Next Article in Journal
Sources of Antifungal Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
Engineering Flocculation for Improved Tolerance and Production of d-Lactic Acid in Pichia pastoris
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Gene Content Diversity, Phylogenomic Contour, Putative Virulence Determinants, and Potential Diagnostic Markers within Pythium insidiosum Traits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii in Food and Biotechnology Industries

1
Institute of Life Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
2
Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Zhejiang Province & Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Pharmaceutical Development of Growth Factors, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
3
Department of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China
4
School of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(2), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020170
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Utilization of Yeast Resources)

Abstract

:
Pichia kudriavzevii is an emerging non-conventional yeast which has attracted increased attention for its application in food and biotechnology areas. It is widespread in various habitats and often occurs in the spontaneous fermentation process of traditional fermented foods and beverages. The contributions of P. kudriavzevii in degrading organic acid, releasing various hydrolase and flavor compounds, and displaying probiotic properties make it a promising starter culture in the food and feed industry. Moreover, its inherent characteristics, including high tolerance to extreme pH, high temperature, hyperosmotic stress and fermentation inhibitors, allow it the potential to address technical challenges in industrial applications. With the development of advanced genetic engineering tools and system biology techniques, P. kudriavzevii is becoming one of the most promising non-conventional yeasts. This paper systematically reviews the recent progress in the application of P. kudriavzevii to food fermentation, the feed industry, chemical biosynthesis, biocontrol and environmental engineering. In addition, safety issues and current challenges to its use are discussed.

1. Introduction

Yeasts have played an indispensable role in the history of human development, with diverse applications and tremendous influence in the fields of food, biotechnology, daily chemicals and pharmaceuticals. They usually dominate in spontaneous fermented foods, contributing to desirable flavors, and have been domesticated to drive today’s industrial food fermentation as well as genetically engineered for industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals production. Among them, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regarded as a dominant workforce for bioprocesses due to its “generally regarded as safe” status, well-characterized physiology and ease of engineering [1]. However, biotechnological processing with S. cerevisiae faces increasing challenges, partly due to its inherent characteristics such as poor tolerance to environmental stresses and limitation in available carbon sources [2]. Moreover, the use of only S. cerevisiae for controlled fermentation processes limits the sensorial characteristics of products, making it difficult to meet the diversified demands of consumers [3]. These drawbacks have led to the emergence of non-conventional yeasts as attractive biotechnological hosts due to their advantageous phenotypes such as native stress tolerance, capacity to metabolize diverse carbon sources and the release of unique flavors.
Pichia kudriavzevii, a non-conventional yeast, is ubiquitous in natural environments and occurs in traditionally fermented foods and beverages in every continent across the globe (Figure 1). Although its safety has always been a controversial issue, it has attracted increased attention over the past two decades due to its potential application in food processing and biotechnology. It is sometimes thought to be a spoilage yeast that causes biofilm formation and odor release, but more often it contributes to the formation of flavor compounds and exhibits probiotic properties, and it has been now used as a starter culture, either alone or with other yeasts, to obtain fermented products with consistent quality. On account of its inherent characteristics such as high tolerance to pH, ethanol, high temperature, hyperosmotic stress and lignocellulosic inhibitors, P. kudriavzevii has prompted interest for industrial applications [4]. In fact, at least two platform chemicals, including glycerol and succinic acid, have successfully been commercially produced using P. kudriavzevii as the biotechnological host [5,6]. However, its biotechnological applications are still limited, mainly due to the knowledge gap of its genetic background and difficulties in genetic manipulation. More recently, numerous studies have focused on the mining of multi-omics information, the development of efficient genetic tools including inducible promoters, expression plasmids and gene editing systems, and the introduction of heterologous metabolic pathways, which allow P. kudriavzevii to be utilized as a promising biotechnological chassis for the production of high-value-added chemicals. In addition, P. kudriavzevii has also showed promising application prospects in environmental management and the postharvest biocontrol of fruits. However, there are few systematic reviews on its biotechnological applications, and the most recent one was published a decade ago [7]. In this review, we attempt to comprehensively summarize the current status of P. kudriavzevii in the food, feed and biotechnology industries. We also highlight concerns over its safety and provide some discussion of current challenges.

2. Taxonomy and Physiology of P. kudriavzevii

The brief history and taxonomy of P. kudriavzevii have been described in the earlier reviews [7,8]. This species, characterized by the formation of spherical ascospores, was initially named Issatchenkia orientalis, but was then transferred to the Pichia genus under the name of Pichia kudriavzevii by Kurtzman et al. [9]. Although the name I. orientalis has since been abandoned, it is still used by some researchers today, probably as a result of multiple sequence alignments during the strain identification as many rRNA gene sequences of strains using the name I. orientalis were uploaded to NCBI database in the early days. Candida krusei, often used to name clinical isolates, was initially proposed as the asexual form (anamorph) of P. kudriavzevii, sharing identical sequences of the D1/D2 regions of the 26S ribosomal DNA [9]. Douglass et al. employed genomic diversity analysis on strains isolated from different environments with different species names. Whole genome alignment performed on the two type strains of C. krusei (CBS573T) and P. kudriavzevii (CBS5147T) showed 99.6% nucleotide sequence identity, with collinear genomes [10]. The industrial glycerol-producing strain Candida glycerinogenes can also be identified as P. kudriavzevii, since their gene sequences, including 18S rDNA, are highly identical [10]. In the context of increasing academic studies on this species, P. kudriavzevii should be adopted as the only name according to the principle of “One Fungus One Name”, to avoid the use of multiple names impeding academic exchange.
P. kudriavzevii produces ovoid or elongated ellipsoidal cells that resemble long-grain rice, and it shows dimorphic transitions characterized by pseudohyphae growth and biofilm formation upon the induction of nutrient limitations [11,12]. We have reported that extreme low-pH stress also induces the formation of pseudohyphae and the progressive development of multicellular clusters, which is not conductive to mass transfer during fermentation [13]. This phenotype is different from that of C. albicans, whose hyphal morphologies are induced by neutral to alkaline pH [14]. Biofilm formation is considered to be associated with invasive growth and food spoilage and therefore has attracted attention both in the food industry and clinical research.
P. kudriavzevii is a crabtree-negative yeast that rapidly grows without ethanol generation under conditions with sufficient dissolved oxygen [15]. It can metabolize and utilize a variety of carbon sources with glucose as the preferred one, but there are individual differences in their utilization capacities. For example, most isolates cannot utilize xylose and sucrose as a sole carbon source, but some strains were reported to have this capability [16]. In any case, the poor xylose-assimilation has become a limiting factor for P. kudriavzevii being used in cellulosic ethanol production, although numerous studies have shown its high tolerance to cellulose inhibitors and other harsh conditions [2,17]. The high tolerance to environmental stresses may be one of the reasons for the occurrence of P. kudriavzevii in a variety of naturally fermented foods around the world and makes this species a promising robust platform for chemical biosynthesis.

3. Application in Fermented Foods and Feed Industry

3.1. Fermented Alcoholic Beverages

3.1.1. Wine

P. kudriavzevii is a representative non-Saccharomyces yeast present in vineyard and winery environments which has a positive influence on the spontaneous wine fermentations, contributing to the improvement of aromatic profiles and organoleptic complexity. It was reported to be the fourth most common non-Saccharomyces yeast isolated from must samples in 2016, a year of port wine with recognized outstanding quality [18], suggesting a potential role of P. kudriavzevii. Its addition into must had no adverse effect on the growth of S. cerevisiae and the physicochemical properties of wines, but increased the content of esters and fatty acids, probably due to the production of various hydrolases [19]. Moreover, P. kudriavzevii degrades malic acid, which is detrimental to wine quality when present in high amounts in grapes [20,21]. The tolerance of P. kudriavzevii to high sugar concentrations is a favorable trait for the production of sweet wine using overripe Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Its co-fermentation with S. cerevisiae reduced the residual sugar and acid content, and produced more intense floral and caramel odors [22]. These studies showed the great potential of P. kudriavzevii in the winemaking industry, mainly reflected in its sugar tolerance and deacidification characteristics, as well as its contribution to flavor diversity.

3.1.2. Chinese Liquor

P. kudriavzevii participates and plays a major role in the fermentation process of traditional Chinese liquor, a popular distilled liquor for thousands of years. It was identified as a dominant functional yeast during the fermentation of Chinese light-flavor, strong-flavor, miscellaneous-flavor and sauce-flavor liquor [23,24,25,26]. P. kudriavzevii may have originated mainly from Daqu, the fermentation starter which usually contributes 61.1 to 80.0% of fungal communities during liquor fermentation [27]. Source-tracking analysis of microbial communities in Daqu confirmed that P. kudriavzevii mainly originated from its production environments, including indoor floors and tools [28]. Correlation analyses between microorganisms and metabolites showed that P. kudriavzevii primarily participated in the formation of ethanol and some flavor compound precursors such as acetate and acetaldehyde [29]. In addition, P. kudriavzevii exhibits the capacity to degrade lactic acid, which is usually accumulated during liquor fermentation, thereby facilitating the growth of S. cerevisiae and ethanol production [30]. Its contribution to liquor fermentation makes it a potential starter to improve the quality and stability of liquor products, although such controlled liquor fermentation is still far from being realized.

3.1.3. Other Alcoholic Beverages

P. kudriavzevii is also found in the fermentation of other alcoholic beverages, including beer, fermented fruits or berries, and traditional cereal beverages. The increasing demand for new beers with specific characteristics has stimulated a shift in beer brewing from monoculture, using Saccharomyces species, to co-culture with non-conventional yeasts to alter the aromatic profile and therefore improve sensory quality. P. kudriavzevii was used as an aromatic starter in Côte d’Ivoire and co-fermented with S. cerevisiae to obtain beers with lower alcohol content and relatively more esters [31,32]. Alcoholic beverages fermented from diversified fruits and berries are also attracting more and more young consumers because of their novel and unique flavors. Fermentation with P. kudriavzevii produced higher amounts of ethyl acetate than that with S. cerevisiae, and endowed unique aromas such as bitter almond and cheese aroma [33,34]. In addition, its co-fermentation with other yeast species confers potential probiotic properties. For example, its co-fermentation products with Wickerhamomyces subpelliculosus using cornelian cherry fruits positively affected the composition of intestinal microbiota in an in vitro model of gastrointestinal tract digestion [35]. However, the role of P. kudriavzevii in the fermentation of traditional alcoholic beverages is sometimes negative. Biofilm, a characteristic associated with spoilage of beverages, forms on the surface of obutoka and Kombucha, two traditional alcoholic beverages [36,37]. Nonetheless, P. kudriavzevii is one of the non-Saccharomyces yeasts that has received the most attention in the fermentation process of alcoholic beverages in recent years. Studies on its interactions with other microbial communities and contribution to flavor profiles are essential for the process control and standardized production of alcoholic beverages.

3.2. Dairy Products

3.2.1. Fermented Milk

P. kudriavzevii has been isolated from several indigenous fermented milk products from different areas, although it was reported to be lactase-negative [38,39,40,41]. Several studies highlighted the spoilage potential of P. kudriavzevii because of its film-forming property under acidic conditions, and the release of alcohols and esters thought to be associated with off-flavors of fermented milk beverages [42,43]. On the other hand, P. kudriavzevii from a traditional fermented cow milk in Colombia was reported to produce peptides with Angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity, which has the effect of lowering blood pressure [44]. Co-culture of P. kudriavzevii, Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecalis was proved to be the most effective combination for making fermented milk with higher ACE inhibitory activity [45]. However, biofilm formation and off-flavor reduce people’s willingness to consume, so P. kudriavzevii is clearly undesirable for naturally fermented milk, and its population dynamics should be monitored for process control.

3.2.2. Cheese

The microbial diversity and dynamics throughout the manufacturing and ripening process of cheeses have a comprehensive influence on the safety, quality and organoleptic characteristics of cheese products, and thus have been the focus of research. P. kudriavzevii was encountered in various cheese types, probably originating from the milk and cheeses-making environments. Lavoie et al. reported that P. kudriavzevii in raw cow milk could survive the manufacturing process and affect cheese ripening [46]. P. kudriavzevii plays a positive role in the development of the cheese flavor; it displays extracellular protease and lipase activities, which may contribute to the formation of texture and characteristic flavors [47,48]. It was reported to produce a range of aroma compounds and provided pleasing flavor such as brandy, herbaceous, and onion flavors when used as an auxiliary starter for Kazak cheese [47,49]. Some P. kudriavzevii strains isolated from cheeses exhibited potentially probiotic properties such as high hydrophobicity, antimicrobial activity, autoaggregation and the ability to survive the gastrointestinal tract [50,51]. However, P. kudriavzevii has also been recognized in certain regions as a spoilage yeast for cheesesthat cause off-flavors and texture alterations [52,53]. This difference in perception may be explained in part by regional preferences for cheese texture and flavor.

3.3. Coffee Beans and Cocoa Beans

Wet fermentation is one of the primary coffee processing steps in which de-mucilage is carried out through microbial action [54]. P. kudriavzevii was identified as one of the predominate yeasts throughout the wet fermentation of Australian coffee beans [55,56]. Unlike the traditional perception, P. kudriavzevii had no significant effect on the mucilage degradation but contributed to the generation of several aromatic compounds [57,58]. Inoculation fermentation of P. kudriavzevii increased the levels of ketones, pyrazines, and furans of roasted beans which endowed coffee with desirable sensory characteristics [59]. Recently, P. kudriavzevii was also isolated from the fermentation process of Arabica coffee, which has an enhancement effect on sensory impact and quality [60,61].
Similar to what occurs in coffee bean processing, microbial fermentation is also an essential step in cocoa bean processing, which strongly influences the formation of precursors for chocolate flavor and aroma [62]. P. kudriavzevii dominates this spontaneous fermentation process in some cocoa-producing regions and can survive even after drying [63,64]. It was well-adapted to the high temperature conditions during cocoa fermentation in the Agneby-Tiassa region, and exhibited high pectinolytic activities in acidic conditions at the early stage of fermentation, thus degrading the pulp of the cocoa bean [65]. Compared with spontaneous fermentation, mono-fermentation of P. kudriavzevii or co-fermentation with S. cerevisiae can accelerate the fermentation process and modulate the chemical characteristics of cocoa beans [66,67]. In addition, P. kudriavzevii has a significant degradation effect on toxic compounds such as biogenic amines, reflecting the significance of its application in food safety [68]. These laboratory scale studies demonstrated that the introduction of P. kudriavzevii as a starter culture is a promising method to enhance fermentation processes and achieve controlled fermentation of cocoa beans [66,67,68]. However, before that can be fully implemented, some parameters that affect the phenotypes of P. kudriavzevii during processing and challenges in technical scale-up need to be addressed.

3.4. Fermented Vegetables

P. kudriavzevii is considered to be a major spoilage yeast responsible for the developing of off-odor and texture softening of kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented vegetable [69]. It exhibits high polygalacturonase activity which catalyzes the hydrolysis of pectin, and thus decreases the hardness of over-ripened kimchi. Inoculation with P. kudriavzevii in kimchi preparation produced odor compounds, including methanethiol, that further confirmed its identity as a spoilage yeast [69]. Moreover, the formation of white colonies on the surface of kimchi has caused consumer complaints and concerns about safety issues, although a recent study confirmed the safety of P. kudriavzevii ingestion via kimchi consumption [70]. Nonetheless, to avoid economic losses, controlling P. kudriavzevii growth in kimchi is an important subject to extend the shelf life and reassure customers.

3.5. Fermented Cereals

Traditional cereal-based fermented foods are particularly important in providing adequate calories and nutrients in some African countries where resources are relatively scarce. P. kudriavzevii usually exhibits probiotic properties as well as high folate-producing capacity and is used as a starter culture for fermented cereals to overcome the heterogeneity of the products and improve the nutritional value [71,72]. Greppi et al. reported that the co-culture of P. kudriavzevii and Lactobacillus fermentum in pearl millet porridge produced high quantities of folate, showing the nutrient enrichment effect [73]. Ogunremi et al. reported the role of P. kudriavzevii OG32 in the increasing of flavor compounds and antioxidant activity of fermented cereals [74], and highlighted its ability to secrete phytases, demonstrating its potential to improve the bioavailability of minerals in fermented cereal [75]. Therefore, the probiotic and nutritional enrichment properties of P. kudriavzevii make it a promising candidate as a functional starter culture for cereal-based fermentation.

3.6. Applications as a Feeding Additive

The application of rumen-native microorganisms as a feed additive is an effective strategy to improve feed efficiency and animal performance. P. kudriavzevii was reported as a dominant yeast in bovine rumen that can survive in simulated ruminal fluid and produce cellulase and large amounts of biomass, making it a better microbial additive than the commonly used S. cerevisiae [76,77]. It is reported that application of P. kudriavzevii improved the quality of ensiled rice straw, although an earlier study on corn silage showed that high populations of P. kudriavzevii had an adverse effect on fiber digestibility [78,79]. A feeding study showed that supplementation of P. kudriavzevii T7 powder could improve milk yield and reduce somatic cell counts, hence improving dairy production efficiency [80].
Additionally, P. kudriavzevii as a feed additive has the advantage of degrading mycotoxins, which are present in most feedstuffs and cause severe health problems after being consumed by animals, and which can even be transferred and excreted into raw milk, leading to food safety issues. Feeding experiments revealed that dietary supplementation of P. kudriavzevii YSY2 reduced the conversion of aflatoxin B1 from feed into aflatoxin M1 in raw milk, and mitigated the negative effects of aflatoxin B1 on dry matter intake and milk composition [81]. P. kudriavzevii strains isolated from broilers’ feedstuff also showed a high adsorption capacity for aflatoxin B1, which was then used as a feed additive to alleviate the toxic effect on broilers [82,83]. The commercial potential of P. kudriavzevii as a feed additive needs to be explored by more basic research, such as the determination of feeding dosage and incorporation with other yeasts. Recently, Native Microbials Inc. had submitted a request to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) to evaluate the use of P. kudriavzevii as a direct-fed microbial in diets of dairy cattle, but this assessment has been since ceased due to safety concerns (FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2022).

4. Applications in Biotechnology

4.1. Biochemicals Production

The application of the model host S. cerevisiae for next-generation chemical production faces increasing technical challenges which are difficult to overcome, in part due to its inherent limitations. Non-conventional yeasts possess potential advantages over S. cerevisiae such as broad substrate spectrum, inherent physiology characteristics and ability to tolerate harsh growth conditions, and their bioprocess applications have made remarkable progress with the development of systems biology and synthetic biology. Table 1 provides an overview of P. kudriavzevii and other well-studied non-conventional yeasts and their industrially relevant phenotypes. The desirable intrinsic phenotypes of P. kudriavzevii have attracted extensive attention in the production of second-generation bioethanol, glycerol and organic acids, etc. Here we summarize the current research status of this promising biotechnological host in chemical bioprocessing.

4.1.1. Bioethanol

The most widespread usage of P. kudriavzevii in biotechnology is in the production of bioethanol due to its inherent characteristics of high ethanol tolerance and desirable ethanol production capacity. P. kudriavzevii outperforms some industrial S. cerevisiae strains in terms of fermentation efficiency under harsh conditions such as high temperature, low pH and the presence of lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds, thus exhibiting great potential for second-generation bioethanol production. Numerous studies have reported its applications in bioethanol production from renewable substrates such as rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, corncob, food waste, etc. Table 2 summarizes the performance of P. kudriavzevii in bioethanol production under diverse processes.
Ethanol fermentation at high temperatures offers substantial benefits such as lower cooling costs, reduced risk of contamination and cost of saccharification enzymes during simultaneous saccharification fermentation (SSF) [2,91]. S. cerevisiae used in the traditional ethanol industry has high production rates and tolerance to ethanol, but comparatively low fermentation temperature (25–35 °C). By contrast, P. kudriavzevii shows better cell growth and ethanol production capacity above 40 °C, and some isolates can ferment at up to 45 °C; thus, it is considered to be another promising thermotolerant yeast species in addition to Kluyveromyces marxianus. For instance, P. kudriavzevii HOP-1 produced 10%, 35%, and 200% more ethanol than an industrial S. cerevisiae strain at 35, 40 and 45 °C, respectively [92]. P. kudriavzevii MBY1358 produced 107.33 g/L ethanol from 200 g/L glucose within 40 h at 44 °C [93]. Metabonomics analysis revealed that the overproduction of unsaturated fatty acids, pyrimidines and purines might contribute to its thermotolerance trait [94]. Exogenous addition of NaCl was proven to be an effective approach for improving the biomass and ethanol yield of P. kudriavzevii at 45 °C, and this inorganic salt cross-protection effect may be attributed to the induction of key enzymes and intermediates in carbohydrate metabolism and the reduction in oxidative damage [95]. These studies provide important engineering targets for further improvement of bioethanol production at high temperatures by genetically modified P. kudriavzevii.
The acid-tolerance trait of P. kudriavzevii allows ethanol fermentation under low-pH conditions without the application of neutralizing agents, resulting in lower production costs. Seong et al. reported that the ethanol yield of I. orientalis MTY1 at pH 3.0 was similar to that of S. cerevisiae D452-2 at its optimum pH condition of 6.0 [94]. The combined effects of low-pH and salt stresses on the ethanol production were also evaluated. I. orientalis MF-121 produced 5.3% v/v ethanol from the medium containing 50 g/L Na2SO4 at pH 3.0, while S. cerevisiae K-7 could not grow under the same condition [96]. Overall, these instances suggest that P. kudriavzevii is a more promising biotechnological host than S. cerevisiae for low-pH ethanol production, mainly benefiting from its low-pH tolerant trait.
A large amount of research has focused on the bioethanol production of P. kudriavzevii from widely available and inexpensive renewable agricultural resources. Several P. kudriavzevii strains with sucrose assimilation ability were employed to ferment sugarcane juices, which is rich in sugars, organic nutrients and minerals, and is an ideal substrate for ethanol fermentation [97,98]. Galactose adaptation of P. kudriavzevii can produce 30% more ethanol than non-adapted cells from sugarcane juices, probably due to enhanced sugar uptake [98]. P. kudriavzevii has multiple tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors such as furfural, acetic acid and hydroxymethylfurfural, and can even ferment non-detoxified hydrolysates to produce ethanol. For example, the ethanol yield of I. orientalis KJ27-7-fermented wheat straw hydrolysate reached 97% of the theoretical value [99]. Kwon et al. reported that there was no significant difference in ethanol productivity using I. orientalis IPE100 between fermenting detoxification and non-detoxification steam-exploded cornstalk [100]. The robust physiology of P. kudriavzevii also confers its potential application in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). In the SSF of alkali-treated rice straw, P. kudriavzevii HOP-1 produced 35% and 200% more ethanol than S. cerevisiae at 40 and 45 °C, respectively [92].
Table 2. Ethanol production by P. kudriavzevii strains under various conditions.
Table 2. Ethanol production by P. kudriavzevii strains under various conditions.
StrainsSubstratesEthanol ProductionFermentation ConditionsReferences
MF-121Glucose5.50% (v/v)10 g/L Na2SO4, pH 2.0[96]
RZ8-1Glucose69.9 g/L, 1.46 g/L·h40 °C[101]
RZ8-1Sugarcane bagasse
hydrolysate
33.8 g/L, 1.41 g/L·h40 °C[101]
IPE 100Cornstalk hydrolysate45.9 g/L, 0.96 g/L·h42 °C[100]
IPE 100Sweet sorghum stalk0.25 g/g-dry stalkSolid state fermentation[102]
UnnamedSugarcane juice71.9 g/L, 4.0 g/L·h40 °C[98]
ITV-S42Glucose66.2 g/L, 2.67 g/L·h200 g/L initial glucose
concentration
[103]
HOP-1Alkali-treated rice straw24.3 g/L, 1.10 g/L·hSSF, 40 °C, pH 5.0[92]
HOP-1Sweet sorghum bagasse hydrolysate26.8 g/L, 0.56 g/L·hSSF, 35 °C, pH 5.0[104]
KJ27-7Wheat straw hydrolysate10.3 g/L, 0.43 g/L·h, 0.5 g/g glucose26 °C, pH 5.0[99]
4AMalted barley115.1 g/L, 4.80 g/L·h40 °C, pH 5.0[105]
LC375240Cassava peel5.4%(w/v), 1.45 g/L·h, 0.38 g/g glucoseSSF, 40 °C[106]
SIRice straw33.4 g/L, 1.07 g/L·hSSF, 42 °C, uncontrolled pH[84]
KVMP10Citrus peel waste
hydrolysate
30.7 g/L42 °C[107]
NBRC1664Japanese cedar without pretreatment23.8 g/L, 0.74 g/L·hSSF, 35 °C[108]
DMKU3-ET15Cassava starch
hydrolysate
7.35% (w/v), 2.23 g/L·h40 °C, pH 5.0[109]
Pa27Xylose14.6 g/L, 0.27 g/g xylose42 °C[110]
BrkUndetoxified acid-
hydrolyzed corncob
3.64 g/L, 28% of the theoretical yield42 °C[111]
BrkDetoxified acid-
hydrolyzed corncob
3.93 g/L, 32% of the theoretical yield42 °C[111]
Note: SSF (simultaneous saccharification and fermentation); RBF (repeated batch fermentation).

4.1.2. Organic Acids

Owing to its high tolerance towards low-pH stress and organic acids, P. kudriavzevii is considered to be an attractive host for low-pH organic acids production. A lot of efforts have been made to exploit the low pH fermentation of various organic acids using recombinant P. kudriavzevii, some of which have reached a commercial scale (Table 3).
Succinic acid production using P. kudriavzevii is already at the stage of commercialization, implemented by BioAmber and its associated firms. Several academic papers and patents have disclosed the engineering strategies for succinic acid production in P. kudriavzevii. There are three primary pathways of succinic acid formation in mitochondria: reductive TCA cycle, oxidative TCA cycle and glyoxylate shunt pathway, among which the reductive TCA cycle has the highest theoretical succinic acid yield [6]. In addition to expressing reductive TCA cycle-related genes in P. kudriavzevii, inactivation of the mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDH) can also be used as a simple approach to achieve succinic acid accumulation. Furthermore, deleting the carboxylic acid transporter gene PkJEN2 prevents the re-entry of extracellular succinic acid into cells for catabolism [112]. On a commercial scale, BioAmber has several proprietary technologies for succinic acid production using recombinant P. kudriavzevii licensed by Cargill, and has been operating a plant at a scale of 30,000 tons per year since 2014. Their recombinant P. kudriavzevii can produce 48.2 g/L succinic acid at pH 3.0, with a yield of 0.69 mol/mol glucose and a productivity of 0.97 g/L/h [113]. By the application of direct crystallization might be at low pH, the unit operations in the process downstream are simplified, and with decreased investment costs. Unfortunately, BioAmber filed for bankruptcy in 2018, possibly due to the poor financial situation. However, the project for succinic acid production using P. kudriavzevii is still attracting investors. LCY Biosciences which purchased the assets of BioAmber claimed that their succinic acid capacity would be restored to 30,000 ton per year by 2023. Cargill also holds a patent for lactic acid production using engineered P. kudriavzevii, however, the productivity cannot meet the commercial demand [114]. A recent study reported a robust P. kudriavzevii strain that produced 135 g/L and 154 g/L of D-lactic acid at pH 3.6 and pH 4.7, with yields of 3.66 g/L/h and 4.16 g/L/h, respectively, after genetic engineering and adaptive evolution to improve lactic acid tolerance [85]. Compared with S. cerevisiae, which has been used for low-pH lactic acid production [115], P. kudriavzevii exhibited greater potential for commercial application; nonetheless, there is still a big margin for further improving the economic feasibility of lactic acid production.
P. kudriavzevii can be designed to oxidize xylose to xylonate by simple genetic modification. By expressing the heterogenous D-xylose dehydrogenase coding gene, the recombinant strain produced up to 171 g/L of D-xylonate at pH 5.5, and 146 g/L of D-xylonate at pH 3.0 [116]. The efficient production of D-xylonate under low-pH is attractive for industrial-scale production, and the economic viability could be further improved by using lignocellulosic biomass as feedstock. In our previous study, to improve the comprehensive utilization of sugars present in lignocellulose, we integrated xylose and glucose fermentation in an engineered P. kudriavzevii by a two-stage strategy whereby xylonate and ethanol were sequential produced from non-detoxified acid-pretrated corncob at low pH [117]; this provides a promising approach for reducing the overall cost of lignocellulose biorefinery. P. kudriavzevii is has also been genetically engineered to produce itaconic acid, which is currently produced by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus terreus. An engineered strain YB4010 was constructed by the CRISPR-Cas9 system, which produced 1232 mg/L itaconic acid in fed- batch fermentation without pH control [118]. The yield of itaconic acid in this study was still at very low levels, but the researchers provided effective genetic manipulation tools and proposed potential avenues for future endeavors to increase itaconic acid production.
Table 3. Summary of organic acids production by engineered P. kudriavzevii.
Table 3. Summary of organic acids production by engineered P. kudriavzevii.
Organic AcidsStrainsMetabolic Engineering StrategiesProductionFermentation ConditionsReferences
Succinic acidSD108
  • Overexpression of endogenous genes PYC, MDH, FUMR and an exogenous gene FDR from S.cerevisiae
11.6 g/L, 0.12 g/g, 0.11 g/L·h30 °C, uncontrolled pH[119]
CY902
  • Deletion of SDH5, deletion of PkJEN2-1 and PkJEN2-2
3.60 g/L30 °C, uncontrolled pH[112]
13171
  • Deletion of CYB2a, heterologous introduction of FRD1 from S. cerevisiae, MDH from Z. rouxii,FRD1 from T. brucei, and overexpression endogenous genes of FUM1 and PYC1
23.0 g/L, 0.26 g/L·h30 °C, pH 3.0[120]
13723
  • Deletion of URA and PDC, heterologous introduction of MAE from S. pombe, FRD from Leishmania mexicana,MDH from Rhizopus delemar, and overexpression endogenous genes of FUM1 and PYC1
48.20 g/L, 0.45 g/g
glucose,
0.97 g/L·h
30 °C, pH 3.0[113]
Lactic acidCD1690
  • Deletion of CYB2 and GPD1, and heterologous introduction of LDH from Lactobacillus helveticus
88 g/L, 2.6 g/L·h38–40 °C, pH 5.5[114]
NG7
  • Replacing PDC1with LDH derived from Lactobacillus plantarum
① 135 g/L, 3.66 g/L·h
② 154 g/L, 4.16 g/L·h
① 30 °C, pH 3.6
② 30 °C, pH 4.7
[85]
Itaconic acidYB4010
  • Deletion of ICD, heterologous introduction of CAD from A. terreus, and overexpression of Pk-mttA
1232 mg/L,
29.0 mg/g-glucose,
51 g/L·h
30 °C, uncontrolled pH[118]
D-xylonateVTT C-79090T
  • Heterologous introduction of xylB from Caulobacter crescentus
① 146 g/L, 1.2 g/L·h
② 171 g/L, 1.4 g/L·h
① 30 °C, pH 3.0
② 30 °C, pH 5.5
[116]

4.1.3. Glycerol

It is believed that osmotolerant yeasts accumulate large amounts of glycerol as an osmotic protectant to allow their growth under hyperosmotic conditions [5]. P. kudriavzevii is an osmotolerant yeast that can grow well in media containing more than 48% (w/v) glucose or 1.5 M NaCl [4], and thus has great potential for glycerol production. Indeed, as early as the 1970s, P. kudriavzevii was employed for glycerol production at a commercial scale in China, under the name of C. glycerinogenes [121]. By fruitful studies in microbial breeding and systematic optimization of the fermentation process, the yield of glycerol on an industrial scale was improved to more than 120 g/L with conversion efficiency of up to 58% using acid-hydrolyzed corn starch as substrate [121]. Moreover, P. kudriavzevii is also used for glycerol production under the name of C. krusei [122,123,124]. In the last decade, the enthusiasm for glycerol production by osmotolerant yeasts has gradually decreased, since large amounts of crude glycerol were co-produced in the biodiesel industry, marking it less economical. Nonetheless, the production of glycerol using P. kudriavzevii still deserves attention. P. kudriavzevii produces fewer by-products during glycerol fermentation, making the refining process easier and more economical [121], which can meet the growing demand for high-purity glycerol in pharmaceutical markets.

4.1.4. 2-Phenylethanol

The high cytotoxicity of 2-phenylethanol to cells is a bottleneck for its microbial production, while P. kudriavzevii exhibits higher 2-phenylethanol tolerance than other yeast species. Fan et al. reported a P. kudriavzevii strain that produced 5.09 g/L 2-phenylethanol in shake flasks, which was higher than most reported strains [125]. Oscar et al. explored the potential for more economical and sustainable production of 2-phenylethanol from P. kudriavzevii by solid-state fermentation using various agro-industrial wastes [126,127]. Although the current titers of 2-phenylethanol are far from sufficient for industrial production, P. kudriavzevii is still a promising platform for the production of 2-phenylethanol with high efficiency and at low cost. Applying diversified rational or irrational engineering to improve the 2-phenylethanol tolerance and metabolic engineering to enhance the flux of 2-phenylethanol synthesis are the main directions of future efforts.

4.1.5. Single-Cell Oils

Single-cell oils of oleaginous microorganisms have great potential as raw materials for biodiesel production due to their high productivity and economic feasibility. The oleaginous character of P. kudriavzevii was first described by Sankh et al. [128]. In a fed-batch fermentation using crude glycerol as a carbon source, the oil yield reached 23% of the cell dry weight. By contrast, while the oil-producing capacity of P. kudriavzevii is obviously not desirable, oleaginous yeasts such as Rhodosporidium toruloides and Yarrowia lipolytica can accumulate lipids in excess of 50% of the cell dry weight [129]. Encouragingly, another study on P. kudriavzevii reported a striking lipid content of 75.7% when glucose was used as the carbon source at a C/N ratio of 120/2, which is much higher than that in the first report [128,130]. It is noticeable that the use of high-value carbon sources like pure glucose is not economically feasible. Bettencourt et al. reported that P. kudriavzevii can utilize a wide range of cheap, waste-derived substrates rich in volatile fatty acids for oil production, such as the effluent filtrate from the anaerobic digestion of organic wastes [131]. Compared with model oleaginous yeasts, studies on lipids production of P. kudriavzevii are rare and relatively preliminary, in particular, none have explored the improvement of lipid content and composition by genetic engineering. With the development of genetic manipulation technology, P. kudriavzevii deserves more attention as a promising microbial oil factory in the future.

4.2. Applications in Environmental Management

Yeast cells are promising biosorbents that can be used for heavy metal removal from wastewater. P. kudriavzevii exhibited better performance in the bioaccumulation of cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) than S. cerevisiae, especially under complicated conditions such as low pH and high salinity [132,133]. The bioaccumulation capacity for heavy metals might highly depend on the robustness of the yeast cells, and some effective measures have been developed for improving their tolerance to heavy metals. For example, acid treatment was reported to improve the Cd resistance through cross-protection, resulting in an enhanced Cd removal rate [134]. Pollution sources of the mining areas and electroplating factories usually contain a variety of heavy metals, but few studies have focused on the combined impact of various metals on P. kudriavzevii. It was reported that P. kudriavzevii maintained its membrane integrity after treatment with Cd, Pb and Zn mixtures for 3 h, but began to lose it after 6 h due to the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species [135]. To facilitate their separation from effluent after bioremediation, an immobilization method on P. kudriavzevii was also developed. However, all these studies are still confined to the laboratory-scale, and further studies are required in various aspects, such as the improvement of bioaccumulation capacity, construction of biosorption modeling and development of novel immobilization techniques, for real-world applications to be considered.
P. kudriavzevii also has potential applications in the decolorization of molasses and textile wastewater. The strain No. SF9-246 was used to decolorize the melanoidin pigment in molasses wastewater by bioadsorption and biodegradation, and is considered more suitable for practical applications due to its growth and decolorization capability under acidic conditions [136]. It was also reported to decolorize textile dyes such as Blue RR-BB, Red 7B-HE and C.I. Basic Blue 41 [137,138]. P. kudriavzevii CR-Y103 decolorizes BB41 at a rate of 100% within 12 h and, importantly, the degraded metabolite was nontoxic [138].
P. kudriavzevii is reported to be one of the dominant fungal species during the early stage of composting, which is a promising technology for reclaiming organic waste materials as agricultural fertilizers [139]. It has been used as an inoculum to degrade the organic acid to increase the pH of raw compost material, thereby accelerating the progression of composting by enhancing the activity of the bacterial community [140]. However, organic acids might accumulate and inhibit the organic matter degradation due to the death of yeast cells caused by the elevated temperature during the thermophilic phase of composting. On the basis of the heat-resistant properties of P. kudriavzevii, Nakasaki et al. proposed a strategy of maintaining the temperature at 40 °C for 2 days after inoculation during the self-heating phase of composting, which was effective in accelerating the degradation of organic matter and enhancing bacterial activities [141].

4.3. Biological Control

P. kudriavzevii has been identified as an antagonistic yeast that might act against postharvest decay and mildew of fruits caused by fungal pathogens via multiple mechanisms of actions. Bleve et al. first reported the killer phenomenon of P. kudriavzevii against the ochratoxin A producer Aspergillus carbonarius and Aspergillus niger [142]. It showed the highest ability to produce killer toxins among several endophytic yeasts isolated from apple fruits [143]. However, purified killer toxin showed high activity against bacteria but low or no activity against fungi including Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp. and Candida sp. [144], suggesting that the preventive effect of P. kudriavzevii on fungal infections may be attributed to other mechanisms of action. In vitro and in vivo biocontrol assays against P. digitatum confirmed that multiple mechanisms, including biofilm formation, competition for nutrients, and production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), were employed by P. kudriavzevii to control green mold in citrus [145].
Morphological changes in yeasts occurring under abiotic stresses affect their biocontrol performance as the mode of life may influence the biology and interactions with pathogens and the plant hosts. Chi et al. reported that the biofilm formation of P. kudriavzevii increased its tolerance to environmental factors, including heat and oxidative stress, resulting in a higher biocontrol efficacy against postharvest diseases on pear fruit than the yeast-like form [146]. Thus, increasing biofilm formation by the application of a quorum-sensing molecule such as phenylethanol may be a point of interest for further improving the biocontrol effectiveness of P. kudriavzevii. VOCs emitted by biocontrol yeasts are considered to be applicable for controlling postharvest pathogens during storage under airtight conditions. A recent study revealed that VOCs produced by P. kudriavzevii were effective against a broad spectrum of molds, and volatile compounds with antimicrobial activity such as phenylethyl acetate and phenylethanol were identified [147].
The application of P. kudriavzevii may also disrupt the community succession because of the competition of nutrients and space among biocontrol yeasts, pathogenic microorganisms and other native epiphytic microflora on fruit surfaces. Liu et al. analyzed the effects of P. kudriavzevii treatment on microbial composition and population dynamics of cherry tomato surfaces during cold storage [148]. In this case, P. kudriavzevii was the dominant species at the initial storage period, but its relative abundance gradually decreased during the whole storage process, while the succession of pathogens was disrupted and the abundance of several other antagonistic yeasts increased, indicating that the biocontrol effectiveness of P. kudriavzevii relies on the altering of the fungal population community, but not on its competitive advantage [148]. In contrast, in another study highlighting its role in nutrition and space competition, the energy metabolism and nutrient utilization efficiency of P. kudriavzevii were enhanced by the synergistic promotion effect of calcium ascorbate treatment, resulting in improved biocontrol efficacy against cherry tomato gray mold [149]. Overall, similar to other antagonistic yeasts, multiple mechanisms cooperatively work in the biological control of P. kudriavzevii, and the complex interactions among the host, microbiome and environment remains to be further elucidated. Indeed, the application of P. kudriavzevii faces many obstacles, and is still insufficiently developed to be commercially available.

5. Pathogenicity of P. kudriavzevii

The great application of P. kudriavzevii in the field of food and biotechnology cannot conceal the fact that it is an opportunistic pathogen. P. kudriavzevii has long acted as a villain under the name of C. krusei, responsible for 2.8% of yeast infections in humans [150]. However, the pathogenicity of P. kudriavzevii is rarely mentioned by the researchers involved in food and biotechnology fields, possibly due to the use of different species names and less academic exchange between them and medical researchers. Strains isolated from clinical samples by medical researchers are often designated C. krusei, while the environment isolates used in food and biotechnology fields are referred to as P. kudriavzevii or I. orientalis. P. kudriavzevii sometimes inhabits the intestines of healthy individuals, but causes significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, including premature neonates, cancer patients, and hematologic malignancy patients [151,152,153,154]. Cases have shown that P. kudriavzevii is responsible for peritonitis, endophthalmitis, asthma, osteomyelitis and other diseases [8]. Recently, P. kudriavzevii has also been isolated from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, which requires attention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic [155].
Compared with other Candida species, fewer yeast infections are attributed to P. kudriavzevii, but its inherent resistance to fluconazole, the most commonly used antifungal agent for the treatment of yeast infection, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Crucially, strains isolated from food environments exhibited high resistance to fluconazole, as did strains isolated from clinical samples, suggesting that P. kudriavzevii used in food and biotechnology industries could also infect immunocompromised populations [10]. Although a healthy population with immunocompetence is not generally infected with P. kudriavzevii, the transient commensalism acquired from food or working environment might also bring potential risks. A study in Amerindians living in a remote community showed that over 30 % of the population carried P. kudriavzevii, probably acquired from food or living environments [156]. To escape the threat of drug resistance, effective explorations on improving the activity of existing drugs, searching for novel antifungal drugs and developing alternative treatment approaches were carried out for treating P. kudriavzevii infections. For example, Bianchin et al. developed fluconazole-loaded lipid core nanoparticles, and this delivery system can reverse fluconazole resistance [157]. Patriota et al. purified a trypsin inhibitor from Tecoma stans leaves, which showed anti-Candida activity and no cytotoxicity against human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [158]. However, the drug-resistance mechanism of P. kudriavzevii has not been well-understood, hindering the discovery of novel therapeutic targets and the development of new drugs, which requires further exploration.

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspective

In this review, we comprehensively summarized the current application of P. kudriavzevii in the food and biotechnology fields. With regards to food fermentation, P. kudriavzevii is often present in and dominates the spontaneously fermented foods, contributing characteristic flavors and showing probiotic potential, and can be used as a starter culture to improve the fermentation efficiency and achieve controllable food processing. The occurrence of P. kudriavzevii is beneficial for most fermented foods and beverages, but it is sometimes referred as a spoilage yeast due to biofilm formation and release of odors. Therefore, the application of P. kudriavzevii should also be distinguished for different fermented foods. For example, the P. kudriavzevii population should be monitored and controlled during the fermentation of milk and kimchi, while it can be used as a starter culture during the processing of cocoa and coffee beans. When it is used as a starter culture, the dosage may be an important factor affecting the quality of the fermented food, as the competition for nutrition and space has a strong influence on the microbial composition and population dynamics of the spontaneous fermentation and, further, on the texture, flavor and nutritive value of fermented products. Few studies have addressed this point, although Zhu et al. did report the influence of inoculation ratios on the flavor of fermented food during co-fermentation of P. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae [22]. Crucially, the safety of P. kudriavzevii has been highly controversial, both as an opportunistic pathogen that causes infection in immunocompromised people, and as a “generally recognized as safe” species retained in the updated inventory of microbial food cultures published by the International Dairy Federation in 2022 [159]. No genetic distinction and similar drug resistance between clinical isolates and environmental isolates suggest that traditional fermented foods may be a potential source of clinical infection. Even so, only few safety evaluations of P. kudriavzevii have been performed in the field of food fermentation, and numerous researchers have used this species as a starter culture for food application in recent years. Undoubtedly, it is unfeasible to prohibit the consumption of fermented foods whose fermentation process involves P. kudriavzevii, because spontaneous fermentation, while originally used as a reliable way of preserving food, has gradually developed into unique regional food cultures, especially in some economically backward regions. Therefore, developing novel antifungal drugs, avoiding the application of P. kudriavzevii in the standardized food industry, and altering immunocompromised people’s preference for traditional fermented foods are crucial for the effective management of infections. In contrast to other Candida species such as C. albicans and C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii has not received much attention in clinical practice, even though the abuse of antifungal drugs involving fluconazole has led to its increasing isolation from clinical samples. Future research on its drug-resistance mechanisms is crucial for the effective management of infections, and also to help in the development of novel drugs.
Inherent capabilities of industrial significance such as the tolerance to high temperatures, low pH and lignocellulosic inhibitors make P. kudriavzevii a promising microbial host. Its practical application in biotechnology lags far behind that of S. cerevisiae due to the lack of genetic manipulation tools for a long time; however, this dilemma has been recently ameliorated by the availability of higher-quality genomes, and efficient genetic tools, including episomal plasmid and CRISPR/Cas9 systems [160,161]. The establishment of these genetic tools can make it easy to control gene expression, balance metabolic flow and even introduce heterologous metabolic pathways and transport systems, which would also contribute to the study of mechanisms underpinning industrially relevant phenotypes. Omics techniques have also been widely used to explore the stress tolerance mechanism of P. kudriavzevii, and these can provide more valuable genetic information for the further construction of engineered strains with better traits. In addition, knowledge gaps regarding physiological mechanisms, such as the cell morphogenesis involved in biofilm formation and multicellular growth in clusters under certain conditions, should also be filled as these may be undesirable for food, industrial fermentation and the treatment of infections. Compared with other non-conventional yeasts, the inability or only slow utilization of xylose is a key bottleneck limiting the application of P. kudriavzevii to ethanol or other chemical production from lignocellulosic biomass. In this context, introducing heterogenous xylose metabolism and transporter systems in P. kudriavzevii is an essential step for further improving the economic viability of the lignocellulosic industry. Furthermore, some key metabolic pathways and transporters are still uncharacterized, limiting the application of cheap substrates such as crude glycerol. Overall, for a fruitful microbial cell factory, there is an urgent need to fill the knowledge gaps around the genetic and metabolism basis of key P. kudriavzevii attributes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J. and Y.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. and M.L.; writing—review and editing, H.J., L.J. and X.D.; visualization, J.J.; funding acquisition, H.J., X.D. and K.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ20C200015) and Basic scientific research projects of Wenzhou (ZR2022181).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nielsen, J. Yeast Systems Biology: Model Organism and Cell Factory. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, e1800421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Thorwall, S.; Schwartz, C.; Chartron, J.W.; Wheeldon, I. Stress-tolerant non-conventional microbes enable next-generation chemical biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Steensels, J.; Verstrepen, K.J. Taming wild yeast: Potential of conventional and nonconventional yeasts in industrial fermentations. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mukherjee, V.; Radecka, D.; Aerts, G.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Lievens, B.; Thevelein, J.M. Phenotypic landscape of non-conventional yeast species for different stress tolerance traits desirable in bioethanol fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Semkiv, M.V.; Ruchala, J.; Dmytruk, K.V.; Sibirny, A.A. 100 years later, what is new in glycerol bioproduction? Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, C.; Ong, K.L.; Cui, Z.; Sang, Z.; Li, X.; Patria, R.D.; Qi, Q.; Fickers, P.; Yan, J.; Lin, C.S.K. Promising advancement in fermentative succinic acid production by yeast hosts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yadav, J.S.; Bezawada, J.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Candida krusei: Biotechnological potentials and concerns about its safety. Can. J. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 937–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jamiu, A.T.; Albertyn, J.; Sebolai, O.M.; Pohl, C.H. Update on Candida krusei, a potential multidrug-resistant pathogen. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurtzman, C.P.; Robnett, C.J.; Basehoar-Powers, E. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 939–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Douglass, A.P.; Offei, B.; Braun-Galleani, S.; Coughlan, A.Y.; Martos, A.A.R.; Ortiz-Merino, R.A.; Byrne, K.P.; Wolfe, K.H. Population genomics shows no distinction between pathogenic Candida krusei and environmental Pichia kudriavzevii: One species, four names. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. van Rijswijck, I.M.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Wolkers-Rooijackers, J.C.; Abee, T.; Smid, E.J. Nutrient limitation leads to penetrative growth into agar and affects aroma formation in Pichia fabianii, P. kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2015, 32, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomez-Gaviria, M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current aspects in the biology, pathogeny, and treatment of Candida krusei, a Neglected Fungal Pathogen. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1673–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ji, H.; Xu, K.; Dong, X.; Sun, D.; Peng, R.; Lin, S.; Zhang, K.; Jin, L. Transcriptional profiling reveals molecular basis and the role of arginine in response to low-pH stress in Pichia kudriavzevii. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 130, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Villa, S.; Hamideh, M.; Weinstock, A.; Qasim, M.N.; Hazbun, T.R.; Sellam, A.; Hernday, A.D.; Thangamani, S. Transcriptional control of hyphal morphogenesis in Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020, 20, foaa005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schnierda, T.; Bauer, F.F.; Divol, B.; van Rensburg, E.; Gorgens, J.F. Optimization of carbon and nitrogen medium components for biomass production using non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 58, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koutinas, M.; Patsalou, M.; Stavrinou, S.; Vyrides, I. High temperature alcoholic fermentation of orange peel by the newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii KVMP10. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 62, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Radecka, D.; Mukherjee, V.; Mateo, R.Q.; Stojiljkovic, M.; Foulquie-Moreno, M.R.; Thevelein, J.M. Looking beyond Saccharomyces: The potential of non-conventional yeast species for desirable traits in bioethanol fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mateus, D.; Sousa, S.; Coimbra, C.; Rogerson, F.S.; Simoes, J. Identification and characterization of non-saccharomyces species isolated from port wine spontaneous fermentations. Foods 2020, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, W.; Zhuo, X.; Hu, L.; Zhang, X. Effects of crude beta-glucosidases from Issatchenkia terricola, Pichia kudriavzevii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima on the flavor complexity and characteristics of wines. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. del Mónaco, S.M.; Barda, N.B.; Rubio, N.C.; Caballero, A.C. Selection and characterization of a Patagonian Pichia kudriavzevii for wine deacidification. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, D.H.; Hong, Y.A.; Park, H.D. Co-fermentation of grape must by Issatchenkia orientalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces the malic acid content in wine. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, L.X.; Wang, G.Q.; Aihaiti, A. Combined indigenous yeast strains produced local wine from over ripen Cabernet Sauvignon grape in Xinjiang. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.R.; Ma, E.B.; Yan, L.Z.; Meng, H.; Du, X.W.; Quan, Z.X. Bacterial and fungal diversity in the starter production process of Fen liquor, a traditional Chinese liquor. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Tan, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, F.; Chen, L.; Hao, F.; Lv, X.; Du, H.; Xu, Y. Effect of Pichia on shaping the fermentation microbial community of sauce-flavor Baijiu. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 336, 108898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, P.; Xiong, X.; Wang, S.; Miao, L. Population dynamics and metabolite analysis of yeasts involved in a Chinese miscellaneous-flavor liquor fermentation. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 553–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, R.R.; Xu, M.; Zheng, J.; Liu, Y.J.; Sun, C.H.; Wang, H.; Guo, X.W.; Xiao, D.G.; Wu, X.L.; Chen, Y.F. Application potential of Baijiu non-Saccharomyces yeast in winemaking through sequential fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 902597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Du, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Environmental microbiota drives microbial succession and metabolic profiles during Chinese liquor fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02369-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Du, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Exploring the impacts of raw materials and environments on the microbiota in Chinese Daqu starter. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 297, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huang, X.; Fan, Y.; Lu, T.; Kang, J.; Pang, X.; Han, B.; Chen, J. Composition and metabolic functions of the microbiome in fermented grain during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, N.; Du, H.; Xu, Y. Cooperative response of Pichia kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to lactic acid stress in Baijiu fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4903–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Coulibaly, W.H.; Boli, Z.; Bouatenin, K.M.J.; M’Bra, A.A.; Kouhounde, S.H.S.; Dje, K.M. Identification of non-Saccharomyces yeast strains isolated from local traditional sorghum beer produced in Abidjan district (Cote d’Ivoire) and their ability to carry out alcoholic fermentation. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. van Rijswijck, I.M.H.; Wolkers-Rooijackers, J.C.M.; Abee, T.; Smid, E.J. Performance of non-conventional yeasts in co-culture with brewers’ yeast for steering ethanol and aroma production. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1591–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nyanga, L.K.; Nout, M.J.; Gadaga, T.H.; Theelen, B.; Boekhout, T.; Zwietering, M.H. Yeasts and lactic acid bacteria microbiota from masau (Ziziphus mauritiana) fruits and their fermented fruit pulp in Zimbabwe. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, S.; Laaksonen, O.; Marsol-Vall, A.; Zhu, B.; Yang, B. Comparison of volatile composition between alcoholic bilberry beverages fermented with non-Saccharomyces yeasts and dynamic changes in volatile compounds during fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3626–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Di Cagno, R.; Filannino, P.; Cantatore, V.; Polo, A.; Celano, G.; Martinovic, A.; Cavoski, I.; Gobbetti, M. Design of potential probiotic yeast starters tailored for making a cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) functional beverage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 323, 108591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mukisa, I.M.; Byaruhanga, Y.B.; Muyanja, C.; Langsrud, T.; Narvhus, J.A. Production of organic flavor compounds by dominant lactic acid bacteria and yeasts from Obushera, a traditional sorghum malt fermented beverage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, B.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K.; Zhang, X.X.; Mutukumira, A.N. Isolation and characterisation of dominant acetic acid bacteria and yeast isolated from Kombucha samples at point of sale in New Zealand. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bai, M.; Qing, M.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Bao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Sun, T.S. Occurrence and dominance of yeast species in naturally fermented milk from the Tibetan Plateau of China. Can. J. Microbiol. 2010, 56, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lore, T.A.; Mbugua, S.K.; Wangoh, J. Enumeration and identification of microflora in suusac, a Kenyan traditional fermented camel milk product. LWT 2005, 38, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abdelgadir, W.; Nielsen, D.S.; Hamad, S.; Jakobsen, M. A traditional Sudanese fermented camel’s milk product, Gariss, as a habitat of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 127, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Akabanda, F.; Owusu-Kwarteng, J.; Tano-Debrah, K.; Glover, R.L.; Nielsen, D.S.; Jespersen, L. Taxonomic and molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in nunu, a Ghanaian fermented milk product. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Srimahaeak, T.; Petersen, M.A.; Lillevang, S.K.; Jespersen, L.; Larsen, N. Spoilage potential of contaminating yeast species Kluyveromyces marxianus, Pichia kudriavzevii and Torulaspora delbrueckii during cold storage of skyr. Foods 2022, 11, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fleet, G.H. Chapter 5-Yeast Spoilage of Foods and Beverages the Yeasts, 5th ed.; Elseviver: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chaves-Lopez, C.; Tofalo, R.; Serio, A.; Paparella, A.; Sacchetti, G.; Suzzi, G. Yeasts from Colombian Kumis as source of peptides with angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 159, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chaves-Lopez, C.; Serio, A.; Paparella, A.; Martuscelli, M.; Corsetti, A.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Impact of microbial cultures on proteolysis and release of bioactive peptides in fermented milk. Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lavoie, K.; Touchette, M.; St-Gelais, D.; Labrie, S. Characterization of the fungal microflora in raw milk and specialty cheeses of the pro vince of Quebec. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2012, 92, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zheng, X.; Li, K.; Shi, X.; Ni, Y.; Li, B.; Zhuge, B. Potential characterization of yeasts isolated from Kazak artisanal cheese to produce flavoring compounds. Microbiologyopen 2018, 7, e00533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Merchan, A.V.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Vazquez Hernandez, M.; Benito, M.J.; Aranda, E.; Rodriguez, A.; Martin, A. Characterization of autochthonal yeasts isolated from Spanish soft raw ewe milk protected designation of origin cheeses for technological application. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 2931–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiao, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, X.; Deng, L.; Wang, B. Evaluation of the effect of auxiliary starter yeasts with enzyme activities on Kazak cheese quality and flavor. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 614208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, P.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Lu, S.; Li, B. Probiotic potential of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing yeast and its influence on the quality of cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 6559–6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Helmy, E.A.; Soliman, S.A.; Abdel-Ghany, T.M.; Ganash, M. Evaluation of potentially probiotic attributes of certain dairy yeast isolated from buffalo sweetened Karish cheese. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Geronikou, A.; Larsen, N.; Lillevang, S.K.; Jespersen, L. Occurrence and identification of yeasts in production of white-brined cheese. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Garnier, L.; Valence, F.; Mounier, J. Diversity and control of spoilage fungi in dairy products: An update. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Gilberto, V.; Soccol, V.T.; Brar, S.K.; Neto, E.; Soccol, C.R. Microbial ecology and starter culture technology in coffee processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 57, 2775–2788. [Google Scholar]
  55. Elhalis, H.; Cox, J.; Zhao, J. Ecological diversity, evolution and metabolism of microbial communities in the wet fermentation of Australian coffee beans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 321, 108544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elhalis, H.; Cox, J.; Frank, D.; Zhao, J. The crucial role of yeasts in the wet fermentation of coffee beans and quality. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. de Melo Pereira, G.V.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Magalhaes Junior, A.I.; Vasquez, Z.S.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Soccol, C.R. Exploring the impacts of postharvest processing on the aroma formation of coffee beans—A review. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Elhalis, H.; Cox, J.; Frank, D.; Zhao, J. Microbiological and biochemical performances of six yeast species as potential starter cultures for wet fermentation of coffee beans. LWT 2021, 137, 110430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Elhalis, H.; Cox, J.; Frank, D.; Zhao, J. Microbiological and chemical characteristics of wet coffee fermentation inoculated with Hansinaspora uvarum and Pichia kudriavzevii and their impact on coffee sensory quality. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 713969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Krajangsang, S.; Seephin, P.; Tantayotai, P.; Mahingsapun, R.; Meeampun, Y.; Panyachanakul, T.; Samosorn, S.; Dolsophon, K.; Jiamjariyatam, R.; Lorliam, W.; et al. New approach for screening of microorganisms from Arabica coffee processing for their ability to improve Arabica coffee flavor. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Shankar, S.R.; Sneha, H.P.; Prakash, I.; Khan, M.; HN, P.K.; Om, H.; Basavaraj, K.; Murthy, P.S. Microbial ecology and functional coffee fermentation dynamics with Pichia kudriavzevii. Food Microbiol. 2022, 105, 104012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Figueroa-Hernandez, C.; Mota-Gutierrez, J.; Ferrocino, I.; Hernandez-Estrada, Z.J.; Gonzalez-Rios, O.; Cocolin, L.; Suarez-Quiroz, M.L. The challenges and perspectives of the selection of starter cultures for fermented cocoa beans. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 301, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Delgado-Ospina, J.; Triboletti, S.; Alessandria, V.; Serio, A.; Sergi, M.; Paparella, A.; Rantsiou, K.; Chaves-Lopez, C. Functional biodiversity of yeasts isolated from Colombian fermented and dry cocoa beans. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Viesser, J.A.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Favero, G.R.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Goés-Neto, A.; Rogez, H.; Soccol, C.R. Global cocoa fermentation microbiome: Revealing new taxa and microbial functions by next generation sequencing technologies. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Samagaci, L.; Ouattara, H.; Niamké, S.; Lemaire, M. Pichia kudrazevii and Candida nitrativorans are the most well-adapted and relevant yeast species fermenting cocoa in Agneby-Tiassa, a local Ivorian cocoa producing region. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pereira, G.V.M.; Alvarez, J.P.; Neto, D.P.d.C.; Soccol, V.T.; Tanobe, V.O.A.; Rogez, H.; Góes-Neto, A.; Soccol, C.R. Great intraspecies diversity of Pichia kudriavzevii in cocoa fermentation highlights the importance of yeast strain selection for flavor modulation of cocoa beans. LWT 2017, 84, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chagas Junior, G.C.A.; Ferreira, N.R.; Gloria, M.B.A.; Martins, L.; Lopes, A.S. Chemical implications and time reduction of on-farm cocoa fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kudriavzevii. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Delgado-Ospina, J.; Acquaticci, L.; Molina-Hernandez, J.B.; Rantsiou, K.; Martuscelli, M.; Kamgang-Nzekoue, A.F.; Vittori, S.; Paparella, A.; Chaves-Lopez, C. Exploring the capability of yeasts isolated from Colombian fermented cocoa beans to form and degrade biogenic amines in a lab-scale model system for cocoa fermentation. Microorganisms 2020, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moon, S.H.; Chang, M.; Kim, H.Y.; Chang, H.C. Pichia kudriavzevii is the major yeast involved in film-formation, off-odor production, and texture-softening in over-ripened Kimchi. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jeong, C.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Oh, Y.J.; Ko, H.I.; Roh, S.W.; Hong, S.W.; Kwon, H.C.; Han, S.G.; Kim, T.W. Safety assessment of white colony-forming yeasts in kimchi. Food Microbiol. 2022, 106, 104057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ogunremi, O.R.; Sanni, A.I.; Agrawal, R. Probiotic potentials of yeasts isolated from some cereal-based Nigerian traditional fermented food products. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hjortmo, S.B.; Hellstrom, A.M.; Andlid, T.A. Production of folates by yeasts in Tanzanian fermented togwa. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Greppi, A.; Saubade, F.; Botta, C.; Humblot, C.; Guyot, J.P.; Cocolin, L. Potential probiotic Pichia kudriavzevii strains and their ability to enhance folate content of traditional cereal-based African fermented food. Food Microbiol. 2017, 62, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ogunremi, O.R.; Agrawal, R.; Sanni, A.I. Development of cereal-based functional food using cereal-mix substrate fermented with probiotic strain—Pichia kudriavzevii OG. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 3, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Ogunremi, O.R.; Agrawal, R.; Sanni, A. Production and characterization of volatile compounds and phytase from potentially probiotic yeasts isolated from traditional fermented cereal foods in Nigeria. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fernandes, T.; Carvalho, B.F.; Mantovani, H.C.; Schwan, R.F.; Avila, C.L.S. Identification and characterization of yeasts from bovine rumen for potential use as probiotics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Suntara, C.; Cherdthong, A.; Wanapat, M.; Uriyapongson, S.; Leelavatcharamas, V.; Sawaengkaew, J.; Chanjula, P.; Foiklang, S. Isolation and characterization of yeasts from rumen fluids for potential use as additives in ruminant feeding. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Santos, M.C.; Lock, A.L.; Mechor, G.D.; Kung, L., Jr. Effects of a spoilage yeast from silage on in vitro ruminal fermentation. J. Dairy Airy Sci. 2015, 98, 2603–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Suntara, C.; Cherdthong, A.; Uriyapongson, S.; Wanapat, M.; Chanjula, P. Comparison effects of ruminal crabtree-negative yeasts and crabtree-positive yeasts for improving ensiled rice straw quality and ruminal digestion using in vitro gas production. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ji, Y.; Dong, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, W.; Yan, H.; Liu, X. Effects of bovine Pichia kudriavzevii T7, Candida glabrata B14, and Lactobacillus plantarum Y9 on milk production, quality and digestive tract microbiome in dairy cows. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Intanoo, M.; Kongkeitkajorn, M.B.; Pattarajinda, V.; Bernard, J.K.; Callaway, T.R.; Suriyasathaporn, W.; Phasuk, Y. Isolation and screening of aflatoxin-detoxifying yeast and bacteria from ruminal fluids to reduce aflatoxin B1 contamination in dairy cattle feed. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1603–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Magnoli, A.P.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Poloni, V.L.; Rojo, M.C.; Combina, M.; Chiacchiera, S.M.; Dalcero, A.M.; Cavaglieri, L.R. Novel yeast isolated from broilers’ feedstuff, gut and faeces as aflatoxin B1 adsorbents. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 1766–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Magnoli, A.P.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Gonzalez Pereyra, M.L.; Poloni, V.L.; Peralta, M.F.; Nilson, A.J.; Miazzo, R.D.; Bagnis, G.; Chiacchiera, S.M.; Cavaglieri, L.R. Use of yeast (Pichia kudriavzevii) as a novel feed additive to ameliorate the effects of aflatoxin B1 on broiler chicken performance. Mycotoxin Res. 2017, 33, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yuan, S.F.; Guo, G.L.; Hwang, W.S. Ethanol production from dilute-acid steam exploded lignocellulosic feedstocks using an isolated multistress-tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii strain. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Park, H.J.; Bae, J.H.; Ko, H.J.; Lee, S.H.; Sung, B.H.; Han, J.I.; Sohn, J.H. Low-pH production of d-lactic acid using newly isolated acid tolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii NG. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 2232–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Baptista, M.; Domingues, L. Kluyveromyces marxianus as a microbial cell factory for lignocellulosic biomass valorisation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 60, 108027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zainuddin, M.F.; Kar Fai, C.; Mohamed, M.S.; Abdul Rahman, N.; Halim, M. Production of single cell oil by Yarrowia lipolytica JCM 2320 using detoxified desiccated coconut residue hydrolysate. Peer J. 2022, 10, e12833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Konzock, O.; Zaghen, S.; Norbeck, J. Tolerance of Yarrowia lipolytica to inhibitors commonly found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, X.; Qi, Y.; Yan, D.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, L. CgMED3 changes membrane sterol composition to help Candida glabrata tolerate low-pH stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00972-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Martorell, P.; Stratford, M.; Steels, H.; Fernandez-Espinar, M.T.; Querol, A. Physiological characterization of spoilage strains of Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii isolated from high sugar environments. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Toor, M.; Kumar, S.S.; Malyan, S.K.; Bishnoi, N.R.; Mathimani, T.; Rajendran, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. An overview on bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oberoi, H.S.; Babbar, N.; Sandhu, S.K.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Kaur, U.; Chadha, B.S.; Bhargav, V.K. Ethanol production from alkali-treated rice straw via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii HOP-1. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 39, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Choi, D.H.; Park, E.H.; Kim, M.D. Isolation of thermotolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii from nuruk. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1357–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Seong, Y.J.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, S.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Park, Y.C. Physiological and metabolomic analysis of Issatchenkia orientalis MTY1 with multiple tolerance for cellulosic bioethanol production. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Li, C.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, L. Salt stress improves thermotolerance and high-temperature bioethanol production of multi-stress-tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii by stimulating intracellular metabolism and inhibiting oxidative damage. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Isono, N.; Hayakawa, H.; Usami, A.; Mishima, T.; Hisamatsu, M. A comparative study of ethanol production by Issatchenkia orientalis strains under stress conditions. J. Biosci. Bioeng 2012, 113, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Techaparin, A.; Thanonkeo, P.; Klanrit, P. High-temperature ethanol production using thermotolerant yeast newly isolated from Greater Mekong Subregion. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017, 48, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dhaliwal, S.S.; Oberoi, H.S.; Sandhu, S.K.; Nanda, D.; Kumar, D.; Uppal, S.K. Enhanced ethanol production from sugarcane juice by galactose adaptation of a newly isolated thermotolerant strain of Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 5968–5975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zwirzitz, A.; Alteio, L.; Sulzenbacher, D.; Atanasoff, M.; Selg, M. Ethanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate by Issatchenkia orientalis isolated from waste cooking oil. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kwon, Y.J.; Ma, A.Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Zhuang, G.Q.; Liu, C.Z. Effect of lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds on growth and ethanol fermentation of newly-isolated thermotolerant Issatchenkia orientalis. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8099–8104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chamnipa, N.; Thanonkeo, S.; Klanrit, P.; Thanonkeo, P. The potential of the newly isolated thermotolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii RZ8-1 for high-temperature ethanol production. Braz J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 378–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kwon, Y.J.; Wang, F.; Liu, C.Z. Deep-bed solid state fermentation of sweet sorghum stalk to ethanol by thermotolerant Issatchenkia orientalis IPE 100. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 11262–11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Diaz-Nava, L.E.; Montes-Garcia, N.; Dominguez, J.M.; Aguilar-Uscanga, M.G. Effect of carbon sources on the growth and ethanol production of native yeast Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 isolated from sweet sorghum juice. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lavudi, S.; Oberoi, H.S.; Mangamoori, L.N. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse through process optimization using response surface methodology. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nieto-Sarabia, V.L.; Ballinas-Cesatti, C.B.; Melgar-Lalanne, G.; Cristiani-Urbina, E.; Morales-Barrera, L. Isolation, identification, and kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of a Pichia kudriavzevii yeast strain capable of fermentation. Food Bioprod. Process. 2022, 131, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Murata, Y.; Nwuche, C.O.; Nweze, J.E.; Ndubuisi, I.A.; Ogbonna, J.C. Potentials of multi-stress tolerant yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kudriavzevii for fuel ethanol production from industrial cassava wastes. Process. Biochem. 2021, 111, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Patsalou, M.; Samanides, C.G.; Protopapa, E.; Stavrinou, S.; Vyrides, I.; Koutinas, M. A citrus peel waste biorefinery for ethanol and methane production. Molecules 2019, 24, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Akita, H.; Goshima, T.; Suzuki, T.; Itoiri, Y.; Kimura, Z.-i.; Matsushika, A. Application of Pichia kudriavzevii NBRC1279 and NBRC1664 to Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation for Bioethanol Production. Fermentation 2021, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yuangsaard, N.; Yongmanitchai, W.; Yamada, M.; Limtong, S. Selection and characterization of a newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii strain for ethanol production at high temperature from cassava starch hydrolysate. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2013, 103, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nweze, J.E.; Ndubuisi, I.; Murata, Y.; Omae, H.; Ogbonna, J.C. Isolation and evaluation of xylose-fermenting thermotolerant yeasts for bioethanol production. Biofuels 2019, 12, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sunkar, B.; Bhukya, B. Bi-phasic hydrolysis of corncobs for the extraction of total sugars and ethanol production using inhibitor resistant and thermotolerant yeast, Pichia kudriavzevii. Biomass Bioenerg. 2021, 153, 106230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xi, Y.; Zhan, T.; Xu, H.; Chen, J.; Bi, C.; Fan, F.; Zhang, X. Characterization of JEN family carboxylate transporters from the acid-tolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii and their applications in succinic acid production. Microb Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 1130–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rush, B.J.; Fosmer, A.M. Method for Succinate Production. WO2013/112939A3, 2 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  114. Suominen, P.; Aristidou, A.; Penttila, M.; Ilmen, M.; Ruohonen, L.; Koivuranta, K.; Roberg-Perez, K. Genetically Modified Yeast of the Species Issatchenkia orientalis and Closely Related Species, and Fermentation Processes Using Same. U.S. Patent 2009/0226989 A1, 10 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  115. Baek, S.H.; Kwon, E.Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Hahn, J.S. Metabolic engineering and adaptive evolution for efficient production of D-lactic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2737–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Toivari, M.; Vehkomaki, M.L.; Nygard, Y.; Penttila, M.; Ruohonen, L.; Wiebe, M.G. Low pH D-xylonate production with Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 133, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Ji, H.; Xu, K.; Dong, X.; Sun, D.; Jin, L. Sequential Production of ᴅ-xylonate and Ethanol from Non-Detoxified Corncob at Low-pH by Pichia kudriavzevii via a Two-Stage Fermentation Strategy. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sun, W.; Vila-Santa, A.; Liu, N.; Prozorov, T.; Xie, D.; Faria, N.T.; Ferreira, F.C.; Mira, N.P.; Shao, Z. Metabolic engineering of an acid-tolerant yeast strain Pichia kudriavzevii for itaconic acid production. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2020, 10, e00124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Xiao, H.; Shao, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Dole, S.; Zhao, H. Exploiting Issatchenkia orientalis SD108 for succinic acid production. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2014, 13, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Finley, K.R.; Huryta, J.M.; Mastel, B.M.; Mcmullin, T.W.; Poynter, G.M.; Rush, B.J.; Watts, K.T.; Fosmer, A.M.; McIntosh, V.L., Jr.; Brady, K.M. Compositions and methods for succinate production. US20130302866A1, 14 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhuge, J.; Fang, H.Y.; Wang, Z.X.; Chen, D.Z.; Jin, H.R.; Gu, H.L. Glycerol production by a novel osmotolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2001, 55, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Xie, D. Improvement of glycerol production by Candida krusei in batch and continuous cultures using corn steep liquor. Biotechnol. Lett. 2002, 24, 1539–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, G.; Yao, S.; Guan, Y. Influence of osmoregulators on osmotolerant yeast Candida krusei for the production of glycerol. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 14, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Su, Q.; Xie, D. Glycerol production by Candida krusei employing NaCl as an osmoregulator in batch and continuous fermentations. Biotechnol. Lett. 2002, 24, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fan, G.; Cheng, L.; Fu, Z.; Sun, B.; Teng, C.; Jiang, X.; Li, X. Screening of yeasts isolated from Baijiu environments for 2-phenylethanol production and optimization of production conditions. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Martinez-Avila, O.; Munoz-Torrero, P.; Sanchez, A.; Font, X.; Barrena, R. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes by producing 2-phenylethanol via solid-state fermentation: Influence of substrate selection on the process. Waste Manag. 2021, 121, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Martínez-Avila, O.; Sánchez, A.; Font, X.; Barrena, R. 2-phenylethanol (rose aroma) production potential of an isolated Pichia kudriavzevii through solid-state fermentation. Process. Biochem. 2020, 93, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sankh, S.; Thiru, M.; Saran, S.; Rangaswamy, V. Biodiesel production from a newly isolated Pichia kudriavzevii strain. Fuel 2013, 106, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xue, S.J.; Chi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.F.; Liu, G.L.; Jiang, H.; Hu, Z.; Chi, Z.M. Fatty acids from oleaginous yeasts and yeast-like fungi and their potential applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Diwan, B.; Gupta, P. Comprehending the influence of critical cultivation parameters on the oleaginous behaviour of potent rotten fruit yeast isolates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 490–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bettencourt, S.; Miranda, C.; Pozdniakova, T.A.; Sampaio, P.; Franco-Duarte, R.; Pais, C. Single cell oil production by oleaginous yeasts grown in synthetic and waste-derived volatile fatty acids. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ubeda, J.F.; Maldonado, M.; Briones, A.I.; Francisco, J.F. Bio-prospecting of distillery yeasts as bio-control and bio-remediation agents. Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Li, C.; Yu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Ma, H.; Xu, Y. Efficient removal of zinc by multi-stress-tolerant yeast Pichia kudriavzevii A16. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 206, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y. Acid stress induces cross-protection for cadmium tolerance of multi-stress-tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii by regulating cadmium transport and antioxidant defense system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Mesquita, V.A.; Silva, C.F.; Soares, E.V. Toxicity induced by a metal mixture (Cd, Pb and Zn) in the yeast Pichia kudriavzevii: The role of oxidative stress. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Tondee, T.; Sirianuntapiboon, S.; Ohmomo, S. Decolorization of molasses wastewater by yeast strain, Issatchenkia orientalis No. SF9-246. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5511–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pajot, H.F.; Delgado, O.D.; de Figueroa, L.I.; Farina, J.I. Unraveling the decolourizing ability of yeast isolates from dye-polluted and virgin environments: An ecological and taxonomical overview. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2011, 99, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rosu, C.M.; Vochita, G.; Mihasan, M.; Avadanei, M.; Mihai, C.T.; Gherghel, D. Performances of Pichia kudriavzevii in decolorization, biodegradation, and detoxification of C.I. Basic Blue 41 under optimized cultural conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lin, H.; Ye, J.; Sun, W.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zou, P.; Chen, Z.; Ma, J.; Wang, F.; Ma, J. Solar composting greenhouse for organic waste treatment in fed-batch mode: Physicochemical and microbiological dynamics. Waste Mana.g 2020, 113, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nakasaki, K.; Araya, S.; Mimoto, H. Inoculation of Pichia kudriavzevii RB1 degrades the organic acids present in raw compost material and accelerates composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 144, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Nakasaki, K.; Hirai, H. Temperature control strategy to enhance the activity of yeast inoculated into compost raw material for accelerated composting. Waste Manag. 2017, 65, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bleve, G.; Grieco, F.; Cozzi, G.; Logrieco, A.; Visconti, A. Isolation of epiphytic yeasts with potential for biocontrol of Aspergillus carbonarius and A. niger on grape. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 108, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Madbouly, A.K.; Abo Elyousr, K.A.M.; Ismail, I.M. Biocontrol of Monilinia fructigena, causal agent of brown rot of apple fruit, by using endophytic yeasts. Biol. Control 2020, 144, 104239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bajaj, B.K.; Raina, S.; Singh, S. Killer toxin from a novel killer yeast Pichia kudriavzevii RY55 with idiosyncratic antibacterial activity. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Delali, K.I.; Chen, O.; Wang, W.J.; Yi, L.H.; Deng, L.L.; Zeng, K.F. Evaluation of yeast isolates from kimchi with antagonistic activity against green mold in citrus and elucidating the action mechanisms of three yeast: P. kudriavzevii, K. marxianus, and Y. lipolytica. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chi, M.; Li, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Z.; Sui, Y.; Liu, J. Increase in antioxidant enzyme activity, stress tolerance and biocontrol efficacy of Pichia kudriavzevii with the transition from a yeast-like to biofilm morphology. Biol. Control. 2015, 90, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Choinska, R.; Piasecka-Jozwiak, K.; Chablowska, B.; Dumka, J.; Lukaszewicz, A. Biocontrol ability and volatile organic compounds production as a putative mode of action of yeast strains isolated from organic grapes and rye grains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; Yang, H.; Li, L.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zheng, J. Pichia kudriavzevii retards fungal decay by influencing the fungal community succession during cherry tomato fruit storage. Food Microbiol. 2020, 88, 103404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Sun, K.Y.; Wang, Z.W.Z.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Fu, Y.N.; Gao, J.H.; Zhao, X.; Guo, J.; et al. Enhancement of biocontrol efficacy of Pichia kudriavzevii induced by Ca Ascorbate against Botrytis cinerea in cherry tomato fruit and the possible mechanisms of action. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; Castanheira, M.; Jones, R.N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: Results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum. Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Nagarathnamma, T.; Chunchanur, S.K.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Vineetha, K.R.; Ramamurthy, K.; Joseph, J.; Ambica, R. Outbreak of Pichia kudriavzevii fungaemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 1759–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Aslani, N.; Janbabaei, G.; Abastabar, M.; Meis, J.F.; Babaeian, M.; Khodavaisy, S.; Boekhout, T.; Badali, H. Identification of uncommon oral yeasts from cancer patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lortholary, O.; Renaudat, C.; Sitbon, K.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Bretagne, S.; Dromer, F.; French Mycoses Study, G. The risk and clinical outcome of candidemia depending on underlying malignancy. Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Kaur, H.; Shankarnarayana, S.A.; Hallur, V.; Muralidharan, J.; Biswal, M.; Ghosh, A.K.; Ray, P.; Chakrabarti, A.; Rudramurthy, S.M. Prolonged outbreak of Candida krusei candidemia in paediatric ward of tertiary care hospital. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Salehi, M.; Ahmadikia, K.; Mahmoudi, S.; Kalantari, S.; Jamalimoghadamsiahkali, S.; Izadi, A.; Kord, M.; Dehghan Manshadi, S.A.; Seifi, A.; Ghiasvand, F.; et al. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in hospitalised COVID-19 patients from Iran: Species identification and antifungal susceptibility pattern. Mycoses 2020, 63, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Angebault, C.; Djossou, F.; Abelanet, S.; Permal, E.; Ben Soltana, M.; Diancourt, L.; Bouchier, C.; Woerther, P.L.; Catzeflis, F.; Andremont, A.; et al. Candida albicans is not always the preferential yeast colonizing humans: A study in Wayampi Amerindians. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1705–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Domingues Bianchin, M.; Borowicz, S.M.; da Rosa Monte Machado, G.; Pippi, B.; Staniscuaski Guterres, S.; Raffin Pohlmann, A.; Meneghello Fuentefria, A.; Clemes Kulkamp-Guerreiro, I. Lipid core nanoparticles as a broad strategy to reverse fluconazole resistance in multiple Candida species. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 175, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Patriota, L.L.S.; Procópio, T.F.; de Souza, M.F.D.; de Oliveira, A.P.S.; Carvalho, L.V.N.; Pitta, M.G.R.; Rego, M.J.B.M.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Pontual, E.V.; Napoleão, T.H. A Trypsin inhibitor from Tecoma stans Leaves inhibits growth and promotes ATP depletion and lipid peroxidation in Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. International Dairy Federation. Inventory of microbial food cultures with safety demonstration in fermented food products (Bulletin of the IDF n514/2022). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 154, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cao, M.; Fatma, Z.; Song, X.; Hsieh, P.H.; Tran, V.G.; Lyon, W.L.; Sayadi, M.; Shao, Z.; Yoshikuni, Y.; Zhao, H. A genetic toolbox for metabolic engineering of Issatchenkia orientalis. Metab. Eng. 2020, 59, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Tran, V.G.; Cao, M.; Fatma, Z.; Song, X.; Zhao, H. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9-based tool for gene deletion in Issatchenkia orientalis. mSphere 2019, 4, e00345-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Distribution of spontaneously fermented foods involving P. kudriavzevii on a global scale.
Figure 1. Distribution of spontaneously fermented foods involving P. kudriavzevii on a global scale.
Jof 09 00170 g001
Table 1. Overview industrially relevant phenotypes of P. kudriavzevii and other well-studied non-conventional yeasts.
Table 1. Overview industrially relevant phenotypes of P. kudriavzevii and other well-studied non-conventional yeasts.
Non-Conventional YeastsGlucose
(w/v)
Ethanol
(v/v)
Temperature
(°C)
Acetic Acid
(g/L)
Furfural
(g/L)
5-HMF
(g/L)
Low-pHReference
Pichia kudriavzevii48%13%501857 g/L1.5[4,17,84,85]
Kluyveromyces lactis48%10%394-4 g/L-[4]
Kluyveromyces marxianus40%7%521537 g/L2.5[4,17,86]
Yarrowia lipolytica50%5%3052.95 g/L-[4,87,88]
Candida glabrata50%11%41--7 g/L2.0[4,89]
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii70%13 %30--5 g/L2.2[4,90]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, Y.; Li, M.; Jin, J.; Dong, X.; Xu, K.; Jin, L.; Qiao, Y.; Ji, H. Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii in Food and Biotechnology Industries. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020170

AMA Style

Chu Y, Li M, Jin J, Dong X, Xu K, Jin L, Qiao Y, Ji H. Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii in Food and Biotechnology Industries. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(2):170. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Yunfei, Mengmeng Li, Jiahui Jin, Xiameng Dong, Ke Xu, Libo Jin, Yanming Qiao, and Hao Ji. 2023. "Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii in Food and Biotechnology Industries" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 2: 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020170

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop