Next Article in Journal
Characteristic Analysis and Health Risk Assessment of PM2.5 and VOCs in Tianjin Based on High-Resolution Online Data
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling the Mysteries of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: New Horizons in Pathogenesis and Prevention
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Response of Daphnia magna Motor Behavior to Mercury Chloride Toxicity Based on Target Tracking

1
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
2
Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
3
Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology for Environmental, Hefei 230031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2024, 12(9), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090621 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 July 2024 / Revised: 19 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Exposome Analysis and Risk Assessment)

Abstract

:
A rapid and timely response to the impacts of mercury chloride, which is indispensable to the chemical industry, on aquatic organisms is of great significance. Here, we investigated whether the YOLOX (improvements to the YOLO series, forming a new high-performance detector) observation system can be used for the rapid detection of the response of Daphnia magna targets to mercury chloride stress. Thus, we used this system for the real-time tracking and observation of the multidimensional motional behavior of D. magna. The results obtained showed that the average velocity ( v ¯ ), average acceleration ( a ¯ ), and cumulative travel ( L ) values of D. magna exposed to mercury chloride stress changed significantly under different exposure times and concentrations. Further, we observed that v ¯ , a ¯ and L values of D. magna could be used as indexes of toxicity response. Analysis also showed evident D. magna inhibition at exposure concentrations of 0.08 and 0.02 mg/L after exposure for 10 and 25 min, respectively. However, under 0.06 and 0.04 mg/L toxic stress, v ¯ and L showed faster toxic response than a ¯ , and overall, v ¯ was identified as the most sensitive index for the rapid detection of D. magna response to toxicity stress. Therefore, we provide a strategy for tracking the motile behavior of D. magna in response to toxic stress and lay the foundations for the comprehensive screening of toxicity in water based on motile behavior.

1. Introduction

Ensuring the ecological and environmental safety of water is of great importance. However, owing to rapid advances in industrial and agricultural development, trace metals have been released into the air, water, and soil via various means [1,2]. These pollutants are characterized by poor degradability, low mobility, and easy accumulation, as they readily accumulate in the environment, posing various ecological risks [3]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that trace metals can be absorbed by plants, accumulate in animals, and enter the human body through the food chain [4]; this causes carcinogenic and teratogenic diseases and damages the nervous, digestive, reproductive, and immune systems [5]. Specifically, mercury, a heavy metal with high toxicity, is a main pollutant that can potentially compromise the health of aquatic ecosystems if its threshold concentration is exceeded [6], and it exerts several effects on aquatic biota, ranging from developmental and reproductive toxicity to neurotoxicity [7]. It has also been shown that mercury ingested by human is oxidized in the gastrointestinal tract to mercury salts (e.g., such as mercury chloride), which show increased circulatory absorption in the body and can further exert toxic effects on the central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, and kidneys [8]. Mercury chloride, one of the extremely toxic mercury salts, is an important disinfectant and raw chemical material [9,10], and its production and utilization inevitably result in leakage into the water environment. It has also been shown that even at low concentrations, mercury can adversely affect the growth, development, and reproduction of marine organisms [11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a fast and effective strategy for evaluating the biological toxicity of mercury chloride.
Daphnia magna, a primary consumer in the food chain, is often used as a model organism in toxicological research owing to its large body size, reproductive capacity, and ability to reproduce asexually via parthenogenesis [12,13]. Its sensitivity to various environmental stressors in aquatic ecosystems [14,15,16,17] also makes it ideal for studying aquatic biotoxicity. Thus, it has been used in several studies on metal toxicity in aquatic environments [18,19].However, traditional acute toxicity endpoint assessments, which are typically based on mortality or immobilization experiments, are often less sensitive and are also time-consuming [20]. Thus, they are unsuitable for assessing the sublethal impacts of low-concentration contaminants in water bodies. Therefore, more sensitive biomarkers are required for the comprehensive analysis of the toxic effects of pollutants, especially those of low-concentration pollutants. Studying the effects of the short-term exposure of aquatic organisms to these pollutants is also of great significance.
A previous study by Melvin and Wilson revealed that to assess the toxicological effects of environmental contaminants, behavioral studies are fast, sensitive, and powerful tools for toxicological studies [21]. Additionally, the behavioral responses of the embryos of zebrafish, owing to exposure to chemical stress, indicate that biobehavioral stress often precedes death and that the concentration of a behavioral stressor for the same exposure time is significantly lower than the lethal concentration [22]. Further, given that the biological movement behavior shows rapid response to toxic stress, it has potential as an early warning signal for water pollution; hence, it can be used as a tool to evaluate the toxicological effects of environmental pollutants. In recent years, sensitive biomarkers, such as swimming behavior, have attracted considerable attention from scientists [23,24,25]. To clearly and intuitively evaluate the degree of the influence of toxic stress on D. magna, biomarkers such as swimming behavior are generally used for quantitative analysis. Studies have also shown that pesticides and heavy metals such as copper can inhibit the swimming speed of D. magna [25,26], which is generally expressed as the average velocity index. The use of acceleration indicators related to swimming speed to study the effects of toxic substances on motility behavior has also been reported [23]. However, swimming behavior is performed with the use of some biomarkers related to this parameter, and differences in toxicity response between these different indicators remain unresolved. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the toxicity response of the multidimensional motional behavior of D. magna.
Presently, environmental risk assessment methods for water quality are primarily based on the evaluation of toxicity levels based on acute toxicity tests using aquatic organisms. Even though the response of the motility of D. magna to stress is critical in assessing the environmental risks of new pollutants and neuroactive drugs [24,27], it has not been used in routine biotoxicity tests with reference to stressors, and studies on rapid behavioral responses to short-term exposure to toxic stress are limited. Mercury chloride is chemically stable after dissolution in water and is often used as a reference toxicant in acute toxicity testing for luminescent bacteria (ISO-11348-3; GB/T15441-1995) [28,29]. Generally, the endpoint for determining acute toxicity in such tests is typically based on the lethal effects of this chemical on organisms. The commonly used parameter is LC50, which is the concentration at which a substance causes death in 50% of the test organisms within 24 or 48 h [30]. However, xenobiotic (mercury) has been shown to induce oxidative stress in cells, leading to disease, aging, and cell death [31]. Furthermore, mercury can have a negative impact on the behavior and health status of tropical freshwater fish [32]. These results indicate that heavy metals have adverse effects on the mobilization of D. magna by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [31]. The YOLOX is an improved version based on YOLO (You Only Look Once) for real-time object detection. Therefore, in this study, we constructed a D. magna target tracking observation system based on YOLOX and used it for the rapid observation of the response of D. magna motion behavior of the toxic stressor mercury chloride. Further, we observed multidimensional motion parameters, namely cumulative travel ( L ), average velocity ( v ¯ ), maximum velocity ( v m a x ), average acceleration ( a ¯ ), and maximum acceleration ( a m a x ), under different exposure times within a certain concentration range, and thereafter, we analyzed behavioral response patterns before the death of the organisms. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the potential of behavioral parameters as early warning indicators of environmental risks. We also aimed to accumulate technical knowledge regarding the rapid detection of integrated toxicity in water bodies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Study Species

Female D. magna (aged ≤24 h) were purchased from the Guangdong Laboratory Animal Monitoring Institute (Guangzhou, China) and continuously cultured in a medium prepared according to the standard of the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM, 1986) for >2 months. D. magna culturing was performed in a thermostatic light box with the temperature maintained at 22 ± 1 °C and with the light–dark cycle set at 16 h light/8 h dark. Further, the test organisms were regularly fed with algae, Chlorella sp., at a density of approximately 105 cells/mL. Then, to carry out the stress interference experiments, adult D. magna were separated from their younger counterparts using a nylon sieve (diameter 1 × 1 mm) and placed in filtered tap water (pH, 7.0–8.5; dissolved oxygen, >4 mg/L; hardness, 250 ± 22 mg/L) that had been aerated for >48 h for breeding. After a breeding cycle of not more than 24 h, the nylon sieve was again used for the second screening to remove the adult D. magna and obtain juvenile D. magna (<24 h), which were then used for the behavioral assays. The reference toxicant was mercury chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and its concentration range was selected according to the standard of acute toxicity equivalent to luminescent bacteria (ISO-11348-3; GB/T15441-1995).

2.2. Experimental Design

A schematic representation of the observation system used in this study is shown in Figure 1. In brief, the observation system consisted of a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, a continuous zoom lens, a U-shaped plexiglass reaction plate, an LED bottom light source, and an additional objective lens module. The behavioral movement of D. magna was recorded at 30 fps using the CCD camera, and the videos obtained were stored on a computer for subsequent analysis.
When using video target recognition and tracking algorithms, the movement and changes in the pose of plankton can cause target tracking failures, resulting in missing or unwanted frames [33], and an extremely short calculation period may lead to inconsistent tracking of frame numbers, resulting in inaccurate cumulative travel. Therefore, it is more reliable to use a period of 5 min to determine the indicators of the motion behavior of D. magna. In this study, different concentrations of mercury chloride (0 (control), 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 mg/L) were employed. Before the toxicity stress experiment, 60 juveniles from the same batch were screened and transferred onto porous (25 mm diameter) plexiglass reaction plates for behavior observation. The juveniles were first allowed for environmental adaptation for 5 min before the observation. Thereafter, similar experiments were performed using the different concentrations of mercury chloride for 30 min. Twelve parallel experiments were performed for each concentration.

2.3. Data Processing

Presently, You Only Look Once (YOLO) is the most widely used object detection algorithm series. Its main feature is its fast detection speed, and over the years, its detection accuracy, known as mAP, has also been improved to obtain high-performance YOLOX [34]. Further, another multi-target tracking algorithm series, ByteTrack, combines target detection and target tracking by associating each detection box rather than by simply reaching a conclusion solely based on a high-score detection box. This approach circumvents issues related to target occlusion (e.g., missed detection and fragmented trajectory) and greatly improves the accuracy and efficiency of the algorithm series [35]. Additionally, ByteTrack has a lightweight design that contributes to its excellent performance. Therefore, in this study, we combined YOLOX and ByteTrack as the final scheme for the D. magna target. Specifically, our video processing primarily relied on the YOLOX object detection algorithm and the ByteTrack object tracking algorithm to continuously track targets of D. magna motion video data and output the coordinate information regarding each target frame.
Treating the moving D. magna as a moving point target, the recorded video could be processed using the target tracking algorithm in the observation system to obtain the coordinate data (xi, yi) of the target in each frame. Further, to characterize the motion behavior of D. magna, the index parameters were obtained based on the continuously tracked target coordinates. i represents the frame number of the recorded video, and (xi, yi) represents the plane coordinates of the target recognized in the i-th frame. L represents the cumulative travel of the target obtained by summing the distances covered by D. magna in the front and back frames of a video. v ¯ represents the average velocity of D. magna calculated as the ratio of the cumulative travel to the duration of the video segment (5 min), and v m a x is a measure of the speed difference between the front and back frames and represents the maximum instantaneous speed in the cycle. Further, a ¯ and a m a x represent the average value of the cumulative change in the speed of the target in the preceding and following frames and the maximum change in speed, respectively.
For the purpose of this study, the five motor behavior indexes of D. magna were calculated by Python. All data were processed by IBM SPSS Statics 19.0 using a statistical criterion of p < 0.05, and the average values were presented. Normal distribution and homogeneity of data were evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Levene’s test, respectively. In this study, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, was performed to compare the effects of the exposure experiment on the motor behavior of D. magna with the controls.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Observation Results under Controlled Conditions

Observation experiments were conducted without toxic stress to determine the effects of the observation system on the motility response of D. magna. The observation period included six 5 min segments, making a total of 30 min. During this period, the mobility behavior of D. magna was monitored and analyzed under different concentrations of mercury chloride. The five indicators used to characterize the motion behavior of D. magna within the 30 min are presented in Figure 2. We noted that the differences between five behavioral motility indicators ( L , v ¯ , v m a x , a ¯ , and a m a x ) of D. magna during the observation period were not significant, and the indicators showed no significant downward or upward trends. This is in good agreement with the results of previous studies [36]. So, it was considered suitable for studying the motility behavior of D. magna following exposure to toxic stress.

3.2. Observation Results under Toxic Stress Conditions

According to the experimental design, the test organisms were exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride, and then the target was continuously tracked for 30 min. Based on the statistical period of 5 min, the changes in the multidimensional motile indexes of D. magna were analyzed during exposure. The results obtained are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Figure 3a shows the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations. From this figure, it is evident that at the four different mercury chloride concentrations, the v ¯ values of D. magna varied significantly with increasing stress exposure duration; the highest concentration was 0.08 mg/L, which showed an inhibition response after 10 min of exposure. At a mercury chloride concentration of 0.06 mg/L, an obvious inhibition response was observed after 20 min exposure. However, under 0.04 mg/L and 0.02 mg/L of mercury chloride stress, no significant changes in v ¯ were observed until after 25 min of exposure.
Figure 3b shows the variation in the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration: it is evident that the v ¯ of D. magna only changed slightly with increasing the mercury chloride concentration. Regardless, the v ¯ showed potential as an effective index for the analysis of the rapid response of D. magna to toxic stress. After 5 min of exposure, there was no significant difference between the v ¯ values of D. magna and the blank group under different stress concentrations. However, when the stress concentration was 0.02 mg/L, we observed a statistically significant difference in response after 10 min of exposure, while other concentrations showed no statistical difference from the blank group. When the stress concentration was 0.02 mg/L and 0.08 mg/L, we observed a statistically significant difference after 15 min of exposure. Until 20 min after exposure, significant differences were observed in all stress concentrations compared with the blank group.
Studies have shown that the activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in zebrafish brain is changed by heavy metal exposure, such as exposure to mercury chloride, which significantly reduces the activity of AChE and the antioxidant capacity of cells [37]. AChE is the key enzyme used to hydrolyze the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the cholinergic synapses of vertebrates and invertebrates, and the inhibition of AChE can lead to decreased swimming ability, which is one of the main factors that changes the swimming behavior of D. magna [38]. Therefore, the D. magna exposed to mercury chloride also inhibited AChE, which caused the average velocity v ¯ of model organisms to decrease.
As either the toxicant concentration or exposure time increased, a series of regulatory behavioral stress responses were activated and performed by the organisms. The behavioral strength of D. magna exposed to organophosphorus insecticides (OPs) demonstrated the presence of the stepwise stress model (SSM) [38]. According to our exposure experiment data, under the same exposure time, the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna decreased first, then increased, and then decreased with the increase in mercury chloride concentration. We found that the behavioral change trends of D. magna were consistent with SSM, which proved the SSM for mercury chloride in D. magna.
Comparative analysis based on the results presented in Figure 3a,b revealed that the changes in the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna were jointly affected by two factors, exposure time and stress concentration, and when the exposure time reached 30 min, the v ¯ values obtained were significantly different relative to those obtained in the blank experiment regardless of the stress concentration. Therefore, the main factor influencing the toxic response of D. magna under different toxic stress conditions in terms of v ¯ was the exposure time.
Figure 4a shows the significance analysis of the average acceleration a ¯ values of D. magna under different mercury chloride concentrations with time. From this figure, it is evident that the a ¯ values of D. magna changed significantly as the exposure time increased, and under the highest stress concentration investigated (0.08 mg/L), a significant inhibitory response appeared after 10 min of exposure. After exposure to 0.06 mg/L and 0.02 mg/L stress concentrations for 25 min, the average acceleration a ¯ showed a significant difference. While exposed to a mercury chloride concentration of 0.04 mg/L, a significant inhibitory response was observed after 30 min. Additionally, when the exposure time reached 30 min, the a ¯ values obtained under the different stress concentrations were significantly different from those obtained in the blank treatment.
Figure 4b shows the variation in the average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with changes in concentration under the same exposure time. After 5 min of exposure, the a ¯ was not statistically different from the blank treatment at any of the four stress concentrations. However, when the exposure time reached 10 and 15 min, there was a significant difference between average acceleration a ¯ and blank treatment at the 0.02 mg/L concentration of stress. Furthermore, when the exposure time reached more than 25 min, the a ¯ of D. magna under all the exposure concentrations showed a significant inhibitory effect relative to the value obtained in the blank treatment. Comparative analysis of the data presented in Figure 4a,b further revealed that the main factor influencing the average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna under the different stress concentrations investigated was the exposure time. In addition, under stress conditions, the toxic response of average acceleration a ¯ was basically the same as that of average velocity v ¯ , and the change trend of the two motion indicators was similar.
As shown in Figure 5a, the cumulative travel L of D. magna under the different stress concentrations changed significantly as the exposure time increased. From this figure, it is evident that at the four different mercury chloride concentrations, the L of D. magna varied significantly with increasing stress exposure duration; the highest concentration was 0.08 mg/L, which showed an inhibition response after 10 min of exposure. At a mercury chloride concentration of 0.06 mg/L, an obvious inhibition response was observed after 20 min of exposure. However, under 0.04 mg/L and 0.02 mg/L mercury chloride stress, no significant changes in L were observed until after 25 min of exposure. Further, from Figure 5b, which shows the significance analysis of the changes in the L of D. magna with concentration under the same exposure time, it is evident that the L of D. magna changed slightly with increasing stress concentration. Within the first 10 min of exposure, we did not observe any significant differences in the L of D. magna under the different concentrations relative to the value obtained for the blank treatment. However, after 15 min of exposure, significant differences in L were observed even under the lowest stress concentration (0.02 mg/L). Similarly, those were basically identical for the average velocity v ¯ , average acceleration a ¯ , and cumulative travel L toxicity response, and the change trend was also similar to that under stress conditions.
Figure 6a,b show the analysis of the maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna movement under different mercury chloride stress concentrations. From this figure, it is evident that at the four different mercury chloride concentrations, the maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna showed no significant differences during the stress period. Figure 7a,b showed that except for the highest stress concentration (0.08 mg/L), under which the maximum acceleration a m a x value of D. magna changed significantly after 30 min of exposure, the other stress conditions showed no significant differences. Although the a m a x is not a sensitive endpoint (compare to others), an increase in the concentration or exposure time may provoke a significant response. This situation may be due to the damage of the cell membranes of muscle cells after exposure to heavy metals [31], which leads to the destruction of muscle tissue and affects muscle strength and efficiency. Overall, this research suggests that the v m a x and a m a x biomarkers may not be reliable for toxic analysis of mercury chloride in the context of our study.
Relevant research has shown that mercury can affect AChE activity in vivo, lead to biological neurotoxicity [37], and impair biological motor functions [39]. Exposure to mercury chloride may cause anxiety-related responses, such as short- and long-term memory impairment, as well as motor deficits. Mercury can also accumulate in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of organisms and promote functional impairment [40]. Additionally, studies have shown that changes in motility behavior of D. magna may also be caused by metabolic disorders [20], ion channel dysfunction [41], or muscle injury caused [42] by external stress. Mercury chloride can be toxic to macromolecules of organisms, inhibit enzyme activity, and damage the nervous system through a variety of mechanisms. Therefore, the experimental results showed that the motility behavior of Daphnia magna exposed to mercury chloride was inhibited. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of acetylcholinesterase is one of the main factors that changes the swimming behavior of D. magna after exposure to dichlorvos [38], and there is a relatively close relationship between the inhibition of AChE activity and altered behavioral parameters (feeding rate and motor behavior) [43]. Therefore, the motility behavior of D. magna is affected by exposure to mercury chloride, which is largely due to the inhibition of AChE.
Based on our experimental results, the motor behavior of D. magna under toxic stress changed, suggesting that its motor neurons were impaired. Therefore, based on the above results of our exposure experiments, v ¯ , a ¯ , and L can be used as sensitive indicators of toxicity response. However, the differences in response speed between these three motility indexes of D. magna can be further used to determine the optimal sensitivity index that allows for the rapid detection of responses to toxic species.

3.3. Comparison of Different Indicators with Respect to Toxicity Response

The results of the mercury chloride exposure tests showed that the v ¯ , a ¯ , and L of D. magna changed significantly under the combined influence of exposure time and exposure concentration. This observation indicated that the three motion indicators have potential for use as effective indicators for analyzing the rapid response of D. magna to toxic stress. However, differences in response characteristics between these three indicators still require further analysis.
Figure 8 shows the correlation analysis between the average velocity v ¯ , cumulative travel L , and average acceleration a ¯ , respectively, and the results show that there is a good linear relationship between the three aspects. Based on the linear relationship between the parameters, the conversion between the parameters can be realized. This phenomenon corresponds to the mathematical formula between velocity, acceleration, and accumulated travel.
Figure 9a,e,i and Figure 9d,h,l show the same level of stress response for the three sensitivity indexes at exposure concentrations of 0.08 and 0.02 mg/L. However, it can be seen in Figure 9b,f,j that when the exposure concentration was 0.06 mg/L, the average velocity v ¯ and cumulative travel L showed extremely significant differences after 20 min of exposure, while the average acceleration a ¯ remained unchanged. Additionally, Figure 9c,g,k shows that when the exposure concentration was 0.04 mg/L, v ¯ and L showed significant differences after 25 min of exposure, while a ¯ still showed no significant change.
Even though the three indicators of D. magna response to stress showed significant changes within 30 min of exposure, further comparison revealed that the average velocity v ¯ and cumulative travel L could respond more quickly under the same stress conditions. Thus, we identified them as more sensitive motion indicators. In order to efficiently and comprehensively assess toxicity responses for accurate water quality evaluation based on the movement behavior of D. magna, the use of the more sensitive and effective indicators v ¯ and L of D. magna response to toxic stress is highly recommended. However, for the L indicator, it is susceptible to the impact of the target tracking process, especially during short-term exposure. Further, occasional loss of target tracking may lead to the final statistical cumulative distance results being inaccurate [33]. Conversely, the use of v ¯ , which is based on the average of multiple measurements over a period, can significantly improve the bias caused by the accumulation of local travel. At the same time, average speed is one of the most reliable and widely applied parameters for biomarkers of D. magna sensitivity toxicity [20]. Taken together, the v ¯ of D. magna can serve as the most ideal indicator of response to the stress of toxicity.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we developed a real-time tracking method for D. magna based on the YOLOX object recognition algorithm, enabling the continuous monitoring of multiple dimensions of D. magna locomotion behavior owing to toxic stress. We effectively validated the rapid response of D. magna locomotion behavior to mercury chloride toxicity in short-term exposure experiments. Relative to the limitations of traditional acute toxicity tests (e.g., they require 24 or 48 h and are cumbersome), in this study, we demonstrated the monitoring of D. magna locomotion behavior as a strategy for rapidly realizing toxicity response tests. Statistical analysis based on two factors, exposure time and exposure concentration, indicated that short-term exposure to toxic stress could lead to significant changes in the v ¯ , a ¯ , and L values of D. magna. Further, by comparing the toxic responses of D. magna based on these three indicators, we identified v ¯ as an optimal indicator for the rapid detection of the response of D. magna to toxic stress. The rapid response of D. magna locomotion behavior to mercury chloride toxicity observed in this study via target tracking could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the toxic effects of aquatic pollutants. Additionally, this strategy lays the foundations for the rapid detection and screening of comprehensive toxicity in water based on motor behavior. Therefore, the real-time tracking and monitoring of model organisms not only serves as a high-throughput screening tool but may also be applied to online water environment risk early warning, significantly improving the efficiency and accuracy of environmental monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Q.; methodology, F.Q.; validation, F.Q.; formal analysis, F.Q.; investigation, X.J.; data curation, S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Q.; writing—review and editing, N.Z. and G.Y.; visualization, L.A.; supervision, N.Z.; project administration, G.Y.; funding acquisition, N.Z. and G.Y.; software, T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program, grant numbers 2022YFC3103901 and 2021YFC3200102; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 62375270; the Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Special Project, grant number 202203a07020002; and the Hefei Comprehensive Science Center Environmental Research Institute research team construction project, grant number HYKYTD2024004.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Joseph Redmon from University of Washington for developing the algorithm that formed the basis of this study, namely the YOLO algorithm.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Guan, Q.; Wang, L.; Pan, B.; Guan, W.; Sun, X.; Cai, A. Distribution features and controls of heavy metals in surface sediments from the riverbed of the Ningxia-Inner Mongolian reaches, Yellow River, China. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Järup, L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, J.; Yang, B.; Wu, H. Risk assessment of trace metal(loid) pollution in surface water of industrial areas along the Huangpu River and Yangtze River Estuary in Shanghai, China. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2023, 57, 102746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gall, J.E.; Boyd, R.S.; Rajakaruna, N. Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, L.; Gao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lv, X.; Lei, K. Salinity-dependent aquatic life criteria of inorganic mercury in coastal water and its ecological risk assessment. Environ. Res. 2023, 217, 114957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scheuhammer, A.M.; Meyer, M.W.; Sandheinrich, M.B.; Murray, M.W. Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. AMBIO 2007, 36, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sandborgh-englund, G.; Einarsson, C.; Sandström, M.; Ekstrand, J. Gastrointestinal Absorption of Metallic Mercury. Arch. Environ. Health Int. J. 2004, 59, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Clarkson, T.W.; Magos, L.; Myers, G.J. The Toxicology of Mercury—Current Exposures and Clinical Manifestations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, J.; Shi, J.-Z.; Yu, L.-M.; Goyer, R.A.; Waalkes, M.P. Mercury in Traditional Medicines: Is Cinnabar Toxicologically Similar to Common Mercurials? Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, M.; Tong, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, W.; He, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Lin, Y. Ecological risk assessment to marine organisms induced by heavy metals in China’s coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 126, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ebert, D. Daphnia as a versatile model system in ecology and evolution. EvoDevo 2022, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Koivisto, S. Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? Environ. Pollut. 1995, 90, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Biesinger, K.E.; Christensen, G.M. Effects of Various Metals on Survival, Growth, Reproduction, and Metabolism of Daphnia magna. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1972, 29, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, Q.; Wang, X.; Sun, P.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Acute and chronic toxicity of tetrabromobisphenol A to three aquatic species under different pH conditions. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 164, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, Y.; Choi, K.; Jung, J.; Park, S.; Kim, P.-G.; Park, J. Aquatic toxicity of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, cimetidine, diltiazem and six major sulfonamides, and their potential ecological risks in Korea. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Qu, R.; Liu, J.; Wei, Z.; Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Z. Effect of different carbon nanotubes on cadmium toxicity to Daphnia magna: The role of catalyst impurities and adsorption capacity. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 208, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Altshuler, I.; Demiri, B.; Xu, S.; Constantin, A.; Yan, N.D.; Cristescu, M.E. An Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Approach for Studying Multiple Stressors in Freshwater Ecosystems: Daphnia as a Model Organism. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2011, 51, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsui, M.T.K.; Wang, W.-X. Uptake and Elimination Routes of Inorganic Mercury and Methylmercury in Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bownik, A. Daphnia swimming behaviour as a biomarker in toxicity assessment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601–602, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Melvin, S.D.; Wilson, S.P. The utility of behavioral studies for aquatic toxicology testing: A meta-analysis. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 2217–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reif, D.M.; Truong, L.; Mandrell, D.; Marvel, S.; Zhang, G.; Tanguay, R.L. High-throughput characterization of chemical-associated embryonic behavioral changes predicts teratogenic outcomes. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 1459–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hansen, L.R.; Roslev, P. Behavioral responses of juvenile Daphnia magna after exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate-copper complexes. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 179, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Noss, C.; Dabrunz, A.; Rosenfeldt, R.R.; Lorke, A.; Schulz, R. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Swimming Behavior of Daphnia magna Exposed to Nanosized Titanium Dioxide. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Untersteiner, H.; Kahapka, J.; Kaiser, H. Behavioural response of the cladoceran Daphnia magna Straus to sublethal Copper stress—Validation by image analysis. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 65, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Christensen, B.T.; Lauridsen, T.L.; Ravn, H.W.; Bayley, M. A comparison of feeding efficiency and swimming ability of Daphnia magna exposed to cypermethrin. Aquat. Toxicol. 2005, 73, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tkaczyk, A.; Bownik, A.; Dudka, J.; Kowal, K.; Ślaska, B. Daphnia magna model in the toxicity assessment of pharmaceuticals: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 143038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. International Organization for Standardization. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/40518.html (accessed on 20 April 2023).
  29. National Public Service Platform for Standards Information. Available online: https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=CF2E75792CF341FCD45F2613140293D1 (accessed on 20 April 2023).
  30. Tsui, M.T.K.; Wang, W.-X. Acute Toxicity of Mercury to Daphnia magna under Different Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4025–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.; Yim, B.; Bae, C.; Lee, Y.-M. Acute toxicity and antioxidant responses in the water flea Daphnia magna to xenobiotics (cadmium, lead, mercury, bisphenol A, and 4-nonylphenol). Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2017, 9, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Monteiro, D.A.; Rantin, F.T.; Kalinin, A.L. Inorganic mercury exposure: Toxicological effects, oxidative stress biomarkers and bioaccumulation in the tropical freshwater fish matrinxã, Brycon amazonicus (Spix and Agassiz, 1829). Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Z.; Du, M.; Yang, X.-D.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.-S.; Qian, C.; Yu, H.-Q. Deep-Learning-Based Automated Tracking and Counting of Living Plankton in Natural Aquatic Environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 18048–18057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ge, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.; Sun, J. YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2107.08430. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Sun, P.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, D.; Weng, F.; Yuan, Z.; Luo, P.; Liu, W.; Wang, X. ByteTrack: Multi-object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Box. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision 2022, Tel Aviv, Israel, 23–27 October 2022; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yuan, S.; Liang, C.; Li, W.; Letcher, R.J.; Liu, C. A comprehensive system for detection of behavioral change of D. magna exposed to various chemicals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Richetti, S.K.; Rosemberg, D.B.; Ventura-Lima, J.; Monserrat, J.M.; Bogo, M.R.; Bonan, C.D. Acetylcholinesterase activity and antioxidant capacity of zebrafish brain is altered by heavy metal exposure. NeuroToxicology 2011, 32, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ren, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Qi, P.; Zhang, B.; Zeng, Y.; Fu, R.; Miao, M. AChE inhibition: One dominant factor for swimming behavior changes of Daphnia magna under DDVP exposure. Chemosphere 2015, 120, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pereira, P.; Puga, S.; Cardoso, V.; Pinto-Ribeiro, F.; Raimundo, J.; Barata, M.; Pousão-Ferreira, P.; Pacheco, M.; Almeida, A. Inorganic mercury accumulation in brain following waterborne exposure elicits a deficit on the number of brain cells and impairs swimming behavior in fish (white seabream—Diplodus sargus). Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 170, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Teixeira, F.B.; Fernandes, R.M.; Farias-Junior, P.M.A.; Costa, N.M.M.; Fernandes, L.M.P.; Santana, L.N.S.; Silva-Junior, A.F.; Silva, M.C.F.; Maia, C.S.F.; Lima, R.R. Evaluation of the Effects of Chronic Intoxication with Inorganic Mercury on Memory and Motor Control in Rats. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 9171–9185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferrão-Filho, A.S.; Soares, M.C.S.; Lima, R.S.; Magalhães, V.F. Effects of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (cyanobacteria) on the swimming behavior of Daphnia (cladocera). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pawlik-Skowrońska, B.; Bownik, A. Cyanobacterial anabaenopeptin-B, microcystins and their mixture cause toxic effects on the behavior of the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna (Cladocera). Toxicon 2021, 198, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xuereb, B.; Lefèvre, E.; Garric, J.; Geffard, O. Acetylcholinesterase activity in Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea Amphipoda): Linking AChE inhibition and behavioural alteration. Aquat. Toxicol. 2009, 94, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the experimental observation system.
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the experimental observation system.
Toxics 12 00621 g001
Figure 2. Motor behavior indexes ( L , v ¯ , v m a x , a ¯ , and a m a x ) of D. magna showing no significant changes within a 30 min observation period. The results are expressed as mean ± SE.
Figure 2. Motor behavior indexes ( L , v ¯ , v m a x , a ¯ , and a m a x ) of D. magna showing no significant changes within a 30 min observation period. The results are expressed as mean ± SE.
Toxics 12 00621 g002
Figure 3. Average velocity v ¯ of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Average velocity v ¯ of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Toxics 12 00621 g003
Figure 4. Average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are presented as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are presented as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Toxics 12 00621 g004
Figure 5. Cumulative travel L of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) cumulative travel L of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the cumulative travel L of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * indicates significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** indicates highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 5. Cumulative travel L of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) cumulative travel L of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the cumulative travel L of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * indicates significant differences (p < 0.05), and ** indicates highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Toxics 12 00621 g005
Figure 6. Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant differences analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE.
Figure 6. Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant differences analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the Maximum velocity v m a x of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE.
Toxics 12 00621 g006
Figure 7. Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Figure 7. Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna exposed to different concentrations of mercury chloride and significant difference analysis compared to the control during the experimental period. (a) Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna with time under different mercury chloride concentrations; (b) the variation in the Maximum acceleration a m a x of D. magna with mercury chloride concentration. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01).
Toxics 12 00621 g007
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of average velocity v ¯ with cumulative travel L and average acceleration a ¯ at different exposure concentrations. The results are expressed as means. A correlation study was performed.
Figure 8. Correlation analysis of average velocity v ¯ with cumulative travel L and average acceleration a ¯ at different exposure concentrations. The results are expressed as means. A correlation study was performed.
Toxics 12 00621 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of three indicators ( v ¯ , a ¯ , and L ) of stress response and significant differences analysis compared to control. Average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (a) 0.08, (b) 0.06 (c) 0.04 and (d) 0.02 mg/L; average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (e) 0.08, (f) 0.06 (g) 0.04 and (h) 0.02 mg/L; cumulative travel L of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (i) 0.08, (j) 0.06 (k) 0.04 and (l) 0.02 mg/L. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), while ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01). Further, the colored bars represent different exposure concentrations.
Figure 9. Comparison of three indicators ( v ¯ , a ¯ , and L ) of stress response and significant differences analysis compared to control. Average velocity v ¯ of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (a) 0.08, (b) 0.06 (c) 0.04 and (d) 0.02 mg/L; average acceleration a ¯ of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (e) 0.08, (f) 0.06 (g) 0.04 and (h) 0.02 mg/L; cumulative travel L of D. magna with time at the mercury chloride concentration of (i) 0.08, (j) 0.06 (k) 0.04 and (l) 0.02 mg/L. The results are expressed as mean ± SE. * represents significant differences (p < 0.05), while ** represents highly significant differences (p < 0.01). Further, the colored bars represent different exposure concentrations.
Toxics 12 00621 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, F.; Zhao, N.; Yin, G.; Wang, T.; Jv, X.; Han, S.; An, L. Rapid Response of Daphnia magna Motor Behavior to Mercury Chloride Toxicity Based on Target Tracking. Toxics 2024, 12, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090621

AMA Style

Qin F, Zhao N, Yin G, Wang T, Jv X, Han S, An L. Rapid Response of Daphnia magna Motor Behavior to Mercury Chloride Toxicity Based on Target Tracking. Toxics. 2024; 12(9):621. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Feihu, Nanjing Zhao, Gaofang Yin, Tao Wang, Xinyue Jv, Shoulu Han, and Lisha An. 2024. "Rapid Response of Daphnia magna Motor Behavior to Mercury Chloride Toxicity Based on Target Tracking" Toxics 12, no. 9: 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12090621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop