Next Article in Journal
Population Structure of Phytophthora infestans in Israel Changes Frequently Due to the Import of Asymptomatic Late Blight-Infected Potato Seed Tubers from Europe
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Secondary Metabolites by UHPLC-ESI-HRMS/MS in Antifungal Strain Trichoderma harzianum (LBAT-53)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of PCR-Multiplex Assays for Identification of the Herpotrichiellaceae Family and Agents Causing Chromoblastomycosis

J. Fungi 2024, 10(8), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080548
by Gabriel S. M. Sousa 1,2,*, Rodrigo S. De Oliveira 2, Alex B. Souza 2, Ruan C. Monteiro 3, Elaine P. T. E. Santo 2, Luciano C. Franco Filho 2, Denison L. O. Moraes 1,2, Sarah R. De Sá 2 and Silvia H. M. Da Silva 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
J. Fungi 2024, 10(8), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080548
Submission received: 15 March 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 2 August 2024 / Published: 4 August 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study developed two PCR-Multiplex methodologies to identify the Herpotrichiellaceae family and the bantiana clade, and determine the species Fonsecaea pedrosoi and Fonsecaea monophora. The assays developed in this study is a complement sequencing. There are still some questions to make it more clear:

1. The author didn't select the genus level Nucleotide sequences, why only made the limited primer pairs identification for family level, clade level and two specific species levels?

2. What is the principle to determine the identify profile? Why didn't include the Cladophialophora species?

3. Did the authors finish the Nonspecific Amplification inter-species of the family? It is not clear shown in the strains list.

1. Is there more comparison for the primer pairs evaluation for the Herpotrichiellaceae family and the bantiana clade?

Author Response

Caro revisor,

Por favor, verifique o anexo.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

first, there are  PCR + sequencing with marker ITS 1-4 or ssu to identify those family to species level,  what is the aim to do this research?

second: bantiana clade: what do you mean?

why detect those at family level? clade level? 

introduction and discussion sections deviated to other direction but methodology.

 

 

fig.1: bantiana clade you marked is wrong.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 I do not have major comments for this paper.

1- I would have been improtant to add a greater number of strains for microorganisms with very few strains. I am not sure if the authors could request more strains from the other researchers.

2. It is true that the phenothypic identification of these microorganisms is difficult and subjetive and that molecular biology  procedures can help in precise identification. However, the feasibility of having enough equipment in developing countries is low. Please, justify the imminent use of this equipment for an identification that is related to a specific treatment according the etiological agent.

Author Response

Caro revisor,

Por favor, verifique o anexo.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop