Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery
by
, ,
Urvish Jain
1, 
Bhav Jain
2,
James Brown
3,
Ibrahim B. Sultan
3,*,
Floyd Thoma
3,
Katherine M. Anetakis
4,
Jeffrey R. Balzer
4,
Kathirvel Subramaniam
5,
Sarah Yousef
3,
Yisi Wang
3,
Raul Nogueira
6 and
Parthasarathy D. Thirumala
4,6 1
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2
School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
3
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
4
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
5
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
6
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010027
Submission received: 26 December 2023
/
Revised: 14 January 2024
/
Accepted: 15 January 2024
/
Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Factors and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery)
Abstract
:Perioperative transient ischemic attacks (PTIAs) are associated with significantly increased rates of postoperative complications such as low cardiac output, atrial fibrillation, and significantly higher mortality in cardiac procedures. The current literature on PTIAs is sparse and understudied. Therefore, we aim to understand the effects of PTIA on hospital utilization, readmission, and morbidity. Using data on all the cardiac procedures at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2011 to 2019, fine and gray analysis was performed to identify whether PTIAs and covariables correlate with increased hospital utilization, stroke, all-cause readmission, Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE), MI, and all-cause mortality. Logistic regression for longer hospitalization showed that PTIA (HR: 2.199 [95% CI: 1.416–3.416] increased utilization rates. Fine and gray modeling indicated that PTIA (HR: 1.444 [95% CI: 1.096–1.902], p < 0.01) increased the rates of follow-up all-cause readmission. However, PTIA (HR: 1.643 [95% CI: 0.913–2.956] was not statistically significant for stroke readmission modeling. Multivariate modeling for MACCE events within 30 days of surgery (HR: 0.524 [95% CI: 0.171–1.605], p > 0.25) and anytime during the follow-up period (HR: 1.116 [95% CI: 0.825–1.509], p > 0.45) showed no significant correlation with PTIA. As a result of PTIA’s significant burden on the healthcare system due to increased utilization, it is critical to better define and recognize PTIA for timely management to improve perioperative outcomes.
1. Introduction
Currently, the consequences of perioperative transient ischemic attacks (PTIAs) are understudied, and relatively little literature exists on both short- and long-term patient recovery. PTIAs are associated with significantly increased rates of low cardiac output, atrial fibrillation, and significantly higher mortality in cardiac procedures [1]. While relatively uncommon in low-risk surgical procedures, the current literature on PTIAs is sparse. In 2020, the Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) removed PTIA from their operative discharge survey, further reducing the data on and research into PTIAs.
In non-operative settings, TIA has been shown to increase the risk of recurrent TIA, stroke, cardiovascular events, and mortality [2]. In some cases, TIA has an imaging correlation with and is labeled as stroke for appropriate evaluation and management. This has led to changes in the definition of TIA in non-operative settings, and clinical trials like ABCD and ABCD2 to evaluate effective management [3]. PTIA and PTIA-like symptoms can be due to TIA, infections, or stroke/seizure/any metabolic derangement causing altered mental status or cardiac complications, which makes PTIA often underreported or missed. Additionally, the neurological changes may be subtle or brief, further complicating estimation of its incidence. It is not always evaluated after vascular surgery even though it has a high incidence, in which case it is silent in imaging tools [4].
Therefore, to understand the effects of PTIA, we used our institution’s STS data set to evaluate whether PTIA (1) increases the length of stay in the hospital and ICU, (2) increases readmission from stroke and all causes, and (3) increases Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE), stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality within 30 days and during the follow-up period. We expect these results will be helpful to the surgical and stroke community in understanding the impact of perioperative TIAs and improving awareness and recognition. We also expect these results to be helpful in designing therapeutic interventions for the effective management of perioperative TIAs.
2. Patients and Methods
2.1. Study Population
Using data from all cardiothoracic surgeries (Aortic Root, CABG and AV, CABG and MV, CABG and PV, CABG and TV, Double Valve, Isolated AV, Isolated CABG, Isolated MV, Isolated PV, Isolated TV, TAVR, Triple Valve, Other) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), we identified 18,926 total index cases to analyze from 2011 through 2019. This study period was chosen as the STS removed TIA from follow-up surveys in 2020. Cases that did not include follow-up data or with patients that died within one day of surgery were excluded, leaving 18,874 total cases. (Figure 1) All ischemic, hemorrhagic, and undetermined strokes were included in the patient population. All urgent, emergent, and elective cases were included. The operative data were retrospectively obtained from a prospectively maintained cardiac surgical database. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh on 17 April 2019 (STUDY18120143), with written consent being waived.
2.2. Definitions
Transient Ischemic Attack: Defined based on the STS guidelines of a patient having a history of loss of neurological function that was abrupt in onset but with a complete return of functionality within 24 h, presumed to be of vascular etiology; this does not include neurological disease processes such as metabolic and/or anoxic ischemic encephalopathy [5]. The TIA data were further adjusted in the clinical data extraction.
Longer Length of Stay: ICU length of stay was considered longer if it was longer than 3 days. Hospital length of stay was considered longer if it was longer than 14 days [6].
Readmission: Defined based on the STS definition of whether a patient was readmitted to any hospital within 30 days of discharge because of any cause related to the previous operation [5].
2.3. Statistical Analysis:
The primary outcome measurements in this study were hospital utilization based on longer length of stay, stroke-related or all-cause readmission, and a compound morbidity outcome of six variables defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. These outcomes included (1) in-hospital death, (2) acute postoperative myocardial infarction, (3) neurologic morbidity, including focal or global neurologic deficits or death without awakening, (4) serious infection morbidity consisting of sepsis syndrome or septic shock, (5) new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis, and (6) postoperative ventilatory support exceeding 72 h. These outcomes were compared to covariables in the model that were selected by physicians. These covariables included age, sex, diabetes, prior heart failure, cardiovascular accidents, and PTIA. The categorical variables were presented by count and percentage; the continuous variables were presented by Mean ± S.D. or Median with IQR. When applicable, Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variable comparison. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test, Student’s t-test, or the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables when appropriate. Survival was compared using Kaplan–Meier analysis (log rank test). The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoenfeld residuals. For the readmission models, competing risk analysis with a fine and gray model was used, and death was the competing risk event. Follow-up started when surgery was performed; for readmission events, follow-up started at discharge from hospital. The all-cause mortality data were verified against the U.S. Social Security Death Index database. If last follow-up dates were missing, the case was censored on the date we pulled out the data.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
Of the 18,874 total index cases between 2011 and 2019, 1194 (6.33%) were Aortic Root, 1508 (7.99%) were CABG and AV, 615 (3.26%) were CABG and MV, 2 (0.01%) were CABG and PV, 26 (0.14%) were CABG and TV, 1055 (5.59%) were Double Valve, 2318 (12.28%) were Isolated AV, 7725 (40.93%) were Isolated CABG, 1305 (6.91%) were Isolated MV, 15 (0.08%) were Isolated PV, 111 (0.59%) were Isolated TV, 1575 (8.34%) were TAVR, 96 (0.51%) were Triple Valve, and 1329 (7.04%) were classified as Other.
Furthermore, 82 of the cases were identified as PTIA, giving a rate of 0.43% in the analysis cohort. A total of 6500 (34.4%) patients were female, and the median age of all patients was 68 (q1–q3, 59–76). Equally, 17,474 (92.5%) were white, 910 (4.8%) were black, and 490 (2.6%) were other races. The main comorbidities in the population included 7131 (37.7%) patients that had diabetes, 5753 (30.48%) patients that had previous heart failure, 15,808 (83.7%) patients that had hypertension, and 7857 (41.6%) that had previous myocardial infarctions. (Table 1).
3.2. PTIA and Hospital Utilization
A total of 6502 (34.5%) patients had extended lengths of stay (patient in ICU for over 3 days or total length of stay over 14 days) with the median stay at 8 (q1–q3, 5–12) days after surgery. Logistic regression for longer hospitalization showed that PTIA (HR: 2.199 [95% CI: 1.416–3.416], p < 0.001), being female (HR: 1.216 [95% CI: 1.141–1.296], p < 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.267 [95% CI: 1.191–1.349], p < 0.001), prior heart failure (HR: 1.421 [95% CI: 1.330–1.518], p < 0.0001), and cerebrovascular accidents (HR: 1.695 [95% CI: 1.534–1.873], p < 0.0001) were all associated with increased utilization rates. Surprisingly, higher age (HR: 0.993 [95% CI: 0.990–0.995], p < 0.0001) was negatively associated with longer hospitalization (Table 2).
3.3. PTIA and Risk of Readmission
A total of 1636 (8.7%) of the analysis cohort had stroke readmission and 10,437 (55.3%) had all cause readmission in the follow-up period. The fine and gray modeling indicated that diabetes (HR: 1.205 [95% CI: 1.091–1.330], p < 0.001) and cerebrovascular accidents (HR: 1.772 [95% CI: 1.545–2.033], p < 0.001) were key indicators for follow-up stroke readmission. PTIA (HR: 1.643 [95% CI: 0.913–2.956], p < 0.10), age (HR: 1.003 [95% CI: 0.999–1.007], p < 0.15), being female (HR: 1.018 [95% CI: 0.919–1.128], p < 0.75), and prior heart failure (HR: 1.065 [95% CI: 0.956–1.186], p < 0.30) were not statistically significant to the stroke readmission modeling.
The fine and gray modeling indicated that PTIA (HR: 1.444 [95% CI: 1.096–1.902], p < 0.01), being female (HR: 1.077 [95% CI: 1.034–1.122], p < 0.0001), diabetes (HR: 1.248 [95% CI: 1.200–1.298], p < 0.0001), prior heart failure (HR: 1.279 [95% CI: 1.226–1.334], p < 0.0001), and previous cerebrovascular accidents (HR: 1.196 [95% CI: 1.121–1.77], p < 0.0001) were all causes of increased rates of follow-up all-cause readmission. The results for age (HR: 1.001 [95% CI: 0.999–1.002], p < 0.45) and all-cause readmission were not statistically significant (Table 3).
3.4. PTIA and Risk of Mortality
The multivariate modeling for MACCE events within 30 days of surgery showed a positive correlation with age (HR: 1.012 [95% CI: 1.007–1.017], p < 0.0001), being female (HR: 1.240 [95% CI: 1.104–1.393], p < 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.231 [95% CI: 1.098–1.381], p < 0.001), prior heart failure (HR: 1.516 [95% CI: 1.344–1.709], p < 0.0001), and cerebrovascular accidents (HR: 1.488 [95% CI: 1.263–1.754], p < 0.0001). The multivariate modeling for all MACCE events anytime during the follow-up period showed similar positive correlations with age (HR: 1.018 [95% CI: 1.016–1.020], p < 0.0001), diabetes (HR: 1.386 [95% CI: 1.326–1.449], p < 0.001), prior heart failure (HR: 1.551 [95% CI: 1.481–1.626], p < 0.0001), and cerebrovascular accidents (HR: 1.552 [95% CI: 1.450–1.660], p < 0.0001).
PTIA did not significantly increase the risk of 30-day MACCE (HR: 0.524 [95% CI: 0.171–1.605], p > 0.25) and all MACCE (HR: 1.116 [95% CI: 0.825–1.509], p > 0.45) (Table 4). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed the difference in 5-year survival in the “No PTIA” cohort and the “TPIA” cohort were not statistically significant as log rank p = 0.2665 (Figure 2).
4. Discussion
Based on our results, patients with PTIA have significantly increased key measures of healthcare utilization. This supports research showing that non-operative TIAs cause patients to stay on average 2.6 days longer and cost 40% more than non-affected patients, which is also a concern for PTIAs [9]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and better define PTIAs, as there is no current standardized clinical definition [10]. Other factors that increased the length of stay following cardiac surgery included being female, diabetes, prior heart failure, and prior cerebrovascular accidents. Interestingly, age was negatively correlated with length of stay. Previous literature has shown that age does not have a monotonous relationship with the length of stay after non-operative TIAs and decreases in certain age groups (50–59 years old); alternatively, it may be attributed to increased rates of death in hospital [11].
PTIA also increased the rates of all-cause readmission, but not stroke readmission. Diabetes and previous cerebrovascular events were correlated with higher rates of stroke and all-cause readmission. In addition, being female and prior heart failure were also risk factors for all-cause readmission. Readmission studies in hospital registries for non-operative TIAs have shown that the most often cause is infection and other non-neurological conditions, which is consistent with our findings [12]. This information can be helpful for hospitals to evaluate readmission reduction strategies in patients with PTIA.
Based on our results, patients who experienced PTIA did not have an increased risk of MACCE and 30-day MACCE. This is interesting given that TIAs that occur in non-operative settings have been shown to significantly increase MACCE and 30-day MACCE events [13]. Our results could be secondary to the low number of PTIAs in the entire cohort and the mortality risk from surgery from other causes. Thus, the impact of PTIA might not be clear as compared to non-operative TIA. The multivariate modeling showed that age, being female, diabetes, prior heart failure, and prior cerebrovascular events were all factors for MACCE events within 30 days of surgery. The modeling for MACCE events at any time during the follow-up showed similar results, with age, diabetes, prior heart failure, and previous cerebrovascular events being positively correlated. This supports the previous literature also showing that long-term MACCE events are correlated with age, previous ischemic strokes, congestive heart failure, GFR < 60 mL/min, mRS ≥ 3 at discharge, and atrial fibrillation [13]. The significantly higher percentage of our study population having long-term MACCE events compared to 30-day MACCE events (41.9% vs. 6.2%, respectively) is similar to previous studies and highlights the need for lifetime follow-up, lifestyle changes, and primary care following cardiac surgery [14].
Our study is unique in that it quantifies PTIA’s impact on outcomes such as MACCE, 30-day MACCE, readmission, and extended length of stay after cardiac surgeries in an extensive academic medical system from a large database. To our knowledge, it is the first study to quantify and report these numbers. The limitations of this study stem from the retrospective nature of the data, the limited sample size of PTIAs in the index population, and the limited patient demographics. Inherent to all large retrospective database studies, it is still unclear what causes PTIA, as our results only measure correlation and not causative factors. We are also limited by a lack of adherence to the proper chart documentation, notably lacking data on PTIA in certain cases. Our model would benefit from more data as our sample size only contains 82 PTIA cases. Our study is also limited by a lack of diversity as our population is predominantly white (92.6%) and male (65.6%) because of only having data from a single regional medical system. Future directions include replicating this study with data from other regions or health systems, utilizing machine learning models or artificial intelligence to create more accurate predictive models, or understanding what factors are causative for PTIA.
5. Conclusions
Our results suggest that while PTIA increases risk of ICU stay, hospital length of stay, and all-cause readmission, it does not increase risk of mortality or MACCE events. As a result of PTIA’s significant burden on the healthcare system due to increased utilization, it is critical to better define and recognize PTIA for timely management to improve perioperative outcomes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.D.T. and J.R.B.; methodology, Y.W.; software, Y.W.; validation, U.J., Y.W. and P.D.T.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, U.J.; resources, I.B.S. and F.T.; data curation, K.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, U.J. and B.J.; writing—review and editing, K.M.A., J.B. and B.J.; visualization, Y.W.; supervision, S.Y., K.S. and R.N.; project administration, P.D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY18120143 17 April 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board due to the deidentified nature of the dataset.
Data Availability Statement
Data is unavailable due to privacy and ethical restrictions. The authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
I.B.S. reports research and grant support from Abbott, Artivion, AtriCure, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Terumo Aortic. R.G.N. reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, CERENOVUS, Genentech, Philips, Hybernia, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Philips, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Stryker Neurovascular, Shanghai Wallaby, and Synchron, and stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Viz.ai, RapidPulse, and Perfuze. R.G.N. is one of the principal investigators of the “Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes (ENDOLOW)” trial. R.G.N. is the principal investigator of the “Combined Thrombectomy for Distal MediUm Vessel Occlusion StroKe (DUSK)” trial. R.G.N. is an investor in Viz.ai, Perfuze, Cerebrotech, Reist/Q’Apel Medical, Truvic, Vastrax, and Viseon.
References
- Engelman, D.T.; Cohn, L.H.; Rizzo, R.J. Incidence and predictors of tias and strokes following coronary artery bypass grafting: Report and collective review. Heart Surg. Forum 1999, 2, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Johnston, S.C. Short-term Prognosis After Emergency Department Diagnosis of TIA. JAMA 2000, 284, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, A.; Jani, V. The ABCD and ABCD2 Scores and the Risk of Stroke following a TIA: A Narrative Review. ISRN Neurol. 2011, 2011, 518621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, P.; Scharf, J.; Peña-Tapia, P.; Vajkoczy, P. Risk of intraoperative ischemia due to temporary vessel occlusion during standard extracranial–intracranial arterial bypass surgery. JNS 2008, 108, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, F.G.; Falcoz, P.E.; Kozower, B.D.; Salati, M.; Wright, C.D.; Brunelli, A. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Databases: Joint Standardization of Variable Definitions and Terminology. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015, 99, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almashrafi, A.; Alsabti, H.; Mukaddirov, M.; Balan, B.; Aylin, P. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following cardiac surgery in a major referral hospital in Oman: A retrospective observational study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.Y.; Gaudino, M.; Chen, R.J.; Bader Eddeen, A.; Ruel, M. Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, B.G.; Rha, S.; Yoon, S.G.; Choi, C.U.; Lee, M.W.; Kim, S.W. Association of Major Adverse Cardiac Events up to 5 Years in Patients With Chest Pain Without Significant Coronary Artery Disease in the Korean Population. JAHA 2019, 8, e010541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winter, Y.; Wolfram, C.; Schaeg, M.; Reese, J.-P.; Oertel, W.H.; Dodel, R.; Back, T. Evaluation of costs and outcome in cardioembolic stroke or TIA. J. Neurol. 2009, 256, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coutts, S.B. Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack. Continuum (Minneap. Minn.) 2017, 23, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, S.D.; Blough, D.K.; Meyer, K.; Jarvik, J.G. Inpatient costs, length of stay, and mortality for cerebrovascular events in community hospitals. Neurology 2001, 57, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, P.; Khanal, D.; Madhavan, R.; Chaturvedi, S. Why do ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients get readmitted? J. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 307, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carlsson, A.; Irewall, A.-L.; Graipe, A.; Ulvenstam, A.; Mooe, T.; Ögren, J. Long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following ischemic stroke or TIA. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walker-Smith, T.; Joyce, K.; Maishman, R.; Smartt, H.; Hopkins, E.; Brierley, R.; Reeves, B.C.; Rogers, C.A.; Angelini, G.D.; Culliford, L. Outcome Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery (OMACS): A single-centre prospective cohort study of cardiac surgery patients. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e063268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Study Design and Exclusion Criteria.
Figure 2.
5 Year Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics.
| Index Surgery | Number of Cases | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Aortic Root | 1194 | 6.33% |
| CABG and AV | 1508 | 7.99% |
| CABG and MV | 615 | 3.26% |
| CABG and PV | 2 | 0.01% |
| CABG and TV | 26 | 0.14% |
| Double Valve | 1055 | 5.59% |
| Isolated AV | 2318 | 12.28% |
| Isolated CABG | 7725 | 40.93% |
| Isolated MV | 1305 | 6.91% |
| Isolated PV | 15 | 0.08% |
| Isolated TV | 111 | 0.59% |
| TAVR | 1575 | 8.34% |
| Triple Valve | 96 | 0.51% |
| Other | 1329 | 7.04% |
| Gender | ||
| Female Patients | 6500 | 34.40% |
| Male Patients | 12,374 | 65.60% |
| Race | ||
| White Patients | 17,474 | 92.50% |
| Black Patients | 910 | 4.80% |
| Other Races | 490 | 2.60% |
| Comorbidities | ||
| Diabetes | 7131 | 37.70% |
| Hypertension | 15,808 | 83.70% |
| COPD | 4665 | 24.72% |
| Peripheral Vascular Disease | 3807 | 20.17% |
| Cerebrovascular Disease | 4353 | 23.06% |
| Previous Myocardial Infarctions | 7857 | 41.60% |
| Previous Heart Failure | 5753 | 30.48% |
| Previous CABG | 1407 | 7.45% |
| Previous Valve Procedure | 1365 | 7.23% |
| Dialysis | 520 | 2.76% |
| Biodata | Median | q1–q3 |
| Median Age (years) | 68 | 59–76 |
| Body Mass Index | 28.73 | 25.26–33.10 |
| Last Creatine Level | 1 | 0.8–1.2 |
| Cross Clamp Time (min) | 86 | 62.00–121.00 |
| Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time (min) | 116 | 87.00–158.00 |
Table 2.
Multivariable model for longer hospitalization.
| Variable | HR (95% CI) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|
| PTIA | 2.199 (1.416–3.416) | <0.001 |
| Female | 1.216 (1.141–1.296) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes | 1.267 (1.191–1.349) | <0.001 |
| Prior Heart Failure | 1.421 (1.330–1.518) | <0.0001 |
| Cerebrovascular Accidents | 1.695 (1.534–1.873) | <0.0001 |
| Age | 0.993 (0.990–0.995) | <0.0001 |
Table 3.
Fine and gray modeling for readmission.
| Variable | Stroke Readmission HR (95% CI) | p-Value | All-Cause Readmission HR (95% CI) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes | 1.205 (1.091–1.330) | <0.001 | 1.248 (1.200–1.298) | <0.0001 |
| Cerebrovascular Accidents | 1.772 (1.545–2.033) | <0.001 | 1.196 (1.121–1.77) | <0.0001 |
| PTIA | 1.643 (0.913–2.956) | <0.10 | 1.444 (1.096–1.902) | <0.01 |
| Age | 1.003 (0.999–1.007) | <0.15 | 1.001 (0.999–1.002) | <0.45 |
| Female | 1.018 (0.919–1.128) | <0.75 | 1.077 (1.034–1.122) | <0.0001 |
| Prior Heart Failure | 1.065 (0.956–1.186) | <0.30 | 1.279 (1.226–1.334) | <0.0001 |
Table 4.
30-day MACCE and all MACCE.
| Variable | 30-Day MACCE HR (95% CI) | p-Value | All MACCE HR (95% CI) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.012 (1.007–1.017) | <0.0001 | 1.018 (1.016–1.020) | <0.0001 |
| Female | 1.240 (1.104–1.393) | <0.001 | 1.031 (0.985–1.080) | >0.19 |
| Diabetes | 1.231 (1.098–1.381) | <0.001 | 1.386 (1.326–1.449) | <0.001 |
| Prior Heart Failure | 1.516 (1.344–1.709) | <0.0001 | 1.551 (1.481–1.626) | <0.0001 |
| Cerebrovascular Accidents | 1.488 (1.263–1.754) | <0.0001 | 1.552 (1.450–1.660) | <0.0001 |
| PTIA | 0.524 (0.171–1.605) | >0.25 | 1.116 (0.825–1.509) | >0.45 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Jain, U.; Jain, B.; Brown, J.; Sultan, I.B.; Thoma, F.; Anetakis, K.M.; Balzer, J.R.; Subramaniam, K.; Yousef, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010027
AMA Style
Jain U, Jain B, Brown J, Sultan IB, Thoma F, Anetakis KM, Balzer JR, Subramaniam K, Yousef S, Wang Y, et al. Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2024; 11(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010027
Chicago/Turabian StyleJain, Urvish, Bhav Jain, James Brown, Ibrahim B. Sultan, Floyd Thoma, Katherine M. Anetakis, Jeffrey R. Balzer, Kathirvel Subramaniam, Sarah Yousef, Yisi Wang, and et al. 2024. "Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 11, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010027
APA StyleJain, U., Jain, B., Brown, J., Sultan, I. B., Thoma, F., Anetakis, K. M., Balzer, J. R., Subramaniam, K., Yousef, S., Wang, Y., Nogueira, R., & Thirumala, P. D. (2024). Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010027
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
