Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Age and Body Weight of the Broiler Breeders Male on the Presentation of Oxidative Stress and Its Correlation with the Quality of Testicular Parenchyma and Physiological Antioxidant Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Thalidomide Reduces Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Immunostaining in Canine Splenic Hemangiosarcoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 7
Issue 2
10.3390/vetsci7020068
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Minimal Invasive Piezoelectric Osteotomy in Neurosurgery: Technic, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective Case Series

by
Alberto Maria Crovace
1,*,
Sabino Luzzi
2,3,*,
Luca Lacitignola
1,
Gerardo Fatone
4,
Alice Giotta Lucifero
2,3,
Tomaso Vercellotti
5 and
Antonio Crovace
1
1
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
2
Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
4
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy
5
Eastman Dental Institute, University College of London, WC1E 6BT London, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2020, 7(2), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020068
Submission received: 7 April 2020 / Revised: 18 May 2020 / Accepted: 20 May 2020 / Published: 22 May 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objective: To report the physical and technical principles, clinical applications, and outcomes of the minimal invasive piezoelectric osteotomy in a consecutive veterinary neurosurgical series. Methods: A series of 292 dogs and 32 cats underwent an osteotomy because a neurosurgical pathology performed with a Mectron Piezosurgery® bone scalpel (Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) was retrospectively reviewed. Efficacy, precision, safety, and blood loss were evaluated intraoperatively by two different surgeons, on a case-by-case basis. Postoperative Rx and CT scans were used to assess the selectivity and precision of the osteotomy. A histological study on bony specimens at the osteotomized surface was carried out to evaluate the effects of piezoelectric cutting on the osteocytes and osteoblasts. All the patients underwent a six-months follow-up. A series of illustrative cases was reported. Results: All the osteotomies were clear-cut and precise. A complete sparing of soft and nervous tissues and vasculature was observed. The operative field was blood- and heat-free in all cases. A range of inserts, largely different in shape and length, were allowed to treat deep and difficult-to-reach sites. Two mechanical complications occurred. Average blood loss in dogs’ group was 52, 47, and 56 mL for traumatic, degenerative, and neoplastic lesions, respectively, whereas it was 25 mL for traumatized cats. A fast recovery of functions was observed in most of the treated cases, early on, at the first sixth-month evaluation. Histology on bone flaps showed the presence of live osteocytes and osteoblasts at the osteotomized surface in 92% of cases. Conclusions: Piezosurgery is based on the physical principle of the indirect piezo effect. Piezoelectric osteotomy is selective, effective, and safe in bone cutting during neurosurgical veterinary procedures. It can be considered a minimal invasive technique, as it is able to spare the neighboring soft tissues and neurovascular structures.

1. Introduction

Piezoelectric osteotomy is based upon the mechanical effect of ultrasound, which is increased by physical phenomenon of cavitation.
Microvibrations of the ultrasonic frequency are linear in shape and micrometric (60–210 μm). They allow us to selectively cut the bone without significant damage to the underlying soft and neurovascular tissues [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Oscillation frequency ranges between 25 and 30 kHz, the same frequencies at which soft tissues, dura mater, nerves, and blood vessels oscillate at the same time being spared [8,12,13]. On the other hand, the cavitation phenomenon involves the formation of vapor-filled cavities secondary to the abrupt and rapid changes of pressure in a liquid. The input coming from a high-pressure source causes collapse of these cavities and generates a shock wave, which propagates in the tissue. In turn, the shock wave causes cell detachment from the substrate and significant changes in focal adhesion and biomechanics, ultimately inducing a mechanical cut on the mineralized tissue [14,15,16,17].
In piezoelectric surgery, the changes of pressure are generated by a spatial deformation of the piezoelectric crystals when they are subject to an electric field having a given ultrasonic frequency. This mechanism is also called indirect piezo effect [4,15,18,19]. The resulting oscillations are then amplified and transferred onto an instrument tip. Piezoelectric osteotomy is also considered as a “heat-free” technique.
In fact, although the cavitation effects can increase the temperature of the neighboring tissues, the dissipation of the heat coming from the concomitant irrigation practically leads to the avoidance of any thermal injury. It also promotes the absence of blood and debris in the surgical field [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,20].
All of these aspects made piezoelectric surgery an attractive option, in comparison with common rotating instruments, for human and veterinary procedures, everything in the context of the ongoing biotechnological revolution which has involved especially neurosurgery [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
However, the literature counts still few studies about its potential implication and safety in routinely clinical practice.
The purpose of this study is to report the overall results of a consecutive retrospective veterinary series where piezoelectric surgery was employed for neurosurgical procedures. Physical and technical principles, as well as outcomes, are reported.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study was approved by the internal Institutional Review Board.
Overall data of a consecutive surgical series of patients who underwent a surgical procedure executed with the piezoelectric bone scalpel (Mectron Piezosurgery, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) were retrospectively reviewed.
Inclusion criteria involved dogs and cats which required a neurosurgical procedure comprehending a spinal or skull osteotomy because of a traumatic, degenerative, or neoplastic lesion. Animals older than 10 year of age or harboring more than a single neurosurgical pathology were excluded.
In all spinal cases, the patients underwent to a ventro-dorsal and latero-lateral projection X-ray. A spinal computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were proposed in all cases but performed only in those where the owner was available. Conversely, a CT scan was instead mandatory in all cranial cases. Images were reviewed and edited on a DICOM imaging workstation (Osirix DICOM Viewer@, Pixmeo, Bernex, Switzerland), which also allowed some measurements.
In spinal cases, X-ray and CT scan were both aimed to study the bony component of the pathology. A 3D rendering of the spinal CT scan was also performed, in all cases, to study in more detail the site and cause of compression. In cranial cases, the 3D CT scan allowed us to better localize the lesion. MRI was paramount to study the neurovascular anatomical structures and soft tissues.
All surgeries were performed by the senior surgeon (A.C.). The anesthesia protocol involved the administration of acepromazine 0.005 mg/kg and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) IM for premedication, propofol 4–5 mg/kg IV for induction, and isoflurane-O2 and fentanyl infusion (0.002–0.005 mg/kg/h) for maintenance.
The piezoelectric device consisted of a power unit connected to an ergonomic piezoelectric hand-piece (Figure 1a), an integrated irrigation peristaltic module, and different specifically designed titanium nitride coated tips of various shapes (Figure 1b–d). Frequency modulation ranged between 25 and 30 KHz with linear microvibrations between 60 and 120 μm. The instrument’s power was based on specific presets varying on the basis of the tissue density. The presets ranged between 2.8 and 16 W. The irrigation pump was set to continuously deliver 30 mL/min of saline solution in all cases, regardless of the power setting. The irrigation rate of 30 mL/min was arbitrarily decided on the basis of the balance between the cooling effect and a clear vision of the surgical field during the bony work.
Efficacy and precision of the osteotomies, as well as the ability to spare the underlying soft tissues and neurovascular structures, were intraoperatively evaluated in all surgeries, by two different surgeons.
In order to have a rough idea about the invasiveness of the piezoelectric cut, average blood loss was measured in all animals. The blood loss was calculated as the difference between the known amount of irrigation liquids attached to the peristaltic pump, and those present in the suction receptacles. An ANOVA test was performed between the three different classes of dogs and cats, namely large, medium-sized, and small ones. The p-value was set at <0.05.
However, because of the irrigation, this was assumed to be a broad evaluation of the real loss.
Postoperatively, as a rule, all the animals operated on for a skull pathology underwent a CT scan.
Regarding the spinal cases, an X-ray in both the projections was performed by default at a six-month follow-up, completed with a CT scan where the owner was available. Nevertheless, further imaging evaluations were decided on a case-by-case basis, according to the treated pathology.
The linearity and precision of osteotomies, and the incidence of osteosclerosis and bone resorption in the adjacent segments, were evaluated on imaging studies by two different surgeons.
The criteria adopted to objectively evaluate the long-term incidence of osteosclerosis and bone resorption at the level of the cut surfaces were derived by a modification of that reported by Bolm-Audorff and colleagues for the lumbar spine [37]. In particular, both on X-ray and CT scan, we considered as osteosclerotic at cut surfaces where the thickness of cortical bone extended into the cancellous bone by >2 mm.
A hematoxylin–eosin histological study of the bony specimens was carried out in all cases, to evaluate the presence of osteocytes, osteoblasts, and bone extra-cellular matrix at the osteotomized surface. In 17 cases of paraplegic or tetraplegic animals, where the owner asked for euthanasia, a postmortem harvesting of the spinal cord allowed us to evaluate the presence of mechanical or thermal damages to the nervous tissue and meninges.

3. Results

A total of 292 dogs and 32 cats were included in the study.
The number of large, medium-sized, and small dogs was 97, 121, and 74, respectively. In the cats’ group, 9, 19, and 4 were large, medium-sized, and small breeds. The average age of dogs was 6 ± 1.41, whereas mean age in cats was 6.6 ± 6. The male/female ratio was 2.8 for dogs and 0.7 for cats.
The number of craniotomies and laminectomy/hemilaminectomy was 4 and 305, respectively. In the laminectomy/hemilaminectomy group, T11-L3 level was increased in 92% of cases. Fifteen were the ventral slots, and C5-C7 segment was involved in 94% of cases. Table 1 reports a complete spectrum of data about the neurosurgical procedures performed with the piezoelectric bone scalpel (Table 1).
In all surgeries, the edges of cuts were sharp and extremely precise. In several cases, the piezoelectric scalpel allowed us to achieve curved micrometric cuts that are otherwise difficult to be obtained by means of rotating instruments or saws. Moreover, in some spinal cases, the piezo scalpel was useful to perform the undercutting of the lateral aspect of the lamina without damaging the exposed dura.
The operative field resulted in being free from blood and debris in all cases, thus facilitating a fast and safe recognition of all neighboring and underlying anatomical structures. Continuous irrigation and the thin and sharp profile of the different instruments’ tips and inserts allowed us to perform accurate and blood-free osteotomies, also in deep and difficult-to-access fields. No signs of overheating were observed on soft tissues or underlying neurovascular structures. Average blood loss was 51.6 mL in dogs and 25 mL in cats, respectively. However, no differences in blood loss were found between the large, medium, and small size in dogs and cats.
Table 2 and Table 3 report the average blood loss in dogs and cats, respectively.
Being the piezoelectric surgery based on the physical principle of the indirect piezo effect and cavitation, its efficacy was practically the same in dogs’ and cats’ laminectomies, regardless of the obvious differences in the thickness of the lamina. On the contrary, the length of the cutting tip may vary in dogs’ and cats’ groups.
A rapid learning curve about the use of the piezoelectric scalpel, characterized by a significant improvement of the confidence and dexterity with the instrument, was noted already after the firsts twenty treated cases. Table 4 reports the duration of the surgical procedures (Table 4).
In two trauma cases, in the dogs’ group, a mechanical damage attributable to the use of the piezoelectric bone scalpel was observed (0.6%). They consisted in a dural tear and an epidural hematoma.
Apart from an X-ray, a CT scan and MRI were performed postoperatively in 26 and 4 specific cases, respectively, where the animals underwent surgery because of a spinal traumatic or degenerative pathology.
The histologic study on bony specimens at the osteotomized surface showed the presence of live osteocytes and osteoblasts in 92% of cases (Figure 2). Harvested spinal cord in 17 postmortem cases allowed to appreciate the anatomical integrity of both the dura and the neural tissue (Figure 3).

3.1. Illustrative Cases

3.1.1. Case N° 1

Dog, male, nine years old, 40 kg, diagnosed with a lumbosacral stenosis on epidurography. He underwent a L7-S1 laminectomy by means of the piezoelectric bone scalpel. The procedure was fast and bloodless, and a wide and clear-cut decompressive laminectomy with a complete sparing of the underlying dura was performed (Figure 4). Two weeks after surgery, the walk significantly improved.

3.1.2. Case N° 2

Dog, female, four years old, 0.8 kg, paraplegic, diagnosed with a T13-L1 fracture-luxation with hyperkyphosis secondary to a road accident. The dog underwent a thoracic laminectomy with a monolateral vertebral stabilization T13-L1 with plate and screws (Figure 5). By the six-month follow-up, the dog had partially recovered.

3.1.3. Case N° 3

Dog, female, crossbreed, six years old, 14 kg, who suffered from seizures due to a suspected left intracranial parietal meningioma. She underwent a lateral rostro tentorial craniotomy with the piezoelectric bone scalpel. No dura mater sinus was present. The scalpel was essential in sparing the underling dura and brain. The tumor was completely removed, and recovery was complete, without complications (Figure 6).

3.1.4. Case N° 4

Dachshund, female, seven years old, 8 kg, suffering from a progressive tetraplegia due to a cervical disk extrusion involving the C2-C3 space.
The dog underwent a ventral slot decompression by means of the piezoelectric bone scalpel with a curved long insert, which resulted in being very helpful, considering the depth of the surgical field compared to the dorsal approach (Figure 7). Two week later, the motor deficits significantly improved, and no signs of instability were documented.

3.1.5. Case N° 5

Cat, male, three years old, 3 kg. Firearm trauma with a secondary spinal cord compression due to a retained lead shot. The cat was paraplegic. He underwent to a laminectomy and spinal cord decompression by means of the piezoelectric bone scalpel, where, once again, it was possible to spare completely the spinal cord (Figure 8). Recovery was very fast, without complications.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study confirmed the reliability, effectiveness, safety, and minimal invasiveness of the piezoelectric osteotomy in veterinary neurosurgical procedures.
The physical principle of cavitation, at the base of the piezoelectric osteotomy, consists in the formation of vapor-filled bubbles generated by abrupt pressure changes of a liquid molecules. The subsequent collapse of these bubbles originates an energetic input which is transformed into a shock wave able to break the mineralized tissue [14,15,16,17,38,39].
Piezoelectric osteotomy differs itself from other techniques mainly for its micrometric and selective cut on the mineralized tissues, but also for allowing a heat-free and blood-free operating site. Piezoelectric cut is realized by mechanical vibrations in a range between 60 and 210 μm with a frequency of 29.000 times per second, thus obtaining an efficacy that, although slightly inferior to that of bone saws or burs, has been reported to not increase the overall duration of surgery [18,40,41,42].
The microscopic feature of the cut gives a high precision, which is paramount in several deep-seated surgical sites. About the selectivity, piezoelectric hand-piece produces microvibrations at a low frequency ultrasonic waves of 22–30 Hz. At this order of frequency, soft tissues and neurovascular structures are spared.
About the power of the instrument, some presets are available, mainly varying according to the density of the tissue. As a rule, the greater the consistence of the tissue is, the greater the power required. The bone preset involved a power of 16 W and an average frequency of 30 KHz, as reported in the illustrative case 1.
Intra-operative irrigation is also subject to ultrasonic microvibrations, with these causing the breaking up of the liquid into very small particles. Liquid particles produce an excellent cooling of the bony surface, also making the operating site blood-free. Several studies have already confirmed the safety of piezosurgery [13,21,43,44,45].
Stelzle and Vercellotti reported that a key aspect related to the correct use of the instrument is the pressure load applied on the tip, with it largely affecting the overall efficacy and safety of the procedure.
They and other authors reported that an excessive pressure load prevents microvibrations of the insert, and the total amount of energy not employed for cutting is converted into heat, ultimately leading to damage the soft tissues and neurovascular structures [13,18,40,46]. As a consequence, irrigation is essential for leading to the cavitation phenomenon and, at the same time, avoiding dangerous overheating.
The cutting lines varied in shape, and, as reported in the Results, the piezoelectric scalpel allowed us to perform curved micrometric cuts, which were very useful in different surgical scenarios. About the inserts, the OT7 ones, characterized by an angled large saw tip, are recommended for coarse osteotomies. They are available in two different lengths, 10 and 20 mm, to be chosen on the basis of the depth of the bone. As a rule, the longest one is suitable for ventral slots, as reported in the illustrative Case 4, or also lumbosacral laminectomy. The tips have some landmarks on their lateral surface that act as depth meter. The thickness of the tips is 0.55 and 0.6 mm for the short and long one, respectively. In our experience, OT2 insert has been useful in high-precision osteotomies thanks to a 3 mm length sharp tip.
We found all the presets and working protocols to be suitable for most of the osteotomies.
The present study was conducted on dogs and cats affected by skull and spinal pathologies. This aspect allowed us to test the effectiveness, invasiveness, and safety of the instrument, especially in laminectomies and craniotomies. The precision and safety of the piezoelectric cut resulted in being particularly useful for hemilaminectomies, laminectomies, and craniotomies, where it was possible to protect the underlying dura, thus avoiding iatrogenic trauma. Nevertheless, a subperiosteal skeletonization is of the utmost importance in achieving the best performance of the scalpel in cutting the bone.
The two complications reported in the present series, namely a dural tear and an epidural hematoma, were both attributable to an accidental slippage of the instrument, with a consequent mechanical damage caused by the tip of the scalpel. Avoiding placing an excessive pressure on the instrument handpiece is important, also, to avoid these potential complications.
About the differences between dogs and cats, it should be stressed that we noted no differences in terms of efficacy of the cut. This aspect is attributable to the fact that piezoelectric surgery is based on the physical principles of indirect piezo effect and cavitation, which are both independent by the different thickness of the lamina in the two groups.
All the aforementioned aspects make piezosurgery a very good tool for most of the complex skull and spinal neurosurgical approaches [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].
Conversely, a known disadvantage of the piezosurgery is that it is time-consuming [1,60,61]. However, in the authors’ experience, the slight increase in the overall operative time was largely counterbalanced by the safety of the technique.
The minimal invasiveness of the piezo cut was also confirmed by the imaging follow-up, where the incidence of the osteosclerosis and bone resorption at the osteotomized surfaces was negligible (Figure 9a,b).
In the present study, whose major strength lies in the high number of treated cases, the non-aggressiveness and safety of the piezoelectric bone scalpel were also confirmed by the histology, which showed the absence of necrosis along with vitality of the osteocytes and osteoblasts. Similar results have been reported in the literature [62,63,64,65,66,67]. Piezosurgery has also been reported to interfere to a lesser extent than drills with the initial phases of the bone healing, mainly because it stimulates the bone morphogenetic proteins. A better control of iatrogenic inflammatory processes, along with the stimulation of bone remodeling has been also demonstrated [68,69,70,71,72,73].
The good outcomes reported in the present study allow us to consider the piezoelectric bone scalpel as a useful tool to be integrated into the neurosurgical armamentarium of the minimal invasive techniques [74,75,76,77,78].

5. Conclusions

The piezoelectric cut can be considered a minimal invasive osteotomy technique.
In our experience, it has proven to be precise, effective, and safe in veterinary craniotomies and laminectomies.
Its main strength lies in the ability to spare the soft tissues and neurovascular structures, being moreover free from the risk of thermal injury.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.C. and S.L.; methodology, A.M.C. and S.L.; writing—original and draft preparation, A.M.C. and S.L.; software and validation, A.G.L.; validation, T.V.; review and editing, G.F., L.L., and A.C.; supervision, T.V. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Eng. Giorgia Di Giusto for her outstanding and valuable help in formatting the manuscript and figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eggers, G.; Klein, J.; Blank, J.; Hassfeld, S. Piezosurgery: An ultrasound device for cutting bone and its use and limitations in maxillofacial surgery. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2004, 42, 451–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Salami, A.; Mora, R.; Mora, F.; Guastini, L.; Salzano, F.A.; Dellepiane, M. Learning curve for Piezosurgery in well-trained otological surgeons. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010, 142, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vercellotti, T.; Pollack, A.S. A new bone surgery device: Sinus grafting and periodontal surgery. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2006, 27, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Tepedino, M.; Romano, F.; Indolfi, M.; Aimetti, M. Heat Production and Drill Wear Following Osseous Resective Surgery: A Preliminary in Vitro SEM Study Comparing Piezosurgery and Conventional Drilling. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2018, 38, e33–e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Delgado-Ruiz, R.A.; Sacks, D.; Palermo, A.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; Perez-Albacete, C.; Romanos, G.E. Temperature and time variations during osteotomies perforMed. with different piezosurgical devices: An in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2016, 27, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vercellotti, T.; Palermo, A.; Molfetta, L. The Piezoelectric Osteotomy in Orthopaedics: Clinical and Histological Evaluations (Pilot Study in Animals). Mediterr. J. Surg. Med. 2001, 9, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farrell, M.; Solano, M.A.; Fitzpatrick, N.; Jovanovik, J. Use of an ex vivo canine ventral slot model to test the efficacy of a piezoelectric cutting tool for decompressive spinal surgery. Vet. Surg. 2013, 42, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hennet, P. Piezoelectric Bone Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Potential Applications in Veterinary Oromaxillofacial Surgery. Front. Vet. Sci. 2015, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bengazi, F.; Lang, N.P.; Canciani, E.; Viganò, P.; Velez, J.U.; Botticelli, D. Osseointegration of implants with dendrimers surface characteristics installed conventionally or with Piezosurgery®. A comparative study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014, 25, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gyo, K.; Sato, H.; Yumoto, E.; Yanagihara, N. Assessment of stapes mobility by use of a newly developed piezoelectric ceramic device. A preliminary experiment in dogs. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2000, 109, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stoll, H.P.; Kopper, B.; Ziegler, M.; Oberhausen, E. Nuclear medicine assessment of renal function in beagles before and after extracorporeal percutaneous lithotripsy with a piezoelectric instrument system. Urol. A 1987, 26, 222–228. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harder, S.; Wolfart, S.; Mehl, C.; Kern, M. Performance of ultrasonic devices for bone surgery and associated intraosseous temperature development. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2009, 24, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Vercellotti, T.; De Paoli, S.; Nevins, M. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: Introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2001, 21, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  14. Crosetti, E.; Battiston, B.; Succo, G. Piezosurgery in head and neck oncological and reconstructive surgery: Personal experience on 127 cases. Acta OtorhinoLaryngol. Ital. 2009, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schlee, M.; Steigmann, M.; Bratu, E.; Garg, A.K. Piezosurgery: Basics and possibilities. Implant Dent. 2006, 15, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. d’Agostino, M.C.; Craig, K.; Tibalt, E.; Respizzi, S. Shock wave as biological therapeutic tool: From mechanical stimulation to recovery and healing, through mechanotransduction. Int. J. Surg. 2015, 24, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brennen, C.E. Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vercellotti, T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol. 2004, 53, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  19. Katzir, S. The Discovery of the Piezoelectric Effect. Granul. Matter 2003, 57, 61–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fugito, K., Jr.; Cortes, A.R.; de Carvalho Destro, R.; Yoshimoto, M. Comparative Study on the Cutting Effectiveness and Heat Generation of Rotary Instruments versus Piezoelectric Surgery Tips Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Thermal Analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2018, 33, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pavlikova, G.; Foltan, R.; Burian, M.; Horka, E.; Adamek, S.; Hejcl, A.; Hanzelka, T.; Sedy, J. Piezosurgery prevents brain tissue damage: An experimental study on a new rat model. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 40, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schaller, B.J.; Gruber, R.; Merten, H.A.; Kruschat, T.; Schliephake, H.; Buchfelder, M.; Ludwig, H.C. Piezoelectric bone surgery: A revolutionary technique for minimally invasive surgery in cranial base and spinal surgery? Technical note. Neurosurgery 2005, 57, E410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Raysi Dehcordi, S.; Ricci, A.; Di Vitantonio, H.; De Paulis, D.; Luzzi, S.; Palumbo, P.; Cinque, B.; Tempesta, D.; Coletti, G.; Cipolloni, G.; et al. Stemness Marker Detection in the Periphery of Glioblastoma and Ability of Glioblastoma to Generate Glioma Stem Cells: Clinical Correlations. World NeuroSurg. 2017, 105, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cheng, C.Y.; Shetty, R.; Sekhar, L.N. Microsurgical Resection of a Large Intraventricular Trigonal Tumor: 3-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper. NeuroSurg. 2018, 15, E92–E93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luzzi, S.; Crovace, A.M.; Lacitignola, L.; Valentini, V.; Francioso, E.; Rossi, G.; Invernici, G.; Galzio, R.J.; Crovace, A. Engraftment, neuroglial transdifferentiation and behavioral recovery after complete spinal cord transection in rats. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2018, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palumbo, P.; Lombardi, F.; Siragusa, G.; Dehcordi, S.R.; Luzzi, S.; Cimini, A.; Cifone, M.G.; Cinque, B. Involvement of NOS2 Activity on Human Glioma Cell Growth, Clonogenic Potential, and Neurosphere Generation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zoia, C.; Bongetta, D.; Guerrini, F.; Alicino, C.; Cattalani, A.; Bianchini, S.; Galzio, R.J.; Luzzi, S. Outcome of elderly patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection: A single center experience. J. NeuroSurg. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bellantoni, G.; Guerrini, F.; Del Maestro, M.; Galzio, R.; Luzzi, S. Simple schwannomatosis or an incomplete Coffin-Siris? Report of a particular case. eNeurologicalSci. 2019, 14, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luzzi, S.; Crovace, A.M.; Del Maestro, M.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Cinque, B.; Palumbo, P.; Lombardi, F.; Cimini, A.; Cifone, M.G.; et al. The cell-based approach in neurosurgery: Ongoing trends and future perspectives. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luzzi, S.; Elia, A.; Del Maestro, M.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Carnevale, S.; Guerrini, F.; Caulo, M.; Morbini, P.; Galzio, R. Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumors: What You Need to Know. World NeuroSurg. 2019, 127, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luzzi, S.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Del Maestro, M.; Marfia, G.; Navone, S.E.; Baldoncini, M.; Nunez, M.; Campero, A.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Galzio, R. Anterolateral Approach for Retrostyloid Superior Parapharyngeal Space Schwannomas Involving the Jugular Foramen Area: A 20-Year Experience. World NeuroSurg. 2019, 132, e40–e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Palumbo, P.; Lombardi, F.; Augello, F.R.; Giusti, I.; Luzzi, S.; Dolo, V.; Cifone, M.G.; Cinque, B. NOS2 inhibitor 1400W Induces Autophagic Flux and Influences Extracellular Vesicle Profile in Human Glioblastoma U87MG Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Spena, G.; Roca, E.; Guerrini, F.; Panciani, P.P.; Stanzani, L.; Salmaggi, A.; Luzzi, S.; Fontanella, M. Risk factors for intraoperative stimulation-related seizuRes. during awake surgery: An analysis of 109 consecutive patients. J. Neurooncol. 2019, 145, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Antonosante, A.; Brandolini, L.; d’Angelo, M.; Benedetti, E.; Castelli, V.; Maestro, M.D.; Luzzi, S.; Giordano, A.; Cimini, A.; Allegretti, M. Autocrine CXCL8-depenDent. invasiveness triggers modulation of actin cytoskeletal network and cell dynamics. Aging 2020, 12, 1928–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Campanella, R.; Guarnaccia, L.; Cordiglieri, C.; Trombetta, E.; Caroli, M.; Carrabba, G.; La Verde, N.; Rampini, P.; Gaudino, C.; Costa, A.; et al. Tumor-Educated Platelets and Angiogenesis in Glioblastoma: Another Brick in the Wall for Novel Prognostic and Targetable Biomarkers, Changing the Vision from a Localized Tumor to a Systemic Pathology. Cells 2020, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zoia, C.; Lombardi, F.; Fiore, M.R.; Montalbetti, A.; Iannalfi, A.; Sansone, M.; Bongetta, D.; Valvo, F.; Del Maestro, M.; Luzzi, S.; et al. Sacral solitary fibrous tumour: Surgery and hadrontherapy, a combined treatment strategy. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2020, 25, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bolm-Audorff, U.; Brandenburg, S.; Brüning, T.; Dupuis, H.; Ellegast, R.; Elsner, G.; Franz, K.; Grasshoff, H.; Grosser, V.; Hanisch, L.; et al. Medizinische Beurteilungskriterien zu bandscheibenbedingten Berufskrankheiten der Lendenwirbelsäule (I). Trauma Berufskrankh. 2005, 7, 211–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gonzalez-Garcia, A.; Diniz-Freitas, M.; Somoza-Martin, M.; Garcia-Garcia, A. Ultrasonic osteotomy in oral surgery and implantology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009, 108, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Labanca, M.; Azzola, F.; Vinci, R.; Rodella, L.F. Piezoelectric surgery: Twenty years of use. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2008, 46, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vercellotti, T.; Nevins, M.L.; Kim, D.M.; Nevins, M.; Wada, K.; Schenk, R.K.; Fiorellini, J.P. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2005, 25, 543–549. [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomas, M.; Akula, U.; Ealla, K.K.; Gajjada, N. Piezosurgery: A Boon for Modern Periodontics. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Agarwal, E.; Masamatti, S.S.; Kumar, A. Escalating role of piezosurgery in dental therapeutics. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, Ze08–Ze11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aimetti, M.; Ferrarotti, F.; Bergandi, L.; Saksing, L.; Parducci, F.; Romano, F. Increase in Periodontal Interleukin-1beta Gene Expression Following Osseous Resective Surgery Using Conventional Rotary Instruments Compared with Piezosurgery: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2016, 36, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Salami, A.; Mora, R.; Dellepiane, M.; Crippa, B.; Santomauro, V.; Guastini, L. Piezosurgery versus microdrill in intact canal wall mastoidectomy. Eur. Arch. OtorhinoLaryngol. 2010, 267, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salami, A.; Vercellotti, T.; Mora, R.; Dellepiane, M. Piezoelectric bone surgery in otologic surgery. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2007, 136, 484–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Stelzle, F.; Frenkel, C.; Riemann, M.; Knipfer, C.; Stockmann, P.; Nkenke, E. The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation—An experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014, 25, e140–e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Del Maestro, M.; Luzzi, S.; Gallieni, M.; Trovarelli, D.; Giordano, A.V.; Gallucci, M.; Ricci, A.; Galzio, R. Surgical Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations: Role of Preoperative Staged Embolization. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2018, 129, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gallieni, M.; Del Maestro, M.; Luzzi, S.; Trovarelli, D.; Ricci, A.; Galzio, R. Endoscope-Assisted Microneurosurgery for Intracranial Aneurysms: Operative Technique, Reliability, and Feasibility Based on 14 Years of Personal Experience. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2018, 129, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Luzzi, S.; Del Maestro, M.; Bongetta, D.; Zoia, C.; Giordano, A.V.; Trovarelli, D.; Raysi Dehcordi, S.; Galzio, R.J. Onyx Embolization before the Surgical Treatment of Grade III Spetzler-Martin Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Single-Center Experience and Technical Nuances. World NeuroSurg. 2018, 116, e340–e353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luzzi, S.; Del Maestro, M.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Galzio, R. Letter to the Editor Regarding “One and Done: Multimodal Treatment of Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations in a Single Anesthesia Event”. World NeuroSurg. 2020, 134, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Luzzi, S.; Del Maestro, M.; Galzio, R. Letter to the Editor. Preoperative embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations. J. NeuroSurg. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luzzi, S.; Elia, A.; Del Maestro, M.; Morotti, A.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Cavallini, A.; Galzio, R. Indication, Timing, and Surgical Treatment of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Proposal of a Management Algorithm. World NeuroSurg. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Luzzi, S.; Gallieni, M.; Del Maestro, M.; Trovarelli, D.; Ricci, A.; Galzio, R. Giant and Very Large Intracranial Aneurysms: Surgical Strategies and Special Issues. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2018, 129, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ricci, A.; Di Vitantonio, H.; De Paulis, D.; Del Maestro, M.; Raysi, S.D.; Murrone, D.; Luzzi, S.; Galzio, R.J. Cortical aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery: A review of the literature. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2017, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Millimaggi, D.F.; Norcia, V.D.; Luzzi, S.; Alfiero, T.; Galzio, R.J.; Ricci, A. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbosacral Spine Degenerative Diseases. A Retrospective Database of 40 Consecutive Cases and Literature Review. Turk. NeuroSurg. 2018, 28, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bongetta, D.; Zoia, C.; Luzzi, S.; Maestro, M.D.; Peri, A.; Bichisao, G.; Sportiello, D.; Canavero, I.; Pietrabissa, A.; Galzio, R.J. Neurosurgical issues of bariatric surgery: A systematic review of the literature and principles of diagnosis and treatment. Clin. Neurol. NeuroSurg. 2019, 176, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Elsawaf, Y.; Anetsberger, S.; Luzzi, S.; Elbabaa, S.K. Early Decompressive Craniectomy as Management for Severe TBI in the Pediatric Population: A Comprehensive Literature Review. World NeuroSurg. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pisano, P.; Guerrini, F.; Custodi, V.; Del Maestro, M.; Galzio, R.; Luzzi, S. Tonic-clonic seizures as a possible complication for cerebrospinal fluid leakage after intradural spinal surgery, a case report. Interdiscip. Neurosurg. Adv. Tech. Case Manag. 2020, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Savioli, G.; Ceresa, I.F.; Macedonio, S.; Gerosa, S.; Belliato, M.; Iotti, G.A.; Luzzi, S.; Del Maestro, M.; Mezzini, G.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; et al. Trauma Coagulopathy and Its Outcomes. Medicina 2020, 56, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Arun, D.; Jain, G.; Bansal, T. Piezosurgery in dentistry. J. Oral Res. Rev. 2016, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goyal, M.; Marya, K.; Jhamb, A.; Chawla, S.; Sonoo, P.R.; Singh, V.; Aggarwal, A. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: A prospective study. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 50, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Otake, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Henmi, A.; Takahashi, T.; Sasano, Y. Experimental Comparison of the Performance of Cutting Bone and Soft Tissue between Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Grauvogel, J.; Scheiwe, C.; Masalha, W.; Jarc, N.; Grauvogel, T.; Beringer, A. Piezosurgery in Modified Pterional OrbItal. Decompression Surgery in Graves Disease. World NeuroSurg. 2017, 106, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, X.; Li, T.; Shi, L.; Wu, Z.; Chen, D.; Xu, B.; Chen, Y. Application of Piezosurgery in En Bloc Laminectomy for the Treatment of Multilevel Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum. World NeuroSurg. 2019, 126, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Grauvogel, J.; Masalha, W.; Heiland, D.H.; Jarc, N.; Grauvogel, T.D.; Scheiwe, C. Piezosurgery—A Safe Technique to Perform Lateral SuboccipItal. Craniotomy? Oper. NeuroSurg. 2018, 15, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grauvogel, J.; Scheiwe, C.; Kaminsky, J. Use of Piezosurgery for removal of retrovertebral body osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy. Spine J. 2014, 14, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pan, S.F.; Sun, Y. Application of Piezosurgery in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion. Orthop. Surg. 2016, 8, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chiriac, G.; Herten, M.; Schwarz, F.; Rothamel, D.; Becker, J. Autogenous bone chips: Influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2005, 32, 994–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Happe, A. Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: Report of 40 cases. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2007, 27, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  70. Horton, J.E.; Tarpley, T.M., Jr.; Wood, L.D. The healing of surgical defects in alveolar bone produced with ultrasonic instrumentation, chisel, and rotary bur. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1975, 39, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lakshmiganthan, M.; Gokulanathan, S.; Shanmugasundaram, N.; Daniel, R.; Ramesh, S.B. Piezosurgical osteotomy for harvesting intraoral block bone graft. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2012, 4, S165–S168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Preti, G.; Martinasso, G.; Peirone, B.; Navone, R.; Manzella, C.; Muzio, G.; Russo, C.; Canuto, R.A.; Schierano, G. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: A pilot study in minipigs. J. Periodontol. 2007, 78, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Rashad, A.; Sadr-Eshkevari, P.; Weuster, M.; Schmitz, I.; Prochnow, N.; Maurer, P. Material attrition and bone micromorphology after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013, 24 (Suppl. A100), 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Luzzi, S.; Del Maestro, M.; Trovarelli, D.; De Paulis, D.; Dechordi, S.R.; Di Vitantonio, H.; Di Norcia, V.; Millimaggi, D.F.; Ricci, A.; Galzio, R.J. Endoscope-Assisted Microneurosurgery for Neurovascular Compression Syndromes: Basic Principles, Methodology, and Technical Notes. Asian J. NeuroSurg. 2019, 14, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Luzzi, S.; Maestro, M.D.; Elia, A.; Vincitorio, F.; Perna, G.D.; Zenga, F.; Garbossa, D.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Galzio, R. Morphometric and Radiomorphometric Study of the Correlation Between the Foramen Magnum Region and the Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches to Ventral Intradural Lesions. Turk. NeuroSurg. 2019, 29, 875–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Luzzi, S.; Zoia, C.; Rampini, A.D.; Elia, A.; Del Maestro, M.; Carnevale, S.; Morbini, P.; Galzio, R. Lateral TransorbItal. Neuroendoscopic Approach for Intraconal Meningioma of the OrbItal. Apex: Technical Nuances and Literature Review. World NeuroSurg. 2019, 131, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zoia, C.; Bongetta, D.; Dorelli, G.; Luzzi, S.; Maestro, M.D.; Galzio, R.J. Transnasal endoscopic removal of a retrochiasmatic cavernoma: A case report and review of literature. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2019, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Arnaout, M.M.; Luzzi, S.; Galzio, R.; Aziz, K. SupraorbItal. keyhole approach: Pure endoscopic and endoscope-assisted perspective. Clin. Neurol. NeuroSurg. 2020, 189, 105623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vetsci 07 00068 g001 550
Figure 1. Mectron Piezosurgery® bone scalpel. Power unit, hand-piece, and irrigation peristaltic module (a). Sets of tips (b–d).
Figure 1. Mectron Piezosurgery® bone scalpel. Power unit, hand-piece, and irrigation peristaltic module (a). Sets of tips (b–d).
Vetsci 07 00068 g001
Vetsci 07 00068 g002 550
Figure 2. Histologic study executed on a dog’s bone specimen. Hematoxylin–eosin 2.5X (a) and 10X (b), showing the presence of live osteocytes and osteoblasts near the osteotomized surface (arrowheads).
Figure 2. Histologic study executed on a dog’s bone specimen. Hematoxylin–eosin 2.5X (a) and 10X (b), showing the presence of live osteocytes and osteoblasts near the osteotomized surface (arrowheads).
Vetsci 07 00068 g002
Vetsci 07 00068 g003 550
Figure 3. Histologic study executed on a cat’s spinal cord. Hematoxylin–eosin 2.5X, showing the perfect anatomical integrity of the spinal cord and dura after piezoelectric osteotomy (a,b).
Figure 3. Histologic study executed on a cat’s spinal cord. Hematoxylin–eosin 2.5X, showing the perfect anatomical integrity of the spinal cord and dura after piezoelectric osteotomy (a,b).
Vetsci 07 00068 g003
Vetsci 07 00068 g004 550
Figure 4. Dog, nine years old, diagnosed with a lumbosacral stenosis. (a) Epidurography showing a severe stenosis. (b) Skeletonization of the lumbosacral segment. Note the incision of the last lumbar and first sacral vertebra, along with the possibility of a further lateral extension (c) lumbar laminectomy. The thickness of the lamina measures 12 mm. Laminectomy was performed by means of the piezoelectric bone scalpel. An angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) was used. The bone preset involved a frequency of 30 KHz and a power of 16 W. A complete sparing of the underlying dura was observed after the osteotomy. OT7 designated tip also allowed to wide laterally the osteotomy in an easy way after and the dura exposure. Note that this tip allows cuts up to 15 mm of depth.
Figure 4. Dog, nine years old, diagnosed with a lumbosacral stenosis. (a) Epidurography showing a severe stenosis. (b) Skeletonization of the lumbosacral segment. Note the incision of the last lumbar and first sacral vertebra, along with the possibility of a further lateral extension (c) lumbar laminectomy. The thickness of the lamina measures 12 mm. Laminectomy was performed by means of the piezoelectric bone scalpel. An angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) was used. The bone preset involved a frequency of 30 KHz and a power of 16 W. A complete sparing of the underlying dura was observed after the osteotomy. OT7 designated tip also allowed to wide laterally the osteotomy in an easy way after and the dura exposure. Note that this tip allows cuts up to 15 mm of depth.
Vetsci 07 00068 g004
Vetsci 07 00068 g005 550
Figure 5. X-ray showing a T13-L1 fracture with hyperkyphosis in a paraplegic dog (a). A safe thoracic piezoelectric laminectomy was obtained with an angled sharp tip (OT2, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) piezoelectric bone scalpel (b). Dorsal monolateral vertebral stabilization T13-L1 with plate and screws. Noteworthy, piezoelectric scalpel with a different straight tip was used as tapper for the screws placement (c).
Figure 5. X-ray showing a T13-L1 fracture with hyperkyphosis in a paraplegic dog (a). A safe thoracic piezoelectric laminectomy was obtained with an angled sharp tip (OT2, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) piezoelectric bone scalpel (b). Dorsal monolateral vertebral stabilization T13-L1 with plate and screws. Noteworthy, piezoelectric scalpel with a different straight tip was used as tapper for the screws placement (c).
Vetsci 07 00068 g005
Vetsci 07 00068 g006a 550Vetsci 07 00068 g006b 550
Figure 6. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan, showing a suspected left parietal meningioma (a). Intraoperative pictures showing the initial steps of the craniotomy (b). The bone flap was cut with piezoelectric scalpel and an angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (c,d). The dura was completely preserved (e). En bloc removal of meningioma (f). Postoperative CT scan performed at six-month follow-up, showing the sharpness of the edges of the craniotomy. No osteosclerosis or bony resorption was evident (g).
Figure 6. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan, showing a suspected left parietal meningioma (a). Intraoperative pictures showing the initial steps of the craniotomy (b). The bone flap was cut with piezoelectric scalpel and an angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (c,d). The dura was completely preserved (e). En bloc removal of meningioma (f). Postoperative CT scan performed at six-month follow-up, showing the sharpness of the edges of the craniotomy. No osteosclerosis or bony resorption was evident (g).
Vetsci 07 00068 g006aVetsci 07 00068 g006b
Vetsci 07 00068 g007 550
Figure 7. Axial (a), coronal (b), sagittal (c), and 3D (d) cervical CT scan showing a C2-C3 disk extrusion in a seven-year-old dachshund suffering from a progressive tetraplegia. Ventral slot decompression was obtained by means of long angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (e).
Figure 7. Axial (a), coronal (b), sagittal (c), and 3D (d) cervical CT scan showing a C2-C3 disk extrusion in a seven-year-old dachshund suffering from a progressive tetraplegia. Ventral slot decompression was obtained by means of long angled large saw tip (OT7, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (e).
Vetsci 07 00068 g007
Vetsci 07 00068 g008 550
Figure 8. X-ray in latero-lateral (a) and ventro-dorsal (b) projection, showing multiple retained lead shots in a cat paraplegic because victim of a firearm trauma. One of the intrathecal lead shots caused a spinal cord contusion and partial compression. A subdural hematoma was also present. Intraoperative pictures showing lumbar spinal cord after decompressive one-level laminectomy performed with piezoelectric scalpel and an angled small saw tip (OT7S-3, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (c,d). Six-months postoperative ventro-dorsal X-ray showing the site of the laminectomy (e).
Figure 8. X-ray in latero-lateral (a) and ventro-dorsal (b) projection, showing multiple retained lead shots in a cat paraplegic because victim of a firearm trauma. One of the intrathecal lead shots caused a spinal cord contusion and partial compression. A subdural hematoma was also present. Intraoperative pictures showing lumbar spinal cord after decompressive one-level laminectomy performed with piezoelectric scalpel and an angled small saw tip (OT7S-3, Osteotomy Tips Kit, Mectron Medical Technology, Genoa, Italy) (c,d). Six-months postoperative ventro-dorsal X-ray showing the site of the laminectomy (e).
Vetsci 07 00068 g008
Vetsci 07 00068 g009 550
Figure 9. Two-dimensional (a) and 3D (b) CT scan of an explicative case of dorsal hemilaminectomy performed in a dachshund diagnosed with a spinal cord compression.
Figure 9. Two-dimensional (a) and 3D (b) CT scan of an explicative case of dorsal hemilaminectomy performed in a dachshund diagnosed with a spinal cord compression.
Vetsci 07 00068 g009
Table
Table 1. Data about neurosurgical procedures performed with the piezoelectric bone scalpel.
Table 1. Data about neurosurgical procedures performed with the piezoelectric bone scalpel.
SitePatientTotal
Dogs (N° 292)Cats (N° 32)
Field of Pathology
TraumaticDegenerative Neoplastic Traumatic
SiteSkull004 (extra-axial)04
SpineCervical 0122012
Thoracic24133040
Thoracolumbar37462473
Lumbar14622078
Lumbosacral743418117
Surgeries (N°)1491251832324
Average blood loss (mL)52475625180
Complications (N°)20103
Table
Table 2. Data about average blood loss according to dogs’ size.
Table 2. Data about average blood loss according to dogs’ size.
SizeDogs (N°)Weight (lbs)Blood Loss (mL)
AverageSdAverageSdANOVA
Large (≥50 lbs)97104.334.351.017.70.32
Medium (21–50 lbs)12135.28.953.316.8
Small (1–20 lbs)7410.46.149.816.4
Table
Table 3. Data about average blood loss according to cats’ size.
Table 3. Data about average blood loss according to cats’ size.
BreedCats (N°)Weight (lbs)Blood Loss (mL)
AverageSdAverageSdANOVA
Large (≥14 lbs)915.31.1256.30.61
Medium (9–13 lbs)1911.51.226.46.4
Small (1–8 lbs)46.51.96.51.9
Table
Table 4. Duration of surgical procedures.
Table 4. Duration of surgical procedures.
SiteDuration of Surgery (Average min)
DogsCats
Skull7267
Cranial Cervical Spine6056
Caudal Cervical Spine4843
Thoracic2016
Thoracolumbar2217
Lumbosacral1714
Lumbar2623

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crovace, A.M.; Luzzi, S.; Lacitignola, L.; Fatone, G.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Vercellotti, T.; Crovace, A. Minimal Invasive Piezoelectric Osteotomy in Neurosurgery: Technic, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective Case Series. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020068

AMA Style

Crovace AM, Luzzi S, Lacitignola L, Fatone G, Giotta Lucifero A, Vercellotti T, Crovace A. Minimal Invasive Piezoelectric Osteotomy in Neurosurgery: Technic, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective Case Series. Veterinary Sciences. 2020; 7(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crovace, Alberto Maria, Sabino Luzzi, Luca Lacitignola, Gerardo Fatone, Alice Giotta Lucifero, Tomaso Vercellotti, and Antonio Crovace. 2020. "Minimal Invasive Piezoelectric Osteotomy in Neurosurgery: Technic, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective Case Series" Veterinary Sciences 7, no. 2: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop