Next Article in Journal
A Countermeasure Strategy against Peramine Developed by Chilesia rudis in the Endophyte–Ryegrass–Herbivore Model
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Effect of Indole-3-Aldehyde in Murine COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Characterization of High-Molecular-Weight Proteins Secreted by Plasmodiophora brassicae That Suppress Plant Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/jof10080511
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnaporthe-Unique Gene MUG1 Is Important for Fungal Appressorial Penetration, Invasive Hyphal Extension, and Virulence in Rice Blast Fungi

by
Huixia Zhang
1,2,
Zhiyi Chen
1,2,
Zechen Yu
1,2,
Liu Tang
1,2,
Wenqiang Gao
1,2,
Xunli Lu
1 and
Jun Yang
1,2,*
1
MARA Key Laboratory of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
MARA Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Department of Plant Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(8), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080511
Submission received: 26 June 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 20 July 2024 / Published: 23 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Growth and Virulence of Plant Pathogenic Fungi)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Species-unique genes that encode specific proteins and have no homologs in other species play certain roles in the evolution of species and adaptations to external environments. Nevertheless, the biological roles of unique genes in plant pathogenic fungi remain largely unknown. Here, four Magnaporthe-unique genes (MUG1–MUG4), which were highly expressed during the early infection stages, were functionally characterized in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Subcellular localization assays revealed that Mug1, Mug2, and Mug4 were localized to the cytoplasm and that Mug3 was localized into the nuclei. Furthermore, through gene knockout and phenotypic analysis, only MUG1 was found to be indispensable for fungal virulence and conidiation. Detailed microscopic analysis revealed that the deletion mutants of MUG1 clearly exhibited reduced appressorial turgor pressure and invasive hyphal development. Taken together, our findings indicate that the Magnaporthe-unique gene MUG1 plays a vital role in infection-related morphogenesis and virulence in rice blast fungi and suggest the specific and important roles of species-unique genes.

1. Introduction

Species-unique genes refer to proteins encoded in specific taxa that are endemic and have no homologous sequences in other species [1,2]. Compared with non-unique genes, species-unique genes are short, contain few introns and detectable domains, are moderately expressed, evolve fast, and participate in species-specific adaptation processes [3,4]. Species-unique genes are supposed to originate from two mechanisms, the duplication divergence model and the de novo model, and play important roles in the evolution and adaptation of organisms to external environments [5,6]. Species-unique genes might have important roles in the development of novel traits, the adaptation to new ecological niches, and the emergence of lineage-specific phenotypes [7]. Species-unique genes are also involved in species-specific biological processes and pathways and might contribute to the unique characteristics of different lineages [8,9]. Understanding their origin and function helps in unraveling the mechanisms underlying the emergence of biological diversity and the evolution of complex traits [7].
With the continuous development of sequencing technology, an increasing number of species-unique genes have been identified, which comprise 10–20% of all annotated genes in a species [1,10]. They are supposed to be responsible for the development, reproduction, and survival and to contribute to the genetic diversity and evolutionary success of a species by adapting to its external environment and ecological niche [3,11,12,13]. In pathogenic fungi, most species-unique genes have not been functionally characterized. To date, only a few have been reported. For example, EED1, a gene unique to Candida albicans, plays an important role in maintaining filamentous growth and mycelium expansion on the host surface [14]. OSP24, the gene unique to the wheat head scab pathogen Fusarium graminearum, is required for the growth of infection hyphae in wheat germ tissue, although it has no effects on mycelial growth and primary infection [2].
Presently, Magnaporthe oryzae, which causes devastating rice blast disease across the world, is used as a model for functional genomics among plant pathogenic fungi [15]. This fungus employs a unique structure called the appressorium to penetrate the rice plant’s leaf surface and initiate successful infection with bulbous invasive hyphae [16]. In the past two decades, hundreds of genes have been identified and functionally characterized by forward and reverse genetics approaches to this pathogen [17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, only a few Magnaporthe-unique genes have been reported to play certain roles in fungal pathogenicity. In M. oryzae, more than a dozen of species-unique genes, including MoSPC1-MoSPC7, MIR1, and MoHKR1-MoHKR7, which are highly expressed during the infection stage, have been identified but only MoHKR1 has been found to play crucial roles in plant infection [1,4,21]. Based on the data of the expression profile at different developmental and infection stages of M. oryzae, genes highly expressed at the early infection stage and playing roles during plant infection were identified [22], among which four genes unique to Magnaporthe, named as MUG1-MUG4 (Magnaporthe oryzae unique genes) in this study, were selected for analysis. Of these four genes, MUG1 was indispensable for fungal infection-related morphogenesis and plant infection. We also investigated the subcellular localization of these four Magnaporthe-unique proteins.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Growth Conditions

The wild-type strain P131 [23], the deletion mutants of MUG1, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4, and their various transformants generated in this study were cultured at 28 °C on oatmeal tomato agar (OTA) plates [24]. Two-day-old mycelia shaken in a liquid complete medium (CM) at 160 rpm were collected and then used to isolate nucleic acids, proteins, and protoplasts. The isolated protoplasts were transformed using the PEG/CaCl2 method [25]. Media supplemented with 250 µg/mL hygromycin B (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or 400 µg/mL neomycin (Ameresco, Framingham, MA, USA) were used to select hygromycin-resistant or neomycin-resistant transformants, respectively [26]. To assess mycelial growth and colony characteristics, fungi were cultivated on OTA plates at 28 °C for 120 h, as previously described [16]. Conidia harvested from conidiation plates were used for the virulence test and infection process observation [27].

2.2. Nucleic Acid Manipulation

Genomic DNAs were extracted from vegetative hyphae with the CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) protocol [28]. Standard protocols of molecular biology were followed for plasmid isolation, Southern blotting analyses, and DNA enzymatic digestion [15]. Probes were labeled with the random primer labeling kit (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan). Plasmid constructs were sequenced by the TSINGKE company (TSINGKE, Beijing, China). All primers (Supplementary Table S1) were synthesized by the TSINGKE company.

2.3. Generation of the MUG Gene Deletion Mutant

To generate the MUG gene deletion vector pkov21:MUG1, pkov21:MUG2, pkov21:MUG3, and pkov21:MUG4, the 1.2–1.5 kb upstream and downstream sequences of MUG genes were amplified with the paired primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 [27]. The resulting PCR products were cloned into the restriction enzyme restriction sites of pkov21 [29,30]. The MUG1, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4 gene deletion vectors pkov21:MUG1, pkov21:MUG2, pkov21:MUG3, and pkov21:MUG4 were transformed into protoplasts of P131. Hygromycin-resistant transformants were isolated and assayed for resistance to neomycin. The transformants were screened by PCR with primer pairs MUG1, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4 Check-F/Hpt-Up and Check-R/Hpt-down (Supplementary Table S1). The putative MUG genes deletion mutants were further confirmed by Southern blotting.

2.4. Complementation Strains

For complementation strains, a fragment containing the 1.5-kb promoter region and the MUG1 gene coding region was amplified and cloned into the plasmid pKN (Supplementary Table S1) [31]. The complementation vector was transformed into the MUG1ko1 mutant protoplast. The CM plates were supplemented with 400 µg/mL neomycin (Amresco, Famingham, MA, USA) to select the complementation transformants.

2.5. Construction of the Mug-eGFP Fusion Strains

Vectors were constructed for subcellular localization studies involving the MUG1, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4 genes. The MUG1, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4 genes were amplified and ligated into the C-terminus of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene to the pKNRG vector [29]. This vector contains the constitutive RP27 promoter, which drives the expression of pKNRG-Mugs-GFP fusion proteins. The vectors pKNRG-Mugs-GFP were generated by amplifying the MUG genes with the primer pair Mug-GFP F/R (Supplementary Table S1). Linearized pKNRG-Mugs-GFP was then transformed into protoplasts and selected on solid CM with 400 μg/mL neomycin. In the end, all of the resulting transformants were assayed by observing the green fluorescence signals under a confocal microscope (Nikon Fluorescence microscopy Ni90, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) [32].

2.6. Plant Inoculation Assay

Four-week-old seedlings of rice cultivar ‘LTH’ and barley cultivar ‘E8’ were used for infection assays. For the infection assay, conidial suspensions with a concentration of 5 × 104 conidia/mL were sprayed onto rice leaves and 2 × 104 conidia/mL were sprayed onto barley leaves; alternatively, conidial suspensions with a concentration of 1 × 105 conidia/mL were used to inoculate wound leaves and then incubated as previously described [24,33]. Disease lesions were examined and photographed 5–7 days post inoculation (dpi).

2.7. Microscopy

Conidial suspensions with a concentration of 2 × 105 conidia/mL were used to inoculate barley epidermis cells; the infection process was observed at 24 and 36 h post inoculation (hpi) [34]. The samples were observed and photographed under a Nikon Ni90 fluorescence microscope [15,27]. A rectangular plug of the culture was cut from an OTA plate and placed on a glass slide. Conidiation was observed and photographed under a Nikon SMZ800N stereomicroscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) [25]. A conidial suspension (5 × 104 conidia/mL) was placed on a microscope cover glass under humid conditions at 28 °C in darkness and the samples were microscopically observed at intervals to measure appressorium formation [35]. The percentages of conidia forming appressoria was determined by microscopic examination of at least 100 conidia for more than three times. The appressorium turgor was measured using an incipient cytorrhysis (cell collapse) assay with 1–3 M glycerol solution [36]. The experiments were repeated three times and more than 100 appressoria were observed for each replicate.

2.8. Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA samples were extracted with an RNA extraction kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) from vegetative hyphae grown in liquid CM, conidia produced on OTA plates, appressoria formed on hydrophobic film surfaces, and infected-barley leaves inoculated with conidial suspensions [37]. The crude RNA was pretreated with DNase I (Takara) and was then reverse transcribed with a PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit (Takara). The qRT-PCR was performed on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Actin gene (MGG_03982) was used as an endogenous control. To compare the relative abundance of target transcripts, a mycelial sample was used as a calibrator and the average threshold cycle (Ct) was normalized to the Actin gene for each of the treated samples as described [38].

3. Results

3.1. Four Magnaporthe-Unique Genes Were Highly Expressed during the Fungal Early Infection Stage

The four Magnaporthe-unique genes MUG1 to MUG4 had no or only one intron, i.e., MUG1 (MGG_12307), MUG2 (MGG_15077), and MUG3 (MGG_16034) were a singleton of 297, 321, and 603 bp, respectively, and MUG4 (MGG_17927) was 319 bp with one intron. Their expression patterns were measured using qRT-PCR in samples originating from vegetative hyphae (MY), conidia (CO), appressoria formed on hydrophobic film surfaces at 3 and 12 hpi (H3 and H12), and infected barley leaves at 18, 24, and 42 hpi (I18, I24, and I42), respectively. All four genes had relatively low expression levels in MY and I42 (Figure 1A–D). Nevertheless, MUG1 and MUG3 had the highest expression level in I18 and MUG2 and MUG4 had the highest expression level in H3, all of which were over 50-fold greater than that in MY (Figure 1A–D). Moreover, MUG1 and MUG2 also had a higher expression level in CO, over 20-fold more than that in MY (Figure 1A,B). Overall, the four Magnaporthe-unique genes, MUG1-MUG4, were all highly expressed during the early infection stage of M. oryzae.

3.2. Mug1, Mug2, and Mug4 Were Localized into the Cytolasm and Mug3 Was a Nuclear Protein

To investigate the function of MUG genes, four gene deletion vectors were constructed by replacing the open reading frame of MUG genes with the hygromycin cassette and transforming into wild-type strain P131. Putative MUG gene deletion transformants were screened using PCR and the resulting transformants were verified by DNA gel blot. The analysis revealed that two MUG1 gene-deletion mutants, MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2, had longer bands (4.2 kb) than the wild-type band (1.7 kb) after SalI digestion (Figure S1A). Similarly, the MUG2 gene-deletion mutant MUG2ko1, MUG3 gene-deletion mutant MUG3ko1, and MUG4 gene-deletion mutant MUG4ko1 were verified by DNA gel blot analysis (Figure S1B–D).
To determine the subcellular localization of the four Mug proteins, their N- and C-terminal fused GFP were generated and transformed into the corresponding gene knockout mutants but no GFP signals were observed at any of the developmental stages. A similar strategy was applied by constitutively expressing the GFP-fused proteins with the RP27 promoter. For the mug1 deletion mutants, the Mug1–GFP fusion restored the defects in plant infection and conidiation. Strong GFP signals were evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of conidia (Co), appressorium (Ap), invasive hyphae (IH), and vegetative mycelia (VH) of transformants expressing Mug1–GFP (Figure 2A). Similarly, Mug2-GFP was also evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of all tissues (Figure 2B) and Mug3-GFP was concentrated in the nuclei (Figure 2C). Mug4-GFP was also a cytoplasmic protein, although it seemed unevenly distributed in conidia and vegetative mycelia (Figure 2D).

3.3. MUG1 Was Indispensable for Full Virulence

To determine whether MUG genes were required for plant infection, conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 were sprayed onto the seedlings of susceptible rice cultivar ‘LTH’. All strains MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 generated comparative disease lesions with strain P131, while strain MUG1ko1 produced noticeably fewer lesions under the same condition (Figure 3A). Statistically, MUG1ko1 caused approximately 0.9 cm2 disease areas, on average, on 5 cm leaves, which were significantly smaller than that with 3.5 cm2 disease areas caused by strains P131, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 (Figure 3B). Similar results were obtained by inoculating the barley seedlings (Figure 3C,D). Furthermore, when the conidia were used to inoculate abraded rice leaves, strain MUG1ko1 caused disease lesions that were 3.0 mm in length on average, compared to 7.0-mm long lesions caused by strains P131, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 (Figure 3E,F). Therefore, MUG1, but not other MUG genes, were required for fungal virulence.

3.4. MUG1 Was Required for Appressorium Turgor Pressure and Invasive Hyphal Growth

To clarify the reason for reduced virulence by the deletion of MUG1, the infection processes of strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 were investigated. First, the percentages of appressorium formation by strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 were indistinguishable from those of wild-type strain P131 on hydrophobic glass cover slides (Figure 4A). Second, the internal concentration of solute and the turgor pressure within the appressoria were measured by the incipient cytorrhysis assay using glycerol [36]. At 1 M glycerol, the appressorium collapse rate was approximately around 62% in strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 compared with 40% in strain P131 (Figure 4B); similar results were obtained with 2 M glycerol (Figure 4B), suggesting that the turgor pressure in the appressoria of strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 was seriously reduced. Third, the development of invasive hyphae was investigated by using the conidia to inoculate epidermal cells of barley leaves and was divided into four stages: AP, only appressoria; invasive hyphae (IH) with 1 branch, including appressoria with penetration pegs or primary (IH); IH with two branches; and IH ≥ 3 branches, IH with at least three branches (Figure 4C). At 24 hpi, only 30% IH was observed under the MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 appressoria, while approximately 60% of the P131 appressoria formed branches of IH. At 36 hpi, approximately 90% of the P131 appressoria formed IH ≥ 3 branches, whereas about 40% of the MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 IH formed IH ≥ 3 branches (Figure 4D), signifying that the development of the IH of strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 in host plant cells was severely impaired. All above defects of strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 could be rescued in transformants MUG1com1 and MUG1com2, which expressed a wild-type MUG1 allele in strain MUG1ko1 (Figure 4A–D). Overall, these findings suggest that MUG1 regulates appressorial turgor pressure and invasive hyphae extension, thus contributing to the attenuated virulence of MUG1 deletion mutants.

3.5. MUG1 Was Important for Conidiation

The asexual development of the deletion mutants of the MUG genes was assayed by culturing the strains on OTA plates. As expected, there were no differences between these mug deletion mutants and strain P131 (Figure 5A,B). Nevertheless, the mug1 deletion mutants, but not others, exhibited defects in conidiation and produced 0.9 × 107 conidia per plate, which was about two-thirds of that of the wild-type strains (Figure 5C). Moreover, strains MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2 produced fewer conidiophores with no more than 4 conidia on each conidiophore, while strain P131 produced abundant conidiophores and 3–10 conidia per conidiophore (Figure 5D). These findings suggest that MUG1 plays an important role in conidiation.

4. Discussion

In pathogenic fungi, species-unique genes with high expression levels during the infection stage are considered to be important for fungal virulence. The Fusarium-unique gene OSP24 is highly expressed during the infection of wheat heads and is required for IH development and fungal virulence [2]. The Magnaporthe-unique gene MoHKR1 was also highly expressed during rice leaf infection and is required for IH growth and fungal virulence [4]. Similar to MoHKR1, another Magnaporthe-unique gene, MUG1, reported in this study, was also required for appressorial turgor generation, IH development, and fungal virulence. Consequently, it will be interesting to investigate the underlying mechanisms of how these species-unique genes regulate fungal virulence by uncovering their interacting proteins and signaling pathways.
Genes whose deletion cause minor roles in fungal virulence and asexual development might contribute to adapting to complicated external environments. For example, a combination of the transcriptome and proteome of an obligate psychrophilic fungus Mrakia psychrophile, treated at 4, 12, and 20 °C, indicated that 469 of 1276 Mrakia-unique genes were differentially expressed, suggesting their important roles in adapting to cold stress [39]. In M. oryzae, the deletion of individual species-unique genes MoSPC1, MoSPC2, MoSPC3, and MoSPC7 caused no detected phenotypes on fungal pathogenicity [1]. The deletion of the species-unique gene MIR1, which is specially expressed during plant infection, also causes no detectable changes in fungal pathogenicity [21]. Thus, we speculate that these species-unique genes including the three in this study, MUG2, MUG3, and MUG4, might be important for the fitness and virulence of M. oryzae under field conditions.
In contrast to avirulence proteins specific to a subset of isolates of a certain species, species-unique proteins are highly conserved within the species. Hence, fungal virulence- or pathogenicity-essential species-unique proteins are supposed to be ideal targets for developing green fungicides. If active chemical compounds are developed by targeting unique domains of motifs in these proteins, they should be very effective at inhibiting the infection by a specific fungus and have non-toxic side effects on other fungal species, plants, and animals [4,33]. For example, the Magnaporthe-unique effector protein MoErs1 is indispensable for fungal virulence by inhibiting the function of rice papain-like cysteine protease OsRD21 involved in rice immunity and an active small chemical FY21001, which specifically binds to and inhibits MoErs1 function and significantly and effectively controls rice blast [40]. The Rhizoctonia cerealis-unique effector protein RcOSP1 impairs wheat biological processes and suppressed pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity during the fungal infection process; silencing RcOSP1 can inhibit fungal growth through host and spray-induced gene silencing approaches [41]. Therefore, the identification of fungal virulence- or pathogenicity-essential species-unique proteins will open up an avenue for identifying novel fungicide-target proteins.
In summary, in this study, we functionally characterized four Magnaporthe-unique genes and found that MUG1 plays a vital role in infection-related morphogenesis and conidiation in rice blast fungi, which might be a potential target for developing green fungicides. Our findings also highlight the specific and important roles of species-unique genes in fungal pathogenesis and asexual development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof10080511/s1. Figure S1: Gene deletion of (A) MUG1, (B) MUG2, (C) MUG3, and (D) MUG4; Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.; investigation, H.Z., Z.C., Z.Y., L.T., W.G. and X.L.; writing—review and editing, H.Z. and J.Y.; supervision, J.Y.; funding acquisition, J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China Agricultural Research System (Grant No. CARS-01-43) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32272487). The funders had no roles in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sadat, A.; Jeon, J.; Mir, A.A.; Kim, S.; Choi, J.; Lee, Y.H. Analysis of in planta expressed orphan genes in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Pathol. J. 2014, 30, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, C.; Hei, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, M.; Zhu, G.; Huang, P.; et al. An orphan protein of Fusarium graminearum modulates host immunity by mediating proteasomal degradation of TaSnRK1α. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaessmann, H. Origins, evolution, and phenotypic impact of new genes. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1313–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Choi, J.; Lee, J.J.; Jeon, J. Genomic insights into the rice blast fungus through estimation of gene emergence time in phylogenetic context. Mycobiology 2018, 46, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Conant, G.C.; Wolfe, K.H. Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 938–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Domazet-Loso, T.; Tautz, D. An evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in Drosophila. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tautz, D.; Domazet-Lošo, T. The evolutionary origin of orphan genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Neme, R.; Tautz, D. Phylogenetic patterns of emergence of new genes support a model of frequent De Novo evolution. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Moyers, B.A.; Zhang, J. Evaluating phylostratigraphic evidence for widespread De Novo gene birth in genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khalturin, K.; Hemmrich, G.; Fraune, S.; Augustin, R.; Bosch, T.C. More than just orphans: Are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? Trends Genet. 2009, 25, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cai, J.; Zhao, R.; Jiang, H.; Wang, W. De novo origination of a new protein-coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008, 179, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ding, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Dong, Y.; Yu, H.; et al. A young Drosophila duplicate gene plays essential roles in spermatogenesis by regulating several Y-linked male fertility genes. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, C.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, C.; Zhang, P.W.; Lu, S.J.; Li, X.M.; Yu, Q.; Zheng, X.; et al. A human-specific de novo protein-coding gene associated with human brain functions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6, e1000734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martin, R.; Moran, G.P.; Jacobsen, I.D.; Heyken, A.; Domey, J.; Sullivan, D.J.; Kurzai, O.; Hube, B. The Candida albicans-specific gene EED1 encodes a key regulator of hyphal extension. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, X.; Pan, X.; Chen, D.; Yin, C.; Peng, J.; Shi, W.; Qi, L.; Wang, R.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Prp19-associated splicing factor Cwf15 regulates fungal virulence and development in the rice blast fungus. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 5901–5916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Di Pietro, A.; Talbot, N.J. Fungal pathogenesis: Combatting the oxidative burst. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, L.; Cai, X.; Xing, J.; Liu, C.; Hendy, A.; Chen, X.L. URM1-Mediated ubiquitin-like modification is required for oxidative stress adaptation during infection of the rice blast fungus. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eseola, A.B.; Ryder, L.S.; Osés-Ruiz, M.; Findlay, K.; Yan, X.; Cruz-Mireles, N.N.; Molinari, C.; Garduño-Rosales, M.; Talbot, N.J. Investigating the cell and developmental biology of plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2021, 154, 103562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gupta, L.; Vermani, M.; Kaur Ahluwalia, S.; Vijayaraghavan, P. Molecular virulence determinants of Magnaporthe oryzae: Disease pathogenesis and recent interventions for disease management in rice plant. Mycology 2021, 12, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shi, W.; Yang, J.; Chen, D.; Yin, C.; Zhang, H.; Xu, X.; Pan, X.; Wang, R.; Fei, L.; Li, M.; et al. The rice blast fungus SR protein 1 regulates alternative splicing with unique mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1011036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, L.; Ding, S.L.; Sharon, A.; Orbach, M.; Xu, J.R. Mirl is highly upregulated and localized to nuclei during infectious hyphal growth in the rice blast fungus. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2007, 20, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Peng, J.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Bhadauria, V.; Zhao, W.; Peng, Y.L. Transcriptional landscapes of long non-coding RNAs and alternative splicing in Pyricularia oryzae revealed by RNA-Seq. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 723636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, M.; Kiyosawa, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Hirano, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kushibuchi, K.; Watanabe, S. Proposal of a new method for differentiating races of Pyricularia oryzae in Japan. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 1976, 42, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, Y.L.; Shishiyama, J. Temporal sequence of cytological events in rice leaves infected with Pyricularia oryzae. Can. J. Bot. 1988, 66, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, X.W.; Zhao, R.; Xu, X.Z.; Tang, L.; Shi, W.; Chen, D.; Peng, J.B.; Bhadauria, V.; Zhao, W.S.; Yang, J.; et al. MoSnf5 regulates fungal virulence, growth, and conidiation in Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Fungi 2022, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, N.; Huang, M.; Liang, X.; Cao, M.; Lun, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Bhadauria, V.; Zhao, W.; Yan, J.; et al. Magnaporthe oryzae endoplasmic reticulum membrane complex regulates the biogenesis of membrane proteins for pathogenicity. New phytol. 2023, 238, 1163–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, J.; Zhao, X.; Sun, J.; Kang, Z.; Ding, S.; Xu, J.R.; Peng, Y.L. A novel protein Com1 is required for normal conidium morphology and full virulence in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xu, J.R.; Hamer, J.E. MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 2696–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, H.; Lu, X.; Li, M.; Lun, Z.; Yan, X.; Yin, C.; Yuan, G.; Wang, X.; Liu, N.; Liu, D.; et al. Plant immunity suppression by an exo-β-1,3-glucanase and an elongation factor 1α of the rice blast fungus. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, R.J.; Cui, D.R.; Zhao, R.; Jin, Y.J.; Zeng, W.H.; Yang, Y.; Qi, L.; Xiang, L.; Peng, Y.L. The regulatory subunit MoB56 of PP2A phosphatase regulates pathogenicity, growth and development in a protein complex with the atypical catalytic subunit Ppg1 in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.L.; Shi, T.; Yang, J.; Shi, W.; Gao, X.; Chen, D.; Xu, X.; Xu, J.R.; Talbot, N.J.; Peng, Y.L. N-glycosylation of effector proteins by an alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase is required for the rice blast fungus to evade host innate immunity. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1360–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, W.; Shi, W.; Xu, X.W.; Li, Z.G.; Yin, C.F.; Peng, J.B.; Pan, S.; Chen, X.L.; Zhao, W.S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Glutamate synthase MoGlt1-mediated glutamate homeostasis is important for autophagy, virulence and conidiation in the rice blast fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, D.; Lun, Z.; Liu, N.; Yuan, G.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Peng, Y.L.; Lu, X. Identification and characterization of novel candidate effector proteins from Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cao, N.; Zhu, X.M.; Bao, J.D.; Zhu, L.H.; Liu, H.; Lin, F.C.; Li, L. Acyl-coenzyme A binding protein MoAcb1 regulates conidiation and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1179536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thines, E.; Weber, R.W.; Talbot, N.J. MAP kinase and protein kinase A-dependent mobilization of triacylglycerol and glycogen during appressorium turgor generation by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1703–1718. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Foster, A.J.; Ryder, L.S.; Kershaw, M.J.; Talbot, N.J. The role of glycerol in the pathogenic lifestyle of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, X.; Yin, C.; Liu, X.; Peng, J.; Chen, D.; He, D.; Shi, W.; Zhao, W.; Yang, J.; Peng, Y. A glycine-rich protein MoGrp1 functions as a novel splicing factor to regulate fungal virulence and growth in Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathol. Res. 2019, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kong, L.A.; Yang, J.; Li, G.T.; Qi, L.L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, C.F.; Zhao, W.S.; Xu, J.R.; Peng, Y.L. Different chitin synthase genes are required for various developmental and plant infection processes in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Su, Y.; Jiang, X.; Wu, W.; Wang, M.; Hamid, M.I.; Xiang, M.; Liu, X. Genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analysis provide insights into the cold adaptation mechanism of the obligate psychrophilic fungus Mrakia psychrophila. G3 2016, 6, 3603–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, M.; Wang, F.; He, B.; Hu, J.; Dai, Y.; Chen, W.; Yi, M.; Zhang, H.; Ye, Y.; Cui, Z.; et al. Targeting Magnaporthe oryzae effector MoErs1 and host papain-like protease OsRD21 interaction to combat rice blast. Nat. Plants 2024, 10, 618–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X.; Mu, K.; Yang, S.; Wei, J.; Wang, C.; Yan, W.; Yuan, F.; Wang, H.; Han, D.; Kang, Z.; et al. Reduction of Rhizoctonia cerealis infection on wheat through host- and spray-induced gene silencing of an orphan secreted gene. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2022, 35, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 10 00511 g001
Figure 1. The four MUG genes were highly expressed at the early infection stage of Magnaporthe oryzae. Expression levels of the MUG1 (A), MUG2 (B), MUG3 (C), and MUG4 (D) were evaluated by qRT-PCR at different stages of fungal development, including vegetative hyphae (MY), conidia (CO), appressoria formed on hydrophobic film surfaces at 3 and 12 hpi (H3 and H12), and infected barley leaves at 18, 24, and 42 hpi (I18, I24, and I42), respectively. The expression levels of the four MUG genes were first normalized with the Actin gene in each tested tissue and the expression levels of MUG genes in MY were arbitrarily set to unity. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications.
Figure 1. The four MUG genes were highly expressed at the early infection stage of Magnaporthe oryzae. Expression levels of the MUG1 (A), MUG2 (B), MUG3 (C), and MUG4 (D) were evaluated by qRT-PCR at different stages of fungal development, including vegetative hyphae (MY), conidia (CO), appressoria formed on hydrophobic film surfaces at 3 and 12 hpi (H3 and H12), and infected barley leaves at 18, 24, and 42 hpi (I18, I24, and I42), respectively. The expression levels of the four MUG genes were first normalized with the Actin gene in each tested tissue and the expression levels of MUG genes in MY were arbitrarily set to unity. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications.
Jof 10 00511 g001
Jof 10 00511 g002
Figure 2. Mug1, Mug2, and Mug4, localized in the cytoplasm, and Mug3, localized in the nuclei. Subcellular localization of the Mug1–GFP (A), Mug2-GFP (B), Mug3-GFP (C), and Mug4-GFP (D) fusion proteins in conidia (Co), appressorium (Ap), invasive hyphae (IH), and vegetative hyphae (VH). Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 2. Mug1, Mug2, and Mug4, localized in the cytoplasm, and Mug3, localized in the nuclei. Subcellular localization of the Mug1–GFP (A), Mug2-GFP (B), Mug3-GFP (C), and Mug4-GFP (D) fusion proteins in conidia (Co), appressorium (Ap), invasive hyphae (IH), and vegetative hyphae (VH). Bar, 10 μm.
Jof 10 00511 g002
Jof 10 00511 g003
Figure 3. MUG1 was indispensable for full virulence. (A) Typical rice leaves of the susceptible cultivar ‘LTH’ sprayed with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 photographed at 5 dpi. (B) Statistics on disease lesion areas formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on susceptible rice cultivar ‘LTH’. Means and standard deviations were calculated from the lesions formed on the middle 5-cm of the fourth leaves. Three independent experiments were conducted with at least 10 leaves in each replicate. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (C) The leaves of susceptible barley cultivars were sprayed with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1. Photos were taken at 4 dpi. (D) Statistics on disease lesion areas formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 in (C). Three independent experiments were conducted with at least 10 leaves in each replicate. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (E) The leaves of rice seedlings at the four-leaf stage were abraded and inoculated with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1. Representative disease symptoms were photographed at 5 dpi. (F) Statistics on the length of individual disease lesions formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on abraded rice leaves as described in (E). Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments in which at least 10 leaves were inoculated for each of the strains.
Figure 3. MUG1 was indispensable for full virulence. (A) Typical rice leaves of the susceptible cultivar ‘LTH’ sprayed with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 photographed at 5 dpi. (B) Statistics on disease lesion areas formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on susceptible rice cultivar ‘LTH’. Means and standard deviations were calculated from the lesions formed on the middle 5-cm of the fourth leaves. Three independent experiments were conducted with at least 10 leaves in each replicate. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (C) The leaves of susceptible barley cultivars were sprayed with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1. Photos were taken at 4 dpi. (D) Statistics on disease lesion areas formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 in (C). Three independent experiments were conducted with at least 10 leaves in each replicate. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (E) The leaves of rice seedlings at the four-leaf stage were abraded and inoculated with conidia of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1. Representative disease symptoms were photographed at 5 dpi. (F) Statistics on the length of individual disease lesions formed by strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on abraded rice leaves as described in (E). Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments in which at least 10 leaves were inoculated for each of the strains.
Jof 10 00511 g003
Jof 10 00511 g004
Figure 4. MUG1 was required for appressorium turgor pressure and invasive hyphal growth. (A) Statistics on appressorium formation of wild-type strain P131, the MUG1 gene deletion mutants MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2, two gene complementation strains MUG1com1 and MUG1com2. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications. (B) Statistics on appressoria exhibiting incipient cytorrhysis of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2 with 1, 2, and 3 M glycerol. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (C) Classification of the infection process of fungal strains in the epidermal cells of barley leaves. AP, appressoria without primary invasive hyphae (IH) or penetration pegs; IH with 1 branch and IH with primary IH or penetration pegs; IH with 2 branches and IH with 2 branches; and IH ≥ 3 branches and IH with at least 3 branches. Scale bar, 10 μm. The black arrows point to the appressoria and the white arrows point to the IH. (D) Statistics on the percentages of the fungal infection process of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2 on barley leaves at 24 and 36 hpi. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments, each with at least 100 appressoria scored.
Figure 4. MUG1 was required for appressorium turgor pressure and invasive hyphal growth. (A) Statistics on appressorium formation of wild-type strain P131, the MUG1 gene deletion mutants MUG1ko1 and MUG1ko2, two gene complementation strains MUG1com1 and MUG1com2. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications. (B) Statistics on appressoria exhibiting incipient cytorrhysis of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2 with 1, 2, and 3 M glycerol. The means and standard deviations were calculated based on two independent experiments with three replications. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (C) Classification of the infection process of fungal strains in the epidermal cells of barley leaves. AP, appressoria without primary invasive hyphae (IH) or penetration pegs; IH with 1 branch and IH with primary IH or penetration pegs; IH with 2 branches and IH with 2 branches; and IH ≥ 3 branches and IH with at least 3 branches. Scale bar, 10 μm. The black arrows point to the appressoria and the white arrows point to the IH. (D) Statistics on the percentages of the fungal infection process of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2 on barley leaves at 24 and 36 hpi. Means and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments, each with at least 100 appressoria scored.
Jof 10 00511 g004
Jof 10 00511 g005
Figure 5. MUG1 was required for conidiation. (A) Colony of wild-type strain P131 and gene deletion mutants MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 cultured on oatmeal tomato agar (OTA) plates at 5 dpi. (B) Colony diameters of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 in (A). The means and standard deviations were calculated from three replicates. (C) Capacity for conidiation of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on an OTA plate. The means and standard deviations were calculated from three replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in conidiation between strains MUG1ko1 and P131 at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (D) Conidiation structure of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2. Co, conidium. Cp, conidiophore. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 5. MUG1 was required for conidiation. (A) Colony of wild-type strain P131 and gene deletion mutants MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 cultured on oatmeal tomato agar (OTA) plates at 5 dpi. (B) Colony diameters of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 in (A). The means and standard deviations were calculated from three replicates. (C) Capacity for conidiation of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG2ko1, MUG3ko1, and MUG4ko1 on an OTA plate. The means and standard deviations were calculated from three replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in conidiation between strains MUG1ko1 and P131 at p < 0.01 according to a t-test. (D) Conidiation structure of strains P131, MUG1ko1, MUG1ko2, MUG1com1, and MUG1com2. Co, conidium. Cp, conidiophore. Bar, 20 μm.
Jof 10 00511 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Yu, Z.; Tang, L.; Gao, W.; Lu, X.; Yang, J. Magnaporthe-Unique Gene MUG1 Is Important for Fungal Appressorial Penetration, Invasive Hyphal Extension, and Virulence in Rice Blast Fungi. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080511

AMA Style

Zhang H, Chen Z, Yu Z, Tang L, Gao W, Lu X, Yang J. Magnaporthe-Unique Gene MUG1 Is Important for Fungal Appressorial Penetration, Invasive Hyphal Extension, and Virulence in Rice Blast Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(8):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Huixia, Zhiyi Chen, Zechen Yu, Liu Tang, Wenqiang Gao, Xunli Lu, and Jun Yang. 2024. "Magnaporthe-Unique Gene MUG1 Is Important for Fungal Appressorial Penetration, Invasive Hyphal Extension, and Virulence in Rice Blast Fungi" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 8: 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop