Next Article in Journal
Traditional and Latest Researches on Aspergillus oryzae and Related Koji Molds
Next Article in Special Issue
Ecological and Oceanographic Perspectives in Future Marine Fungal Taxonomy
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Native Entomopathogenic Fungi for the Control of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Thailand: A Sustainable Way for Eco-Friendly Agriculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/jof7121074
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain)

by
Maia Azpiazu-Muniozguren
1,
Alba Perez
1,
Aitor Rementeria
2,
Irati Martinez-Malaxetxebarria
1,
Rodrigo Alonso
1,
Lorena Laorden
1,
Javier Gamboa
3,
Joseba Bikandi
1,
Javier Garaizar
1 and
Ilargi Martinez-Ballesteros
1,*
1
MikroIker Research Group, Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
2
Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
3
Biogenetics, Portal de Zurbano 3, 6-B, 01013 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(12), 1074; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121074
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 14 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aquatic Fungi: From Natural Ecosystems to Unusual Habitats (or) under Environmental Changes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Añana Salt Valley in Spain is an active continental solar saltern formed 220 million years ago. To date, no fungal genomic studies of continental salterns have been published, although DNA metabarcoding has recently expanded researchers’ ability to study microbial community structures. Accordingly, the aim of this present study was to evaluate fungal diversity using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) metabarcoding at different locations along the saltern (springs, ponds, and groundwater) to describe the fungal community of this saline environment. A total of 380 fungal genera were detected. The ubiquity of Saccharomyces was observed in the saltern, although other halotolerant and halophilic fungi like Wallemia, Cladosporium, and Trimmatostroma were also detected. Most of the fungi observed in the saltern were saprotrophs. The fungal distribution appeared to be influenced by surrounding conditions, such as the plant and soil contact, cereal fields, and vineyards of this agricultural region.

1. Introduction

Saline and hypersaline environments are widely distributed around the world. The study of these habitats is becoming more common, not only as a means to increase knowledge regarding the structure of their microbial communities but also to gain insights into the adaptations of these organisms to these unique locations. Among hypersaline environments, solar salterns are of particular interest. Different types of salterns exist that may be classified as littoral salterns and continental or inland salterns. Continental salterns are those that use brine obtained from spring sources, for the production of salt via evaporation and solar activity [1].
The Añana Salt Valley (30 km southwest of Vitoria-Gasteiz, Álava, Northern Spain; 42.80 N 2.98 W) is an active continental solar saltern formed about 220 million years ago following the evaporation of water from the great ocean (Tethys Ocean) that covered most of the Earth. This process led to the deposit of extensive layers of evaporites (salts, anhydrite, and gypsum), which, emanating from highly plastic stratigraphic levels and subjected to great pressure, rose through the sedimentary layers of the Earth’s crust, crossing and deforming these layers and resulting in the formation of a diapir. Rainwater crosses the upper stratum of the diapir rock, and then layers of salt appear on the surface decades later in the form of hypersaline or brackish springs [2]. Depending on the path the filtrated water takes through the rocks, it encounters areas of higher or lower salt content. For this reason, springs that are next to each other contain water with different levels of salinity.
The hypersaline springs located in the Añana Salt Valley are water sources that supply brine at the surface level in a natural and continuous way without any need for drilling or for the use of pumps. Archaeological remains show that these water sources have been used by locals for 7000 years, for the extraction of salt [3,4]. Consequently, the physical, chemical, and anthropogenic characteristics of the Añana Salt Valley environment make it an exceptional setting for study and research. What is more, these salt flats contain deposits with important paleo-environmental and paleo-climatic information, in addition to the biodiversity of their extreme environments [3,4].
For many years, saline and hypersaline environments were thought to be populated almost exclusively by prokaryotic microorganisms. Recently, it has been shown that eukaryotic microorganisms are present too [5,6,7]. Studies regarding prokaryotic diversity and distribution have been conducted at different salterns using both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods [8,9,10,11,12]. Fewer studies have been conducted on the examination of fungal communities [13,14,15]. In the last few years, DNA metabarcoding has become an effective tool for the identification of yeast and other fungal species. Different studies have been conducted on soil, marine, and saline ecosystems; vineyards and wine-production systems; and in glaciers [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], among other ecosystems. Although a study on prokaryotic and virus diversity in the Añana Salt Valley has been published [24], no fungal metabarcoding survey in this ecosystem has been published nor of other continental or inland salterns worldwide. The aim of this present study, therefore, was to evaluate fungal diversity in the extreme ecosystem of the Añana Salt Valley using metabarcoding to describe the composition of the fungi present in this location.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Proceedings

Water samples from diverse sites around the Añana Salt Valley were collected to perform the fungal diversity study (Figure 1). Individual water samples from each of the seven sites were collected during the survey and studied for fungal diversity. Two of these sites, Santa Engracia (SE) Spring and Pico Spring, were springs containing high-salinity water. SE Spring is the main brine supplier for salt production in the saltern, with an average flow of 3 L/s and 200 g of salt/L. Pico Spring provides a lower brine flow to the system. The salt production brine is distributed by an interconnected wooden canal system, channeling the brine to a series of distribution ponds and crystallizing pans. Three of these ponds (Pond I, II, and III), containing high-salinity water and located along the salt-production system, were also selected for this study. In the valley, other springs with a lower-salinity water content arise naturally. From among these, brackish water from the Pico Dulce Spring was analyzed. Finally, brackish groundwater from an aquifer at 60 m depth, accessible through a piezometer called S8, was also analyzed. Water samples were collected in October 2017 (SE, Pico Spring, and ponds) and in June 2018 (S8 and Pico Dulce Spring).
Water samples were directly obtained using sterile glass bottles or a Niskin bottle (Aquatic BioTechnology, El Puerto de Santa María, Spain). Groundwater from the S8 piezometer was taken at a 60 m depth using a manual bailer system (Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, The Nederlands). Physicochemical parameters, such as water temperature, pH, NaCl concentration, and conductivity (related to salt content), were determined in situ (Combo tester, Hanna Instruments, Eibar, Spain). Water samples were taken directly to the laboratory for processing.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Samples were enriched by filtering approximately 5 L of water in aseptic conditions through a tailored device, driven by vacuum/compression pumps, which concentrated the samples via a series of decreasing flow-rate polycarbonate membranes (Labbox, Premia de Dalt, Spain), ending in a 0.2 μm pore size filter. DNA extraction and quantification of the samples were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions via the Genomic Mini AX Yeast Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdansk, Poland) and the QuantiFluor dsDNA System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), respectively. The fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was amplified, as suggested in the ITS Metagenomics Protocol of Illumina by modified ITS1-F and ITS2 primers set [25]. The library was prepared by a Nextera DNA Library prep kit (Ilumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to that protocol. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform, which generates paired-end sequences in FASTQ format. The nucleotide sequence data from the study are available in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under the accession number PRJNA749727.

2.3. Sequencing Data and Statistical Analysis

Most of the analyses was carried out using QIIME2 version 2021.2 software tools and pipelines [26]. Joining of paired-end reads, sequence quality control, and feature table construction were performed by denoising with DADA2 plugin (q2-dada2) [27]. During this step, sequence denoising, dereplication, and chimera filtering were undertaken. Sequences were trimmed at a 200 bp length. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) [28] generated by DADA2 were assigned taxonomically using the q2-feature-classifier [29] classify-sklearn naïve Bayes taxonomy classifier with the UNITE 8.3 dynamic database [30] at 97% similarity level. Manually searching of unidentified ASVs was performed by BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 6 October 2021).
Alpha and beta diversity metrics were estimated using q2-diversity plunging after rarefaction of the samples to 2270 sequences per sample. Alpha diversity estimators, such as observed ASVs and Chao1 index, were determined to establish the species richness at each point. To study the diversity of the species in the samples, α estimators, such as Shannon and Simpson indexes, were used: the higher the Shannon index, the greater the diversity, and the closer the Simpson index is to 0, the lower the diversity. Pielou’s evenness, which quantifies how equal a community is, was also determined (the closer to 0, the higher the dominance of a species). Statistical significance of the alpha diversity values between sampling sites was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. To establish the correlation of diversity indexes with physicochemical characteristics, Pearson’s coefficient test was performed (p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Dissimilarity between sample groups was also examined by the Bray–Curtis coefficient and differences among groups were assessed by ANOSIM with 999 permutations (p < 0.05). A heatmap was performed by ggplot2 R package to visualize differences at the genus level composition among samples. Associations between samples were established by the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Venn analysis was performed by Venn diagram software (available online at: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/, accessed on 21 July 2021) to determine common and unique fungal taxa on samples.
The FUNGuild database was used to assign ecological guilds within three trophic modes (i.e., pathotroph, symbiotroph, and saprotroph) to all ASVs [31]. Only fungal ASVs with probable and highly probable confidence matches were considered for further analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Water Physicochemical Data

The physicochemical characteristics of water samples measured in situ are shown in Table S1. Two different degrees of salinity were observed, which were used to establish groups for further analysis: SE Spring, Pico Spring, and the three brine ponds were classified as salty water, and Pico Dulce Spring and S8 piezometer were classified as brackish water due to their lower salt concentration.

3.2. Sequence Analysis and ASV Determination

The fungal diversity and community structure in the water samples taken from representative sites in the Añana Salt Valley were investigated by HTS (Figure 1). After denoising and quality control of sequenced DNA, a mean of 132,520 reads per sample was obtained. A total of 704,874 sequences were obtained corresponding to 2204 different ASVs determined by DADA2. These ASVs were subsequently assigned at different taxonomy levels for fungal identification. Among the ASVs, 853 failed to be identified at any known phylum (38.7% of the total).

3.3. Fungal Diversity in the Saltern

Rarefaction curves were computed by rarefying each sample to the minimum number of sequences (2270 reads). Rarefaction curves were not parallel for all the samples analyzed but started to flatten (Figure S1). The alpha diversity was calculated after normalization of the samples. Table 1 shows the taxa richness and diversity values obtained by the different alpha diversity estimators. SE Spring had the lowest diversity. There, the smallest number of ASVs (71 ASVs) was detected and the Shannon index was 3.59 (ranging from 4.89–6.47 for the rest of the locations). The other six locations demonstrated a similar diversity, except for S8, which was less diverse. While 93 ASVs and a Shannon index of 4.89 were obtained at S8, the observed ASVs from the other five locations ranged from 262–396 and the Shannon index ranged from 5.44–6.47. Pielou’s evenness of SE was 0.58 (the closest value to 0 in the study), which indicated the presence of a dominant taxon (presumably Saccharomyces). No statistically significant differences were observed in the alpha diversity indexes between sample sites.
The diversity and pH showed a statistically significant correlation based on Pearson’s coefficient test (Table 2), indicating that environmental diversity decreases as the pH of the water decreases too. No correlation was observed in regard to the NaCl concentration or temperature.
The ANOSIM test based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity identified differences in the fungal diversity among groups based on their salinity (salty and brackish water) (p-value 0.046). No differences were observed regarding different water types (spring, pond, or groundwater).

3.4. Fungal Taxonomic Assignment and Community Composition

The taxonomic assignment of ASVs showed that Basidiomycota and Ascomycota were the phyla present in the saltern (0.18–63.6% and 23–81.1%, respectively) (Figure 2). No other fungal phylum was detected in the samples. As referenced above, 38.7% of the ASVs were classified only as fungi. The manual identification of unidentified ASVs by BLAST search did not improve these results, so a low taxonomic assignment to the species level was obtained in the study. The taxonomic assignment of each ASV can be found in Table S2. A total of 380 fungal genera were detected in the survey (Table S3). In Figure 2, genera whose relative abundance was more than 3% in at least one of the locations analyzed at the saltern are shown. Regarding SE Spring, 30 ASVs were taxonomically assigned to genus level; 184 with respect to Pico Spring; 147, 196, and 110 genera with respect to Pond I, II, and III, respectively; 81 at Pico Dulce Spring; and 28 genera at S8.
The relative abundance of the genera varied among the sampling sites. Saccharomyces was present at all locations; its relative abundance ranged from 1.5–49.9%. Several other genera were also detected at all of the sites, including Hanseniaspora (0.2–21.9%), Mycosphaerella (0.4–3.8%), Vishniacozyma (0.1–24.2%), and Alternaria (0.1–2.4%).
SE Spring was characterized principally by the presence of Saccharomyces (49.9%) and Hanseniaspora (21.9%). At Pico Spring, Saccharomyces was also detected (8.4%), followed by Peniophora as the second most abundant genus (4.3%). The three ponds analyzed along the salt-production system have several genera in common, but the fungal composition differed between them. Pond I was mainly comprised of Wallemia, Filobasidium, and Vishniacozyma genera (24%, 18.1%, and 11.2%, respectively). Pond II was comprised of Filobasidium and Epicoccum (10% and 7.5%), and at Pond III, Saccharomyces and Epicoccum were mainly detected (20.1% and 8%). The principal genus that made up the fungal community of the low-salinity Pico Dulce Spring water was Vishniacozyma (18.4%). This genus was also detected in groundwater from S8 piezometer (24.2%). Pichia was also detected (12.6%) as the second most abundant genus at this location.
In total, 617 ASVs were able to be identified to the species level (28% of the total ASVs). Thirty-seven different species were detected at SE Spring; 188 at Pico Spring; 129, 92, and 179 species at Pond I, II, and III, respectively; 54 at Pico Dulce Spring; and 20 at S8. Table S4 shows species whose relative abundance is higher than 0.5% at each location. Pichia mandshurica, Cladosporium delicatulum, and Mycospharella tassiana were the main species detected in brackish water samples. The presence of C. delicatulum and M. tassiana was also notable in the ponds. Wallemia ichthyophaga was the most abundant species detected at Pond I (24%) and Epicoccum dendrobii at Pond II and III (6.5% and 7.7%, respectively). Vishniacozyma victoriae was largely found also at Pond I and II (10.5% and 2.8%, respectively). Salty springs, SE Spring and Pico Spring, had different species compositions compared to the other sampling sites, and between them. At SE Spring, Saccharomyces bayanus, Metsechnikowia shanxiensis, and Lachancea quebecensis were the main species identified (3.4%, 2.7%, and 1.7%, respectively). Stereum hirsutum (1.2%), Resupinatus europeus (1.1%), and Keissleriella rosarum (1%) were found at Pico Spring.
The distribution of the most representative genera (>1% in at least one of the samples) among the sampling sites is shown in the heatmap (Figure 3). Although some genera were detected in all of the samples, different composition profiles at the genus level can be defined. The clustering performed by the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficient based on the genera abundance showed that SE Spring differs from the rest of the sites analyzed, and that brackish water sites are more similar to each other than to other salty water locations (Figure 3).
As mentioned above, five genera were common among all the samples analyzed: Saccharomyces, Alternaria, Mycosphaerella, Hanseniaspora, and Vishniacozyma. Unique fungal taxa were detected from each sample site, with the exception of S8. From SE Spring, 17 taxa were identified as exclusive to this location and 30 were present only at Pico Dulce Spring. The ponds showed the highest number of unique taxa, with 47, 118, and 31 taxa identified for Ponds I, II, and III, respectively. When analysis was carried out according to the water salinity of the locations, 89 common fungal taxa were identified for salty and brackish water types; however, 516 and 40 were unique to salty and brackish water, respectively (Figure 2).

3.5. Fungal Functional Guilds

FUNGuild was used to identify fungal ecological functions at each sampling site (Figure 4). A notably different fungal functional profile was identified at SE Spring. It was mainly composed of saprotrophs (95.5%), while the rest of the trophic modes represented a minor abundance or none. At Pico Spring and Pond I, II, and III, saprotrophs were also in the greatest abundance (73.1%, 85.4%, 54.2%, and 42.7%, respectively), although pathotrophs (5.2%, 5.7%, 16.8%, and 21.6%), pathotroph−saprotrophs (17.4%, 5.1% 6.0%, and 7.4%), and pathotroph−saprotroph−symbiotrophs (2.9%, 1.8%, 17.8%, and 20.8%) were also detected. In addition, symbiotrophs were detected only at those locations, albeit at a low-abundance percentage. By contrast, Pico Dulce Spring water and S8 groundwater were composed mainly of pathotroph-saprotophs (40.1% and 42.2%, respectively), followed by saprotrophs (34.3%) at Pico Dulce, and pathotroph-saprotroph-symbiotrophs (32.8%) in S8 groundwater.
The rest of the trophic modes were present in less than 5%. The saprotrophs comprised mainly undefined saprotrophic fungi. Pathotrophs consisted of plant pathogens at all sampling sites apart from SE Spring, where animal pathogens were the main guild in this mode. Symbiotrophs were mainly dominated by lichenized and epiphytic fungi.

4. Discussion

Hypersaline environments are extreme habitats about which there is very little information. Most of the studies conducted in relation to such ecosystems have aimed to study prokaryotic microorganisms, although few surveys have considered fungal community studies as a part of their objectives. It is now known that eukaryotic microorganisms are also part of these unique ecosystems. Recent diversity surveys using sequencing approaches have demonstrated that fungi colonize a wide variety of aquatic ecosystems and that they possess unique adaptations methods for life in a saline-water environment [32,33]. For this present study, we aimed to determine and understand the fungal composition of the Añana Salt Valley continental solar saltern. For this purpose, various locations across the valley (spring water and groundwater) and ponds along the salt-production system (brine distribution and resting ponds) were studied using ITS metabarcoding analysis. Nonetheless, the presence of fungal DNA must be carefully interpreted as it could simply represent the casual presence in these habitats of dead cells or spores transmitted by insects, birds, plants, human activities, or the wind.
Fungal taxa identified at Añana Salt Valley were Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. In particular, Ascomycota members were more frequently detected than Basidiomycota. These results were also previously observed in deep ocean ecosystems [34], saline soils [35], deep-sea sediments [36,37], and in other salterns [14]. Furthermore, Wei et al. [15] have recently described the fungal composition of a millennial coastal saltern in South China, where the fungal community was different from that which was detected in the continental saltern of this study.
Among the Ascomycota phylum, Saccharomyces was the most abundant yeast detected in the saltern. This ubiquitous organism is widely distributed in different environments from natural to domesticated strains [38]. The capacity to adapt to saline conditions is also known in Saccharomyces strains [39]; therefore, on account of this ability and the proximity of cereal cultivation areas and vineyards to the saltern, it is reasonable to detect this yeast extensively throughout this habitat. Specifically, S. bayanus, detected in SE Spring, has been previously found to be a yeast associated with the winemaking process [40]. Other halotolerant fungi, such as Cladosporium, Trimmatostroma, and Penicillum, or the osmotolerant yeasts Candida, Metschnikowia, and Pichia, previously described in salty environments [7,14,15], have been detected in this continental saltern too. Several species of Cladosporium are considered true halophiles that are present in hypersaline environments of different geographical areas [41], and the presence of the halophilic Trimmatostroma has been associated with Adriatic salterns [42]. In addition, the genera Metschnikowia, Hanseniaspora, Candida, and Taphrina are typically associated with winemaking environments. In fact, Metschnikowia has been recovered from grapevine phyllospheres, fruit flies, grapes, and wine ferments, as part of the resident microbiota of wineries and winemaking equipment [43], while Hanseniaspora has been isolated in grape must, and in the winery environment [44]. Both Candida and Taphrina genera have been described as being associated with the grape berry microbial community, albeit as a minor percentage [45]. The presence of winemaking-related fungal genera could be the result of contamination via agriculture, possibly due to the proximity of significant cereal- and wine-producing areas of La Rioja, which borders the Añana Salt Valley. We may hypothesize that the proximity of vineyards, along with the relationship of the filtered rainwater to the spring water, could transport these fungi, which, in turn, end up in the colonization of the saltern, in addition to the fact that some of them have the ability to adapt to saline conditions.
Among the Basidiomycota phylum, Wallemia was the only halophilic fungi detected in the saltern. This genus comprises one of the most xerophilic fungi ever described. Obligate halophilic species, such as W. ichthyophaga or W. muriae, have been described from brine of solar salterns [46]. In this study, W. ichthyophaga was detected in the brine. Other genera of the same phylum detected in our study were Vishniacozyma, Peniophora, Stereum, Filobasidium, and Trametes. Most of these are wood, plant, lichen, or fruit surface fungi distributed in natural environments. Specifically, Vishniacozyma victoriae and Stereum hirsutum, detected in this study, are related with lichens, mosses, and plants [47,48,49,50].
However, the high number of unassigned ASVs in this study, as has been observed in other natural environments [51,52], suggests that there are still fungal taxa to be discovered in this saltern. A large diversity of undescribed and unknown aquatic fungi, known as “dark matter fungi” [53], is usual in those environments [54], so a lack of taxonomy-associated sequences in databases could influence the low taxonomic assignment in metabarcoding-based environmental studies.
Furthermore, not all rarefaction curves reached a plateau due to the limitation in sequencing depth. As low sample numbers were studied, it was considered preferable to include all sampling sites in the study despite the possible loss of diversity. The number of sequences obtained in the study might be influenced by the salt content of the water. It is well known that in HTS procedures, the presence of salt during the hybridization stage decreases specificity, favoring less stable bonds [55]. This results in lower quality sequences, which could be eliminated in the quality control process. Alpha diversity obtained in this study clearly showed one specific location where a lower fungal richness and diversity was found in comparison to the other locations that were examined. This location was SE Spring. Its Pielou’s evenness value (0.58) and Simpson index (0.77) were the lowest, probably due to the dominance of Saccharomyces (relative abundance of 49.9%), which as mentioned previously, could have ended up in the SE Spring as a result of rainwater filtration from adjacent agricultural fields. S8 piezometer groundwater also has low diversity (93 ASVs and a Shannon index of 4.89 versus other locations ranging from 262 to 396 ASVs and Shannon indexes of 5.44–6.47). It is important to consider that in regard to the S8 piezometer, the water source is protected from external influence, as it is underground. Thus, the arrival of fungal taxa not specific to the groundwater is more difficult and this may be the reason fewer taxa are detected there. The other locations of the saltern analyzed in this study had greater external influence; thereby, the detection of more fungal taxa and higher diversity could be explained as a result of closer contact with plants and animals (mainly arthropods). Therefore, for future studies, we need to consider differences in water origin, surrounding biotic factors, as well as human activities that could be associated with fungal diversity at each site.
When the relation of water physicochemical parameters with diversity was studied, correlation between pH and fungal diversity was reported (p-value <0.05 for Shannon and Simpson indexes), showing that diversity decreases when pH decreases too. Liu et al. [56] also reported the same effect in soil samples, suggesting that pH could be an important predictor of fungal diversity. Bray–Curtis dissimilarity also showed that in this environment, fungi distribution is segregated in two different groups according to salinity: salty water and brackish water, statistically significantly dissimilar from each other. This phenomenon was also reported in a salinity gradient study on a marsh [57], suggesting that salinity influences distinctive fungal composition. Therefore, the diversity and composition results in this survey showed three differentiated water ecosystems in the saltern: the SE Spring, the two brackish-water sites, and the ponds and Pico Spring salty waters. This grouping accords with the clustering based on FUNGuild results, where these three groups were observed according to their trophic mode levels.
At SE Spring, the saprotrophic mode tends to be the most abundant life strategy. This result is supported by the dominance of Saccharomyces in this location, which is a well-known saprotroph. At Pico Spring and Ponds I, II, and III, the dominance of saprotrophs is also observed due to the presence of Saccharomyces and Peniophora. Peniophora acts as a saprotroph mainly on fallen branches and twigs but also on rotting trees [47]. The presence of saprotrophs is also due to Wallemia and Filobasidium, which are mainly plant-associated saprotrophs in saline and extreme environments [46,58]. Pico Spring is a natural spring that emanates directly from rocks in the mountains, surrounded by plants and soil. It is also interesting to consider that the structures of the channels that distribute the brine along the ponds in the saltern are constructed of wood. Therefore, the presence of wood-associated and plant-associated fungi could be enhanced in this environment. However, we could also see a considerable increment of pathotroph−saprotroph−symbiotrophs in Pond II and III due to the presence of Epicoccum dendrobii, which is a ubiquitous ascomycete. Some members of this genus are known to cause plant diseases, while others act as biological control agents against a range of plant pathogens [59]. The presence of the lichen parasite-lichenized guild in pathotroph-symbiotroph mode in Pond II and III is due to the abundance of the Lecanoraceae family. The pathotroph representation in these sampling sites is enhanced by the presence of the plant pathogen Mycosphaerella (probably M. tassiana) and the black yeast Trimmatostroma salinum. This last species was found growing in and on wood immersed in brine in another study [60]. It is thought that the presence of symbiont and saprotrophic fungi in saline environments might accelerate the leaching of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from the host, which then becomes available to other microorganisms in the marine environment [61], in this case, in the hypersaline one. Thus, the increment of fungal taxa associated with plants, lichens, and wood in these samples, especially in regard to Pond II and III, could be related to more direct environmental exposure and the possibility of obtaining substrates (of plant or animal origin) more easily in these sites than in others.
Finally, in relation to Pico Dulce Spring and S8 piezometer, the pathotroph-saprotroph trophic mode was the main mode. This could be explained by the presence of Ramularia, which is considered a plant pathogenic hyphomycete [62], Stemphylium, whose members were isolated from wood specimens of a boat and demonstrated ligninase activity [63] and the genus Didymella, composed of opportunistic parasitic microorganisms that often take advantage of special conditions to settle on plants and occasionally cause serious damage [64]. Furthermore, we found an increase of pathotroph-saprotroph-symbiotrophs, especially the animal endosymbiont-animal pathogen-plant pathogen-undefined saprotroph guild, stemming from the abundance of Vishniacozyma and Pichia at both sampling sites. Both have been previously reported on grape berries [65]. Moreover, the higher relative abundance of plant pathogens was due to the presence of the genus Mycosphaerella, which as mentioned previously is a large and important genus of plant pathogens.
These results showed the ubiquity of saprotrophs across the saltern. Our results demonstrated that the characteristics of the habitat determine the trophic guilds and the type of organisms present there. The fact that this continental saltern is surrounded by flora and fauna specific to the terrain and agricultural fields means that this environment presents mainly saprophytic organisms, with the presence of halotolerant and halophilic species among them. Furthermore, saprophytic fungi were more abundant in hypersaline water than in brackish water. In contrast, Yang and Sun [19] described a significantly lower abundance of plant saprotrophs and few saprotrophs in extremely saline soils in comparison with non-saline soils.

5. Conclusions

This is the first study conducted on a continental-type solar saltern using metabarcoding sequencing technology based on ITS with the aim of examining fungal presence. It seems that this type of habitat is not solely influenced by the salinity itself. Other surrounding factors also have a direct or indirect influence regarding the distribution and appearance of fungal species, which in this case are distributed across at least three different aquatic systems. We sought to explore the reasons for the variation in the fungal composition among different locations in the valley, which needs to be further studied and examined with respect to additional environmental factors, such as rain, wind, vegetation, animal presence, or the relationship with the diapir. Nevertheless, the results contribute valuable information for increasing the understanding of how geographic location (mainly its relatedness to nearby vineyards and cereal fields), salinity, and environmental factors may play an important role in shaping the fungal presence in this saltern.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7121074/s1, Figure S1: Rarefaction curves representing the ASVs (observed features) at different sequencing depths. Each curve represents an analyzed location that corresponds with the color of the legend, Table S1: Sampling site information and physicochemical characteristics of the water at each location measured in situ at the moment of sampling, Table S2: Taxonomic assignment of the ASVs obtained in the study and their relative abundance at each location in the saltern, Table S3: Relative abundance (%) of the genera detected at each sampling site in the saltern of Añana Salt Valley. The results are presented classified by phylum (Ascomycota or Basidiomycota). The percentage of the unclassified ASVs at genus level at each location is also shown, Table S4: Species identified at the locations analyzed in the saltern. Species with a relative abundance >0.5% are shown.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. (Javier Garaizar), J.B. and J.G. (Javier Gamboa); methodology, J.G. (Javier Gamboa), I.M.-B. and J.G. (Javier Garaizar); formal analysis, L.L., M.A.-M., I.M.-B., A.P., A.R., I.M.-M. and R.A.; resources, A.R. and J.B.; data curation, L.L., M.A.-M., I.M.-B., A.P., A.R., I.M.-M. and R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G. (Javier Garaizar), M.A.-M. and I.M.-B.; writing—review and editing, I.M.-B.; funding acquisition, J.G. (Javier Garaizar) and I.M.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU grant number US19/01 and the Añana Salt Valley Foundation (Specific Agreement between the Añana Salt Valley Foundation and the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The nucleotide sequence data from the study obtained after Illumina sequencing are available in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under the accession number PRJNA749727. Other data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hueso, K.; Carrasco, J.F. Las salinas de interior, un patrimonio desconocido y amenazado. Def. Patrim. Geológico Min. 2006, 6–7, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Murelaga, X.; Zuluaga, M.C.; Alonso, A.; Baceta, J.I.; Ortega, L.O. Guía Geológica del Diapiro de Valle Salado de Añana, 1st ed.; Diputación Foral de Álava: Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Plata-Montero, A. El Ciclo Productivo de la Sal y las Salinas Reales a Mediados del Siglo XIX, 1st ed.; Diputación Foral de Álava: Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Plata-Montero, A.; Landa, M. Pasado, presente y futuro del Valle Salado de Salinas de Añana (Álava, País Vasco). Rev. Int. Estud. Vascos. 2011, 56, 719–739. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Polona, Z.; de Hoog, S.; Plemenitaš, A. Hypersaline waters in salterns-natural ecological niches for halophilic black yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2000, 32, 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gostinčar, C.; Grube, M.; De Hoog, S.; Zalar, P.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Extremotolerance in fungi: Evolution on the edge. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 71, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chung, D.; Kim, H.; Choi, H.S. Fungi in salterns. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ventosa, A.; Fernández, A.B.; León, M.J.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Rodriguez-Valera, F. The Santa Pola saltern as a model for studying the microbiota of hypersaline environments. Extremophiles 2014, 18, 811–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Çınar, S.; Mutlu, M.B. Comparative analysis of prokaryotic diversity in solar salterns in eastern Anatolia (Turkey). Extremophiles 2016, 20, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Meglio, L.; Santos, F.; Gomariz, M.; Almansa, C.; López, C.; Antón, J.; Nercessian, D. Seasonal dynamics of extremely halophilic microbial communities in three Argentinian salterns. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Couto-Rodríguez, R.L.; Montalvo-Rodríguez, R. Temporal analysis of the microbial community from the crystallizer ponds in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, using metagenomics. Genes 2019, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, S.; Xu, Y.; Helfant, L. Geographical isolation, buried depth, and physicochemical traits drive the variation of species diversity and prokaryotic community in three typical hypersaline environments. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Filker, S.; Gimmler, A.; Dunthorn, M. Deep sequencing uncovers protistan plankton diversity in the Portuguese Ria Formosa solar saltern ponds. Extremophiles 2015, 19, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heo, Y.M.; Lee, H.; Kwon, S.L.; Park, M.Y.; Kang, J.E.; Kim, G.-H.; Kim, B.S.; Kim, J.-J. Fungal diversity in intertidal mudflats and abandoned solar salterns as a source for biological resources. Mar Drugs 2019, 17, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wei, Y.-L.; Long, Z.-J.; Ren, M.-X. Microbial community and functional prediction during the processing of salt production in a 1000-year-old marine solar saltern of South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 28, 152014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duo Saito, R.A.; Connell, L.; Rodriguez, R.; Redman, R.; Libkind, D.; de Garcia, V. Metabarcoding analysis of the fungal biodiversity associated with Castaño Overa Glacier—Mount Tronador, Patagonia, Argentina. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 36, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hugoni, M.; Escalas, A.; Bernard, C.; Nicolas, S.; Jézéquel, D.; Vazzoler, F.; Sarazin, G.; Leboulander, C.; Bouvy, M.; Got, P.; et al. Spatiotemporal variations in microbial diversity across the three domains of life in a tropical thalassohaline lake (Dziani Dzaha, Mayotte Island). Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 4775–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, P.D.; Jeewon, R.; Aruna, B.; Li, H.Y.; Lin, F.C.; Wang, H.K. Metabarcoding reveals differences in fungal communities between unflooded versus tidal flat soil in coastal saline ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 690, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, C.; Sun, J. Soil salinity drives the distribution patterns and ecological functions of Fungi in Saline-Alkali land in the Yellow River Delta, China. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 594284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dutra-Silva, L.; Pereira, G.E.; Batista, L.R.; Matteoli, F.P. Fungal diversity and occurrence of mycotoxin producing fungi in tropical vineyards. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, D.; Qu, J.; Huang, Y.; Lu, J.; Yin, L. Analysis of microbial community diversity of muscadine grape skins. Food Res. Int. 2021, 145, 110417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, S.; Xu, W.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Luo, Z.H. Fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments from Magellan seamounts environment of the western Pacific revealed by high-throughput Illumina sequencing. J. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, T.; Wang, N.F.; Yu, L.Y. Geographic distance and habitat type influence fungal communities in the Arctic and Antarctic sites. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 82, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ramos-Barbero, M.D.; Viver, T.; Zabaleta, A.; Senel, E.; Gomariz, M.; Antigüedad, I.; Santos, F.; Martínez-García, M.; Rosselló-Mora, R.; Antón, J. Ancient saltern metagenomics: Tracking changes in microbes and their viruses from the underground to the surface. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 3477–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Illumina Inc. Fungal Sequencing and Classification with the ITS Metagenomics Protocol. Available online: https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/its-metagenomics-app-note-1270-2018-001-web.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  26. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugan, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S.P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2639–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Abarenkov, K.; Zirk, A.; Piirmann, T.; Pöhönen, R.; Ivanov, F.; Nilsson, H.; Kõljalg, U. UNITE QIIME Release for Fungi; Version 10.05.2021; UNITE Community: Wales, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nguyen, N.H.; Song, Z.; Bates, S.T.; Branco, S.; Tedersoo, L.; Menke, J.; Schilling, J.S.; Kennedy, P.G. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bunbury-Blanchette, A.L.; Walker, A.K. Occurrence and distribution of fungi in saline environments. In Microorganisms in Saline Environments: Strategies and Functions. Soil Biology, 1st ed.; Giri, B., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 56, pp. 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  33. Grossart, H.-P.; Van den Wyngaert, S.; Kagami, M.; Wurzbacher, C.; Cunliffe, M.; Rojas-Jimenez, K. Fungi in aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 254–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bass, D.; Howe, A.; Brown, N.; Barton, H.; Demidova, M.; Michelle, H.; Li, L.; Sanders, H.; Watkinson, S.C.; Willcock, S. Yeast forms dominate fungal diversity in the deep oceans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017, 274, 3069–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhao, S.; Liu, J.J.; Banerjee, S.; White, J.F.; Zhou, N.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Zhang, K.; Hu, M.F.; Kingsley, K.; Tian, C.Y. Not by salinity alone: How environmental factors shape fungal communities in saline soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2019, 83, 1387–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, Y.; Wei, X.; Yang, S.; Gao, Y.H.; Luo, Z.H. Fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments from the Magellan seamounts as revealed by a metabarcoding approach targeting the ITS2 regions. Mycology 2020, 11, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, X.; Yu, L.; Xu, W.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wei, S.; Qiu, Y. Fungal diversity of deep-sea sediments in Mid-Oceanic Ridge area of the East Pacific and the South Indian Oceans. Botanica Marina 2020, 63, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Alsammar, H.; Delneri, D. An update on the diversity, ecology and biogeography of the Saccharomyces genus. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020, 20, foaa013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Blomberg, A. Metabolic surprises in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during adaptation to saline conditions: Questions, some answers and a model. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 182, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Naumov, G.I.; Naumova, E.S.; Martynenko, N.N.; Masneuf-Pomaréde, I. Taxonomy, ecology, and genetics of the yeast Saccharomyces bayanus: A new object for science and practice. Microbiology 2011, 80, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zalar, P.D.; De Hoog, G.S.; Schroers, H.J.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments. Stud. Micol. 2007, 58, 157–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zalar, P.; de Hood, G.S.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Trimmatostroma salinum, a new species from hypersaline water. Stud. Mycol. 1999, 43, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vicente, J.; Ruiz, J.; Belda, I.; Benito-Vázquez, I.; Marquina, D.; Calderón, F.; Santos, A.; Benito, S. The genus Metschnikowia in enology. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grangeteau, C.; Gerhards, D.; Rousseaux, S.; von Wallbrunn, C.; Alexandre, H.; Guilloux-Benatier, M. Diversity of yeast strains of the genus Hanseniaspora in the winery environment: What is their involvement in grape must fermentation? Food Microbiol. 2015, 50, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Windholtz, S.; Dutilh, L.; Lucas, M.; Maupeu, J.; Vallet-Courbin, A.; Farris, L.; Coulon, J.; Masneuf-Pomarède, I. Population dynamics and yeast diversity in early winemaking stages without sulfites revealed by three complementary approaches. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jančič, S.; Zalar, P.; Kocev, D.; Schroers, H.J.; Džeroski, S.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Halophily reloaded: New insights into the extremophilic life-style of Wallemia with the description of Wallemia hederae sp. nov. Fungal Divers. 2016, 76, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lambevska, A.; Rusevska, K.; Karadelev, M. New data on the taxonomy, distribution and ecology of the genus Peniophora Cooke (Basidiomycota, Fungi) in the Republic of Macedonia. Maced. J. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 15, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  48. Glushakova, A.M.; Kachalkin, A.V. Endophytic yeasts in Malus domestica and Pyrus communis fruits under anthropogenic impact. Microbiology 2017, 86, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. DeLong-Duhon, S.G.; Bagley, R.K. Phylogeny, morphology, and ecology resurrect previously synonymized species of North American Stereum. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vujanovic, V. Tremellomycetes yeasts in kernel ecological niche: Early indicators of enhanced competitiveness of endophytic and mycoparasitic symbionts against wheat pathobiota. Plants 2021, 10, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Baldrian, P.; Vetrovský, T.; Lepinay, C.; Kohout, P. High-throughput sequencing view on the magnitude of global fungal diversity. Fungal Divers. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lücking, R.; Aima, M.C.; Robbertse, B.; Miller, A.N.; Aoki, T.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Cardinali, G.; Crous, P.W.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Geiser, D.M.; et al. Fungal taxonomy and sequence-based nomenclature. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grossart, H.-P.; Wurzbacher, C.; James, T.Y.; Kagami, M. Discovery of dark matter fungi in aquatic ecosystems demands a reappraisal of the phylogeny and ecology of zoosporic fungi. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 19, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Amend, A.; Burgaud, G.; Cunliffe, M.; Edgcomb, V.P.; Ettinger, C.L.; Gutiérrez, M.H.; Heitman, J.; Hom, E.F.Y.; Ianiri, G.; Jones, A.C.; et al. Fungi in the marine environment: Open questions and unsolved problems. mBio 2019, 10, e01189-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Andermann, T.; Torres Jiménez, M.F.; Matos-Maraví, P.; Batista, R.; Blanco-Pastor, J.L.; Gustafsson, A.L.S.; Kistler, L.; Liberal, I.M.; Oxelman, B.; Bacon, C.D.; et al. A guide to carrying out a phylogenomic target sequence capture project. Front. Genet. 2020, 10, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Liu, D.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L. Soil pH determines fungal diversity along an elevation gradient in Southwestern China. Sci. China Life Sci. 2018, 61, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohamed, D.J.; Martiny, J.B. Patterns of fungal diversity and composition along a salinity gradient. ISME J. 2011, 5, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, S.; Lei, Y.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y. Patterns of yeast diversity distribution and its drivers in rhizosphere soil of Hami melon orchards in different regions of Xinjiang. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Taguiam, J.D.; Evallo, E.; Balendres, M.A. Epicoccum species: Ubiquitous plant pathogens and effective biological control agents. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 159, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zalar, P.; Kocuvan, M.A.; Plemenitas, A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Halophilic black yeast colonize wood immersed in hypersaline water. Botanica Marina 2005, 48, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Raghukumar, S. The marine environment and the role of fungi. In Fungi in Coastal and Oceanic Marine Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kirschner, R. Cercosporella and Ramularia. Mycologia 2009, 101, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Osman, M.E.; El-Shapy, A.A.E.; Meligry, D.A.; Ayid, M.M. Survey for fungal decaying archaeological wood and their enzymatic activity. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2014, 5, 295–308. [Google Scholar]
  64. Blancard, D. Diagnosis of parasitic and nonparasitic diseases. In Tomato Diseases, 2nd ed.; Blancard, D., Ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2013; pp. 35–411. [Google Scholar]
  65. Abdo, H.; Catacchio, C.R.; Ventura, M.; D’Addabbo, P.; Alexandre, H.; Guilloux-Bénatier, M.; Rousseaux, S. The establishment of a fungal consortium in a new winery. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 07 01074 g001 550
Figure 1. Locations along the Añana Salt Valley studied for fungal diversity and composition determination (photograph obtained from Visor geoEuskadi at https://www.geo.euskadi.eus/s69-bisorea/es/x72aGeoeuskadiWAR/index.jsp, accessed on 26 July 2021). The exact coordinates of each location are as follows: Pond I, 42.8014 N 2.9860 W; Pond II, 42.8009 N 2.9852 W; Pond III, 42.8006 N 2.9851 W; Pico Dulce, 42.7989 N 2.9858 W; Pico, 42.7986 N 2.9856 W; Santa Engracia, 42.7965 N 2.9863 W; S8 piezometer, 42.7970 N 2.9838 W.
Figure 1. Locations along the Añana Salt Valley studied for fungal diversity and composition determination (photograph obtained from Visor geoEuskadi at https://www.geo.euskadi.eus/s69-bisorea/es/x72aGeoeuskadiWAR/index.jsp, accessed on 26 July 2021). The exact coordinates of each location are as follows: Pond I, 42.8014 N 2.9860 W; Pond II, 42.8009 N 2.9852 W; Pond III, 42.8006 N 2.9851 W; Pico Dulce, 42.7989 N 2.9858 W; Pico, 42.7986 N 2.9856 W; Santa Engracia, 42.7965 N 2.9863 W; S8 piezometer, 42.7970 N 2.9838 W.
Jof 07 01074 g001
Jof 07 01074 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the (a) phylum and (b) genera detected at the different locations analyzed in the saltern. Genera detected at <3% in all sampling sites are classified as Others; (c) Venn plot showing the share and exclusive genera between salty water location and brackish water location groups. SE, Santa Engracia.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the (a) phylum and (b) genera detected at the different locations analyzed in the saltern. Genera detected at <3% in all sampling sites are classified as Others; (c) Venn plot showing the share and exclusive genera between salty water location and brackish water location groups. SE, Santa Engracia.
Jof 07 01074 g002
Jof 07 01074 g003 550
Figure 3. Heatmap showing the distribution of the most abundant genera along the sampling sites. The color represents the abundance of genera; the closer to red, the higher the abundance, and the closer to yellow, the lower the abundance. Clustering was performed based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. SE, Santa Engracia.
Figure 3. Heatmap showing the distribution of the most abundant genera along the sampling sites. The color represents the abundance of genera; the closer to red, the higher the abundance, and the closer to yellow, the lower the abundance. Clustering was performed based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. SE, Santa Engracia.
Jof 07 01074 g003
Jof 07 01074 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative abundance of the trophic modes and guilds detected at the sites analyzed. SE, Santa Engracia.
Figure 4. Relative abundance of the trophic modes and guilds detected at the sites analyzed. SE, Santa Engracia.
Jof 07 01074 g004
Table
Table 1. Alpha diversity indexes calculated for the locations of the saltern analyzed in the study.
Table 1. Alpha diversity indexes calculated for the locations of the saltern analyzed in the study.
Sample SiteObserved ASVsChao1ShannonSimpsonPielou’s Evenness
Santa Engracia Spring711163.590.770.58
Pico Spring3546336.270.950.74
Pond I2644525.440.930.67
Pond II3966996.470.940.75
Pond III2633376.070.940.75
Pico Dulce Spring2624306.150.960.76
S8 93934.890.910.74
ASVs, amplicon sequence variants.
Table
Table 2. Correlation between water physicochemical parameters and fungal diversity. The analysis was carried out using Pearson’s coefficient test.
Table 2. Correlation between water physicochemical parameters and fungal diversity. The analysis was carried out using Pearson’s coefficient test.
ParameterPearson’s Coefficient Test (p Values)
Shannon IndexSimpson Index
NaCl0.8960.732
Temperature0.3140.262
pH0.029 *0.015 *
* statistically significant correlation based on p-value (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azpiazu-Muniozguren, M.; Perez, A.; Rementeria, A.; Martinez-Malaxetxebarria, I.; Alonso, R.; Laorden, L.; Gamboa, J.; Bikandi, J.; Garaizar, J.; Martinez-Ballesteros, I. Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain). J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121074

AMA Style

Azpiazu-Muniozguren M, Perez A, Rementeria A, Martinez-Malaxetxebarria I, Alonso R, Laorden L, Gamboa J, Bikandi J, Garaizar J, Martinez-Ballesteros I. Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain). Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(12):1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azpiazu-Muniozguren, Maia, Alba Perez, Aitor Rementeria, Irati Martinez-Malaxetxebarria, Rodrigo Alonso, Lorena Laorden, Javier Gamboa, Joseba Bikandi, Javier Garaizar, and Ilargi Martinez-Ballesteros. 2021. "Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain)" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 12: 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121074

APA Style

Azpiazu-Muniozguren, M., Perez, A., Rementeria, A., Martinez-Malaxetxebarria, I., Alonso, R., Laorden, L., Gamboa, J., Bikandi, J., Garaizar, J., & Martinez-Ballesteros, I. (2021). Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain). Journal of Fungi, 7(12), 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop