Next Article in Journal
Ascophyllum nodosum Extract and Mycorrhizal Colonization Synergistically Trigger Immune Responses in Pea Plants against Rhizoctonia Root Rot, and Enhance Plant Growth and Productivity
Next Article in Special Issue
Invasive Fungal Infections 2021
Previous Article in Journal
AaHog1 Regulates Infective Structural Differentiation Mediated by Physicochemical Signals from Pear Fruit Cuticular Wax, Stress Response, and Alternaria alternata Pathogenicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Invasive Fungal Infections (IFIs) in India: A Prospective Observational Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 3
10.3390/jof8030267
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Fatal Breakthrough Candidemia in an Immunocompromised Patient in Kuwait Due to Candida auris Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Echinocandins and Carrying a Novel Mutation in Hotspot-1 of FKS1

by
Inaam Al-Obaid
1,
Mohammad Asadzadeh
2,
Suhail Ahmad
2,*,
Khaled Alobaid
3,
Wadha Alfouzan
2,
Ritu Bafna
1,
Maha Emara
1 and
Leena Joseph
2
1
Department of Microbiology, Al-Sabah Hospital, Shuwaikh 70031, Kuwait
2
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait
3
Department of Microbiology, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya 46300, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(3), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030267
Submission received: 14 February 2022 / Revised: 3 March 2022 / Accepted: 4 March 2022 / Published: 6 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasive Fungal Infections 2021)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida auris is an emerging yeast pathogen that has recently caused major outbreaks in healthcare facilities worldwide. Clinical C. auris isolates are usually resistant to fluconazole and readily develop resistance to echinocandins and amphotericin B (AMB) during treatment. We describe here an interesting case of C. auris infection in an immunocompromised patient who had previously received AMB and caspofungin treatment. Subsequently, C. auris was isolated from tracheal (tracheostomy) secretions and twice from urine and all three isolates were susceptible to AMB and micafungin. The patient received a combination therapy with AMB and caspofungin. Although the C. auris was cleared from the urine, the patient subsequently developed breakthrough candidemia and the bloodstream isolate exhibited a reduced susceptibility to micafungin and also showed the presence of a novel (S639T) mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1. Interestingly, C. auris from the tracheal (tracheostomy) secretions recovered one and four days later exhibited a reduced susceptibility to micafungin and S639Y and S639T mutations in hotspot-1 of FKS1, respectively. Although the treatment was changed to voriconazole, the patient expired. Our case highlights a novel FKS1 mutation and the problems clinicians are facing to treat invasive C. auris infections due to inherent or developing resistance to multiple antifungal drugs and limited antifungal armamentarium.

1. Background

The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is continuously increasing throughout the world due to an increasing population of immunocompromised patients, and IFIs are associated with high mortality rates [1,2]. Candida spp. are a common cause of IFIs and candidemia represents nearly 75% of all invasive Candida infections [3,4,5]; however, blood culture positivity for deep-seated candidiasis is usually less than 50%, suggesting that many cases are not detected by routine laboratory diagnostic methods [6,7,8]. Due to a lower culture positivity and non-specific signs and symptoms of the disease, patients with suspected invasive candidiasis are typically treated empirically with antifungal drugs [4,9]; however, patients receiving systemic antifungals also become susceptible to breakthrough infections with drug-resistant fungal pathogens [2,10]. Several reports have described breakthrough candidemia cases with drug-resistant/multidrug-resistant Candida among hospitalized patients receiving antifungal drugs as prophylaxis or empiric therapy, particularly among patients with hematological malignancies or other conditions compromising their immune defenses [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The epidemiology of invasive candidiasis has changed dramatically in the last two decades due to changes in clinical practice and the increasing use of fluconazole and other antifungal drugs for prophylaxis and/or treatment of at-risk patients, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) settings [9,19,20]. Since C. albicans is usually highly susceptible to antifungal drugs including fluconazole, this has led to the emergence of drug-resistant non-albicans Candida spp. as a significant cause of invasive candidiasis in many geographical locations [5,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Candida auris is a recently described, often multidrug-resistant, pathogenic yeast that has caused nosocomial invasive infections and outbreaks in more than 47 countries worldwide [28,29]. This novel yeast is easily transmitted among hospitalized patients as it colonizes the skin/nares, is shed into the environment contaminating hospital surfaces and equipment and can survive even under harsh conditions [28,29]. Like other Candida spp., invasive C. auris infections also occur more easily among colonized patients who are critically ill with prolonged hospitalization and have several comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus, respiratory disease or chronic kidney disease as well as indwelling catheters, mechanical ventilation and/or admission in the ICU [18,27,30,31,32,33,34,35]. A systematic review and meta-analysis have reported an over-all mortality rate of nearly 39% among C. auris-infected patients [36].
The aim of this study is to describe a fatal case of breakthrough C. auris candidemia in a lung transplant patient who was colonized with C. auris and was receiving combination therapy with AMB and caspofungin. We also discuss the role of different mutations which have been described so far in hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 of FKS1 and confer a reduced susceptibility to echinocandins in C. auris.

2. Case Report

The patient, a 32-year old bilateral lung transplant recipient in 2014 with type 1 diabetes mellitus, an inferior vena cava filter for previous deep venous thrombosis, chronic transplant rejection and respiratory failure, was admitted in the ICU of our hospital on 24 October 2017 (Day 1). On admission, she was severely hypotensive (70/30 mmHg), hypothermic (35.5 °C) and her Glasgow Coma Scale was 9/15. She was placed on mechanical ventilation, through tracheostomy (FIO2 was 50%), and was also on inotropes. Laboratory investigations revealed a peripheral leukocyte count of 7.4 × 109/L; serum creatinine, 54 µmol/L and C-reactive protein (CRP), 129.3 mg/L. She was treated empirically with meropenem (1 g q8h, 16 days), amikacin (500 mg q12h, 3 days), colistin nebulization (2MU q8h), teicoplanin (200 mg q12h, 10 days), ganciclovir (150 mg q12h, 9 days) and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) (200 mg q24h, 16 days) (Figure 1). Her cultures revealed no growth. One week later she improved clinically and noradrenaline was tapered down. On Day 20, she developed diarrhea with rectal bleeding and she was hypotensive. There was no peripheral leukocytosis, but the CRP was raised (711.5 mg/L). Blood and urine cultures were negative. The tracheostomy secretion yielded scanty growth of Candida krusei and caspofungin (70 mg loading dose and then 50 mg q24h) was given for seven days. A colonoscopy was performed and revealed colitis while a colon biopsy showed cytomegalovirus infection, hence, ganciclovir (150 mg q12h) was added, and she improved clinically.
On Day 48, the patient became hemodynamically unstable and was started on 0.1 µg/kg/min noradrenaline. She was afebrile and there was no peripheral leukocytosis, but the CRP was raised up to 252 mg/L. On Day 49, the blood culture grew coagulase-negative staphylococci and teicoplanin (200 mg q12h) was started. After an initial improvement, the patient deteriorated and required inotropic support. On Day 54, the urine culture yielded yeast growth (Isolate Kw3506/17) which was initially identified as C. haemulonii by Vitek2 but was later confirmed as C. auris by molecular methods. On Day 56, the tracheal (tracheostomy) aspirate also yielded C. auris (Isolate Kw3525/17) (Figure 1). The patient was started on a combination of L-AMB (300 mg q24h) and caspofungin (70 mg loading dose and then 50 mg q24h). The patient did not show much clinical improvement and on Day 62, C. auris (Isolate Kw3584/17) (Figure 1) was again cultured from urine but the growth was scanty. Fourteen days into the combination therapy with L-AMB and caspofungin, heavy growth of C. auris (Isolate Kw60/18) was obtained from the tracheal secretion on Day 70, but the urine culture did not yield C. auris. Two days later (Day 72), the patient developed candidemia as the blood drawn from the central line yielded C. auris (Isolate Kw87/18) (Figure 1). On Day 73, C. auris (Isolate Kw93/18) was isolated again from the tracheal (tracheostomy) aspirate. Following the identification of bloodstream yeast isolate as C. auris, the combination therapy with L-AMB and caspofungin was stopped and the patient was started on voriconazole. On Day 76, the tracheal (tracheostomy) aspirate again yielded C. auris (Isolate Kw108/18) and three days later (Day 79), the patient expired (Figure 1).

Isolation, Molecular Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

The clinical samples were processed according to standard laboratory procedures described previously [37]. The blood specimens were processed by an automated BACTEC 9240 system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) and yeast isolates were provisionally identified by the Vitek2 yeast identification system (bioMerieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France) as described previously [38]. The isolates were sent to the Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) for molecular identification and antifungal drug susceptibility testing. Genomic DNA was prepared from each isolate by the rapid boiling method [39]. Species-specific identification was achieved by PCR amplification of the rDNA by using C. auris-specific primers and by PCR amplification of the rDNA followed by DNA sequencing using pan-fungal primers, as described previously [37,40]. In vitro susceptibility to antifungal drugs was obtained against eight (fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, micafungin, amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine) antifungal drugs by the commercial MICRONAUT-AM antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) panel for yeasts (Merlin Diagnostica GmbH, Bornheim, Germany). The procedure was performed by following the instructions supplied with the kit and as described previously [34]. Reference strains of Candida krusei (ATCC 6258) and Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were processed simultaneously during the AST to ensure quality control. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined after 24 h of incubation at 35 °C as described previously [34]. Since there are no C. auris-specific susceptibility breakpoints, tentative breakpoints of ≥32 µg/mL for the fluconazole, ≥2 µg/mL for voriconazole, ≥2 µg/mL for itraconazole, ≥2 µg/mL for posaconazole, ≥4 µg/mL for anidulafungin, ≥4 µg/mL for micafungin and ≥2 µg/mL for the amphotericin B, as proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the USA and expert opinion were used [41,42,43,44].
Fluconazole resistance-conferring mutations in ERG11 were detected by PCR-sequencing, as described previously [45]. The mutations conferring resistance to micafungin in C. auris strains are usually located in the hotspot-1 or hotspot-2 regions of the FKS1 gene [18,28,46]. Mutations in the hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 regions of FKS1 were detected by PCR-sequencing, as described previously [18,45].
A total of seven C. auris were isolated from different clinical specimens during the 23 day (16 December 2017 to 7 January 2018) period. All the isolates were identified as C. auris by species-specific PCR amplification, and their ITS region of rDNA sequences were identical and showed 100% identity with C. auris strains isolated previously from Kuwait and India. The AST data showed that all seven isolates were uniformly resistant to fluconazole but appeared susceptible to other triazoles (Table 1). Sequence analyses of the hotspot region of ERG11 identified a fluconazole resistance-conferring K143R mutation in all seven isolates (Table 1). All seven isolates appeared susceptible to AMB and 5-flucytosine; however, their susceptibility to echinocandins varied. While the two urine isolates and the first two isolates from the tracheal (tracheostomy) secretions were susceptible to micafungin (and anidulafungin), the bloodstream and the two subsequent isolates from tracheal (tracheostomy) secretions showed a reduced susceptibility to micafungin (and anidulafungin) (Table 1). Consistent with the AST data for the two echinocandins, the two (Kw3506/17 and Kw3584/17) urine isolates and the first two (Kw3525/17 and Kw60/18) isolates from tracheal secretions contained a wild-type sequence of hotspot-1 of FKS1; however, the bloodstream isolate (Kw87/18) showing a reduced susceptibility to micafungin (MIC 0.125 µg/mL), contained a S639T mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1. Surprisingly, the C. auris (Kw93/18) isolated from tracheal secretions one day later and exhibiting a reduced susceptibility to micafungin (MIC 1 µg/mL), contained a S639Y mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1; however, another C. auris (Kw108/18) isolated subsequently from the tracheal secretions and exhibiting a reduced susceptibility to micafungin (MI 0.125 µg/mL) contained a S639T mutation in the hotspot-1 of FKS1. All three latter isolates contained a wild-type sequence of the hotspot-2 region of FKS1 (Table 1).

3. Comments

The emergence of breakthrough IFIs, particularly due to drug-resistant strains of Candida and other yeast species, is now regarded as a significant threat to immunocompromised patients in ICU settings receiving systemic antifungal drugs as prophylaxis [2,10,30]. In this study, we described a fatal case of breakthrough candidemia due to C. auris in an immunocompromised patient who had previously received more than one course of antifungal prophylaxis or empiric treatment. The patient was colonized initially with C. auris in the urinary tract and subsequently also in the respiratory tract. Interestingly, infection from the urinary tract was successfully cleared due to combination therapy with liposomal AMB and caspofungin. Candiduria due to C. auris was also successfully eradicated by therapy with liposomal AMB in another recent study in an immunocompromised patient [18]. Since AMB is excreted through the kidneys, these findings suggest that treatment with AMB is an attractive alternative to clear urinary tract infection due to C. auris in hospitalized patients.
Despite clearance of the C. auris infection from the urinary tract, breakthrough candidemia due to C. auris developed while the patient was still receiving combination therapy with liposomal AMB and caspofungin. The bloodstream isolate was resistant to the fluconazole but exhibited a reduced susceptibility (MIC 0.125 µg/mL) to micafungin while the four colonizing strains obtained previously were resistant to fluconazole but were highly susceptible (MIC 0.016 µg/mL) to micafungin. Furthermore, unlike the four colonizing strains which contained the wild-type sequence, the bloodstream isolate displayed a novel mutation (S639T) in hotspot-1 of FKS1 which has not been described previously among echinocandin-resistant C. auris [18,34,43,45,46,47,48]. Although the C. auris isolate recovered from the tracheal aspirate one day later also exhibited a reduced susceptibility (MIC 1 µg/mL) to micafungin, it contained an S639Y mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1 while another C. auris isolate from the tracheal aspirate recovered three days later was similar to the bloodstream isolate in terms of both susceptibility to micafungin (MIC 0.125 µg/mL) and the FKS1 sequence (S639T mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1). All seven C. auris isolates contained an identical ITS region of rDNA sequences and the fluconazole resistance-conferring K143R mutation in ERG11; however, it could not be ascertained whether they were clonally related as detailed high-resolution fingerprinting by short tandem repeat typing or by whole genome sequencing was not carried out.
It is reasonable to assume that the reduced susceptibility to echinocandins first developed in the C. auris colonizing the tracheal region of the respiratory tract in our patient which subsequently translocated to the bloodstream, as was also shown in a case of breakthrough candidemia in a recent study by Asadzadeh et al. [18]. C. auris exhibiting a reduced susceptibility to echinocandins and carrying a novel (R1354H) mutation in hotspot-2 of FKS1, was isolated from the bloodstream of an immunocompromised patient who was also colonized in the respiratory tract with this yeast carrying the same rare mutation in hotspot-2 of FKS1 [18]. The isolation of C. auris, however, with a reduced susceptibility to micafungin and carrying the S639Y mutation from a tracheal (tracheostomy) secretion before the isolation of another isolate carrying the S639T mutation—similar to the bloodstream isolate—is intriguing but could be explained as follows. Since the C. auris from the bloodstream and other anatomic sites were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar and single colonies were selected for further studies and the storage of cultures, it is probable that both C. auris with S639Y and with S639T mutations evolved simultaneously from echinocandin-susceptible C. auris in the tracheal region of the respiratory tract, but only the isolate with the S639Y mutation was detected by chance in the culture grown on 4 January 2018. Meanwhile, the C. auris with the S639Y mutation was cleared, likely due to its reduced fitness while the C. auris with the S639T mutation proliferated as it probably had little, if any, fitness issue. This is similar to the development of drug resistance in another pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The resistance of M. tuberculosis to isoniazid is caused mainly by mutations in the katG gene and a S315T mutation in katG causes high-level resistance to isoniazid and minimal effect on fitness, which eventually leads to multidrug resistance when the M. tuberculosis additionally develops a resistance to rifampicin [49,50]. Although other (S315N, S315I, S315R and S315G) mutations have also been described in a minority of isoniazid-resistant M. tuberculosis strains, isolates with the S315Y mutation have not been detected so far [51].
The present case also shows that the MIC of the C auris isolate to echinocandins is not a good predictor of outcome as the patient developed breakthrough candidemia due to the C. auris while on therapy with caspofungin, even though the isolate showed only a moderate increase in the MIC value for micafungin and the patient died soon after the diagnosis of an invasive infection. A similar fatal outcome was also recently reported in a patient who experienced breakthrough candidemia with C. auris [18]. In their study, the patient experienced breakthrough candidemia while on therapy with caspofungin even though the MIC of the C. auris isolate for micafungin and carrying a R1354H mutation in FKS1 was only 0.125 µg/mL [18]. Another recent study has also concluded that the FKS1 genotype rather than the MIC of the C. auris for echinocandins is a more accurate predictor of an in vivo response to treatment in the mouse model of disseminated infection [46].
Mutations in the hotspot-1 and hotpot-2 regions of FKS1 usually confer a reduced susceptibility to echinocandins in C. auris [18,43,45,46,48,51,52,53]. Until recently, only a few non-synonymous mutations at codon 639 within the hotspot-1 of FKS1 were described among echinocandin-resistant clinical C. auris isolates in different studies; however, more recently, several novel mutations have been described not only at other codon positions within hotspot-1 but also in hotspot-2 of FKS1 and are summarized in Table 2. Three codon positions (F635, S639 and D642) within hotspot-1 and a single codon position (R1354) within hotspot-2 of FKS1 were mutated in the C. auris isolates exhibiting a reduced susceptibility to echinocandins. It is also apparent from the data reported in Table 2 that the C. auris strains with an identical FKS1 mutation exhibited variable susceptibility to echinocandins (as illustrated by the differences in their MIC values) likely due to differences in their genetic background, as global C. auris strains belong to one of five Clades which differ in thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms and exhibit considerable differences in their intrinsic susceptibility to antifungal drugs [44,54]. Additionally, many of the C. auris strains described in various studies may have been isolated from immunocompromised patients who had likely been previously exposed to antifungal drugs on multiple occasions as a prophylaxis or empiric treatment and, therefore, may have accumulated mutations in other genes that alter permeability barriers resulting in differences in susceptibility to different antifungal drugs [18,53,55,56]. Another interesting point that has been highlighted recently is the variable in vivo response to treatment with antifungal drugs among C. auris strains carrying different mutations in hotspot-1 or hotspot-2 of FKS1 [46]. These findings strongly suggest that C. auris with different FKS1 mutations may also differ with respect to their survival in the hostile environment within the human host, i.e., they exhibit variable fitness defects.

4. Conclusions

We presented a unique case of fatal breakthrough candidemia due to C. auris in an immunocompromised patient while receiving combination therapy with liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin. The C. auris from the bloodstream as well as from tracheal secretions exhibited a reduced susceptibility to micafungin and showed the presence of a novel (S639T) mutation in hotspot-1 of the FKS1 gene which has not been described previously. It is proposed that among all non-synonymous mutations detected so far at codon S639 within the hotspot-1 of FKS1, isolates with a S639T mutation may be least affected by the fitness cost imposed by the genetic alteration.
The DNA sequencing data reported in this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession no. LR595917, LR595922, OM530137 to OM530141 and OM649832 to OM649843.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed towards production of this manuscript: Data curation, I.A.-O., M.A., S.A., K.A., W.A., R.B. and M.E.; formal analysis, I.A.-O., M.A., S.A. and K.A.; investigation: I.A.-O., M.A., S.A., W.A. and L.J.; methodology, M.A., S.A., W.A. and L.J.; project administration, I.A.-O., S.A. and K.A.; supervision, I.A.-O., S.A. and K.A.; writing—original draft, I.A.-O., M.A., S.A., K.A.,W.A., R.B., M.E. and L.J.; writing—review and editing, I.A.-O., M.A., S.A., K.A.,W.A., R.B., M.E. and L.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Kuwait (approval no. VDR/EC/3724 dated 31 January 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

The need for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Kuwait as the results are reported on deidentified samples without revealing patient identity.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available in the published article; the datasets are available with the corresponding author and can be provided upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Friedman, D.Z.P.; Schwartz, I.S. Emerging fungal infections: New patients, new patterns, and new pathogens. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jenks, J.D.; Cornely, O.A.; Chen, S.C.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Hoenigl, M. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections: Who is at risk? Mycoses 2020, 63, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McCarty, T.P.; Pappas, P.G. Invasive candidiasis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lamoth, F.; Lockhart, S.R.; Berkow, E.L.; Calandra, T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, i4–i13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Invasive candidiasis: A review of nonculture-based laboratory diagnostic methods. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 30, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, M.H.; Wissel, M.C.; Shields, R.K.; Salomoni, M.A.; Hao, B.; Press, E.G.; Shields, R.M.; Cheng, S.; Mitsani, D.; Vadnerkar, A.; et al. Performance of Candida real-time polymerase chain reaction, β-D-glucan assay, and blood cultures in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Clancy, C.J.; Nguyen, M.H. Diagnosing invasive candidiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01909–e01917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ben-Ami, R. Treatment of invasive candidiasis: A narrative review. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cornely, O.A.; Hoenigl, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Chen, S.C.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Morrissey, C.O.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd. Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSG-ERC) and the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Defining breakthrough invasive fungal infection-Position paper of the mycoses study group education and research consortium and the European Confederation of Medical Mycology. Mycoses 2019, 62, 716–729. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saraya, T.; Tanabe, K.; Araki, K.; Yonetani, S.; Makino, H.; Watanabe, T.; Tsujimoto, N.; Takata, S.; Kurai, D.; Ishii, H.; et al. Breakthrough invasive Candida glabrata in patients on micafungin: A novel FKS gene conversion correlated with sequential elevation of MIC. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2709–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kimura, M.; Araoka, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Nakamura, S.; Nagi, M.; Yamagoe, S.; Miyazaki, Y.; Ogura, S.; Mitsuki, T.; Yuasa, M.; et al. Micafungin breakthrough fungemia in patients with hematological disorders. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02183-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Mokaddas, E.; Meis, J.F.; Joseph, L.; Abdullah, A.; Vayalil, S. Development of echinocandin resistance in Candida tropicalis following short-term exposure to caspofungin for empiric therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01926-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sfeir, M.M.; Jiménez-Ortigosa, C.; Gamaletsou, M.N.; Schuetz, A.N.; Soave, R.; Van Besien, K.; Small, C.B.; Perlin, D.S.; Walsh, T.J. Breakthrough bloodstream infections caused by echinocandin-resistant Candida tropicalis: An emerging threat to immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Arensman, K.; Miller, J.L.; Chiang, A.; Mai, N.; Levato, J.; LaChance, E.; Anderson, M.; Beganovic, M.; Dela Pena, J. Clinical outcomes of patients treated for Candida auris infections in a multisite health system, Illinois, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.C.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.P. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of breakthrough candidemia in 71 hematologic malignancy patients and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A single-center retrospective study from China, 2011–2018. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, S394–S399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Posteraro, B.; De Carolis, E.; Criscuolo, M.; Ballanti, S.; De Angelis, G.; Del Principe, M.I.; Delia, M.; Fracchiolla, N.; Marchesi, F.; Nadali, G.; et al. Candidaemia in haematological malignancy patients from a SEIFEM study: Epidemiological patterns according to antifungal prophylaxis. Mycoses 2020, 63, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asadzadeh, M.; Mokaddas, E.; Ahmad, S.; Abdullah, A.A.; de Groot, T.; Meis, J.F.; Shetty, S.A. Molecular characterisation of Candida auris isolates from immunocompromised patients in a tertiary-care hospital in Kuwait reveals a novel mutation in FKS1 conferring reduced susceptibility to echinocandins. Mycoses 2022, 65, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyon, S. Antifungal prophylaxis: Why, what and how? Future Microbiol. 2016, 11, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kullberg, B.J.; Arendrup, M.C. Invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Khan, Z.U.; Al-Sweih, N.A.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Kazemi, N.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L.; Chandy, R. Outbreak of fungemia among neonates caused by Candida haemulonii resistant to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2025–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; Castanheira, M.; Jones, R.N. Twenty Years of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program: Results for Candida Species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L. Candida lusitaniae in Kuwait: Prevalence, antifungal susceptibility and role in neonatal fungemia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mathur, P.; Hasan, F.; Singh, P.K.; Malhotra, R.; Walia, K.; Chowdhary, A. Five-year profile of candidaemia at an Indian trauma centre: High rates of Candida auris blood stream infections. Mycoses 2018, 61, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Van Schalkwyk, E.; Mpembe, R.S.; Thomas, J.; Shuping, L.; Ismail, H.; Lowman, W.; Karstaedt, A.S.; Chibabhai, V.; Wadula, J.; Avenant, T.; et al. Epidemiologic shift in candidemia driven by Candida auris, South Africa, 2016–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1698–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Al-Sweih, N.; Alfouzan, W.; Joseph, L.; Asadzadeh, M. Candida kefyr in Kuwait: Prevalence, antifungal drug susceptibility and genotypic heterogeneity. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240426. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shastri, P.S.; Shankarnarayan, S.A.; Oberoi, J.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Wattal, C.; Chakrabarti, A. Candida auris candidaemia in an intensive care unit-Prospective observational study to evaluate epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome. J. Crit. Care 2020, 57, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmad, S.; Alfouzan, W. Candida auris: Epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, antifungal susceptibility and infection control measures to combat the spread of infections in healthcare facilities. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection Prevention and Control for Candida auris. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-infection-control.html (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  30. Bassetti, M.; Scudeller, L.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Lamoth, F.; Righi, E.; Zuccaro, V.; Grecchi, C.; Rebuffi, C.; Akova, M.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; et al. Developing Definitions for Invasive Fungal Diseases in Critically Ill Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units. Protocol of the FUNgal Infections Definitions in ICU Patients (FUNDICU) Project. Mycoses 2019, 62, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taori, S.K.; Khonyongwa, K.; Hayden, I.; Athukorala, G.D.A.; Letters, A.; Fife, A.; Desai, N.; Borman, A.M. Candida auris outbreak: Mortality, interventions and cost of sustaining control. J. Infect. 2019, 79, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruiz-Gaitán, A.; Martínez, H.; Moret, A.M.; Calabuig, E.; Tasias, M.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Zaragoza, Ó.; Mollar, J.; Frasquet, J.; Salavert-Lletí, M.; et al. Detection and treatment of Candida auris in an outbreak situation: Risk factors for developing colonization and candidemia by this new species in critically ill patients. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2019, 17, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yadav, A.; Singh, A.; Wang, Y.; van Haren, M.H.; Singh, A.; de Groot, T.; Meis, J.F.; Xu, J.; Chowdhary, A. Colonisation and Transmission Dynamics of Candida auris among Chronic Respiratory Diseases Patients Hospitalised in a Chest Hospital, Delhi, India: A Comparative Analysis of Whole Genome Sequencing and Microsatellite Typing. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alfouzan, W.; Ahmad, S.; Dhar, R.; Asadzadeh, M.; Almerdasi, N.; Abdo, N.M.; Joseph, L.; de Groot, T.; Alali, W.Q.; Khan, Z.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Candida auris outbreak in a major secondary-care hospital in Kuwait. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mulet Bayona, J.V.; Tormo Palop, N.; Salvador García, C.; Herrero Rodríguez, P.; Abril López de Medrano, V. Ferrer Gómez, C.; Gimeno Cardona, C. Characteristics and management of candidaemia episodes in an established Candida auris outbreak. Antibiotics 2020, 9, E558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, J.; Tian, S.; Han, X.; Chu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, B.; Shang, H. Is the superbug fungus really so scary? A systematic review and meta-analysis of global epidemiology and mortality of Candida auris. BMC Infect Dis. 2020, 20, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, Z.U.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Joseph, L.; Alfouzan, F.; Asadzadeh, M. Increasing prevalence, molecular characterization and antifungal drug susceptibility of serial Candida auris isolates in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Mokaddas, E.; Al-Banwan, K.; Alfouzan, W.; Al-Obaid, I.; Al-Obaid, K.; Asadzadeh, M.; Jeragh, A.; et al. Changing trends in epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of six bloodstream Candida species isolates over a 12-year period in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, Z. Simple, low-cost detection of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates and molecular fingerprinting of Candida orthopsilosis strains in Kuwait by ITS region sequencing and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Khan, Z.U.; Ahmad, S.; Hagen, F.; Fell, J.W.; Kowshik, T.; Chandy, R.; Boekhout, T. Cryptococcus randhawai sp. nov., a novel anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast isolated from tree trunk hollow of Ficus religiosa (peepal tree) from New Delhi, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010, 97, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing and Interpretation. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html (accessed on 12 January 2022).
  42. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms and Treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chowdhary, A.; Prakash, A.; Sharma, C.; Kordalewska, M.; Kumar, A.; Sarma, S.; Tarai, B.; Singh, A.; Upadhyaya, G.; Upadhyay, S.; et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009–2017) in India: Role of ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lockhart, S.R.; Etienne, K.A.; Vallabhaneni, S.; Farooqi, J.; Chowdhary, A.; Govender, N.P.; Colombo, A.; Calvo, B.; Cuomo, C.A.; Desjardins, C.A.; et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Al-Sweih, N.; Alfouzan, W.; Joseph, L. Candida auris in various hospitals across Kuwait and their susceptibility and molecular basis of resistance to antifungal drugs. Mycoses 2020, 63, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sharma, D.; Paul, R.A.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Kashyap, N.; Bhattacharya, S.; Soman, R.; Shankarnarayan, S.A.; Chavan, D.; Singh, S.; Das, P.; et al. Impact of FKS1 genotype on echinocandin in-vitro susceptibility in Candida auris and in vivo response in a murine model of infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 66, e01652-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R. Activity of CD101, a long-acting echinocandin, against clinical isolates of Candida auris. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 90, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kordalewska, M.; Lee, A.; Park, S.; Berrio, I.; Chowdhary, A.; Zhao, Y.; Perlin, D.S. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00238-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gagneux, S.; Long, C.D.; Small, P.M.; Van, T.; Schoolnik, G.K.; Bohannan, B.J. The competitive cost of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2006, 312, 1944–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ahmad, S.; Mokaddas, E. Current status and future trends in the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J. Infect. Pub. Health 2014, 7, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Seifert, M.; Catanzaro, D.; Catanzaro, A.; Rodwell, T.C. Genetic mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Rhodes, J.; Abdolrasouli, A.; Farrer, R.A.; Cuomo, C.A.; Aanensen, D.M.; Armstrong-James, D.; Fisher, M.C.; Schelenz, S. Genomic epidemiology of the UK outbreak of the emerging human fungal pathogen Candida auris. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rybak, J.M.; Barker, K.; Munoz, J.F.; Parker, J.E.; Ahmad, S.; Mokaddas, E.; Abdullah, A.; Elhagracy, R.; Cuomo, C.A.; Kelly, S.L.; et al. In vivo emergence of high-level resistance during treatment reveals the first identified mechanism of amphotericin B resistance in Candida auris. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chow, N.A.; de Groot, T.; Badali, H.; Abastabar, M.; Chiller, T.M.; Meis, J.F. Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1780–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ahmad, S.; Joseph, L.; Parker, J.E.; Asadzadeh, M.; Kelly, S.L.; Meis, J.F.; Khan, Z. ERG6 and ERG2 are major targets conferring reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B in clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Kuwait. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01900–e01918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Rybak, J.M.; Muñoz, J.F.; Barker, K.S.; Parker, J.E.; Esquivel, B.D.; Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R.; Gade, L.; Palmer, G.E.; White, T.C.; et al. Mutations in TAC1B: A novel genetic determinant of clinical fluconazole resistance in Candida auris. mBio 2020, 11, e00365-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 08 00267 g001 550
Figure 1. Time-line for the isolation of C. auris, antifungal treatment given to the patient and outcome. L-AMB, liposomal amphotericin B; CAS, caspofungin; MFG, micafungin; VOR, voriconazole; TS, tracheal secretion; FKS1 HS-1, hotspot-1 region of FKS1 gene; WT, wild-type.
Figure 1. Time-line for the isolation of C. auris, antifungal treatment given to the patient and outcome. L-AMB, liposomal amphotericin B; CAS, caspofungin; MFG, micafungin; VOR, voriconazole; TS, tracheal secretion; FKS1 HS-1, hotspot-1 region of FKS1 gene; WT, wild-type.
Jof 08 00267 g001
Table
Table 1. In vitro susceptibility data for C. auris isolates against eight antifungal drugs and mutation patterns in ERG11 and FKS1.
Table 1. In vitro susceptibility data for C. auris isolates against eight antifungal drugs and mutation patterns in ERG11 and FKS1.
IsolateClinicalMinimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
Values (µg/mL) For		FKS1 SequenceERG11
No.SourceFLUVORITRPOSAFGMFGAMBHS-1HS-2Sequence
KW3506/17Urine≥1280.250.50.0630.0310.0161WTWTK143R
KW3525/17TS≥1280.250.50.0310.0310.0161WTWTK143R
KW3584/17Urine≥1280.2510.0630.0630.0161WTWTK143R
KW60/18TS≥1280.50.50.0310.0630.0161WTWTK143R
KW87/18Blood≥1280.50.50.0630.250.1251S639TWTK143R
KW93/18TS≥1280.50.50.031111S639YWTK143R
KW108/18TS≥1280.50.50.0630.250.1251S639TWTK143R
TS, tracheal secretion; FLU, fluconazole; VOR, voriconazole; ITR, itraconazole; POS, posaconazole; AFG, anidulafungin; MFG, micafungin; AMB, amphotericin B; HS-1, hotspot-1; HS-2, hotspot-2.
Table
Table 2. Non-synonymous or deletion mutations detected in hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 of FKS1 in C. auris reported in different studies.
Table 2. Non-synonymous or deletion mutations detected in hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 of FKS1 in C. auris reported in different studies.
FKS1
Hotspot Region		Codon Positions
and Sequence		Specific
Mutation		Micafungin MIC
Range (µg/mL)		Main
Reference(s)
Hotspot-1635-FLTLSLRDP-643ΔF6350.5[34]
F635L1[46]
F635Y4 to 16[46]
S639F2 to 16[18,43,45,46,48]
S639Y1 to 8[51], This study
S639P1 to 8[52]
S639T0.125This study
D642Y0.063[18,53]
Hotspot-21350-DWIRRYTL-1357R1354S16[46]
R1354H0.125[18]
Codon positions frequently mutated in hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 of FKS1 in the echinocandin-resistant C. auris are shown in bold and underlined letters.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Obaid, I.; Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Alobaid, K.; Alfouzan, W.; Bafna, R.; Emara, M.; Joseph, L. Fatal Breakthrough Candidemia in an Immunocompromised Patient in Kuwait Due to Candida auris Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Echinocandins and Carrying a Novel Mutation in Hotspot-1 of FKS1. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030267

AMA Style

Al-Obaid I, Asadzadeh M, Ahmad S, Alobaid K, Alfouzan W, Bafna R, Emara M, Joseph L. Fatal Breakthrough Candidemia in an Immunocompromised Patient in Kuwait Due to Candida auris Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Echinocandins and Carrying a Novel Mutation in Hotspot-1 of FKS1. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(3):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Obaid, Inaam, Mohammad Asadzadeh, Suhail Ahmad, Khaled Alobaid, Wadha Alfouzan, Ritu Bafna, Maha Emara, and Leena Joseph. 2022. "Fatal Breakthrough Candidemia in an Immunocompromised Patient in Kuwait Due to Candida auris Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Echinocandins and Carrying a Novel Mutation in Hotspot-1 of FKS1" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 3: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030267

APA Style

Al-Obaid, I., Asadzadeh, M., Ahmad, S., Alobaid, K., Alfouzan, W., Bafna, R., Emara, M., & Joseph, L. (2022). Fatal Breakthrough Candidemia in an Immunocompromised Patient in Kuwait Due to Candida auris Exhibiting Reduced Susceptibility to Echinocandins and Carrying a Novel Mutation in Hotspot-1 of FKS1. Journal of Fungi, 8(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop