Next Article in Journal
GRGB rPPG: An Efficient Low-Complexity Remote Photoplethysmography-Based Algorithm for Heart Rate Estimation
Next Article in Special Issue
Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on Surfaces by Cold-Plasma-Generated Reactive Species
Previous Article in Journal
Cell–Biomaterial Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Engineering In Situ Weldable Vascular Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Home Spirometry in Children with Cystic Fibrosis

1
Division of Pulmonology and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA
2
Arkansas Children’s Hospital Cystic Fibrosis Care Center, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(2), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020242
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 11 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances of Medical Devices)

Abstract

We report the implementation of a pediatric home spirometry program at our institution. A respiratory therapist provided either a virtual or an in-person initiation visit that included a coached spirometry session. Families were instructed to perform daily uncoached spirometry sessions for 5 days. The program’s quality assurance component was deemed not to be human research by the local IRB. In total, 52 subjects completed an initiation visit (34 with at least 3 additional uncoached spirometry sessions). The clinic spirometry and coached (same-day) sessions and uncoached (same-week) sessions were completed by 12 and 17 subjects, respectively. The median (99% CI) coefficients of variation for FEV1% of the uncoached maneuvers were 3.5% (2.9–5.9%). The median (IQR) FEV1% and FEV1 (mL) absolute differences between coached and uncoached home spirometry were −2% (−4 and +3%) and −25 mL (−93 and +93 mL), respectively. The median (IQR) absolute differences in FEV1% and FEV1 (mL) between coached or uncoached home spirometry and clinic spirometry were −6% (−10 and −2%) and −155 mL (−275 and −88 mL), and −4% (−10 and +5%), and −110 mL (−280 and +9 mL), respectively. Differences in absolute FEV1 (L) and FEV1% were found among different modalities of spirometry performed by people with cystic fibrosis. Understanding the variability of uncoached home spirometry and the differences among coached and uncoached home spirometry, hospital and coached home spirometry, and hospital and uncoached home spirometry for any given individual is crucial to effectively utilize this tool in clinical care.
Keywords: cystic fibrosis; home spirometry; pediatrics; FEV1; telehealth cystic fibrosis; home spirometry; pediatrics; FEV1; telehealth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berlinski, A.; Leisenring, P.; Willis, L.; King, S. Home Spirometry in Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020242

AMA Style

Berlinski A, Leisenring P, Willis L, King S. Home Spirometry in Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(2):242. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berlinski, Ariel, Pamela Leisenring, Lauren Willis, and Sandra King. 2023. "Home Spirometry in Children with Cystic Fibrosis" Bioengineering 10, no. 2: 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020242

APA Style

Berlinski, A., Leisenring, P., Willis, L., & King, S. (2023). Home Spirometry in Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Bioengineering, 10(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop