Next Article in Journal
Optimal Feature Selection-Based Dental Caries Prediction Model Using Machine Learning for Decision Support System
Next Article in Special Issue
Review on Biomedical Advances of Hybrid Nanocomposite Biopolymeric Materials
Previous Article in Journal
GRGB rPPG: An Efficient Low-Complexity Remote Photoplethysmography-Based Algorithm for Heart Rate Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ιnclusion Complexes of Magnesium Phthalocyanine with Cyclodextrins as Potential Photosensitizing Agents

by
Eleni Kavetsou
1,
Charalampos Tsoukalas-Koulas
1,
Annita Katopodi
1,
Alexandros Kalospyros
1,
Eleni Alexandratou
2 and
Anastasia Detsi
1,*
1
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
2
Laboratory of Biomedical Optics and Applied Biophysics, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(2), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020244
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 13 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeted Nanodelivery systems for Oncology Applications)

Abstract

:
In this work, the preparation of inclusion complexes, (ICs) using magnesium phthalocyanine (MgPc) and various cyclodextrins (β-CD, γ-CD, HP-β-CD, Me-β-CD), using the kneading method is presented. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicated that the particles in dispersion possessed mean size values between 564 to 748 nm. The structural characterization of the ICs by infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides evidence of the formation of the ICs. The release study of the MgPc from the different complexes was conducted at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, and indicated that a rapid release (“burst effect”) of ~70% of the phthalocyanine occurred in the first 20 min. The kinetic model that best describes the release profile is the Korsmeyer–Peppas. The photodynamic therapy studies against the squamous carcinoma A431 cell line indicated a potent photosensitizing activity of MgPc (33% cell viability after irradiation for 3 min with 18 mW/cm2), while the ICs also presented significant activity. Among the different ICs, the γ-CD-MgPc IC exhibited the highest photokilling capacity under the same conditions (cell viability 26%). Finally, intracellular localization studies indicated the enhanced cellular uptake of MgPc after incubation of the cells with the γ-CD-MgPc complex for 4 h compared to MgPc in its free form.

1. Introduction

Phthalocyanines (PCs) are large, aromatic, organic molecules that consist of a large internal porphyrazine ring, which connects four isoindole units linked together by nitrogen atoms. PCs display a wide range of applications due to their chemical, electronic, structural, and optical properties [1,2]. There is also the possibility for incorporation of a metal atom (Mg, Zn etc.) in the center of their ring to form molecules known as metallophthalocyanines, which results in improved properties. Phthalocyanines and metallophthalocyanines have been initially used as pigments and coloring substances as well as chemical sensors, semiconductors, etc. [3]. PCs are now being studied as promising photosensitizing agents for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of both cancer and non-cancer related diseases [4,5,6,7].
Nowadays, PDT is being investigated thoroughly as an alternative to conventional treatment of both cancer and non-cancer related diseases. During PDT, a non-toxic dye (the photosensitizer) is administered and then it is exposed to a light source of a specific wavelength depending on the absorption properties of the molecule used [8]. The interaction of light with the photosensitizer leads to the death of the target cells by oxidative stress, which is induced after the stimulation of the photosensitizer and subsequent production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). PCs are considered as 2nd generation photosensitizers along with porphyrins and chlorins [3,4]. Their structure and properties render them excellent candidates for PDT applications, while their synthesis is relatively simple. PCs can also be structurally modified in order to modify their properties, such as their hydrophobicity. As molecules, they tend to be stable and are able to produce significant amounts of ROS. In regard to their photophysical properties, the absorbance maximum is noted to be at approximately 675 nm which is within the therapeutic window and, more importantly, at the red region of the visible spectrum where the penetration of the light in human tissues is reported to be the maximum. However, PCs are not hydrophilic molecules and display extremely low solubility in aqueous media, tending to form aggregations due to π-π* stacking and hydrophobic interactions [3,4].
Recent studies focus on the encapsulation of phthalocyanines in different carriers and the evaluation of their properties regarding their respective future application in order to overcome the aforementioned disadvantages [9,10,11,12]. More specifically, polymeric nanoparticles have been used in order to co-load curcumin along with phthalocyanines as a novel drug delivery system used in PDT [9], while other studies have developed multifunctional hybrid nanoparticles consisting of PLGA and hyaluronic acid in order to encapsulate phthalocyanines and investigated their tumor targeting effect as well as their photodynamic activity [10]. Liposomes have also been studied as promising carriers for phthalocyanines: in the work of Nkanga et al., cyclodextrins and liposomes were combined in order to successfully encapsulate an isoniazid-hydrazone-phthalocyanine conjugate [11]. In this context, a very promising candidate that has attracted attention the last few years and was investigated in this study as well, are cyclodextrins (CDs) and their ability to form inclusion complexes (ICs) [13,14].
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are a family of cyclic oligosaccharides, derived from starch and they consist of repeating α-D-glucopyranose units. The number of α-D-glucopyranose units is six, seven, and eight for α-CD, β-CD, and γ-CD, respectively [15,16,17]. The structure of the CDs resembles a truncated cone with a hydrophilic outer surface and a hydrophobic inner cavity. At the narrow ring of the cone, the primary -OH groups of the 6-CH2OH group of the glucopyranose ring are located, whereas at the ring with the wider diameter, the secondary -OH groups are found. Due to the aforementioned structure, CDs are water soluble and can form water-soluble inclusion complexes with guest molecules which can be entrapped into the hydrophobic cavity. In an aqueous environment, hydrophobic molecules, such as phthalocyanines, or a part of them, can replace the water molecules inside the cavity leading to a new thermodynamic equilibrium [16,18]. Chemically modified cyclodextrins, such as hydroxy-propyl-β-CD (HP-β-CD), methylated β-CD (Me-β-CD) (Figure 1), and the sulfobutyl ether derivative of β-CD (SBE-β-CD) have been also used as host molecules as they present higher aqueous solubility than the natural β-CD [19].
The purpose of the present work was initially to study the inclusion of magnesium phthalocyanine (MgPc) (Figure 1) in natural (β-CD, γ-CD) and chemically modified cyclodextrins (HP-β-CD, Me-β-CD) in order to increase the solubility of MgPc and potentially enhance their photodynamic activity. The ICs were characterized and the release profile and kinetic modeling of MgPc release from the inclusion complexes were determined. The resulting inclusion complexes were then studied in terms of their optical properties and their ability to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). PDT activity of free MgPc and its ICs was evaluated in vitro against an A431 skin cancer cell line, and the intracellular localization of the most potent photosensitizing nanosystem was also studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

β-Cyclodextrin (β-CD), HP-β-Cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), and Me-β-Cyclodextrin (Me-β-CD) of >99% purity were purchased from Honeywell Fluka (Charlotte, NC, USA), ACROS (Waltham, MA, USA) and Glentham (Corsham, UK), while magnesium phthalocyanine (MgPc) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′-7′dichlorodi-hydrofluorescein diacetate acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). Ethanol of analytical reagent grade was purchased from Merck Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) of ACS grade was purchased from Chem-Lab (Zedelgem, Belgium). All the dispersions and solutions were prepared using deionized water. The aforementioned materials were used without further purification. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose, and Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), without CaCl2 and MgCl2, pH 7.4, were purchased from Gibco (Waltham, MA, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), antibiotic–antimitotic, and gentamicin were also purchased from Gibco. Trypsine (EDTA), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The human epidermal carcinoma cell line A431 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Magnesium Phthalocyanine Inclusion Complexes (ICs) with Various Cyclodextrins

Magnesium phthalocyanine was incorporated in various cyclodextrins using the kneading method [19,20]. MgPc and the respective cyclodextrin (β-CD, γ-CD, HP-β-CD, Me-β-CD) were added to the mortar in molar ratio 1:1. To create a homogeneous paste, a solution of water:ethanol in ratio 3:2 was added dropwise. The paste was ground for at least 45 min. The final blue solid powder was dried using a high vacuum pump and stored under refrigeration, for further analysis and characterization. The same procedure (kneading method) was applied under solvent-free conditions for MgPc and HP-β-CD, while the corresponding physical mixture of the components was also prepared for the better assessment of the ICs’ formation (prepared samples were used for comparison purposes of the FT-IR and/or NMR analysis).

2.3. Evaluation of the Stoichiometry of the ICs Using Job’s Plot

To determine the stoichiometry of the inclusion complex, the Job’s plot was indicatively conducted for β-CD/MgPc mixture. Phosphate buffer solutions (pH 7.4) with known concentrations of both compounds (MgPc and β-CD) were prepared. The total sum of the two masses was kept constant while their molar ratio varied from 0 to 1 (Equation (1)). The absorbance of each sample was determined using UV-Vis. With these measurements a (Abs(MgPc) − Abs(MgPc + β − CD)) versus molar ratio graph was constructed. The stoichiometry was evaluated from identifying the maximum or minimum point in the graph.
Molar   ratio   r = MgPc MgPc + β CD

2.4. Characterization of the CD—MgPc ICs

2.4.1. Process Yield

The process yield (PY) is used to determine the suitability of a process chosen for a specific protocol and is calculated by dividing the final mass of the dried inclusion complexes by the total amount of CD and MgPc initially used. For each IC that was produced, the PΥ was calculated from the following equation (Equation (2)).
% PY = 100 × mass   of   the   prepared   inclusion   complex   mg initial   mass   of   β CD   +   initial   mass   of   MgPc   to   be   encapsulated   mg

2.4.2. Inclusion Efficiency of the CD-Phthalocyanines ICs

The inclusion efficiency (IE) describes the percentage of the encapsulated MgPc in the CD—MgPc ICs, relative to the total starting amount of MgPc used ((Equation (3)).
  % IE   = 100 × mass   of   the   encapsulated   MgPc   mg initial   mass   of   MgPc   to   be   encapsulated   mg
The inclusion efficiency of the MgPc in the CD-MgPc ICs was calculated using UV-Vis by determining the quantity of the encapsulated MgPc. All of the UV-Vis measurements were performed on a V-770 UV-Vis Jasco spectrophotometer. For each dried inclusion complex, 10 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added into 10 mg of IC and stirred for at least 24 h at room temperature. The samples were then filtered, diluted appropriately, and their absorbance was measured in the range of 500–800 nm. All of the measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.4.3. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

In order to determine the size, polydispersity index, and the ζ-potential of the CD-MgPc ICs by the DLS method, measurements were performed on the Zetasizer Nano ZS Malvern. The samples were prepared by dispersing 1 mg of the CD-MgPc ICs in 20 mL of double deionized water. The final solutions were then stirred and vortexed directly before the measurement. For the measurements, cuvettes of type U (DTS1070) were used. For each sample, the measurements were performed at 25 ± 1 °C and in triplicate. The results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. All of the measurements were conducted for pH 7.4.

2.4.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR Spectroscopy)

FT-IR measurements were performed in order to study the formation of the ICs as well as the interaction between the MgPc and the cyclodextrins. A JASCO FT/IR-4200 spectrometer (Japan Spectroscopic Company, Tokyo, Japan) was used. All the measurements for MgPc, CDs, the final dried ICs, the physical mixture, and the solvent-free kneading product were conducted in the form of KBr pellets, in the scanning range of 650–4000 cm−1.

2.4.5. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR Spectroscopy)

1H-NMR spectra of CDs, the final dried CD-MgPc ICs, and the physical mixture of HP-β-CD and MgPc were obtained using the Varian 600 MHz spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA), located at the Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation). The samples were dissolved in deuterated DMSO (DMSO-d6). The chemical shifts were expressed in parts per million (ppm) while the coupling constants (J) in hertz (Hz).

2.5. In Vitro Release Studies of the MgPc from the CD-MgPc ICs

The release profile of the MgPc was evaluated under specified conditions. For each IC, 5mg of the dried final product was added to different glass vials, each one corresponding to a specific time of incubation. In each vial, 2 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was added, and the samples were kept in an incubator under 37 °C. At predetermined time intervals, each vial was removed, filtered, and diluted with DMSO, in order to determine the MgPc concentration. All of the measurements were done in duplicate.

Kinetic Modeling of the MgPc Release from the CD-MgPc ICs

The kinetic models that are widely applied to describe the release of bio-active substances from drug delivery systems are the zero-order model, first-order model, Higuchi model, and Korsmeyer-Peppas model [21,22].
From the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation, the diffusion exponent (n) can be calculated. After the calculation of n, the mechanism of the release can be described.
F = M t M = k m t n
which can also be written as:
log M t M = log k m + n l o g t
Based on the aforementioned equations (Equations (4) and (5)), the slope of the log(Mt/M) versus log(t) graphs is equal to the diffusion exponent n [21,22].

2.6. Optical Properties of Inclusion Complexes of MgPc with Natural and Modified CDs

2.6.1. UV-Vis Absorption

The absorption spectra of MgPc in DMSO and CD-MgPc ICs in PBS (1% v/v DMSO) were recorded at the concentration of 2 μΜ using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 35 UV/VIS spectrometer. The samples were freshly prepared just before measurements. All measurements were carried out at room temperature.

2.6.2. ROS Production

CM-H2DCFDA is a chloromethyl derivative of 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA). This substance works as fluorescent tracer and can be detected after being hydrolyzed because it turns into a fluorescent substance when it reacts with free radicals. The hydrolysis of CM-H2DCFDA was carried out using sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
Subsequently, the hydrolyzed substance is added in a PBS buffer solution (1% v/v DMSO) containing MgPc either in its free form or as ICs at the concentration of 5 μM. The solution was irradiated at 661 nm. Irradiation was performed using a 661 nm with a power density output of 14 mW/cm2. During irradiation, samples were constantly stirred using a magnetic stirrer. For the evaluation of the ROS production, the fluorescence spectrum of CM-H2DCFDA was recorded every 2 min for 10 min using a Perkin-Elmer LS45 luminescence spectrometer.

2.7. Cell Culture Conditions

The cells were cultivated in 75 cm2 culture flasks (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose, supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% antibiotic–antimitotic, 0.5% streptomycin-penicillin, and gentamicin. Cells were kept at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator, trypsinized, and re-seeded into fresh medium every 3–5 days.

2.8. Cell Viability Assessment, MTT Assay

Cell viability was evaluated by the MTT colorimetric assay, which measures the capacity of mitochondrial dehydrogenase to reduce MTT to purple formazan crystals. The MTT test assesses the number of surviving cells.
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (6000 cells/well) and grown overnight at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Exponentially growing cells were treated accordingly (dark toxicity, light toxicity, photodynamic treatment). Twenty-four hours after their treatment, the medium was removed and the MTT solution (0.65 mg/mL) was added to each well. The cells were kept in the incubator for 3 h to allow the metabolism of MTT and then the medium was removed and 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added, resulting in the solubilization of the formazan crystals. The absorbance was recorded at 570 nm (peak of formazan absorption spectrum) using an Epoch 2 microplate reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The results were expressed as % cell viability = (mean optical density (OD) of treated cells/mean OD of untreated cells) × 100. All measurements were carried out in triplicate and all data were expressed as means ± standard deviation.

2.8.1. Dark Toxicity Studies

After seeding of the cells in the 96-well plates and incubating for 24 h, the cells were treated with different concentrations (0.05 μM, 0.5 μM, 1 μM, 3 μM, and 5 μM) of MgPc in its free form or in the ICs for 24 h. Finally, cellular survival was measured with the MTT assay.

2.8.2. Light Toxicity Studies

Twenty-four hours after seeding the cells in 96-well plates, the culture medium was removed from the wells and PBS was added (40 μL) so as to slightly cover the cells’ monolayer. The cells were then irradiated at 661 nm with power density at cellular level of 18 mW/cm2. Exposure times were 60 s, 120 s, and 180 s resulting in fluence rates of 1.08, 2.16, and 3.24 J/cm2, respectively. Following irradiation, fresh medium was added, and the cells were maintained in the humidified incubator for 24 h. Finally, cellular viability was assessed via MTT method as described previously.

2.9. Photodynamic Treatment

After their seeding for 24 h, cells were incubated with 0.5 μM of freshly prepared solutions of MgPc and its cyclodextrin complexes in enriched medium for 4 h. In continuation, the medium containing the photosensitizers was removed, 40 μL of PBS were added in each well, and the cells were irradiated with fluence rates of 1.08, 2.16, and 3.24 J/cm2 as indicated for the light toxicity studies. Following irradiation, fresh medium was added, and the cells were incubated for another 24 h. Finally, cell viability was measured with the MTT assay.

2.10. Irradiation Device

Irradiation was performed using a 661 nm diode laser system coupled to an optical fiber and a light diffuser (GCSLS-10-1500m, China Daheng Group, Beijing, China) in order to provide a uniform circular illumination spot. At each experimental condition, three wells were irradiated, and the laser spot was centered to them. Before and after cellular irradiation, laser power was measured at the cellular level using a power meter. Irradiance variability in different points of the irradiated area was less than 2%.

2.11. Intracellular Localization

A431 cells were seeded in glass coverslips (10 × 104 cells) and incubated overnight in 2.5 mL of complete medium (DMEM). Cells were subsequently treated with MgPc or its cyclodextrin complexes (0.5 μM final concentration) for 4 h. Cells were observed under an epifluorescent upright microscope, Olympus BX-50 (Olympus Optical Co., GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), using a 40× objective lens (UPlanFl, N.A. = 0.75, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) coupled to a CCD camera (XC-30, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). Image acquisition was performed using the analySIS getIT software version 5.1 (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) [23].

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of the Stoichiometry of the ICs Using Job’s Plot

The Job’s plot diagram is presented in Figure 2. Τhe maximum for the molar ratio (r) is determined to be 0.33. This value indicates that the stoichiometry of this IC is 1:2 MgPc/β-CD (Figure S1). This result is also compliant with experiments conducted in similar studies [24] for β-CD ICs with chemically modified zinc phthalocyanines.

3.2. Characterization of the CD-MgPc ICs

3.2.1. Process Yield and Inclusion Efficiency

The process yield values as well as the inclusion efficiency are presented in Table 1. For the determination of %IE, the calibration curve for MgPc in DMSO was used. The absorption was measured at 673.4 nm. The %PY and the %IE for each IC are shown in Table 1.
Based on the Table 1, β-CD displays the highest %PY, while HP-β-CD displays the highest inclusion efficiency followed by β-CD. Me-β-CD and γ-CD display lower encapsulation efficiency values.

3.2.2. Size, Polydispersity Index (PDI), and ζ-Potential

For the ICs that were produced in this study, the size, the PDI, and the ζ-potential are shown in Table 2.
Using different CDs, the size and the stability of the system vary. The hydrodynamic diameter of the prepared ICs ranges from 564.5 ± 52.6 (for the β-CD-MgPc complex) to 748.7 ± 52.0 nm (for the γ-CD-MgPc complex). The PDI ranges from 0.522 to 0.566 in all cases and indicates moderately uniform distribution of the particles’ sizes. It is well known that CDs have the tendency to aggregate in aqueous solutions at room temperature merely because of the lack of sufficient charge on their surface. Usually, the aggregation does not take place in a uniform manner, thus affecting the PDI of the ICs. In regard to the ζ-potential, it is lower (absolute value) in the case of HP-β-CD-MgPc and γ-CD-MgPc (−17.7 ± 0.5 mV and −14.9 ± 4.0 mV, respectively) and higher in the case of β-CD-MgPc and Me-β-CD-MgPc (−29.8 ± 1.18 mV and −23.0 ± 1.6 mV, respectively).
These values indicate moderate to high stability of the particles in an aqueous dispersion [25,26]. More specifically, the ICs consisting of HP-β-CD and γ-CD, display moderate stability while the ICs with β-CD and Me-β-CD display higher stability.

3.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR Spectroscopy)

FT-IR spectroscopy is widely used to investigate the interactions between the host molecule and the guest molecule [27,28]. In the FT-IR spectrum of pure MgPc, the most characteristic absorption bands that are observed are at 1525, 1483, 1333, 1057, 888, and 728 cm−1. The band at 1525 cm−1 is attributed to the C=C-C stretching of the aromatic ring, whereas the band at 1483 cm−1 is owed to the C-C stretching vibration of the isoindole structure. The bands at 1333 and 1057 cm−1 are owed to the C-C stretching and the C-N stretching vibrations of the pyrrole ring, respectively. At 888 cm−1 the absorbance can be attributed to the Mg-N stretching vibration, whereas the band at 727 cm−1 is owed to out of plane deformation of the C-H bond [29]. In Table 3, the characteristic absorption bands of the pure CDs as well as the peaks for the different ICs, the prepared physical mixture, and the solvent free kneading product are reported.
For all of the spectra of the prepared CD-MgPc ICs, a similarity with the spectrum of the pure CD used in each case is observed. In all of the ICs, there is a shift of the characteristic bands of the pure CDs, especially for the stretching vibration of the O-H group which presents the largest shift. Furthermore, there is a significant shift of the bands that were attributed to the antisymmetric stretch of the C-H bond of the CH2 group as well as to the bending vibration of the O-H group, which is an indication of the interaction between the different CDs and MgPc.
In addition, the characteristic absorption band of pure MgPc at 1525 cm−1 is shifted in the spectra of the ICs (β-CD-MgPc IC: 1521 cm−1, HP-β-CD-MgPc IC: 1528 cm−1, Me-β-CD-MgPc IC: 1521 cm−1), which also indicates an interaction between the two components. Finally, the characteristic band of pure MgPc at 728 cm−1 is still noticeable in the spectra for the ICs, which indicates that only part of the phthalocyanine is located in the interior part of the CDs. This result has also been noted in other studies [11,30], which concluded that only part of the phthalocyanine is inserted in the hydrophobic cavity of cyclodextrins.
The FT-IR spectra of the physical mixture of HP-β-CD and MgPc and of the corresponding solvent-free kneading product present significant similarities. It is noteworthy that all the characteristic absorption bands of MgPc are present in both spectra, whereas in the spectra of the ICs only a few of them are evident, which is indicative of the successful formation of the ICs when the appropriate preparation method is applied.

3.2.4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR Spectroscopy)

NMR spectroscopy is an extremely useful technique for studying the structure of organic compounds, especially in the case of ICs since it provides essential information on the structure of supramolecular host–guest complexes [31]. The NMR analysis for the ICs of CDs with MgPc and of the HP-β-CD and MgPc physical mixture was performed in DMSO-d6 at 600 MHz. The structure of the β-CD monomer and its 3D depiction can be seen in Figure 3.
In the 1H-NMR spectra, the changes of the chemical shifts of the protons inside and outside of the cavity of the CDs can be identified, which can be informative regarding the inclusion mode and the affinity between the different CDs and MgPc.
The change of the chemical shifts for β-CD and the β-CD-MgPc ICs are presented in Table 4. A notable change of the chemical shift was identified for H-5, which is located inside the cavity of β-CD. Similar changes of the chemical shifts are observed for protons H-1, H-2, H-3, and H-6, from which H-3 and H-6 are located within the cavity while H-1 and H-2 are located outside the cavity (Figure 3). More specifically, all of the aforementioned protons displayed a downfield shift after the formation of the ICs, which is an indication of the proximity of β-CD to an electronegative atom, such as nitrogen in the structure of MgPc. Moreover, the observed shielding of H-5, H-3, and H-6, indicates that a part of the MgPc molecule interacts with the protons in the hydrophobic region of the host-molecule while another part of the MgPc molecule is located outside of the cavity, forming non-inclusion complexes or aggregates. This is in accordance with the FT-IR analysis results.
From Table 5, significant changes in chemical shifts are observed for H-4 and H-1 of Me-β-CD, both located on the outer surface of the cavity. It is also noteworthy that no significant differences in the chemical shifts are observed for the H-3 and H-5 protons that are located inside the Me-β-CD’s hydrophobic cavity. Moreover, the downfield shifts are an indication of the proximity of Me-β-CD to an electronegative atom, such as nitrogen in the structure of MgPc [32]. These data indicate that MgPc is retained at the exterior surface of Me-β-CD, forming non-inclusion complexes or aggregations, and interacting with the exterior oxygen atoms of Me-β-CD.
Based on the data of Table 6, significant changes in chemical shifts were observed for the H-2, H-4, and H-7 of HP-β-CD. These upfield shifts indicate that the MgPc molecule interacts with the protons that are located outside the cavity, as well as with the H-7 of the methylene group which is also located outside the cavity. As far as the protons that are located inside the cavity are concerned, a significant downfield shift is noted for the H-3 (Δδ = 0.024 ppm), while for H-5 the ∆δ is significantly smaller (Δδ = 0.008 ppm), indicative of the partial inclusion of the MgPc inside the cavity and the orientation of MgPc molecules towards the largest rim of the HP-β-CD. The downfield shift is possibly attributed to the proximity of HP-β-CD with an electronegative atom, such as nitrogen in the structure of MgPc [11,33].
However, an upfield shift is observed for protons H-3, H-5, and H-6 in the spectra of the physical mixture of HP-β-CD and MgPc (Table 7), along with lower Δδ compared to the HP-β-CD-MgPc IC. Moreover, in the 1H NMR spectrum of the physical mixture, a better signal splitting of the protons’ peaks of MgPc is clearly observed, whereas in the inclusion complex spectrum, a broadening of the peaks occurred (Figure S2). Thus, these observations revealed the successful formation of the HP-β-CD-MgPc IC when using the kneading method [33].

3.3. In Vitro Release Studies of the MgPc from the CD-MgPc ICs

The determination of the release profile of a drug delivery system is of great significance since it provides vital information concerning its use for specific applications. The release profile of MgPc from the different ICs is shown in Figure 4.
As it is observed in Figure 4, for all the ICs, the release profiles display similar behavior. More specifically, all of the CD-MgPc ICs, display a rapid release (“burst effect”) of MgPc in the first 20 min. In this timeframe, 72%, 76%, and 85% MgPc is released for β-CD-MgPc, HP-β-CD-MgPc, and Me-βCD-MgPc, respectively. This rapid release is attributed to the diffusion of MgPc molecules located on the outer surface of the CDs due to weak interactions. After the burst effect there is a decrease in the rate of release (“lag effect”) and after 1h, there is a “plateau” indicating the sustained release of MgPc.
The IC that displays the fastest release of MgPc is the one with Me-β-CD, followed by β-CD, and lastly HP-β-CD. Especially in the case of the Me-β-CD-MgPc ICs, the fastest release profile is also in accordance with the 1H-NMR results which indicated that MgPc is mostly located on the surface of the Me-β-CD.

Kinetic Modeling of the MgPc Release from the CD-MgPc ICs

In Table 8, the equations for each model used in order to fit the data derived from the in vitro release analysis are presented. The fitting (R2) can be compared for each model in order to determine which one describes the release more efficiently. The most effective fitting of the data is noted when the Korsmeyer–Peppas model is used for all the different ICs.
The diffusion exponent n, as it is derived from the graphs for the different ICs, are presented in Table 9. The values of n indicate, that for all the ICs, the release mechanism is non-Fickian anomalous transport (Figure 5) [21,22].

3.4. Optical Properties of CD-MgPc ICs

3.4.1. Absorption Spectroscopy

Figure 6 displays the absorption spectra of pure MgPc and the corresponding ICs.
The dominant peak of MgPc is observed at approximately 670 nm, while this peak seems to have shifted to longer wavelengths for all ICs except for β-CD MgPc. This is due to the interaction of MgPc and the different CDs in order to form the supramolecular structure of the ICs. The dominant peak of phthalocyanines was also less visible after the complexation, which has been noted in other studies as well [34]. It is also worth mentioning that Me-β-CD MgPc and HP-β-CD MgPc also exhibited a new peak at a longer wavelength, which was not visible elsewhere in any of the other CD-MgPc ICs.

3.4.2. ROS Production Evaluation

For studying the production of ROS from the ICs and the pure MgPc, the samples underwent laser exposure for specific timeframes and then fluorescent spectrophotometry was used at 490 nm, which is the excitation wavelength for the fluorescent tracer. In Figure 7, ROS production ability of MgPc and the different ICs is displayed for different time intervals. Data are presented as percentage of fluorescein intensity prior to irradiation.
Based on the above diagram, all the substances tested are able to produce ROS. More specifically, the largest ROS production, even higher than the one from pure MgPc, occurs from the IC with HP-β-CD. ICs with Me-β-CD and γ-CD present similar ROS production ability, while β-CD appear to be less active than the others. Based on that, the ICs consisting of modified CDs (Me-β and HP-β-CD) produce ROS faster in aqueous solutions when compared to the ICs prepared with the unmodified, natural β-CD and γ-CD. The increased ROS production capacity of the MgPc in the ICs with HP-β-CD could be attributed to the degradation of the host molecule, leading to the release of free MgPc in the solution which in turn causes higher ROS production after laser treatment [34].

3.5. Photodynamic Treatment

In order to proceed with the photodynamic treatment studies, dark and light toxicity experiments were performed. The appropriate concentration of the photosensitizer should not exhibit cytotoxicity without irradiation, while the applied light energy dose in the absence of photosensitizer should not present cytotoxicity as well. The cytotoxicity results of different concentrations of MgPc against an A431 squamous carcinoma cell line, both in its free form and in complexation with the different cyclodextrins, are presented in Figure 8.
The examined concentrations of MgPc between 1 μM and 5 μM exhibited significant cytotoxicity, leading to their exclusion from further studies. However, cell treatment with a concentration of 0.5 μM of MgPc for 24 h did not affect the cell viability. In addition, light irradiation at 661 nm with power density of 18 mW/cm2 and fluence rates of 1.08, 2.16, and 3.24 J/cm2 was also found to be non-cytotoxic. Consequently, the photodynamic effect of MgPc and its cyclodextrin complexes against A431 cells was evaluated at the concentration of 0.5 μM, and with a power output density of 18 mW/cm2 for various irradiation times. The results obtained on cell survival are presented in Figure 9.
MgPc exhibited potent photosensitizing activity at the concentration of 0.5 μM under all irradiation conditions, reducing the cell viability to approximately 33% after 3 min of irradiation with 18 mW/cm2. All the examined CD-MgPc ICs presented significant PDT efficacy as well. The γ-CD-MgPc complex was the most promising photosensitizing nanosystem, presenting higher PDT activity than free MgPc, reducing the cell viability to 26% after 3 min of irradiation. This could be possibly attributed to the enhanced cellular uptake of MgPc after its encapsulation in the γ-CD cavity, improving its aqueous solubility and thus reducing its agglomeration [35]. On the other hand, complexation with the less water soluble β-CD [36], lead to an IC which presented the lowest phototoxicity under all the examined irradiation conditions (46% viability after 3 min of irradiation). This observation is in accordance with the ROS production studies in which β-CD-MgPc IC presented significantly lower ROS production ability than free MgPc and all the examined ICs. Overall, complexation of different phthalocyanines with cyclodextrins can be considered as an effective strategy for PDT efficiency improvement [37,38].

3.6. Intracellular Localization Studies

Intracellular localization was studied using fluorescence microscopy. Indicative images of A431 cells incubated with 0.5 μM of MgPc and γ-CD-MgPc IC for 4 h are shown in Figure 10.
Any of the substances used did not affect cell structure and no nuclear localization was observed at 4 h of incubation. Fluorescence images presented higher fluorescence values in the case of cells incubated with γ-CD-MgPc compared to pure MgPc, indicating augmented cellular uptake of MgPc after its complexation with γ-CD. These findings are in accordance and can also explain the photodynamic efficiency results which showed that γ-CD-MgPc is more phototoxic than pure MgPc. It is also worth mentioning that after incubation for 4 h, cell structure was not affected, and no nuclear localization was observed at this incubation time.

4. Conclusions

The current research work demonstrated the successful preparation of inclusion complexes of natural (β-CD, γ-CD) and chemically modified cyclodextrins (HP-β-CD, Me-β-CD) with magnesium phthalocyanine (MgPc) via the kneading method. MgPc was successfully encapsulated with satisfactory inclusion efficiency values between 59% and 81%. The average size of the ICs ranged from 564 to 748 nm while the zeta potential ranged from −15 to −30 mV, indicating mild to high stability for the formed ICs. Moreover, the ICs were structurally characterized via FT-IR and NMR spectroscopy, which demonstrated the successful formation of the ICs, as well as that it is most likely that only part of the phthalocyanine molecule is located inside the respective cyclodextrin’s cavity. The Job’s plot study indicated that the stoichiometry of the produced ICs is cyclodextrin:MgPc = 2:1. Release studies of MgPc from the ICs at 37 °C and a pH of 7.4 indicated a burst effect in the first 20 min in which approximately 70% of the encapsulated MgPc was released. The release data had better fit on the Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetics, while the release mechanism is described as anomalous transfer.
The ICs were tested for their ability to produce ROS, presenting satisfactory ROS production when irradiated with a laser at 661 nm. The photodynamic therapy studies against a squamous carcinoma A431 cell line indicated a potent photosensitizing activity of MgPc (33% cell viability after irradiation for 3 min with 18 mW/cm2), as well as of the γ-CD-MgPc IC which was the most promising photosensitizing nanosystem, presenting the best PDT activity (cell viability 26% after 3 min of irradiation). Finally, intracellular localization studies indicated the enhanced cellular uptake of MgPc when encapsulated in the γ-CD cavity. Overall, CD-MgPc ICs can be considered as promising nanosystems for the sustained release of MgPc and the effective PDT cancer treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bioengineering10020244/s1, Figure S1: Possible orientation of the MgPc molecule towards the CDs’ cavity according to the Job’s Plot studies; Figure S2: 1H NMR of the: HP-β-CD-MgPc IC and the physical mixture of HP-β-CD and MgPc.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D. and E.K.; methodology, E.K., C.T.-K., A.K. (Annita Katopodi), A.K. (Alexandros Kalospyros) and E.A.; resources, A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K., C.T.-K., A.K. (Annita Katopodi) and A.K. (Alexandros Kalospyros); writing—review & editing, E.K., E.A. and A.D.; supervision, A.D.; project administration, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kröger, J.; Néel, N.; Berndt, R.; Wang, Y.F.; Gopakumar, T.G. Exploring the Organic–Inorganic Interface With a Scanning Tunneling Microscope. In Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 81–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Claessens, C.G.; Hahn, U.; Torres, T. Phthalocyanines: From outstanding electronic properties to emerging applications. Chem. Rec. 2008, 8, 75–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allen, C.M.; Sharman, W.M.; Van Lier, J.E. Current status of phthalocyanines in the photodynamic therapy of cancer. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2001, 5, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schmidt, J.; Kuzyniak, W.; Berkholz, J.; Steinemann, G.; Ogbodu, R.; Hoffmann, B.; Nouailles, G.; Gürek, A.G.; Nitzsche, B.; Höpfner, M. Novel zinc-and silicon-phthalocyanines as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roguin, L.P.; Chiarante, N.; Vior, M.C.; Marino, J. Zinc (II) phthalocyanines as photosensitizers for antitumor photodynamic therapy. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 114, 105575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Halevas, E.; Arvanitidou, M.; Mavroidi, B.; Hatzidimitriou, A.G.; Politopoulos, K.; Alexandratou, E.; Pelecanou, M.; Sagnou, M. A novel curcumin gallium complex as photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy: Synthesis, structural and physicochemical characterization, photophysical properties and in vitro studies against breast cancer cells. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1240, 130485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kazantzis, K.T.; Koutsonikoli, K.; Mavroidi, B.; Zachariadis, M.; Alexiou, P.; Pelecanou, M.; Politopoulos, K.; Alexandratou, E.; Sagnou, M. Curcumin derivatives as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy: Photophysical properties and in vitro studies with prostate cancer cells. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2020, 19, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Calixto, G.M.; Bernegossi, J.; De Freitas, L.M.; Fontana, C.R.; Chorilli, M. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for photodynamic therapy of cancer: A review. Molecules 2016, 21, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lin, X.; Wang, R.; Pan, S.; Yang, H.; Peng, Y. Three components encapsulated nanoparticles: Preparation and photophysical property. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, D.; Wong, R.C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; Yang, Z.; Lo, P.C. Shifting the absorption to the near-infrared region and inducing a strong photothermal effect by encapsulating zinc (II) phthalocyanine in poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2020, 116, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nkanga, C.I.; Krause, R.W.M. Encapsulation of isoniazid-conjugated phthalocyanine-in-cyclodextrin-in-Liposomes Using Heating Method. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Borlan, R.; Stoia, D.; Gaina, L.; Campu, A.; Marc, G.; Perde-Schrepler, M.; Silion, M.; Maniu, D.; Focsan, M.; Astilean, S. Fluorescent Phthalocyanine-Encapsulated Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Their Deployment as Therapeutic Agents in the NIR Region. Molecules 2021, 26, 4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gidwani, B.; Vyas, A. A comprehensive review on cyclodextrin-based carriers for delivery of chemotherapeutic cytotoxic anticancer drugs. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 198268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mihoub, A.B.; Youssef, Z.; Colombeau, L.; Jouan-Hureaux, V.; Arnoux, P.; Frochot, C.; Vanderesse, R.; Acherar, S. Inclusion complex vs. conjugation of hydrophobic photosensitizers with β-cyclodextrin: Improved disaggregation and photodynamic therapy efficacy against glioblastoma cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 109, 110604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sergey, V.K.; Thorsteinn, L. Cyclodextrins. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 453, 167–180. [Google Scholar]
  16. Crini, G. A history of cyclodextrins. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10940–10975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jansook, P.; Ogawa, N.; Loftsson, T. Cyclodextrins: Structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 535, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Srivastava, A.; Hunter, J.M. Reversal of neuromuscular block. Br. J. Anaesth. 2009, 103, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Halahlah, A.; Kavetsou, E.; Pitterou, I.; Grigorakis, S.; Loupassaki, S.; Tziveleka, L.A.; Kikionis, S.; Ioannou, E.; Detsi, A. Synthesis and characterization of inclusion complexes of rosemary essential oil with various β-cyclodextrins and evaluation of their antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 65, 102660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adjali, A.; Pontillo, A.R.; Kavetsou, E.; Katopodi, A.; Tzani, A.; Grigorakis, S.; Loupassaki, S.; Detsi, A. Clove Essential Oil–Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes: Preparation, Characterization and Incorporation in Biodegradable Chitosan Films. Micro 2022, 2, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bruschi, M.L. Strategies to Modify the Drug Release from Pharmaceutical Systems; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 63–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mircioiu, C.; Voicu, V.; Anuta, V.; Tudose, A.; Celia, C.; Paolino, D.; Fresta, M.; Sandulovici, R.; Mircioiu, I. Mathematical Modeling of Release Kinetics from Supramolecular Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giannakopoulos, E.; Katopodi, A.; Rallis, M.; Politopoulos, K.; Alexandratou, E. The effects of low power laser light at 661 nm on wound healing in a scratch assay fibroblast model. Lasers Med. Sci. 2023, 38, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Leng, X.; Choi, C.F.; Luo, H.B.; Cheng, Y.K.; Ng, D.K. Host-Guest Interactions of 4-Carboxyphenoxy Phthalocyanines and β-Cyclodextrins in Aqueous Media. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2497–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, R. Particle Characterization: Light Scattering Methods; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 289–343. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kotronia, M.; Kavetsou, E.; Loupassaki, S.; Kikionis, S.; Vouyiouka, S.; Detsi, A. Encapsulation of Oregano (Origanum onites L.) essential oil in β-cyclodextrin (β-CD): Synthesis and characterization of the inclusion complexes. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bratu, I.; Hernanz, A.; Gavira, J.M.; Bora, G.H. FT-IR spectroscopy of inclusion complexes of beta-cyclodextrin with fenbufen and ibuprofen. Rom. J. Phys. 2005, 50, 1063. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rachmawati, H.; Edityaningrum, C.A.; Mauludin, R. Molecular Inclusion Complex of Curcumin–-Cyclodextrin Nanoparticle to Enhance Curcumin Skin Permeability from Hydrophilic Matrix Gel. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013, 14, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Janczak, J.; Idemori, Y.M. Synthesis, crystal structure and charac-terisation of aquamagnesium phthalocyanine—MgPc (H2O). The origin of an in- tense near-IR absorption of magnesium phthalocyanine known as ‘X-phase’. Polyhedron 2003, 22, 1167–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ben Mihoub, A.; Larue, L.; Moussaron, A.; Youssef, Z.; Colombeau, L.; Baros, F.; Frochot, C.; Vanderesse, R.; Acherar, S. Use of cyclodextrins in anticancer photodynamic therapy treatment. Molecules 2018, 23, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schneider, H.J.; Hacket, F.; Rudiger, V.; Ikeda, H. NMR studies of cyclodextrins and cyclodextrin complexes. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1755–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Venuti, V.; Crupi, V.; Fazio, B.; Majolino, D.; Acri, G.; Testagrossa, B.; Stancanelli, R.; De Gaetano, F.; Gagliardi, A.; Paolino, D. Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Idebenone/Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pessine, F.B.; Calderini, A.; Alexandrino, G.L. Cyclodextrin inclusion complexes probed by NMR techniques. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2012, 3, 264. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fu, J.; Li, X.Y.; Ng, D.K.; Wu, C. Encapsulation of phthalocyanines in biodegradable poly (sebacic anhydride) nanoparticles. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3843–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lourenço, L.M.O.; Pereira, P.M.R.; Maciel, E.; Valega, M.; Domingues, F.M.J.; Domingues, M.R.M.; Neves, M.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Fernandes, R.; Tome, J.P.C. Amphiphilic phthalocyanine-cyclodextrin conjugates for cancer photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 8363–8366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Saokham, P.; Muankaew, C.; Jansook, P.; Loftsson, T. Solubility of cyclodextrins and drug/cyclodextrin complexes. Molecules 2018, 23, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lu, S.; Wang, A.; Ma, Y.J.; Xuan, H.Y.; Zhao, B.; Li, X.D.; Zhou, J.H.; Zhou, L.; Wei, S.H. Cyclodextrin type dependent host-guest interaction mode with phthalocyanine and their influence on photodynamic activity to cancer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 148, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Reisa, T.A.; Jaculia, A.E.; Ramosb, K.L.V.; Souza PE, N.; Veiga-Souzac, F.H.; Joanittid, G.A.; Azevedob, R.B.; Gratieria, T.; Cunha-Filhoa, M.; Gelfusoa, G.M. Combination of cyclodextrin complexation and iontophoresis as a promising strategy for the cutaneous delivery of aluminum-chloride phthalocyanine in photodynamic therapy. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 139, 105056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of (a) 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, (b) methyl-β-cyclodextrin, (c) γ-cyclodextrin, and (d) magnesium phthalocyanine.
Figure 1. Structures of (a) 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, (b) methyl-β-cyclodextrin, (c) γ-cyclodextrin, and (d) magnesium phthalocyanine.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g001
Figure 2. Job’s plot figure to determine the stoichiometry of the β-CD-MgPc IC.
Figure 2. Job’s plot figure to determine the stoichiometry of the β-CD-MgPc IC.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g002
Figure 3. Left: numbering of β-glucopyranose monomer for the different CDs, right: structure of the CDs.
Figure 3. Left: numbering of β-glucopyranose monomer for the different CDs, right: structure of the CDs.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g003
Figure 4. Release profile of MgPc from the different CD-MgPc ICs.
Figure 4. Release profile of MgPc from the different CD-MgPc ICs.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g004
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic model of MgPc in vitro release.
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic model of MgPc in vitro release.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g005
Figure 6. Absorbance of the ICs and pure MgPc.
Figure 6. Absorbance of the ICs and pure MgPc.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g006
Figure 7. ROS production ability of the prepared CD-MgPc ICs at the concentration of 5 μM.
Figure 7. ROS production ability of the prepared CD-MgPc ICs at the concentration of 5 μM.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g007
Figure 8. Effect of different concentrations of MgPc in free form or encapsulated in the different complexes on the A431 cell viability. * p < 0.05 versus control; ** p < 0.005 versus control; *** p < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 8. Effect of different concentrations of MgPc in free form or encapsulated in the different complexes on the A431 cell viability. * p < 0.05 versus control; ** p < 0.005 versus control; *** p < 0.0001 versus control.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g008
Figure 9. Effect of irradiation of MgPc and its cyclodextrin complexes (0.5 μM) with 18 mW/cm2 for 1 min, 2 min, and 3 min on the cell viability of A431 cell line. ** p < 0.005 versus control; *** p < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 9. Effect of irradiation of MgPc and its cyclodextrin complexes (0.5 μM) with 18 mW/cm2 for 1 min, 2 min, and 3 min on the cell viability of A431 cell line. ** p < 0.005 versus control; *** p < 0.0001 versus control.
Bioengineering 10 00244 g009
Figure 10. Fluorescence microscopic images of A431 cancer cells that were incubated for 4 h with 0.5 μM of MgPc (left) and γ-CD-MgPc IC (right).
Figure 10. Fluorescence microscopic images of A431 cancer cells that were incubated for 4 h with 0.5 μM of MgPc (left) and γ-CD-MgPc IC (right).
Bioengineering 10 00244 g010
Table 1. Inclusion efficiency and process yield for ICs containing MgPc and different CDs.
Table 1. Inclusion efficiency and process yield for ICs containing MgPc and different CDs.
SamplesMgPc:CD Ratio
(mol)
%Inclusion Efficiency
(%EE)
%Process Yield
(%PY)
β-CD1:18182
HP-β-CD1:19776
γ-CD1:16779
Me-β-CD1:15969
Table 2. Size, PDI, and ζ-potential of the ICs.
Table 2. Size, PDI, and ζ-potential of the ICs.
SamplesMean Hydrodynamic Radius (nm)Polydispersity Indexζ-Potential (mV)
β-CD-MgPc564.5 ± 52.60.522 ± 0.024−29.8 ± 1.2
HP-β-CD-MgPc688.4 ± 105.10.552 ± 0.053−17.7 ± 0.5
Me-β-CD-MgPc746.1 ± 37.10.534 ± 0.014−23.0 ± 1.6
γ-CD-MgPc748.7 ± 52.00.566 ± 0.043−14.9 ± 4.0
Table 3. Characteristic absorption bands of the tested compounds and products.
Table 3. Characteristic absorption bands of the tested compounds and products.
Characteristic Absorption Bands (cm−1)
O-H
Stretching
C-H
Stretching
C-H
Antisymmetric Stretching of CH2
C=C-C Stretching (Aromatic)C-C Stretching Vibration
(Isoindole)
O-H
Bending
C-C
Stretching
(Pyrrole)
C-N
Stretching
(Pyrrole)
C-O Stretching (Secondary Alcohols)Mg-N Stretching VibrationC-H
Out of Plane Deformation
MgPc---15251483-13331057-888728
β-CD337629241643--1414--1028--
β-CD-MgPc341129201646152114821417--1027-727
HP-β-CD341329261640--1468--1038--
HP-β-CD-MgPc34112926164615281482---1030-727
Me-β-CD341929311640--1457--1043--
Me-β-CD-MgPc34142926165115211482---1044-725
HP-β-CD-MgPc (solvent free kneading)341329251639152514811454133310571032889731
HP-β-CD-MgPc (physical mixture)341329271639152214811469133110571032889730
Table 4. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of β-CD and β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
Table 4. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of β-CD and β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
ProtonChemical Shifts (δ1) of β-CD Protons (ppm)Chemical Shifts (δ2) of β-CD Protons in the β-CD-MgPc ICs (ppm)δ = δ2δ1 (ppm)
H-14.8264.8020.024
H-23.33.2760.024
H-33.6323.6080.024
H-43.3533.3330.020
H-53.5593.5340.025
H-63.6323.6080.024
Table 5. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of Me-β-CD and Me-β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
Table 5. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of Me-β-CD and Me-β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
ProtonChemical Shifts (δ1) of Me-β-CD Protons (ppm)Chemical Shifts (δ2) of Me-β-CD Protons in the Me-β-CD-MgPc ICs (ppm)δ = δ2δ1 (ppm)
H-15.0625.0520.01
H-23.233.2210.009
H-33.4783.470.008
H-43.3513.2980.053
H-53.4783.470.008
H-63.4783.470.008
Table 6. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of HP-β-CD and HP-β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
Table 6. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of HP-β-CD and HP-β-CD in the ICs with MgPc.
ProtonChemical Shifts (δ1) of HP-β-CD Protons (ppm)Chemical Shifts (δ2 of HP-β-CD Protons in the HP-β-CD-MgPc ICs (ppm)δ = δ2δ1 (ppm)
H-14.9805.000−0.020
H-23.3533.297−0.056
H-33.7343.7220.024
H-43.3533.297−0.056
H-53.5973.5890.008
H-63.5973.5890.008
H-73.3533.297−0.056
H-83.7343.7220.024
H-91.0090.9940.015
Table 7. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of HP-β-CD and HP-β-CD in the physical mixture with MgPc.
Table 7. Chemical shift changes (∆δ) of 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) signals of HP-β-CD and HP-β-CD in the physical mixture with MgPc.
ProtonChemical Shifts (δ1) of HP-β-CD Protons (ppm)Chemical Shifts (δ2) of HP-β-CD Protons in the HP-β-CD and MgPc Physical Mixture (ppm)δ = δ2δ1 (ppm)
H-14.9804.992−0.012
H-23.3533.3110.042
H-33.7343.741−0.07
H-43.3533.3110.042
H-53.5973.599−0.002
H-63.5973.599−0.002
H-73.3533.3110.042
H-83.7343.741−0.007
H-91.0091.012−0.003
Table 8. R2 for different kinetic models based on the data from the release profile analysis.
Table 8. R2 for different kinetic models based on the data from the release profile analysis.
ICZero OrderFirst OrderHiguchiKorsmeyer-Peppas
R2R2R2R2
Me-β-CD-MgPc0.3140.2380.5860.806
β-CD-MgPc0.3710.2520.6530.823
HP-β-CD-MgPc0.4080.2640.6930.837
Table 9. Diffusion exponent n based on the Korsmeyer-Peppas equations.
Table 9. Diffusion exponent n based on the Korsmeyer-Peppas equations.
ICKorsmeyer-PeppasDiffusion Exponent
R2Equation
Me-β-CD-MgPc0.806y = 0.825x + 0.3450.825
β-CD-MgPc0.823y = 0.819x + 0.3250.819
HP-β-CD-MgPc0.837y = 0.814x + 0.3060.814
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kavetsou, E.; Tsoukalas-Koulas, C.; Katopodi, A.; Kalospyros, A.; Alexandratou, E.; Detsi, A. Ιnclusion Complexes of Magnesium Phthalocyanine with Cyclodextrins as Potential Photosensitizing Agents. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020244

AMA Style

Kavetsou E, Tsoukalas-Koulas C, Katopodi A, Kalospyros A, Alexandratou E, Detsi A. Ιnclusion Complexes of Magnesium Phthalocyanine with Cyclodextrins as Potential Photosensitizing Agents. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(2):244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kavetsou, Eleni, Charalampos Tsoukalas-Koulas, Annita Katopodi, Alexandros Kalospyros, Eleni Alexandratou, and Anastasia Detsi. 2023. "Ιnclusion Complexes of Magnesium Phthalocyanine with Cyclodextrins as Potential Photosensitizing Agents" Bioengineering 10, no. 2: 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020244

APA Style

Kavetsou, E., Tsoukalas-Koulas, C., Katopodi, A., Kalospyros, A., Alexandratou, E., & Detsi, A. (2023). Ιnclusion Complexes of Magnesium Phthalocyanine with Cyclodextrins as Potential Photosensitizing Agents. Bioengineering, 10(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop