Next Article in Journal
Epidemiology, Modern Diagnostics, and the Management of Mucorales Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of the Capebp2 Gene Encoding the PEBP-like Protein Promotes the Cap Redifferentiation in Cyclocybe aegerita
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clonal Diversity of Candida auris, Candida blankii, and Kodamaea ohmeri Isolated from Septicemia and Otomycosis in Bangladesh as Determined by Multilocus Sequence Typing

1
Department of Microbiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
2
Department of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
3
Netrokona Medical College, Netrokona 2400, Bangladesh
4
Mugda Medical College, Dhaka 1214, Bangladesh
5
Department of ENT, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
6
Department of Oral Microbiology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
7
Department of Neonatology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
8
Department of Pathology, Netrokona Medical College, Netrokona 2400, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(6), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060658
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 31 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 June 2023 / Published: 12 June 2023

Abstract

:
Candida auris, Candida blankii, and Kodamaea ohmeri have been regarded as emerging fungal pathogens that can cause infections with high mortality. For genotyping of C. auris, a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme based on four locus sequences has been reported, while there is no typing scheme for C. blankii and K. ohmeri. In the present study, the existing MLST scheme of C. auris was modified by adding more locus types deduced from sequence data available in the GenBank database. Furthermore, MLST schemes of C. blankii and K. ohmeri were developed using the four cognate loci (ITS, RPB1, RPB2, D1/D2) and similar sequence regions to those of C. auris. These MLST schemes were applied to identify the ST (sequence type) of clinical isolates of C. auris (n = 7), C. blankii (n = 9), and K. ohmeri (n = 6), derived from septicemia or otomycosis in Bangladesh in 2021. All the C. auris isolates were classified into a single ST (ST5) and clade I, having a Y132F substitution in ERG11p, which is associated with azole resistance. Similarly, all the C. blankii isolates belonged to a single type (ST1). In contrast, six K. ohmeri isolates were assigned to five types (ST1-ST5), suggesting its higher genetic diversity. These findings revealed the availability of MLST schemes for these three fungal species for understanding their clonal diversity among clinical isolates.

1. Introduction

Candida species are the most common fungal pathogens in humans, causing superficial and systemic infections. Among the forms of candidiasis, candidemia is among the leading causes of nosocomial infections, associated with significant mortality, and its incidence has been increasing worldwide in the past few decades [1]. A notable recent trend in epidemiology of Candida is the emergence of novel Candida species such as C. auris [2], and the prevalence of uncommon pathogenic yeast [3], which has been suggested to be due mostly to an increase in immunocompromised patients.
Candida auris is a newly described species that was first isolated from the external ear canal of a patient in Japan in 2009 [4]. Subsequently, the global spread of this species has occurred rapidly [5,6]. However, it has also been noted that the genetically different clades (I through V) of C. auris emerged nearly simultaneously in multiple countries across six continents, for an unknown reason [7]. Bloodstream infection is the most common type of infection by C. auris in children, with a high mortality rate [6]. This species shows high resistance to fluconazole, with variable susceptibility to other antifungals and an increase in multi-drug resistance (MDR) [5,6]. The spread of C. auris with MDR has been recognized as a public health concern in Europe [8] and the Middle East [9], and its sudden increase in prevalence in 2021 was reported in the US [10].
Candida blankii, which was first described in mink in 1968 [11], has been isolated from dairy products. However, since its identification in a neonate with cystic fibrosis in 2015 [12], C. blankii has been considered an emerging human pathogen that primarily infects immunocompromised humans, mostly causing bloodstream infections [3,13,14]. Reduced susceptibility to azoles in this species was reported [15], and an outbreak of fungemia was described in India [16]. Recently, C. blankii bloodstream infection in the elderly was reported as a complication of COVID-19 in the US [17].
Kodamaea ohmeri, a heterotypic synonym of C. guilliermondii var. membranaefaciens, is also regarded as an emerging fungal pathogen, primarily causing fungemia, endocarditis, and onychomycosis [18,19]. Although amphotericin B and fluconazole are commonly used as antifungal therapy, the occurrence of fluconazole resistance is noted [19,20]. Mortality due to K. ohmeri infection is high in cases of fungemia, but low in other infection types. Infections with this species have been found worldwide, with nearly 70% being reported in Asia (particularly East and Southeast Asia) [19].
In Bangladesh, candidemia is estimated to constitute a serious burden, with an estimated 8100 cases per year (5/100,000 rate) [21]. We previously characterized the species and antimicrobial susceptibility of 109 presumptive Candida isolates from 3 infection types in Mymensingh, Bangladesh, and revealed 13 species, including C. auris and K. ohmeri [22]. We describe herein the detection of more isolates of C. auris and K. ohmeri, and the identification of C. blankii, firstly in Bangladesh, among isolates at the same study site. Furthermore, to clarify the clonal diversity, isolates of the three emerging fungal species were analyzed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), based on partial nucleotide sequences of four housekeeping genes.
An MLST scheme of C. auris using four loci (ITS, RPB1, RPB2, and D1/D2) of housekeeping genes was originally proposed by Cendejas-Bueno and coworkers [23]. Using these sequences of the four loci, Prakash and coworkers reported a multilocus phylogenetic analysis of C. auris [24]. Subsequently, employing the sequence data of the same four loci, Kwon et al. [25] designed an MLST scheme in which the locus type was assigned to the sequences, and the sequence type (ST) was assigned to the combination of the four locus types (allelic profiles). This scheme was utilized for 61 Korean isolates, revealing a single ST (ST cluster) among them. However, this MLST analysis for C. auris has not yet been well utilized, and has not been reported for more clinical isolates at other study sites. Furthermore, no MLST scheme has been established for C. blankii and K. ohmeri. In the present study, the MLST scheme of C. auris was improved through the addition of more types of four loci, the sequences of which could be retrieved from the GenBank database. For C. blankii and K. ohmeri, provisional MLST schemes were created, based on the four loci, which are same as those of C. auris, using the sequence data retrieved from the GenBank database. These MLST schemes were applied for genotyping recent clinical isolates of C. auris, C. blankii and K. ohmeri in Bangladesh.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Isolates of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri

In our previous study, clinical isolates of presumptive Candida spp. collected from Mymensingh Medical College hospital, during 10-month period in 2021, were characterized [22]. In the present study, we analyzed additional 22 isolates that were collected in the same period but could not be identified phenotypically, and by the PCR-RFLP method for the ITS region. These isolates were recovered from the blood and aural swabs (discharge) of patients with suspected candidemia and otomycosis, respectively. Isolation of Candida from specimens was performed as described previously [22].
The nucleotide sequence of the ITS region was determined using Sanger sequencing, with PCR products and Candida species universal primers ITS1 and ITS4 [26]. Species were determined by searching for an identical or highly similar sequence in the GenBank database, using the BLAST web tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 20 April 2023). Isolates identified as C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri were further genotyped using MLST schemes.

2.2. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined using the broth microdilution method, as described previously [22]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for fluconazole and amphotericin B. The susceptibility of C. auris to these antifungals was judged according to the criteria defined by the US Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) (https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html, accessed on 26 May 2023).

2.3. MLST Schemes of C. auris, C. blankii and K. ohmeri

MLST was performed according to the procedure described previously by Kwon et al. [25]. In this scheme, partial nucleotide sequences are determined for four loci: the ITS region of the ribosomal subunit, the D1/D2 large ribosomal subunit region, RPB1 encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, and RPB2 encoding the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II. Fungal DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method, and the ITS, D1/D2 regions and RPB1 sequences (i.e., the same sequence regions among the three species) were amplified by PCR, using the primers and conditions described previously [24] (Table 1). For PCR amplification of RPB2, newly designed primers were used for the three species (Table 1). Nucleotide sequences of amplified PCR products were determined via Sanger sequencing on an automated sequencer.
For C. auris, obtained sequence data were collated with those published previously [25] to assign type of each locus. Furthermore, for all the three fungal species, sequences representing different types of the four loci were searched using the BLAST web tool, utilizing the obtained sequence data for the present study isolates. The sequence data of individual allelic types were compared through alignment using the Clustal Omega program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 10 April 2023). Phylogenetic dendrograms of the sequences of four MLST loci were constructed using the maximum likelihood method and MEGA.6 software, together with sequence data available in the GenBank database. ST (sequence type) was assigned to the combination of the four locus types, i.e., the allelic profile.

2.4. Sequence Analysis of ERG11 Gene of C. auris and Clade Typing

The nucleotide sequence of C. auris ERG11 gene was determined as described previously [27]. To detect mutation associated with azole resistance, deduced amino acid sequences were compared with those of the fluconazole-susceptible C. auris strain B11220 (a wild-type strain of clade II, GenBank accession no. XP_028891800) [28]. The major geographical clade of C. auris (I-IV) was determined using clade-specific PCR, as described previously [29].

2.5. GenBank Accession Number

The nucleotide sequences of ITS and D1/D2 regions, RPB1 and RPB2 determined in the present study were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers shown in Table S1.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Fungal Species

The 22 isolates were identified as C. auris (n = 5), C. blankii (n = 9), C. parapsilosis (n = 2), and K. ohmeri (n = 6), using sequencing analysis of the ITS region. Among them, C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri isolates (n = 20) were further analyzed genetically, along with two C. auris isolates that had been reported previously [22]. These total 22 isolates were derived from septicemia (n = 18: 7 C. auris, 8 C. blankii, and 3 K. ohmeri) or otomycosis (n = 4; 1 C. blankii and 3 K. ohmeri).

3.2. MLST Scheme of C. auris

The nucleotide sequences of the four MLST loci were determined for C. auris isolates, and the sequence ranges were adjusted according to those reported previously [25]. Sequences of ITS, RPB1, D1/D2 of all the seven isolates were identical to those of allelic types “b”, “b”, “b” designated by Kwon et al. [25], respectively. The RPB2 sequence was identical among the seven isolates, but did not coincide with those of the alleles “a” or “c”, as described previously [25]. In the present study, the allelic designations using the alphabet (a–c) were converted to Arabic numerals, because the allelic profiles of all the established MLST schemes of the bacterial species and four Candida species are shown as combinations of Arabic numerals (https://pubmlst.org/, accessed on 10 April 2023). Accordingly, four alleles (ITS-RPB1-RPB2-D1/D2) of the present isolates were assigned to 1-1-1-1 (Table 2), and the sequences of the four loci are shown in Tables S2–S5. To assign more allelic types for the C. auris MLST scheme, divergent sequences of the four loci were searched among the GenBank database using the BLAST web tool and the allelic type 1 sequence of the four loci as standards. Allelic type numbers were assigned according to higher frequency, as detected in the GenBank database. Thus, the allelic types of four loci representing divergent sequences were provisionally assigned (Table 2 and Tables S2–S5). Although less than four alleles were found in D1/D2, RPB1, and RPB2, a larger number of divergent sequences were retrieved for ITS. Therefore, in this study, allelic types were assigned to only six sequences of ITS that showed a frequency of two or more in the GenBank database (Table 2). Sequence identities within ITS and D1/D2 loci were somewhat lower (95.19–99.74% and 96.46–99.26%, respectively) than those within RPB1 and RPB2 (≥98.52%) (Table S6). The allelic types of four loci were evidently distinguished by phylogenetic dendrograms (Figure 1).

3.3. MLST Schemes of C. blankii and K. ohmeri

MLST schemes for C. blankii and K. ohmeri were designed using a range of sequences in the four loci which are similar to those of C. auris scheme [25] (Tables S2–S5). As described above, the divergent sequences of the four loci were searched using the BLAST web tool and the sequences obtained in the present isolates; allelic types were assigned as shown in Table 2, and also schematically represented by dendrograms (ITS locus of K. blankii and four loci of K. ohmeri) in Figure 1. For C. blankii, four alleles were identified for ITS, while only one or two alleles were assigned to other loci. In contrast, eight ITS and RPB2 allelic types were found in K. ohmeri, while the ITS region was more divergent (94.52–99.74% identity) than RPB2 (98.69–99.8% identity) (Table S6).

3.4. Assignment of ST for C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri Isolates

To assign ST for isolates of individual species, allelic profiles representing a combination of the four loci (ITS-RPB1-RPB2-D1/D2) were summarized in Table 3. All the C. auris isolates in the present study had a 1-1-1-1 profile, which was assigned to ST5, following ST1 through ST4 (ST cluster), which had been already described [25]. Nine C. blankii isolates exhibited an identical profile of 1-1-2-1, which was indicated by ST1. Six K. ohmeri isolates showed five different allelic profiles, representing ST1 through ST5, due to more diverse allelic types in RPB1 and RPB2. Only two isolates from septicemia belonged to the same type, ST1 (Table 4).

3.5. Characteristics of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri and Their Infections

All the C. auris isolates in the present study were classified into clade I (the South Asia clade), and mostly showed resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B (Table 4). In the ERG11p, all isolates had a Y132F substitution, without a K143R mutation. Except for a case of otomycosis with C. blankii, all the C. auris and C. blankii infections were septicemia that occurred in neonates and was often associated with premature birth, a low birth weight, and an intravenous canula as risk factors. Most septicemia cases with C. auris (6/7), and half of septicemia cases with C. blankii (4/8) were fatal. Two C. blankii isolates showed higher MIC to fluconazole and amphotericin B than other isolates. K. ohmeri infections were septicemia in neonates (n = 3) and otomycosis in adults (n = 3), without a fatal case. Otomycosis due to K. ohmeri was recurrent and associated with chronic suppurative otitis media. Three isolates from otomycosis showed higher MIC to fluconazole than blood isolates. The two infection types were caused by different STs of K. ohmeri.

4. Discussion

In our previous study, C. auris and K. ohmeri were genetically confirmed in a few among 109 isolates of presumptive Candida species in Bangladesh [22]. However, in the present study, further characterization of those remaining among the same batch of isolates revealed the presence of more isolates of these species, and C. blankii was first confirmed in Bangladesh. Consequently, C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri were identified at a rate of approximately 6% each (8–9 among a total 131 isolates), accounting for nearly 20% of the total Candida-like yeast isolates. Particularly, C. auris and C. blankii were isolated from fatal septicemia, and K. ohmeri was associated with recurrent otomycosis as well as neonatal septicemia. These findings underscore the importance of identification of the three emerging species as fungal pathogens in Bangladesh. However, these species might have been underestimated or not recognized, because they are easily misidentified as other Candida species using biochemical testing [2,5,16,18]. Therefore, sequencing analysis of the ITS region should be employed for notable cases, both for appropriate therapeutic management and epidemiological study.
C. auris isolates in the present study were revealed to be a single clone belonging to ST5 (locus profile, 1-1-1-1) and clade I (South Asia clade), having an identical substitution in ERG11p (Y132F). The similar single clonality of C. auris was reported in Korea for 61 isolates from different sources and hospitals over a 10-year period [25]. These isolates belonged to ST2 (locus profile, 2-2-2-2) and were grouped into clade II (East Asia clade), and associated with a low incidence of the ERG11p substitution. Taken together, these findings using MLST indicated the distinctive nature of C. auris in global regions (represented by clades), and the single clonality of isolates at each study site. The distinction of isolates from South Asia and East Asia was also described using a phylogenetic analysis of the C. auris gene sequence (a concatenated sequence of four MLST loci), revealing cluster 1 (India, South Africa), cluster 2 (Korea and Japan), and cluster 3 (Brazil) [24]. Similarly, MLST-based phylogenetic analysis showed the differentiation of clades I-III among global isolates [30], and the distinction between South African isolates and Korean isolates [31].
Kwon and coworkers also analyzed ten C. auris strains representing each of four clades, provided by the US CDC, using the MLST scheme, and showed that ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4 correspond to clade I, II, III, and IV, respectively [25]. However, in our present study, all the C. auris isolates in Bangladesh, which belonged to clade I, were assigned to ST5. This difference in the ST of clade I may imply a diversity of clones within a clade. In addition, the ST1 CDC isolate AR0382 had no mutation in Erg11p [25], unlike our ST5 isolates. Therefore, it is suggested that the C. auris strains of clade I may have evolved, presumably through exposure to antifungal agents, while a single C. auris clone is distributed throughout a region/country.
In the present study, in Bangladesh, C. blankii was first identified, and the isolates were revealed to comprise a single clone (ST1), causing 50% of fatal cases among septicaemia. Although MLST was not available previously, a single clonal origin of C. blankii isolates was described in a study in Delhi, India, as revealed by an amplified fragment length polymorphism pattern [16]. These isolates were derived from fungemia in neonates (with a case fatality rate of 45%), showing similar observations to our study, which suggests a prevalence of C. blankii in South Asia. Although limited information is available on this subject, human infections due to C. blankii have been reported in South Asia, Brazil, Argentina, Kuwait, Iran, and India [13,14,15,16,17,32,33]. Therefore, South Asia appears to be one of the global hotspots of the prevalence of C. blankii. Indian C. blankii isolates, which were collected mostly in 2016, were all susceptible to fluconazole [16]. However, in our study, two among nine C. blankii isolates (22%) showed higher MICs to fluconazole and amphotericin B, causing fatal outcomes. Additionally, in Kuwait, fluconazole-resistant C. blankii was reported to cause a fatal bloodstream infection in a neonate [13]. These findings suggest the occurrence of a mutation associated with azole resistance in C. blankii, as observed for C. auris. Therefore, the prevalence and spread of azole resistance in C. blankii should be also carefully monitored.
In contrast to C. auris and C. blankii, the K. ohmeri isolated in our present study was genetically divergent, as defined by ST, despite the small number of isolates. The isolates were derived from septicemia in children and otomycosis in adults, with the latter showing higher MICs to fluconazole. This species has been isolated from patients with various types of infections and background, with fungemia in neonates and elderly being dominant [18,19]. Although molecular epidemiological information is not available for K. ohmeri isolates, it is suggested that the wide range of infection types may be related to potentially higher genomic diversity, which might allow adaptation to various human body sites and tissues. This point may be further understood using genotypic analysis of K. ohmeri, depending on the infection type and/or host attributes. ST1 was assigned to two isolates from bloodstream infection in a neonate and in an infant, which may suggest an association of this type with septicemia. Though five STs were identified for the present K. ohmeri isolates, the D1/D2 locus was only assigned to a single type (type 1). This may imply that this locus type is the one prevalent in Bangladesh, or has higher conservation in D1/D2 than other loci within this species.
To date, MLST schemes of Candida have been established for four species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis), employing seven loci (C. albicans) or six loci (other species) [34,35,36,37]. According to the PubMLST website (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/, accessed on 29 April 2023), >4000 types of C. albicans, and >1400 types of C. tropicalis were registered, but there are still <300 types for C. krusei and C. glabrata. In the present study, we modified the existing MLST scheme of C. auris [25], and designed new MLST schemes of C. blankii and K. ohmeri based on the C. auris scheme with four loci. With these MLST schemes, we identified only a single ST for C. auris and C. blankii, and five STs for K. ohmeri. The lesser variety in identified STs in the present study may be due to the limited numbers of clinical isolates available for the analysis, and also possibly to the less divergent nature of these species within a single study site. However, there are many sequences representing various locus types of the four loci that could be retrieved from GenBank, and many of these types were not assigned to the present isolates in Bangladesh. Therefore, the presence of numerous STs may actually be estimated for global isolates. To evaluate the discrimination ability and usefulness of the MLST schemes for the epidemiological study of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri, the accumulation of more sequence data from clinical isolates will be necessary. Above all, because the sequence data of C. blankii are substantially lacking, it is essential to have medical professionals recognize the presence of this emerging species to facilitate its genetic identification in clinical laboratories. For this, the spread of accurate identification of Candida species using sequencing of ITS region is necessary.
A limitation of the present study is that short tandem repeat (STR) typing was not performed for C. auris [38] because we focused on the design and application of MLST schemes for the three fungal species. STR typing has been applied for the genotyping of C. auris as a rapid and reliable method with high discrimination ability [39]. Therefore, a comparison of MLST with STR would be also of significance for the development of the molecular epidemiology of C. auris.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9060658/s1. Table S1: GenBank accession numbers of ITS, D1/D2, RPB1, and RPB2 sequences determined in this study; Table S2: Nucleotide sequences of ITS locus; Table S3: Nucleotide sequences of RPB1 locus; Table S4: Nucleotide sequences of RPB2 locus; Table S5: Nucleotide sequences of D1/D2 locus; Table S6: Sequence identity among alleles of ITS, RPB1, RPB2, and D1/D2 locus of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A.S., S.K.P. and N.K.; methodology, F.A.S. and M.S.A.; investigation, F.A.S., M.S.A. and N.K.; resources, N.H., S.R., S.A., M.M.A., S.K., M.A.R. and J.P.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.S., M.S.A. and N.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K.; supervision, S.K.P. and S.A.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mymensingh Medical College (MMC/IRB/2021/390).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects or guardians involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Falagas, M.E.; Roussos, N.; Vardakas, K.Z. Relative frequency of albicans and the various non-albicans Candida spp among candidemia isolates from inpatients in various parts of the world: A systematic review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, e954–e966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Chowdhary, A.; Sharma, C.; Meis, J.F. Candida auris: A rapidly emerging cause of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant fungal infections globally. PLOS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, S.; Kumar, A.; Roudbary, M.; Mohammadi, R.; Černáková, L.; Rodrigues, C.F. Overview on the Infections Related to Rare Candida Species. Pathogens 2022, 11, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, S.; Alfouzan, W. Candida auris: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Infection Control Measures to Combat the Spread of Infections in Healthcare Facilities. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ashkenazi-Hoffnung, L.; Rosenberg Danziger, C. Navigating the New Reality: A Review of the Epidemiological, Clinical, and Microbiological Characteristics of Candida auris, with a Focus on Children. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Du, H.; Bing, J.; Hu, T.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Geremia, N.; Brugnaro, P.; Solinas, M.; Scarparo, C.; Panese, S. Candida auris as an Emergent Public Health Problem: A Current Update on European Outbreaks and Cases. Healthcare 2023, 11, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alfouzan, W.; Dhar, R.; Albarrag, A.; Al-Abdely, H. The emerging pathogen Candida auris: A focus on the Middle-Eastern countries. J. Infect. Public Health 2019, 12, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lyman, M.; Forsberg, K.; Sexton, D.J.; Chow, N.A.; Lockhart, S.R.; Jackson, B.R.; Chiller, T. Worsening Spread of Candida auris in the United States, 2019 to 2021. Ann. Intern. Med. 2023, 176, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buckley, H.R.; van Uden, N. Five new Candida species. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1968, 36, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaragoza, S.; Galanternik, L.; Vazquez, M.; Teper, A.; Córdoba, S.; Finquelievich, J. 318 Candida blankii: New agent in cystic fibrosis airways? J. Cyst. Fibros. 2015, 14, S140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al-Haqqan, A.; Al-Sweih, N.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L.; Varghese, S.; Khan, Z. Azole-resistant Candida blankii as a newly recognized cause of bloodstream infection. New. Microbes New. Infect. 2018, 26, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kollu, V.S.; Kalagara, P.K.; Islam, S.; Gupte, A. A Report of Candida blankii Fungemia and Possible Endocarditis in an Immunocompetent Individual and the Review of Literature. Cureus 2021, 13, e14945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nobrega de Almeida, J., Jr.; Campos, S.V.; Thomaz, D.Y.; Thomaz, L.; de Almeida, R.K.; Del Negro, G.M.; Gimenes, V.F.; Grenfell, R.C.; Motta, A.L.; Rossi, F.; et al. Candida blankii: An emergent opportunistic yeast with reduced susceptibility to antifungals. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2018, 7, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chowdhary, A.; Stielow, J.B.; Upadhyaya, G.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, A.; Meis, J.F. Candida blankii: An emerging yeast in an outbreak of fungaemia in neonates in Delhi, India. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 648.e5–648.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mirchin, R.; Czeresnia, J.M.; Orner, E.P.; Chaturvedi, S.; Murphy, K.; Nosanchuk, J.D. The Continuing Emergence of Candida blankii as a Pathogenic Fungus: A New Case of Fungemia in a Patient Infected with SARS-CoV-2. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ioannou, P.; Papakitsou, I. Kodamaea ohmeri infections in humans: A systematic review. Mycoses 2020, 63, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, M.; Li, Y.; Kudinha, T.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Z. Kodamaea ohmeri as an Emerging Human Pathogen: A Review and Update. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 736582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, B.H.; Peng, M.Y.; Hou, S.J.; Sun, J.R.; Lee, S.Y.; Lu, J.J. Fluconazole-resistant Kodamaea ohmeri fungemia associated with cellulitis: Case report and review of the literature. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 13, e493–e507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gugnani, H.C.; Denning, D.W.; Rahim, R.; Sadat, A.; Belal, M.; Mahbub, M.S. Burden of serious fungal infections in Bangladesh. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sathi, F.A.; Paul, S.K.; Ahmed, S.; Alam, M.M.; Nasreen, S.A.; Haque, N.; Islam, A.; Nila, S.S.; Afrin, S.Z.; Aung, M.S.; et al. Prevalence and Antifungal Susceptibility of Clinically Relevant Candida Species, Identification of Candida auris and Kodamaea ohmeri in Bangladesh. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cendejas-Bueno, E.; Kolecka, A.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Theelen, B.; Groenewald, M.; Kostrzewa, M.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Gómez-López, A.; Boekhout, T. Reclassification of the Candida haemulonii complex as Candida haemulonii (C. haemulonii group I.), C. duobushaemulonii sp. nov. (C. haemulonii group II), and C. haemulonii var. vulnera var. nov.: Three multiresistant human pathogenic yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 3641–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Prakash, A.; Sharma, C.; Singh, A.; Singh, P.K.; Kumar, A.; Hagen, F.; Govender, N.; Colombo, A.; Meis, J.; Chowdhary, A. Evidence of genotypic diversity among Candida auris isolates by multilocus sequence typing, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and amplified fragment length polymorphism. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 277.e1–277.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kwon, Y.J.; Shin, J.H.; Byun, S.A.; Choi, M.J.; Won, E.J.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.Y.; Chun, S.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, H.J.; et al. Candida auris Clinical Isolates from South Korea: Identification, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01624–e016318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chowdhary, A.; Prakash, A.; Sharma, C.; Kordalewska, M.; Kumar, A.; Sarma, S.; Tarai, B.; Singh, A.; Upadhyaya, G.; Upadhyay, S.; et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009-17) in India: Role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muñoz, J.F.; Gade, L.; Chow, N.A.; Loparev, V.N.; Juieng, P.; Berkow, E.L.; Farrer, R.A.; Litvintseva, A.P.; Cuomo, C.A. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Narayanan, A.; Selvakumar, P.; Siddharthan, R.; Sanyal, K. ClaID: A Rapid Method of Clade-Level Identification of the Multidrug Resistant Human Fungal Pathogen Candida auris. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0063422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pfaller, M.A.; Messer, S.A.; Deshpande, L.M.; Rhomberg, P.R.; Utt, E.A.; Castanheira, M. Evaluation of Synergistic Activity of Isavuconazole or Voriconazole plus Anidulafungin and the Occurrence and Genetic Characterization of Candida auris Detected in a Surveillance Program. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e02031–e2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Magobo, R.; Mhlanga, M.; Corcoran, C.; Govender, N.P. Multilocus sequence typing of azole-resistant Candida auris strains, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 35, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Becker, L.B.; Dalla Lana, D.F.; Mezzari, A. Candida blankii: An emerging pathogen difficult to diagnose and to treat clinically. Clin. Biomed. Res. 2019, 39, 341–345. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Ahmadkhani, F.; Golrizi, M.B.; Khodavaisy, S.; Ghazvini, R.D. Candida Blankii Candidemia an Emerging Threat. Iran. J. Public Health 2022, 52, 208–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bougnoux, M.E.; Tavanti, A.; Bouchier, C.; Gow, N.A.; Magnier, A.; Davidson, A.D.; Maiden, M.C.; d’Enfert, C.; Odds, F.C. Collaborative consensus for optimized multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5265–5266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dodgson, A.R.; Pujol, C.; Denning, D.W.; Soll, D.R.; Fox, A.J. Multilocus sequence typing of Candida glabrata reveals geographically enriched clades. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5709–5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jacobsen, M.D.; Gow, N.A.; Maiden, M.C.; Shaw, D.J.; Odds, F.C. Strain typing and determination of population structure of Candida krusei by multilocus sequence typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tavanti, A.; Davidson, A.D.; Johnson, E.M.; Maiden, M.C.; Shaw, D.J.; Gow, N.A.; Odds, F.C. Multilocus sequence typing for differentiation of strains of Candida tropicalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5593–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. De Groot, T.; Puts, Y.; Berrio, I.; Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.F. Development of Candida auris Short Tandem Repeat Typing and Its Application to a Global Collection of Isolates. mBio 2020, 11, e02971-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. De Groot, T.; Spruijtenburg, B.; Parnell, L.A.; Chow, N.A.; Meis, J.F. Optimization and Validation of Candida auris Short Tandem Repeat Analysis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0264522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic dendrograms of four MLST loci of C. auris and K. ohmeri, and ITS locus of C. blankii, constructed using the maximum likelihood method with the MEGA.6 program. Sequences determined in the present study for Bangladeshi isolates are marked with a filled circle. Other sequences include those of individual locus types defined in Table 2, and those representing each locus type retrieved from GenBank database are indicated with accession numbers. Trees were statistically supported by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates, and genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model. The variation scale is presented at the bottom. Locus type numbers are shown in brackets on the right of the dendrogram with vertical bars.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic dendrograms of four MLST loci of C. auris and K. ohmeri, and ITS locus of C. blankii, constructed using the maximum likelihood method with the MEGA.6 program. Sequences determined in the present study for Bangladeshi isolates are marked with a filled circle. Other sequences include those of individual locus types defined in Table 2, and those representing each locus type retrieved from GenBank database are indicated with accession numbers. Trees were statistically supported by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates, and genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model. The variation scale is presented at the bottom. Locus type numbers are shown in brackets on the right of the dendrogram with vertical bars.
Jof 09 00658 g001
Table 1. Primers used for MLST of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri, and mutation analysis of C. auris ERG11 gene.
Table 1. Primers used for MLST of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri, and mutation analysis of C. auris ERG11 gene.
SpeciesTargetPrimer NameSequence (5′-3′) [Orientation]Reference
C. auris, C. blankii, K. ohmeriITS region, ribosomal subunitITS-1TCCGTAGGTGAACCTTGCGG [+][24]
ITS-4TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC [-]
D1/D2, large ribosomal subunit regionNL-1GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG [+][24]
NL-4GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG [-]
RPB1, largest subunit of RNA polymerase IIRPB1afGARTGYCCDGGDCAYTTYGG [+][24]
RPB1CrCCNGCDATNTCRTTRTCCATRTA [-]
C. auris, K. ohmeriRPB2, DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II subunitRPB2-5FaGACGATAGAGATCACTTTGG [+]This study
RPB2-7CraCCCATAGCTTGCTTACCCAT [-]
C. blankiiCanBk-RPB2-F1TCGTATGCTTCTAGTGGCTC [+]
CanBk-RPB2-R1GGACATGGTATCCATACGAAC [-]
C. aurisERG11CauErg11FGTGCCCATCGTCTACAACCT [+][27]
CauErg11RTCTCCCACTCGATTTCTGCT [-]
Table 2. Assignment of allele type numbers (four MLST loci) of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri and frequency of allelic sequences in GenBank database.
Table 2. Assignment of allele type numbers (four MLST loci) of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri and frequency of allelic sequences in GenBank database.
C. auris Locus (Nucleotide Length)
ITS (376–379 nt.)RPB1 (621nt.)RPB2 (1014 nt.)D1/D2 (536–540 nt.)
type *1GenBank accession no.*2Frequency *3type *1GenBank accession no. *2Frequency *3type *1GenBank accession no. *2Frequency *3type *1GenBank accession no. *2Frequency *3
1 [b]MK294583551 [b]KY751739391CP043531401 [b]MK29456855
2 [a]MK308751122 [a]MK30877662 [a]MK29459722 [a]MK29456735
3 [c]MK29458673 [c]MK29461633 [c]KY75183333 [c]MK69687522
4OP1076238 4CP04344334CP0506762
5MN5427494
6MT9746812
C. blankii locus (Nucleotide Length)
ITS (445–446 nt.)RPB1 (633 nt.)RPB2 (1004 nt.)D1/D2 (582 nt.)
typeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.Frequency
1LT993736101EU34409011JQ69900411MF9401403
2MT8199812 2OQ603332 †12KY1063261
3MT1028111
4OM4636281
K. ohmeri Locus (Nucleotide Length)
ITS (382–385 nt.)RPB1 *4 (674 nt.)RPB2 *4 (989 nt.)D1/D2 (526 nt.)
typeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.FrequencytypeGenBank accession no.Frequency
1MT482661151SKFK0100002041JQ69897041MN26877229
2EF190229142JACFYO01000000112MT22228612MK4146382
3KC907715133JACFYP01000000113SKFK0100000713FJ6279572
4LC413234124OQ603326 †14JACFYO01000000914OP9195202
5MK39414465OQ603327 †15JACFYP0100000091
6MN96666146OQ603328 †16OQ603333 †1
7KP13234937OQ603329 †17OQ603335 †1
8MW6172902 8OQ603336 †1
*1 Allele ID is shown as Arabic numerals. Parenthesis indicates allele designation descrived by Kwon et al. [25]. Allelic sequence identified in only one accession number in GenBank database (frequency, one) was omitted for all the loci of C. auris, and ITS and D1/D2 loci of K. ohmeri. Sequences of individual loci of the three species are show in Supplementary Tables S2–S5. *2 One representative accession number is shown. † Accession no. obtained in the present study (frequency is shown as one). *3 Frequency indicates total number of the identical sequence with the same nucleotide length in GenBank database that was explored by BLAST search (as of March 2023). *4 Region of sequence from whole genome database: SKFK01000020, complement (41023..41696); JACFYO010000001, complement (17147..17820); JACFYP010000001, 2121625..212229; 8SKFK01000007, complement (1573048..1574036); JACFYO010000009, complement (422694..423682); JACFYP010000009, complement (422420..423408).
Table 3. STs identified for C. auris, C. blankii and K. ohmeri isolates in this study.
Table 3. STs identified for C. auris, C. blankii and K. ohmeri isolates in this study.
SpeciesAllelic ProfileSTNo. of Isolates
ITSRPB1RPB2D1/D2
C. auris11115 *7
C. blankii112119
K. ohmeri141112
146121
167131
278141
451151
* Kwon et al. [25] described C. auris STs (ST clusters) 1-4 for following allelic profiles (ITS-RPB1-RPB2-D1/D2): ST1, 1-1-2-1 (b-b-a-b); ST2, 2-2-2-2 (a-a-a-a); ST3, 1-1-2-2 (b-b-a-a); ST4, 3-3-3-3 (c-c-c-c). ST5 was assigned in the present study.
Table 4. Genotype and antifungal susceptibility, and patient information of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri isolates.
Table 4. Genotype and antifungal susceptibility, and patient information of C. auris, C. blankii, and K. ohmeri isolates.
SpeciesIsolate IDSTC. auris cladeFluconazoleAmphotericin BPatient
MIC (μg/mL)Susceptibility *1MIC (μg/mL)Susceptibility *1Age/SexSpecimenSymptomRisk Factor *2Outcome
C. aurisC2/1175I1S0.5S6 day/FbloodsepticaemiaPT, LBW, PRAB, IVCrevovered
C3/1475I64R2R15 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPT, LBW, PRAB, IVC, TPN, PROMdeceased
C6/2395I32R2R30 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPT, LBW, PRAB, IVCdeceased
C11/3385I64R4R2 day/MbloodsepticaemiaHBdeceased
C13/3405I32R4R1 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPT, LBWdeceased
C14/3425I32R4R22 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPRAB, IVCdeceased
C16/3445I16S4R2 day/MbloodsepticaemiaLBW, PTdeceased
C. blankiiC9/3361 64N/A4N/A3 day/MbloodsepticaemiaHBdeceased
C12/3391 64N/A4N/A3 day/FbloodsepticaemiaPT, LBWdeceased
C18/1791 2N/A4N/A14 y/Faural swabotomycosisPRABrecurrence
C20/1821 2N/A1N/A10 day/MbloodsepticaemiaLBW, PRAB, IVCrecovered
C21/3451 2N/A1N/A12 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPRAB, IVCrecovered
C22/3461 2N/A1N/A13 day/MbloodsepticaemiaPRAB, IVCNI *3
C23/3471 2N/A1N/A6 day/FbloodsepticaemiaLSCS, PT, PRAB, IVCrecovered
C24/3491 2N/A1N/A6 day/FbloodsepticaemiaHB, PT, LBW, PROMdeceased
C25/3501 2N/A1N/A14 day/MbloodsepticaemiaHB, PT, LBWdeceased
K. ohmeriC8/3321 2N/A0.25N/A10 month/FbloodsepticaemiaPRABrecovered
C10/3371 2N/A0.25N/A1 day/Mbloodsepticaemia recovered
C1/192 64N/A0.25N/A40 y/Faural swabotomycosisDMrecurrence
C5/1853 64N/A2N/A42 y/Faural swabotomycosisCSOMrecurrence
C7/2944 2N/A0.25N/A10 day/Mbloodsepticaemia recovered
C4/1525 64N/A0.25N/A60 y/Faural swabotomycosisCSOM, DMrecurrence
*1 Abbreviations: S, susceptible; R, resistant; N/A, not applicable. *2 Abbreviations: CSOM, chronic suppurative otitis media; DM, diabetes mellitus; HB, home birth; IVC, intravenous canula; LBW, low birth weight; LSCS, lower segment caesarean section; PRAB, prolonged antibiotic use (>7 days); PROM, premature rupture of membrane; PT, preterm; TPN, total parenteral nutrition. *3 No information was available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sathi, F.A.; Aung, M.S.; Paul, S.K.; Nasreen, S.A.; Haque, N.; Roy, S.; Ahmed, S.; Alam, M.M.; Khan, S.; Rabbany, M.A.; et al. Clonal Diversity of Candida auris, Candida blankii, and Kodamaea ohmeri Isolated from Septicemia and Otomycosis in Bangladesh as Determined by Multilocus Sequence Typing. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060658

AMA Style

Sathi FA, Aung MS, Paul SK, Nasreen SA, Haque N, Roy S, Ahmed S, Alam MM, Khan S, Rabbany MA, et al. Clonal Diversity of Candida auris, Candida blankii, and Kodamaea ohmeri Isolated from Septicemia and Otomycosis in Bangladesh as Determined by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(6):658. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060658

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sathi, Fardousi Akter, Meiji Soe Aung, Shyamal Kumar Paul, Syeda Anjuman Nasreen, Nazia Haque, Sangjukta Roy, Salma Ahmed, Mohammad Monirul Alam, Shahed Khan, Mohammad Arif Rabbany, and et al. 2023. "Clonal Diversity of Candida auris, Candida blankii, and Kodamaea ohmeri Isolated from Septicemia and Otomycosis in Bangladesh as Determined by Multilocus Sequence Typing" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 6: 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060658

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop