Next Article in Journal
Control of Peach Brown Rot Disease Produced by Monilinia fructicola and Monilinia laxa Using Benzylidene-Cycloalkanones
Previous Article in Journal
A New Overview of Sex Bias in Fungal Infections
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metals Transfer in Mushroom Tricholoma matsutake from Regional High Geochemical Background Areas: Environmental Influences and Human Health Risk

1
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Wetland Conservation, Restoration and Ecological Services, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2
Institute of Tropical and Subtropical Cash Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baoshan 678000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(9), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090608
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024

Abstract

:
Wild-grown edible mushrooms are important in world diets and are also efficient metal accumulators. Yunnan, Southwest China, is the main producing region, with typically high levels of geochemical metals. The environmental factors, bioaccumulation, distribution and human health risks of metals were examined in paired soil and Tricholoma matsutake (n = 54). T. matsutake grows on acidified soils (pH = 3.95–6.56), and metals show a strong heterogeneity, with Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in the ranges of 16–201, 0.046–8.58 g kg−1, and 22.6–215, 3.7–155 mg kg−1. High soil Fe content led to great accumulation in T. matsutake (0.24–18.8 g kg1). However, though the soil Mn content was higher than that of Zn and Cu, their concentrations in T. matsutake were comparable (21.1–487 vs. 38.7–329 and 24.9–217 mg kg1). This suggested that T. matsutake prefers to accumulate Zn and Cu compared to Mn, and this is supported by the bioaccumulation factors (BAFs = 0.32–17.1 vs. 0.006–1.69). Fe was mainly stored in stipes, while Mn, Zn and Cu were stored in caps, and the translocation factors (TFs) were 0.58 vs. 1.28–1.94. Therefore, stipe Fe showed the highest health risk index (HRI) at 1.28–26.9, followed by cap Cu (1.01–2.33), while 98–100% of the Mn and Zn were risk-free. The higher concentration and greater risk of Fe was attributed to the significant effect of soil Fe content (R = 0.34) and soil pH (R = −0.57). This study suggested that Fe, as an essential mineral, may exert toxic effects via the consumption of T. matsutake from high geochemical background areas.

1. Introduction

Generally, mushrooms are potential sources of bioactive compounds like vitamin B2, minerals and antioxidants (ergothioneine and glutathione), which have pro-health properties, including anticancer, antidiabetic and immunomodulating activities. Typically, wild edible mushrooms play an important role in world diets, with consumption steadily increasing due to their texture, flavor and nutritional and medicinal value, especially in Europe and Asia [1,2]. Specifically, 73.5% of mushroom consumers in the Czech Republic have a local consumption of up to 1.0 kg per capita and 5.6 kg per household annually [3,4]. Yunnan Province, located in Southwest China, is rich in wild edible mushrooms and is the major distribution and production region [5]. It accounts for 91% of the known abundance of wild edible mushrooms in China and 43% of the world abundance [6]. Tricholoma matsutake is the most valuable, frequently consumed and economically important species [7,8], whose terpenoid and polysaccharide extracts show antitumor and antioxidant values [9,10]. Additionally, the export rate of T. matsutake from Yunnan accounts for 80% of the total exports in China [11].
In addition to the abundance of mushrooms, Yunnan is characterized by diverse polymetallic bedrocks and high geochemical background concentrations of metals. Furthermore, Yunnan has abundant mineral resources and is known as “the kingdom of nonferrous metals”. The high concentrations of background metals together with the intensive mining activities lead to soils being heavily polluted and thereby to potential transfer via the food chain, thus causing risk to humans. Moreover, wild mushrooms are efficient metal accumulators, showing greater metal accumulations than common agricultural crop plants and vegetables [6]. Typically, T. matsutake can accumulate toxic metal(loid)s like cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in quantities of up to 2.88, 7.12 and 8.63 mg kg1 [6,12]. Indeed, hazardous metals and nutritional components (proteins, vitamins and antioxidants) in T. matsutake have been studied in depth [11]. However, there are limited studies on the mineral metal accumulation and potential health risks of T. matsutake from areas with elevated geogenic metals.
Metals (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) are essential mineral components for human health [1], which, however, exert toxic effects when exceeding the amounts required for physiological functions [13]. Wild mushroom consumption is an important dietary source of mineral metals, which may pose a risk to human health. Generally, metal transfer and accumulation in mushrooms depend on the total concentration and soil physicochemical properties. Among soil properties, pH and organic matter (OM) are predominant in affecting metal bioavailability and thereby accumulation in mushrooms [14]. However, studies have mainly focused on the mineral concentration [15,16,17], composition and nutritional values, and limited information is available about the process of transfer, distribution, potential health risks and underlying influencing factors.
Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) analyze the metals (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) concentrations and distributions (in caps and stipes) in paired soils and T. matsutake (n = 54) from Yunnan Province, China; (2) evaluate metal soil-to-fruiting body accumulation and stipe-to-cap transfer efficiency, and clarify the correlation between soil metal concentration, pH and OM with respect to T. matsutake; and (3) assess the edible safety by calculating the metal daily intake (DI) via T. matsutake ingestion and the associated health risk index (HRI). This study helps us to better understand the uptake, transfer, accumulation, potential health risks and influencing factors of mineral metals in wild mushrooms and provides hazard-level indications and requirements for exposure control awareness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Pretreatment

Paired soil (0–10 cm) and T. matsutake (n = 54) samples were collected from two geographic villages in Diqing State, Yunnan Province, China, during mushroom harvest season, including Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14) (Figure 1). Each soil or T. matsutake sample was made up of five well-mixed subsamples. Soils were air-dried, ground, well mixed and passed through a 100-mesh (0.15 mm) nylon sieve. Fresh T. matsutake fruiting bodies were rinsed with deionized (DI) water to remove surface-adsorbed soil and elements, then separated into caps and stipes and lyophilized at −80 °C to constant weights (FreezZone 12, LabConco, Kansas City, MO, USA). Freeze-dried mushrooms were ground under liquid nitrogen to obtain homogeneous powders and stored at −20 °C before further analyses.

2.2. Chemical Analysis

The soil pH was determined by mixing soil with 0.01 M CaCl2 solution at 1:5 (m/v), shaking at 180 rpm and 25 °C for 1 h, then analyzing the supernatant with a pH meter (Mettler–Toldo, Columbus, OH, USA) [18]. The soil organic matter (OM) content was determined gravimetrically after combustion at 550 °C for 16 h in a furnace horn (Select–Horn, SELECTA, Cham, Switzerland) [19].
Metal concentrations in soils and T. matsutake were analyzed with X-ray fluorescence (XRF, E-max500, Z–spec, Inc., East Greenbush, NY, USA) under normal detection mode. The radio frequency power was 1050 W and the measuring time was 600 s [20]. Standard reference materials including the mushroom Lentinus edodes (GBW10197) and soil (GSS1) were used for concentration assays for quality assurance and quality control. The Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations obtained via XRF for GBW10197 were 141 ± 0.61, 26.2 ± 0.16, 53 ± 0.17 and 6.23 ± 0.05 mg kg−1 (mean ± SD, n = 3), which were in good agreement with the certified values at 152 ± 21, 25 ± 0.8, 51 ± 3.8 and 5.73 ± 0.18 mg kg−1. The Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations obtained via XRF for GSS1 were 1644 ± 5.86, 630 ± 0.7 and 20.9 ± 0.46 mg kg−1, which were in good agreement with the certified values at 1760 ± 63, 680 ± 25 and 21 ± 2 mg kg−1. The average recoveries were 92.6–109%. All analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.3. Bioaccumulation and Translocation Analysis

To evaluate the metals accumulation from soil to the T. matsutake cap and stipe, the bioaccumulation factor (BAF) was calculated via Equation (1) [21]:
B A F = C m u s h r o o m C s o i l
where Cmushroom is the concentration of the individual metal in the T. matsutake cap or stipe (mg kg−1) and Csoil is the corresponding metal concentration in the soil (mg kg−1). BAF > 1 indicates that the organism is an accumulator towards the given element.
To estimate the metals transfer and distribution from the T. matsutake stipe to cap, the translocation factor (TF) was calculated via Equation (2) [22]:
T F = C c C s
where CC is the concentration of the individual metal in the cap and CS is the concentration in the stipe.

2.4. Health Risk Analysis

To assess the potential health risk of human exposure to metals-contaminated T. matsutake, the health risk index (HRI) was analyzed via Equation (3) [23]:
H R I = D I R f D i
where DI is the daily intake of metal per kg of human body weight (bw) via T. matsutake consumption (µg kg−1 bw d−1; Equation (4)). RfDi is the reference dose of oral intake of the metal (i) (µg kg−1 bw d−1) proposed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECEFA) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [24,25]. The RfD values established for Fe (JECEFA), Mn, Zn and Cu (USEPA) were 300, 140, 300 and 40 µg kg−1 bw d−1 (Table 1) [26].
The daily intake (DI; µg kg−1 bw d−1) of metals was calculated via Equation (4) [6]:
D I = S M × M C M B W
where SM is a daily serving amount (0.03 kg dried T. matsutake), MCM is the metal concentration in the mushrooms (mg kg−1 dw) and BW is the average human body weight (70 kg for adults) [27]. The provisional tolerable maximum daily intake (PTMDI) values for Cu and Zn were 300–1000 and 5000 µg kg1 bw d1 (JECEFA) (Table 1).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results are presented as the mean of triplicate analyses and standard deviation. Statistical differences and variance was evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05 (SPSS 20.0, SPSS Corporation, New York, NY, USA). Pearson correlation analysis was established by SPSS 25.0 at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01. The figures were drawn using Origin 2022 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soil pH, OM and Metals Concentration

Among soil characteristics, the pH, OM content and metal total concentration are critical in mediating metal uptake and accumulation in mushrooms [28]. The soil pH values were 3.95–6.56, indicating that T. matsutake prefers to grow in an acidic environment (Table 1). Normally, Southwest China is prevalent with karst soils with pH values at 6.07–8.53 [29]. Given that mushrooms usually grow in the forest, the acidic to weak acidic soils may be attributed to litter decomposition, which produces organic acids to contribute protons [30]. Soil acidification renders metals mobilized and released into the soil solution, which are readily taken up by mushrooms [31]. This was in consistent with the finding that forest soils growing wild mushrooms are acidic in Poland, with pH values low at 3.35 in pine understory soils [32].
Soil OM is the organic fraction originated from plant and animal decomposition and microbial activities [33]. OM is a strong metal sorbent in organic forest soils for the rich carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, which can complex with metal cations and affect their mobility and bioavailability [34,35]. In this study, soil OM showed strong heterogeneity ranging from 1.29% to 44.5% (Table 1), which was higher than the reported values in agricultural soils of Yunnan (1.67–9.78%) and South Africa (1.5–13.7%) [31]. Generally, metal bioavailability decreases with increasing OM due to the strong adsorption, complexation and chelation [36,37]. However, evidence suggests that metal bioavailability can be increased with increasing OM, attributed to the fact that OM chelates metal to form soluble organo-metal complexes [38]. This was supported by the finding that soil Cu and Zn bioavailability was significantly (p < 0.05) positively correlated with OM content (R = 0.73 and R = 0.86) [39].
The metals concentrations in T. matsutake growing soils showed a strong heterogeneity, with Fe and Mn (16–201 and 0.046–8.58 g kg−1) being much higher than Zn and Cu (22.6–215 and 3.7–155 mg kg−1) (Figure 2). The soil metal concentrations in this study were higher than soils growing wild mushrooms (Macrolepiota procera, Imleria badia, Leccinum scabrum and Boletus edulis): Fe (0.12–5.36 g kg−1), Mn (0.014–0.12 g kg−1), Zn (3.75–31 mg kg−1) and Cu (0.24–21 mg kg−1) [32]. This may be due to the intensive activities of energy and raw material industries like coal, electricity, petrochemical and nonferrous metals in Yunnan Province [40]. In forested areas, soil metals often originate from parent material and atmospheric deposition (busy roads and emitters). The high concentration of metals in soils may be transferred to T. matsutake, so the metals concentrations and bioaccumulation in T. matsutake were examined.

3.2. Metals Concentration and Distribution in T. matsutake

3.2.1. High Metals Concentration in T. matsutake

Given the high concentration of Fe in soils, the Fe concentration in T. matsutake was the highest among the four metals (0.24–18.8 g kg−1 vs. 21.1–487 mg kg−1) especially in Luoji village (Figure 2B). However, despite the much higher concentration of Mn than Zn and Cu in soils (0.046–8.58 g kg−1 vs. 22.6–215 and 3.7–155 mg kg−1) (Figure 2A), their concentrations in T. matsutake were comparable (21.1–487 vs. 38.7–329 and 24.9–217 mg kg−1) (Figure 3). This indicated that T. matsutake prefers to accumulate Zn and Cu compared to Mn.
Generally, Fe is an essential mineral element for mushrooms [13]. The Fe concentration in T. matsutake (0.24–18.8 g kg−1; Figure 3) was higher than that in T. matsutake collected from Sichuan Province, China (0.01–0.08 g kg−1) [41]. In addition, it was much higher than a wide range of wild mushroom species (Lactarius deliciosus, Clitocybe houghtonii, T. argyraceum and B. chrysenteron) at 0.16–0.43 g kg−1 [42] and a large sample size (Amanita rubescens, Suillus granulatus, Bovista plumbea and Lycoperdon perlatum) at 0.02–0.17 g kg−1 (n = 102) from unpolluted areas with a soil Fe concentration at 14.4–27 g kg−1 [43]. This suggested that soil Fe is an important source for its accumulation in wild mushrooms. This was supported by the finding in Jilin Province, China, showing that the high As concentration in T. matsutake from Changbai Mountain was due to the high As content in black soils [44]. Still, compared within Yunnan Province, the T. matsutake Fe concentration in the present studied areas Luoji (0.57–18.8 g kg−1) and Jiantang (0.24–11.7 g kg−1) was higher than that from Lijiang, Nanhua, Zhongshan and Deqin (0.046–0.42 g kg−1) with lower soil Fe contents at 0.29–3.07 g kg−1 [6].
Though the soil Mn concentration was orders of magnitude higher than Zn and Cu, their concentrations in T. matsutake were comparable. Specifically, the Mn concentration in T. matsutake was 21.1–487 mg kg−1 (Figure 3), which was higher than that in T. matsutake (1.54–29.4 mg kg−1) from Lijiang, Nanhua, Zhongshan and Deqin, Yunnan Province [6], and other species including Coprinus comatus, Voluariella volvacea and Pleurotus nebrodensis at 13.5–113 mg kg−1 [5]. Similarly, the Zn concentration in the present study (38.7–329 mg kg−1) was higher than that in T. matsutake (8.71–46.9 mg kg−1) [6] and M. procera (22–240 mg kg−1) [45] but was comparable with that in Agaricus bisporus, B. edulis and T. columbetta (30–310 mg kg−1) [46].
Similarly to Mn and Zn, the Cu concentration (24.9–217 mg kg−1) was much higher than the reported values in T. matsutake from four regions in Yunnan Province at 1.53–12.6 mg kg−1, which may be attributed to the different concentrations in soils at 3.7–155 (Figure 2) vs. 26.5–51.9 mg kg−1 [6]. In addition, it was higher than the Cu concentrations (7.3–123 mg kg−1) in 20 wild mushroom species grown in the “green lung region” of Poland without urbanization or industry [47]. However, it was also higher than in wild mushrooms (L. scabrum, B. reticulatus and L. griseum) (17.1–162 mg kg−1) collected in a highly contaminated area in Eastern Slovakia [48].
As such, the data indicated that the metals concentration in the studied T. matsutake was much higher than other mushroom species from other regions and the same species in the same province. Therefore, the underlying influencing factors and potential health risks to humans should be studied.

3.2.2. Metals Distribution in Cap and Stipe

Fe was mainly stored in the stipe (69.1%), while Mn, Zn and Cu were transferred to the cap (54.1%, 65.3% and 64.1%) (Figure 3), indicating that T. matsutake was more efficient in transferring Mn, Zn and Cu than Fe. Specifically, the Fe contents in the cap and stipe were 0.24–4.9 and 0.41–18.8 g kg−1, with the average value at 2.2 and 6.02 g kg−1. A greater Fe content in the stipe (0.26 g kg−1) than in the cap (0.08 g kg−1) was also found in M. procera (n = 15) [45].
In contrast, the Mn, Zn and Cu content in the cap (21.1–487, 82.8–329 and 40.5–218 mg kg−1) was much higher than in the stipe (28.7–239, 38.7–130 and 24.9–92.1 mg kg−1). A similar result was found in Amanita muscaria, showing a greater Zn content in the cap (150–250 mg kg−1) than in the stipe (110–240 mg kg−1) [49]. Similarly, a greater cap than stipe content of Cu was found in wild mushrooms (B. edulis, B. reticulatus, L. scabrum and L. griseum) at 35.2–162 vs. 17.1–72.4 mg kg−1 [48]. This suggested that a greater stipe-to-cap transfer of Zn and Cu may be common in wild mushrooms including T. matsutake.

3.3. Metals Bioaccumulation and Transfer in T. matsutake

Though T. matsutake accumulated high concentrations of Fe (Figure 3), the bioaccumulation factor (BAF = 0.005–0.1) suggested that it is not a hyperaccumulator (BAF < 1) towards Fe (Figure 4A,B). Similarly, T. matsutake was also not a Mn hyperaccumulator with 91.7% of samples showing BAF < 1. Instead, T. matsutake can hyperaccumulate Zn and Cu, with 63% and 77.8% of samples showing BAF > 1 and reaching 4.59 and 17.1. The ability of wild mushrooms to accumulate metallic elements is related to the network of hyphae located in the upper soil horizon [50,51]. Hyphae consisting of elongated tubular cells enveloped by a chitin wall are widely spread over the bioavailable areas to accumulate metal ions [52]. In addition, this process is influenced by environmental factors (soil metal concentration, pH and OM) and intrinsic properties (size and mycelial age) [53].
Consistent with the metals distribution (Figure 3), the average stipe-to-cap translocation factors (TFs) of Zn and Cu were higher than those of Fe and Mn (1.94 and 1.89 vs. 0.58 and 1.28) (Figure 4C). Specifically, the percentage of TF > 1 was 100% and 98% for Zn and Cu, while that for Fe and Mn was 7.4% and 63%. The greater translocation of Zn and Cu was consistent with but higher than the reported values in M. procera (TF = 1.22–2.07 and 0.55–1.76) [54]. This may be due to the different nature and concentration of proteins between the cap and the stipe, which was evidenced by the various carpophore structures showing a more complex electrophoretic spectrum in the cap than the stipe [54,55].

3.4. Potential Risk to Human Health

Mineral metals are essential components for human health, which, however, exert toxic effects when exceeding the amount required for physiological functions [1]. To evaluate the potential health risk associated with T. matsutake consumption, the daily intake (DI) of metals and the health risk index (HRI) were analyzed.

3.4.1. Metals Daily Intake Estimate

The daily intake (DI) of metal was calculated and compared with certificated values proposed by JECEFA and USEPA. The reference dose (RfD) values established for Fe (JECEFA), Mn, Zn and Cu (USEPA) were 300, 140, 300 and 40 µg kg−1 bw d1 (Table 1). The provisional tolerable maximum daily intake (PTMDI) values for Zn and Cu were 300–1000 and 5000 µg kg−1 bw d1 (JECEFA).
Among the four metals, Fe showed the highest DI values (102–8058 µg kg−1 bw d−1), especially for the Luoji region at 244–8058 µg kg−1 bw d−1 (Table 1). Typically, 93.5% of DI values for Fe in T. matsutake exceeded the RfD limit (300 µg kg1 bw d1). In contrast, the DI values for Mn (99.1%) and Zn (100%) were generally within the RfD limits. In terms of Cu, 30.6% of DI values exceeded the RfD limit established by USEPA (40 µg kg1 bw d1), but all were within the PTMDI limit established by JECEFA (5000 µg kg1 bw d1). This suggested that the daily intake of Fe via T. matsutake consumption may cause a risk to human health.
The DI values in the present study were generally higher than the reported values in the wild mushrooms Amanitaceae, Lactarius and Russulaceae but lower than for Agaricaceae from different regions including Spain and Morocco [56,57]. For example, the average DI value for Mn in this study was 5-fold that of 13 wild mushroom species from Belgrad forest at 41.2 vs. 8.16 µg kg1 bw d1 [58]. The difference can be attributed to regional soil geochemical characteristics and the physiology and genetic characteristics of individual mushroom species [1].
Further, thermal cooking processes were reported to increase the metals concentration in mushrooms. For example, frying increased the Fe and Mn content in A. bisporus (n = 540) from 66.2 to 69.5 and from 5.77 to 7.0 mg kg−1 dw. Boiling and frying increased the Zn and Cu content from 126 to 153–156 and from 56.4 to 59.4–60 mg kg−1 dw [59]. This suggested that high-temperature processing may increase the risk of metals via wild mushroom ingestion, so the detailed effects and toxic mechanisms deserve further investigation for risk control during food preparation.

3.4.2. Health Risk Assessment

A health risk index (HRI) > 1 for a given metal indicates there is potential risk to human health [6,60]. Consistent with the high concentration and high DI value in T. matsutake, Fe showed the highest risk with 93.5% of HRI > 1 (Figure 5). Especially since Fe was mainly stored in the stipe (Figure 3), stipe Fe showed a greater risk than in the cap with HRI values of 0.59–26.9 vs. 0.34–7.0 (Figure 5). The Fe HRI value in this study was lower than that in wild mushrooms (Amanita mellea, Hygrophorus pudorinus, Polyporus squamosus and Russula vinosa) from Turkey, Spain, and Morocco at 21.4–97 [60]. HRI values suggested that Fe in wild mushrooms from specific geographical locations may exert a health risk to humans.
Compared to Fe, Mn (99.1%) and Zn (100%) in T. matsutake showed no potential health risk (Figure 5). Cu is an essential element occurring in enzymes that is important in the immune and nervous systems [61]. Nonetheless, it may still pose a risk to human health at elevated levels of exposure. The result indicated that 61.1% of Cu in the cap showed a risk with an HRI value at 1.01–2.33. The higher risk of Cu than Zn was consistent with M. procera from Southern Spain and Northern Morocco, showing that the HRI of Cu was >1, while that of Zn was <1 [54]. As such, Fe in T. matsutake showed the greatest risk, followed by the cap Cu, while Mn and Zn were considered risk-free.

3.5. Correlation between Soil Properties and T. matsutake Metals Accumulation

The metals bioavailability in soils and accumulation in T. matsutake depend on the metal total concentration, soil pH and OM; therefore, the correlations between soil and T. matsutake were analyzed (Figure 6).
The result showed that the soil metals total concentration and pH showed significant effects on metals accumulation in T. matsutake, especially on the cap Fe and stipe Cu. Specifically, the cap Fe was significantly positively affected by the soil Fe content (R = 0.34, p < 0.05), while it was negatively affected by the soil pH (R = −0.57, p < 0.01). Similar to the cap Fe, the stipe Cu was significantly positively correlated with the soil Cu content (R = 0.29, p < 0.05), while it was negatively correlated with the soil pH (R = −0.44, p < 0.01). In addition, the soil Cu content showed a greater effect on its accumulation in the stipe than in the cap (R = 0.29 vs. −0.15). This was consistent with Su et al., finding that the correlation of the soil Cu concentration with that in B. edulis stipe and cap was R = 0.65 and −0.13 [62]. This again suggested that soil is an important source for Fe and Cu accumulation in the T. matsutake cap and stipe, respectively, and acidic soils (pH = 3.95–6.56; Table 1) further increase their mobility and accumulation [62].
Contrary to Fe and Cu, both the cap (R = 0.38, p < 0.01) and stipe Mn (R = 0.33, p < 0.05) were significantly positively correlated with soil pH. Therefore, acidic conditions may decrease Mn accumulation in T. matsutake. This was supported by the very high Mn content in soils (0.046–8.58 g kg−1; Figure 2A) while low accumulation in T. matsutake (21.1–487 mg kg1; Figure 3). In addition, the cap and stipe Mn were positively correlated with the soil Mn content (R = 0.22 and 0.15), which were weaker than that in B. badius (R = 0.34 and 0.43) [63]. In terms of Zn, the cap was positively correlated with the soil Zn concentration (R = 0.09) and pH (R = 0.09), while the stipe showed a significant negative correlation with the soil pH (R = −0.31, p < 0.05). This indicated that the soil Mn and Zn concentrations exert relatively low effects on their accumulation in T. matsutake.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated four metals (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) concentrations, translocation and accumulation from soil to T. matsutake and evaluated the potential health risk of the metals via T. matsutake ingestion. The results showed that the metals concentrations in T. matsutake growing soils were strongly heterogenous. The Fe and Mn (16–201 and 0.046–8.58 g kg−1) concentrations were much higher than those of Zn and Cu (22.6–215 and 3.7–155 mg kg−1). The highest Fe concentration in the T. matsutake cap (0.24–18.8 g kg−1) and the significant positive correlation with the soil Fe content (R = 0.34, p < 0.05) suggested that soil Fe is an important source for its accumulation in T. matsutake. In contrast to Fe, the high concentration of Mn in soils does not necessarily lead to high accumulation in T. matsutake, with the BAF at 0.006–1.69. In addition, T. matsutake showed accumulation and transfer ability towards Zn and Cu, where BAF and TF were 0.32–17.1 and 0.96–4.53. Correspondingly, Fe showed the highest health risk with 92.6–94.4% of samples showing an HRI > 1. In addition to the soil Fe concentration, the high Fe accumulation in T. matsutake and the high potential risk were related to the low soil pH (3.95–6.56), which were significantly negatively correlated (R = −0.57, p < 0.01).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, C.W. and Y.Z. (Yukang Zhang); software, J.B.; validation, C.W. and Y.Z. (Yixuan Zhang); formal analysis, C.W. and Y.Z. (Yukang Zhang); investigation, C.W. and Y.Z. (Yixuan Zhang); resources, J.B.; data curation, C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.W.; writing—review and editing, J.B. and X.L.; funding acquisition, C.W. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Yunnan Agricultural Joint Research Foundation (202301BD070001-154, 202101BD070001-043), Yunnan Xingdian Talent Project (YNQR-QNRC-2019-027), the Scientific Research Foundation of Yunnan Education Department (2024Y599) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41867066, 41907129).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brzezicha-Cirocka, J.; Grembecka, M.; Grochowska, I.; Falandysz, J.; Szefer, P. Elemental composition of selected species of mushrooms based on a chemometric evaluation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wagner, D.; Heider, D.; Hattab, G. Mushroom data creation, curation, and simulation to support classification tasks. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8134–8145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kalač, P. Trace element contents in European species of wild growing edible mushrooms: A review for the period 2000–2009. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Research progress on elements of wild edible mushrooms. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 964–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, F.; Qu, L.; Fan, W.; Qiao, M.; Hao, H.; Wang, X. Assessment of heavy metals in some wild edible mushrooms collected from Yunnan Province, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 179, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, B.R.; Huang, Q.; Cai, H.J.; Guo, X.; Wang, T.T.; Gui, M.Y. Study of heavy metal concentrations in wild edible mushrooms in Yunnan Province, China. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, H.; Gao, B.; Gu, W. Prediction of the potential geographic distribution of the ectomycorrhizal mushroom Tricholoma matsutake under multiple climate change scenarios. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46221–46231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xu, J.; Cadorin, M.; Liang, Y.J.; Yang, Z.L. DNA-based geographic typing of the gourmet mushroom Tricholoma matsutake traded in China. Mycoscience 2010, 51, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Q.; Li, X.L.; Chen, C.; Li, S.H.; Huang, W.L.; Xiong, C.; Jin, X.; Zheng, L.Y. Analysis of bacterial diversity and communities associated with Tricholoma matsutake fruiting bodies by barcoded pyrosequencing in Sichuan Province, Southwest China. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.H.; Li, X.L.; Huang, W.L.; Yang, H.; Zheng, L.Y. Chemical compositions and volatile compounds of Tricholoma matsutake from different geographical areas at different stages of maturity. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.H.; Zhao, Y.L.; Li, T.; Li, J.Q.; Wang, Y.Z.; Liu, H.G. A mini-review of chemical composition and nutritional value of edible wild-grown mushroom from China. Food Chem. 2014, 151, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Falandysz, J.; Borovička, J. Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms: Health benefits and risks. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 477–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gharibzahedi, S.M.T.; Jafari, S.M. The importance of minerals in human nutrition: Bioavailability, food fortification, processing effects and nanoencapsulation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Liang, C.; Huang, H.; Wang, S. Available heavy metals concentrations in agricultural soils: Relationship with soil properties and total heavy metals concentrations in different industries. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 471, 134410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, H. Trace element content of Boletus tomentipes mushroom collected from Yunnan, China. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1828–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarikurkcu, C.; Tepe, B.; Kocak, M.S.; Uren, M.C. Metal concentration and antioxidant activity of edible mushrooms from Turkey. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Szymańska, K.; Strumińska-Parulska, D.; Falandysz, J. Uranium (234U, 238U) and thorium (230Th, 232Th) in mushrooms of genus Leccinum and Leccinellum and the potential effective ionizing radiation dose assessment for human. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. George, T.S.; Richardson, A.E.; Simpson, R.J. Behaviour of plant-derived extracellular phytase upon addition to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Melgar, M.J.; Alonso, J.; Garcia, M.A. Mercury in edible mushrooms and underlying soil: Bioconcentration factors and toxicological risk. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 5328–5334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ju, Y.; Luo, Z.; Bi, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, X. Transfer of heavy metals from soil to tea and the potential human health risk in a regional high geochemical background area in southwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168122–168134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Hedding, D.W.; Nel, W.; Ji, J.; Chen, J. Geochemical behavior and potential health risk of heavy metals in basalt-derived agricultural soil and crops: A case study from Xuyi County, eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 729, 139058–139067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dimitrijevic, M.; Mitic, V.; Dordevic, D.; Popovic, G.; Krstic, N.; Nikolic, J.; Jovanovic, V.S. Macroelements versus toxic elements in selected wild edible mushrooms of the Russulacea family from Serbia. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2021, 86, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cui, Y.J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhai, R.H.; Chen, D.Y.; Huang, Y.Z.; Qiu, Y.; Liang, J.Z. Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables in an area near a smelter in Nanning, China. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). 2021. Available online: https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database (accessed on 11 August 2024).
  25. USEPA. A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RAF: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/iris (accessed on 11 August 2024).
  26. Zhang, R.; Tao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Chang, Q. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils and identification of main influencing factors in a typical industrial park in northwest China. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126591–126600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kalač, P.; Svoboda, L. A review of trace element concentrations in edible mushrooms. Food Chem. 2000, 69, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. García, M.Á.; Alonso, J.; Melgar, M.J. Lead in edible mushrooms: Levels and bioaccumulation factors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qi, D.; Wieneke, X.; Tao, J.; Zhou, X.; Desilva, U. Soil pH is the primary factor correlating with soil microbiome in karst rocky desertification regions in the Wushan County, Chongqing, China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1027–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tanikawa, T.; Fujii, S.; Sun, L.; Hirano, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Miyatani, K.; Doi, R.; Mizoguchi, T.; Maie, N. Leachate from fine root litter is more acidic than leaf litter leachate: A 2.5-year laboratory incubation. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rasalanavho, M.; Moodley, R.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Elemental bioaccumulation and nutritional value of five species of wild growing mushrooms from South Africa. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126596–126606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mleczek, M.; Siwulski, M.; Budka, A.; Mleczek, P.; Budzynska, S.; Szostek, M.; Kuczynska-Kippen, N.; Kalac, P.; Niedzielski, P.; Gasecka, M.; et al. Toxicological risks and nutritional value of wild edible mushroom species -a half-century monitoring study. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128095–128106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Galicia-Andres, E.; Escalona, Y.; Oostenbrink, C.; Tunega, D.; Gerzabek, M.H. Soil organic matter stabilization at molecular scale: The role of metal cations and hydrogen bonds. Geoderma 2021, 401, 115237–115249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saqib Rashid, M.; Liu, G.; Yousaf, B.; Song, Y.; Ahmed, R.; Rehman, A.; Arif, M.; Irshad, S.; Cheema, A.I. Efficacy of rice husk biochar and compost amendments on the translocation, bioavailability, and heavy metals speciation in contaminated soil: Role of free radical production in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129805–129820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sarwar, N.; Saifullah; Malhi, S.S.; Zia, M.H.; Naeem, A.; Bibi, S.; Farid, G. Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, X.; Yuan, X.; Dong, L. Coal fly ash and straw immobilize Cu, Cd and Zn from mining wasteland. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2014, 12, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, P.; Sun, C.X.; Ye, X.Z.; Xiao, W.D.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q. The effect of biochar and crop straws on heavy metal bioavailability and plant accumulation in a Cd and Pb polluted soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 132, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Su, Y.; Kwong, R.W.M.; Tang, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, H. Straw return enhances the risks of metals in soil? Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111201–111210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hernandez-soriano, M.C.; Jimenez-lopez, J.C. Effects of soil water content and organic matter addition on the speciation and bioavailability of heavy metal. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 423, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, H.X.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, S.; Li, N.; Tao, L.; Wang, Y. Trace elements determination and health risk assessment of Tricholoma matsutake from Yunnan Province, China. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2020, 15, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Shen, T.; Shi, Y.D.; Yang, S.B.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.Q.; Wang, Y.Z.; Liu, H.G. Mineral element content in prized matsutake mushroom (Tricholoma matsutake) collected in China. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 672–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mleczek, M.; Budka, A.; Kalac, P.; Siwulski, M.; Niedzielski, P. Family and species as determinants modulating mineral composition of selected wild-growing mushroom species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zsigmond, A.R.; Fejer, I.R.; Kantor, I.; May, Z.; Urak, I. Influence of the urban environment on four mushroom species in the light of their elemental composition. Chemosphere 2023, 335, 139052–139060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, S.; Fu, Y.; Shi, M.; Wang, H.; Guo, J. Pollution level and risk assessment of lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic in edible mushrooms from Jilin Province, China. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 3374–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gucia, M.; Jarzynska, G.; Rafal, E.; Roszak, M.; Kojta, A.K.; Osiej, I.; Falandysz, J. Multivariate analysis of mineral constituents of edible Parasol Mushroom (Macrolepiota procera) and soils beneath fruiting bodies collected from Northern Poland. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 416–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tuzen, M.; Sesli, E.; Soylak, M. Trace element levels of mushroom species from East Black Sea region of Turkey. Food Control 2007, 18, 806–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mirończuk-Chodakowska, I.; Socha, K.; Zujko, M.E.; Terlikowska, K.M.; Borawska, M.H.; Witkowska, A.M. Copper, manganese, selenium and zinc in wild-growing edible mushrooms from the eastern territory of “Green Lungs of Poland”: Nutritional and toxicological implications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3614–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Svoboda, L.; Zimmermannová, K.; Kalač, P. Concentrations of mercury, cadmium, lead and copper in fruiting bodies of edible mushrooms in an emission area of a copper smelter and a mercury smelter. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 246, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Falandysz, J.; Hanć, A.; Barałkiewicz, D.; Zhang, J.; Treu, R. Metallic and metalloid elements in various developmental stages of Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam. Fungal Biol. 2020, 124, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Demirbaş, A. Heavy metal bioaccumulation by mushrooms from artificially fortified soils. Food Chem. 2001, 74, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lalotra, P.; Gupta, D.; Yangdol, R.; Sharma, Y.P.; Gupta, S.K. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the sporocarps of some wild mushrooms. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2016, 6, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Damodaran, D.; Vidya Shetty, K.; Raj Mohan, B. Uptake of certain heavy metals from contaminated soil by mushroom–Galerina vittiformis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kokkoris, V.; Massas, I.; Polemis, E.; Koutrotsios, G.; Zervakis, G.I. Accumulation of heavy metals by wild edible mushrooms with respect to soil substrates in the Athens metropolitan area (Greece). Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 280–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barea-Sepulveda, M.; Espada-Bellido, E.; Ferreiro-Gonzalez, M.; Bouziane, H.; Lopez-Castillo, J.G.; Palma, M.F.; Barbero, G.F. Toxic elements and trace elements in Macrolepiota procera mushrooms from southern Spain and northern Morocco. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 108, 104419–104430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gadd, G.M. Interactions of fungi with toxic metals. New Phytol. 1993, 124, 25–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Barea-Sepúlveda, M.; Espada-Bellido, E.; Ferreiro-González, M.; Benítez-Rodríguez, A.; López-Castillo, J.G.; Palma, M.; Barbero, G.F. Metal concentrations in Lactarius mushroom species collected from Southern Spain and Northern Morocco: Evaluation of health risks and benefits. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 99, 103859–103868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barea-Sepúlveda, M.; Espada-Bellido, E.; Ferreiro-González, M.; Bouziane, H.; López-Castillo, J.G.; Palma, M.; Barbero, G.F. Exposure to Essential and Toxic Elements via Consumption of Agaricaceae, Amanitaceae, Boletaceae, and Russulaceae Mushrooms from Southern Spain and Northern Morocco. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Keskin, F.; Sarikurkcu, C.; Akata, I.; Tepe, B. Metal concentrations of wild mushroom species collected from Belgrad forest (Istanbul, Turkey) with their health risk assessments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 36193–36204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ziarati, P.; Rabizadeh, H. The Effect of Thermal and Non Thermal Food Processes and Cooking Method in some Essential Mineral Contents in Mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) in Iran. J. Novel Appl. Sci. 2013, 2, 954–959. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sarikurkcu, C.; Popović-Djordjević, J.; Solak, M.H. Wild edible mushrooms from Mediterranean region: Metal concentrations and health risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110058–110064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, L.; Min, J.; Wang, F. Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis in health and disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 378–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Su, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y. Determination of mineral contents of wild Boletus edulis mushroom and its edible safety assessment. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2018, 53, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Proskura, N.; Podlasinska, J.; Skopicz-Radkiewicz, L. Chemical composition and bioaccumulation ability of Boletus badius (Fr.) Fr. collected in western Poland. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of 54 sampling sits in Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14), Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
Figure 1. Distribution of 54 sampling sits in Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14), Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
Jof 10 00608 g001
Figure 2. Metals (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) concentration in soils (A) and variations between the regions of Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14) (B). The bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles and the error bars represent the minimum and maximum values within the normal range. The solid lines inside the box represent the median value.
Figure 2. Metals (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) concentration in soils (A) and variations between the regions of Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14) (B). The bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles and the error bars represent the minimum and maximum values within the normal range. The solid lines inside the box represent the median value.
Jof 10 00608 g002
Figure 3. Metals (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) concentrations in T. matsutake cap and stipe and comparisons between the regions of Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14). The bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles and the error bars represent the minimum and maximum values within the normal range. The solid lines inside the box represent the median value.
Figure 3. Metals (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) concentrations in T. matsutake cap and stipe and comparisons between the regions of Luoji (n = 40) and Jiantang (n = 14). The bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles and the error bars represent the minimum and maximum values within the normal range. The solid lines inside the box represent the median value.
Jof 10 00608 g003
Figure 4. Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in cap (A) and stipe (B) and the translocation factor (TF) (C) in T. matsutake (n = 54). BAF > 1 and TF > 1 (red line) indicates that T. matsutake possesses accumulating or stipe-to-cap translocating ability towards the given element, respectively.
Figure 4. Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in cap (A) and stipe (B) and the translocation factor (TF) (C) in T. matsutake (n = 54). BAF > 1 and TF > 1 (red line) indicates that T. matsutake possesses accumulating or stipe-to-cap translocating ability towards the given element, respectively.
Jof 10 00608 g004
Figure 5. Health risk index (HRI) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu via ingestion of T. matsutake cap (A) and stipe (B) (n = 54). HRI > 1 (blue line) indicates there is a potential health risk of the element via consumption of the T. matsutake cap or stipe.
Figure 5. Health risk index (HRI) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu via ingestion of T. matsutake cap (A) and stipe (B) (n = 54). HRI > 1 (blue line) indicates there is a potential health risk of the element via consumption of the T. matsutake cap or stipe.
Jof 10 00608 g005
Figure 6. Correlations of metals (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) concentration in T. matsutake cap and stipe with soil pH, organic matter content (OM) and metals concentration with significance at p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.01 (**).
Figure 6. Correlations of metals (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) concentration in T. matsutake cap and stipe with soil pH, organic matter content (OM) and metals concentration with significance at p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.01 (**).
Jof 10 00608 g006
Table 1. Soil pH and organic matter content and daily intake (DI) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu via ingestion of T. matsutake cap and stipe from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
Table 1. Soil pH and organic matter content and daily intake (DI) of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu via ingestion of T. matsutake cap and stipe from Yunnan Province, Southwest China.
Sample IDSoil pHSoil Organic Matter Content (%)DI (µg kg−1 bw d−1)
FeMnZnCu
CapStipeCapStipeCapStipeCapStipe
14.576.961413 244 34.7 30.5 81.6 50.9 62.1 35.2
25.3311.9689 493 26.0 16.2 75.6 34.1 53.1 25.2
34.328.791708 2464 50.9 20.3 77.8 36.5 59.9 27.1
44.3910.61437 3564 26.4 37.2 53.2 44.3 37.8 31.4
54.6413.71013 2412 37.0 34.4 69.3 45.2 34.0 35.5
64.589.63596 416 26.5 11.0 55.8 23.3 31.8 18.8
74.329.581115 1613 43.0 25.3 88.0 49.0 60.3 29.1
84.99181303 2301 27.0 19.2 63.7 37.3 47.4 28.5
95.0227.82033 3077 39.9 26.6 74.8 32.5 47.6 22.4
104.193.862097 6799 33.0 39.8 63.5 53.4 39.8 37.4
115.0611.41329 6857 45.8 54.0 98.6 55.6 68.5 39.5
124.067.71948 7216 50.8 82.2 98.7 44.6 82.2 33.0
134.327.871416 8058 34.3 49.2 73.0 47.1 44.8 28.7
144.7410.61033 1073 22.8 12.9 56.2 30.0 39.1 26.0
154.231.291119 2132 40.4 22.9 65.9 38.2 48.1 24.6
164.845.07727 3145 26.8 29.0 55.2 32.7 36.3 25.3
174.686.84697 3495 38.6 33.1 52.9 28.0 30.8 18.4
184.8315.11330 4760 25.5 24.4 73.7 38.7 71.6 32.7
194.86.231964 3912 34.3 26.9 89.4 52.6 65.4 33.8
204.3117.3935 2419 29.2 26.4 65.5 44.1 43.0 27.2
214.813.771434 1784 67.4 27.7 79.0 51.5 51.2 28.7
224.136.21836 1695 34.8 22.3 52.7 31.4 25.6 19.9
234.5211.11907 2185 30.6 19.9 80.4 40.1 47.7 21.7
244.262.781253 1427 33.3 16.1 70.7 35.5 41.7 25.6
254.127.551246 3285 19.4 16.4 71.1 39.9 39.3 19.4
264.13.85667 840 39.7 21.6 67.0 34.1 34.9 19.1
274.76.2860 2811 37.1 20.1 78.5 40.1 49.2 26.8
284.486.681008 2877 51.1 26.8 94.2 46.7 51.3 22.3
294.443.092099 3081 26.5 30.7 58.1 34.3 40.5 26.7
304.1944.5962 1764 60.7 40.0 99.1 43.2 64.4 24.6
314.578.41178 4609 29.9 28.7 63.3 42.2 46.6 28.2
324.28.61669 2996 14.5 18.1 46.9 32.0 31.4 23.9
334.5510.3810 5716 26.4 36.5 73.3 46.1 50.5 31.0
344.748.76584 1733 15.6 14.3 46.2 23.4 23.8 21.8
353.9512.21250 2414 26.7 22.8 72.8 36.7 52.0 25.4
364.8910.6566 2739 15.2 20.0 62.5 33.4 36.1 19.3
374.668.771005 3172 22.5 28.7 52.9 41.0 31.2 25.1
384.685.59539 1485 36.0 23.3 76.5 40.8 43.8 24.8
394.557.711175 1479 30.5 16.2 83.5 29.4 54.1 21.1
404.6810.6800 3722 30.4 39.0 86.6 49.3 58.3 30.3
416.375.53417 627 61.8 34.5 93.6 27.1 26.6 13.1
425.5210.3261 2027 103 63774.7 38.9 44.0 19.8
435.9413.4408 2473 60.1 12882.7 39.2 59.6 24.8
445.087.12490 744 49.9 56.5 44.5 23.9 27.1 15.0
456.294.48335 2092 26.0 29.4 48.0 28.0 17.4 16.7
466.118.74418 5031 90.8 57.3 81.1 36.9 37.8 17.9
474.797.49102 217 12.3 9.0 43.9 20.0 18.0 10.7
485.9610.6334 861 39.6 25.3 67.5 27.0 35.8 13.3
496.36.51273 1293 44.1 61.0 75.3 44.5 51.1 26.4
505.9612.9472 1502 56.2 25.8 35.5 16.6 42.2 17.9
515.383.94650 2156 66.1 77.7 66.0 38.1 41.6 22.6
526.2521.3192 385 20.5 24.5 93.7 36.2 51.3 19.5
535.797.12306 177 39.3 20.6 14137.1 93.2 20.6
546.5615.3465 1476 59.1 80.6 57.2 30.4 27.3 15.2
RfD a (µg kg1 bw d1)300 (JECEFA) c140 (USEPA) d300 d40 d
PTMDI b (µg kg1 bw d1)300–1000 c 5000 c
Percentage of samples exceeding RfD (%)92.6%94.4%01.85%0061.1%0
Percentage of samples exceeding PTMDI (%)0000
a RfD: Reference dose. b PTMDI: Provisional maximum tolerable daily intake. c JECEFA: The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. d USEPA: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Bi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Metals Transfer in Mushroom Tricholoma matsutake from Regional High Geochemical Background Areas: Environmental Influences and Human Health Risk. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090608

AMA Style

Wang C, Bi J, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu X. Metals Transfer in Mushroom Tricholoma matsutake from Regional High Geochemical Background Areas: Environmental Influences and Human Health Risk. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(9):608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Cuiting, Jue Bi, Yukang Zhang, Yixuan Zhang, and Xue Liu. 2024. "Metals Transfer in Mushroom Tricholoma matsutake from Regional High Geochemical Background Areas: Environmental Influences and Human Health Risk" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 9: 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop