Next Article in Journal
First Report on Choanephora cucurbitarum Causing Choanephora Rot in Chenopodium Plants and Its Sensitivity to Fungicide
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Acetylome Analysis of Differentially Modified Proteins in Virulence-Differentiated Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum Isolates during Cucumber Colonization
Previous Article in Journal
High-Throughput Screening of the Repurposing Hub Library to Identify Drugs with Novel Inhibitory Activity against Candida albicans and Candida auris Biofilms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trehalase Inhibitor Validamycin May Have Additional Mechanisms of Toxicology against Rhizoctonia cerealis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Four New Species of Small-Spored Alternaria Isolated from Solanum tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in China

1
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
MARA Key Laboratory of Sustainable Crop Production in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(9), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090880
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 27 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fusarium, Alternaria and Rhizoctonia: A Spotlight on Fungal Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Small-spored Alternaria species have been frequently isolated from diseased leaves of Solanum plants. To clarify the diversity of small-spored Alternaria species, a total of 118 strains were obtained from leaf samples of S. tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in six provinces of China during 2022–2023. Based on morphological characterization and multi-locus phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer of the rDNA region (ITS), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF1), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (RPB2), Alternaria major allergen gene (Alt a 1), endopolygalacturonase gene (EndoPG) and an anonymous gene region (OPA10-2), seven species were determined, including four novel species and three known species (A. alternata, A. gossypina and A. arborescens). The novel species were described and illustrated as A. longxiensis sp. nov., A. lijiangensis sp. nov., A. lycopersici sp. nov. and A. solanicola sp. nov.. In addition, the pathogenicity of the seven species was evaluated on potato leaves. The species exhibited various aggressiveness, which could help in disease management.

1. Introduction

The plants of the Solanaceae family are widely cultivated worldwide and have significant economic, medicinal and ornamental values. There are approximately 115 species belonging to 25 genera in China [1,2,3]. For example, potatoes, peppers, tomatoes, eggplants, tobacco, etc. are important cash crops. Solanum is the largest genus, including more than 2000 plants including potato and tomato. (http://www.iplant.cn/) (accessed on 5 July 2023) As the fourth most important crop after rice, wheat and maize, potato (S. tuberosum) has become a staple food in many European countries because of its high nutritional value, rich in starch as well as protein, multivitamins and trace elements [4,5,6]. China’s potato acreage and its total production have consistently held a leading position in the world [7,8]. Tomato (S. lycopersicum) is a popular fruit and vegetable containing abundant vitamin C, cultivated all over the world [9]. Tomato fruit can be eaten raw, cooked, in processed ketchup, juice and so on, whose plant can also be used as potted ornamentals [10]. Moreover, it has great medicinal properties, of which lycopene, a powerful antioxidant may protect against cardiovascular disease and some cancers [11].
The two Solanum crops are susceptible to fungal pathogen infection during their cultivation, which severely threatens their yield and quality [12,13]. Especially for Alternaria spp., they are widely distributed with a great impact on economic returns of crops. When encountering favorable conditions, it can cause serious yield reduction or even no harvest [14,15]. Alternaria foliar disease caused by large-spored Alternaria species has been frequently reported from section (sect.) Porri comprising A. solani, A. blumeae, A. linariae, A. grandis and A. protenta infecting both potatoes and tomatoes [14,16]. Another type of Alternaria, small-spored Alternaria has been detected in a large number of the sampled leaves [17]. On potato, A. alternate (syn. A. tenuissima, A. dumosa and A. interrupta), A. arborescens and A. longipes in sect. Alternaria have been reported [5,17,18]. Most of the small-spored Alternaria species on tomato are A. alternata, A. arborescens and A. tomato [11,19]. In addition, A. infectoria in sect. Infectoriae is also often encountered from both plants [10,18].
Accurate identification methods are essential for the taxonomy of small-spored Alternaria. The morphological taxonomy is primarily based on the morphological traits of conidia and sporulation patterns [20,21]. Since the 20th century, molecular approaches have been utilized to identify Alternaria species [22,23,24,25]. At present, species identification based on multi-locus phylogenetic analysis has been applied as a powerful classification tool to assist morphological taxonomy, which has resulted in a combination of both approaches to determine these species [20,26,27,28].
During a survey of small-spored Alternaria species in China, the conidia continue to be discovered on diseased leaf samples of potato and tomato. The pre-test of the species diversity on both Solanum plants revealed four novel species and three known species (A. alternata, A. gossypina and A. arborescens). The aim of this study was to describe those four new taxa according to morphological traits and multi-locus phylogenetic analysis. In addition, the pathogenicity comprising the known species was evaluated on potato here.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation

Symptomatic samples of potato and tomato resembling Alternaria leaf spot or blight were randomly collected from 6 provinces in 2022–2023 (Table 1). The samples were preserved in sterile plastic bags and taken to laboratory for further isolation. The leaf fragments from edge of the lesions were cut and placed on moist filter papers in Petri dishes and incubated at 25 °C in dark forsporulation. Single spore was picked using a sterile glass needle under a stereomicroscope and inoculated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA: Difco, Montreal, Canada). Strains were kept into test-tube slants stored at 4 °C in the Fungal Herbarium of Yangtze University (YZU), Jingzhou, Hubei, China.

2.2. Morphology and Culture Characteristics

Strains representing each species were selected and cultured on PDA at 25 °C in dark for 7 days to determine the cultural features. To confirm the conidial morphology (conidial size, shape, sporulation patterns, etc.), fresh fungal mycelia were transferred onto potato carrot agar (PCA) and V8 juice agar (V8A) media, and then incubated at 22 °C with 8 h light/16 h dark period [21]. After 7 days, conidia and sporulation patterns were examined and photographed with a Nikon Eclipse Ni-U microscope system (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Fifty randomly selected conidia were measured for each strain.

2.3. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelium scraped from colonies on PDA using the CTAB method described in Watanabe et al. [29]. There were seven gene regions including internal transcribed spacer of the rDNA region (ITS), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF1), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (RPB2), Alternaria major allergen gene (Alt a 1), endopolygalacturonase (EndoPG) gene and an anonymous gene region (OPA10-2) used for phylogenic analyses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were performed with the primer pairs of ITS5/ITS4 [30], gpd1/gpd2 [31], EF1-728F/EF1-986R [32], RPB2-5F/RPB2-7cR [33], Alt-for/Alt-rev [23], PG3/PG2b [34] and OPA10-2L/OPA10-2R [34], respectively. The PCR reaction was performed in a 25 μL volume containing 21 μL 1.1× Taq PCR Star Mix (TSINGKE, Beijing, China), 2 μL template DNA, and 1 μL of each primer. The amplified program for PCR amplifications was referenced from Woudenberg et al. [20]. Then, successful amplified products were purified and sequenced by TSINGKE company (Beijing, China). The sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 15 May 2023) and the accession numbers are shown in Table 2.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

The resulting sequences were checked by the BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [35] and primarily aligned using the program of PHYDIT v.3.2 [36]. Phylogenetic analysis of RPB2 gene for all strains was performed for pre-test. Then, each of ITS, GAPDH, TEF1, RPB2, Alt a 1, EndoPG and OPA10-2 gene sequences was analyzed by BLAST search in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 15 May 2023). Their relevant sequences were downloaded from the GenBank database. All gene sequences were spliced and edited through manual processing in MEGA v.7.0 [37]. The multi-locus phylogenetic trees were constructed based on Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses.
The ML analyses were performed using RAxML v.7.2.8 [38] using the GTRCAT model and bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. MrModeltest v.2.3 [39] used the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to determine the best-fit model (GTR + I + G) of nucleotide substitution, which was used for the Bayesian analyses performed with MrBayes v. 3.1.2 [40]. The analyses of two simultaneous Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains were run from random trees for 10, 000, 000 generations and sampled every 100th generations. The first 25% of the samples were discarded. Finally, the resulting trees were edited in FigTree v.1.3.1. [41]. Branch support of the analysis (>60%/0.6 for ML bootstrap value-BS/posterior probability-PP) was indicated in the phylogram.

2.5. Pathogenicity Tests

Twelve representative strains were selected to determine the pathogenicity of those present identified species, among which the four new species did not induce symptoms on tomato according to pre-tests except potato. Hence, the local grown potato cultivars were transplanted in pots and grown in greenhouse (25 °C, 12 h light period) for two weeks used for the experiment. The Alternaria strains were cultured on PDA at 25 °C for 3–5 days, and a 6 mm diameter disc was obtained from the colony edges and inoculated on healthy living leaves sterilized with 70% ethanol in the same greenhouse. The disease development was observed daily. After 7 days, the developed symptoms were recorded and the disease lesion size (LS) was measured. Control experiments were carried out simultaneously using clean PDA discs. For each strain, two potato plants were used and three sites were inoculated for each plant. To maintain the accuracy of the results, potato leaves of the same growing period with uniform size were selected for each test. The treatment was conducted four times. To complete Koch’s postulates, the same inoculated Alternaria was successfully reisolated from their induced symptoms for morphology identification and RPB2 gene sequence analysis. The LS values were the mean value of four replicates ± standard deviation. The least significant difference test (p < 0.05) was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 for analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

A total of 118 small-spored Alternaria strains were obtained according to morphological traits. The preliminary RPB2 gene sequence analysis showed that all strains belonged to sect. Alternaria, of which 88.13% was A. alternata and the others appeared as six taxa with different culture characteristics. Two strains of A. alternata and strains of the six taxa were further determined using the other six gene loci. Phylogenetic analysis included 88 strains from sect. Alternaria (Table 2), which comprised both reference strains and the present strains. The analysis was based on a combined ITS, GAPDH, TEF1, RPB2, Alt a 1, OPA10-2 and EndoPG sequence dataset, which included 494, 501, 215, 596, 437, 627 and 442 characters after alignment, respectively. Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392) from sect. Alternantherae was chosen as the outgroup taxon. The BI and ML analyses exhibited similar topologies. The ML tree was used as the basal tree (Figure 1). The result was similar to the RPB2 gene phylogram. Four selected strains were well merged into the clades of three known Alternaria species, A. alternata, A. arborescens and A. gossypina, supported with PP/BS values of 0.97/79, 0.99/99 and 0.95/98, respectively. The other eight strains fell into four well independent clades supported with 0.99–1.00 PP values and 99–100% BP values, close to A. orobanches and A. ovoidea [42,43] in a branch supported with 0.80/73 PP/BS values. The results indicate that the four clades represent four new species.
Table 2. Alternaria strains used in this study and their GenBank accession numbers (The present strains in bold).
Table 2. Alternaria strains used in this study and their GenBank accession numbers (The present strains in bold).
SpeciesStrainHost/SubstrateCountryGenBank Accession Number
ITSGAPDHTEF1RPB2Alt a 1EndoPGOPA10-2
A. alternantheraeCBS 124392Solanum melongenaChinaKC584179KC584096KC584633KC584374KP123846
A. alternataCBS 916.96 TArachis hypogaeaIndiaAF347031AY278808KC584634KC584375AY563301JQ811978KP124632
CBS 119399Minneola tangeloUSAKP124361KP124063KP125137JQ646328KP123910KP124829KP124672
CBS 102604Minneola tangeloIsraelKP124334AY562410KP125110KP124802AY563305KP124035KP124643
CBS 102602Minneola tangeloTurkeyKP124332KP124187KP125108KP124800KP123881AY295023KP124641
CBS 102599Minneola tangeloTurkeyKP124330KP124185KP125106KP124798KP123879KP124032KP124639
CBS 102595Citrus jambhiriUSAFJ266476AY562411KC584666KC584408AY563306KP124029KP124636
CBS 127672Astragalus bisulcatusUSAKP124382KP124234KP125160KP124852KP123930KP124086KP124695
CBS 103.33SoilEgyptKP124302KP124159KP125077KP124770KP123852KP123999KP124607
CBS 102.47Citrus sinensisUSAKP124303KP124160KP125079KP124772KP123854KP124001KP124609
CBS 117.44Godetia sp.DenmarkKP124303KP124160KP125079KP124772KP123854KP124001KP124609
CBS 102596Citrus jambhiriUSAKP124328KP124183KP125104KP124796KP123877KP124030KP124637
CBS 918.96Dianthus chinensisUKAF347032AY278809KC584693KC584435AY563302KP124026KP124633
CBS 121455Broussonetia papyriferaChinaKP124368KP124220KP125146KP124838KP123916KP124072KP124681
CBS 121547Pyrus bretschneideriChinaKP124372KP124224KP125150KP124842KP123920KP124076KP124685
CBS 127671Stanleya pinnataUSAKP124381KP124233KP125159KP124851KP123929KP124085KP124694
CBS 106.34Linum usitatissimumUnknownY17071JQ646308KP125078KP124771KP123853KP124000KP124608
CBS 121336Allium sp.USAKJ862254KJ862255KP125141KP124833KJ862259KP124067KP124676
CBS 119543Citrus paradisiUSAKP124363KP124215KP125139KP124831KP123911KP124065KP124674
CBS 195.86Euphorbia esulaCanadaKP124317KP124173KP125093KP124785JQ646398KP124017KP124624
YZU 221086Solanum tuberosumChinaOR437981OR462188OR455803OR462192OR455821OR455823OR455847
YZU 221102Solanum tuberosumChinaOR437980OR462187OR455802OR462191OR455820OR455822OR455846
CBS 479.90Citrus unshiuJapanKP124319KP124174KP125095KP124787KP123870KP124019KP124626
A. arborescensCBS 101.13Peat soilSwitzerlandKP124392KP124244KP125170KP124862KP123940KP124096KP124705
CBS 119545 TSenecio skirrhodonNew ZealandKP124409KP124260KP125187KP124879KP123956KP124113KP124723
CBS 119544 TAvena sativaNew ZealandKP124408JQ646321KP125186KP124878KP123955KP124112KP124722
CBS 112749Malus domesticaSouth AfricaKP124402KP124254KP125180KP124872KP123949KP124106KP124716
CBS 105.24Solanum tuberosumUnknownKP124393KP124245KP125171KP124863KP123941KP124097KP124706
CBS 126.60WoodUKKP124397KP124249KP125175KP124867JQ646390KP124101KP124710
CBS 109730Solanum lycopersicumUSAKP124399KP124251KP125177KP124869KP123946KP124103KP124713
CBS 105.49Contaminant blood cultureItalyKP124396KP124248KP125174KP124866KP123944KP124100KP124709
YZU 221451Solanum tuberosumChinaOR435100OR270928OR270930OR462190OR455819OR270925OR270924
A. baoshanensisMFLUCC 21-0124 TCurcubita moschataChinaMZ622003OK236706OK236613OK236659OK236760
MFLU 21-0296Curcubita moschataChinaMZ622004OK236707OK236612OK236660OK236759
A. betae-kenyensisCBS 118810Beta vulgaris var. ciclaKenyaKP124419KP124270KP125197KP124888KP123966KP124123KP124733
A. breviconidiophoraMFLUCC 21-0786 TDigitalis sp.ItalyMZ621997OK236698OK236604OK236651OK236751
MFLU 21-0317Digitalis sp.ItalyMZ621998OK236699OK236605OK236652OK236752
A. burnsiiCBS 118816Rhizophora mucronataIndiaKP124423KP124273KP125201KP124892KP123970KP124127KP124737
CBS 118817Tinospora cordifoliaIndiaKP124424KP124274KP125202KP124893KP123971KP124128KP124738
A. eichhorniaeCBS 489.92 TEichhornia crassipesIndiaKC146356KP124276KP125204KP124895KP123973KP124130KP124740
A. ellipsoidialisMFLUCC 21-0132 TBrassica sp.ItalyMZ621989OK236690OK236596OK236643OK236743
MFLU 21-0307ABrassica sp.ItalyMZ621990OK236691OK236597OK236644OK236744
A. eupatoriicolaMFLUCC 21-0122 TEupatorium cannabinumItalyMZ621982OK236683OK236589OK236636OK236736
MFLU 21-0319Eupatorium cannabinumItalyMZ621983OK236684OK236589OK236637OK236737
A. falcataMFLUCC 21-0123 TAtriplex sp.ItalyMZ621992OK236693OK236599OK236649OK236746
MFLU 21-0306Atriplex sp.ItalyMZ621993OK236694OK236600OK236650OK236747
A. gaisenCBS 632.93 RPyrus pyrifoliaJapanKC584197KC584116KC584658KC584399KP123974AY295033KP124742
CBS 118488 RPyrus pyrifoliaJapanKP124427KP124278KP125206KP124897KP123975KP124132KP124743
A. gossypinaCBS 104.32 TGossypium sp.ZimbabweKP124430KP124135KP125209JQ646312JQ646395KP124900KP124746
CBS 102597Minneola tangeloUSAKP124432KP124281KP125211KP124902KP123978KP124137KP124748
CBS 102601Minneola tangeloColombiaKP124433KP124282KP125212KP124903KP123979KP124138KP124749
YZU 221455Solanum tuberosumChinaOR435098OR270927OR270929OR462189OR455818OR270926OR270923
A. iridiaustralisCBS 118486 TIris sp.AustraliaKP124435KP124284KP125214KP124905KP123981KP124140KP124751
CBS 118487Iris sp.AustraliaKP124436KP124285KP125215KP124906KP123982KP124141KP124752
A. jacinthicolaCBS 133751 TEichhornia crassipesMaliKP124438KP124287KP125217KP124908KP123984KP124143KP124754
CBS 878.95Arachis hypogaeaMauritiusKP124437KP124286KP125216KP124907KP123983KP124142KP124753
A. lijiangensisYZU 221458Solanum tuberosumChinaOQ679970OQ686785OQ686783OQ686789OQ686781OQ686779OQ686787
YZU 221459Solanum tuberosumChinaOQ679971OQ686786OQ686784OQ686790OQ686782OQ686780OQ686788
A. longipesCBS 540.94Nicotiana tabacumUSAAY278835KP124147KC584667AY278811AY563304KC584409KP124758
CBS 121333 RNicotiana tabacumUSAKP124444KP124150KP125223KP124293KP123990KP124914KP124761
A. longxiensisYZU 221221Solanum tuberosumChinaOQ534546OQ512732OQ512726OQ543009OQ473629OQ512720OQ543003
YZU 221222Solanum tuberosumChinaOQ534547OQ512731OQ512725OQ543008OQ473628OQ512719OQ543002
A. lycopersiciYZU 221185Solanum lycopersicumChinaOQ519795OQ512736OQ512730OQ543013OQ473633OQ512724OQ543007
YZU 221186Solanum lycopersicumChinaOQ519794OQ512735OQ512729OQ543012OQ473632OQ512723OQ543006
A. macroconidiaMFLUCC 21-0134 TSpartium junceumItalyMZ622001OK236704OK236610OK236657OK236757
MFLU 21-0301Spartium junceumItalyMZ622002OK236705OK236611OK236658OK236758
A. minimisporaMFLUCC 21-0127 TCitrullus lanatusThailandMZ621980OK236681OK236587OK236634OK236734
MFLU 21-0318Citrullus lanatusThailandMZ621981OK236682OK236588OK236635OK236735
A. muriformisporaMFLUCC 21-0784 TPlantago sp.ItalyMZ621976OK236677OK236583OK236630OK236730
MFLU 21-0309Plantago sp.ItalyMZ621977OK236678OK236584OK236631OK236731
A. obpyriconidiaMFLUCC 21-0121 TVicia fabaItalyMZ621978OK236680OK236585OK236633OK236732
MFLU 21-0300Vicia fabaItalyMZ621979OK236679OK236586OK236632OK236733
A. orobanchesMFLUCC 21-0137 TOrobanche sp.ItalyMZ622007OK236710OK236763
MFLU 21-0303Orobanche sp.ItalyMZ622008OK236711OK236764
A. ovoideaMFLUCC 21-0782 TDactylis glomerataItalyMZ622005OK236708OK236614OK236661OK236761
MFLU 21-0298Dactylis glomerataItalyMZ622006OK236709OK236615OK236662OK236762
A. phragmiticolaMFLUCC 21-0125 TPhragmites sp.ItalyMZ621994OK236696OK236602OK236649OK236749
MFLU 21-0136Phragmites sp.ItalyMZ621995OK236697OK236603OK236650OK236750
A. rostroconidiaMFLUCC 21-0136 TArabis sp.ItalyMZ621969OK236670OK236576OK236623OK236723
MFLU 21-0299Arabis sp.ItalyMZ621970OK236671OK236577OK236624OK236724
A. salicicolaMFLUCC 22-0072 TSalix albaRussiaMZ621999OK236700OK236606OK236653OK236753
MFLU 21-0320Salix albaRussiaMZ622000OK236701OK236607OK236654OK236754
A. solanicolaYZU 221189Solanum lycopersicumChinaOQ534548OQ512734OQ512728OQ543011OQ473631OQ512722OQ543005
YZU 221190Solanum lycopersicumChinaOQ519793OQ512733OQ512727OQ543010OQ473630OQ512721OQ543004
A. tomatoCBS 114.35Solanum lycopersicumUnknownKP124446KP124295KP125225KP124916KP123992KP124152KP124763
CBS 103.30Solanum lycopersicumUnknownKP124445KP124294KP125224KP124915KP123991KP124151KP124762
A. torilisMFLUCC 21-0133Torilis arvensisItalyMZ621986OK236687OK236593OK236640OK236740
MFLU 21-0299Torilis arvensisItalyMZ621987OK236689OK236595OK236642OK236742

3.2. Morphology

The morphological characteristics were measured and compared (Table 3), which was consistent with the result of multi-loci analysis. The four new species (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5) are illustrated and described.

3.3. Taxonomy

Alternaria lycopersici Y.N. GOU & J.X. Deng, sp. nov. YZU 221186 (Figure 2)
MycoBank No.: 848427
Etymology: Named after the host species name, Solanum lycopersicum.
Typification: China, Hubei Province, Jingzhou City, from leaf spot of Solanum lycopersicum, 1 July 2022, J.X. Deng, (YZU-H-2022047, holotype), ex-type culture YZU 221186.
Description: Colonies on PDA circular, light cottony and buff in the center, villiform with white at the edge, 44–45.3 mm in diam., at 25 °C for 7 days. On PCA, conidiophores arising from substrate or lateral of aerial hyphae, cylindrical, straight or curved, septate, pale brown; 28–58(–68.5) × 3–5 μm (av.: 42 × 4 μm); conidia 2–4 units per chain, yellow-brown to light olive green with almost smooth-walled, straight, clavate, long ellipsoid or ovoid, 18–41 × 9.5–13 μm (av.: 31× 11 μm), 1–7 transverse septa, 0–2(−3) longitudinal septa, with an apical 1-cell secondary conidiophore (beak) around 3.5–8 μm in length. On V8A, conidiophores straight or curved, smooth–walled, septate, 26.5–59(−67) × 3.5–5 μm (av.: 41 × 4 μm), conidia 2–4 units in a chain, medium yellow-brown to light olive green, almost smooth ellipsoid or ovoid, 18.5–42.5 × 9–14 μm (av.: 30 × 9.5 μm), 2–7 transverse septa, 0–2(−3) longitudinal septa, with a small apical beak (3.5–8 μm long).
Notes: Based on the combined dataset of ITS, GAPDH, TEF1, RPB2, Alt a 1, EndoPG and OPA10-2 gene fragments, the results reveal that the strains fall in an individual well-supported clade representing a new species, which is closer to A. longxiensis sp. nov. and A. solanicola sp. nov., near to A. orobanches. After a nucleotide pairwise comparison, the present species can be readily differentiated from the other two related novel species based on Alt a 1, RPB2 and OPA10-2 gene regions, which has 21 bp differences in the Alt a 1 region, 17 bp in RPB2 and 19 bp in OPA10-2 when compared with A. longxiensis.
For A. solanicola sp. nov., there are 18 bp nucleotide differences in Alt a 1 region, 16 bp in RPB2 and 20 bp in the OPA10-2 region. Morphologically, its conidia are smallest, clavate and clearly smooth-walled with shorter apical beaks compared to the other two new species. (Figure 2, Table 3).
Figure 2. Morphology of A. lycopersici sp. nov.: (a) Diseased samples in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores; (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Figure 2. Morphology of A. lycopersici sp. nov.: (a) Diseased samples in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores; (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Jof 09 00880 g002
Alternaria solanicola Y.N. GOU & J.X. Deng, sp. nov. YZU 221190 (Figure 3)
MycoBank No.: 848426
Etymology: Named after the host genus names, Solanum lycopersicum.
Typification: China, Hubei Province, Jingzhou City, from leaf spot of Solanum lycopersicum, 1 July 2022, J.X. Deng, (YZU-H-2022048, holotype), ex-type culture YZU 221190.
Description: Colonies on PDA circular, pistac, with white in the center, ivory in reverse; 55.1– 56.6 mm in diam., at 25 °C for 7 days. On PCA, conidiophores arising from substrate, straight or curved, smooth-walled, septate, brown; 20.5–52 (–67) × 3–5 μm (av.: 38.5 × 3.5 μm); conidia 2–4 units per chain, pale to dark brown, almost smooth-walled, short to long ovoid or ellipsoid, 22–44 × 9–16.5 μm (av.: 32× 12 μm), 1–6 transverse septa, 0–2 longitudinal septa, without or with beak around 6–26.5 μm in length. On V8A, conidiophores straight to slightly curved, smooth-walled, septate, brown, 22–51.5(–65) × 3–5 μm (av.: 37 × 4 μm); conidia 2–4 units in a chain, yellow to dark brown, almost smooth-walled, short to long ovoid or ellipsoid, 22–43.5 × 9–16 μm (av.: 32.5 × 11.5 μm), 1–6 transverse septa, 0–2(−3) longitudinal septa, beakless or with an apical beak (7–26 μm long).
Notes: The species is phylogenetically recognized as a distinct species that forms a subclade with A. longxiensis sp. nov. in a branch containing A. lycopersici sp. nov. and A. orobanches. On the bases of the RPB2, OPA10-2 and Alt a 1 gene sequences, this species, respectively, comprises 3 bp, 20 bp and 18 bp nucleotide differences from A. longxiensis. According to morphology, it can be differentiated from A. longxiensis by producing conidia with longer beaks and fewer septa and by comprising fewer spore units in a chain with 1–2 branches. (Figure 3, Table 3).
Figure 3. Morphology of A. solanicola sp. nov.: (a) Diseased samples from field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (f) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). (g) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C) Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eg) = 25 μm.
Figure 3. Morphology of A. solanicola sp. nov.: (a) Diseased samples from field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (f) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). (g) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C) Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eg) = 25 μm.
Jof 09 00880 g003
Alternaria longxiensis Y.N. GOU & J.X. Deng, sp. nov. YZU 221222 (Figure 4)
MycoBank No.: 848428
Etymology: Named after the collecting locality, Longxi (Gansu, China).
Typification: China, Gansu Province, Dingxi City, from leaf spot of Solanum tuberosum, 1 July 2022, J.X. Deng, (YZU-H-2022055, holotype), ex-type culture YZU 221222.
Description: Colonies on PDA circular, light cottony and white to off-white in the center, villiform with white at the edge, reverse dark brown in the center, white at edges, 61.5–62.5 mm in diam., at 25 °C for 7 days. On PCA, conidiophores arising from substrate, simple, straight or flexuous, septate, light to dark brown; 25.5–67(–89.5) × 3–5.5 μm (av.: 46.5 × 4 μm); conidia 2–6 units per chain, medium yellow-brown to brown, short to long ellipsoid, or narrow-ovoid to ovoid, 22.5–51 × 8.5–17 μm (av.: 34 × 11 μm), 1–7 transverse septa, 1–2(−3) longitudinal septa, with an apical beak around 6–18.5 μm in length. On V8A, conidiophores straight or flexuous, septate, light to dark brown, 23–65.5(−87) × 3.5–5 μm (av.: 46 × 3.5 μm), conidia 2–6 units in a chain, medium yellow-brown to brown, short to long ellipsoid, or narrow-ovoid to ovoid, 22–51(–57) × 10–17.5 μm (av.: 35 × 14 μm), 1–7 transverse septa, 1–2(−3) longitudinal septa, with beak of 6–26.5 μm long.
Notes: For this species, the phylogenetic analysis shows that it is quite close to A. solanicola sp. nov. by grouping together in a well-supported subclade (PP/BS = 0.99/96). Morphologically, it produces larger conidia with shorter beaks and a longer conidial chain, when compared with A. solanicola sp. nov.. (Figure 4, Table 3).
Figure 4. Morphology of A. longxiensis sp. nov.: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Figure 4. Morphology of A. longxiensis sp. nov.: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Jof 09 00880 g004
Alternaria lijiangensis YZU 221459 Y.N. GOU & J.X. Deng, sp. nov. (Figure 5)
MycoBank No.: 848429
Etymology: Named after the collecting locality, Lijiang City.
Typification: China, Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, from leaf spot of Solanum tuberosum, 7 Octorber 2022, J.X. Deng, (YZU-H-2022096, holotype), ex-type culture YZU 221459.
Description: Colonies on PDA circular, flocculent with white in the center, light yellow at margins, reverse dark brown in the center, 48.9–50.0 mm in diam., at 25 °C for 7 days. On PCA, conidiophores arising from substrate or lateral of aerial hyphae, straight or curved, septate, pale brown; 21.5–69 × 3–5 μm (av.: 43.5 × 4 μm); conidia 3–7 units per chain, yellow brown to dark brown, ovate, elliptic or ovoid to obpyriform, 25.5–45 × 10–15.5 μm (av.: 33 × 12.5 μm), 1–5 transverse septa, 0–2 longitudinal septa, with an apical extension (beak) around 5–40 μm. On V8A, conidiophores straight or curved, septate, 22–67 × 3.5–5 μm (av.: 44 × 3.5 μm), conidia 3–7 units in a chain, brown to dark brown, ovate, elliptic or ovoid to obpyriform, 22.5–44.5 × 11–15 μm (av.: 31.5 × 13 μm), 1–5 transverse septa, 0–2 longitudinal septa, with obtuse beak of 5–40 μm long.
Notes: Phylogenetic analysis shows that the species falls into an independent lineage sister to the A. orobanches, A. ovoidea and three new species. Morphologically, it can be easily distinguished from the relevant species by producing conidia with the longest beak (up to 40 μm). (Figure 5, Table 3).
Figure 5. Morphology of A. lijiangensis sp. nov.: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Figure 5. Morphology of A. lijiangensis sp. nov.: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c,d) Sporulation patterns; (e,f) Conidiophores (g) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C; (h) Conidia (on V8A at 22 °C). Bars: (c,d) = 50 μm; (eh) = 25 μm.
Jof 09 00880 g005

3.4. Pathogenicity Assays

Pathogenicity tests indicated that the seven small-spored Alternaria species (A. alternata, A. arborescens, A. gossypina, A. lycopersici, A. solanicola, A. longxiensis and A. lijiangensis) of sect. Alternaria were all pathogenic to S. tuberosum and showed varying degrees of pathogenicity. No symptoms were observed in the controls. (Figure 6, Table 4) After three days, black spots began to appear on the leaves and gradually expand, accompanied by yellow halos. Strains of A. lijiangensis exhibited the most severe symptom with LS up to 30.5 mm (av. = 27.5) resulting in a whole dark brown leaf wilting. The disease severity was followed by A. gossypina (LS up to 24 mm) and A. arborescens with LS around 18 to 20 mm, and then A. longxiensis sp. nov., A. lycopersici sp. nov., and A. solanicola sp. nov.. The weakest pathogenicity on potato was A. alternata among all the tested species.

4. Discussion

Simmons dedicates to the morphological taxonomy of Alternaria using a life time. A total of 276 species are comprehensively illustrated based on sporulation patterns and conidial morphology, comprising 128 small-spored Alternaria species [21]. With the continuous research on the taxonomy of small-spored Alternaria aided with molecular approach, the sect. Alternaria is one of the largest sections containing 11 species and one species complex [20], of which A. alternata includes 35 morph-species described by Simmons [21]. There are 27 new species latterly defined as new members of sect. Alternaria [27,42,43,45]. In this study, four novel species (A. lycopersici sp. nov., A. solanicola sp. nov., A. longxiensis sp. nov. and A. lijiangensis sp. nov.) were as found in China and added in the section.
Phylogenetically, nine commonly used genetic regions (SSU, LSU, ITS, GADPH, RPB2, TEF1, Alt a1, EndoPG, and OPA10-2) have been used for the delamination of species within sect. Alternaria [46,47,48]. Among them, the RPB2 gene is considered as a nuclear gene with the advantages of being single-copy and having a slow evolutionary rate. It is capable of effectively distinguishing species for both large-spored and small-spored type [49,50], and is also applicable for the identification of other pathogenic fungi [51]. In this present study, seven gene loci without SSU and LSU were performed and clearly separated the four new taxa. In addition, the RPB2 gene was again confirmed for the ability of fungal classification, which resulted in similar consequences to distinguish the present seven Alternaria species (Figure 1). The present novel species fell into four independent clades together with A. orobanches and A. ovoidea, which were isolated from Orobanche sp. and Dactylis glomerata in Italy, respectively [42,43].
Morphologically, these four new species can be distinguished by their conidia and sporulation patterns. Among them, A. lijiangensis has conidia with the longest beaks among the four present novel species and its relevant species, A. orobanches and A. ovoidea. The other three new species had their own characteristics and could be differentiated with A. orobanches and A. ovoidea by sporulation pattern (more conidial units per chain). (Table 3) For example, conidia of A. lycopersici has a shorter apical cell secondary conidiophore (beak); conidia of A. longxiensis has a longer beak; A. solanicola has 1–2 branches near the main chain. The results indicated the correlation between morphology and molecular composition, and also stated the usefulness of morphological traits (conidial morphology and sporulation pattern) described by Simmons [20] for the taxonomy of small-spored Altenraria.
The large-spored A. solani and A. linariae, are considered to be the primary pathogen of foliar disease in the Solanaceae family [14,44,52], but small-spored Alternaria are also frequently isolated from symptomatic tissues worldwide. Nabahat et al. [17] found that species within sect. Alternaria were dominant populations in Solanaceae plants during their isolation process, accounting for more than 90% of isolated Alternaria strains, which is similar to the reports in the United States and Russia [18,53,54]. In addition to those four new small-spored Alternaria, three known species on potatoes, A. alternata, A. gossypina and A. arborescens, were also discovered (Table 1), of which A. alternata was a common species found on both hosts, detected in 91.21% on potato and 85.18% on tomato. A. gossypina has been commonly reported as the primary pathogen of leaf spot in cotton [55,56], but has not been found on potatoes worldwide, which is firstly found on potato (Figure S1, Table 3). A. arborescens is frequently reported worldwide on Solanaceae [57,58]. However, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first record on potato in China (Figure S2, Table 3).
For the pathogenicity tests (Figure 6, Table 4), A. lijiangensis sp. nov. showed the most severe symptoms with the LS up to 30.5 mm, which was found in Lijiang, Yunnan Province. Then, the A. gossypina was indicated to be the second most aggressive to potatoes (LS up to 24 mm), followed by A. arborescens, A. longxiensis sp. nov. and A. lycopersici sp. nov. and A. solanicola sp. nov.. Compared to the above species, A. alternata were weakest in pathogenicity. In addition, pathogenicity tests of the four new species were also conducted on detached and living tomato leaf with non-pathogenicity, but they exhibited a certain level of aggressiveness on potatoes. The two species from tomato, A. lycopersici sp. nov. and A. solanicola sp. nov. were not pathogenic to their host. It might be because both species were saprophytic or weakly pathogenic facing a resistant tomato variety when conducting the pre-test. According to Zheng et al. [5], A. tenuissima, A. alternata and A. solani are the main pathogens for the Alternaria foliar diseases on potato in China. According to previous study, it is better to be referred A. tenuissima as A. alternata [20]. The present finding showed that a diverse set of small-spored Alternaria species induced various symptoms on potato in China, which might be due to the changing climatic conditions [59,60]. The results indicated that small-spored Alternaria had a potential to threaten our potato production. Nabahat et al. [17] mentioned that A. alternata and A. arborescens could induce leaf blight and spot diseases on tomato and potato; when co-infected with moderately aggressive isolates of A. linariae, synergistic interactions might also occur. Thus, more samples will be collected nationally and more studies will be continued to help field disease management.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9090880/s1, Figure S1: Morphology of A. gossypina: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c, d) Sporulation patterns; (e) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C). Bars: c–d = 100 μm; e = 25 μm. Figure S2: Morphology of A. arborescens: (a) Diseased leaves in field; (b) Colony phenotypes (on PDA for 7 days at 25 °C); (c, d) Sporulation patterns; (e) Conidia (on PCA at 22 °C). Bars: c–d = 100 μm; e = 25 μm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G. and J.D.; methodology, Y.G. and J.D.; software, S.L.L.A.; validation, Y.G., S.L.L.A. and Z.G.; formal analysis, Y.G. and S.L.L.A.; Investigation: Z.G., Z.L. and S.S.; data curation, Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.G. and J.D.; visualization, Y.G. and S.L.L.A.; supervision, J.D.; project administration, J.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was given by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. (No. 31400014 and No. 32270022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences newly generated in this study have been submitted to the GenBank database.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xiao-Yue Dou for providing the leaf samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, H. Investigation in Solanaceae Plant Resources and Evaluation of Landscape Application. Master’s thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Olmstead, R.G.; Bohs, L. A Summary of Molecular Systematic Research in Solanaceae: 1982–2006. Acta Hortic. 2007, 745, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, H.; Li, Y.; He, L.F. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in Solanaceae plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 123, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van Dingenen, J.; Hanzalova, K.; Abd Allah Salem, M.; Abel, C.; Seibert, T.; Giavalisco, P.; Wahl, V. Limited nitrogen availability has cultivar-dependent effects on potato tuber yield and tuber quality traits. Food Chem. 2019, 288, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zheng, H.H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, T.Y.; Wu, X.H. Characterization of Alternaria species associated with potato foliar diseases in China. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Artsaenko, O.; Kettig, B.; Fiedler, U.; Conrad, U.; DuCring, K. Potato tubers as a biofactory for recombinant antibodies. Mol. Breed. 1998, 4, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, N.; Zhang, H.L.; Zhang, R.H.; Xu, Y.K. Current situation and prospect of potato planting in China. Chin. Potato J. 2021, 35, 81–96. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, W.J.; Qin, J.H.; Gu, J.M.; Chou, Z.J.; Zhou, J.; Xie, K.Y.; Lu, X.P. Discussion on staple potato in China from the perspective of world potato industry development. Food Nutr. China 2015, 21, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, V.; Singh, G.; Tyagi, A. Evaluation of different fungicides against Alternaria leaf blight of tomato (Alternaria solani). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, H. Taxonomy of Large-Spored Alternaria from Three Solanaceae Vegetables and the Heterokaryon Studies. Master’s thesis, Yangtze University, Wuhan, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andersen, B.; Nielsen, K.F.; Fernandez Pinto, V.; Patriarca, A. Characterization of Alternaria strains from Argentinean blueberry, tomato, walnut and wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 196, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Woudenberg, J.H.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Binder, M.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 171–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Truter, M.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Large-spored Alternaria pathogens in section Porri disentangled. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, L.; Cheng, H.; Liu, H.F.; Gao, G.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.N.; Deng, J.X. Pathogenicity and diversity of large-spored Alternaria associated with three solanaceous vegetables (Solanum tuberosum, S. lycopersicum and S. melongena) in China. Plant Pathol. 2022, 72, 376–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsedaley, B. Review on early blight (Alternaria spp.) of potato disease and its management options. J. Biol. Agr. Health 2014, 4, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kokaeva, L.Y.; Yarmeeva, M.M.; Kokaeva, Z.G.; Chudinova, E.M.; Balabko, P.N.; Elansky, S.N. Phylogenetic Study of Alternaria potato and tomato pathogens in Russia. Diversity 2022, 14, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bessadat, N.; Hamon, B.; Simoneau, N.B.; Simoneau, P. Characterization of new small-spored Alternaria species isolated from Solanaceae in Algeria. Life 2021, 11, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kokaeva, L.Y.; Belosokhov, A.F.; Doeva, L.Y.; Skolotneva, E.S.; Elansky, S.N. Distribution of Alternaria species on blighted potato and tomato leaves in Russia. J. Plant. Dis. Prot. 2018, 125, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patel, N.A.; Dange, S.R.S.; Patel, S.I. Efficacy of chemicals in controlling fruit rot of tomato caused by Alternaria tomato. Indian J. Agr. Res. 2005, 39, 72–75. [Google Scholar]
  20. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Seidl, M.F.; Groenewald, J.Z.; De, V.M.; Stielow, J.B.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formae speciales or pathotypes? Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual; CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pryor, B.M.; Gilbertson, R.L. Molecular phylogenetic relationships amongst Alternaria species and related fungi based upon analysis of nuclear ITS and mt SSU rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hong, S.G.; Cramer, R.A.; Lawrence, C.B.; Pryor, B.M. Alt a 1 allergen homologs from Alternaria and related taxa: Analysis of phylogenetic content and secondary structure. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lawrence, D.P.; Park, M.S.; Pryor, B.M. Nimbya and Embellisia revisited, with nov. comb. for Alternaria celosiae and A. perpunctulata. Mycol. Prog. 2012, 11, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lawrence, D.P.; Gannibal, P.B.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. The sections of Alternaria: Formalizing species-group concepts. Mycologia 2013, 105, 530–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lawrence, D.P.; Rotondo, F.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity and taxonomy of the pleomorphic genus Alternaria. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gou, Y.N.; Sein, L.L.A.; Aye, A.H.; Huang, C.X.; Deng, J.-X. Alternaria species in section Alternaria associated with Iris plants in China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1036950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al-Lami, H.F.D.; You, M.P.; Barbetti, M.J. Incidence, pathogenicity and diversity of Alternaria spp. associated with Alternaria leaf spot of canola (Brassica napus) in Australia. Plant Pathol. 2018, 68, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Watanabe, M.; Lee, K.; Goto, K.; Kumagai, S.; Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Rapid and effective DNA extraction method with bead grinding for a large amount of fungal DNA. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berbee, M.L.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 1999, 91, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in flamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andrew, M.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. An expanded multilocus phylogeny does not resolve morphological species within the small-spored Alternaria species complex. Mycologia 2009, 101, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hall, T.A. Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chun, J. Computer Assisted Classification and Identification of Actinomycetes. Ph.D. Thesis, Unversity of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1995. Available online: http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/410 (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  37. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. Model test: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 817–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efffcient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A. FigTree v.1.3.1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology; University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, J.F.; Jiang, H.B.; Jeewon, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Bhat, D.J.; Tang, S.-M.; Lumyong, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.-C.; Camporesi, E.; et al. Alternaria: Update on species limits, evolution, multi-locus phylogeny, and classification. Stud. Fungi 2023, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, J.; Phookamsak, R.; Jiang, H.; Bhat, D.J.; Camporesi, E.; Lumyong, S.; Kumla, J.; Hongsanan, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.; et al. Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, T.Y. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum, Alternaria; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2003; Volume 16, p. 35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Romain, B.B.N.D.; Hassan, O.; Kim, J.S.; Chang, T. Alternaria koreana sp. nov., a new pathogen isolated from leaf spot of ovate-leaf atractylodes in south Korea. Mol. Bio. Rep. 2022, 49, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, L.; Cheng, H.; Htun, A.A.; Ge, H.; Xia, Z.Z.; Guo, J.W.; Deng, J.X.; Du, T. Phylogeny and taxonomy of two new Alternaria (Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) species in section Gypsophilae from China. Mycol. Prog. 2021, 20, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pei, D.F.; Aung, S.L.L.; Liu, H.F.; Liu, Q.; Yu, Z.; Deng, J. Alternaria hydrangeae sp. nov. (Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) from Hydrangea paniculata in China. Phytotaxa 2019, 401, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, C.X.; Liu, F.Y.; Gou, Y.N.; Deng, J.X.; Li, M.J. Alternaria vignae sp. nov. (Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) from Vigna unguiculata in China. Phytotaxa 2022, 556, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, L.; Luo, H.; Cheng, H.; Gou, Y.N.; Yu, Z.H.; Deng, J.X. New species of large-spored Alternaria in section porri associated with Compositae plants in China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, H.; Zhao, L.; Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Gao, G.Y.; Deng, J.X.; Li, M.J. Alternaria species causing leaf spot on hemp (Cannabis sativa) in northern China. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 957–970. [Google Scholar]
  51. Guo, R.T. The Identification of Alternaria on Vegetable and the Research of the New Disease in China. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, H.F.; Liao, J.; Chen, X.Y.; Liu, Q.K.; Deng, J.X. A novel species and a new record of Alternaria isolated from two Solanaceae plants in China. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bessadat, N.; Berruyer, R.; Hamon, B.; Bataille-Simoneau, N.; Benichou, S.; Kihal, M.; Henni, D.E.; Simoneau, P. Alternaria species associated with early blight epidemics on tomato and other Solanaceae crops in northwestern Algeria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 148, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tymon, L.S.; Peever, T.L.; Johnson, A.D. Identification and enumeration of small-spored Alternaria associated with potato in the U.S. Northwest. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hopkins, J.C.F. Alternaria gossypina (Thüm.) comb. nov. causing a leaf spot and boll rot of cotton. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1931, 16, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Singh, S.; Ratnoo, R.S. Effect of different weather parameters on progression of Alternaria leaf spot (Alternaria gossypina) of cotton. J. Plant Dis. Sci. 2013, 8, 221–224. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sofie, L.; Michiel, V.; Bernard, D.B.; Monica, H.; Kris, A.; Geert, H. Identification of A. arborescens, A. grandis, and A. protenta as new members of the European Alternaria population on potato. Fungal Biol. 2017, 122, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tymon, L.S.; Cummings, T.F.; Johnson, D.A. Pathogenicity and aggressiveness of three Alternaria spp. on potato foliage in the U.S. northwest. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maurya, A.K.; Singh, A.U.; John, V.; Murmu, R. Occurrence of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot in Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) in Prayagraj area of Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Castanares, E.; Cabral, L.D.C.; Dinolfo, M.I.; Andersen, B.; Stenglein, S.A.; Patriarca, A. Alternaria in malting barley: Characterization and distribution in relation with climatic conditions and barley cultivars. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 357, 109367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on the combined gene sequences of ITS, GAPDH, TEF1, RPB2, Alt a 1, EndoPG and OPA10-2 generated from Alternaria spp. on potatoes and tomatoes. The Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP > 0.60) and maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS > 60%) are given at the nodes (PP/BS). Examined present strains are in bold.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on the combined gene sequences of ITS, GAPDH, TEF1, RPB2, Alt a 1, EndoPG and OPA10-2 generated from Alternaria spp. on potatoes and tomatoes. The Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP > 0.60) and maximum likelihood bootstrap values (BS > 60%) are given at the nodes (PP/BS). Examined present strains are in bold.
Jof 09 00880 g001
Figure 6. Pathogenicity of the seven present small-spored Alternaria species on Solanum tuberosum.
Figure 6. Pathogenicity of the seven present small-spored Alternaria species on Solanum tuberosum.
Jof 09 00880 g006
Table 1. The numbers of Alternaria strains collected from potato and tomato in different provinces of China.
Table 1. The numbers of Alternaria strains collected from potato and tomato in different provinces of China.
Host ProvinceSamplesTotal Number of Isolated Strains
Solanum tuberosumHubei1240
Gansu514
Shaanxi518
Sichuan24
Yunnan410
Xinjiang35
Solanum lycopersicumHubei612
Gansu22
Sichuan22
Xinjiang411
Table 3. Morphological comparisons of the present seven Alternaria species and their closely related species.
Table 3. Morphological comparisons of the present seven Alternaria species and their closely related species.
SpeciesConidiaSporulation PatternMedium
/Host
Reference
ShapeBody (μm)Beak (μm)SeptaConidia
Per chain
Branches
A. alternataOvoid, ellipsoid, or subsphaeroid or with short beak7–30(−40) × 5–123–5 (−30)1–74–20MultiplePCA[21]
A. alternataOvoid or ellipsoid with cylindric apex11–33 × 4–84–9 (−16)173–90–3PCAThis study
A. arborescensShort-ovoid or ellipsoid12–30(–42) × 7–111–42–6PCA[21]
A. arborescensShort-ovoid or ellipsoid15–32.5(–45) × 7–131–52–82–5PCAThis study
A. gossypinaObclavate or ovoid(14.5–)30.5–42.5(–48) × 11–14.5(−17)7.5–335–9Host[44]
A. gossypinaObclavate or ovoid(14–)28.5–54 ×10–16(−19)6–353–85–110PCAThis study
A. orobanchesObclavate to ovoid20–50 × 10–203–61–2PCA[42]
A. ovoideaOvoid48–65 × 15.5–301–31PCA[43]
A. lycopersiciStraight, clavate, ellipsoid or ovoid18–41 × 9.5–133.5–81–72–40PCAThis study
A. solanicolaShort to long oviod or ellipsoid or with beak22–44 × 9–16.56–26.51–62–40–2PCAThis study
A. longxiensisShort to long ellipsoid or narrow-ovoid22.5–51 × 8.5–176–18.51–72–60PCAThis study
A. lijiangensisOvate, elliptic or ovoid to obpyriform25.5–45 × 10–15.55–401–53–70PCAThis study
Table 4. Disease incidence and lesion size of seven present small-spored Alternaria species on Solanum tuberosum.
Table 4. Disease incidence and lesion size of seven present small-spored Alternaria species on Solanum tuberosum.
SpeciesStrain Disease Incidence (%) Lesion (mm)
A. lijiangensis sp. nov.YZU 221458100 ± 0 a27.5 ± 0.69 a
YZU 221459100 ± 0 a27.04 ± 0.31 a
A. gossypinaYZU 221455100 ± 0 a21.35 ± 0.62 b
A. arborescensYZU 221451100 ± 0 a18.14 ± 0.15 c
A. longxiensis sp. nov.YZU 221221100 ± 0 a15.65 ± 0.49 d
YZU 221222100 ± 0 a16.35 ± 0.89 d
A. lycopersici sp. nov.YZU 221185100 ± 0 a11.27 ± 0.34 e
YZU 221186100 ± 0 a11.5 ± 0.20 e
A. solanicola sp. nov.YZU 221189100 ± 0 a8.63 ± 0.39 f
YZU 221190100 ± 0 a8.22 ± 0.88 f
A. alternataYZU 221086100 ± 0 a6.75 ± 0.08 g
YZU 221102100 ± 0 a6.08 ± 0.45 g
Notes: Disease incidence (DI) was evaluated by counting the percentage of diseased leaves. Lesion size (LS) values are the mean value of three replicates ± standard deviation. Values followed by different lowercase letters within a column are significantly different according to the least significant difference test (p < 0.05) using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gou, Y.; Aung, S.L.L.; Guo, Z.; Li, Z.; Shen, S.; Deng, J. Four New Species of Small-Spored Alternaria Isolated from Solanum tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090880

AMA Style

Gou Y, Aung SLL, Guo Z, Li Z, Shen S, Deng J. Four New Species of Small-Spored Alternaria Isolated from Solanum tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in China. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(9):880. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gou, Yanan, Sein Lai Lai Aung, Zhuanjun Guo, Zhi Li, Shulin Shen, and Jianxin Deng. 2023. "Four New Species of Small-Spored Alternaria Isolated from Solanum tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in China" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 9: 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090880

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop