Next Article in Journal
Proteomics Evaluation of Semen of Clinically Healthy Beagle-Breed Dogs
Next Article in Special Issue
Local and Systemic Antibody Responses in Beef Calves Vaccinated with a Modified-Live Virus Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus (BRSV) Vaccine at Birth following BRSV Infection
Previous Article in Journal
The Mechanism of Important Components in Canine Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Water Sources and Shared Fence Lines on Bovine Respiratory Disease Incidence in the First 45 Days on Feed
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sexual Dimorphic Innate Immune Response to a Viral–Bacterial Respiratory Disease Challenge in Beef Calves

Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(12), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120696
by Nicole C. Burdick Sanchez *, Paul R. Broadway and Jeffery A. Carroll
Reviewer 2:
Vet. Sci. 2022, 9(12), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120696
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 10 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Bovine Respiratory Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The proposal of the manuscript is very useful in order to response about activation of immune innate system during BRD infections. Therefore I have some suggestions and comments that had appointed in the manuscript.

I suggest for futher studies to include the female hormone factors to interfere in the immune response. 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the author responses to the Reviewer's comments in the attached file. We greatly appreciate the Reviewer's thorough review of our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear all,

In general I could not find any potential problem with the submission "Sexual dimorphic innate immune response to a viral-bacterial respiratory disease challenge in beef calves". Overall all results are in agreement with material and methos and interesting correlation sexuality and immune properties. Tables and Figures are satisfatory and the discussion brings a controversial between the results and the literature. In addition, abstract and introduction are well presented. Finally, the manuscript sounds very good.

Author Response

We thank the Reviewer for their thorough review of the manuscript.

Back to TopTop