Next Article in Journal
Characterization of PM2.5 Carbonaceous Components in a Typical Industrial City in China under Continuous Mitigation Measures
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Response of the Soil Bacterial Community and Lettuce Growth in a Fluorine and Cadmium Co-Contaminated Yellow Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Different Thiamethoxam Concentrations on Riptortus pedestris Development and Fecundity

by
Zijie Wang
1,2,†,
Song Wang
1,†,
Lixia Li
1,
Lei Chen
1,
Yu Gao
1,3,*,
Ming Yuan
4,
Yueying Wang
5,* and
Shusen Shi
1,3
1
College of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
Jiamusi Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiamusi 154007, China
3
Key Laboratory of Soybean Disease and Pest Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Changchun 130118, China
4
Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qiqihar 161006, China
5
Suzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Suzhou 234099, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2024, 12(7), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070460
Submission received: 11 May 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024

Abstract

:
The stink bug, Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Alydidae), is a highly destructive pest that significantly damages legume crops in East and South Asia. Neonicotinoid insecticides containing thiamethoxam are widely used to control R. pedestris in soybean fields. However, the current knowledge on the impact of different thiamethoxam concentrations on R. pedestris growth and reproduction is lacking and insufficient. The present study investigated the effects of thiamethoxam on the biological traits of R. pedestris after treatment with LC10 (19.8 mg/L), LC20 (31.6 mg/L), LC30 (44.2 mg/L), LC40 (58.9 mg/L), and LC50 (77.0 mg/L) concentrations. These five thiamethoxam concentrations (LC10~LC50) reduced adult longevity and fecundity in the F1 generation females. Thiamethoxam treatment also significantly decreased the population trend index, intrinsic rate of increase, net reproductive rate, gross reproductive rate, and finite rate of increase and increased the mean generation time. These results show that thiamethoxam hinders and suppresses the development and growth of the F1 population of R. pedestris. Thiamethoxam is recommended for spray control during peak adult emergence, as it not only has a controlling effect on the parental generation but also a negative impact on the F1 generations.

1. Introduction

The global population is projected to reach 9 billion by 2050; with its continuous growth, it is important to consider how we can achieve food security [1]. Consequently, increasing crop yield has become a global scientific concern [2,3]. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is an important grain and oil crop native to China [4]. Soybean crop production is at risk due to the presence of harmful organisms, including insects, weeds, and pathogens [5,6,7]. Many studies have shown that insect pests are the most important factors limiting soybean yield worldwide [5,8,9]. In recent years, the soybean plants of a large area in the Huang-Huai-Hai region of China have presented stay-green syndrome (known as the “Zhengqing” problem in Chinese), with delayed leaf senescence (stay-green), flat pods, and aborted seeds, causing significant economic losses [10,11,12]. At least three types of causal factors associated with stay-green syndrome have been discovered to date: the bean stinkbug Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Alydidae), which pierces and sucks soybean pods at the R3–R5 stages (from the beginning of pod development to the beginning of seed development) [13,14]; the novel soybean stay-green-associated geminivirus (SoSGV) [15,16,17]; and the virus-transmitting leafhopper, Orosius orientalis (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) [18,19].
R. pedestris is a devastating pest affecting legume crops in East and South Asia [20,21] that is known to attack over 30 plant species of about 13 families and prefers legume crops, such as soybean, mung bean (Vigna radiata L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) [22,23]. Although sustainable pest control methods are being developed [24,25,26], the most efficient measure remains spraying chemical insecticides from the flowering to the pod-filling stage [27,28]. However, the extensive use of insecticides could rapidly increase insecticide resistance [29]. Some insecticides are present at sublethal concentrations after application [30,31]. Sublethal insecticide concentrations, which are insufficient for killing insects, can affect population growth parameters, insect feeding behavior, and nutrient content [32,33]. Previous studies have shown that insecticides, including those containing thiamethoxam (CAS: 153719-23-4), can be used to control R. pedestris [28,34]. However, the impact of different thiamethoxam concentrations on R. pedestris development and reproduction remains unclear [34]. Therefore, evaluating the concentration effects and overall impact of thiamethoxam on the target pests will aid in scientifically assessing the efficacy of thiamethoxam against R. pedestris in field conditions. The lack of knowledge on the sublethal effects of thiamethoxam poses a major challenge in R. pedestris management. Our aim was to investigate the potential effects of different thiamethoxam concentrations on R. pedestris and to provide a guide on effective insecticide uses in the field. The development parameters, including the developmental duration, pre-oviposition period, longevity, larval and adult survival rate, and daily egg production of individual females of R. pedestris, were measured using five thiamethoxam concentrations under laboratory conditions. The population parameters, including the survival rate, fecundity, life expectancy, and reproduction value of R. pedestris, were calculated using the age–stage, two-sex life table.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects and Soybean Plants

The R. pedestris adults were originally collected from soybean fields in Guizhou Province, China (26°30′15″ N, 106°39′19″ E). The adults used in the bioassays were obtained after more than ten generations of continuous laboratory rearing, according to the method described by Tian et al. (2022), at 25 ± 1 °C, 80 ± 5% R.H., and a photoperiod of 16–8 h (light–dark) [35]. Soybean seeds (cultivar “Jinong 38”) were planted in a greenhouse according to the method described by Gao et al. (2022) [23] and used as feed for R. pedestris.

2.2. Toxicity Bioassay

The thiamethoxam formulation (25%, water-dispersible granules) was purchased from Yuelian Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and stored in a refrigerator (4 ± 2 °C). Six thiamethoxam concentrations (33.0, 67.0, 100.0, 133.0, 167.0, and 200.0 mg/L) were prepared via serial dilution in distilled water. Thirty-five-day-old fresh soybean pods of uniform size were selected [34], thoroughly washed with clean water, and dried at room temperature. These whole pods were immersed in the serially diluted thiamethoxam solutions for 20 s and then dried at room temperature. A single pod was then released into a centrifuge tube (50 mL) [35] (Figure S1). After 24 h of starvation, five female and five male 3-day-old adults were placed in each centrifuge tube. The pods immersed only in distilled water were used as the control treatment. Three replicates were maintained for each treatment. The number of dead R. pedestris was counted after 24 h. Insect mortality was assessed under a stereomicroscope (SZ-61, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and confirmed by the absence of an obvious reaction when the antennae, head, abdomen, legs, and other sensitive parts were lightly touched with a writing brush [34]; the mortality in all control treatments was below 5%.

2.3. Effects of Thiamethoxam on the F1 Generation of R. pedestris

R. pedestris adults were collected and treated with LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LD50 concentrations of thiamethoxam (19.8 mg/L, 31.6 mg/L, 44.2 mg/L, 58.9 mg/L, and 77.0 mg/L, see Section 3.1—Results), and the samples treated with water were the control group. All exposed samples were considered the parental generation. Soybean seeds of a similar size were selected and soaked in water until soft [34], washed thoroughly with clean water, and dried at room temperature. The whole seeds were dipped in the serially diluted solutions of thiamethoxam (LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50) for 20 s and then dried at room temperature. After 24 h, the live samples of each treatment were reared separately in a single cage (30 cm × 30 cm). The insect cages were placed in an artificial climate room with a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, 80 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 16–8 h (light–dark) photoperiod [35].
Following the thiamethoxam treatment of the R. pedestris parental generation, 120 healthy eggs were collected and transferred to a Petri dish covered with wet filter paper and incubated in an artificial climate chamber (GXZ-380B, Jiangnan Instrument Factory, Ningbo, China). The newly hatched F1 generation nymphs were reared in a single centrifuge tube (50 mL) (Figure S1) under the same environmental conditions as above. The individual mortality at each stage was observed and recorded daily. The number of eggs laid was recorded daily until the death of adult females and males. The development time, adult longevity, and daily egg production of individual females of the F1 generation under each treatment were recorded daily.

2.4. Life Table Parameters

The life table parameters were calculated following the age–stage, two-sex life table procedure (the TWOSEX–MSChart program) using the above-recorded data [36]. The population parameters are calculated using Equations (1) and (2), where k represents the number of life stages [37,38,39,40,41].
l x = j = 1 k s x j
m x = j = 1 k s x j f x j j = 1 k s x j
The net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), mean generation time (T), age–stage life expectancy (exj), and age–stage reproductive value (vxj) were calculated using Equations (3)–(8), respectively.
R 0 = x = 0 l x m x
x = 0 e r ( x + 1 ) l x m x = 1
λ = e r
T = ln ( R 0 ) r
e x j = i = x n j = y m s i j
v x j = e r ( x + 1 ) s x j i = x e r ( i + 1 ) y = j k s i y f i y
The population trend index is expressed as Equation (9) [23], where I is the population trend index; N1 and N0 are the number of F1 and parental generations of R. pedestris, respectively; SE, S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 are the R. pedestris survival rates of eggs and the 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-instar nymphs, respectively; SA is the survival rate of adults; F is the average number of eggs laid per female; and P is the proportion of female adults. I > 1 indicates that the next-generation population is higher than the previous one; I < 1 means that the next generation will be smaller than the previous one [35].
I = N1/N0 = SE × S1 × S2 × S3 × S4 × S5 × SA × F × P

2.5. Statistical Analyses

The values, slopes, and estimated values of the LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 (semilethal concentrations) were analyzed via the probability model using the Data Processing System (DPS) software (version 13.5, Hangzhou Ruifeng Information Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China; website: http://www.dpsw.cn/ (accessed on 22 June 2024) [42]. Significant differences between the treatments in the developmental duration and the life table parameters were determined via a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Significant differences between the longevity of females and males were determined via the t-test. The SigmaPlot software (version 12.5, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used to generate the figures.

3. Results

3.1. Toxicity Bioassay of Thiamethoxam

The regression equation applied using the DPS software was y = 2.18x + 7.42 (χ2 = 0.9007, p = 0.9245, R = 0.9843) (Table 1). The LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 of thiamethoxam for R. pedestris adults were 19.8 mg/L, 31.6 mg/L, 44.2 mg/L, 58.9 mg/L, and 77.0 mg/L, respectively, after 24 h. The 95% confidence limits are 7.8~31.5, 15.9~44.9, 26.4~58.6, 40.1~74.3, and 58.0~94.8, respectively. These concentrations of thiamethoxam solutions were then used as the treated concentrations for the follow-up experiments.

3.2. Effects of Thiamethoxam on the F1 Generation of R. pedestris

Thiamethoxam at different concentrations (LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50) significantly influenced the duration of each nymphal developmental stage, adult longevity, adult preoviposition period (APOP), total preoviposition period (TPOP), and population trend index (I) of the R. pedestris F1 generation (Table 1 and Table S1). For eggs, the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, the nymph period, and the total pre-adult stage, increasing thiamethoxam concentrations prolonged the developmental duration. These thiamethoxam treatment values were higher than those of the control treatment (Fegg = 107.96, p < 0.0001; F2nd instar nymph = 19.16, p < 0.0001; F3rd instar nymph = 28.59, p < 0.0001; F4th instar nymph = 39.59, p < 0.0001; F5th instar nymph = 82.90, p < 0.0001; Fnymph period = 852.84, p < 0.0001; and Ftotal pre-adult stage = 106.15, p < 0.0001). The developmental duration of first-instar nymphs under the LC30 treatment was significantly longer than that under other treatments (F1st instar nymph = 11.92, p = 0.0003). The longevity of both female and male adults decreased significantly with increasing thiamethoxam concentrations (Ffemale adult = 7.268, p = 0.0024; Fmale adult = 8.626, p = 0.011) and was the shortest under the LC30 treatment. There was no significant difference between males and females at the same concentration (control: p = 0.5015; LC10: p = 0.4778; LC20: p = 0.1973; LC30: p = 0.119; LC40: p = 0.4327; and LC50: p = 0.3625). The APOP of the LC10 treatment was significantly longer than that of the control treatment (F = 14.44, p < 0.0001). The LC40 and LC50 treatments prolonged the TPOP (43.40 ± 0.29 days and 44.00 ± 0.53 days) when compared with the control treatment (F = 40.35, p < 0.0001).
The population parameters of the R. pedestris F1 generation are listed in Table 2. The intrinsic rate of increase (r), net reproductive rate (R0), finite rate of increase (λ), and gross reproductive rate (GRR) decreased with increasing thiamethoxam concentrations (Frm = 3.917, p = 0.0245; Fλ = 4.068, p = 0.0216; FR0 = 6.555, p = 0.0037; and FGRR = 5.835, p = 0.0058); these values were significantly lower than those of the control treatment. The LC40 treatment demonstrated a higher mean generation time (T) (53.6654 ± 2.2354 days) than the control (43.9912 ± 3.4052 days). For the gross reproductive rate, there was no significant difference among the LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 treatments (F = 6.422, p = 0.004). This observation indicated that five thiamethoxam concentrations caused different degrees of adverse effects on the population parameters of R. pedestris.

3.3. Age–Stage-Specific Survival Rate (Sxj)

R. pedestris completed generational development under the five tested thiamethoxam concentrations (LC10~LC50). The age–stage-specific survival rates of the first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs and adult females and males in the LC10~LC50 treatments were shorter than those in the control treatment (Figure 1). The developmental duration of females was shorter than those of males in the control, LC10, LC20, and LC30 treatments. However, the developmental duration of males was shorter than that of females at LC40 and LC50 concentrations. These observations suggest that adult males may be more sensitive to high thiamethoxam concentrations than females and therefore more susceptible to lethality. The survival rates at each developmental stage initially increased and then decreased as the concentration increased from LC10 to LC50. The survival rates were the highest in the control treatment and the lowest in the LC50 treatment; the survival rate values were 68.33%, 51.67%, 33.33%, 26.67%, and 21.67% under the control treatment and 40.00%, 31.67%, 21.67%, 15.83%, and 10.83% under the LC50 treatment for the first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively. An apparent overlap in the age–stage survival curves was observed due to the individual differences in mortality under different thiamethoxam concentrations. These results indicate that thiamethoxam in the five concentrations negatively influences the survival rate and duration of the F1 generation of R. pedestris, with males being more affected than females.

3.4. Age-Specific Survivability and Age–Stage-Specific Fecundity

The age-specific survival rate (lx) decreased sharply with the increasing age of the test insects within each thiamethoxam concentration tested from LC10 to LC50 (Figure 2). The age–stage-specific fecundity (mx) ceased (no further oviposition) at ages (day) of 73, 66, 56, 68, 67, and 68 for the CK, LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 treatments, respectively. Moreover, the highest age-specific fecundities were recorded: 2.1667 (69 day, CK), 0.5000 (46 day, LC10), 0.5714 (42 day, LC20), 0.5625 (47/51 day, LC30), 0.6923 (53 day, LC40), and 0.5833 (50 day, LC50) eggs. The peak values of age-specific maternity (lxmx) were 0.2167 at 47 day, 0.0833 at 46 day, 0.0667 at 41~42 day, 0.075 at 47/51 day, 0.075 at 53 day, and 0.0583 at 46/50 day for the CK, LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 treatments, respectively.

3.5. Age–Stage-Specific Life Expectancy

The life expectancy (exj) value of a given stage decreased with increasing concentrations and, for the same thiamethoxam concentration, decreased with increasing age (Figure 3). The highest life expectancy of female adults was 34.6429 (26 day) under LC10, and the lowest was 18.9529 under LC20 (26 day) (Figure 3). Similarly, the highest life expectancy of male adults was 27.6496 under LC10 (29 day), and the lowest life expectancy was 19.7733 under LC20 (39 day).

3.6. Age–Stage-Specific Reproductive Values

The age–stage-specific reproductive values (vxj) gradually increased with increasing age (x) and stage (j) (Figure 4). The first vxj values from female adults were detected at 24 day (CK), 26 day (LC10), 26 day (LC20), 27 day (LC30), 35 day (LC40), and 36 day (LC50). The highest vxj values of female adults occurred at 39 day (20.8419 d−1), 40 day (8.9443 d−1), 26 day (11.3011 d−1), 41 day (7.7804 d−1), 42 day (11.2579 d−1), and 36 day (9.4834 d−1) of age.

4. Discussion

In this study, the logarithm of the mortality rate of the test insects versus the concentration is in the form of a cumulative times curve. Thus, the DPS software was used to transform the relationship into a straight line to facilitate the subsequent calculations. The life table, which is an effective method for studying the population dynamics of arthropods [43], is used to more accurately investigate the potential effects of different thiamethoxam concentrations on R. pedestris. The age–stage, two-sex life table overcomes the limitations of traditional life tables by considering the age differentiation of insects and incorporating all individuals within the population. This approach facilitates an accurate depiction of age stratification, predicts population growth trends, and provides a correct analysis of parameters, including the reproduction rate [38,39]. Utilizing this technique offers an effective means to access the impact of external environmental factors on the population dynamics of R. pedestris, such as the temperatures, host plants, and insecticides [32,35]. In our study, plotting the sxj, lx, mx, lxmx, and exj curves revealed the adverse effects of thiamethoxam at LC10~LC50 concentrations on the F1 population growth parameters of R. pedestris using the age–stage, two-sex life table. After the LC10~LC50 treatments of parental adult R. pedestris, the population trend index, survival rate, longevity, and fecundity of the F1 generation populations of R. pedestris significantly decreased. Our results indicated that the F1 generation showed a longer developmental period; lower rm, λ, and R0 values; and a longer mean generation time after the parental generation nymphs were treated. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) of the LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 treatments reflected the reproductive capacity of the R. pedestris population after thiamethoxam treatment under ideal conditions. Similarly, the effects of thiamethoxam on life table parameters have been reported in several hemipteran insects or their natural enemies, such as Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) (Delphacidae) [44], Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Aphididae) [45], Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Delphacidae) [46], Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Aphididae) [47], and Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter (Miridae), an important predator of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Delphacidae) [48]. These findings highlight that the surviving individuals experience a decline in survival suitability after insecticide treatment [49]. Insecticides at decreased concentrations can seriously affect the population growth of exposed insects [50]. A significant reduction in the population parameters was also observed in Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) and Aphis gossypii Glover (Aphididae) after exposure to sublethal concentrations [51,52]. Therefore, a systematic description of the effects of thiamethoxam in different concentrations, including changes in developmental stages and fecundity, will contribute to effective thiamethoxam use [53].
Depending on the biological trait studied, either positive or negative effects were observed at the individual (intra-generational) and transgenerational levels [54]. This study demonstrated that thiamethoxam has notable effects on the progeny of the directly exposed individuals, referred to as transgenerational effects. Following parental exposure to the LC10~LC50 concentrations of thiamethoxam, the fecundity of the progeny decreased compared to the control. Furthermore, the thiamethoxam treatment of the parental generation of adult R. pedestris had a more potent adverse effect on the F1 generation than it did on the third-instar nymphs [34]. A similar study showed that the LC30 concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin and emamectin benzoate exhibited a transgenerational effect on the third-instar nymphs of R. pedestris [32]. Lethal, sublethal, and transgenerational effects of the neonicotinoid insecticides have also been reported on many economic insects, such as Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür) (Miridae) [55], Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coccinellidae) [56], Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coccinellidae) [57], and N. lugens (Stål) [58]. Moreover, the LD20 concentration of imidacloprid and dinotefuran significantly benefited N. lugens (Stål) [59]. These pests were likely exposed to relatively low concentrations of insecticides under real field conditions. The side effects or sublethal toxicity of insecticides are nearly as severe as their lethal toxicity against insects [60]. Assessing insecticide effects on insect development and reproduction, especially at the multigenerational level, provides data for understanding the potential relationship between insecticide use and insect occurrence [61,62,63]. Our results can provide a reference for further improving the evaluation of thiamethoxam’s field control effectiveness. Thiamethoxam and other neonicotinoid insecticides are used for controlling agricultural and forestry pests worldwide [64,65]. Thiamethoxam has been demonstrated as an excellent organic pesticide [66]; however, the mechanism of action of thiamethoxam against the parental and F1 generations of R. pedestris requires further investigation.
Applying chemical pesticides is still the most common pest control measure [6]. The selection pressure of insecticides containing thiamethoxam is high in soybean fields in Northern China, which are sprayed two or four times during the flowering stage [10,13]. In addition, thiamethoxam is applied through seed coating in soybean and does not affect seed germination [67]. Thiamethoxam and its main metabolite (clothianidin) exhibited a less notable effect on nontarget piercing–sucking herbivores and the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) [68,69]. Thiamethoxam is a degradable pesticide that has a half-life period of 7.1–92.3 days in European field soil [70]. To date, no surveillance data indicate the increased moderate-to-high levels of thiamethoxam resistance in the field populations of R. pedestris. Therefore, the risk of R. pedestris developing resistance to thiamethoxam warrants further study. In addition to the acute effects that typically occur at high concentrations, the sublethal and transgenerational effects in pest populations can occur over time. Thus, field studies are necessary to conclude the potential role of this insecticide in suppressing pest populations. Although these findings need to be validated under real cropping conditions, along with the acute effects that typically occur at high dosages, it is expected that sublethal and transgenerational effects may occur in pest populations over time due to the current pesticide applications. Our data will help understand the effects of thiamethoxam on the lifecycle of R. pedestris and formulate long-term, effective control strategies to mitigate insecticide resistance.

5. Conclusions

We conducted an indoor study to investigate the impact of various thiamethoxam concentrations on the biological characteristics of the parental and F1 generations of R. pedestris. The five concentrations of thiamethoxam significantly decreased the survival rate and fecundity of the F1 generation of R. pedestris. Thiamethoxam treatment also significantly reduced the population trend index, intrinsic rate of increase, net reproductive rate, and finite rate of increase and increased the generation time, which suggests that the field control of the parental generation of adult R. pedestris using thiamethoxam still has a sustained controlling effect on their F1 generation population. Thiamethoxam is recommended for spray control during the adult peak emergence. The results can provide a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of R. pedestris and the scientific and effective use of thiamethoxam.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics12070460/s1, Figure S1: Schematic sketch of the self-made device. Table S1: Effects of different thiamethoxam concentrations on the life table parameters of Riptortus pedestris.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; methodology, Y.G. and S.S.; software, Y.G. and Z.W.; investigation, Z.W., L.L., L.C. and Y.G.; data curation, Z.W. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.W., Y.G., S.W., Y.W. and M.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.G., Z.W., S.W., M.Y., Y.W., S.S. and Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Earmarked Fund for the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (Grant No. CARS04), the Applied Technology Research and Development Plan of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. GA22B014).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Long Wang for managing the plants daily and Zilong Liu for drawing the diagrammatic sketch of the device.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Tyczewska, A.; Woźniak, E.; Gracz, J.; Kuczyński, J.; Twardowski, T. Towards food security: Current state and future prospects of agrobiotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 1219–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gardner, A.S.; Maclean, I.M.D.; Gaston, K.J.; Bütikofer, L. Forecasting future crop suitability with microclimate data. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiong, E.H.; Qu, X.L.; Li, J.F.; Liu, H.L.; Ma, H.; Zhang, D.; Chu, S.S.; Jiao, Y.Q. The soybean ubiquitin-proteasome system: Current knowledge and future perspective. Plant Genome 2023, 16, e20281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bao, A.L.; Zhang, C.J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.F.; Zhou, X.; Cao, D. Genome editing technology and application in soybean improvement. Oil Crop Sci. 2020, 5, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oerke, E.C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.; Shi, S.S.; Xu, M.L.; Cui, J. Current research on soybean pest management in China. Oil Crop Sci. 2018, 3, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chang, K.F.; Hwang, S.F.; Ahmed, H.U.; Zhou, Q.; Strelkov, S.E.; Conner, R.L.; McLaren, D.L.; Henriquez, M.A.; Harding, M.W.; Turnbull, G.D. First report of Phytophthora sojae causing root rot in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Alberta, Canada. Crop Protect. 2017, 91, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marchi-Werle, L.; Pereira, R.R.; Reese, J.C.; Reese, J.C.; Heng-Moss, T.M.; Hunt, T.E. Yield response of tolerant and susceptible soybean to the soybean aphid. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishimoto, M.; Iwata, D. Effects of the continuous cropping of soybean plants on the occurrence of soybean pod borer, Leguminivora glycinivorella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Jpn. J. App. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 62, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, K.; Zhang, X.X.; Guo, J.Q.; Penn, H.; Wu, T.T.; Li, L.; Jiang, H.; Chang, L.D.; Wu, C.X.; Han, T.F. Feeding of Riptortus pedestris on soybean plants, the primary cause of soybean staygreen syndrome in the Huang-Huai-Hai river basin. Crop J. 2019, 7, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.X.; Wang, M.; Wu, T.T.; Wu, C.X.; Jiang, B.J.; Guo, C.H.; Han, T.F. Physiological and molecular studies of staygreen caused by pod removal and seed injury in soybean. Crop J. 2016, 4, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wei, Z.Y.; Guo, W.B.; Jiang, S.S.; Yan, D.K.; Shi, Y.; Wu, B.; Xin, X.Q.; Chen, L.; Cai, Y.P.; Zhang, H.H.; et al. Transcriptional profiling reveals a critical role for GmFT2a in soybean staygreen syndrome caused by the pest Riptortus pedestris. New Phytol. 2022, 237, 1876–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.J.; Gao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.P.; Shi, S.S. Field cage assessment of feeding damage by Riptortus pedestris on soybeans in China. Insects 2021, 12, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shan, S.Q.; Huang, Y.; Guo, C.Y.; Hu, B.; Zhang, H.H.; Li, Y.J.; Chen, J.P.; Wei, Z.Y.; Sun, Z.T. A salivary secretory protein from Riptortus pedestris facilitates pest infestation and soybean staygreen syndrome. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 24, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, R.; Mei, R.; Yan, R.; Chen, H.Y.; Miao, D.; Cai, L.N.; Fan, J.Y.; Li, G.R.; Xu, R.; Lu, W.G.; et al. A new distinct geminivirus causes soybean stay-green disease. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 927–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.L.; Wang, M.X.; Wang, L.K.; Feng, H.; He, X.; Chang, S.; Wang, D.P.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; An, G.Y.; et al. Whole-plant microbiome profiling reveals a novel geminivirus associated with soybean stay-green disease. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 2159–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Q.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Lu, W.G.; Han, X.Y.; Yang, L.L.; Shi, Y.J.; Li, H.L.; Chen, L.L.; Liu, Y.Q.; Yang, X.; et al. Identifcation and characterization of a new geminivirus from soybean plants and determination of V2 as a pathogenicity factor and silencing suppressor. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yin, J.L.; Hu, Z.Z.; Xu, S.Q.; Hong, X.; Qiu, Y.L.; Cheng, X.H.; Wang, L.Q.; Shen, W.L.; Zhi, H.J.; Li, K.; et al. Leafhopper transmits soybean stay-green associated virus to leguminous plants. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, R.; Yan, R.; Mei, R.; Wang, Y.D.; Niu, W.; Ai, H.; Qi, S.J.; Xu, M.X.; Yu, G.; Ye, W.W.; et al. Epidemiological evaluation and identification of the insect vector of soybean stay-green associated virus. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kho, J.W.; Jung, M.; Lee, D.H. Evaluating the efficacy of two insect detection methods with Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae): Portable harmonic radar system and fluorescent marking system. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahn, J.J.; Choi, K.S. Population parameters and growth of Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Alydidae) under fluctuating temperature. Insects 2022, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Raju, R.M.; Arifunnahar, M.; Mostafiz, M.M.; Ali, M.D.; Hossain, M.A.; Talamas, E.J. Hadronotus pubescens (Motschoulsky) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae): Redescription, biological attributes, and parasitism on eggs of Riptortus pedestris (Fab.) (Hemiptera, Alydidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2022, 94, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, Y.L.; Tian, X.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, J.B.; Shi, S.S. Laboratory evaluation of leguminous plants for the development and reproduction of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Entomol. Sci. 2022, 5, e12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.T.; Lee, S.J.; Nai, Y.S.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.S. Up-regulation of carbon metabolism-related glyoxylate cycle and toxin production in Beauveria bassiana JEF-007 during infection of bean bug, Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 1236–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Win, T.; Lee, J.Y.; Woo, R.M.; Woo, S.D. Screening and evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi against the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris using multiple tools. Entomol. Res. 2022, 52, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Song, J.; Lee, G.; Jung, J.; Monn, J.K.; Kim, S. Effect of soybean volatiles on the behavior of the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris. J. Chem. Ecol. 2022, 48, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lim, U.T. Occurrence and control method of Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae): Korean perspectives. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 52, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.J.; Tian, X.Y.; Li, W.B.; Gao, Y.; Shi, S.S. Indoor biological activity and field effect of five kinds of insecticides to Riptortus pedestris. Agrochemicals 2020, 59, 537–540, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hanson, A.A.; Menger-Anderson, J.; Silverstein, C.; Potter, B.D.; MacRae, I.; Hodgson, E.W.; Koch, R.L. Evidence for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in the Upper Midwestern United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2235–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vojoudi, S.; Saber, M.; Hejazi, M.J.; Talaei-Hassanloui, R. Toxicity of chlorpyrifos, spinosad and abamectin on cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera and their sublethal effects on fecundity and longevity. Bull. Insectol. 2011, 64, 189–193. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, D.J.; Xu, G.C.; Gu, Z.Y.; Xiao, Z.; Dewer, Y.; Zhang, Y.N. Application of transcriptomic analysis to unveil the toxicity mechanisms of fall armyworm response after exposure to sublethal chlorantraniliprole. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2022, 230, 113145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, J.; An, J.; Chang, H.; Li, Y.; Dang, Z.; Wu, C.; Gao, Z. The lethal and sublethal effects of lambda-cyhalothrin and emamectin benzoate on the soybean pest Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius). Toxics 2023, 11, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sial, M.U.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.N.; Mao, L.; Jiang, H.Y. Evaluation of insecticides induced hormesis on the demographic parameters of Myzus persicae and expression changes of metabolic resistance detoxification genes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Z.J.; Li, L.X.; Li, X.H.; Li, W.B.; Gao, Y.; Li, J.B.; Shi, S.S. Cross-generational effects of different concentrations of thiamethoxam on Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae) populations. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2023, 66, 277–291, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tian, X.Y.; Gao, Y.; Ali, M.Y.; Li, X.H.; Hu, Y.L.; Li, W.B.; Wang, Z.J.; Shi, S.S.; Zhang, J.P. Impact of temperature on age–stage, two-sex life table analysis of a Chinese population of bean bug, Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Agriculture 2022, 12, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MSChart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. 2023. Available online: http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/ (accessed on 28 January 2023).
  37. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chi, H.; Su, H.Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gu, Z.Y.; Zhang, T.; Long, S.C.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Chen, Q.; Chen, J.; Feng, Z.Y.; Cao, Y. Responses of Thrips hawaiiensis and Thrips flavus populations to elevated CO2 concentrations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2023, 116, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y.J.; Wang, D.; Yang, J.; Ding, N.; Shi, S.S. Effect of different plants on the growth and reproduction of Thrips flavus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Insects 2021, 12, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tang, Q.Y.; Zhang, C.X. Data Processing System (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, H.; Zhang, C.; Shen, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhang, G.; Liu, W.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Y. Life table parameters of the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on five tomato cultivars in China. Insects 2024, 15, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cai, Y.B.; Dou, T.; Gao, F.T.; Wang, G.H.; Dong, Y.C.; Song, N.; An, S.H.; Yin, X.M.; Liu, X.Y.; Ren, Y.D. Sublethal effects of thiamethoxam on biological traits and detoxification enzyme activities in the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén). J. Econ. Entomol. 2022, 115, 2051–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, P.; Zhou, L.L.; Yang, F.; Li, M.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, Y.; Lei, C.L.; Si, S.Y. Sublethal effects of thiamethoxam on the demographic parameters of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 1750–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhou, C.; Liu, L.L.; Yang, H.; Wang, Z.; Long, G.Y.; Jin, D.C. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on the development, reproduction, and susceptibility of the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 996–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mehdi, T.S.; Seyed, A.S. Sub-lethal effects of tiametoxam on life table parameters of the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) under laboratory conditions. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2014, 47, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dai, W.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Ge, G.L.; Yang, G.Q.; Liu, F. Selectivity and sublethal effects of some frequently-used biopesticides on the predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae). J. Integr. Agr. 2019, 18, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, Q.; Sun, S.; Yang, X.; Yan, H.; Wang, K.; Ba, X.; Wang, H. Sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on the development, body weight and economic characteristics of silkworm. Toxics 2023, 11, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lashkari, M.R.; Sahragard, A.; Ghadamyari, M. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid and pymetrozine on population growth parameters of cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae on rapeseed, Brassica napus L. Insect Sci. 2007, 14, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mostafiz, M.M.; Alam, M.B.; Chi, H.; Hassan, E.; Shim, J.-K.; Lee, K.-Y. Effects of sublethal doses of methyl benzoate on the life history traits and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of Aphis gossypii. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mao, K.K.; Ren, Z.J.; Li, W.H.; Liu, C.Y.; Wan, H. An insecticide resistance diagnostic kit for whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvath). J. Pest. Sci. 2020, 94, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ayyanath, M.M.; Cutler, G.C.; Scott-Dupree, C.D.; Sibley, P.K. Transgenerational shifts in reproduction hormesis in green peach aphid exposed to low concentrations of imidacloprid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pan, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Lu, Y.H.; Xu, X.Y.; Qian, X.H.; Wu, K.M.; Desneux, N. Lethal and sublethal effects of cycloxaprid, a novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid insecticide, on the mirid bug Apolygus lucorum. J. Pest Sci. 2014, 87, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Planes, L.; Catalán, J.; Tena, A.; Porcuna, J.L.; Urbaneja, A. Lethal and sublethal effects of spirotetramat on the mealybug destroyer, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, C.; Sun, T.; He, M.Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.N.; Mao, L.G.; Zhu, L.Z.; Jiang, H.Y.; Zheng, Y.Q.; Liu, X.G. Sublethal toxicity, transgenerational effects, and transcriptome expression of the neonicotinoid pesticide cycloxaprid on demographic fitness of Coccinella septempunctata. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 842, 156887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gong, Y.H.; Cheng, S.Y.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X.W.; Xiu, X.J.; Wang, F.L.; Hou, M.L. Transgenerational hormesis effects of nitenpyram on fitness and insecticide tolerance/resistance of Nilaparvata lugens. J. Pest Sci. 2022, 96, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qu, Y.Y.; Xiao, D.; Li, J.Y.; Chen, Z.; Biondi, A.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X.W.; Song, D.L. Sublethal and hormesis effects of imidacloprid on the soybean aphid Aphis glycines. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Biondi, A.; Campolo, O.; Desneux, N.; Siscaro, G.; Palmeri, V.; Zappalà, L. Life stage-dependent susceptibility of Aphytis melinus DeBach (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) to two pesticides commonly used in citrus orchards. Chemosphere 2015, 128, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, X.Y.; Yang, Z.Q.; Shen, Z.R.; Lu, J.; Xu, W.B. Sublethal effects of selected insecticides on fecundity and wing dimorphism of green peach aphid (Hom., Aphididae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 132, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Azzam, S.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.C.; Shen, J.; Wang, L.P.; Yang, G.Q.; Guo, Y.R. Comparisons of stimulatory effects of a series of concentrations of four insecticides on reproduction in the rice brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2009, 55, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cordeiro, E.M.G.; De Moura, I.L.T.; Fadini, M.A.M.; Guedes, R.N.C. Beyond selectivity: Are behavioral avoidance and hormesis likely causes of pyrethroid-induced outbreaks of the southern red mite Oligonychus ilicis? Chemosphere 2013, 93, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Casida, J.E. Neonicotinoids and other insect nicotinic receptor competitive modulators: Progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mitchell, E.A.D.; Mulhauser, B.; Mulot, M.; Mutabazi, A.; Glauser, G.; Aebi, A. A worldwide survey of neonicotinoids in honey. Science 2017, 358, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gao, Y.; Xu, M.L.; Xiong, J.F. Raman and SERS spectra of thiamethoxam and the Ag3–thiamethoxam complex: An experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2019, 54, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lezcano, M.Y.A.; Gómez, V.L.; Ayala, L.A.; Arguello, E.; Conles, M.; Meneghelo, G.E.; Bareiro, J.; Peña Alvarenga, P.V.; González Vera, M.J. Efficacy of insecticides applied to soybean seeds for controlling lepidoptera caterpillars. J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 14, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, S.T.; Davis, J.A. The impact of thiamethoxam on the feeding and behavior of 2 soybean herbivore feeding guilds. J. Econ. Entomol. 2023, 116, 1621–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Eitchie, E.E.; Maisonneuve, F.; Scroggins, R.P.; Princz, J.I. Lethal and sublethal toxicity of thiamethoxam and clothianidin commercial formulations to soil invertebrates in a natural soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 2111–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hilton, M.J.; Jarvis, T.D.; Ricketts, D.C. The degradation rate of thiamethoxam in European field studies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 72, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Age–stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Riptortus pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Figure 1. Age–stage-specific survival rate (sxj) of Riptortus pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Toxics 12 00460 g001
Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx), age–stage-specific fecundity (fx), and age-specific maternity (lxmx) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments.
Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx), age–stage-specific fecundity (fx), and age-specific maternity (lxmx) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments.
Toxics 12 00460 g002
Figure 3. Life expectancy (exj) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Figure 3. Life expectancy (exj) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Toxics 12 00460 g003
Figure 4. Reproductive value (vxj) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Figure 4. Reproductive value (vxj) of R. pedestris at different thiamethoxam concentration treatments. Note: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5 represent first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs, respectively.
Toxics 12 00460 g004
Table 1. The developmental durations, longevity, APOP, and TPOP of the F1 generation of R. pedestris at LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 concentrations of thiamethoxam.
Table 1. The developmental durations, longevity, APOP, and TPOP of the F1 generation of R. pedestris at LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 concentrations of thiamethoxam.
TreatmentsDevelopment Duration of Developmental Stages of F1 Generation (Days)APOP (Days)TPOP (Days)
EggFirst-Instar NymphSecond-Instar NymphThird-Instar NymphFourth-Instar NymphFifth-Instar NymphNymph PeriodTotal Pre-Adult StageFemale AdultMale Adult
Control6.56 ± 0.03 e2.52 ± 0.06 b4.49 ± 0.12 d4.86 ± 0.14 b4.90 ± 0.11 e6.97 ± 0.13 d23.74 ± 0.11 d29.09 ± 0.33 d15.09 ± 2.13 a16.09 ± 2.28 a3.80 ± 0.22 cd31.59 ± 0.94 c
LC106.79 ± 0.03 d2.52 ± 0.05 b4.71 ± 0.12 d5.41 ± 0.11 b5.93 ± 0.12 d7.93 ± 0.11 c26.50 ± 0.10 c32.76 ± 0.30 c14.02 ± 2.04 a15.04 ± 2.12 ab6.00 ± 0.30 a38.68 ± 1.00 b
LC207.00 ± 0.03 c2.70 ± 0.05 b4.84 ± 0.17 cd4.94 ± 0.13 b6.16 ± 0.24 cd8.17 ± 0.20 c26.81 ± 0.16 c33.12 ± 0.59 c11.01 ± 1.82 a13.01 ± 2.00 abc2.67 ± 0.20 d33.33 ± 1.19 c
LC307.19 ± 0.04 b3.12 ± 0.09 a5.57 ± 0.13 ab6.14 ± 0.12 a7.09 ± 0.20 bc9.35 ± 0.12 b31.27 ± 0.13 b38.26 ± 0.48 b13.04 ± 1.98 ab10.03 ± 1.78 bc4.00 ± 0.34 bcd42.33 ± 0.77 ab
LC407.51 ± 0.04 a2.53 ± 0.06 b5.46 ± 0.13 bc6.20 ± 0.09 a7.21 ± 0.16 b9.58 ± 0.11 b30.98 ± 0.11 b38.58 ± 0.25 b10.05 ± 1.76 ab9.06 ± 1.72 c5.40 ± 0.40 ab43.40 ± 0.29 a
LC507.57 ± 0.05 a2.69 ± 0.09 b6.24 ± 0.21 a6.68 ± 0.22 a8.52 ± 0.30 a10.93 ± 0.22 a35.06 ± 0.21 a41.98 ± 0.66 a7.12 ± 1.48 b8.12 ± 1.71 c5.00 ± 0.40 abc44.00 ± 0.53 a
Note: Data are mean ± SE in this table. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the same column (Tukey’s multiple comparisons; p < 0.05). APOP: adult preoviposition period. TPOP: total preoviposition period.
Table 2. The population parameters of F1 generation of R. pedestris at LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 concentrations of thiamethoxam.
Table 2. The population parameters of F1 generation of R. pedestris at LC10, LC20, LC30, LC40, and LC50 concentrations of thiamethoxam.
TreatmentsIntrinsic Rate of Increase (r) (per Day)Finite Rate of Increase (λ) (per Day)Net Reproductive Rate (R0) (per Offspring Individual)Mean Generation Time (T) (Days)Gross Reproductive Rate (per Female)
Control0.0236 ± 0.0126 a1.0239 ± 0.0128 a2.8250 ± 1.2880 a43.9912 ± 3.4052 bc23.3942 ± 11.1263 a
LC10−0.0014 ± 0.0095 ab0.9986 ± 0.0094 ab0.9333 ± 0.3796 ab49.3404 ± 3.8272 ab5.9912 ± 2.1338 b
LC20−0.0047 ± 0.0151 ab0.9953 ± 0.0147 ab0.8250 ± 0.3839 ab41.2273 ± 3.5944 c6.6078 ± 3.0136 b
LC30−0.0070 ± 0.0122 ab0.9931 ± 0.0119 ab0.7000 ± 0.3264 ab51.1990 ± 3.9177 ab6.4627 ± 3.2590 b
LC40−0.0098 ± 0.0098 ab0.9903 ± 0.0096 ab0.5917 ± 0.2643 b53.6654 ± 2.2354 a6.1293 ± 2.4077 b
LC50−0.0174 ± 0.0135 b0.9828 ± 0.0131 b0.4083 ± 0.2178 b51.5577 ± 2.4927 ab4.3263 ± 2.3479 b
Note: Mean treatment values followed by different letters are significantly different from the control in the same row (p < 0.05). The standard error of the mean (SE) was calculated using a bootstrap technique by resampling 100,000 times. Differences between treatments were assessed using a paired bootstrap test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Li, L.; Chen, L.; Gao, Y.; Yuan, M.; Wang, Y.; Shi, S. The Effect of Different Thiamethoxam Concentrations on Riptortus pedestris Development and Fecundity. Toxics 2024, 12, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070460

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wang S, Li L, Chen L, Gao Y, Yuan M, Wang Y, Shi S. The Effect of Different Thiamethoxam Concentrations on Riptortus pedestris Development and Fecundity. Toxics. 2024; 12(7):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zijie, Song Wang, Lixia Li, Lei Chen, Yu Gao, Ming Yuan, Yueying Wang, and Shusen Shi. 2024. "The Effect of Different Thiamethoxam Concentrations on Riptortus pedestris Development and Fecundity" Toxics 12, no. 7: 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12070460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop