Next Article in Journal
Onychomycosis Caused by Fusarium Species
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Evolutionary Engineering Approach to Alter Substrate Specificity of Disaccharide Transporter Mal11 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/jof8040359
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phylogenetic Comparison of Swainsonine Biosynthetic Gene Clusters among Fungi

by
Marwa Neyaz
1,
Sumanjari Das
2,
Daniel Cook
3 and
Rebecca Creamer
4,*
1
Plant and Environmental Science Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
2
Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
3
Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Logan, UT 84341, USA
4
Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(4), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040359
Submission received: 4 March 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Genomics, Genetics and Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Swainsonine is a cytotoxic alkaloid produced by fungi. Genome sequence analyses revealed that these fungi share an orthologous gene cluster, SWN, necessary for swainsonine biosynthesis. To investigate the SWN cluster, the gene sequences and intergenic regions were assessed in organisms containing swnK, which is conserved across all fungi that produce swainsonine. The orders of fungi which contained orthologous swainsonine genes included Pleosporales, Onygenales, Hypocreales, Chaetothyriales, Xylariales, Capnodiales, Microthyriales, Caliciales, Patellariales, Eurotiales, and a species of the Leotiomycetes. SwnK and swnH2 genes were conserved across all fungi containing the SWN cluster; in contrast, swnT and swnA were found in a limited number of fungi containing the SWN cluster. The phylogenetic data suggest that in some orders that the SWN cluster was gained once from a common ancestor while in other orders it was likely gained several times from one or more common ancestors. The data also show that rearrangements and inversions of the SWN cluster happened within a genus as species diverged. Analysis of the intergenic regions revealed different combinations and inversions of open reading frames, as well as absence of genes. These results provide evidence of a complex evolutionary history of the SWN cluster in fungi.

1. Introduction

Secondary metabolites are organic molecules produced by plants, bacteria, and fungi and are critical for virulence, defense, and communication. The secondary metabolite swainsonine is a toxic indolizidine alkaloid that inhibits α-mannosidase and disrupts the endomembrane system of the animal cells causing a lysosomal storage disease and inhibiting mannosidase II in the Golgi apparatus altering glycoprotein synthesis [1,2,3]. Swainsonine was first isolated from the plant Swainsona canescens (Fabaceae) in Australia [4] and subsequently other plant genera within the Convolvulaceae, Fabaceae, and Malvaceae [5].
Research has demonstrated that all swainsonine-containing plants investigated to date host fungal symbionts responsible for the production of swainsonine [5,6,7,8,9]. Other fungi that produce swainsonine are pathogens of insects, mammals, or plants [10,11,12]. Within plants, the seed-transmitted fungal symbiont Alternaria section Undifilum (Pleosporales) was identified in the locoweeds Astragalus and Oxytropis (Fabaceae) [8,13,14]. Continued consumption of these plants by grazing animals causes the neurological disease, “locoism”, characterized by weight loss, lack of muscular coordination, altered behavior, depression, infertility, abortion, birth defects, heart congestive failure, and eventually death [15,16]. Another seed transmitted fungal symbiont belonging to order Chaetothyriales was reported in Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae) as a swainsonine producer [7]. Swainsonine is also produced by the plant pathogen Slafractonia leguminicola [10,17], the insect pathogen Metarhizium spp. [11,12,18], and in dermatophytes of the Arthrodermataceae [12].
To understand the evolution of the swainsonine toxin, the swainsonine gene cluster was partially characterized in four orders of fungi: Hypocreales, Chaetothyriales, Onygenales, Pleosporales, and in an undefined order that is part of the class Leotiomycetes [12]. The cluster consists of seven genes that encode functional proteins: a hybrid nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) polyketide synthase (PKS) swnK, swnH1 and swnH2 encoding dioxygenases, swnR and swnN encoding reductases, swnT encoding a transmembrane transporter, and swnA which encodes an aromatic amino transferase. SwnK, the largest gene in the cluster, encodes a multifunctional protein consisted of five domains (A, T, KS, AT, and SDR). Inactivation of swnK in Metarhizium robertsii resulted in no detectable swainsonine, demonstrating that this gene is required for synthesis of the toxin [12,19].
Several studies have further characterized the swainsonine gene cluster. The KS domain amongst Alternaria swainsonine-producing fungi was compared and phylogenetic results indicated that swnK-KS sequences differed slightly between plant pathogen and non-pathogens but was highly conserved among all swainsonine-producing Alternaria spp. [20]. Similarly, Creamer et al. [21] illustrated high conservation for 15 of 22 of the PKS, NRPS, and PKS/NRPS genes in the genus Alternaria and order Pleosporales through phylogenetic analyses.
Many NRPSs and PKSs (highly reducing PKS, partially reducing PKS, and non-reducing PKS) and hybrid PKS/NRPS have been identified in fungi [22] and have been implicated in the biosynthesis of different secondary metabolites [23] including toxins. NRPS and PKSs are key components of toxin pathways for fungi including HC-toxin from the mazie pathogen Cochliobolus carbonum, and AM-toxin from the apple pathogen Alternaria alternata [24]. NRPSs are important for antibiotic production, such as penicillin produced by Penicillium and Aspergillus spp., and the immune suppressive cyclosporine produced by Tolypocladium inflatum [25]. The diverse roles and species acquisition of these genes reflect a complicated evolutionary history.
Fungal secondary metabolites may be highly divergent [26]. Recombination, gene gain, whole cluster gain and loss, duplications, domain shuffling, neofunctionalization, and subfunctionalization events of secondary metabolites have been reported, as has horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [27]. Interestingly, Lawrence et al., (2011) [28] suggested that an interkingdom gene transfer of a hybrid NPS/PKS from bacteria to Ascomycota had occurred, suggesting a possible bacterial ontogeny. Notably, swnK represents one of the hybrid NPS/PKS evolutionary outcomes of this interkingdom gene transfer [12].
The evolution of the swainsonine gene cluster, how it was derived, spread, and diversified is unknown. Herein, we evaluate the evolutionary history of the swainsonine genes cluster through BLAST analyses and a comparative phylogenetic framework. We searched for orthologues of the seven swainsonine genes in diverse fungi, assessed the relationship amongst these fungi, and analyzed the intergenic regions of all seven genes, for this work. Our study provides evidence of a complex evolutionary history of the SWN cluster in fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

Protein sequences of SWN gene clusters (SwnA-EXU97977, SwnH1-EXU97978, SwnH2-EXU97983, SwnK-EXU97982, SwnN-EXU97980, SwnR-EXU97981, and SwnT-EXU97979) of the fungus Metarhizium robertsii order Hypocreales were obtained from NCBI as reference sequences. Homology of each SWN protein component was compared using the pblast program of NCBI. SwnK was used as the reference gene to initiate all analyses. Protein sequences for SwnK were identified first; all 36 organisms that contained SwnK were used for subsequent analyses. The sequences for each SWN protein (if available) were obtained from NCBI, downloaded in fasta file format (Table 1).
The intergenic regions of the swainsonine gene cluster for 14 representative fungal species were obtained from NCBI for Pyrenophora seminiperda, Periconia macrospinosa, Alternaria oxytropis, Clohesyomyces aquaticus, Chaetothyriaceae sp., Metarhizium acridum, Microsporum canis, Nannizzia gypsea, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Pseudogymnoascus sp., Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica, Rosellinia necatrix, Xylaria hypoxylon, and Tothia fuscella. The intergenic regions were analyzed to determine all possible combinations (characters) (Table 2). The genomic positions for each gene in each representative fungus were also recorded (Supplementary Table S1A,B). The intergenic regions were analyzed for possible open reading frames (ORFS) through NCBI ORFS Finder tool. ORFS for each fungus were blasted and ORFS that had significant similarities were recorded (Supplementary Tables S2–S14).
Sequences of each protein were compared with Geneious Prime® 2020.2.2 and aligned with MUSCLE with the following parameters: sequences grouped by similarity, anchor optimization, distance measure kmer6_6, clustering method UPGMB, tree rooting method pseudo, and sequence weighting scheme CLUSTALW. Sequences were manually edited to remove any low-quality bases. Maximum parsimony trees were used to construct the phylogenetic protein trees for the seven swainsonine genes and the five intergenic-region trees using PAUP* plugin with heuristic search strategy, fastStep search type and 1000 replications. The outgroup for each SWN gene represented the closest non-SWN-containing taxon of the Hypocreales. The binary tree was constructed using winclada and nona, max trees 100, and 10 replications. The ITS tree was constructed using nucleotides sequences from NCBI for the 14 representative species: Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica (EU041767.1), Pseudogymnoascus sp. (MN417288.1), Chaetothyriales sp. (MW222228.1), Tothia fuscella (MH865619.1), Periconia macrospinosa (JX427048.1), Pyrenophora seminiperda (MW577415.1), Alternaria oxytropis (KJ143732.1), Xylaria hypoxylon (GU300095.1), Rosellinia necatrixisolate (EF026117.1), Clohesyomyces aquaticus (MT627678.1), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (KT253558.1), Nannizzia gypsea (MT328584.1), Microsporum canis (EU200371.1), and Metarhizium acridum (HM055449.1), and Tothia was the outgroup. Slafractonia was not included in this analysis because the SWN cluster is not contiguous. Trees were built using PHYML 3.3.20180621 [29], substitution model HKY85, and X1000 bootstrap values.
An isolate of Pyrenophora seminiperda was obtained from Susan Meyer of the U.S. Forest Service in Provo, UT. The isolate was grown on PDA for 14 days. Mycelia was air dried and subsequently analyzed for swainsonine. Swainsonine was detected using methods previously described [30,31].

3. Results

3.1. Swn Genes

All swainsonine gene matches were to fungal species, representing 11 orders within the Ascomycota, with the exception of Quercus suber. Quercus suber belongs to the kingdom Plantae. SwnK and swnH2 genes were identified from all fungi assessed in this study, while swnA and swnT were the identified for the fewest fungi (Table 1). The swnA gene was the least frequently identified among the fungi assessed and was not identified among all Pleosporales and Xylariales members, as well as the Fusarium sp., Tothia fuscella, Pseudogymnoascus sp., and Rhizodiscinia lignyota. Quercus suber contained all the SWN genes with the exception of swnR, swnT, and swnA.
As expected, the swnK gene was identified in all the fungi assessed (Table 1, Figure 1) since it was used as the basis for inclusion in the study. Protein similarity, as shown in the SwnK tree, was generally shared by fungi within the same order, with the exception of the Fusarium sp. from the Hypocreales and the taxa from the Pleosporales which formed three different clades. Notably, there was a clade of four taxa representing at least three orders with bootstrap support of 81%. All taxa that have been reported to contain swainsonine contained swnK consistent with reports showing it to be essential for swainsonine biosynthesis [12] (Table 1).
All taxa that have been reported to contain swainsonine contained swnH2 as did all taxa that contained swnK (Table 1). The SwnH2 tree was similar to SwnK for the fungal orders, Hypocreales and Onygenales, with the exception of Microsporum canis not grouping together with other Onygenales taxa. Other members from other orders diverged in the SwnH2 tree as well (Figure 2), including some taxa of the Xylariales and Pleosporales. For example, in the Xylariales two taxa grouped together with 94% bootstrap support while two others grouped with a taxon from the Microthyriales with 100% bootstrap support.
The swnN gene was found in all taxa of interest except Rosellinia necatrix and Xylaria polymorpha (Table 1). All taxa that have been reported to contain swainsonine contain swnN (Table 1). The SwnN tree was similar to the SwnK tree for the order Onygenales and Hypocreales. The SwnN tree was unique in that all of the Pleosporales members with the exception of Periconia macrospinosa grouped together with 52% bootsrap support, which was not observed in the other trees (Figure 3). Similar to the SwnK tree, there was the clade of four taxa representing at least three orders with a bootstrap support of 82%.
The swnH1 gene was found in all fungi except for Rosellinia necatrix, Xylaria polymorpha, and Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica (Table 1). All taxa that have been reported to contain swainsonine contain swnH1 (Table 1). The SwnH1 tree showed a similar pattern to the SwnK tree where similar members of the Hypocreales, Onygenales, and Xylariales, and some Pleosporales grouped together (Figure 4).
The swnR gene was found in all fungi examined except Trichophyton mentagrophytes (Table 1). All taxa that have been reported to contain swainsonine contain swnR (Table 1). In the SwnR tree, only the Hypocreales and Onygenales members formed their own clades. Members of the Pleosporales showed a similar grouping pattern to the SwnK tree in which the Pleosporaceae species (P. seminiperda and A. oxytropis) grouped into one clade, and the C. aquaticus and S. leguminicola grouped into another clade (Figure 5).
The swnA gene was detected in the Onygenales, all Hypocreales with the exception of the Fusarium sp., and a single taxon of four other orders (Table 1). Taxa that have been reported to produce and not produce swainsonine were among the taxa that contained swnA (Table 1). Members of the Hypocreales and Onygenales grouped together in the SwnA tree, respectively, and were part of a larger clade that included the two taxa belonging to the Eurotiales and Caliciales, while the two taxa belonging to the Capnodiales and the Chaetothyriales grouped together into a single clade with 88% bootstrap values (Figure 6). Notably, the grouping together of the two taxa belonging to the Capnodiales and the Chaetothyriales had not been observed in other trees.
The swnT gene was detected in the Hypocreales, Onygenales, two taxa of the Xylariales, and single taxa of three other orders. Taxa that have been reported to produce and not produce swainsonine were among the taxa that contained swnT (Table 1). Interestingly Slafractonia leguminicola was the only taxon of the Pleosporales found to contain swnT (Table 1, Figure 7). Similar to other trees, in the SwnT tree, members of the Onygenales, Hypocreales, and Xylariales grouped together, respectively (Figure 7).

3.2. Intergenic Regions

The intergenic regions between the SWN genes for 14 representative fungi were assembled and analyzed (Table 2). Six fungi with the following 13 characteristics (combinations) were denoted as Type A: swnH2–swnK, swnR–swnN, swnK–swnR, swnH1–swnT, swnN–swnH1, swnT–swnN, swnT–swnH2, swnH2–swnR, swnH1–swnH2, swnA–swnH2, swnA–swnH1, swnN–swnA, and swnR–swnH1 (Table 2, Figure 8). Inverted intergenic regions were detected in two fungi (except for swnT–swnH2 and swnR–swnH1 that had no inversions) were denoted as Type-B. Six fungi had a mix of both types and were classified as Type A/B.
The swnH2 gene appeared to be the most variable position in that it was found joined with all the other genes, except with swnN. The swnN and swnH1 genes were found in four combinations, and swnR, swnT, and swnA genes were found in three combinations. The swnK was the least variable and it joined only with swnH2 and swnR.
The sizes of the intergenic regions were greater than 500 bp for most of the fungi with exception to the intergenic region between swnH1 and swnH2, which was under 50 bp in the Pleosporales (Table 2). Intergenic regions greater than 1000 bp were recorded with the hydrogenases: swnH2–swnK, swnH1–swnT, swnT–swnH2, swnH2–swnR, swnA–swnH2, and swnR–swnH1. The intergenic region between swnH2–swnK was conserved in all fungi expect for Clohesyomyces aquaticus, and the region between swnR-swnN was the second most conserved. The Chaetothyriaceae sp. fungus and Xylaria hypoxylon possessed the largest intergenic region of swnH2–swnK and swnH1–swnT. Alternaria oxytropis contained a large intergenic region of 2007 bp between swnN-swnH1.
The intergenic region between swnH2–swnK was shared by all but one fungus assessed, Clohesyomyces aquaticus (Table 2). The intergenic regions swnR–swnN, swnK–swnR, swnH1–swnT, swnN–swnH1, and swnT–swnN were shared by five or more of the 14 fungi assessed. The intergenic regions swnT–swnH2, swnH2–swnR, swnH1–swnH2, swnA–swnH2, and swnN–swnA were found in three of the fungi assessed. The intergenic region swnA–swnH1 was found in two fungi, and swnR–swnH1 was found only in Periconia macrospinosa.
In the phylogenetic tree of the intergenic regions, the 14 fungi separated into two major groups (Figure 9). One group consisted of all Pleosporales members, Pseudogymnoascus sp., and Rosellinia necatrix, and the other group consisted of all other fungi. Alternaria oxytropis, Pyrenophora seminiperda, and Clohesyomyces aquaticus were separated from Periconia macrospinosa by characters 7 (swnH2–swR), 8 (swnH1–swnH2), and 12 (swnR–swnH1). The black circle on the branches indicates the characters only changed at that spot on the tree, while number 1 indicates the presence of that character and 0 indicates absence. Xylaria hypoxylon shared more similarities with the bottom group, and the Onygenales shared the highest number of similarities.
Five trees of the intergenic regions were informative among some of the taxa investigated: swnH2–swnK, swnH1–swnT, swnK–swnR, swnN–swnH1, and swnT–swnN. In the swnH2–swnK tree, two members of the Pleosporales, Alternaria oxytropis, and Pyrenophora seminiperda, and two members of the Onygenales, Nannizzia gypsea and Trichophyton mentagrophytes, grouped together, respectively, with high boots strap support (Figure 10). These same taxa grouped together with high bootstrap support in other intergenic trees when they were present (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14). In some trees these respective taxa grouped with other members of the same order, respectively, such as Microsporum canis and Clohesyomyces aquaticus (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14).

3.3. ITS Phylogeny

A phylogenetic tree of the internal transcribed sequences (ITS) for the 14 representative fungi was constructed to help compare the relationships between the fungi for this set of noncoding regions with those from the SWN intergenic regions and SWN proteins. Taxa belonging to the same orders, Onygenales, Pleosporales, and Hypocreales grouped together with good boot strap support as one would expect (Figure 15). Metarhizium acridum (Hypocreales) grouped with the Xylariales with high bootstrap support consistent with the fact that they both belong to the same fungal class, Sordariomycetes.

3.4. Open Reading Frames within the Intergenic Regions

Many of the intergenic regions contained open reading frames (ORFS) (Table 2, Supplementary Tables S2–S14). However, generally only ORFS under 30 amino acids (aa) showed matching identity with proteins in databases. Most matches were to fungi, with much fewer matches to bacteria, and amoebae. There were also matches to plants, which may be due to errors in the databases. The swnN–swnH1, swnT–swnH2, and swnR–swnH1 intergenic regions matched only fungi, while the other intergenic regions had matched with bacteria or amoebae also. Overall, 5 of the 14 fungi assessed only matched fungal ORFS.
The fungi Aspergillus, Fusarium, the Onygenales Trichophyton benhamiae, Metarhizium robertsii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were recorded repeatedly as fungal matches (Supplementary Tables S2–S14). Interestingly, the yeast fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae was recorded repeatedly with high percentages, although for non-related functions. Some high fungal percent identity and query cover were observed. For example, the yeast fungus Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans shared 80% query cover and 90% percent identity with Periconia macrospinosa in the swnH2–swnK intergenic region. Similarly, Fusarium graminearum and Aspergillus nidulans shared 100% percent identity with Xylaria hypoxylon based on their swnH2–swnK intergenic region. Other high percentages were recorded with Aspergillus niger (swnH1–swnT), Neurospora crassa (swnH1–swnT), Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (swnN–swnH1), Debaryomyces hansenii (swnN–swnH1), Trichophyton benhamiae (swnT–swnH2, swnR–swnH1), Metarhizium robertsii (swnT–swnH2, swnR–swnH1), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (swnN–swnA), and Coprinopsis cinerea okayama (swnN–swnA).
Interestingly, some of the ORFS were matches to bacterial species. Nannizzia gypsea recorded the highest number of bacterial similarities in the following intergenic regions and their bacterial matches: swnK–swnR (Euplotes aediculatus), swnH1–swnT (Shewanella piezotolerans), swnT–swnN (Escherichia coli), and swnN–swnA (Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens) and percent identity and query cover were high. Alternaria oxytropis recorded bacterial similarities as well, in swnH2–swnK (Geobacillus thermodenitrificans). Other bacterial similarities were homofermentative species Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Leuconostoc mesenteroides were matches to Rosellinia necatrix in the swnH2–swnK with 100% identity and 67% query cover. The Gram-negative fish bacteria Yersinia ruckeri was a match to Clohesomyces aquaticus in the swnN-swnR with 81% query cover and 69.23% identity.
The amoeboid slime mold Dictyostelium discoideumn was recorded in swnH2–swnK as a match to Pyrenophora seminiperda, Periconia macrospinosa, and Pseudogymnoascus sp., in swnR–swnN as a match to Chaetothyriaceae sp., in swnK–swnR as a match to Nannizzia gypsea, and in swnH2–swnA as a match to Microsporum canis. The Xylariales member Xylaria hypoxylon shared similarities with the protozoan pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi with 80% query cover and 67% identity in the swnK–swnR. Four different accessions of Ipomoea carnea (Kingdom: Planta) were matches to the seed transmitted fungus Chaetothyriaceae with 100% query covers in swnH2–swnK.
Some fungal matches shared predicted functions for their orfs, while others were unrelated to secondary metabolites. The matches to Fusarium, Alternaria, Aschochyta, Aspergillus, Omphalotus, Metarhizium, and Trichophyton, showed a function of non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, highly reducing polyketide synthase, non-reducing reducing polyketide synthase, and swainsonine genes. Other fungal matches showed dissimilarities in function, for example, Saccharomyces cerevisiae match in the swnH2–swnK was a ribonuclease P protein component in the mitochondria. Bacterial matches were more dissimilar in their function.

3.5. Swainsonine

Swainsonine was detected in the isolate of Pyrenophora seminiperda (Table 1). Swainsonine was previously detected in several of the species herein [12].

4. Discussion

The SWN gene clusters were identified from fungi within the orders Hypocreales, Chaetothyriales, Onygenales, Pleosporales, and a Leotiomycetes sp., as previously reported [12], and in additional species of these orders. Additional orders of fungi were also found to contain the SWN gene cluster including the Xylariales, Capnodiales, Microthyriales, Caliciales, Patellariales, and Eurotiales. The SWN cluster was also detected in the higher plant Quercus suber which is not expected as swainsonine has not been shown to be a plant product. We suspect that the Quercus suber plant material that was the source of the DNA sequenced was likely associated with a fungal symbiont of some unknown genus that contained the SWN genes. Notably, the morning glory plant Ipomoea carnea was matched with the fungus Chaetothyriaceae sp. intergenic region; Chaetothyriaceae sp. is a seed transmitted fungus of the plant Ipomoea carnea [7,32]. In both cases, we suspect that these genes belonged to fungi living on or within the plants.
The swnK gene was identified in all fungi. This was expected since swnK is required for swainsonine production and is highly conserved among swainsonine-producing fungi [12,20]. The swnH2 gene was found in all taxa also suggesting the important role of this gene for the synthesis of swainsonine. Deletion of the swnH2 or swnH1 gene in Metarhizium robertsii resulted in the inability of the fungus to produce swainsonine while deletion of swnN, swnR, swnT, and swnA reduced swainsonine production to varying amounts in M. robertsii but did not eliminate it [19]. These results may suggest that species lacking the SwnH1 gene may not produce swainsonine. Furthermore, not all SWN genes are likely required for swainsonine biosynthesis in all taxa as Slafractonia leguminicola, Pyrenophora seminiperda, and Alternaria oxytropis were missing some of the SWN genes and still produced swainsonine.
In general, the SWN proteins from different fungi that clustered together with the most confidence were also fungi that are the most closely related. For example, all Trichophyton and Metarhizium species grouped together with greater than 90% percent bootstrap support for each respective protein within the SWN cluster. These results suggest that the SWN gene cluster was present in a recent common ancestor from each of these respective genera. Subsequently as the individual species in these two genera have diverged there have been rearrangements and recombination events that have resulted in the order of the respective SWN genes, as shown herein.
In contrast, the SWN proteins in the different taxa of the Pleosporales clustered with one other Pleosporales species but not others or clustered with taxa representing other orders. Specifically, Alternaria oxytropis and Pyrenophora seminiperda grouped together in all trees with bootstrap confidence values over 91%, while Slafractonia leguminicola and Clohesyomyces aquaticus grouped together in the SwnK, SwnR, and SwnN trees. Pyrenophora macrospinosa did not group with any member of the Pleosporales, but instead grouped with Tothia fuscella (Microthyriales), Pseudogymnoascus sp. (Leotiomycetes), and Rhizodiscinia lignyota (Patellariales). These results suggest that Alternaria oxytropis and Pyrenophora seminiperda likely shared the same common ancestor containing the SWN cluster. These results are consistent with a recent report of Creamer et al. [21] demonstrating that several polyketide synthases in Alternaria oxytropis were most closely related to paralogs in Pyrenophora seminiperda rather than other Alternaria species. Further supporting this observation is the fact that none of the closely related Alternaria species that have been sequenced contain the SWN cluster. The three groups among the different species of the Pleosporales belong to different families, which might explain the high variability within this group. The patterns observed in this study, combinations and inversions, and absence of genes, suggest that the swainsonine gene cluster was not transferred as a whole-cluster gain to a common ancestor within the Pleosporales but may have originated several times within the order.
Slafractonia leguminicola was the only member of the Pleosporales which contained swnT. It is likely that SwnT serves a role in transferring swainsonine within or out of the cell as was suggested in Cook et al. [12]. Slafractonia was also separated from other fungi in the swnT tree. The presence and absence of different SWN genes among different members of the Pleosporales suggests that the SWN genes may have been inherited from different common ancestors, and that the SWN genes may still be undergoing evolutionary changes within the Pleosporales.
In summary, the divergence of the secondary metabolites gene clusters between closely related Ascomycota spp. is hypothesized to be the result of functional diversity, de novo assembly, and/or horizontal gene transfer [33]. Manning et al. [34] reported a horizontal gene transfer and gene duplications events in NRPSs of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Horizontal gene transfer and orthologous functional diversity were also discussed as contributing factors to the variability found in Alternaria oxytropis SWN genes [21]. In this study, the diversity found within fungal members and the bacterial matches in the ORFs could be due to a combination of horizontal gene transfer, gene duplications, and functional diversity. The high percentage identity recorded for bacterial matches in the open reading frames could suggest bacterial ontogeny. The gene transfer of secondary metabolites from bacteria to ascomycetes was suggested by Lawrence et al. [28], which reported that the hybrid NPS/PKS could have been acquired by Ascomycota via HGT from a bacterial donor in the Burkholderiales early in the evolution of Pezizomycotina. The work here reinforces the diversity and the complex evolution of the swainsonine gene cluster in fungi.

5. Conclusions

Few fungal species are known for their production of the toxic alkaloid swainsonine. Despite their diversity, the SWN gene cluster was identified among several fungi. The diversity of the SWN cluster and the intergenic regions within the cluster mirrors the diversity of the various fungal orders; Pleosporales are highly diverse, while the Onygenales and Hypocreales are extremely conserved. The open reading frames in the intergenic regions matched primarily fungi, however the high percentage identity recorded for bacterial matches could suggest bacterial ontogeny for portions of the cluster. These SWN cluster analyses provide a basis for understanding the evolution of secondary metabolites and the mechanisms responsible for the complexity of this cluster in fungi.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8040359/s1. Table S1A: SWN gene arrangements in each fungus; Table S1B: The genomic positions. swnN intergenic region was not found in Periconia macrospinosa as it is in different scaffold; Table S2: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnH2-swnK information; Table S3: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnR-swnN information; Table S4: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnK-swnR information; Table S5: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnH1-swnT information; Table S6: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnN-swnH1 information; Table S7: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnT-swnN information; Table S8: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnT-swnH2 information; Table S9: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnH2-swnR information; Table S10: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnH1-swnH2 information; Table S11: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnA-swnH2 information; Table S12: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnA-swnH1 information; Table S13: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnN-swnA information; Table S14: Open reading frames ORFs in the intergenic region swnR-swnH1 information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N., D.C. and R.C.; methodology, M.N., S.D., D.C. and R.C.; analysis, M.N., S.D., D.C. and R.C.; writing, M.N., D.C. and R.C.; supervision, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dale Gardner for conducting swainsonine analysis. Thanks to Donovan Bailey for assistance with character analyses and phylogenetic trees. Thanks to Susan Myer for providing the isolate of Pyrenophora seminiperda. Thanks to the Ministry of Higher Education of Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Arabian Culture Mission, and New Mexico State University for funding the education of M.N.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dorling, P.R.; Huxtable, C.R.; Colegate, S.M. Inhibition of lysosomal α-mannosidase by swainsonine, an indolizidine alkaloid isolated from Swainsona canescens. Biochem. J. 1980, 191, 649–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tulsiani, D.R.; Harris, T.M.; Touster, O. Swainsonine inhibits the biosynthesis of complex glycoproteins by inhibition of Golgi mannosidase II. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 7936–7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Winchester, B.; al Daher, S.; Carpenter, N.C.; Cenci di Bello, I.; Choi, S.S.; Fairbanks, A.J.; Fleet, G.W.J. The structural basis of the inhibition of human α-mannosidases by azafuranose analogues of mannose. Biochem. J. 1993, 290, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Colegate, S.M.; Dorling, P.R.; Huxtable, C.R. A spectroscopic investigation of swainsonine: An α-mannosidase inhibitor isolated from Swainsona canescens. Aust. J. Chem. 1979, 32, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cook, D.; Gardner, D.R.; Pfister, J.A. Swainsonine-containing plants and their relationship to endophytic fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7326–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Grum, D.S.; Cook, D.; Baucom, D.; Mott, I.W.; Gardner, D.R.; Creamer, R.; Allen, J.G. Production of the alkaloid swainsonine by a fungal endophyte in the host Swainsona canescens. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1984–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cook, D.; Beaulieu, W.T.; Mott, I.W.; Riet-Correa, F.; Gardner, D.R.; Grum, D.; Pfister, J.; Clay., K.; Marcolongo-Pereira, C. Production of the alkaloid swainsonine by a fungal endosymbiont of the Ascomycete order Chaetothyriales in the host Ipomoea carnea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3797–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Braun, K.; Romero, J.; Liddell, C.; Creamer, R. Production of swainsonine by fungal endophytes of locoweed. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Li, Q. Swainsonine-producing fungal endophytes from major locoweed species in China. Toxicon 2010, 56, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. . Schneider, M.J.; Ungemach, F.S.; Broquist, H.P.; Harris, T.M. (1S, 2R, 8R, 8aR)-1, 2, 8-trihydroxyoctahydroindolizine (swainsonine), an α-mannosidase inhibitor from Rhizoctonia Leguminicola. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patrick, M.; Adlard, M.W.; Keshavarz, T. Production of an indolizidine alkaloid, swainsonine by the filamentous fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae. Biotechnol. Lett. 1993, 15, 997–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cook, D.; Donzelli, B.G.; Creamer, R.; Baucom, D.L.; Gardner, D.R.; Pan, J.; Moore, N.; Krasnoff, S.; Jaromczyk, J.; Schardl, C.L. Swainsonine biosynthesis genes in diverse symbiotic and pathogenic fungi. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 1791–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Oldrup, E.; McLain-Romero, J.; Padilla, A.; Moya, A.; Gardner, D.; Creamer, R. Localization of endophytic Undifilum fungi in locoweed seed and influence of environmental parameters on a locoweed in vitro culture system. Botany 2010, 88, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Baucom, D.L.; Romero, M.; Belfon, R.; Creamer, R. Two new species of Undifilum, fungal endophytes of Astragalus (locoweeds) in the United States. Botany 2012, 90, 866–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ralphs, M.H.; Mickelsen, L.V.; Turner, D.L. Cattle grazing white locoweed: Diet selection patterns of native and introduced cattle. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. J. Range Manag. Arch. 1987, 40, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cook, D.; Ralphs, M.; Welch, K.; Stegelmeier, B. Locoweed poisoning in livestock. Rangelands 2009, 31, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Alhawatema, M.S.; Gebril, S.; Cook, D.; Creamer, R. RNAi-mediated down-regulation of a melanin polyketide synthase (pks1) gene in the fungus Slafractonia leguminicola. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Leger, R.J.S.; Wang, C. Genetic engineering of fungal biocontrol agents to achieve greater efficacy against insect pests. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Luo, F.; Hong, S.; Chen, B.; Yin, Y.; Tang, G.; Hu, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C. Unveiling of swainsonine biosynthesis via a multibranched pathway in fungi. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 2476–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Noor, A.I.; Neyaz, M.; Cook, D.; Creamer, R. Molecular characterization of a fungal ketide synthase gene among swainsonine-producing Alternaria species in the USA. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2554–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Creamer, R.; Hille, D.B.; Neyaz, M.; Nusayr, T.; Schardl, C.L.; Cook, D. Genetic relationships in the toxin-producing fungal endophyte, Alternaria oxytropis using polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal peptide synthase genes. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chooi, Y.H.; Tang, Y. Navigating the fungal polyketide chemical space: From genes to molecules. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9933–9953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Boettger, D.; Hertweck, C. Molecular diversity sculpted by fungal PKS–NRPS hybrids. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Johnson, R.D.; Johnson, L.; Itoh, Y.; Kodama, M.; Otani, H.; Kohmoto, K. Cloning and characterization of a cyclic peptide synthetase gene from Alternaria alternata apple pathotype whose product is involved in AM-toxin synthesis and pathogenicity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Weber, G.; Schörgendorfer, K.; Schneider-Scherzer, E.; Leitner, E. The peptide synthetase catalyzing cyclosporine production in Tolypocladium niveum is encoded by a giant 45.8-kilobase open reading frame. Curr. Genet. 1994, 26, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hertweck, C. The biosynthetic logic of polyketide diversity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4688–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lind, A.L.; Wisecaver, J.H.; Lameiras, C.; Wiemann, P.; Palmer, J.M.; Keller, N.P.; Rodrigues, F.; Goldman, G.; Rokas, A. Drivers of genetic diversity in secondary metabolic gene clusters within a fungal species. PLoS Biol. 2017, 15, e2003583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lawrence, D.P.; Kroken, S.; Pryor, B.M.; Arnold, A.E. Interkingdom gene transfer of a hybrid NPS/PKS from bacteria to filamentous ascomycota. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gardner, D.R.; Molyneux, R.J.; Ralphs, M.H. Analysis of swainsonine: Extraction methods, detection, and measurement in populations of locoweeds (Oxytropis spp.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4573–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gardner, D.R.; Cook, D. A comparison of alternative sample preparation procedures for the analysis of swainsonine using LC-MS/MS. Phytochem. Anal. 2011, 22, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Neyaz, M.; Gardner, D.R.; Creamer, R.; Cook, D. Localization of the Swainsonine-Producing Chaetothyriales Symbiont in the Seed and Shoot Apical Meristem in Its Host Ipomoea carnea. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rokas, A.; Mead, M.E.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Raja, H.A.; Oberlies, N.H. Biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution of fungal chemodiversity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manning, V.A.; Pandelova, I.; Dhillon, B.; Wilhelm, L.J.; Goodwin, S.B.; Berlin, A.M.; Figueroa, M.; Ciuffetti, L.M. Comparative genomics of a plant-pathogenic fungus, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, reveals transduplication and the impact of repeat elements on pathogenicity and population divergence. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2013, 3, 41–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jof 08 00359 g001 550
Figure 1. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnK. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Ilyonectria destructans (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAH7007558.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 1. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnK. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Ilyonectria destructans (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAH7007558.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g001
Jof 08 00359 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnH2. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM44118.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 2. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnH2. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM44118.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g002
Jof 08 00359 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnN. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Moelleriella libera (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KZZ92942.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 3. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnN. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Moelleriella libera (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KZZ92942.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g003
Jof 08 00359 g004 550
Figure 4. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnH1. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM44118.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 4. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnH1. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM44118.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g004
Jof 08 00359 g005 550
Figure 5. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnR. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Ilyonectria destructans (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAH7007559.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 5. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnR. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Ilyonectria destructans (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAH7007559.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g005
Jof 08 00359 g006 550
Figure 6. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnA. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Coniochaeta sp. (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAB5525774.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 6. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnA. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Coniochaeta sp. (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KAB5525774.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g006
Jof 08 00359 g007 550
Figure 7. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnT. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM36795.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 7. Maximum parsimony protein tree resulting from the analysis of SwnT. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Neonectria ditissima (Hypocreales) was used as the outgroup and obtained from NCBI database, GenBank accession: KPM36795.1. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g007
Jof 08 00359 g008 550
Figure 8. Intergenic region types map of three representative fungi. Intergenic regions colored red indicates type A combination (ex: swnH2-swnK in Chaetothyriaaceae) and intergenic regions colored blue indicates type B combination (ex: swnK–swnH2 in M. canis). Metarhizium acridum contained both types A and B are labeled as A/B type. Chaetothyriaceae sp. only contained type A (A dominant), and Microsporum canis only contained type B (B dominant). Numbers under intergenic regions represent their size, nt = nucleotides.
Figure 8. Intergenic region types map of three representative fungi. Intergenic regions colored red indicates type A combination (ex: swnH2-swnK in Chaetothyriaaceae) and intergenic regions colored blue indicates type B combination (ex: swnK–swnH2 in M. canis). Metarhizium acridum contained both types A and B are labeled as A/B type. Chaetothyriaceae sp. only contained type A (A dominant), and Microsporum canis only contained type B (B dominant). Numbers under intergenic regions represent their size, nt = nucleotides.
Jof 08 00359 g008
Jof 08 00359 g009 550
Figure 9. Binary phylogenetic tree of the presence or absence of intergenic region combinations (characters) in representative fungi. The 0–12 numbers on top of each circle represent character number with 0 being assigned to swnH2–swnK (see Table 2). The 0 and 1 under each circle represent absence (0) or presence (1) of that character. The closed circles indicate that the character only changes at that one spot on the tree, and the open circles indicate changes elsewhere on the tree also.
Figure 9. Binary phylogenetic tree of the presence or absence of intergenic region combinations (characters) in representative fungi. The 0–12 numbers on top of each circle represent character number with 0 being assigned to swnH2–swnK (see Table 2). The 0 and 1 under each circle represent absence (0) or presence (1) of that character. The closed circles indicate that the character only changes at that one spot on the tree, and the open circles indicate changes elsewhere on the tree also.
Jof 08 00359 g009
Jof 08 00359 g010 550
Figure 10. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnH2–swnK intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 10. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnH2–swnK intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g010
Jof 08 00359 g011 550
Figure 11. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnH1–swnT intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 11. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnH1–swnT intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g011
Jof 08 00359 g012 550
Figure 12. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnK–swnR intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 12. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnK–swnR intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g012
Jof 08 00359 g013 550
Figure 13. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnN–swnH1 intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 13. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnN–swnH1 intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g013
Jof 08 00359 g014 550
Figure 14. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnT–swnN intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 14. Maximum parsimony DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the swnT–swnN intergenic region sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g014
Jof 08 00359 g015 550
Figure 15. DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacer ITS sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Tothia fuscella was used as the outgroup. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Figure 15. DNA tree resulting from the analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacer ITS sequence data. Bootstrap confidence values from 1000 bootstrap replicates are presented at each corresponding node. Tothia fuscella was used as the outgroup. Fungal orders are indicated next to each organism/clade.
Jof 08 00359 g015
Table
Table 1. SWN protein homologues and Genebank accession numbers. (-) indicates the absence of that gene in the NCBI database. (*) indicates that the organism has been reported to produce swainsonine (Cook et al., 2017).
Table 1. SWN protein homologues and Genebank accession numbers. (-) indicates the absence of that gene in the NCBI database. (*) indicates that the organism has been reported to produce swainsonine (Cook et al., 2017).
Classification Genebank Accessions
Genus and SpeciesOrderswnKswnH2swnNswnH1swnRswnAswnT
Pyrenophora seminiperda *PleosporalesRMZ73569RMZ73568RMZ73566RMZ73567RMZ73565--
Periconia macrospinosaPleosporalesPVI03268PVI03269PVI03272PVI03273PVI03271--
Slafractonia leguminicola *PleosporalesAQV04236AQV04235AQV04233AQV04234AQV04232-AQV04231
Alternaria oxytropis *PleosporalesAQV04230AQV04229AQV04227AQV04228AQV04226--
Clohesyomyces aquaticusPleosporalesORY11783ORY11779ORY11781ORY11780ORY11782--
Microsporum canisOnygenalesXP_002850891XP_002850892XP_002850894XP_002850896XP_002850890XP_002850893XP_002850895
Nannizzia gypsea *OnygenalesXP_003176907XP_003176906XP_003176904XP_003176902XP_003176908XP_003176905XP_003176903
Trichophyton benhamiae *OnygenalesXP_003014124XP_003014123DAA76506XP_003014119XP_003016302XP_003014122XP_003014120
Trichophyton verrucosumOnygenalesXP_003020763XP_003020762XP_003020760XP_003020758XP_003022179XP_003020761XP_003020759
Trichophyton violaceumOnygenalesOAL75151OAL75150OAL75148OAL75146OAL69278OAL75149OAL75147
Trichophyton soudanenseOnygenalesEZF69148EZF69147EZF69143EZF69142EZF69504EZF69146EZF69144
Trichophyton rubrum * 118892OnygenalesXP_003238870XP_003238869XP_003238867XP_003238865XP_003238559XP_003238868XP_003238866
Trichophyton tonsuransOnygenalesEGD97139EGD97140EGD97142EGD97144EGD97826EGD97141EGD97143
Trichophyton equinum *OnygenalesEGE01982EGE01983EGE01985EGE01987EGE02341EGE01984EGE01986
Trichophyton interdigitale * H6OnygenalesEZF30502EZF30503EZF30348EZF30351EZF32734KDB22224EZF30349
Trichophyton mentagrophytesOnygenalesGBF63673GBF63672GBF63670GBF63668-GBF63671GBF63669
Metarhizium acridum CQMHypocrealesXP_007815889XP_007815888XP_007815891XP_007815893XP_007815890XP_007815894XP_007815892
Metarhizium anisopliae 53293HypocrealesKJK74452KJK74453KJK74450KJK74448KJK74451KJK74447KJK74449
Metarhizium brunneum * 3297HypocrealesXP_014543166XP_014543167XP_014543164XP_014543162XP_014543165XP_014543161XP_014543163
Metarhizium guizhouense * 977HypocrealesKID83603KID83604KID83601KID83599KID83602KID83598KID83600
Metarhizium majus * 297HypocrealesKID96318KID96317KID96320KID96322KID96319KID96323KID96321
Metarhizium robertsii * 23HypocrealesXP_007824811XP_007824812XP_007824809XP_007824807XP_007824810XP_007824806XP_007824808
Fusarium sp. NRRL 66182HypocrealesKAF5022960KAF5022961KAF5022958KAF5022962KAF5022959--
Chaetothyriaceae sp. *ChaetothyrialesAQV04224AQV04220AQV04221AQV04219AQV04222AQV04223-
Xylaria hypoxylonXylarialesTGJ83472TGJ83466TGJ83449TGJ83451TGJ83448-TGJ83450
Xylaria multiplexXylarialesKAF2965339KAF2965340KAF2965337KAF2965359KAF2965338-KAF2965358
Xylaria grammicaXylarialesRWA14357RWA14350RWA14377RWA14352RWA14351--
Xylaria polymorphaXylarialesKAH8158131KAH8158129--KAH8158130--
Rosellinia necatrixXylarialesGAP93000GAP93001--GAP93002--
Pseudovirgaria hyperparasiticaCapnodialesXP_033604919XP_033604918XP_033604921-XP_033604920XP_033604917XP_033604916
Tothia fuscellaMicrothyrialesKAF2430781KAF2430780KAF2430777KAF2430776KAF2430778--
Pseudogymnoascus sp.LeotiomycetesKFY51099KFY51100KFY51103KFY51104KFY51102--
Quercus suberFagalesXP_023929147XP_023929150XP_023929148XP_023929149---
Physcia stellarisCalicialesKAG6993713KAG6993712KAG6993710KAG6993709KAG6993711KAG6993708-
Rhizodiscinia lignyotaPatellarialesKAF2103738KAF2103739KAF2103742KAF2103743KAF2103741--
Talaromyces rugulosusEurotialesXP_035344740XP_035344739XP_035344742XP_035344744XP_035344741XP_035344738XP_035344743
Table
Table 2. Intergenic regions (IG) of swainsonine genes. These 13 combinations of IG are represented as characters 0–12. The letters A, B, and A/B placed next to each organism represent the type of combination. Type A are those from 0–12, type B is their inversion, and type A/B indicates the organism has mix of A and B types. Numbers represent IG length. (*) after IG size indicates that IG was inverted (type B). Codes under each IG length (with the letter O) represent open reading frames (ORF). The number before the “O” indicates the number of ORFs with significant matches, and the letters after the “O” represent match type, F = fungus, B = bacteria, and A = amoeba. Other codes: (-) = absence of character, (-----) = blast search did not record any matches, (−v) = overlap, (N/A) = ORFS do not exist. (1O-) no significant matches due to low query cover QC and/or percent identity PI.
Table 2. Intergenic regions (IG) of swainsonine genes. These 13 combinations of IG are represented as characters 0–12. The letters A, B, and A/B placed next to each organism represent the type of combination. Type A are those from 0–12, type B is their inversion, and type A/B indicates the organism has mix of A and B types. Numbers represent IG length. (*) after IG size indicates that IG was inverted (type B). Codes under each IG length (with the letter O) represent open reading frames (ORF). The number before the “O” indicates the number of ORFs with significant matches, and the letters after the “O” represent match type, F = fungus, B = bacteria, and A = amoeba. Other codes: (-) = absence of character, (-----) = blast search did not record any matches, (−v) = overlap, (N/A) = ORFS do not exist. (1O-) no significant matches due to low query cover QC and/or percent identity PI.
Character0123456789101112
OrganismswnH2-swnKswnR-swnNswnK-swnRswnH1-swnTswnN-swnH1swnT-swnNswnT-swnH2swnH2-swnRswnH1-swnH2swnA-swnH2swnA-swnH1swnN-swnAswnR-swnH1
Pyrenophora seminiperda A1162
3O/FA		40
-----		--606
2O/F		---3
-----		----
Periconia macrospinosa A/B913 *
4O/FA		------1808
1O/-		----1993
6O/F
Alternaria oxytropis A1094
2O/FB		275
1O/A		--2007
1O/F		---47
-----		----
Clohesyomyces aquaticus B-285
2O/FB		651
3O/F		-511
1O/F		---45
-----		----
Microsporum canis B1453
1O/F		-348
1O/-		1043
-----		-212
N/A		---1267
1O/FA		-674
1O/F		-
Nannizzia
gypsea A		1774
1O/-		-621
2O/FA		1080
3O/FB		-316
2O/B		---976
1O/F		-823
3O/FB		-
Trichophyton mentagrophytes A1353
1O/-		--1014
4O/F		-306
-----		---970
3O/F		-878
-----		-
Metarhizium acridum A/B1808
6O/F		851
1O/-		451
2O/F		1317 *
1O/F		-293 *
-----		----390 *
1O/-		--
Chaetothyriaceae
sp. A		1989
3O/F		863
3O/FA		320
1O/-		2139
2O/F		--163
-----		---945
3O/B		--
Xylaria hypoxylon A/B2581 *
3O/F		870 *
-----		184 *
3O/F		1576
1O/-		-842
1O/F		-------
Rosellinia necatrix A/B1664
2O/B		------1208 *
1O/A		-----
Pseudovirgaria hyperparasitica A899
1O/F		154
-----		−v---1910
6O/F		------
Tothia
fuscella A/B		437
3O/F		−v *--805 *
2O/F		-1646
3O/F		------
Pseudogymnoascus sp. A/B1519 *
6O/FA		568
2O/F		--639
1O/F		--1958
3O/F		-----
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neyaz, M.; Das, S.; Cook, D.; Creamer, R. Phylogenetic Comparison of Swainsonine Biosynthetic Gene Clusters among Fungi. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040359

AMA Style

Neyaz M, Das S, Cook D, Creamer R. Phylogenetic Comparison of Swainsonine Biosynthetic Gene Clusters among Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(4):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neyaz, Marwa, Sumanjari Das, Daniel Cook, and Rebecca Creamer. 2022. "Phylogenetic Comparison of Swainsonine Biosynthetic Gene Clusters among Fungi" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 4: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040359

APA Style

Neyaz, M., Das, S., Cook, D., & Creamer, R. (2022). Phylogenetic Comparison of Swainsonine Biosynthetic Gene Clusters among Fungi. Journal of Fungi, 8(4), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8040359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop