements [63]. Despite the high total concentrations of Zn in the studied soils, only a small fraction was bioavailable, further confirming that the chemical forms, rather than the total amounts of metals, dictate environmental risk. Previous studies have shown that even elevated concentrations of metals do not necessarily correlate with increased leaching, plant uptake, or adverse effects on soil organisms [64].
The 0.43 M HNO3 extraction method has been shown to effectively assess the reactive fractions of trace metals [65]. This method proved useful in correlating the availability of Cd, Ni, and Zn with other soil attributes, providing a comprehensive view of trace metal behaviour in various soil types [66]. Other studies have also highlighted differences in the content of metals extracted from soils with 0.43 M HNO3, particularly with respect to organic carbon content [67].

4.2. Ecotoxicity Tests

The significant growth inhibition observed in Heterocypris incongruens at multiple sampling points highlights the effectiveness of using bioindicators to detect sublethal effects from trace metal contamination, often overlooked by standard chemical assessments. Lead was identified as the primary contaminant associated with growth inhibition, corroborated by correlation analyses. This finding underscores the ability of Pb to disrupt biological processes, even at low bioavailable concentrations, consistent with previous research that demonstrates its toxic effects on soil organisms [37,65]. The species-sensitivity distribution (SSD) analysis further supports this, showing a moderate correlation, which suggests that, while Pb concentration is a significant factor affecting the growth of Heterocypris incongruens, other environmental or biological factors, as well as the presence of other heavy metals, may also influence the species’ sensitivity. The observed non-linear trend is consistent with the behaviour of many ecotoxicological stressors, where lower concentrations may have minimal impact, but higher concentrations lead to more pronounced effects [68]. Identification of the 50% affected fraction (280 mg/kg of Pb) serves as a pivotal threshold for evaluating ecological risks, but this value should be viewed as a guide rather than a definitive risk cutoff.
Zinc and copper also contributed to growth inhibition; however, this relationship was not confirmed by the correlation analysis. Previous studies have demonstrated a link between high levels of bioavailable zinc and significant ecotoxicity, further supporting the potential role of these metals in affecting the health and growth [64,67]. Although mortality rates among ostracods were low across samples, observed growth inhibition emphasises the importance of considering both acute and sublethal effects in environmental risk assessments, as highlighted in previous studies [66,69].
The complexity of trace metal contamination in soils is further compounded by interactions between multiple metals, which can result in synergistic, antagonistic, or additive effects on organisms. In this investigation, the mechanisms of these interactions were not studied, but the presence of metal mixtures can alter the bioavailability of individual metals, affecting their toxicity and the overall ecological impact [70]. Understanding how metal speciation, soil properties, and biological effects interact is crucial for accurately assessing the risks posed by contaminated environments. Metal mixtures often lead to more unpredictable and potent toxic responses compared to individual metal exposures, highlighting the need for more comprehensive studies on combined metal toxicity [71]. Research into these interactions will improve environmental risk assessments, allowing for more reliable predictions of ecological consequences and more effective management strategies for contaminated sites [32].

5. Conclusions

Ostracods (Heterocypris incongruens) have proven to be reliable bioindicators for assessing heavy metal contamination in soils. When the total concentrations and bioavailable forms of metals are examined, it becomes possible to identify their specific effects on soil organisms. Lead (Pb) emerged as the most toxic metal in this study, significantly inhibiting the growth of the test organisms and highlighting its major role in soil ecotoxicity.
Localised contamination by heavy metals such as Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd was identified in certain allotment gardens, posing potential risks to both soil ecosystems and human health. In addition to total metal concentrations, it is crucial to consider the bioavailability of metals and other factors that influence their mobility, including soil pH, organic matter content, and the origin of fertilisers used by gardeners, when assessing environmental risks.
The ongoing monitoring of these gardens is essential to assess the long-term ecological risks posed by heavy metal contamination and its broader impacts on both the environment and human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics12120873/s1, Table S1: Limits for Cu, Zn (mg/kg, dry soil) for Agricultural Land Uses in Various Countries [56,57,58,59]; Table S2: The mortality of the test organisms after 6 days of incubation (%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; methodology: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; software: D.G.; validation: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; formal analysis: D.G.; investigation: D.G.; resources: D.G.; data curation: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; writing—review and editing: D.G., I.G. and K.S.; visualisation: D.G.; supervision: K.S. and I.G.; project administration: D.G.; funding acquisition: D.G. and K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences (Poland) as the Ph.D. research programme “Bon doktoranta SD UPWr” no. N020/0004/22. The APC was funded by Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the management of the Family Allotment Gardens “Wytchenie”, “Radość”, and “Jarzębina”, as well as the allotment holders for making the research areas available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Aendo, P.; Netvichian, R.; Thiendedsakul, P.; Khaodhiar, S.; Tulayakul, P. Carcinogenic Risk of Pb, Cd, Ni, and Cr and Critical Ecological Risk of Cd and Cu in Soil and Groundwater around the Municipal Solid Waste Open Dump in Central Thailand. J. Environ. Public Health 2022, 2022, 3062215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bidar, G.; Pelfrêne, A.; Schwartz, C.; Waterlot, C.; Sahmer, K.; Marot, F.; Douay, F. Urban Kitchen Gardens: Effect of the Soil Contamination and Parameters on the Trace Element Accumulation in Vegetables–A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 738, 139569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aguilera, A.; Cortés, J.L.; Delgado, C.; Aguilar, Y.; Aguilar, D.; Cejudo, R.; Quintana, P.; Goguitchaichvili, A.; Bautista, F. Heavy Metal Contamination (Cu, Pb, Zn, Fe, and Mn) in Urban Dust and its Possible Ecological and Human Health Risk in Mexican Cities. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 854460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stafilov, T.; Stojanova, K.; Tašev, K.; Bačeva Andonovska, K. Accumulation and Distribution of Heavy Metals in Soil and Food Crops in the Pb-Zn Mine Environ. Case Study: Region of Probištip, North Macedonia. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2023, 58, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Haque, M.M.; Niloy, N.M.; Khirul, M.A.; Alam, M.F.; Tareq, S.M. Appraisal of Probabilistic Human Health Risks of Heavy Metals in Vegetables from Industrial, Non-Industrial and Arsenic Contaminated Areas of Bangladesh. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, F.; Yang, H.; Ayyamperumal, R.; Liu, Y. Pollution, Sources, and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Urban Areas Around Industrialization and Urbanization-Northwest China. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Swadi, H.A.; Usman, A.R.A.; Al-Farraj, A.S.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Ahmad, M.; Al-Faraj, A. Sources, Toxicity Potential, and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals-Laden Soil and Dust of Urban and Suburban Areas as Affected by Industrial and Mining Activities. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, N.; Yadav, K.K.; Kumar, V.; Krishnan, S.; Kumar, S.; Nejad, Z.D.; Majeed Khan, M.A.; Alam, J. Evaluating Heavy Metals Contamination in Soil and Vegetables in the Region of North India: Levels, Transfer and Potential Human Health Risk Analysis. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 82, 103563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, N.; Yadav, K.K.; Kumar, V.; Prasad, S.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.S.; Jeon, B.-H.; Kumar, S.; Abdellattif, M.H.; Alsukaibia, A.K.D. Investigation of Heavy Metal Accumulation in Vegetables and Health Risk to Humans from Their Consumption. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 791052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar Sharma, R.; Agrawal, M.; Marshall, F. Heavy Metals in Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites of a Tropical Urban Area of India. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Masuda, J.R.; Zupancic, T.; Poland, B.; Cole, D.C. Environmental health and vulnerable populations in Canada: Mapping an integrated equity-focused research agenda. Can. Geogr./Géogr. Can. 2008, 52, 427–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montaño-López, F.; Biswas, A. Are heavy metals in urban garden soils linked to vulnerable populations? A case study from Guelph, Canada. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ashraf, I.; Ahmad, F.; Sharif, A.; Altaf, A.R.; Teng, H. Heavy Metals Assessment in Water, Soil, Vegetables and their Associated Health Risks via Consumption of Vegetables, District Kasur, Pakistan. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Avila, P.F.; Candeias, C.; Ferreira da Silva, E. Health Risk Assessment through Consumption of Vegetables Rich in Heavy Metals: The Case Study of the Surrounding Villages from Panasqueira Mine, Central Portugal. Environ. Geochem. Health 2016, 39, 565–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bosiacki, M.; Bednorz, L.; Spiżewski, T. Concentration of Heavy Metals in Urban Allotment Soils and their Uptake by Selected Vegetable Crop Species-A Case Study from Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland. J. Elem. 2022, 27, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chary, N.S.; Kamala, C.T.; Raj, D.S.S. Assessing Risk of Heavy Metals from Consuming Food Grown on Sewage Irrigated Soils and Food Chain Transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 69, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chodak, T.; Szerszeń, L.; Kabała, C. Metale Ciężkie w Glebach i Warzywach Ogrodów Działkowych Wrocławia. Zesz. Probl. Postępów Nauk. Rol. 1995, 418, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, Y.; Qiao, M.; Liu, Y. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils and vegetables from wastewater irrigated area, Beijing-Tianjin city cluster, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, J.; Ma, S.; Zhou, J.; Song, Y.; Li, F. Heavy metal contamination in soils and vegetables and health risk assessment of inhabitants in Daye, China. J. Int. Med. Res. 2018, 46, 3374–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Gou, X.; Su, Y.B.; Wang, G. Risk assessment of heavy metals in soils and vegetables around non-ferrous metals mining and smelting sites, Baiyin, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2006, 18, 1124–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barbosa, F., Jr.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Gerlach, R.F.; Parsons, P.J. A Critical Review of Biomarkers Used for Monitoring Human Exposure to Lead: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Needs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1669–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Collin, M.S.; Venkatraman, S.K.; Vijayakumar, N.; Kanimozhi, V.; Arbaaz, S.M.; Stacey, R.G.S.; Anusha, J.; Choudhary, R.; Lvov, V.; Tovar, G.I.; et al. Bioaccumulation of Lead (Pb) and its Effects on Human: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rafati Rahimzadeh, M.; Rafati Rahimzadeh, M.; Kazemi, S.; Moghadamnia, A.-A. Cadmium toxicity and treatment: An update. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 8, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anițaș, S.; Coman, M.; Cioruța, B.-V. Some Considerations Regarding the Presence of Heavy Metals in Soil and the Human Body. Asian Soil Res. J. 2020, 3, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mekonen, N.; Habte, G. Effect of Water and Soil Contamination by Heavy Metals in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa), Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitate), and Turnip (Brassica napus L.) at Different Stage. Ann. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. 2022, 6, 035–040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maslennikov, P.V.; Chupakhina, G.N.; Skrypnik, L.N.; Feduraev, P.V.; Melnik, A.S. The contribution of polyphenols to plant resistance to Pb soil pollution. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 75, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gut, K.; Rogala, D.; Marchwińska-Wyrwał, E. Narażenie na Kadm Konsumentów Warzyw Korzeniowych Uprawianych na Zanieczyszc zonych Glebach Województwa Śląskiego. Med. Ogólna Nauk. Zdrowiu 2017, 23, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaczyńska, A.; Zajączkowski, M.; Grzybiak, M. Toksyczny Wpływ Kadmu na Rośliny i Człowieka. Ann. Acad. Med. Gedanensis 2015, 45, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  29. Angulo-Bejarano, P.I.; Puente-Rivera, J.; Cruz-Ortega, R. Metal and Metalloid Toxicity in Plants: An Overview on Molecular Aspects. Plants 2021, 10, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manara, A.; Fasani, E.; Furini, A.; DalCorso, G. Evolution of the metal hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance traits. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2969–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C.; Schat, H. Mechanisms to Cope with Metal Toxicity in Plants: Adaptive Hyperaccumulation and Tolerance. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 781–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reeves, R.D.; Baker, A.J.M. Metal accumulating plants. In Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean up the Environment; Raskin, I., Finsley, B.D., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 193–229. [Google Scholar]
  33. Van der Ent, A.; Baker, A.J.; Reeves, R.D.; Pollard, A.J.; Schat, H. Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: Facts and fiction. Plant Soil 2013, 362, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. García-Lorenzo, M.L.; Crespo-Feo, E.; Esbrí, J.M.; Higueras, P.; Grau, P.; Crespo, I.; Sánchez-Donoso, R. Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Technosols by Tailings Derived from Pb–Zn–Ag Mining Activities at San Quintín (Ciudad Real, Spain): Some Insights into the Importance of Integral Studies to Evaluate Metal Contamination Pollution Hazards. Minerals 2019, 9, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wróbel, M.; Stojanowska, A.; Nosarzewska, M.; Rutkowski, R.; Rybak, J. The impact of chemical contaminants on biocenosis (ecotoxicological studies). E3S Web Conf. 2019, 100, 00088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wieczorek, J.; Baran, A. Pollution indices and biotests as useful tools for the evaluation of the degree of soil contamination by trace elements. J. Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 559–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sihlahla, M.; Mouri, H.; Nomngongo, P.N. Assessment of bioavailability and mobility of major and trace elements in agricultural soils collected in Port St Johns, Eastern Cape, South Africa using single extraction procedures and pseudo-total digestion. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 1615–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dradrach, A.; Szopka, K.; Karczewska, A. Ecotoxicity of Pore Water in Meadow Soils Affected by Historical Spills of Arsenic-Rich Tailings. Minerals 2020, 10, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paustenbach, D. (Ed.) Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice; Wiley Classics Library; Wiley: Hoboken, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Casado-Martinez, M.C.; Burga-Pérez, K.F.; Bebon, R.; Férard, J.-F.; Vermeirssen, E.L.M.; Werner, I. The Sediment-Contact Test Using the Ostracod Heterocypris Incongruens: Effect of Fine Sediments and Determination of Toxicity Thresholds. Chemosphere 2016, 151, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kokkali, V.; van Delft, W. Overview of Commercially Available Bioassays for Assessing Chemical Toxicity in Aqueous Samples. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 61, 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Karczewska, A.; Kabała, C. Environmental Risk Assessment as a New Basis for Evaluation of Soil Contamination in Polish Law. Soil Sci. Ann. 2017, 68, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Szopka, K.; Gruss, I.; Gruszka, D.; Karczewska, A.; Gediga, K.; Gałka, B.; Dradrach, A. The effects of forest litter and waterlogging on the ecotoxicity of soils strongly enriched in arsenic in a historical mining site. Forests 2021, 12, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lobos-Moysa, E. Ocena stopnia zanieczyszczenia związkami organicznymi Kanału Gliwickiego i jego wybranych dopływów. Proc. ECOpole 2013, 7, 377–383. [Google Scholar]
  45. Antoniadis, V.; Shaheen, S.M.; Levizou, E.; Shahid, M.; Niazi, N.K.; Vithanage, M.; Ok, Y.S.; Bolan, N.; Rinklebe, J. A critical prospective analysis of the potential toxicity of trace element regulation limits in soils worldwide: Are they protective concerning health risk assessment?—A review. Environ. Int. 2019, 127, 819–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kicińska, A.J.; Smreczak, B.; Jadczyszyn, J. Soil Bioavailability of Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc in Areas of Zn-Pb Ore Mining and Processing (Bukowno, Olkusz). J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ruiz, F.; Abad, M.; Bodergat, A.M.; Carbonel, P.; Rodríguez-Lázaro, J.; González-Regalado, M.L.; Toscano, A.; García, E.X.; Prenda, J. Freshwater ostracods as environmental tracers. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grygar, T.M.; Elznicová, J.; Bábek, O.; Hošek, M.; Engel, Z.; Kiss, T. Obtaining Isochrones from Pollution Signals in a Fluvial Sediment Record: A Case Study in a Uranium-Polluted Floodplain of the Ploučnice River, Czech Republic. Appl. Geochem. 2014, 48, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ciszewski, D.; Grygar, T.M. A Review of Flood-Related Storage and Remobilization of Heavy Metal Pollutants in River Systems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tan, K. Soil Sampling, Preparation, and Analysis, 2nd ed.; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  51. ISO 17586:2016; Soil Quality—Determination of the Potentially Bioavailable Fraction of Metals and Metalloid—Pseudo Total Extraction Method. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  52. ISO 19730:2008; Soil Quality—Extraction of Trace Elements Using Ammonium Nitrate Solution. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  53. FAIRsharing.org. USDA Soil Taxonomy Classification Guide. Available online: https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.670b83 (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  54. Ministry of the Environment. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 1 September 2016 on the Method of Assessing Soil Surface Contamination. Dz.U. 2016, 1395. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  55. Belanger, S.; Barron, M.; Craig, P.; Dyer, S.; Galay-Burgos, M.; Hamer, M.; Marshall, S.; Posthuma, L.; Raimondo, S.; Whitehouse, P. Future Needs and Recommendations in the Development of Species Sensitivity Distributions: Estimating Toxicity Thresholds for Aquatic Ecological Communities and Assessing Impacts of Chemical Exposures. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2016, 12, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Carlon, C. Derivation Methods of Soil Screening Values in Europe. A Review and Evaluation of National Procedures Towards Harmonization; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, ISPRA: Via Enrico Fermi, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chernova, O.; Beketskaya, O. Permissible and Background Concentrations of Pollutants in Environmental Regulation (Heavy Metals and Other Chemical Elements). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2011, 44, 1008–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Government of Ontario. Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Available online: https://www.ontario.ca (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  59. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (CEQGs). Available online: https://www.cme.ca (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  60. Attanayake, C.P.; Hettiarachchi, G.M.; Harms, A.; Presley, D.; Martin, S.; Pierzynski, G.M. Field Evaluations on Soil Plant Transfer of Lead from an Urban Garden Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mitchell, R.G.; Spliethoff, H.M.; Ribaudo, L.N.; Lopp, D.M.; Shayler, H.A.; Marquez-Bravo, L.G.; Lambert, V.T.; Ferenz, G.S.; Russell-Anelli, J.M.; Stone, E.B.; et al. Lead (Pb) and other metals in New York City community garden soils: Factors influencing contaminant distributions. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 187, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kabala, C.; Chodak, T.; Szerszen, L. Factors Influencing the Concentration of Heavy Metals in Soils of Allotment Gardens in the City of Wroclaw, Poland. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2009, 18, 1118–1124. [Google Scholar]
  63. Antoniadis, V.; Shaheen, S.M.; Boersch, J.; Frohne, T.; Du Laing, G.; Rinklebe, J. Bioavailability and Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Garden Edible Vegetables and Soils around a Highly Contaminated Former Mining Area in Germany. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Karczewska, A.; Bogda, A.; Gałka, B.; Szulc, A.; Czwarkiel, D.; Duszyńska, D. Natural and anthropogenic soil enrichment in heavy metals in areas of former metallic ore mining in the Sudety Mts. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 2006, 39, 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tipping, E.; Rieuwerts, J.; Pan, G.; Ashmore, M.R.; Lofts, S.; Hill, M.T.R.; Farago, M.E.; Thornton, I. The solid–solution partitioning of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in upland soils of England and Wales. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 125, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Römkens, P.F.; Guo, H.Y.; Chu, C.L.; Liu, T.S.; Chiang, C.F.; Koopmans, G.F. Characterization of soil heavy metal pools in paddy fields in Taiwan: Chemical extraction and solid-solution partitioning. J. Soils Sediments 2009, 9, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pinto, F.A.; Ferracciú Alleoni, L.R. Extractors for barium, cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in tropical soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 2478–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schuijt, L.M.; Peng, F.-J.; van den Berg, S.J.P.; Dingemans, M.M.L.; Van den Brink, P.J. (Eco)toxicological Tests for Assessing Impacts of Chemical Stress to Aquatic Ecosystems: Facts, Challenges, and Future. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rashid, A.; Schutte, B.J.; Ulery, A.; Deyholos, M.K.; Sanogo, S.; Lehnhoff, E.A.; Beck, L. Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soil: Environmental Pollutants Affecting Crop Health. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ding, C.; Chen, J.; Zhu, F.; Chai, L.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, K.; Shi, Y. Biological Toxicity of Heavy Metal(loid)s in Natural Environments: From Microbes to Humans. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 920957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pueyo, M.; López-Sánchez, J.; Rauret, G. Assessment of CaCl2, NaNO3 and NH4NO3 extraction procedures for the study of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn extractability in contaminated soils. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 504, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area.
Figure 1. Location of the study area.
Toxics 12 00873 g001
Figure 2. The length of the test organisms in μm after 6 days of incubation. Values were compared using ANOVA (p < 0.05). The significance of the differences between sampling points was evaluated using the post hoc Tukey test. Different lowercase letters on the graph indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 2. The length of the test organisms in μm after 6 days of incubation. Values were compared using ANOVA (p < 0.05). The significance of the differences between sampling points was evaluated using the post hoc Tukey test. Different lowercase letters on the graph indicate significant differences between treatments.
Toxics 12 00873 g002
Figure 3. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of Heterocypris incongruens: relationship between the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of individuals (based on Growth Inhibition Response) and total Pb concentrations in Soil. Note: The pink band represents the confidence interval, the grey band represents the prediction interval, and the red curve represents the fitted polynomial model.
Figure 3. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of Heterocypris incongruens: relationship between the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of individuals (based on Growth Inhibition Response) and total Pb concentrations in Soil. Note: The pink band represents the confidence interval, the grey band represents the prediction interval, and the red curve represents the fitted polynomial model.
Toxics 12 00873 g003
Table 2. Contents of total and available forms of heavy metals in the examined soils (extraction in 1 M NH4NO3 and 0.43 M HNO3).
Table 2. Contents of total and available forms of heavy metals in the examined soils (extraction in 1 M NH4NO3 and 0.43 M HNO3).
Total Concentration of Selected Trace Elements (mg/kg, Soil Dry Mass)
No. of Sampling PointZnCuPbCd
1222.0045.0056.001.00
23465.00157.00170.004.00
31739.00322.00214.005.00
41384.00232.00237.006.00
51290.00219.00222.006.00
61304.00266.00351.002.00
71098.00216.00329.002.00
81059.00234.00402.002.00
Available Forms of Trace Metals Extracted in 0.43 M HNO3 (mg/kg, Soil Dry Mass)
No. of Sampling PointZnCuPbCd
1----
2394.4077.30119.902.90
31079.00140.30132.603.50
41090.00186.20206.706.10
51060.00182.20189.606.30
6486.6081.00126.800.70
7493.4085.30158.400.70
8613.2096.40129.100.80
Available Forms of Trace Metals Extracted in 1 M NH4NO3 (mg/kg, Soil Dry Mass)
No. of Sampling PointZnCuPbCd
1----
20.550.25<0.0050<0.0050
32.550.50<0.0050<0.0050
40.850.68<0.00500.03
50.650.95<0.00500.03
60.200.28<0.0050<0.0050
70.180.30<0.0050<0.0050
80.050.43<0.0050<0.0050
Note: Heavy metal concentration values that exceed the permitted limits established in Polish legislation [54] are highlighted in grey cells; permissible limits for Zn: 1000 (mg/kg), Cu: 300 (mg/kg), P: 500 (mg/kg), Cd: 5 (mg/kg) in clay soils with a neutral reaction used to grow plants and vegetables. Note: In July 2014, the Polish Law on Environmental Protection and the Law on Prevention of Environmental Damage and its remediation introduced new provisions, changing the approach to assessing the state of soil contamination and the principles of remediation, incorporating environmental risk assessment.
Table 3. Pearson correlation between growth inhibition and total, as well as available, forms of heavy metals in examined soils (extraction in 1 M NH4NO3 and HNO3).
Table 3. Pearson correlation between growth inhibition and total, as well as available, forms of heavy metals in examined soils (extraction in 1 M NH4NO3 and HNO3).
Zn
Pearson Corr.p-Value
Total−0.05520.7092
Available in NH4NO3−0.43600.0020
Available in HNO3−0.28990.0456
Cu
Pearson Corr.p-Value
Total0.14470.3266
Available in NH4NO3−0.27120.0623
Available in HNO3−0.27720.0565
Pb
Pearson Corr.p-Value
Total0.6715<0.0001
Available in NH4NO30.28580.0489
Available in HNO30.03560.8103
Cd
Pearson Corr.p-Value
Total−0.5406<0.0001
Available in NH4NO3−0.27820.0555
Available in HNO3−0.5753<0.0001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gruszka, D.; Gruss, I.; Szopka, K. Assessing Environmental Risks of Local Contamination of Garden Urban Soils with Heavy Metals Using Ecotoxicological Tests. Toxics 2024, 12, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120873

AMA Style

Gruszka D, Gruss I, Szopka K. Assessing Environmental Risks of Local Contamination of Garden Urban Soils with Heavy Metals Using Ecotoxicological Tests. Toxics. 2024; 12(12):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gruszka, Dariusz, Iwona Gruss, and Katarzyna Szopka. 2024. "Assessing Environmental Risks of Local Contamination of Garden Urban Soils with Heavy Metals Using Ecotoxicological Tests" Toxics 12, no. 12: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120873

APA Style

Gruszka, D., Gruss, I., & Szopka, K. (2024). Assessing Environmental Risks of Local Contamination of Garden Urban Soils with Heavy Metals Using Ecotoxicological Tests. Toxics, 12(12), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop