Next Article in Journal
A Shelf-Life Assessment of Sterilized Surgical Instruments Stored Under Controlled Conditions: A Comparative Study of a Single vs. Double Self-Sealing Pouch
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Oxidant/Antioxidant Profile in Dogs with Mammary Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy, During the Peri-Operative Period
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Serum Immunoglobulin E Concentrations of Allergens in Dogs with Suspected Allergic Dermatitis Using the Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test in South Korea

1
Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2
Postbio, Gyeonggido 12106, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(6), 563; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060563
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 2 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 8 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Small Animal Clinical Dermatology)

Simple Summary

In dogs, specific substances, such as environmental factors, foods, and drugs, can trigger allergies, leading to excessive immune responses and antibody generation caused by exposure to allergens. This study investigated allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in the serum of dogs suspected of having allergic dermatitis in South Korea, aiming to explore regional, age, sex, and breed-related differences in sensitization to environmental and food allergens. Overall, Alternaria spp. was found to be the most prevalent environmental allergen, while lamb meat was the most prevalent food allergen. The highest IgE concentrations were observed in Japanese cedar for environmental allergens and flaxseed for food allergens. Additionally, this study analyzed the allergens predominantly found in South Korea and the IgE concentration of sensitization related to these allergens by age, sex, and breed. These findings provide valuable data for minimizing allergen exposure and customizing immunotherapy to improve the management of allergy symptoms in dogs.

Abstract

Type I allergies are triggered by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity reactions upon allergen exposure. Dogs are diagnosed with allergic dermatitis based on history, clinical signs, and allergen-specific IgE detection. Using the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST)–immunoblot assay, this study measured IgE concentrations and analyzed the proportion of dogs showing allergen-specific IgE positivity, and IgE concentrations of environmental and food allergens in South Korea. We examined data from canine serum using the MAST assay in 2023; the allergen panel included 130 allergens. Data were analyzed, with results greater than zero regarded as positive for the prevalence measurements and concentrations compared among subgroups. Overall, 2663 samples were evaluated to assess the proportion of dogs showing allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean concentrations of environmental and food allergens. Among the environmental allergens, Alternaria spp. had the highest IgE prevalence, whereas Japanese cedar had the highest mean IgE concentration. Allergen-specific differences were observed among subgroups categorized by age, sex, and breed. To our knowledge, this research is the first large-scale study to analyze canine serum using a MAST assay to assess the IgE prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and concentration and to examine data by age, sex, and breed. These findings provide information for diagnosis and management of canine allergies.

1. Introduction

Type I allergy is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction triggered by specific substances known as allergens, which can be present in the environment, foods, and drugs [1]. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays a key role in the adaptive immune system and mediates hypersensitivity reactions upon allergen exposure [2].
Type I allergy includes both CAD (Canine Atopic Dermatitis) and FAs (Food Allergies), depending on the sensitizing allergen [1]. In dogs, CAD is a genetically predisposed inflammatory skin condition associated with IgE antibodies primarily directed against environmental allergens [3,4], while FAs involve an immune response to specific food proteins [5]. Both are common dermatological conditions. An allergy is initially characterized by pruritus, which manifests as behaviors such as scratching, licking, rubbing, and head shaking, with lesions commonly occurring on the face, concave aspect of the pinnae, ventrum, axillae, inguinal region, perineal area, and distal extremities [3]. Identifying allergen-specific IgE in conjunction with clinical symptoms and a medical history is valuable for the diagnosis of allergic diseases [6]. When skin lesions are diagnosed as being caused by an allergy, elevated serum IgE levels are associated with the severity of allergic disease symptoms [7]. In contrast to CAD, FAs exhibit limited correlation between serum IgE levels and clinical manifestations, making elimination and provocation trials the preferred methods for accurate diagnosis [8,9]. Although strict dietary inclusion or exclusion criteria were not applied, food allergens were included in the present study to investigate sensitization patterns and to provide supplementary epidemiological insights within the study population.
In dogs exhibiting clinical signs suggestive of allergic skin disease, the diagnosis of allergic skin conditions can be supported by detecting allergen-specific IgE in serum [10]. The measurement of allergen-specific IgE has been developed based on various principles, including radioimmunoassay, enzyme immunoassay, and immunoblot techniques [6]. Accordingly, several assay methods are available, such as the radioallergosorbent test (RAST), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST). The MAST-immunoblot assay is widely used because, compared to the RAST and the ELISA, it enables the simultaneous detection of multiple allergens using a small volume of serum through a relatively rapid procedure, thereby reducing the financial burden on pet owners [1,6]. As a result, the increasing use of the MAST-immunoblot assay by clinicians may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of allergen-specific IgE sensitization profiles. Nevertheless, no large-scale studies have evaluated allergen-specific IgE detection using the MAST in dogs.
Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the associations between elevated serologic IgE levels—induced by environmental and food allergens—and dog subgroups categorized by age, sex, and breed in South Korea, according to the MAST assay results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

Blood samples were collected from dogs presenting with suspected allergic dermatitis at regional veterinary hospitals across South Korea and were forwarded to the laboratory (PobaniLab, South Korea) of one of the co-authors for diagnostic analysis between January and December 2023. The serum samples used in this study were originally submitted for the purpose of diagnosing allergic skin disease. Patient information, including age, sex, and breed, was obtained from the submitted request forms.
This study adhered to the Animal Protection Act of the Republic of Korea and the relevant animal welfare guidelines. Serum samples from dogs were collected as part of routine diagnostic procedures by licensed veterinarians to ensure appropriate animal handling and to minimize stress. Informed consent for blood collection and for the use of diagnostic results was obtained from the owners prior to clinical examination through a signed owners’ consent form.

2.2. Sample Collection and Transportation

At the veterinary hospital, 1–2 mL of serum was collected from each blood sample and aliquoted into sterile tubes according to the laboratory’s instructions. These serum samples were immediately shipped to the laboratory in a cooler bag (4–10 °C) and tested within 2 h of arrival.

2.3. MAST–Immunoblot Assay

The EuroBlotOne system (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) and the RoboScreen™ system (Mediwiss Analytic GmbH, Moers, Germany) were used for the MAST–immunoblot assay according to the manufacturers’ instructions, and all other experimental conditions were consistently maintained throughout the analyses. Briefly, 300 μL of each patient’s serum was pipetted into a reaction chamber containing allergens immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane and then incubated at room temperature for 45 min. After washing, the serum was added to an anti-canine IgE antibody conjugated with biotin, followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min. This biotin-conjugated antibody acts as a secondary antibody, catalyzing the transformation of a specific substrate with distinguishable properties. After washing to remove the unbound antibodies, the serum was added to 300 μL of streptavidin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The unbound conjugate was removed by washing. Next, we added the color-development solution, incubated the sample at room temperature for 20 min, and then dried the strips. The results were converted into IU/mL using a formula, specific to each antigen, which was built into the program based on the band’s color intensity [1]. All subjects underwent a MAST for 130 allergens classified into eight groups (molds, mites, insects, trees, grasses, weeds, others, and foods) as determined by the laboratory. Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials lists the specific allergens in each group.

2.4. Data and Statistical Analysis

Serum samples from dogs with suspected allergic dermatitis were analyzed using a standardized testing protocol that included both environmental and food allergen panels to identify overall sensitization patterns.
The data reflecting elevated allergen-specific IgE concentrations were transferred to a Microsoft Excel database (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) [11]. We calculated the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity as the proportion of nonzero values and defined the mean IgE concentration as the average of all values greater than zero. The mean IgE concentration is expressed as the 95% confidence interval (CI) and standard deviation (SD). For comparison, the data were categorized by age, sex, and breed. We used Fisher’s exact test and the one-way analysis of variance for analyzing the prevalence and the mean IgE concentration, respectively [12,13]. Each breed was evaluated relative to the entire group using the chi-square test [12] for prevalence and the t-test [14] for mean IgE concentration. Statistical data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS (version 28.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and the SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used GraphPad Prism (version 10.4.1; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) to visualize the overall prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentrations of environmental and food allergens [15] and to compare sex-based differences.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Mean IgE Concentrations of Major Environmental Allergens Using Serologic Allergen-Specific IgE Test Results

This study analyzed serologic allergen-specific IgE test results from 2663 dogs that tested positive for at least one allergen. Table 1 lists the signalments of the enrolled dogs. The allergen-specific IgE was most frequently detected in canine serum when exposed to the environmental allergen Alternaria spp., followed by Tyrophagus putrescentiae, house dust, Blomia tropicalis, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Cladosporium spp., D. farinae, Japanese cedar, cockroach mix, and Ctenocephalides spp. Mites accounted for four of these allergens, molds and insects for two each, and trees and others for one each. The canine serum showed the highest concentrations of allergen-specific IgE upon exposure to the allergen Japanese cedar, followed by B. tropicalis, Alternaria spp., bee venom, Lepidoglyphus destructor, T. putrescentiae, Ctenocephalides spp., D. pteronyssinus, house dust, and Glycyphagus domesticus. Table 2 presents the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and the mean serum IgE concentrations of the 10 most common environmental allergens. Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate such prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentration by allergen group.

3.2. Comparison of the Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Mean Serum IgE Concentrations of Environmental Allergens According to Age

The age at testing was between 2 months and 17.1 years (median: 4.3 years). The dogs were categorized according to age [16]: puppies (<1 year), adolescents (1 to <3 years), young adults (3 to <7 years), older adults (7 to <11 years), and seniors (11+ years). Among the 10 most prevalent environmental allergens, Alternaria spp., B. tropicalis, D. pteronyssinus, Cladosporium spp., and Ctenocephalides spp. showed an increasing prevalence with age. However, T. putrescentiae and D. farinae were less prevalent in seniors than in older adults. Japanese cedar was less prevalent in older adults than in young adults. Furthermore, house dust and cockroach mixtures were less prevalent among adolescents and older adults than among puppies and young adults.
The mean IgE concentration of Japanese cedar decreased with age (p = 0.003), whereas that of Alternaria spp. increased (p < 0.001). T. putrescentiae and Ctenocephalides spp. produced the highest mean IgE concentrations in young adults, with statistical significance. Table 3 presents the statistical significance of the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentration comparisons among the five age groups.

3.3. Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Mean Serum IgE Levels of Environmental Allergens According to Sex

The dogs were categorized into five categories as follows: intact males, neutered males, intact females, neutered females, and unknown. However, the comparisons excluded the unknown group. Among the 10 most prevalent allergens, house dust, and Ctenocephalides spp. were higher in intact males, whereas B. tropicalis was higher in neutered dogs than in intact dogs. However, the prevalence of these allergens did not significantly differ among subgroups within the sex categories (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1).
For the mean IgE concentrations of the top-ranking allergens, T. putrescentiae (p = 0.007) was significantly higher in intact and neutered females than in intact and neutered males.

3.4. Comparison of the Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Mean IgE Concentrations of Environmental Allergens Between the Overall Group and the Five Specific Breeds

In this study, serum samples obtained for testing were categorized by breed to compare allergen-specific IgE sensitization patterns, aiming to identify potential breed-related predispositions and to examine the associated clinical and epidemiological tendencies. The serologic IgE test analysis included 36 dog breeds. In the breed classification, the “Mix” category refers to dogs resulting from the crossbreeding of two officially recognized breeds (e.g., Maltese and Poodle). Since these dogs cannot be classified as a single breed, they were excluded from the breed-specific subgroup. The five most frequently tested breeds were Bichon Frisé (17.2%), Maltese (16.5%), Toy Poodle (15.6%), Pomeranian (7.3%), and Shih Tzu (3.2%), accounting for 60.4% of the total. In these breeds, Alternaria spp. and T. putrescentiae consistently ranked first and second in prevalence, respectively.
In the five most frequently tested breeds, Japanese cedar exhibited the highest mean IgE concentration. Among the other groups, mite allergens were consistently among the most prevalent. Certain allergens showed notably elevated levels in specific breeds, although they were not similarly elevated in other breeds; for example, cat allergen in Malteses, Russian thistle in Pomeranians, and pigweed mix (p = 0.013) in Shih Tzus. Table 4 presents the 10 most prevalent environment allergens and their mean IgE concentration according to the breed.

3.5. Food Allergen Evaluation Based on the Results of Allergen-Specific Serologic IgE Testing

The allergen-specific IgE was most frequently detected in canine serum when exposed food allergens such as lamb meat, followed by flaxseed, pineapple, brewer’s yeast, corn, watermelon, quail, spinach, aloe vera, and beta-lactoglobulin (Supplementary Materials, Table S2). The prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity had a SD of 0.24, indicating relatively small differences among them. Moreover, the concentration of allergen-specific IgE was high in dogs, especially when exposed to the allergen flaxseed, followed by aloe vera, lamb meat, corn, plum, pineapple, casein, watermelon, brewer’s yeast, and gluten (Supplementary Materials, Table S3).
The serologic IgE prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity for food allergens increased with age, except among the 10 frequently detected food allergens, where older adults showed a lower prevalence than young adults. This difference was statistically significant for lamb meat, flaxseed, pineapple, brewer’s yeast, corn, watermelon, quail, and beta-lactoglobulin. The mean IgE concentrations based on age differed by allergen; for instance, aloe vera and plum resulted in a decrease with age, whereas brewer’s yeast caused an increased.
Moreover, the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity showed no significant difference within the sex-based subgroups, but neutered males and females tended to have a higher prevalence than intact males and females. However, in the neutered females, lamb meat (p = 0.003) and casein (p < 0.001) gave the highest mean IgE concentrations.
The most prevalent food allergens were similar among the five most frequently tested breeds, although peach and cacao allergies were more common in Shih Tzus. The mean IgE concentrations of the major food allergens were also consistent across breeds, with flaxseed producing the highest concentrations in all breeds.

4. Discussion

This study analyzed the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentrations of allergens in 2663 canine serum samples, which were refrigerated and collected in South Korea between January 1 and December 31, 2023. Previous studies have reported that nonfrozen serum may yield higher sensitivity in IgE detection [17]; however, all samples in the present study were stored under refrigerated conditions and were not frozen. The present study employed the MAST assay, which is known for its accuracy comparable to the ELISA and its ability to quickly and simultaneously analyze multiple allergens [1]. Although the sensitivity and specificity may be lower compared to the SPT, a MAST has the advantages of being applicable regardless of the patient’s skin condition and reduced stress imposed on the patient [18]. Among environmental allergens, Alternaria spp. had the highest prevalence, consistent with the findings of a previous small-scale study conducted at a regional hospital in South Korea [19]. Alternaria spp. is pathogenic to both humans and animals, and its year-round presence in both indoor and outdoor environments may significantly impact allergic responses [20].
House dust mites are the primary allergens responsible for CAD worldwide [21]. However, in our study, T. putrescentiae, a storage mite, was the most predominant among mite allergens, followed by house dust mites such as B. tropicalis, D. pteronyssinus, and D. farinae. A previous study on environmental allergens in humans in South Korea identified D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae as the most prevalent mite allergens, contrary to our findings [22]. In this study, the prevalence of the flea allergen Ctenocephalides spp. was lower than that of house dust mites and storage mites. This finding is consistent with previous studies conducted in Italy and other European regions, where the prevalence of flea allergens has also been reported to be moderate to low [4]. Allergic reactions to fleas differ from those to other allergens in terms of hypersensitivity mechanisms, and the possibility of cross-reactivity with other allergens exists. These factors may have influenced the results [23,24]. Therefore, ongoing research on regional allergen sensitization in dogs may provide key insights to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve the effectiveness of allergen-specific immunotherapy in managing canine allergic skin diseases.
Environmental allergens can be further classified into indoor and outdoor allergens [4]. An Italian study that employed the ELISA identified grass allergens, including Bermuda grass and timothy grass, as the most common outdoor allergens in dogs; sheep sorrel was also frequently detected. Similarly, a study in South Korea using the MAST-immunoblot assay reported a high prevalence of grass allergens in humans [22]. However, in our study, the most common outdoor allergens in dogs were tree allergens such as Japanese cedar, sycamore mix, and pine rather than grass allergens. Considering methodological differences, our interpretation aimed to identify overarching patterns, with the observed variation potentially stemming from differences in exposure resulting from geographical and climatic factors affecting outdoor allergen distribution [4]. Another possible reason is the differences in sensitization rates between dogs and humans [25]. Further large-scale longitudinal studies using consistent analytical methods are needed to investigate allergen prevalence and temporal trends in response to regional and environmental variations in veterinary medicine.
The rankings of the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean serum IgE concentrations of allergens differed in this study. Japanese cedar had the highest mean IgE concentration among the environmental allergens, followed by B. tropicalis and Alternaria spp. In humans, IgE antibody concentrations specific to Alternaria spp. peak during adolescence and early adulthood but sharply decline after the age of 25–27 years [26]. Conversely, in dogs, IgE levels specific to Alternaria spp. increased continuously with age. Previous human studies reported an association between serologic IgE concentrations and the severity of allergic symptoms, as well as their role in increasing the risk of allergy in asymptomatic individuals [27,28], suggesting that comparable immunologic mechanisms may also be involved in dogs. Serum IgE concentrations are useful not only for selecting allergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy but also for monitoring treatment responses [7,29]. Accordingly, the findings of this study may provide valuable insights into regional and age-related sensitization patterns and contribute to the formulation of effective immunotherapy strategies.
This study also compared the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and IgE concentrations of allergens across age, sex, and breed groups. Ten environmental allergens, that are widely distributed in South Korea, showed no significant differences according to sex or neuter status, consistent with previous findings [30,31,32]. However, the age-based analysis showed that the 10 allergens with relatively high occurrence were less prevalent in puppies and adolescents than in young adults, older adults, and seniors. This finding aligns with a previous South Korean study that analyzed the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE using an ELISA kit [33]. However, in our study, Alternaria spp. prevalence across age groups was statistically insignificant. One reason for this result is the unbalanced distribution of the data, particularly the very low number of “negative” cases in the senior group, with only one case. To improve the balance of data distribution, we need to conduct further research with a larger sample size to increase the number of negative cases.
The five breeds most frequently tested in this study (Bichon Frisé, Maltese, Toy Poodle, Pomeranian, and Shih Tzu) are not among the commonly reported high-risk breeds for CAD [12]. However, the breed-specific analysis of IgE concentrations revealed notable differences. Cat allergens were elevated in the Maltese, and Russian thistle and pigweed were present in the Pomeranian and Shih Tzu breeds, respectively, compared with other breeds. The clinical significance of these elevated IgE concentrations in certain breeds remains unclear. Hence, the prevalence, concentration, and potential associations between allergen-specific IgE and clinical symptoms in various breeds requires further investigation.
In dogs living in Australia, Europe, and North America, food elimination and provocation trials have demonstrated that beef, chicken, and wheat flour are the most frequently identified food allergens [34]. However, our study did not observe clear differences in food allergen prevalence or identify dominant food allergens. The prevalence of beef, chicken, and wheat flour was relatively low, which is inconsistent with the findings of a previous study conducted in South Korea during a similar period [19]. Instead, the most prevalent food allergens in this study were flax seed, lamb meat, corn, and pineapple, all of which showed high serum IgE concentrations. This discrepancy may be attributed to the short half-life of IgE and its susceptibility to recent exposure to food allergens [9]. As serologic IgE testing alone cannot confirm food allergies and may reflect recent exposure rather than true sensitization, its results should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, to confirm food allergies in dogs, additional diagnostic methods such as elimination diets and provocation trials are necessary. Serologic testing may serve as a supportive tool in guiding the development of an appropriate treatment plan. Moreover, the results of the present study showed that Shih Tzus had a higher IgE positivity rate to peach and to cacao compared to other breeds, and elevated IgE concentrations to flaxseed were observed across all breeds. These findings suggest the possibility of breed-specific sensitization to certain allergens as well as regional sensitization patterns, highlighting the need for further research to clarify these associations.
This study has some limitations that warrant consideration. First, clinical information such as skin lesions, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and diet-related history was not included. Although allergen sensitization is a significant risk factor for the development of allergic diseases, it does not necessarily indicate clinical allergy, as some sensitized individuals may remain asymptomatic [28]. Allergen-specific IgE testing using the MAST assay is known to have high sensitivity but low specificity; nevertheless, it remains a useful screening tool for identifying clinically suspected cases [10]. Future studies should aim to more precisely evaluate the diagnostic utility and clinical relevance of allergen-specific IgE testing by correlating the results with clinical signs and intradermal test outcomes and dietary history.
Second, this study analyzed data from a single year, which limited our ability to assess annual, seasonal, or monthly variations in serum IgE levels. In addition, the absence of both negative and positive control groups presents a limitation in evaluating the diagnostic validity of the findings. Future longitudinal multi-year studies incorporating appropriate control groups could help identify trends in pollen allergies, temporal changes in allergen prevalence, and fluctuations in mean IgE concentrations. Such studies would also aid in developing strategies to minimize allergen exposure in dogs with elevated IgE levels and enhance the diagnostic robustness of allergen-specific IgE testing [35,36].

5. Conclusions

This study is the first large-scale analysis of canine serum that uses the MAST assay to investigate the prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and serum IgE concentrations of allergens. Using this assay, we measured allergen-specific IgE levels across environmental and food allergens. The data were further examined according to age, sex, and breed, providing insights into variations within canine populations. The findings of this study may assist clinicians in early decision-making for dietary management and allergen-specific immunotherapy by providing population-level IgE sensitization patterns. The emphasis on sensitivity enhances its utility as a screening tool in clinical settings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci12060563/s1, Table S1: Classification of allergen panels used in the MAST assay into environmental and food allergens; Table S2: The allergen-specific IgE prevalence for food allergens in canine serum, analyzed using the MAST assay and classified by age, sex, and breed; Table S3: The mean concentrations of allergen-specific IgE for food allergens in canine serum, analyzed using the MAST assay and classified by age, sex, and breed; Figure S1: (A) Sex-related prevalence of environmental allergen-specific IgE in dogs based on the MAST results. (B) Sex-related mean concentrations of environmental allergen-specific IgE in dogs based on the MAST results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-S.J. and J.-E.H.; methodology, Y.-S.J.; software, Y.-S.J.; validation, Y.-S.J. and J.-E.H.; formal analysis, Y.-S.J.; investigation, Y.-S.J.; resources, D.-S.C.; data curation, Y.-S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-S.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.-S.J., J.-E.H., A.N., J.-I.H. and E.-S.L.; visualization, Y.-S.J.; supervision, Y.-S.J.; project administration and funding acquisition, J.-E.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The blood samples utilized in this study were obtained from dogs suspected of having allergic dermatitis for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, with the consent of their owners; ethical approval was not required. The procedure was conducted in full compliance with the consent agreements signed by the pet owners, which authorized the hospital to use the test results. We assure you that all samples were collected with the utmost care, strictly adhering to the hospital’s standard ethical guidelines to ensure that no harm was caused to the dogs.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the owners to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author, Doo-Sung Cheon is form Postbio Inc. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

IgEimmunoglobulin E
CADcanine atopic dermatitis
FAsfood allergies
RASTradioallergosorbent test
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
MASTmultiple allergen simultaneous test
CIconfidence interval
SDstandard deviation

References

  1. Han, J.Y.; Lee, H.; Chung, J.L.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Tchah, H. Multiple allergen simultaneous test-immunoblot assay for immunoglobulin E detection in patients with isolated allergic conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhao, J.; Liang, S.; Zhou, B.; Li, M.; Li, L. A comprehensive analysis of immunoglobulin E levels, allergen-specific sensitivities, and clinical manifestations in allergic dermatological conditions: A multicenter retrospective study in China. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2024, 17, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hensel, P.; Santoro, D.; Favrot, C.; Hill, P.; Griffin, C. Canine atopic dermatitis: Detailed guidelines for diagnosis and allergen identification. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Di Tommaso, M.; Luciani, A.; Crisi, P.E.; Beschi, M.; Rosi, P.; Rocconi, F.; Miglio, A. Detection of serum allergen-specific IgE in atopic dogs tested in northern Italy: Preliminary study. Animals 2021, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jackson, H.A. Food allergy in dogs and cats; current perspectives on etiology, diagnosis, and management. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2023, 261, S23–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rim, J.H.; Park, B.G.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.S. Comparison and clinical utility evaluation of four multiple allergen simultaneous tests including two newly introduced fully automated analyzers. Pract. Lab. Med. 2016, 4, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Corsico, A.G.; De Amici, M.; Ronzoni, V.; Giunta, V.; Mennitti, M.C.; Viscardi, A.; Marseglia, G.L.; Ciprandi, G. Allergen-specific immunoglobulin E and allergic rhinitis severity. Allergy Rhinol. 2017, 8, ar-2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gedon, N.K.Y.; Mueller, R.S. Atopic dermatitis in cats and dogs: A difficult disease for animals and owners. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2018, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gaschen, F.P.; Merchant, S.R. Adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2011, 41, 361–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nam, H.Y.; Yun, T.S.; Koo, Y.H.; Lee, D.H.; Chae, Y.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, D.J.; Kim, H.H.; Yang, M.P.; Kang, B.T. Comparison of intradermal skin test and multiple allergen simultaneous test results in canine atopic dermatitis. J. Vet. Clin. 2021, 38, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodriguez-Campos, S.; Rostaher, A.; Zwickl, L.; Fischer, N.M.; Brodard, I.; Vidal, S.; Brandt, B.W.; Favrot, C.; Perreten, V. Impact of the early life skin microbiota on the development of canine atopic dermatitis in a high-risk breed birth cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jaeger, K.; Linek, M.; Power, H.T.; Bettenay, S.V.; Zabel, S.; Rosychuk, R.; Mueller, R. Breed and site predispositions of dogs with atopic dermatitis: A comparison of five locations in three continents. Vet. Dermatol. 2010, 21, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, H.Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J.J.; Jiao, C.H.; Zhao, X.J.; Li, X.T.; Lu, M.J.; Mao, X.Q.; Zhang, H.J. Serological investigation of IgG and IgE antibodies against food antigens in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 26, 2189–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Park, H.J.; Kim, E.J.; Yoon, D.; Lee, J.K.; Chang, W.S.; Lim, Y.M.; Park, J.W.; Lee, J.S. Prevalence of self-reported allergic diseases and IgE levels: A 2010 knhanes analysis. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2017, 9, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, E.; Choe, C.; Yoo, J.G.; Oh, S.-I.; Jung, Y.; Cho, A.; Kim, S.; Do, Y.J. Major medical causes by breed and life stage for dogs presented at veterinary clinics in the Republic of Korea: A survey of electronic medical records. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nam, Y.; White, M.; Karlsson, E.K.; Creevy, K.E.; Promislow, D.E.L.; McClelland, R.L. Dog size and patterns of disease history across the canine age spectrum: Results from the dog aging project. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0295840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Garib, V.; Rigler, E.; Gastager, F.; Campana, R.; Dorofeeva, Y.; Gattinger, P.; Zhernov, Y.; Khaitov, M.; Valenta, R. Determination of IgE and IgG reactivity to more than 170 allergen molecules in paper-dried blood spots. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, Y.H.; Yu, B.J.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, G.H.; Lee, K.A.; Cho, J.H. Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 31, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoon, B.G.; Lee, H.J.; Song, K.H. Serum allergen-specific and total IgE concentrations in dogs with allergic disorders in South Korea. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2023, 46, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martins, L.M.L. Allergy to fungi in veterinary medicine: Alternaria, dermatophytes and Malassezia pay the bill! J. Fungi 2022, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Favrot, C.; Olivry, T.; Iwasaki, T. An international seroprevalence survey of the IgE sensitisation to the Dermatophagoides farinae house dust mite and two of its major allergens (Der f 2, Zen 1) in atopic dogs. Vet. Dermatol. 2022, 33, 117-e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, I.; Minn, D.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.K.; Cho, J.H. Aeroallergen sensitization status in South Korea from 2018 to 2021. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2022, 15, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Streicher, M. Flea allergy dermatitis. In Small Animal Dermatology for Technicians and Nurses; Horne, K., Schwassmann, M., Logas, D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 85–101. [Google Scholar]
  24. Laffort-Dassot, C.; Carlotti, D.N.; Pin, D.; Jasmin, P. Diagnosis of flea allergy dermatitis: Comparison of intradermal testing with flea allergens and a FcepsilonRI alpha-based IgE assay in response to flea control. Vet. Dermatol. 2004, 15, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, H.; Lee, J.; Jeong, K.Y.; Cheon, D.S.; Park, J.W. Comparison of sensitization patterns to dust mite allergens between atopic dermatitis patients and dogs, and non-specific reactivity of canine IgE to the storage mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 88, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Amici, M.; Ciprandi, G. The age impact on serum total and allergen-specific IgE. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2013, 5, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chiu, C.Y.; Huang, Y.L.; Tsai, M.H.; Tu, Y.L.; Hua, M.C.; Yao, T.C.; Yeh, K.W.; Huang, J.L. Sensitization to food and inhalant allergens in relation to atopic diseases in early childhood: A birth cohort study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dor-Wojnarowska, A.; Liebhart, J.; Miecielica, J.; Rabski, M.; Fal, A.; Samoliński, B.; Nittner-Marszalska, M. The impact of sex and age on the prevalence of clinically relevant sensitization and asymptomatic sensitization in the general population. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2017, 65, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nikolov, G.; Todordova, Y.; Emilova, R.; Hristova, D.; Nikolova, M.; Petrunov, B. Allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 as biomarkers for immunologic changes during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Antibodies 2021, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Favrot, C.; Steffan, J.; Seewald, W.; Picco, F. A prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis. Vet. Dermatol. 2010, 21, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herrmann, I.; Einhorn, L.; Panakova, L. Gender aspects in allergies of pets—A secondary publication and update. World Allergy Organ. J. 2017, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Drechsler, Y.; Dong, C.; Clark, D.E.; Kaur, G. Canine atopic dermatitis: Prevalence, impact, and management strategies. Vet. Med. Res. Rep. 2024, 15, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Adam, G.O.; Park, Y.G.; Cho, J.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Oh, H.G. Detecting common allergens in dogs with atopic dermatitis in South Korean Provinces using a serological immunoglobulin E-specific allergen test. Vet. World 2022, 15, 1996–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mueller, R.S.; Olivry, T.; Prélaud, P. Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): Common food allergen sources in dogs and cats. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dong, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, H.; Guo, D. Prevalence and association with environmental factors and establishment of prediction model of atopic dermatitis in pet dogs in China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1428805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Park, H.J.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, K.H.; Kim, K.R.; Han, M.J.; Choe, H.; Oh, J.W.; Hong, C.S. A six-year study on the changes in airborne pollen counts and skin positivity rates in Korea: 2008–2013. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity of allergens within environmental allergen groups (molds, mites, insects, trees, weeds, grasses, and others) analyzed through serologic IgE testing, presented in descending order.
Figure 1. Prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity of allergens within environmental allergen groups (molds, mites, insects, trees, weeds, grasses, and others) analyzed through serologic IgE testing, presented in descending order.
Vetsci 12 00563 g001
Figure 2. Mean IgE concentrations of allergens within environmental allergen groups (molds, mites, insects, trees, weeds, grasses, and others) examined through serologic IgE testing, sorted in descending order.
Figure 2. Mean IgE concentrations of allergens within environmental allergen groups (molds, mites, insects, trees, weeds, grasses, and others) examined through serologic IgE testing, sorted in descending order.
Vetsci 12 00563 g002
Table 1. Demographic distribution of dogs undergoing multiple allergen simultaneous tests in 2023.
Table 1. Demographic distribution of dogs undergoing multiple allergen simultaneous tests in 2023.
CategoryNumber of Dogs (%)
SexMaleIntact male112 (4.2)
Neutered male1301 (48.9)
FemaleIntact female198 (7.4)
Neutered female1005 (37.7)
Unknown47 (1.8)
AgePuppies (<1 year)268 (10.1)
Adolescents (1 to <3 years)893 (33.5)
Young adults (3 to <7 years)913 (34.3)
Older adults (7 to <11 years)472 (17.7)
Seniors (11+ years)117 (4.4)
BreedBichon Frisé472 (17.7)
Maltese440 (16.5)
Toy Poodle416 (15.6)
Pomeranian195 (7.3)
Shih Tzu85 (3.2)
Chihuahua63 (2.4)
French bulldog59 (2.2)
Coton de Tulear48 (1.8)
Yorkshire Terrier43 (1.6)
Mix452 (17.0)
Table 2. Prominent allergens were identified according to their prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean allergen-specific IgE concentrations in canine serum.
Table 2. Prominent allergens were identified according to their prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean allergen-specific IgE concentrations in canine serum.
RankEnvironmental AllergensPercentage
(%)
95% CI
(%)
Environmental AllergensMean IgE Concentration
(IU/mL)
95% CI
(IU/mL)
1Alternaria spp.98.497.8–98.8Japanese cedar11.7111.21–12.20
2Tyrophagus putrescentiae96.495.6–97.0B. tropicalis3.042.93–3.16
3House dust86.985.6–88.2Alternaria spp.2.622.52–2.70
4Blomia tropicalis85.884.5–87.1Bee venom2.271.69–2.84
5Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus83.982.5–85.3Lepidoglyphus destructor1.771.52–2.03
6Cladosporium spp.80.779.2–82.2T. putrescentiae1.661.58–1.75
7D. farinae71.970.1–73.5Ctenocephalides spp.1.381.05–1.20
8Japanese cedar63.461.6–65.2D. pteronyssinus1.281.17–1.40
9Cockroach mix55.753.8–57.6House dust1.241.14–1.35
10Ctenocephalides spp.52.150.2–54.0Glycyphagus domesticus1.221.17–1.28
CI: confidence interval.
Table 3. Age-related comparison of environmental allergen-specific IgE prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean concentrations in dogs according to the MAST results.
Table 3. Age-related comparison of environmental allergen-specific IgE prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean concentrations in dogs according to the MAST results.
RankAllergensPuppiesAdolescentsYoung AdultsOlder AdultsSeniorsp-Value
Prevalence (%)1Alternaria spp.97.497.998.799.299.20.217
2Tyrophagus putrescentiae94.495.696.998.195.70.041
3House dust86.683.389.289.089.70.003
4Blomia tropicalis81.084.387.187.791.50.016
5Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus79.581.085.587.788.90.001
6Cladosporium spp.74.376.781.986.494.0<0.001
7D. farinae66.068.274.476.973.50.001
8Japanese cedar56.761.965.664.070.90.029
9Cockroach mix56.351.358.556.662.40.016
10Ctenocephalides spp.44.052.453.253.454.70.088
Mean IgE concentration (IU/mL)1Japanese cedar13.1412.4611.5810.668.770.003
2B. tropicalis2.932.983.183.002.930.577
3Alternaria spp.2.252.422.732.852.92<0.001
4Bee venom1.521.922.791.594.350.256
5Lepidoglyphus destructor1.471.671.971.751.440.786
6T. putrescentiae1.251.441.871.871.73<0.001
7Ctenocephalides spp.1.141.341.591.231.200.030
8D. pteronyssinus0.991.231.371.351.320.421
9House dust1.181.231.241.201.720.414
10Glycyphagus domesticus1.181.231.261.191.190.896
Table 4. Breed-specific comparison of major environmental allergens with the highest prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentrations according to serologic IgE analysis in dogs.
Table 4. Breed-specific comparison of major environmental allergens with the highest prevalence of allergen-specific IgE positivity and mean IgE concentrations according to serologic IgE analysis in dogs.
RankAllergensBichon FriséAllergensMalteseAllergensToy PoodleAllergensPomeranianAllergensShih Tzu
Prevalence (%)1Alternaria spp.98.3Alternaria spp.99.1Alternaria spp.97.8Alternaria spp.97.4Alternaria spp.97.7
2Tyrophagus putrescentiae95.3T. putrescentiae96.1T. putrescentiae96.9T. putrescentiae95.9T. putrescentiae95.3
3Blomia tropicalis85.4House dust87.7House dust87.3House dust90.3Cladosporium spp.85.9
4House dust84.5D. pteronyssinus86.1B. tropicalis86.1B. tropicalis83.1House dust85.9
5Dermatophagoides
pteronyssinus
80.9B. tropicalis85.7D. pteronyssinus82.5D. pteronyssinus82.1D. pteronyssinus83.5
6Cladosporium spp.77.5Cladosporium spp.82.5Cladosporium spp.81.3Cladosporium spp.79.0B. tropicalis81.2
7D. farinae67.2D. farinae71.4D. farinae75.0D. farinae63.6D. farinae78.8
8Japanese cedar62.3Japanese cedar65.7Japanese cedar58.9Japanese cedar63.1Japanese cedar64.7
9Cockroach mix54.2Cockroach mix57.7Cockroach mix51.9Cockroach mix59.0Cockroach mix60.0
10Ctenocephalides spp.53.0Sycamore mix50.9Ctenocephalides spp.48.3Ctenocephalides spp.49.2Ctenocephalides spp.58.8
Mean IgE
concentration
(IU/mL)
1Japanese cedar11.57Japanese cedar10.79Japanese cedar12.65Japanese cedar12.79Japanese cedar11.34
2B. tropicalis2.90B. tropicalis2.92B. tropicalis3.03Russian thistle5.06Pigweed mix3.90
3Alternaria spp.2.51Alternaria spp.2.65Alternaria spp.2.39B. tropicalis3.11Bee venom3.37
4Bee venom2.09T. putrescentiae1.78L. destructor1.77Alternaria spp.2.45B. tropicalis2.74
5Lepidoglyphus destructor1.60Bee venom1.70T. putrescentiae1.56T. putrescentiae1.41Alternaria spp.2.57
6T. putrescentiae1.44L. destructor1.55D. pteronyssinus1.26Ctenocephalides1.36T. putrescentiae2.24
7Ctenocephalides spp.1.43D. pteronyssinus1.31Ctenocephalides spp.1.20L. destructor1.30L. destructor1.96
8House dust1.37Ctenocephalides spp.1.26Bee venom1.13G. domesticus1.20Acarus siro1.95
9D. pteronyssinus1.36Cat1.18Malassezia spp.1.13House dust1.18D. pteronyssinus1.66
10Glycyphagus domesticus1.25G. domesticus1.14G. domesticus1.11Malassezia spp.1.12D. farinae1.61
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, Y.-S.; Han, J.-I.; Lee, E.-S.; Cheon, D.-S.; Nam, A.; Hyun, J.-E. Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Serum Immunoglobulin E Concentrations of Allergens in Dogs with Suspected Allergic Dermatitis Using the Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test in South Korea. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060563

AMA Style

Jang Y-S, Han J-I, Lee E-S, Cheon D-S, Nam A, Hyun J-E. Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Serum Immunoglobulin E Concentrations of Allergens in Dogs with Suspected Allergic Dermatitis Using the Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test in South Korea. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(6):563. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Yoon-Seok, Jae-Il Han, Eun-Soo Lee, Doo-Sung Cheon, Aryung Nam, and Jae-Eun Hyun. 2025. "Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Serum Immunoglobulin E Concentrations of Allergens in Dogs with Suspected Allergic Dermatitis Using the Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test in South Korea" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 6: 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060563

APA Style

Jang, Y.-S., Han, J.-I., Lee, E.-S., Cheon, D.-S., Nam, A., & Hyun, J.-E. (2025). Prevalence of Allergen-Specific IgE Positivity and Serum Immunoglobulin E Concentrations of Allergens in Dogs with Suspected Allergic Dermatitis Using the Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Test in South Korea. Veterinary Sciences, 12(6), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop