Next Article in Journal
IgG Subtype Response against Virulence-Associated Protein A in Foals Naturally Infected with Rhodococcus equi
Previous Article in Journal
Spermiogram, Kinetics, Flow Cytometric Characteristics and DNA Damage Degree in Boar Ejaculates: Summarization and Clustering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Liquid Vitamin A and E Formulations in Veterinary and Livestock Production: Applications and Perspectives

Nutrition & Health Division, BASF SE, 67063 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(9), 421; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090421
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 7 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Vitamins A and E are crucial for animal health, contributing to key functions such as vision, immune response, growth, reproduction, and neurological development. A deficiency in these micronutrients can lead to serious health issues. Supplementation, especially with innovative liquid formulations, is important for addressing these deficiencies and enhancing animal health and productivity. Administering these vitamins through drinking water offers a convenient method, especially during times of stress or increased nutritional demands. Injectable forms can enhance reproductive health, growth, and immune function in livestock, while liquid drops provide a precise and easy way to dose companion animals. Future research may focus on optimizing these formulations, developing specialized treatments, and leveraging nutrigenomics to customize animal nutrition, leading to advancements in veterinary care and livestock management.

Abstract

Vitamins A and E are vital fat-soluble micronutrients with distinct yet intertwined roles in various biological processes. This review delves into their functions, nutritional requirements across different animal species, the consequences of deficiencies, and the impact of liquid formulations on veterinary medicine and livestock production. Vitamin A exists in multiple forms, essential for vision, immunity, and growth, while vitamin E acts primarily as an antioxidant, safeguarding cell membranes from oxidative damage. Hypovitaminosis in these vitamins can lead to severe health consequences, affecting vision, immunity, growth, reproduction, and neurological functions. Hence, supplementation, particularly through innovative liquid formulations, becomes pivotal in addressing deficiencies and enhancing overall animal health and productivity. Injectable forms of vitamins A and E show promise in enhancing reproductive performance, growth, and immune function in livestock. Administering these vitamins through drinking water offers a convenient way to enhance livestock health and productivity, particularly during times of stress or increased nutritional needs. Liquid vitamin A and E drops offer a flexible and effective solution in veterinary practice, allowing precise dosing and easy administration, particularly for companion animals. Future research may aim to optimize formulations and explore targeted therapies and precision feeding via nutrigenomics, promising advancements in veterinary medicine and livestock production.

1. Introduction

There are thirteen vitamins (excluding choline) that are used in animal nutrition. From a commercial perspective, vitamin E was the most consumed feed-grade vitamin in 2022, with an estimated market value of around half a billion USD. This was followed by B-group vitamins and vitamin A [1]. Thus, vitamins E and A can be regarded as the most commercially significant fat-soluble vitamins and among the most commercially relevant of all vitamins.
Vitamins A and E are essential micronutrients crucial for the health and performance of animals [2,3]. They are typically included in the diets of both ruminant and monogastric animals through premixes. Though they have distinct biochemical properties—retinoic acid signaling and the visual cycle for vitamin A, and antioxidant defense and membrane stabilization for vitamin E—their functions are interconnected, collectively supporting various bodily systems. For instance, vitamin E regulates redox balance by modulating the NFκB/AKT/mTOR/KEAP1 signaling pathway and NRF2 activation, supports liver histoarchitecture restoration by enhancing oxygen uptake under various stress conditions, and is also suggested to influence the promoter-specific activity of redox-responsive genes [4,5]. As fat-soluble vitamins, they are crucial for modulating immune responses, supporting reproductive functions, and maintaining cellular integrity [6,7,8,9,10]. Deficiencies in these vitamins can lead to numerous health problems, affecting animal welfare and productivity. Liquid formulations of vitamins A and E have been effective alternatives to dry forms in veterinary medicine and livestock production for decades, offering benefits such as precise dosing, ease of administration, and improved bioavailability [11].
Ensuring the well-being and productivity of domesticated animals requires meeting their vitamin A and E requirements, as they cannot synthesize these micronutrients metabolically de novo. The inability to synthesize a vitamin typically arises from the absence of genes responsible for its synthesis, a trait that emerged during the course of evolution [12]. Therefore, their dietary intake or other supplementation routes are crucial. The required level of vitamins A and E in animals depends on several factors, including physiological state, age, health, nutritional status, and function [10]. Understanding the nutritional requirements and factors affecting the intake of vitamins A and E across different animal species is crucial for optimizing health and productivity [3,10,13,14,15,16]. For instance, ruminants, with their complex digestive systems, require careful management of supplemented vitamin levels due to potential losses or degradation in the rumen, particularly for vitamin A [17]. Similarly, the diets of growing monogastric animals, such as poultry and swine, are often pelleted, which can lead to additional vitamin loss [15,18]. Ultimately, the key factor is not the initial amount of vitamin A intended to be supplied to the animal, but how much of this vitamin is actually reaching the animal and how bioavailable the vitamin form is.
Liquid formulations of vitamins A and E, as well as their combinations with other vitamins and active substances, have garnered attention for their enhanced bioavailability and ease of administration, offering some advantages over traditional dry forms. These liquid supplements, commonly utilized in veterinary medicine and livestock production, provide the quick and efficient delivery of essential micronutrients, especially during periods of stress or increased demand [19]. Injectable forms have shown promising results in enhancing reproductive performance and animal growth, with studies demonstrating positive effects on litter size in swine, muscle development, and marbling in beef cattle [20,21,22,23,24,25].
Administering liquid forms of fat-soluble vitamins through water has emerged as a practical strategy for enhancing livestock health and productivity, particularly during periods of illness or stress [11]. Liquid vitamin A and E drops are widely used in veterinary practice, offering a convenient means of addressing deficiencies and promoting overall well-being in companion animals [11,26].
This review aims to explore the role of liquid vitamin A and E in veterinary and livestock production. Despite extensive research on vitamins A and E, there is a notable gap in understanding the comparative effectiveness and specific applications of liquid formulations across different animal species. We hypothesize that liquid vitamin A and E formulations may offer distinct advantages over traditional supplementation methods, including enhanced bioavailability and practical benefits.
Ultimately, this review seeks to enhance our understanding of the role of liquid vitamin A and E in veterinary and livestock practices. Such knowledge can guide the development of more effective management strategies to address deficiencies, improve stress resilience, and enhance overall animal well-being and productivity.

2. Roles and Nutritional Needs across Animal Species

Vitamins A and E are vital fat-soluble micronutrients. They play key roles in various biological processes crucial for cellular health and overall physiological well-being.

2.1. Vitamin A

Vitamin A includes compounds like all-trans-retinol, retinal (retinaldehyde), and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), each essential for different bodily functions [27]. Retinol, primarily stored in the liver, can be converted into retinal and ATRA as needed [10] (Figure 1). Retinal is vital for vision, especially in low-light conditions, as it combines with opsin proteins in the retina to form rhodopsin, a pigment critical for phototransduction [28].
Beyond vision, vitamin A is crucial for cellular differentiation and proliferation. ATRA, the active metabolite of retinol, regulates gene expression by binding to nuclear receptors, controlling the transcription of genes involved in cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis [29,30,31,32]. This regulation is vital for maintaining epithelial tissues such as the skin, respiratory tract, and gastrointestinal lining [33,34]. Additionally, vitamin A enhances immune function, supporting T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells, while maintaining mucosal barriers [35] (Figure 2).
Vitamin A absorption begins in the intestine, where dietary retinyl esters are hydrolyzed to retinol [10]. Retinol is absorbed by enterocytes, re-esterified, and transported to the liver [37]. In the liver, retinol is stored as retinyl esters and mobilized when needed [38].
The accurate measurement and utilization of different forms of vitamin A are crucial for proper dosages in commercial products. The units of measurement for vitamin A are as follows:
  • 1 IU of vitamin A is equivalent to
    0.3 μg of retinol (vitamin A alcohol);
    0.344 μg of retinyl acetate (vitamin A acetate);
    0.359 μg of retinyl propionate (vitamin A propionate);
    0.55 μg of retinyl palmitate (vitamin A palmitate).

2.2. Vitamin E

Vitamin E encompasses eight related compounds, including four tocopherols and four tocotrienols, with α-tocopherol being the most biologically active and abundant in animal tissues (Figure 3). Vitamin E is renowned for its antioxidant properties, protecting cell membranes from oxidative damage [39]. It donates a hydrogen atom to free radicals, neutralizing them and preventing lipid peroxidation within cellular membranes [40]. This antioxidant capability is crucial for maintaining cell membrane integrity, especially in oxygen-exposed tissues like the lungs, liver, muscle, and red blood cells [41].
Vitamin E also influences gene expression and immune function by modulating enzymes involved in cell signaling and regulating genes related to antioxidant defense, inflammation, and cell cycle regulation [42,43,44,45]. For example, vitamin E can inhibit protein kinase C, a kinase involved in cell proliferation and differentiation, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects [46].
The absorption of vitamin E occurs in the small intestine, where it is incorporated into chylomicrons and transported via the lymphatic system to the bloodstream [47]. Like vitamin A, vitamin E is stored in adipose tissue and the liver.
The standardized units for measuring vitamin E are as follows:
  • 1 mg of DL-alpha-tocopheryl acetate is equivalent to 1.0 IU of vitamin E;
  • 1 mg of D-alpha-tocopheryl acetate is equivalent to 1.36 IU of vitamin E.

2.3. Interplay between Vitamins A and E

Vitamins A and E interact synergistically to maintain cellular health. For instance, α-tocopherol enhances the antioxidant efficacy of all-trans-retinol by reducing its autooxidation, providing synergistic protection against peroxidative stress [48,49]. Additionally, vitamin E spares vitamin A by protecting it from oxidation, increasing its intestinal absorption, and enhancing its storage [50]. Studies have shown that animals fed vitamin E had a tenfold higher liver vitamin A content than those without supplementation [51]. However, excessive intake of either vitamin can negatively influence the storage levels of the other [26].

2.4. Nutritional Requirements in Different Animal Species

The nutritional needs of vitamins A and E vary among species due to differences in digestive systems, gut microbiota, dietary composition, and physiological needs [10,13,14,52]. Factors such as age, health status, and overall nutritional status also affect these requirements.
Ruminants: Ruminants, like cattle, have complex digestive systems that may lead to potential vitamin A and E loss or degradation [53,54]. While ruminants can convert β-carotene from forage into vitamin A, supplementation with retinyl acetate and DL-α-tocopheryl acetate is often necessary to meet their requirements [14,55,56]. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) provide “Adequate Intake” levels for these vitamins based on the available research (Table 1 and Table 2) [17,57,58,59]. Furthermore, other scientific organizations, including the German Society of Nutrition Physiology (GfE), the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (MOA), and the Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB), also offer foundational guidelines for formulating ruminant feed [60,61,62,63].
Monogastrics: In monogastric animals like poultry, swine, and companion animals, vitamins A and E are standard dietary supplements. Carnivores like dogs and cats require animal-derived retinoids due to their limited ability to convert β-carotene to retinal [64,65,66,67,68]. Poultry and swine also require supplementation due to their inefficient conversion rates of ß-carotene and the variability of ß-carotene levels in their diet [69,70]. Optimal vitamin A and E supply recommendations are presented in Table 3.

3. Consequences of Deficiencies in Vitamins A and E

Deficiencies in vitamins A and E have profound and overlapping impacts on health in animals, as these vitamins are crucial for various physiological functions, including vision, immune function, growth, reproduction, and protection against oxidative damage.
Ocular Health: Vitamin A is essential for vision, primarily due to its role in rhodopsin, a pigment necessary for low-light vision. In cattle, a deficiency of vitamin A commonly results in night blindness and xerophthalmia [15]. Similarly, in poultry, vitamin A deficiency can cause conjunctivitis, corneal ulcers, and excessive tearing, potentially progressing in severe cases to blindness [14,84,85,86]. In pigs, a lack of vitamin A may lead to visual impairment and, in extreme cases, complete blindness [10]. In felines and canines, deficiency symptoms include night blindness, reduced vision in dim light, conjunctivitis, dry eye with inflammation, corneal neovascularization, light sensitivity, dilated pupils in normal lighting, delayed pupillary light reflex, progressive retinal degeneration, cataract formation, and, potentially in severe cases, blindness [67,87,88]. Vitamin E, with its antioxidant properties, helps protect ocular tissues from oxidative damage.
Immune System: Vitamin A plays a crucial role in maintaining mucosal barriers and supporting the differentiation of immune cells [2]. In cattle, vitamin A deficiency is associated with increased susceptibility to infections, particularly respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, due to compromised immune function [15]. In swine, deficiencies in both vitamins A and E weaken immune responses, leading to increased vulnerability to infections [3,10]. Similarly, in poultry, deficiencies in these vitamins compromise the integrity and function of various immune cells, reducing their ability to combat infections [3,9,14]. For carnivorous companion animals such as dogs and cats, deficiencies in vitamins A and E lead to impaired immune function and a higher predisposition to infections [67].
Growth and Development: Sufficient levels of vitamins A and E are crucial for proper growth and development. In growing cattle, vitamin A deficiency is linked to stunted growth and skeletal abnormalities [15]. In poultry, deficiencies in both vitamins impair neuromuscular development, leading to conditions such as ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, and white muscle disease [3,14]. In swine, a lack of vitamin A negatively impacts growth and development, while insufficient vitamin E reduces growth performance [10,89,90,91].
Reproductive Health: Both vitamins are essential for reproductive health. In dairy cattle, vitamin A deficiency can result in a reduced sperm count and motility in males, as well as impaired ovarian function and embryonic development in females, potentially leading to infertility and complications during pregnancy [15,92,93]. Vitamin E supports reproductive health in sows, where deficiencies can cause reproductive failure and increased neonatal mortality [3,94]. Historically, vitamin E has been referred to as the “anti-sterility vitamin” due to its significant role in reproduction [95] (Table 4).
In domestic fowl, inadequate vitamin A levels can decrease egg production, lower hatchability rates, and increase embryonic mortality [14,96]. Reproductive complications, such as infertility or dystocia, can also occur due to deficiencies in these vitamins in dogs and cats [67,97].
Combined Impact: Deficiencies in both vitamins, A and E can have a synergistic detrimental effect. Together, they significantly impair immune function, growth, development, and reproductive health. Both vitamins, or their derivatives, either act as antioxidants or stimulate the production of antioxidative enzymes; thus, their combined deficiency increases oxidative stress, leading to cellular damage and a heightened risk of chronic diseases [98,99,100].

4. Liquid Vitamin A and E Supplements

Liquid vitamin supplements have gained considerable attention due to their enhanced bioavailability and ease of administration compared to traditional dry forms [101,102]. Vitamins A and E, essential for numerous physiological functions, are commonly formulated into liquid supplements to address or treat specific dietary deficiencies and promote overall health during stress periods in animals [103].
According to the EFSA [104], in the preparation of liquid formulations, retinyl esters that already include antioxidants/stabilizers are uniformly combined with a stabilizer and, optionally, with a liquid feed grade carrier to regulate the concentration of the active substance. For instance, liquid (oily) formulations of vitamin A such as acetate, palmitate, and propionate may have a concentration of 0.25 to 2.5 million IU per gram, and may contain carriers (e.g., plant oil 3–60%) and antioxidants (e.g., butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), butylhydroxyanisole (BHA), DL-alpha-tocopherol, and ascorbyl palmitate, 1–25%).

4.1. Stability and Formulation Strategies

A significant challenge associated with vitamin A is its susceptibility to degradation. Factors such as humidity, oxygen, heat, light, and heavy metals can compromise its stability [105]. To mitigate this issue, many vitamin A formulations incorporate antioxidants [104]. However, research has shown that employing a dry inert gas to prevent exposure to oxygen and moisture can maintain the stability of pure retinyl palmitate and retinyl propionate, regardless of the presence of an antioxidant [11]. In contrast, DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, commonly used in liquid vitamin preparations, stands out due to its resistance to oxidation, unlike α-tocopherol and vitamin A esters, making it one of the stable vitamins [106].
Liquid vitamin A supplements for veterinary use are commonly formulated as retinyl palmitate or retinyl propionate, both of which are esterified forms of retinol. These formulations are preferred for their stability and bioavailability [107]. Retinyl palmitate and retinyl propionate are often favored over retinyl acetate due to their greater stability in solution, especially at higher temperatures [108]. In fact, retinyl acetate is rarely used in liquid formulations because it tends to crystallize out of oily solutions and is more difficult to solubilize compared to retinyl palmitate and retinyl propionate [11].
The solubilization of fat-soluble vitamins often involves creating micelles using non-ionic surfactants, known as solubilizers, composed of lipophilic and hydrophilic components [109]. These micelles trap molecules like vitamin A and E, making them imperceptible if not overloaded. However, as they grow larger, the solution may appear opalescent [11].
In practice, solubilization requires heating the mixture of vitamin and solubilizer with an antioxidant in the absence of water [110]. Water should only be added once the mixture reaches 60–70 °C, or vice versa, while stirring vigorously. Deviating from this process often results in turbid or opalescent solutions [11].

4.2. Liquid Formulations of Vitamins A and E

Various liquid forms of vitamins A and E or their combination with other vitamins are currently available:
  • Oil-based solutions: Oil-based formulations often use vegetable oils, such as sunflower oil, as carriers for vitamins [111,112]. These formulations may also incorporate hydrophobic solvents like short-chain saturated triglycerides, ethyl stearate, or liquid paraffin [11]. A high-quality oil, especially one rich in α-tocopherol, can enhance the stability of vitamin A by protecting it from oxidation and improving its absorption in the gastrointestinal tract [113]. To further stabilize these formulations, compounds like BHT are frequently added, particularly in products containing retinyl propionate or retinyl palmitate [114]. It is important to note that vitamin A tends to be more stable in oily solutions compared to aqueous ones [11]. In these oil-based products, vitamin E acetate can be included either in its undiluted form or mixed with oils.
  • Emulsions: Emulsions are a versatile and widely used drug formulation designed to enhance the solubility and bioavailability of vitamins, particularly for lipophilic vitamins such as A and E. These formulations are especially beneficial in aqueous environments where solubility can be challenging. The effectiveness of emulsions is often due to the creation of transparent microemulsions, which significantly improve the solubility and stability of these vitamins [110,115].
    These emulsions are particularly advantageous for species with less efficient fat digestion or in scenarios where rapid vitamin absorption is required. For instance, a standard emulsion product may contain 50,000 IU/mL of vitamin A, emulsified with lecithin and polysorbate 80 [11]. This combination creates a stable and homogeneous mixture, which ensures effective delivery and absorption of the vitamin. Polysorbate 80, a non-ionic solubilizer commonly used in both oral and topical pharmaceuticals, has hydrophobic and hydrophilic components. The primary hydrophobic part in polysorbate 80 is polyethylene glycol-20 sorbitan oleate, which plays a crucial role in the solubilization process [116].
    Another example of an emulsion is a vitamin A/D/E preparation for injection, which includes 23.0 g of retinyl propionate, 0.2 g of cholecalciferol, 5.5 g of DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, 15.0 g of PEG-15 hydroxystearate (as a solubilizer), 0.5 g of butylated hydroxytoluene, 1.0 g of benzyl alcohol, and water to make up 100 mL [11].
    A specialized type of emulsion is the microemulsion, where retinyl esters, for example, are emulsified in an aqueous solution containing substances such as gelatin and sugar [104]. Microemulsions consist of droplets of the oily phase, approximately 1 μm in diameter, and remain stable within a temperature range of 50–60 °C [115]. Additionally, various types of fat-soluble vitamin emulsions can be formulated, including oil-in-water, water-in-oil, and oil-in-water-in-oil emulsions, offering a range of options depending on the desired application [117].
  • Aqueous Solutions: To effectively produce aqueous solutions of lipophilic vitamins such as A, D, E, and K, the use of solubilizers is essential. Key solubilizers include Polysorbate 80, PEG glyceryl trihydroxystearate, PEG glyceryl triricinoleate, and PEG hydroxystearate, all of which are known to form micelles that encapsulate these lipophilic vitamins, thereby facilitating their dissolution in water [11]. The quantity of solubilizer required can vary considerably depending on the specific vitamin. For instance, the solubilizer needed for vitamin E acetate differs from that required for vitamin A.
    Specific formulations can be used to prepare clear aqueous solutions, as detailed by Buehler [11]. For example, to produce unstabilized vitamin A drops (50,000 IU/mL), the formulation may include 3.0 g of retinyl palmitate, 10.0 g of PEG 40 glyceryl trihydroxystearate, 5.0 g of polyethylene glycol 400, and 100 mL of water. A vitamin E acetate solution (20 mg/mL) might consist of 2.0 g of DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, 8.0 g of polysorbate 80, and 100 mL of water. Additionally, a formulation for combined vitamin A and E drops (825,000 IU + 50 mg per ml, respectively) could use 1.50 g of retinyl palmitate, 5.0 g of DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, and 20.0 g of PEG 40 glyceryl trihydroxystearate, along with an appropriate amount of antioxidant, preservative, and flavoring, all dissolved in 100 mL of water. It is important to note that when using solubilizers, the effectiveness of preservatives must be carefully evaluated, as solubilizers can potentially diminish their efficacy.

5. Comparative Bioavailability

The method of administering vitamin A significantly influences its biological availability in animals. For example, injecting retinyl propionate directly into the bloodstream achieves a bioavailability rate of 100%. In contrast, other methods such as intramuscular (i.m.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) injections and oral supplementation via feed or water exhibit lower bioavailability [118]. The direct bloodstream injection of retinyl esters avoids the barriers and tissues encountered with other administration routes, resulting in quicker and more complete utilization [10]. In s.c. or i.m. injections, retinyl esters must diffuse through cellular barriers and blood vessels to enter systemic circulation. When administered orally, vitamin A must pass through the digestive system, where retinyl esters are broken down by digestive enzymes, absorbed across the intestinal wall, and metabolized in the liver before reaching systemic circulation [37]. This multistep process can lead to a lower biological value for orally supplied retinyl esters compared to injection methods [10]. The same rules apply for DL-α-tocopheryl acetate. Generally, i.m. injections have a quicker onset of action than s.c. injections due to the higher vascularity and blood flow in muscle tissue [119]. However, s.c. injections may provide a more prolonged duration of action because the active substance is absorbed and released more gradually from subcutaneous tissue [120]. It is also important to consider that different retinyl esters may have unique absorption characteristics depending on their specific properties, such as molecular weight and stability, as well as the injection site [10].
Brief and Chew [121] carried out an experiment with gilts that received either vitamin A supplementation through their diet or vitamin A propionate injections for four weeks prior to farrowing. The results showed that the injected gilts experienced reduced embryonic mortality and yielded a higher number of heavier piglets per litter compared to those that received dietary supplementation or were vitamin A deficient. This indicates that injectable vitamin A supplementation shows a higher biological value than dietary supplementation for enhancing reproductive outcomes in gilts.
Evaluating the bioavailability, or the degree to which a substance can be absorbed and utilized by the body, is crucial for lipophilic vitamins [122]. The presence of various additives, such as solubilizers, solvents, and other additives, can significantly impact the bioavailability of these vitamins [11].
A study conducted on chickens demonstrated the effect of these auxiliaries on the bioavailability of vitamin A solutions administered through injection. Figure 4 illustrates the variation in vitamin A retention observed when different additives were used in the solutions.
Thus, the choice of administration method and formulation significantly impacts the bioavailability and efficacy of lipophilic vitamins like vitamins A and E. Careful consideration of factors such as the injection site, the molecular properties of the vitamin esters, and the presence of auxiliaries is crucial to optimize the delivery and utilization of these essential micronutrients.

6. Applications in Veterinary Medicine and Livestock Production

When rapid supplementation of vitamin A and E is needed, liquid forms are preferred because they can be quickly supplied via water or injection. In contrast, using dry forms through feed supplementation requires adjusting the premix formulation and involves a lengthy feed production and delivery process. Unlike dry forms, liquid forms stored on the farm can be applied immediately. This chapter explores the roles and benefits of liquid vitamin A and E in enhancing animal health and reproduction, improving production parameters, and preventing diseases in various livestock species.

6.1. Use of Injectable Forms for Enhancing Reproductive Performance

One major challenge to profitability in the pork industry is the reproductive efficiency of breeding sows [10]. Vitamin A supports the reproductive system and fetal development [92,93,94,95,96,97].
Coffey and Britt [123] showed that injecting retinyl palmitate into sows already on a diet with adequate vitamin A (11,000 IU/kg of feed) increased litter sizes. Their treatment involved intramuscular administration of 50,000 IU of vitamin A at weaning, mating, and 7 days after mating, resulting in more piglets being born alive and a greater litter weight, highlighting retinol’s role in embryonic development.
Silveira et al. [124] conducted a field trial with 1030 sows, injecting 450,000 IU of retinyl palmitate at weaning, mating, and 7 days after mating. This treatment improved reproductive performance, increasing the number of live-born piglets and litter weight, leading to a recommendation of 500,000 IU of retinyl palmitate at weaning or 5 days before gilts’ expected heat.
Lindemann et al. [20] confirmed these findings, showing that injections of 250,000 IU or 500,000 IU of vitamin A at weaning and breeding in sows already on adequate diets consistently increased the litter size and weight. They concluded that vitamin A positively affects oocyte maturation, ovulation, fertilization, and early embryonic survival and development.
Whaley et al. [125] administered 1,000,000 IU of retinyl palmitate on day 15 after the second estrus to gilts on high-energy diets. This altered oocyte and embryo development, suggesting vitamin A influences embryonic development by advancing meiosis resumption. While many studies indicate vitamin A enhances sow reproductive performance, some report no effect, underlining the need for further research [126,127].
Similarly to vitamin A, vitamin E, also known as the anti-sterility vitamin, can effectively enhance reproductive performance. Pontes et al. [22] investigated the impact of injectable vitamin E administered during the last three weeks prepartum on retained fetal membranes (RFMs) and overall reproductive performance in dairy cows. In this study, 890 cows were randomly assigned to either a control group or a treatment group. The treatment group received three injections of 1000 IU of vitamin E before calving. The findings indicated that cows receiving vitamin E experienced a significant reduction in the incidence of RFMs, stillbirths, and levels of cortisol and non-esterified fatty acids around calving. Additionally, these cows had improved pregnancy rates compared to the control group. Notably, milk production was similar between the groups, but the treated cows demonstrated enhanced reproductive outcomes.
In another study, Mahmoud et al. [21] explored the effects of vitamin E and selenium injections on semen quality, testes measurements, and blood parameters in Ossimi rams. Fourteen rams were divided into control and treatment groups, with the treatment group receiving injections of 5 mg sodium selenite and 450 mg vitamin E twice weekly for a month. The treated rams exhibited significant improvements in semen quality and quantity, including increased ejaculate volume, mass motility, and sperm concentration, along with a reduction in dead and abnormal spermatozoa. Furthermore, the treated rams showed elevated serum testosterone levels and enhanced reproductive performance, underscoring the beneficial effects of vitamin E and selenium injections. Studies on female sheep have also demonstrated the positive impact of vitamin E injections on reproductive performance [25].

6.2. Use of Injectable Forms in Enhancing Animal Growth and Performance

Vitamin A is essential for the growth and development of animals. Retinoic acid signaling significantly influences myogenic differentiation in mammals [128]. According to Wang et al. [23], injecting vitamin A into cattle enhances their growth (Figure 5) by boosting the number of PAX7-positive satellite cells and increasing the expression of myogenic marker genes, such as PAX7, MYF5, MYOD, and MYOG. Consequently, early-stage treatment with retinyl palmitate results in larger muscle fiber sizes in vitamin A-treated cattle at harvest. The researchers emphasized the importance of carefully managing vitamin A levels in beef cattle to optimize growth performance.
Harris et al. [24] discovered that providing vitamin A through injection to newborn beef cattle, at doses of either 150,000 IU or 300,000 IU (as retinyl palmitate), both at birth and one month of age, led to increased weaning weights. This enhancement was attributed to improved muscle growth and augmented marbling fat production, as detailed in Table 5. Consequently, incorporating vitamin A supplementation into the early developmental stages could serve as a feasible strategy for beef cattle producers seeking to enhance marbling and optimize beef production efficiency.
Similar outcomes were reported in lambs, where 16 newborn lambs received weekly intramuscular injections of either corn oil (control group) or 7500 IU vitamin A palmitate (vitamin A group) from birth to 3 weeks of age [129]. At 3 weeks of age, muscle samples were taken to analyze the effects of vitamin A. All lambs were slaughtered at 8 months of age. The results suggest that vitamin A treatment accelerated the growth rate, increased the loin eye area (p < 0.05), and increased the diameter of myofibers in the longissimus thoracis muscle (p < 0.01). Additionally, vitamin A increased the final body weight of lambs (p < 0.05). A recent trial showed that retinoic acid promotes lamb muscle growth by inhibiting myoblast proliferation and promoting myogenic differentiation through class E basic helix-loop-helix protein (40BHLHE40), a transcriptional repressor, which inhibits the expression of DNA-binding inhibitor 3 (ID3) [130].
In contrast to the research on the effects of vitamin A injection, there is a paucity of studies investigating the administration of vitamin E in growing animals and its consequent impact on performance. Thus, there is a compelling need for further experimental exploration in this area to elucidate its potential benefits or limitations.

6.3. Incorporating Liquid Vitamin A and E into Veterinary Practices via Water Administration

Administering liquid forms of fat-soluble vitamins through water has been an effective strategy for enhancing livestock health and productivity for decades. Supplementing these vitamins via water, particularly during periods of stress or increased demand, helps livestock achieve optimal physiological functions, potentially improving growth rates, reproductive performance, and disease resistance [8,131]. During illness or stress, animals typically reduce their feed intake but continue to consume water, providing an opportunity to supply essential micronutrients [132]. This method ensures the uniform distribution and efficient uptake of vitamins.
Vitamin A, D3, and E supplementation via drinking water is commonly used to support animals during periods of high demand. Schmidt [19] conducted a trial on 41 sows around weaning, dividing them into two groups. The trial group received 10 mL of a vitamin A, D3, and E combination in their drinking water from one day before until two days after weaning. The results showed that vitamin supplementation significantly shortened the weaning-to-estrus interval, with almost 50% of the sows returning to estrus within four days post-weaning. This indicates the positive impact of vitamin supplementation on reproductive function.
Amazan et al. [133] investigated the impact of vitamin E (α-tocopherol) supplementation in drinking water on tocopherol transfer, antioxidant capacity, and immune response in sows and piglets. Piglets receiving vitamin E in their water, whose mothers were also supplemented, exhibited the highest serum α-tocopherol levels five days post-weaning. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) significantly improved with vitamin E supplementation (p = 0.037). However, there were no significant changes in immunoglobulin levels in piglet serum. These findings suggest that vitamin E supplementation through water enhances plasma antioxidant capacity, as demonstrated by the FRAP assay.

6.4. Usage of Liquid Vitamin A and E Drops in Veterinary Practice

Liquid drops containing vitamins A and E are widely utilized in veterinary medicine for a range of purposes, such as addressing deficiencies, enhancing overall well-being, and bolstering specific bodily functions, especially in companion animals [26]. The dosage and administration of these drops in veterinary practice typically hinge on factors like the animal’s age, weight, and particular health condition, with the veterinarian overseeing the process. It is crucial to adhere closely to the veterinarian’s guidelines and avoid surpassing the recommended dosage. These liquid drops can be seamlessly incorporated into the animal’s feed or administered directly into their mouth, offering added convenience for both pet owners and veterinarians, especially when dealing with animals that struggle with swallowing pills or capsules [134,135].
Liquid vitamin A drops can be utilized to treat various ailments. Silver [26] identifies several diseases in dogs and cats commonly associated with vitamin A deficiency, which can be alleviated or managed with retinoid supplements, including retinoid-responsive dermatoses, solar dermatosis of dogs and cats, xerophthalmia, squamous cell carcinoma, intestinal inflammation, keratoacanthoma, alopecia, delayed wound healing, sebaceous gland disorder, canine icthyosis, feline muzzle folliculitis, nyctalopia, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, squamos metaplasia, epitheliotrophic T cell lymphoma, respiratory infections, hyperkeratinization of the epithelial surfaces, seborrhea, haircoat problems, Schnauzer comedo syndrome, increased susceptibility to infection, exfoliation, sebaceous adenitis, and follicular dysplasia.
A recent study by Zhang et al. [136] demonstrated that supplementation with an oil-based oral vitamin A solution, at a calculated dosage of 8000 IU per kg of diet, enhanced the immune response in White Leghorn chickens infected with infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). The chickens received daily vitamin A supplementation until they were 21 days old, after which they were infected with a pathogenic IBV strain. The results showed that vitamin A supplementation reduced viral replication and increased serum IgG levels, while also mitigating the inflammatory response. Although the clinical course of the disease and the growth performance of the chickens were not significantly affected, these findings underscore the essential role of vitamin A in modulating chicken–IBV interactions and supporting innate immunity.
The evidence suggests that vitamin E possesses anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties [137,138]. In a study using a canine model of osteoarthritis, two groups of dogs were evaluated: one group received a placebo (n = 8), while the other group received 400 IU of liquid DL-α-tocopheryl acetate daily (n = 7) [139]. After 56 days, synovial fluid analysis revealed significantly lower concentrations of prostaglandin E2 and nitrogen oxides in the vitamin E-supplemented group. Assessments of pain and inflammation demonstrated lower scores in the vitamin E group, with significant reductions in visual analog scale scores by day 55 and in electronic von Frey scores by day 28. This study is the first to show that high-dose vitamin E supplementation can reduce inflammation and pain markers in dogs with osteoarthritis.

6.5. Regulatory Guidance

When using commercial forms of vitamins A and E in animal production, it is essential to comply with local regulatory requirements and usage conditions. The safe and appropriate application of vitamin A in particular necessitates adherence to specific guidelines. These guidelines limit vitamin A supplementation to the recommended intake levels set by authoritative bodies, such as the European Commission in the European Union, based on scientific opinions from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Therefore, any use of vitamin A in animal nutrition must conform strictly to the regulatory framework to avoid excessive supplementation and potential adverse effects on animal health and welfare.
For instance, in the European Union, vitamin A used in water must follow specific guidelines. The combined concentration of vitamin A in water and feed must not exceed the recommended intake levels for particular species or categories [104]. These intake levels are determined by the maximum content of vitamin A authorized for use in feed. However, since feed additive legislation is periodically adjusted, it is advisable to constantly check for local updates and possible changes in the allowed applications. Notably, the occurrence of hypervitaminosis A in animals is highly improbable and has not been reported in practical farming or husbandry scenarios, thanks to the stringent regulation of vitamin A levels in animal feed [140]. The EFSA FEEDAP Panel has determined that the current practical levels of vitamin E used in animal production are safe for all animal species. The data on hypervitaminosis E are not consistent enough to establish a maximum safe content for vitamin E in feedstuffs based on animal safety [141].

7. Challenges in Applying Liquid Formulations across Animal Species

Administering liquid vitamins A and E to livestock and pets presents several challenges across different species. These challenges primarily involve ensuring consistent intake and maintaining vitamin stability.

7.1. Cattle

One major challenge with cattle is ensuring the uniform distribution of liquid vitamins. In large herds, individual animals may consume varying amounts of water or feed, leading to inconsistent vitamin intake [142]. This variability can affect the overall effectiveness of supplementation, particularly when vitamins are added to drinking water or mixed feeds. Even if vitamin E acetate is stable, supplementing liquid vitamin A via feed poses challenges due to its instability and susceptibility to oxidation, leading to significant degradation and loss of efficacy [143]. Furthermore, interactions with other feed components and inconsistent distribution can undermine the effectiveness of the supplementation. Supplementing vitamin A via water is preferred, as it allows for the use of specially stabilized formulations designed to maintain the vitamin’s potency [2].
A more precise and dependable method for vitamin supplementation is through injectable administration [144]. This approach allows for the accurate dosing of vitamins to individual animals, ensuring that each receives the exact amount required. However, injectable supplementation tends to be more labor-intensive and can cause greater stress to the animals compared to other methods [145]. It often necessitates the presence of a veterinarian or an animal health professional, which can increase both the complexity and cost of the supplementation process.

7.2. Swine

The accurate dosing of liquid vitamins through dry or liquid feed can be particularly challenging in automated feeding systems for swine, where precise measurement is crucial to prevent over- or under-supplementation. These systems must ensure that the correct amount of vitamins is evenly distributed, which can be difficult due to variations in feed consumption among individual animals [146]. An alternative method is to administer vitamins through drinking water. However, similar to the challenges observed in cattle, this approach can lead to inconsistent vitamin intake because individual animals may consume different amounts of water.
In contrast, injection supplementation offers a more controlled method for administering vitamins. This technique allows for precise dosing, ensuring that each animal receives the exact amount of vitamins needed [144]. By targeting individual animals, injections eliminate variability in intake and guarantee that each animal gets the specified dosage, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the supplementation.

7.3. Poultry

In domestic fowl, liquid vitamin supplements are typically administered through drinking water to facilitate consistent intake across the flock. A significant challenge with this method is ensuring that all birds receive an adequate amount of the vitamins, particularly in large flocks. Variability in individual water consumption can lead to uneven distribution of the micronutrients. Additionally, the stability of liquid vitamins in water can be influenced by factors such as water temperature and pH, necessitating adjustments in both the formulation of the supplements and the administration practices [147].
Injection methods are generally impractical for large flocks due to their labor-intensive nature and time constraints [2]. However, they are occasionally employed for larger fowl, such as ostriches, or for high-value birds within breeding flocks, where precise dosing and targeted supplementation are critical.

7.4. Pets

For pets, the primary challenge in administering liquid vitamins is ensuring their acceptance and consumption. Pets can be sensitive to changes in taste or smell, which may lead to reluctance in consuming the supplement when added to their feed or water [148]. Additionally, achieving the correct dosage can be difficult if the pet is particular about flavors or if the liquid formulation is unappealing.
To address these challenges, one effective approach is to consult with a veterinarian. A veterinarian can provide precise dosing through oral administration techniques or, if necessary, by injection [149]. This method ensures that the pet receives the correct amount of the supplement and may improve adherence to the prescribed regimen. Consistent administration, whether at home or through veterinary guidance, is crucial for realizing the intended health benefits of the vitamin supplements.
Thus, the effective administration of liquid vitamins A and E to livestock and pets presents notable challenges, including ensuring a consistent intake, maintaining vitamin stability, and managing the logistics of supplementation. While injectable methods offer precise dosing and mitigate intake variability, they often involve a higher labor and cost, underscoring the need for careful consideration of each method’s practicality and effectiveness.

8. Perspectives and Future Directions

Liquid forms of vitamins A and E have attracted significant interest in veterinary practice due to their potential benefits and ease of use. These essential micronutrients play crucial roles in animal health, including functions such as vision, immune response, reproductive health, and overall well-being. In the veterinary community, the use of liquid vitamin supplements is common, serving both preventive and therapeutic purposes [11].
Deficiencies in vitamins A and E can lead to various health problems in animals, from stunted growth and reproductive issues to compromised immune function [2,33,84,89]. Liquid formulations provide a convenient and effective way to address these deficiencies, especially when oral supplementation through water or parenteral administration is preferred. Their improved bioavailability ensures optimal micronutrient utilization, speeding up recovery from deficiency disorders.
Despite the previously mentioned challenges in using liquid formulations for animals, one of the key advantages of liquid vitamin supplements remains their ease of administration compared to dry forms. Unlike solid forms, liquids are easier to give, particularly to animals that resist oral medication or have difficulty swallowing [134,135]. Liquid supplements allow for precise dosing and can be easily mixed into water or directly administered into the mouth, making them more palatable and increasing compliance among animals [150].
Furthermore, liquid vitamin A and E supplements offer versatility in their use, allowing for tailored treatment regimens to meet the specific needs of individual animals. They can be used preventively to prevent deficiencies or therapeutically to address existing health issues, giving veterinarians flexibility in their treatment approach [103].
Looking ahead, the future of liquid vitamin A and E supplementation in veterinary practice holds promise for further improvement and innovation. Future research may focus on optimizing formulations to enhance stability, palatability, and bioavailability. This could involve developing new delivery systems or adding additives to improve the taste and texture, making supplements more appealing to animals [151].
Additionally, advances in veterinary medicine may lead to targeted therapies using liquid vitamin A and E supplements [136,152,153]. Tailored to specific animal species, breeds, or health conditions, these therapies could provide precise and effective treatment strategies, improving outcomes for animal patients.
Moreover, the growing field of nutrigenomics offers the potential for precision feeding in veterinary medicine for pets [67]. Future research may explore the interaction between genetic factors and vitamin requirements in animals, paving the way for targeted supplementation protocols based on individual genetic profiles.
As our understanding of the effects of liquid vitamin A and E supplements continues to evolve, there will be an increasing emphasis on evidence-based practice in veterinary medicine. Rigorous animal trials will be crucial to establish the efficacy and safety of these supplements, enabling veterinarians and animal health professionals to confidently incorporate them into standard treatment protocols.

9. Conclusions and Recommendations

This review highlights the essential role of liquid vitamin A and E supplements in veterinary and livestock production, emphasizing their advantages over traditional forms. The synergistic effects of these vitamins in maintaining cellular health and overall physiological well-being have been discussed, along with their benefits for ocular and immune system health, growth, and reproductive health.
Liquid supplements offer enhanced bioavailability and ease of administration. The bioavailability of vitamin A varies with administration methods, with direct bloodstream injection achieving the highest levels.
To advance the field of animal health and enhance livestock productivity and welfare, several key recommendations should be pursued. First, optimizing formulations of liquid vitamins A and E is crucial to improving their stability, palatability, and bioavailability for different animal species. This can ensure that the supplements are both effective and well received by the animals. Next, exploring targeted therapies by investigating individualized vitamin delivery approaches, based on genetic and individual animal profiles, could lead to more tailored and effective supplementation strategies. Additionally, conducting rigorous trials to establish the efficacy and safety of these liquid supplements is essential, adhering to evidence-based practices to ensure reliable results. Standardizing protocols for integrating liquid supplements into veterinary practices is also important, including considerations for dosages, administration routes, and potential drug interactions. By implementing these recommendations, we can enhance animal health, reproductive outcomes, growth, and overall well-being. Continued research and adherence to evidence-based practices will contribute to more effective management strategies and improved animal care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.; methodology, Y.S. and W.P.; software, Y.S.; validation, W.P.; formal analysis, W.P.; investigation, Y.S.; resources, Y.S. and W.P.; data curation, Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, W.P.; visualization, Y.S.; supervision, W.P.; project administration, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Both authors of this work are affiliated with BASF, a manufacturer of vitamins and carotenoids, such as vitamins A and E. Nevertheless, it is crucial to underscore that the content of this manuscript has been sourced exclusively from scientific peer-reviewed data. Our unwavering commitment lies in upholding transparency and adhering to ethical research principles.

Abbreviations

AKTSerine-threonine kinase B
ATRAAll-trans-retinoic acid
BHAButylhydroxyanisole
BHTButylhydroxytoluene
BWBody weight
DMDry matter
EFSAEuropean Food Safety Authority
EMAEuropean Medicines Agency
FEEDAPThe Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed
FRAPFerric Reducing Ability of Plasma
i.m.Intramuscular
IBVInfectious bronchitis virus
ID3DNA-binding inhibitor 3
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IUInternational Unit
KEAP1Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1
mTORMammalian Target for Rapamycin
MYF5Myogenic Factor 5 (a protein coding gene)
MYODMyoblast Determination Protein
MYOGMyogenin
NASEMThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
NFκBNuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NRF2Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2–related factor 2
PAX7 Paired Box 7 (a protein-coding gene)
PEGPolyethylene glycol
RFMRetained fetal membranes
s.c.Subcutaneous
UVUltraviolet
40BHLHE40Class E basic helix-loop-helix protein

References

  1. Mordor Intelligence. Feed Vitamins Market Size & Share Analysis-Growth Trends & Forecasts up to 2029. 2024. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-feed-vitamins-market-industry/market-size (accessed on 5 July 2024).
  2. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. The role of vitamin A in non-ruminant immunology. Front. Anim. Sci. 2023, 4, 1197802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shastak, Y.; Obermueller-Jevic, U.; Pelletier, W. A Century of Vitamin E: Early Milestones and Future Directions in Animal Nutrition. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mishra, P.; Paital, B.; Jena, S.; Swain, S.S.; Kumar, S.; Yadav, M.K.; Chainy, G.B.N.; Samanta, L. Possible activation of NRF2 by Vitamin E/Curcumin against altered thyroid hormone induced oxidative stress via NFĸB/AKT/mTOR/KEAP1 signalling in rat heart. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Subudhi, U.; Das, K.; Paital, B.; Bhanja, S.; Chainy, G.B. Supplementation of curcumin and vitamin E enhances oxidative stress, but restores hepatic histoarchitecture in hypothyroid rats. Life Sci. 2009, 84, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jin, L.; Yan, S.; Shi, B.; Bao, H.; Gong, J.; Guo, X.; Li, J. Effects of vitamin A on the milk performance, antioxidant functions and immune functions of dairy cows. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2014, 192, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, L.; Xu, X.; Su, G.; Shi, B.; Shan, A. High concentration of vitamin E supplementation in sow diet during the last week of gestation and lactation affects the immunological variables and antioxidative parameters in piglets. J. Dairy Res. 2017, 84, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Idamokoro, E.M.; Falowo, A.B.; Oyeagu, C.E.; Afolayan, A.J. Multifunctional activity of vitamin E in animal and animal products: A review. Anim. Sci. J. 2020, 91, e13352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Delving into Vitamin A Supplementation in Poultry Nutrition: Current Knowledge, Functional Effects, and Practical Implications. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2023, 79, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Vitamin A supply in swine production: A review of current science and practical considerations. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2023, 39, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buehler, V. Vademecum for Vitamin Formulations, 2nd ed.; Medpharm Gmbh Scientific Publisher: Bahnhofsweg, Germany, 2001; 144p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Duque, P.; Vieira, C.P.; Bastos, B.; Vieira, J. The evolution of vitamin C biosynthesis and transport in animals. BMC Ecol. Evol. 2022, 22, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. McDowell, L.R. Vitamin Nutrition of Livestock Animals: Overview from VitaminDiscovery to Today. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 86, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Nutritional Balance Matters: Assessing the Ramifications of Vitamin A Deficiency on Poultry Health and Productivity. Poultry 2023, 2, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Balancing Vitamin A Supply for Cattle: A Review of the Current Knowledge. In Advances in Animal Science and Zoology 21; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2023; Chapter 2; Available online: https://novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Advances-in-Animal-Science-and-Zoology.-Volume-21-Chapter-2.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2023).
  16. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W.; Kuntz, A. Insights into Analytical Precision: Understanding the Factors Influencing Accurate Vitamin A Determination in Various Samples. Analytica 2024, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  18. Baker, D.H. Bioavailability of minerals and vitamins. In Swine Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Lewisand, A.J., Southern, L.L., Eds.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 357–379. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmidt, M. Quick Nutritional Support through Drinking Water. 2019. Available online: https://www.pig333.com/articles/quick-nutritional-support-through-drinking-water_15166/ (accessed on 5 June 2024).
  20. Lindemann, M.D.; Brendemuhl, J.H.; Chiba, L.I.; Darroch, C.S.; Dove, C.R.; Estienne, M.J.; Harper, A.F. A regional evaluation of injections of high levels of vitamin A on reproductive performance of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mahmoud, G.B.; Abdel-Raheem, S.M.; Hussein, H.A. Effect of combination of vitamin E and selenium injections on reproductive performance and blood parameters of Ossimi rams. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 113, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pontes, G.C.; Monteiro, P.L., Jr.; Prata, A.B.; Guardieiro, M.M.; Pinto, D.A.; Fernandes, G.O.; Wiltbank, M.C.; Santos, J.E.; Sartori, R. Effect of injectable vitamin E on incidence of retained fetal membranes and reproductive performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 2437–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, B.; Nie, W.; Fu, X.; de Avila, J.M.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, M.J.; Maquivar, M.; Parish, S.M.; Busboom, J.R.; Nelson, M.L.; et al. Neonatal vitamin A injection promotes cattle muscle growth and increases oxidative muscle fibers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harris, C.L.; Wang, B.; Deavila, J.M.; Busboom, J.R.; Maquivar, M.; Parish, S.M.; McCann, B.; Nelson, M.L.; Du, M. Vitamin A administration at birth promotes calf growth and intramuscular fat development in Angus beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Awawdeh, M.S.; Eljarah, A.H.; Ababneh, M.M. Multiple injections of vitamin E and selenium improved the reproductive performance of estrus-synchronized Awassi ewes. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1421–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silver, R.J. Liquid A Drops. Technical Report for Veterinarian Use Only. VBS Direct Ltd. 1 Mill View Close, Bulkeley, Cheshire, SY14 8DB. 2024. Available online: https://vbsdirect.co.uk/files/Vitamin_A_Tech_Report2.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2024).
  27. Carazo, A.; Macáková, K.; Matoušová, K.; Krčmová, L.K.; Protti, M.; Mladěnka, P. Vitamin A update: Forms, sources, kinetics, detection, function, deficiency, therapeutic use and toxicity. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kono, M.; Goletz, P.W.; Crouch, R.K. 11-cis- and all-trans-retinols can activate rod opsin: Rational design of the visual cycle. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 7567–7571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gaetano, C.; Catalano, A.; Illi, B.; Felici, A.; Minucci, S.; Palumbo, R.; Facchiano, F.; Mangoni, A.; Mancarella, S.; Mühlhauser, J.; et al. Retinoids induce fibroblast growth factor-2 production in endothelial cells via retinoic acid receptor alpha activation and stimulate angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Circ. Res. 2001, 88, E38–E47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cui, J.; Gong, M.; He, Y.; Li, Q.; He, T.; Bi, Y. All-trans retinoic acid inhibits proliferation, migration, invasion and induces differentiation of hepa1-6 cells through reversing EMT in vitro. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Brandebourg, T.D.; Hu, C.Y. Regulation of differentiating pig preadipocytes by retinoic acid. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Qiu, J.; Nordling, S.; Vasavada, H.H.; Butcher, E.C.; Hirschi, K.K. Retinoic Acid Promotes Endothelial Cell Cycle Early G1 State to Enable Human Hemogenic Endothelial Cell Specification. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cortes, P.L.; Tiwary, A.K.; Puschner, B.; Crespo, R.M.; Chin, R.P.; Bland, M.; Shivaprasad, H.L. Vitamin A deficiency in turkey poults. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2006, 18, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qi, G.; Brand, D.; Zheng, S.G. Role of Vitamin A in the Immune System. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oliveira, L.M.; Teixeira, F.M.E.; Sato, M.N. Impact of retinoic acid on immune cells and inflammatory diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 3067126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bono, M.R.; Tejon, G.; Flores-Santibañez, F.; Fernandez, D.; Rosemblatt, M.; Sauma, D. Retinoic Acid as a Modulator of T Cell Immunity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Harrison, E.H. Mechanisms involved in the intestinal absorption of dietary vitamin A and provitamin A carotenoids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1821, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Senoo, H.; Imai, K.; Mezaki, Y.; Miura, M.; Morii, M.; Fujiwara, M.; Blomhoff, R. Accumulation of vitamin A in the hepatic stellate cell of arctic top predators. Anat. Rec. 2012, 295, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dogru Pekiner, B. Vitamin E as an antioxidant. J. Fac. Pharm. Ank. 2003, 32, 243–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ehizuelen Ebhohimen, I.; Stephen Okanlawon, T.; Ododo Osagie, A.; Norma Izevbigie, O. Vitamin E in Human Health and Oxidative Stress Related Diseases; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Traber, M.G.; Atkinson, J. Vitamin E, antioxidant and nothing more. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fischer, A.; Pallauf, J.; Gohil, K.; Weber, S.U.; Packer, L.; Rimbach, G. Effect of selenium and vitamin E deficiency on differential gene expression in rat liver. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 285, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rimbach, G.; Minihane, A.M.; Majewicz, J.; Fischer, A.; Pallauf, J.; Virgli, F.; Weinberg, P.D. Regulation of cell signalling by vitamin E. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2002, 61, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Azzi, A.; Gysin, R.; Kempná, P.; Munteanu, A.; Negis, Y.; Villacorta, L.; Visarius, T.; Zingg, J.M. Vitamin E mediates cell signaling and regulation of gene expression. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 2004, 1031, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zingg, J.M. Vitamin E: A Role in Signal Transduction. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015, 35, 135–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ciarcià, G.; Bianchi, S.; Tomasello, B.; Acquaviva, R.; Malfa, G.A.; Naletova, I.; La Mantia, A.; Di Giacomo, C. Vitamin E and Non-Communicable Diseases: A Review. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hynd, P.I. (Ed.) Digestion in the mono-gastric animal. In Animal Nutrition: From Theory to Practice; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton South, Australia, 2019; pp. 42–63. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tesoriere, L.; Bongiorno, A.; Pintaudi, A.M.; D’Anna, R.; D’Arpa, D.; Livrea, M.A. Synergistic interactions between vitamin A and vitamin E against lipid peroxidation in phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 326, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tesoriere, L.; Ciaccio, M.; Bongiorno, A.; Riccio, A.; Pintaudi, A.M.; Livrea, M.A. antioxidant activity of all-trans-retinol in homogeneous solution and in phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 307, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guilland, J.-C. Les interactions entre les vitamines A, D, E et K: Synergie et/ou competition. OCL 2011, 18, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moore, T. The effect of vitamin E deficiency on vitamin A reserves of the rat. Biochem. J. 1940, 34, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Z.-L.; Pang, S.-J.; Zhang, K.-W.; Li, P.-Y.; Li, P.-G.; Yang, C. Dietary vitamin A modifies the gut microbiota and intestinal tissue transcriptome, impacting intestinal permeability and the release of inflammatory factors, thereby influencing Aβ pathology. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1367086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Castillo-Gonzalez, A.R.; Burrola-Barraza, M.E.; Dominguez-Viveros, J.; Chavez-Martinez, A. Rumen microorganisms and fermentation. Arch. Med. Vet. 2014, 46, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mitchell, G.E., Jr.; Little, C.O.; Hayes, B.W. Pre-intestinal destruction of vitamin A by ruminants fed nitrate. J. Anim. Sci. 1967, 26, 827–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Salinas-Chavira, J.; Arrizon, A.A.; Barreras, A.; Chen, C.Z.; Plascencia, A.; Zinn, R.A. Evaluation of supplemental vitamin A and E on 56-day growth performance, dietary net energy, and plasma retinol and tocopherol concentrations in Holstein steer calves. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2014, 30, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. A cross-species perspective: β-carotene supplementation effects in poultry, swine, and cattle—A review. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2024, 52, 2321957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  58. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle; National Academic Science: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  59. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  60. GfE (German Society of Nutrition Physiology). Recommended Energy and Nutrient Supply for Dairy Cows and Growing Cattle, 8th ed.; GfE: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  61. INRA (National Institute of Agricultural Research). INRA Feeding System for Ruminants; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  62. MOA (Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China). Feeding Standard of Beef Cattle (NY/T 815-2004); Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  63. CVB Table Booklet Feeding of Ruminants. Nutrient Requirements for Cattle, Sheep and Goats and Nutritional Values of Feeding Ingredients for Ruminants; CVB-series no 66; Stichting CVB: Lelystad, the Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  64. McDowell, L.R. Vitamin Supplementation. In Vitamins in Animal Nutrition: Comparative Aspects to Human Nutrition; McDowell, L.R., Ed.; Academic Press Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1989; pp. 422–431. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kırkpınar, F.; Açıkgöz, Z. Feeding. In Animal Husbandry and Nutrition; Yücel, B., Taşkin, T., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 97–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Green, A.S.; Tang, G.; Lango, J.; Klasing, K.C.; Fascetti, A.J. Domestic cats convert [2H8]-β-carotene to [2H4]-retinol following a single oral dose. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Pet Wellness and Vitamin A: A Narrative Overview. Animals 2024, 14, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chew, B.P.; Park, J.S. Carotenoid action on the immune response. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 257S–261S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brush, A.H. Metabolism of carotenoid pigments in birds. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 2969–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Green, A.S.; Fascetti, A.J. Meeting the Vitamin A Requirement: The Efficacy and Importance of β-Carotene in Animal Species. Sci. World J. 2016, 2016, 7393620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cobb 500 Broiler Performance & Nutrition Supplement. 2022. Available online: https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/Cobb-Files/product-guides/5502e86566/2022-Cobb500-Broiler-Performance-Nutrition-Supplement.pdf (accessed on 26 July 2023).
  72. ROSS Broiler (Aviagen): Nutrition Specifications. 2022. Available online: https://aviagen.com/eu/brands/ross/products/ross-308 (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  73. Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Layers. 2020. Available online: https://www.hyline.com/filesimages/Hy-Line-Products/Hy-Line-Product-PDFs/W-36/36%20COM%20ENG.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2023).
  74. Lohmann LSL-Lite Management Guide. 2014. Available online: https://lohmann-breeders.com/media/strains/cage/management/LOHMANN-LSL-Lite-Cage-1.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2016).
  75. Hybrid Turkeys Vitamin and Trace Mineral Supplementation. 2016. Available online: https://www.hybridturkeys.com/en/resources/commercial-management/feed-and-water/vitamin-and-trace-mineral-supplementation/ (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  76. Nicholas, B.U.T. Heavy Lines Feeding Guidelines. 2015. Available online: https://www.aviagenturkeys.com/uploads/2015/11/20/NU06%20Feeding%20Guidelines%20for%20Nicholas%20&%20BUT%20Heavy%20Lines%20EN.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  77. ROSS Parent Stock. 2016. Nutrition Specifications. Available online: http://www.garantitavukculuk.com/doc/Ross308-PS-NS-EN[82].pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  78. Cobb. 2020. Breeder Management. Accessed Supplement. Available online: https://cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/Cobb500-Fast-Feather-Breeder-Management-Supplement.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  79. PIC. 2016. PIC Nutrient Specification Manual. Available online: https://www.pic.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/10/Nutrient-Specifications-Manual_2016_English_Metric.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  80. BHZP. 2016. Bundes Hybrid Zucht Programm, Dahlenburg-Ellringen, Germany. Available online: https://www.bhzp.de/en/ (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  81. Topigs Norsvin. 2016. Rearing Gilts and Sows. Manual Topigs 20. Available online: https://topigsnorsvin.com/tn-content/uploads/2020/02/Feeding-Manual-Norsvin-Duroc.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2024).
  82. Hypor (A Hendrix Genetics Company). 2017. Wean to Finish Feeding Guide Hypor Maxter. Available online: https://www.hypor.com/en/resources/management-guides/ (accessed on 14 May 2019).
  83. AWT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Wirkstoffe in der Tierernährung e.V.). Vitamins in Animal Nutrition: Vitamin E; AgriMedia: Eisenberg, Germany, 2002; p. 50. ISBN 3-86037-167-3. [Google Scholar]
  84. Asmundson, V.S.; Kratzer, F.H. Observation on vitamin A deficiency in turkey breeding stock. Poult. Sci. 1952, 31, 71–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lima, H.J.D.; Souza, L.A.Z. Vitamin A in the diet of laying hens: Enrichment of table eggs to prevent nutritional deficiencies in humans. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Feng, Y.L.; Xie, M.; Tang, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Hou, S.S. Effects of vitamin A on growth performance and tissue retinol of starter White Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2189–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Scott, P.P.; Greaves, J.P.; Scott, M.G. Nutritional blindness in the cat. Exp. Eye Res. 1964, 3, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Murkey, S.P.; Agarwal, A.; Pandit, P.; Kumar, S.; Jaiswal, A. Unveiling the Spectrum of Ophthalmic Manifestations in Nutritional Deficiencies: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e50311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Palludan, B. The teratogenic effect of vitamin A deficiency in pigs. Acta Vet. Scand. 1961, 2, 32–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Orengo, J.; Hernández, F.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Sánchez, C.J.; Peres Rubio, C.; Madrid, J. Effects of Commercial Antioxidants in Feed on Growth Performance and Oxidative Stress Status of Weaned Piglets. Animals 2021, 11, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Blaxter, K.L. The significance of selenium and vitamin E in nutrition. Muscular dystrophy in farm animals: Its cause and prevention. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1962, 21, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hurley, W.L.; Doane, R.M. Recent developments in the roles of vitamins and minerals in reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 784–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ikeda, S.; Kitagawa, M.; Imai, H.; Yamada, M. The roles of vitamin A for cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes. J. Reprod. Dev. 2005, 51, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Threadgold, T.; Greenwood, E.C.; Van Wettere, W. Identifying Suitable Supplements to Improve Piglet Survival during Farrowing and Lactation. Animals 2021, 11, 2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Evans, H.M.; Burr, G.O. The anti-sterility fat soluble vitamin E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1925, 11, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, F.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Li, L.; Lin, X.; Gou, Z.; Fan, Q. Dietary Vitamin A Supplementation Improved Reproductive Performance by Regulating Ovarian Expression of Hormone Receptors, Caspase-3 and Fas in Broiler Breeders. Poult. Sci. 2015, 95, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Verstegen, J.; Dhaliwal, G.; Verstegen-Onclin, K. Canine and feline pregnancy loss due to viral and non-infectious causes: A review. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Barber, T.; Esteban-Pretel, G.; Marín, M.P.; Timoneda, J. Vitamin a deficiency and alterations in the extracellular matrix. Nutrients 2014, 6, 4984–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Burton, G.W.; Ingold, K.U. Vitamin E as an in vitro and in vivo antioxidant. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1989, 570, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shastak, Y.; Gordillo, A.; Pelletier, W. The relationship between vitamin A status and oxidative stress in animal production. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2023, 51, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vetinfo. Liquid Vitamins for Dogs. 2024. Available online: https://www.vetinfo.com/liquid-vitamins-for-dogs.html (accessed on 23 June 2024).
  102. Finno, C.J. Veterinary Pet Supplements and Nutraceuticals. Nutr. Today 2020, 55, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. EMA (European Medicines Agency). Injectable Veterinary Medicinal Products Containing Vitamin A for Use in Food Producing Species. EMEA/V/A/141. 2021. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/veterinary/referrals/injectable-veterinary-medicinal-products-containing-vitamin-use-food-producing-species (accessed on 27 June 2024).
  104. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Vitamin A (Retinyl acetate, retinyl palmitate and retinyl propionate) as a feed additive for all animal species and categories. EFSA J. 2013, 11, 3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Galli, G.M.; Andretta, I.; Martinez, N.; Wernick, B.; Shastak, Y.; Gordillo, A.; Gobi, J. Stability of vitamin A at critical points in pet-feed manufacturing and during premix storage. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1309754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Keen, M.A.; Hassan, I. Vitamin E in dermatology. Indian. Dermatol. Online J. 2016, 7, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Oh, H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.H.; Shin, Y.C.; Choi, W.I. Super-Antioxidant Vitamin A Derivatives with Improved Stability and Efficacy Using Skin-Permeable Chitosan Nanocapsules. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pignitter, M.; Somoza, V. Sustainable Nutrition in a Changing World; The Stability of Vitamins A and E in Edible Oils; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 295–305. [Google Scholar]
  109. Tadros, T.F. Surfactants, Industrial Applications. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd ed.; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bhalani, D.V.; Nutan, B.; Kumar, A.; Singh Chandel, A.K. Bioavailability Enhancement Techniques for Poorly Aqueous Soluble Drugs and Therapeutics. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. WHO; UNICEF; IVACG Task Force. Vitamin A Supplements: A Guide to Their Use in the Treatment and Prevention of Vitamin A Deficiency and Xerophthalmia, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997; Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/41947/9241545062.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 27 May 2024).
  112. WHO. Guideline: Vitamin A Supplementation in Infants and Children 6–59 Months of Age; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44664/9789241501767_eng.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2024).
  113. Yang, Y.; McClements, D.J. Vitamin E bioaccessibility: Influence of carrier oil type on digestion and release of emulsified α-tocopherol acetate. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. BASF (Badische Anilin- und Sodafabrik). Vitamins. In BASF Technical Handbook Animal Nutrition; BASF SE, Animal Nutrition: Ludwigshafen, Germany, 2014; pp. 48–70. [Google Scholar]
  115. Broze, G.; Pucci, C.; Navarro, A. Formulation of Transparent and Nutritive Microemulsions. Patent Application MX2014000135A. 2012. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/MX2014000135A/en (accessed on 5 July 2024).
  116. Ravichandran, V.; Lee, M.; Nguyen Cao, T.G.; Shim, M.S. Polysorbate-Based Drug Formulations for Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery and Anticancer Therapy. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yoshida, K.; Sekine, T.; Matsuzaki, F.; Yanaki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Stability of vitamin A in oil-in-water-in-oil-type multiple emulsions. J. Amer Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Song, Y.; Day, C.M.; Afinjuomo, F.; Tan, J.E.; Page, S.W.; Garg, S. Advanced Strategies of Drug Delivery via Oral, Topical, and Parenteral Administration Routes: Where Do Equine Medications Stand? Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Polania Gutierrez, J.J.; Munakomi, S. Intramuscular Injection; StatPearls Publishing. 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556121/ (accessed on 30 June 2024).
  120. Rahnfeld, L.; Luciani, P. Injectable lipid-based depot formulations: Where do we stand? Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Brief, S.; Chew, B.P. Effects of vitamin A and beta-carotene on reproductive performance in gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 1985, 60, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Stielow, M.; Witczyńska, A.; Kubryń, N.; Fijałkowski, Ł.; Nowaczyk, J.; Nowaczyk, A. The Bioavailability of Drugs-The Current State of Knowledge. Molecules 2023, 28, 8038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Coffey, M.T.; Britt, J.H. Enhancement of sow reproductive performance by beta-carotene or vitamin A. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 1198–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Silveira, P.R.; Fernandes, L.C.O.; Filho, J.C.M.; Junior, W.B. Efeito da vitamina A no desempenho reprodutivo de porcas [Effect of vitamin A on the reproductive performance of sows]. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 1997, 27, 743–748. [Google Scholar]
  125. Whaley, S.L.; Hedgpeth, V.S.; Farin, C.E.; Martus, N.S.; Jayes, F.C.L.; Britt, J.H. Influence of vitamin A injection before mating on oocyte development, follicular hormones, and ovulation in gilts fed high-energy diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Nelssen, J.L. Influence of a single injection of beta-carotene and or vitamin A at weaning on subsequent reproductive performance of sows. In Kansas State University Swine Day; Kansas State University: Mannhattan, KS, USA, 1994; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  127. Pusateri, A.E.; Diekman, M.A.; Singleton, W.L. Failure of vitamin A to increase litter size in sows receiving injections at various stages of gestation. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 1532–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ryan, T.; Liu, J.; Chu, A.; Wang, L.; Blais, A.; Skerjanc, I.S. Retinoic acid enhances skeletal myogenesis in human embryonic stem cells by expanding the premyogenic progenitor population. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2012, 8, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Song, P.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J. Vitamin A injection at birth improves muscle growth in lambs. Anim Nutr. 2023, 14, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Song, P.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Ji, B.; Zhao, J. Vitamin a potentiates sheep myoblasts myogenic differentiation through BHLHE40-modulated ID3 expression. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Smołucha, G.; Steg, A.; Oczkowicz, M. The Role of Vitamins in Mitigating the Effects of Various Stress Factors in Pigs Breeding. Animals 2024, 14, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Akinmoladun, O.F.; Muchenje, V.; Fon, F.N.; Mpendulo, C.T. Small Ruminants: Farmers’ Hope in a World Threatened by Water Scarcity. Animals 2019, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Amazan, D.; Rey, A.I.; Fernández, E.; López-Bote, C.J. Natural vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) supplementation in drinking water prevents oxidative stress in weaned piglets. Livest. Sci. 2012, 145, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Turner, P.V.; Brabb, T.; Pekow, C.; Vasbinder, M.A. Administration of substances to laboratory animals: Routes of administration and factors to consider. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2011, 50, 600–613. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Weir, M.; Ward, E. Giving Liquid Medication to Dogs. VCA Animal Hospitals. 2024. Available online: https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/giving-liquid-medication-to-dogs (accessed on 27 June 2024).
  136. Zhang, L.; Hou, Y.; Ma, Z.; Xie, J.; Fan, J.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, F.; Han, Z.; Liu, S.; Ma, D. Effect of oral vitamin A supplementation on host immune response to infectious bronchitis virus infection in specific pathogen-free chicken. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Edmonds, S.E.; Winyard, P.G.; Guo, R.; Kidd, B.; Merry, P.; Langrish-Smith, A.; Hansen, C.; Ramm, S.; Blake, D.R. Putative analgesic activity of repeated oral doses of vitamin E in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a prospective placebo controlled double blind trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1997, 56, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Bhattacharya, I.; Saxena, R.; Gupta, V. Efficacy of vitamin E in knee osteoarthritis management of North Indian geriatric population. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2012, 4, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Rhouma, M.; de Oliveira El Warrak, A.; Troncy, E.; Beaudry, F.; Chorfi, Y. Anti-inflammatory response of dietary vitamin E and its effects on pain and joint structures during early stages of surgically induced osteoarthritis in dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2013, 77, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  140. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific opinion of the panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on a request from the European commission on the consequences for the consumer of the use of Vitamin A in animal nutrition. EFSA J. 2008, 873, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.L.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Durjava, M.F.; Kouba, M.; Lopez-Alonso, M.; Lopez Puente, S.L.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of a feed additive consisting of all-rac-alpha-tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E) for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (NHU Europe GmbH). EFSA J. 2021, 19, 6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kelly, D.N.; Sleator, R.D.; Murphy, C.P.; Conroy, S.B.; Judge, M.M.; Berry, D.P. Large variability in feeding behavior among crossbred growing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ferguson, T.I.; Emery, S.; Price-Davies, R.; Cosslett, A.G. A review of stability issues associated with vitamins in parenteral nutrition. e-SPEN J. 2014, 9, e49–e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Somagond, Y.M.; Alhussien, M.N.; Dang, A.K. Repeated injection of multivitamins and multiminerals during the transition period enhances immune response by suppressing inflammation and oxidative stress in cows and their calves. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1059956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Wooten, H.; Kim, H.; Rakhshandeh, A.R.; Rakhshandeh, A. Glucocorticoid Receptor Agonists to Improve the Productivity and Health of Early-Weaned Pigs: What is the Best Method of Delivery? Animals 2020, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Hoque, M.A.; Suzuki, K. Genetics of Residual Feed Intake in Cattle and Pigs: A Review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Temova Rakuša, Ž.; Pišlar, M.; Kristl, A.; Roškar, R. Comprehensive Stability Study of Vitamin D3 in Aqueous Solutions and Liquid Commercial Products. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Gibbs, M.; Winnig, M.; Riva, I.; Dunlop, N.; Waller, D.; Klebansky, B.; Logan, D.W.; Briddon, S.J.; Holliday, N.D.; McGrane, S.J. Bitter taste sensitivity in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and its relevance to bitter deterrents of ingestion. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ford, R.B.; Mazzaferro, E.M. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. In Kirk and Bistner’s Handbook of Veterinary Procedures and Emergency Treatment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 449–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Adenot, C.C.; Abdelhakim, H.E. Palatability assessment of oral dosage forms for companion animals: A systematic review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 77, 103841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Dumlu, B. Importance of Nano-Sized Feed Additives in Animal Nutrition. J. Agric. Prod. 2024, 5, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hassan, A.A.; Mansour, M.K.; El Hamaky, A.M.; Sayed El Ahl, R.M.; Oraby, N.H. Nanomaterials and nanocomposite applications in veterinary medicine. Multifunct. Hybrid Nanomater. Sustain. Agri-Food Ecosyst. 2020, 2020, 583–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Praca, F.G.; Viegas, J.S.R.; Peh, H.Y.; Garbin, T.N.; Medina, W.S.G.; Bentley, M.V.L.B. Microemulsion co-delivering vitamin A and vitamin E as a new platform for topical treatment of acute skin inflammation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 110, 110639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural formula for all-trans-retinol.
Figure 1. Structural formula for all-trans-retinol.
Vetsci 11 00421 g001
Figure 2. ATRA (all-trans-retinoic acid) as a modulator of T cell immunity [36].
Figure 2. ATRA (all-trans-retinoic acid) as a modulator of T cell immunity [36].
Vetsci 11 00421 g002
Figure 3. Structural formula for α-tocopherol.
Figure 3. Structural formula for α-tocopherol.
Vetsci 11 00421 g003
Figure 4. Vitamin A bioavailability in chickens 14 days post-parenteral administration [11].
Figure 4. Vitamin A bioavailability in chickens 14 days post-parenteral administration [11].
Vetsci 11 00421 g004
Figure 5. Average latissimus dorsi muscle fiber diameter at harvest (adapted from Wang et al., [23]). Angus steer calves were administered with 0 (control) or 150,000 IU vitamin A (retinyl palmitate) per calf at birth and 1 month of age. The resulting steers were harvested at 14 months of age. * p < 0.05; Mean, n = 9.
Figure 5. Average latissimus dorsi muscle fiber diameter at harvest (adapted from Wang et al., [23]). Angus steer calves were administered with 0 (control) or 150,000 IU vitamin A (retinyl palmitate) per calf at birth and 1 month of age. The resulting steers were harvested at 14 months of age. * p < 0.05; Mean, n = 9.
Vetsci 11 00421 g005
Table 1. Estimated adequate vitamin A and E intake in dairy cattle [17,58].
Table 1. Estimated adequate vitamin A and E intake in dairy cattle [17,58].
CommitteeAdequate Intake of Vitamin A, IU/kg BW
Growing HeifersDry CowsLactating Cows,
(<35 kg milk/d)
Lactating Cows,
(>35 kg milk/d)
NASEM [58]110110110n/a
NASEM [17]110110110110 + (1000 × (milk-35))
Adequate Intake of Vitamin E, IU/kg BW
NASEM [58]0.81.60.8n/a
NASEM [17]0.81.60.8 (3) *0.8 (3) *
* Increased to 3 IU/kg BW for pre-fresh cows (2–3 weeks before parturition).
Table 2. Estimated adequate vitamin A and E intake in beef cattle [57,59].
Table 2. Estimated adequate vitamin A and E intake in beef cattle [57,59].
CommitteeAdequate Intake of Vitamin A, IU/kg DM Intake
Growing and FinishingGestating CowsLactating Cows
NASEM [57]220028003900
NASEM [59]220028003900
Adequate Intake of Vitamin E, IU/kg DM Intake
NASEM [57]15–60--
NASEM [59]15–6015–2040–60
Table 3. Vitamin A and E dietary recommendations for monogastric species.
Table 3. Vitamin A and E dietary recommendations for monogastric species.
Animal SpeciesVitamin A Recommendation, IU/kg FeedVitamin E Recommendation, IU/kg FeedSource
Broilers10,000–13,00055–80[71,72]
Laying hens8000–13,00020–30[73,74]
Turkeys5000–12,50020–100[75,76]
Broiler breeders10,000–13,000100[77,78]
Piglets8000–16,00084–150[79,80,81,82]
Finishing gilts and barrows4000–10,00033–80[79,80,81,82]
Lactating gilts and sows9920–14,00060–100[79,80,81,82]
Dogs8000–12,00080–120[83]
Cats15,000–25,000100–150[83]
Table 4. Diseases associated with vitamin E deficiency in different animal species [3].
Table 4. Diseases associated with vitamin E deficiency in different animal species [3].
DisorderAnimal ModelCompromised Organ/Tissue
Immune deficiencyChick, pigMononuclear phagocyte system
Myopathic disordersRabbit, duck, lamb, calf, turkey, chickenHeart, skeletal muscles, gizzard
Reproductive dysfunction
     embryonic apoptosisHen, turkey, cowEmbryonic circulatory system
     infertility (male)Rooster, rabbitTestes
Kidney, pancreas, liver, brain, blood
     necrobiosisPigLiver
     erythrocyte hemolysisChick, calfRed blood cells
     hypoproteinemiaChick, turkeyRicin
     cerebral softeningChick, ducklingEncephalon
     hemorrhagic diathesisChick, turkeyVascular system
     nephrosisMink, ratRenal tubular
     yellow fat diseasePigAdipose tissue
Table 5. Impacts of neonatal vitamin A administration on cattle growth performance * (adapted from Harris et al. [24]).
Table 5. Impacts of neonatal vitamin A administration on cattle growth performance * (adapted from Harris et al. [24]).
Parameter0 IU (n = 9)150,000 IU (n = 7)300,000 IU (n = 9)SE
Birth to weaning
Birth weight, kg35.135.635.60.58
Average daily gain, kg/d0.88 b0.98 a1.00 a0.02
Backgrounding
Weaning weight at d 210, kg219.2248.7246.05.98
Gain/feed ratio, kg0.1490.1530.1560.031
Finishing
Weight at 308 d, kg312.1 b333.0 ab339.7 a8.65
Feed/gain ratio, kg4.354.764.790.13
* Angus steer calves (n = 30) were randomly allocated to three treatment groups at birth, receiving 0, 150,000, or 300,000 IU of vitamin A at both birth and one month of age. a,b Mean values within a row with no common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Review of Liquid Vitamin A and E Formulations in Veterinary and Livestock Production: Applications and Perspectives. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090421

AMA Style

Shastak Y, Pelletier W. Review of Liquid Vitamin A and E Formulations in Veterinary and Livestock Production: Applications and Perspectives. Veterinary Sciences. 2024; 11(9):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shastak, Yauheni, and Wolf Pelletier. 2024. "Review of Liquid Vitamin A and E Formulations in Veterinary and Livestock Production: Applications and Perspectives" Veterinary Sciences 11, no. 9: 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090421

APA Style

Shastak, Y., & Pelletier, W. (2024). Review of Liquid Vitamin A and E Formulations in Veterinary and Livestock Production: Applications and Perspectives. Veterinary Sciences, 11(9), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop