Next Article in Journal
Cardiovascular Risk Factors Predicting Cardiovascular and Cancer Deaths in a Middle-Aged Population Followed-Up for 61 Years until Extinction
Next Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Value of Strain by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Hypothermic Protocols for Neurocognitive Preservation in Aortic Arch Surgery: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solving the Riddle of Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The Added Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Noninvasive Mapping System for the Stereotactic Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Description

1
Department of Cardiology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy
3
Department of Medicine, LUM University, 70010 Casamassima, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equal contribution as first author.
These authors equal contribution as last author.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(8), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080239
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 24 July 2024 / Accepted: 1 August 2024 / Published: 5 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ventricular Arrhythmias: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment)

Abstract

:
Objectives: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) is a life-threatening condition that is often observed in patients with structural heart disease. Catheter ablation (CA) ablation is an effective and well-established treatment for the scar-related ventricular tachycardias (VTs). Sometimes, due to patient fragility or contraindications to CA, a noninvasive procedure is required. In these cases, VT ablation with stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for SMVTs supported by the CardioInsight mapping system seems to be a promising and effective noninvasive approach. Methods and results: We report a case of a 55-year-old male smoker and heavy alcohol consumer who developed ischemic heart disease and frequent refractory SMVT relative to antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation was not practicable due to the presence of an apical thrombosis in the left ventricle. The CardioInsightTM system (Cardioinsight Technologies Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) was useful for noninvasively mapping the VTs, identifying two target areas on the septum and anterior wall of the left ventricle. A personalized STAR treatment plan was carefully designed, and it was delivered in a few minutes. During follow-up, a significant reduction in the arrhythmia burden was documented. Conclusions: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation supported by the CardioInsight system could be an alternative treatment for VTs when catheter ablation is not possible. Larger studies are needed to investigate this technique.

1. Introduction

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia often occurring in structural heart disease. The prevention and termination of VT requires appropriate antiarrhythmic drugs and/or external or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) intervention (1). Three or more episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination via an intervention are classified as an electrical storm (ES). Previous studies have described poor outcomes associated with ES and an up to 3-fold increased risk of mortality in patients with ES [1,2,3,4].
Catheter ablation (CA) for VT can eliminate or reduce recurrent arrhythmia episodes in patients affected by ES [5,6,7,8,9].
In some cases, cardiac ablation is not feasible due to particular clinical conditions, such as the presence of a double mechanical valve in the mitro-aortic site or clot formations in the left ventricle. In these clinical conditions, noninvasive therapeutic alternatives are necessary. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) with precise high-dose radiation to define targets, potentially guided by previous cardiac diagnostic tools, was used to treat these patients [10,11,12]. It is crucial to collect all available pieces of information about the arrhythmogenic substrate to identify the critical isthmus of VTs in order to define an accurate treatment plan. Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is a mapping technique aiming to noninvasively characterize cardiac electrical activity [13]. ECGI employs body surface electrodes combined with patient-specific computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging-derived epicardial geometry to display the full sequence of electrical activity during a single beat over the whole heart, hence providing a panoramic map of the arrhythmia. This is achieved using an inverse method described previously [14,15] and provides sufficient resolution to identify myocardial segments with sites of earliest activation in VT, but the method is not able to identify slow conduction/fragmented potentials, as well as VT isthmuses [16]. The commercial ECGI system CardioInsight (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) has recently become available for clinical applications [13,16].

2. Case Presentation

The clinical case focuses on a 52-year-old male smoker and heavy alcohol consumer with a family history of ischemic heart disease. His cardiological history began in 2017 when he went to the emergency room due to epigastric pain. Sustained VT was diagnosed and treated effectively with DC shocks. The ECG with the sinus rhythm showed q waves in the anterior–lateral leads, which corresponded with necrosis (Figure 1).
Severe left ventricular dilatation, apical thrombosis, and severe impairment of LV systolic function (EF 21%) were found in the echocardiogram. Angiography was performed, and a left anterior descending artery occlusion was found. Since 68% necrosis of the left ventricle was present upon myocardial scintigraphy, no revascularization was performed. He underwent a dual chamber ICD implantation and started oral anticoagulation therapy.
Despite an up-titration of antiarrhythmic therapy in the following years (maximum dosage of beta-blockers, amiodarone, and mexiletine), frequent VT recurrences were documented. The episodes were effectively treated by ICD shock (Figure 2).
A CA of VT was not possible due to the persistence of left ventricle apical thrombosis (Figure 3). After a careful evaluation of all possible treatments (for example, alcohol ablation or intramural needle ablation) [17], the patients underwent STAR. However, the question of which area of LV to target during STAR was a challenging problem. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was not performed due to the patient’s claustrophobia and refusal of general anesthesia. The presence of the defibrillator with two catheters would also have reduced the quality of the images.
A noninvasive mapping of VTs using CardioInsight was performed. The 252-electrode vest was applied to the patient’s torso and connected to the system. A CT scan allowed the definition of cardiac anatomy and the position of each electrode on the torso. LV geometry was then reconstructed to obtain a three-dimensional mesh. This model serves as the projection of unipolar signals represented by virtual nodes of the epicardial surface. The collected signals are post-processed using mathematical reconstruction algorithms to create different maps, including activation maps, voltage maps, isopotential maps, and phase maps [13].
A programmed ventricular stimulation was performed using the ICD, and two VTs were induced (Figure 4). The CardioInsight system mapped the VTs noninvasively and studied the areas of maximum slowing. The system identified the middle septum and anterior wall of the left ventricle as target areas (Figure 5).
Thanks to cooperative work with radiation oncologists and medical physicists, a personalized treatment plan was created to deliver an effective high dose of radiation to the target areas, minimizing exposure to nearby organs at risk [12]. The clinical target volume (CTV) was identified in accordance with radiation oncology and cardiology, considering the scar area based on anatomical CT imaging. Based on the 4D-CT acquisition, an internal target volume (ITV) was added to CTVs in order to compensate for respiratory motion. Finally, the planning target volume (PTV) was defined by adding 0–2 mm to the ITV (Figure 6).
The ICD lead was completely excluded from the treatment plan. In particular, the patient was immobilized in the supine position using a vac-lock bag, and three CTs were performed: basic free-breathing CT for dose calculations, four-dimensional CT for moving evaluation, and CT with contrast for anatomical accuracy. Several organs at risk were contoured, paying more attention to the esophagus and main bronchus, for which a planning risk volume was built.
In February 2023, STAR was performed via free breathing with a planning target volume prescription total dose of 25 Gy/1 fraction. For OARs, all dose constraints were respected [18] (esophagus max dose of 5.5 Gy, aorta max dose of 1.6 Gy, superior vena cava max dose of 5.1 Gy, and inferior vena cava max dose of 0.3 Gy). The heart–PTV mean dose was 4.7 Gy.
The treatment was generated, optimized, and delivered via TrueBeamTM (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) involves the use of cone-beam CT to capture detailed images of a patient’s anatomy before the treatment session, allowing for the precise targeting of the area to be treated and minimizing setup errors. In addition, surface-guided radiotherapy with Align-RT is used to monitor and adjust patient positioning in real time during treatment. These advanced techniques enhanced the overall precision and safety of the STAR process (Figure 7).
The treatment lasted 3 min, and no acute complications were documented. The patient was quickly discharged in good clinical condition. At the post-STAR echocardiography, the LV systolic function remained unchanged. The patient was discharged with mexiletine therapy, and amiodarone was discontinued.
After three months of clinical well-being observation, the patient reported a new single episode of VT treated with ICD shock in June 2023 (12-lead ECG showing VT was not available; cycle length of VT was different from that of previously treated VT). No other VT episodes or side effects due to STAR were documented after a one-year follow-up.

3. Discussion

The introduction of STAR offers a new treatment option for patients with recurrent episodes of VT when cardiac ablation is not feasible [10,11,12]. There is still debate regarding whether STAR has a predominant effect in the early or late period after the procedure. The majority of studies claimed that the time course of the decline in VT attacks after STAR was acute [19,20]; in contrast, Neuwirth et al. [21] and, more recently, Kautzner et al. [22] indicated that STAR had predominantly delayed effects after 6–12 months due to progression of fibrosis. The effects of radioablation seemed to occur immediately after the procedure, implying that the reduction in VT burden cannot be attributed solely to fibrosis but previous studies reported that myocardial inflammation and structural changes can be induced within a month after STAR [23,24,25]
STAR can be used for immediate antiarrhythmic palliation in critically ill patients with otherwise untreatable refractory VT and ES. The CardioInsight system is a very useful tool for optimizing the effectiveness of STAR by generating accurate activation maps and optimizing the radiotherapy treatment plan. Prior studies [16] have shown that the distance between the VT isthmus performed using electroanatomical mapping (sites of entrainment, pace-mapping, and termination using CARTO, Biosense-Webster) and sites of earliest activation in ECG imaging (CardioInsight, Medtronic) was 22.6 mm (median). This simultaneous assessment demonstrates that CardioInsight localizes VT circuits with sufficient accuracy to provide a region of interest for ablation. The resolution, however, is not sufficient for guiding discrete radiofrequency lesion delivery via CA without the concomitant use of an electroanatomical mapping system, but it may be sufficient for segmental ablation with radiotherapy [16].
In fact, in contrast to traditional tumor RT planning, the arrhythmogenic substrate cannot be directly visualized on the 4D-CT scan, making target definition and delineation more complex. Therefore, the delineation process is based on a collaborative and subjective synthesis of many variables. To date, no clinically validated methods or commercial products are available for transporting the identified arrhythmogenic targets from the electroanatomical mapping systems to the radiation oncology treatment planning systems. Imaging techniques such as MRI and CT scans are often used, and they are able to identify, in areas of dense fibrosis, corridors and areas of tissue that are potentially capable of generating reentry circuits. These techniques, when used as the only method to establish the target volume, risk the resultant treatment of areas not responsible for the arrhythmia. The possibility of visualizing early activation during VT using the CardioInsight system is a very useful method for improving STAR.

4. Conclusions

The introduction of STAR guided by the CardioInsight system offers a new treatment option for patients with recurrent episodes of VT when cardiac ablation is not feasible. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this technique.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.M., A.F. and M.G.; methodology, A.D.M., A.F., A.S., I.R., F.D.G. and I.B.; data curation I.R. and N.V.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R., A.D.M. and A.F.; writing—review and editing, I.R., A.D.M., A.F. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this article.

References

  1. Zeppenfeld, K.; Tfelt-Hansen, J.; De Riva, M.; Winkel, B.G.; Behr, E.R.; Blom, N.A.; Charron, P.; Corrado, D.; Dagres, N.; De Chillou, C.; et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3997–4126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Conti, S.; Pala, S.; Biagioli, V.; Del Giorno, G.; Zucchetti, M.; Russo, E.; Marino, V.; Russo, A.D.; Casella, M.; Pizzamiglio, F.; et al. Electrical storm: A clinical and electrophysiological overview. World J. Cardiol. 2015, 7, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Exner, D.V.; Pinski, S.L.; Wyse, D.G.; Renfroe, E.G.; Follmann, D.; Gold, M.; Beckman, K.J.; Coromolas, J.; Lancaster, S.; Hallstrom, A.P. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation 2001, 103, 2066–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bencardino, G.; DI Monaco, A.; Rio, T.; Frontera, A.; Santangeli, P.; Leo, M.; Pelargonio, G.; Perna, F.; Narducci, M.L.; Gabrielli, F.; et al. The association between ICD interventions and mortality is independent of their modality: Clinical implications. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2014, 25, 1363–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carbucicchio, C.; Santamaria, M.; Trevisi, N.; Maccabelli, G.; Giraldi, F.; Fassini, G.; Riva, S.; Moltrasio, M.; Cireddu, M.; Veglia, F.; et al. Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Short- and long-term outcomes in a prospective single-center study. Circulation 2008, 117, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Deneke, T.; Shin, D.-I.; Lawo, T.; Bösche, L.; Balta, O.; Anders, H.; Bünz, K.; Horlitz, M.; Grewe, P.H.; Lemke, B.; et al. Catheter ablation of electrical storm in a collaborative hospital network. Am. J. Cardiol. 2011, 108, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kozeluhova, M.; Peichl, P.; Cihak, R.; Wichterle, D.; Vancura, V.; Bytesnik, J.; Kautzner, J. Catheter ablation of electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease. Europace 2011, 13, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vergara, P.; Tung, R.; Vaseghi, M.; Brombin, C.; Frankel, D.; Di Biase, L.; Nagashima, K.; Tedrow, U.; Tzou, W.S.; Sauer, W.H.; et al. Successful ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with electrical storm reduces recurrences and improves survival. Heart Rhythm. 2018, 15, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Di Monaco, A.; Quadrini, F.; Troisi, F.; Vitulano, N.; Caruso, R.; Duni, N.; Cecere, G.; Guida, P.; Langialonga, T.; Grimaldi, M. Cardiopulmonary support in patients undergoing catheter ablation of poorly tolerated ventricular arrhythmias and electrical storm. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2019, 30, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cuculich, P.S.; Schill, M.R.; Kashani, R.; Mutic, S.; Lang, A.; Cooper, D.; Faddis, M.; Gleva, M.; Noheria, A.; Smith, T.W.; et al. Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2325–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fiorentino, A.; Di Monaco, A.; Surgo, A.; Vitulano, N.; Gregucci, F.; Ludovico, E.; Carbonara, R.; Quadrini, F.; Rubini, G.; Bonaparte, I.; et al. Linac Based STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) of Ventricular Tachycardia: Case report and literature review. Clin. Case Rep. 2020, 9, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bonaparte, I.; Gregucci, F.; Surgo, A.; Di Monaco, A.; Vitulano, N.; Ludovico, E.; Carbonara, R.; Ciliberti, M.P.; Quadrini, F.; Grimaldi, M.; et al. Linac-based STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) for ventricular tachycardia: A treatment planning study. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2021, 39, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cheniti, G.; Puyo, S.; Martin, C.A.; Frontera, A.; Vlachos, K.; Takigawa, M.; Bourier, F.; Kitamura, T.; Lam, A.; Dumas-Pommier, C.; et al. Noninvasive Mapping and Electrocardiographic Imaging in Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias (CardioInsight). Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 2019, 11, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Y.; Rudy, Y. Application of the method of fundamental solutions to potential-based inverse electrocardiography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 34, 1272–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oster, H.S.; Taccardi, B.; Lux, R.L.; Ershler, P.R.; Rudy, Y. Electrocardiographic imaging: Noninvasive characterization of intramural myocardial activation from inverse-reconstructed epicardial potentials and electrograms. Circulation 1998, 97, 1496–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Graham, A.J.; Orini, M.; Zacur, E.; Dhillon, G.; Daw, H.; Srinivasan, N.T.; Martin, C.; Lane, J.; Mansell, J.S.; Cambridge, A.; et al. Evaluation of ECG Imaging to Map Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmias. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2020, 13, e007377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Romero, J.; Shivkumar, K.; Valderrabano, M.; Diaz, J.C.; Alviz, I.; Briceno, D.; Natale, A.; Di Biase, L. Modern mapping and ablation techniques to treat ventricular arrhythmias from the left ventricular summit and interventricular septum. Heart Rhythm. 2020, 17, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Boda-Heggemann, J.; Blanck, O.; Mehrhof, F.; Ernst, F.; Buergy, D.; Fleckenstein, J.; Tülümen, E.; Krug, D.; Siebert, F.-A.; Zaman, A.; et al. Interdisciplinary Clinical Target Volume Generation for Cardiac Radioablation: Multicenter Benchmarking for the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA) Trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021, 110, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gianni, C.; Rivera, D.; Burkhardt, J.D.; Pollard, B.; Gardner, E.; Maguire, P.; Zei, P.C.; Natale, A.; Al-Ahmad, A. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for refractory scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2020, 17, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Knutson, N.C.; Samson, P.P.; Hugo, G.D.; Goddu, S.M.; Reynoso, F.J.; Kavanaugh, J.A.; Mutic, S.; Moore, K.; Hilliard, J.; Cuculich, P.S.; et al. Radiation therapy workflow and dosimetric analysis from a phase 1/2 trial of noninvasive cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019, 104, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Neuwirth, R.; Cvek, J.; Knybel, L.; Jiravsky, O.; Molenda, L.; Kodaj, M.; Fiala, M.; Peichl, P.; Feltl, D.; Januška, J.; et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Europace 2019, 21, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kautzner, J.; Jedlickova, K.; Sramko, M.; Peichl, P.; Cvek, J.; Ing, L.K.; Neuwirth, R.; Jiravsky, O.; Voska, L.; Kucera, T. Radiation-induced changes in ventricular myocardium after stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2021, 7, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. van der Ree, M.H.; Blanck, O.; Limpens, J.; Lee, C.H.; Balgobind, B.V.; Dieleman, E.M.; Wilde, A.A.; Zei, P.C.; de Groot, J.R.; Slotman, B.J.; et al. Cardiac radioablation—A systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2020, 17, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, D.M.; Navara, R.; Yin, T.; Szymanski, J.; Goldsztejn, U.; Kenkel, C.; Lang, A.; Mpoy, C.; Lipovsky, C.E.; Qiao, Y.; et al. Cardiac radiotherapy induces electrical conduction repro-gramming in the absence of transmural fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, S.; Luo, H.; Mao, T.; Xiang, C.; Hu, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Yu, L.; et al. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: A novel therapy for cardiac arrhythmia. Heart Rhythm. 2023, 20, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Electrocardiogram showing the sinus rhythm and signs of myocardial necrosis in anterior–lateral leads.
Figure 1. Electrocardiogram showing the sinus rhythm and signs of myocardial necrosis in anterior–lateral leads.
Jcdd 11 00239 g001
Figure 2. Summary of the patient’s medical history.
Figure 2. Summary of the patient’s medical history.
Jcdd 11 00239 g002
Figure 3. Echocardiographic image (parasternal long axis) showing a severely dilated left ventricle with apical thrombosis (red arrows).
Figure 3. Echocardiographic image (parasternal long axis) showing a severely dilated left ventricle with apical thrombosis (red arrows).
Jcdd 11 00239 g003
Figure 4. Ventricular tachycardias induced by programmed ventricular stimulation using ICD. The red arrows correspond to the stimulated beats.
Figure 4. Ventricular tachycardias induced by programmed ventricular stimulation using ICD. The red arrows correspond to the stimulated beats.
Jcdd 11 00239 g004
Figure 5. Noninvasive mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) using the CardioInsight system. Two VTs were induced and mapped. On the left, the system identified the anterior wall as the site of earliest activation during the VT1 (red area). On the right, the system identified the middle septum as the site of earliest activation during VT2 (red area). The right anterior oblique (RAO) projection is shown for all images.
Figure 5. Noninvasive mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) using the CardioInsight system. Two VTs were induced and mapped. On the left, the system identified the anterior wall as the site of earliest activation during the VT1 (red area). On the right, the system identified the middle septum as the site of earliest activation during VT2 (red area). The right anterior oblique (RAO) projection is shown for all images.
Jcdd 11 00239 g005
Figure 6. Treatment plan for STAR. The area outlined by the red line corresponds to the Clinical target volume (CTV). The area outlined by the blue line corresponds to the Planning target volume (PTV). The area outlined by the pink area corresponds to the heart volume.
Figure 6. Treatment plan for STAR. The area outlined by the red line corresponds to the Clinical target volume (CTV). The area outlined by the blue line corresponds to the Planning target volume (PTV). The area outlined by the pink area corresponds to the heart volume.
Jcdd 11 00239 g006
Figure 7. Dose distribution and treatment plan shown in sagittal CT images (left) and coronal plan (right). The areas outlined by the yellow, violet and red lines correspond to the organs at risk (OARs). The area outlined by the pink area corresponds to the heart volume. Colored areas correspond to isodose level of RTplan. Notice that the ICD lead was excluded from treatment (red arrow).
Figure 7. Dose distribution and treatment plan shown in sagittal CT images (left) and coronal plan (right). The areas outlined by the yellow, violet and red lines correspond to the organs at risk (OARs). The area outlined by the pink area corresponds to the heart volume. Colored areas correspond to isodose level of RTplan. Notice that the ICD lead was excluded from treatment (red arrow).
Jcdd 11 00239 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romanazzi, I.; Di Monaco, A.; Bonaparte, I.; Valenti, N.; Surgo, A.; Di Guglielmo, F.; Fiorentino, A.; Grimaldi, M. Noninvasive Mapping System for the Stereotactic Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Description. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080239

AMA Style

Romanazzi I, Di Monaco A, Bonaparte I, Valenti N, Surgo A, Di Guglielmo F, Fiorentino A, Grimaldi M. Noninvasive Mapping System for the Stereotactic Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Description. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2024; 11(8):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romanazzi, Imma, Antonio Di Monaco, Ilaria Bonaparte, Noemi Valenti, Alessia Surgo, Fiorella Di Guglielmo, Alba Fiorentino, and Massimo Grimaldi. 2024. "Noninvasive Mapping System for the Stereotactic Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Description" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 11, no. 8: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080239

APA Style

Romanazzi, I., Di Monaco, A., Bonaparte, I., Valenti, N., Surgo, A., Di Guglielmo, F., Fiorentino, A., & Grimaldi, M. (2024). Noninvasive Mapping System for the Stereotactic Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Description. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11(8), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11080239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop