Next Article in Journal
Gastric Hyperplastic Polyp Causing Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Severe Anemia in a Dog
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation on Descriptive Epidemiology, Geographical Distribution, and Genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus s.l. in Bovine from Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Information Provided by Breeders and Referring Veterinarians about the Presence and Meaning of a Murmur to Owners of Newly Purchased Puppies with a Later Confirmed Congenital Heart Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Records of Human Deaths from Echinococcosis in Brazil, 1995–2016
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/vetsci9120679
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Environmental Samples from Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria

by
Emmanuel Jolaoluwa Awosanya
1,*,
Adeola Olagbaju
1,
Angela Peruzzu
2,
Gabriella Masu
2,
Giovanna Masala
2 and
Piero Bonelli
2,*
1
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Nigeria
2
National Reference Laboratory for Cystic Echinococcosis (CeNRE), WOAH Reference Laboratory for Echinococcosis, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna (IZS), Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(12), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120679
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Echinococcosis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The presence of parasite eggs in the environment represents an alarming threat for human health. In particular, the accidental ingestion of tapeworm eggs can cause severe and disabling illness in humans. Cystic Echinococcosis (CE), caused by infection from the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus, gives rise to great concern for its medical and economic burden. CE transmission to humans mostly occurs through the consumption of water or food contaminated by feces of infected dogs. In the present study, we collected soil, fecal and water samples in the city of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, to detect parasite contamination in the environment. We evidenced that the urban and semi-urban areas of Ibadan are highly contaminated with E. granulosus s.l. eggs, emphasising the need for appropriate measures to control CE. These findings suggest that prevention strategies should consider the control of stray dogs, the establishment of deworming programs and the promotion of public education.

Abstract

Environmental contamination with parasite eggs poses a serious risk to public health. This study aimed to assess the presence of taeniid eggs and, in particular, E. granulosus s.l., in environmental samples in the city of Ibadan, South West Nigeria. To this purpose, soil (n = 200), fecal (n = 200) and water samples (n = 50) were examined by microscopic observation and the multiplex PCR method. The influence of specific environmental factors on E. granulosus s.l. egg dispersion was also evaluated. Taeniid eggs were microscopically found in 11.5%, 25.5% and 8.0% of soil, fecal and water samples, respectively. PCR analyses evidenced the presence of E. granulosus s.l. in 8.0%, 24.0% and 2.0% of soil, fecal and water samples, respectively. The proximity to slaughterhouses, the level of urbanisation and the local government area of belonging did not seem to affect E. granulosus s.l. egg dissemination patterns. Our results have clearly demonstrated that both urban and semi-urban areas of the city of Ibadan in Nigeria are highly contaminated by taeniid eggs and we recommend the adoption of appropriate measures to control E. granulosus s.l.

1. Introduction

The larval form of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.) is the cause of cystic echinococcosis (CE) in humans and animals, a zoonotic and neglected tropical disease that is listed second among foodborne illnesses by the World Health Organisation (WHO) [1]. Five different species of E. granulosus s.l. have been identified: Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.), Echinococcus ortleppi, Echinococcus equinus, Echinococcus canadensis and Echinococcus felidis [2]. Among these species, E. granulosus s.s. causes great concern as it is responsible for the vast majority of human CE cases worldwide. E. canadensis contributes to a lesser extent of the global burden of human CE and can become predominant in particular regions [3].
The life cycle of E. granulosus s.l. involves definitive (carnivores) and intermediate hosts (ungulates). The adult worms live in the small intestine of the definitive hosts and produce eggs contained in mature proglottids that are excreted within feces. Intermediate hosts become infected, usually at pasture, by ingesting mature proglottids. Oncospheres released by the eggs develop into metacestode and cause the formation of CE cysts in the internal organs. The completion of the life cycle occurs when the definitive hosts feed on the infected organs of the intermediate hosts [4]. Humans can acquire an infection that acts as dead-end host, as they do not contribute to the parasite’s perpetuation. Domestic dogs have a prominent role in the transmission of E. granulosus infection to humans, either directly or indirectly, through the contamination of soil, water or vegetables [5]. It has been demonstrated that taeniid eggs may remain viable in the natural environment for long periods of time [6], and in particular, E. granulosus eggs maintained their viability and infectiveness for up to 41 months [7]. The large number of E. granulosus proglottids shed in feces by dogs and the high survival and dispersal capacity of eggs outdoors point out the importance of the environmental contamination for public health [4,5,6].
CE is highly endemic in Sub-Saharan Africa, but its true burden is still unknown. In Nigeria, most studies have focused on establishing the prevalence of Echinococcus infection in the definitive host [8,9,10,11,12] and CE among the intermediate hosts [13,14,15], including humans [12,16]. Although the human health challenge represented by CE is widely recognised, to our knowledge, the E. granulosus infection risk associated with environmental contamination in Nigeria has never been investigated. This study, therefore, aimed to estimate the presence of taeniid and E. granulosus s.l. eggs in soil, dog feces and water samples collected from the urban and semi-urban areas in the city of Ibadan in Nigeria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We have carried out a cross sectional study between March and September 2018. The study area was Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria (Figure 1).
Ibadan is located in South West Nigeria, 128 km inland northeast of Lagos and 120 km east of the Nigerian international border with the Republic of Benin. It sits completely within the tropical forest zone, close to the boundary between the forest and the derived savannahs. The city ranges in elevation between 150 m, in the valley area, and 275 m above sea level on the major north-south ridge, which crosses the central part of the city. The city covers a total area of 3080 km2, being the largest in Nigeria [17].
There are eleven Local Governments Areas in the Ibadan Metropolitan area, consisting of five urban local governments (Ibadan North, Ibadan North-East, Ibadan North-West, Ibadan South-East, and Ibadan South-West) and six semi-urban local governments (Akinyele, Egbeda, Ido, Lagelu, OnaAra, Oluyole) [18]. The human population of Ibadan is estimated to be 3,649,000 [19]. The study locations covered three of the 11 Local Government Areas in the Ibadan metropolitan areas: Ibadan North, Ibadan South-West and Akinyele Local Government Areas.

2.2. Sample Size and Sampling

A total of 200 soil, 200 fecal and 50 water samples were collected. We calculated the sample size (n) using the formula [20]
n = (Z2 p (1 − p))/d2,
where Z is the reliability coefficient of 1.96 at 95% confidence level; p is the prevalence of taeniid eggs in dogs at 4.86% [21]; d is the precision at 5%.
The environmental samples were obtained at increasing distances from an abattoir in the city centre; 10, 15, 20, 25, 35 and 50 dog feces and soil samples were, respectively, collected at 5, 10, 20, 40, 100, 200, 500 m and 10 km of distance (Figure 2).
Approximately 5 g of dog feces were obtained from the environment by using polythene covers and stored at −80 °C. Only freshly voided feces, still soft and moist, were collected. It was not possible to attribute a correspondence between the fecal samples found and known animals. As the occurrence of the feces belonging to the same dog cannot be excluded, the number of samples might represent a lower number of dogs. Soil samples were collected from a depth of 3–5 cm in areas usually frequented by dogs [22].
The water samples (10 mL) were collected into sample bottles, obtained from available open water sources and drainages and stored at 4 °C until use.

2.3. Microscopic Analyses

The soil samples were prepared using the O’Lorcain method of flotation, as already described [22]. Briefly, 25–30 mL of 1% Tween 80 was added to a sieved soil sample (20 g) in a conical flask. This was vortexed and sieved into glass tubes. The filtrate was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. The sediment was washed twice with distilled water and resuspended in a saturated NaNO3 solution (1.35 s.p.). Coverslips were placed on top of the tubes, which were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min.
A sedimentation technique was used for the fecal samples, as previously described [11]. The water samples were prepared as follows: approximately 5 mL of silt sediment was collected from each sample and thoroughly mixed with 35 mL of Sheather’s solution (1.30 s.p.). The mixture was divided into two 20 mL glass tubes. Both were filled with additional Sheather’s solution and coverslips were placed on top. The mixture was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min.
The microscopic examination of the soil, feces and water samples was performed to detect taeniid eggs by two different operators. Firstly, the slides were observed, at the optic microscope at 4×, in an ordered pattern. Parasitic eggs were morphologically identified at 10× and 40× magnification. The procedure was repeated until approximately 25% of the sediment in any given sample was used. Samples were considered positive if at least one taeniid egg was detected by both operators.

2.4. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Analyses

The detected taeniid eggs were further identified using a multiplex PCR [23] at the WOAH Reference Laboratory for Echinococcosis in Italy. The nad1 gene for Echinococcus multilocularis, rrnS gene for E. granulosus s.l. and rrnS gene for Taenia spp. were targeted for amplification. The total reaction mix volume was 25 µL: Master Mix (Quanti-Tect Probe PCR Master Mix—QIAGEN®) (12.5 µL); Primer Cest 1: 2 pmol/µL (0.5 µL); Primer Cest 2: 2 pmol/µL (0.5 µL); Primer Cest 3: 2 pmol/µL (0.5 µL); Primer Cest 4: 2 pmol/µL (0.5 µL); Primer Cest 5: 16 pmol/µL (0.5 µL); water (5 µL); and 5 µL of each DNA samples were added (5 ng DNA per tube). Reference samples of Echinococcus granulosus DNA from the WOAH Reference laboratory 10 ng (5 µL) were used as the positive control, while 5 µL of sterile water was used as the negative control.
Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed on precast gels (E-Gel™ EX Agarose Gels, 2% Agarose, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using the E-Gel™ Power Snap Electrophoresis System (Thermo Fisher). The DNA ladder (Marker VIII, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was loaded onto the agarose gel in order to determine the size of the PCR products.

2.5. Data Analysis

All of the data were entered into Microsoft Excel® 2010 and analysed using Epi Info® version 7.2.4.0. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, proportions and percentages, were determined. We also determined the odds ratios and the 95% confidence intervals in order to assess the association between the outcome variable and the independent variables, such as the distances from the abattoir, level of urbanisation, and Local Government Areas. The outcome variable in the bivariate analyses was the proportion of E. granulosus s.l. positive samples. A Fisher’s exact test, at 5% level of significance, was performed.

3. Results

The microscopic examination of the environmental samples revealed the presence of taeniid eggs in 23 out of 200 soil samples (11.5%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 7.7–16.7%); 51 out of 200 dog faecal samples (25.5%, 95% CI: 19.8–32.0%); and four out of the 50 water samples (8.0%, 95% CI: 2.6–19.4%).
Multiplex PCR analyses, performed on the DNA extracted from the environmental samples, evidenced the presence of E. granulosus s.l. in 8.0% (95% CI: 4.9–12.7%) and 24.0% (95% CI: 18.6–30.4%) of soil and fecal samples, respectively (Table 1 and Table 2).
Of the 50 water samples examined, the presence of E. granulosus s.l. was evidenced in one sample (2.0%, 95% CI: 0.0–11.5%). Moreover, 14 soil (7%, 95% CI: 4.1–11.5%) and 32 fecal samples (16.0%, 95% CI: 11.5–21.8%), out of the 200 samples tested, as well as one out of the 50 water samples (2.0%, 95% CI: 0.0–11.5%), were found positive for Taenia spp.
E. granulosus s.l. and Taenia spp. were simultaneously detected in 10 samples (5.0%, 95% CI: 2.6–9.1%) and 32 samples (16.0%, 95% CI: 11.5–21.8%) out of the 200 soil and faecal samples, respectively. All of the samples were found to be negative for E. multilocularis.
The presence of E. granulosus s.l. in the soil samples was found to a variable extent, depending on the increasing distance (5 m, 10 m,20 m, 40 m, 100 m, 200 m, 500 m, 10 km) from the abattoir located in the city centre. No positive sample was detected at the 5 m distance. The percent positivity found at 100 m (24.0%) was significantly higher than that found at 200 m (2.9%) and 10 km (4.0%) (Table 1). Other environmental categorisations, such as the different level of urbanisation and the Local Government Areas, were not significantly associated with the presence of E. granulosus s. l. (Table 1).
As shown in Table 2, the presence of Echinococcus granulosus s.l. in the fecal samples was evidenced at 5 m, 10 m, 20 m, 40 m, 100 m, 200 m, 500 m and 10 km from the abattoir. The percent positivity found at 500 m (5.7%) was significantly lower than that found at 10 m (50.0%) and 10 km (26%) (Table 2). In addition, the different levels of urbanisation and the Local Government Areas were not significantly associated with the presence of E. granulosus s.l. in the fecal samples (Table 2).

4. Discussion

In this work, we aimed to evaluate the environmental contamination by taeniid eggs, and in particular E. granulosus s.l., in the city of Ibadan in South West Nigeria. To this end, soil, dog feces and water samples were collected and analysed by both traditional parasitological and molecular methods. Our results contribute to the evaluation of the environmental contamination caused by taeniid eggs in Nigeria. This information is of crucial importance because of the zoonotic risk determined by taeniids, and especially by E. granulosus s.l. eggs, dispersed by infected dogs. Furthermore, the persistence of viable eggs to external climatic conditions [6,24] raises concerns for human exposure, either directly or indirectly, through contaminated food and water [5].
Microscopic examination evidenced substantial levels of taeniid egg contamination in soil and water, concurrently, with higher values found in dogs feces. A multiplex PCR [23] was also performed for the simultaneous detection of Taenia spp. and Echinococcus in the environmental samples. The higher sensitivity of PCR for taeniid egg detection allowed us to confirm the results obtained by microscopic examination, the latter being easily affected by biases inherent to the visual assessment of images. As expected, the multiplex PCR results for E. multilocularis were negative in all of the environmental samples tested. More interestingly, we evidenced the presence of E. granulosus s.l. in soil, fecal and water samples. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the environmental contamination by E. granulosus s.l. in Nigeria using molecular tools.
In Nigeria, the exact picture of E. granulousus infection is unclear, as investigations have remained scarce in the last few years. A recent meta-analysis of data published over 50 years estimated that Northern Africa displayed the highest prevalence of E. granulosus in the African continent, followed by Eastern Africa [12].
Ohiolei et al. [25] reviewed the CE reports in Nigeria, pointing out that the real prevalence in animals and humans was still unknown in many areas of the country and that proper information on environmental contamination is lacking. In Oyo State, high prevalences of Echinococcus taeniasis and CE were respectively recorded in definitive [10] and intermediate hosts [13]. Our previous work evidenced a 5.5% prevalence of E. granulosus s.l. [11] in owned dogs in Lagos State in Nigeria, which may imply even higher values in different population groups not receiving the same health care as companion animals. As a matter of fact, in this study, we recorded an almost 5-fold higher presence of E. granulosus s.l. (24%) in stray dogs compared to owned dogs. The percentage of E. granulosus s.l. infection in the dog fecal samples collected from urban and periurban areas were similar to those observed in Tunisia (25%), while those in China were slightly higher (33%) [26,27]. On the contrary, a lower presence of E. granulosus was found in Europe (2.2%), Buthan (3.7%) and Chile (2.1%) [28,29,30].
Our findings evidenced the presence of E. granulosus both in soil (8%) and water (2%) samples, highlighting the risks for human health related to environment contamination. In particular, fresh vegetables produced in contaminated environments represent a potential source of human infection if consumed raw or without proper washing. Several reports evidenced the presence of taeniid eggs in various types of vegetables collected from local markets in Nigeria, with positive percentages ranging between 2% and 18%. The detection of parasite eggs in vegetables had been correlated with direct contact of the plant with the contaminated soil, as well as with the use of contaminated water for irrigation or post-harvesting washing [31,32,33]. Water had already been associated as a possible route of human infection with E. granulosus [34,35], E. multilocularis [28] and other tapeworms belonging to the Taeniidae family [36]. Furthermore, stray dogs also play a crucial role on CE transmission in urban areas of endemic regions; in particular, children are reported to be at high risk of infection due to soil contamination in parks and playgrounds [37,38]. There are few studies specifically examining the presence of E. granulosus in soil and water; however, our findings evidenced higher levels of environmental contamination than those obtained in rural homesteads in Kazakhstan and in educational farms in Italy [39,40].
The present work also aimed to evaluate the role of different environmental factors (proximity to a slaughterhouse, level of urbanisation, Local Government Area of belonging) in the dissemination of E. granulosus s.l. eggs. To this end, soil and fecal samples were collected at increasing distances from a slaughterhouse, in urban and semi-urban contexts and in different Local Government Areas. Our results suggested that soil contamination by E. granulosus s.l. appeared to decrease as the distance from the slaughterhouse increased, considering the significant higher presence of the parasite found at 100 m respect to 200 m and 10 km. These results are in contrast with those observed for dog fecal samples, the contamination rate of which was not related to the distance from the slaughterhouse. This is also in agreement with the findings of Chaâbane-Banaoues et al., in Tunisia [26], which reported no association between the dissemination of E. granulosus s.l. eggs and the presence of abattoirs in the proximity. The presence of roaming dogs in the slaughterhouse or in the immediate surroundings may imply easy access to infected offal by dogs, resulting in E. granulosus cycle perpetration and of the increase in environmental contamination risk [12].
As demonstrated by Sánchez et al. [24], the dispersion of E. granulosus eggs and environment contamination seem to be related to the infection burden, the behaviour of dogs (dog movements and habits), the meteorological conditions (wind direction) and the landscape characteristics (presence of vegetation and water). All of these factors, particularly those regarding the definitive hosts, need to be considered to explain the varying detection levels observed in the soil and fecal samples in the study areas.

5. Conclusions

The current study has clearly demonstrated that both urban and semi-urban areas of the city of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, are highly contaminated by taeniid, and particularly E. granulosus s.l., eggs. The extent of the environmental contamination found in this study raises public health issues and suggests the adoption of appropriate measures to prevent and control CE. It is recommended that veterinary authorities enforce control over the movement of stray dogs and establish a deworming programme. Finally, parents and caregivers should discourage children from playing with soil in public spaces. Additional studies to molecularly characterise the taeniid species, including E. granulosus s.l., are required to appropriately understand the zoonotic potential of parasitic contamination.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.J.A.; methodology, A.O., A.P., G.M. (Gabriella Masu) and P.B.; validation, P.B.; formal analysis, E.J.A. and A.O.; investigation, A.O., A.P. and P.B.; resources, G.M. (Giovanna Masala) and G.M. (Gabriella Masu); writing—original draft preparation, E.J.A. and P.B.; writing—review and editing, P.B. and G.M. (Giovanna Masala); visualization, P.B. and E.J.A.; project administration, E.J.A., G.M. (Giovanna Masala) and P.B.; funding acquisition, G.M. (Giovanna Masala). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the co-operation and kind support of Beatrice Kolawole of the Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria for their various roles during sample and data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Echinococcosis. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/echinococcosis (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  2. Romig, T.; Ebi, D.; Wassermann, M. Taxonomy and molecular epidemiology of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 213, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Alvarez Rojas, C.A.; Romig, T.; Lightowlers, M.W. Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato genotypes infecting humans—Review of current knowledge. Int. J. Parasitol. 2014, 44, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO/OIE. Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals A Public Health Problem of Global Concern. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/929044522X (accessed on 24 August 2022).
  5. Tamarozzi, F.; Deplazes, P.; Casulli, A. Reinventing the wheel of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato transmission to humans. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alvarez Rojas, C.A.; Mathis, A.; Deplazes, P. Assessing the contamination of food and the environment with Taenia and Echinococcus eggs and their zoonotic transmission. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2018, 5, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Thevenet, P.S.; Jensen, O.; Drut, R.; Cerrone, G.E.; Grenóvero, M.S.; Alvarez, H.M.; Targovnik, H.M.; Basualdo, J.A. Viability and infectiousness of eggs of Echinococcus granulosus aged under natural conditions of inferior arid climate. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 133, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dada, B.J.O.; Adegboye, D.S.; Mohammed, A.N. The epidemiology of Echinococcus infection in Kano State, Nigeria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1980, 74, 515–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Okolo, M.I. Prevalence and public health implications of Echinococcus granulosus in rural dogs in Eastern Nigeria. Int. J. Zoonoses 1986, 13, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  10. Adediran, O.A.; Kolapo, T.U.; Uwalaka, E.C. Echinococcus granulosus prevalence in dogs in southwest Nigeria. J. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 2014, 124358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Awosanya, E.J.; Ligali, Z.; Duedu, K.O.; Peruzzu, A.; Masala, G.; Bonelli, P. Prevalence of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Owned Dogs in Lagos State, Nigeria. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karshima, S.N.; Ahmed, M.I.; Adamu, N.B.; Magaji, A.A.; Zakariah, M.; Mohammed, K. Africa-wide meta-analysis on the prevalence and distribution of human cystic echinococcosis and canine Echinococcus granulosus infections. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ayanwale, F.O.; Dipeolu, O.O.; Esuruoso, G.O. The incidence of Echinococcus infection in dogs, sheep and goats slaughtered in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int. J. Zoonoses 1982, 9, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Onah, D.N.; Chiejina, S.N.; Emehelu, C.O. Epidemiology of echinococcosis/hydatidosis in Anambra State, Nigeria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1989, 83, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Magaji, A.A.; Oboegbulem, S.I.; Daneji, A.I.; Garba, H.S.; Salihu, M.D.; Junaidu, A.U.; Mohammed, A.A.; Lawal, M.; Aminu, S.; Yakubu, Y.; et al. Incidence of Hydatid cyst disease in food animals slaughtered at sokoto central abattoir, Sokoto state, Nigeria. Vet. World 2011, 4, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bitrus, D.; Weka, R.; Yakubu, R.; Ogo, I.N.; Kamani, J.; Ikeh, E. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of human cystic echinococcosis in some parts of Plateau State, Nigeria. Niger. J. Parasitol. 2020, 41, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Areola, O. The Spatial Growth of Ibadan City and Its Impact on the Rural Hinterland. In Ibadan Region; Filani, M.O., Akintola, F.O., Ikporukpo, C.O., Eds.; Rex Charles Publication: Ibadan, Nigeria, 1994; pp. 72–84. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tomori, M.A. Origin of Ibadan Land. Available online: https://macosconsultancy.com/Ibadan metropolitan.html (accessed on 3 August 2022).
  19. MacroTrends. Ibadan, Nigeria Metro Area Population 1950–2022. Available online: https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/21990/ibadan/population (accessed on 3 August 2022).
  20. Thrusfield, M. Veterinary Epidemiology, 3rd ed.; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Awosanya, E.; Ndiaye, S. Prevalence and factors associated with taeniid infection among owned dogs in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Niger. Vet. J. 2022, 41, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gnani Charitha, V.; Rayulu, V.C.; Kondaiah, P.M.; Srilatha, C. Comparative evaluation of flotation techniques for the detection of soil borne parasites. J. Parasit. Dis. 2013, 37, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Trachsel, D.; Deplazes, P.; Mathis, A. Identification of taeniid eggs in the faeces from carnivores based on multiplex PCR using targets in mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology 2007, 134, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sánchez Thevenet, P.; Alvarez, H.M.; Torrecillas, C.; Jensen, O.; Basualdo, J.A. Dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina. J. Helminthol. 2019, 94, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ohiolei, J.A.; Yan, H.B.; Li, L.; Zhu, G.Q.; Muku, R.J.; Wu, Y.T.; Jia, W.Z. Review of Cystic Echinococcosis in Nigeria: A Story of Neglect. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chaâbane-Banaoues, R.; Oudni-M’rad, M.; M’Rad, S.; Mezhoud, H.; Babba, H. Environmental contamination by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato eggs in relation to slaughterhouses in urban and rural areas in Tunisia. Korean J. Parasitol. 2016, 54, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, C.N.; Xu, Y.Y.; Cadavid-Restrepo, A.M.; Lou, Z.Z.; Yan, H.B.; Li, L.; Fu, B.Q.; Gray, D.J.; Clements, A.A.; Barnes, T.S.; et al. Estimating the prevalence of Echinococcus in domestic dogs in highly endemic for echinococcosis. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2018, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Laurimaa, L.; Davison, J.; Süld, K.; Plumer, L.; Oja, R.; Moks, E.; Keis, M.; Hindrikson, M.; Kinkar, L.; Laurimäe, T.; et al. First report of highly pathogenic Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 in dogs in a European urban environment. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sharma, P.M.; Thapa, N.K.; Tshomo, P.; Dema, T.; Alvarez Rojas, C.A.; Tenzin, T.; Gurung, R.B.; Norbu, T.; Lhatru, L.; Namgyel, P.; et al. Occurrence of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato and other Taeniids in Bhutan. Pathogens 2021, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Francisco Alvarez, J.; Ruiz, R.; Ríos, J.; Rojas, C.A.A.; Alvarez, J.F.; Ruiz, R.; Ríos, J.; Rojas, A.; Molecular, C.A. Molecular detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in environmental dog faecal samples from the Magallanes region, Patagonia, Chile. Pathogens 2021, 1, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maikai, B.V.; Elisha, I.A.; Baba-Onoja, E.B.T. Contamination of vegetables sold in markets with helminth eggs in Zaria metropolis, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Food Control 2012, 28, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adamu, N.B.; Adamu, J.Y.; Mohammed, D. Prevalence of helminth parasites found on vegetables sold in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria. Food Control 2012, 25, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adenusi, A.A.; Abimbola, W.A.; Adewoga, T.O.S. Human intestinal helminth contamination in pre-washed, fresh vegetables for sale in major markets in Ogun State, southwest Nigeria. Food Control 2015, 50, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Torgerson, P.R.; Karaeva, R.R.; Corkeri, N.; Abdyjaparov, T.A.; Kuttubaev, O.T.; Shaikenov, B.S. Human cystic echinococcosis in Kyrgystan: An epidemiological study. Acta Trop. 2003, 85, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dowling, P.M.; Abo-Shehada, M.N.; Torgerson, P.R. Risk factors associated with human cystic echinococcosis in Jordan: Results of a case-control study. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2016, 94, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lass, A.; Szostakowska, B.; Kontogeorgos, I.; Korzeniewski, K.; Karamon, J.; Sulima, M.; Karanis, P. First detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in environmental water sources in endemic areas using capsule filtration and molecular detection methods. Water Res. 2019, 160, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Craig, P.S.; Macpherson, C.N.; Watson-Jones, D.L.; Nelson, G.S. Immunodetection of Echinococcus eggs from naturally infected dogs and from environmental contamination sites in settlements in Turkana, Kenya. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 82, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Amahmid, O.; El Guamri, Y.; Zenjari, K.; Bouhout, S.; Ait Moh, M.; Boraam, F.; Ait Melloul, A.; Benfaida, H.; Bouhoum, K.; Belghyti, D. The pattern of cystic echinococcosis in children in an endemic area in Morocco. J. Parasit. Dis. Off. Organ Indian Soc. Parasitol. 2019, 43, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shaikenov, B.S.; Rysmukhambetova, A.T.; Massenov, B.; Deplazes, P.; Mathis, A.; Torgerson, P.R. Short report: The use of a polymerase chain reaction to detect Echinococcus granulosus (G1 strain) eggs in soil samples. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 71, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Serra, E.; Masu, G.; Chisu, V.; Cappai, S.; Masala, G.; Loi, F.; Piseddu, T. Environmental contamination by Echinococcus spp. eggs as a risk for human health in educational farms of Sardinia, Italy. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vetsci 09 00679 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of Nigeria highlighting Oyo State in green.
Figure 1. Map of Nigeria highlighting Oyo State in green.
Vetsci 09 00679 g001
Vetsci 09 00679 g002 550
Figure 2. Samples collection points across the three Local Government Areas covered in Ibadan Metropolitan area, Oyo State. Dots represent Echinococcus granulosus positive (red) and negative (green) results. The arrow indicates the position of the abattoir.
Figure 2. Samples collection points across the three Local Government Areas covered in Ibadan Metropolitan area, Oyo State. Dots represent Echinococcus granulosus positive (red) and negative (green) results. The arrow indicates the position of the abattoir.
Vetsci 09 00679 g002
Table
Table 1. Environmental factors associated with E. granulosus s.l. presence in soil samples (n = 200) from open fields in Ibadan.
Table 1. Environmental factors associated with E. granulosus s.l. presence in soil samples (n = 200) from open fields in Ibadan.
VariablesCharacteristicsE. granulosus Positive Soil
n = 16		E. granulosus Negative Soil
n = 184		Odds Ratio
(95% CI)		p Value
Distance from abattoir 5 m0 (0.0)10 (100.0)0.00 (0.00, 27.50)1.00
10 m2 (20.0)8 (80.0)5.73 (0.37, 89.87)0.13
20 m2 (13.3)13 (86.7)3.60 (0.24, 54.13)0.23
40 m1 (5.0)19 (95.0)1.26 (0.02, 25.53)1.00
100 m6 (24.0)19 (76.0)7.35 (1.18, 80.69)0.01 *
200 m1 (2.9)34 (97.1)0.71 (0.01, 14.13)1.00
500 m2 (5.7)33 (94.3)1.45 (0.10, 20.91)1.00
10 km2 (4.0)48 (96.0)Ref.
Level of urbanisationSemi-Urban2 (8.0)23 (92.0)1.00 (0.10, 4.81)1.00
Urban14 (8.0)161 (92.0)
Local Government AreaIbadan North14 (9.3)136 (90.7)Ref.
Ibadan South West0 (0.0)25 (100.0)0.00 (0.00, 1.77)0.23
Akinyele2 (8.0)23 (92.0)0.85 (0.09, 4.08)1.00
Values in brackets indicate the percentage of positive and negative samples in each subgroup. * Significant p value (p ≤ 0.05); CI = Confidence interval.
Table
Table 2. Environmental factors associated with E. granulosus s.l. presence in fecal samples (n = 200) from stray dogs in Ibadan.
Table 2. Environmental factors associated with E. granulosus s.l. presence in fecal samples (n = 200) from stray dogs in Ibadan.
VariablesCharacteristicsE. granulosus Positive Feces
n = 48		E. granulosus Negative Feces
n = 152		Odds Ratio
(95% CI)		p Value
Distance from abattoir 5 m3 (30.0)7 (70.0)1.22 (0.18, 6.39)1.00
10 m5 (50.0)5 (50.0)2.78 (0.55, 14.39)0.15
20 m3 (20.0)12 (80.0)0.72 (0.11, 3.28)0.74
40 m7 (35.0)13 (65.0)1.52 (0.42, 5.28)0.56
100 m8 (32.0)17 (68.0)1.33 (0.40, 4.28)0.60
200 m7 (20.0)28 (80.0)0.71 (0.21, 2.24)0.61
500 m2 (5.7)33 (94.3)0.18 (0.02, 0.86)0.02 *
10 km13 (26.0)37 (74.0)Ref
Level of urbanisationSemi-Urban6 (24.0)19 (76.0)1.00 (0.31, 2.83)1.00
Urban42 (24.0)133 (76.0)
Local Government AreaIbadan North35 (23.3)115 (76.7)Ref.
Ibadan South West7 (28.0)18 (72.0)1.28 (0.42, 3.54)0.62
Akinyele6 (24.0)19 (76.0)1.04 (0.31, 2.98)1.00
Values in brackets indicate the percentage of positive and negative samples in each subgroup. * Significant p value (p ≤ 0.05); CI = Confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Awosanya, E.J.; Olagbaju, A.; Peruzzu, A.; Masu, G.; Masala, G.; Bonelli, P. Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Environmental Samples from Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120679

AMA Style

Awosanya EJ, Olagbaju A, Peruzzu A, Masu G, Masala G, Bonelli P. Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Environmental Samples from Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9(12):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Awosanya, Emmanuel Jolaoluwa, Adeola Olagbaju, Angela Peruzzu, Gabriella Masu, Giovanna Masala, and Piero Bonelli. 2022. "Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Environmental Samples from Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria" Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 12: 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120679

APA Style

Awosanya, E. J., Olagbaju, A., Peruzzu, A., Masu, G., Masala, G., & Bonelli, P. (2022). Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in Environmental Samples from Ibadan, Oyo State, South West Nigeria. Veterinary Sciences, 9(12), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop