Skip to Content
GelsGels
  • Review
  • Open Access

25 April 2024

Biomedical Trends in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels with Emphasis on Chitosan-Based Formulations

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Biomedicine and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Narutowicza 60, 90-136 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Genetics, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland
3
Department of Functional Genomics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Zeligowskiego 7/9, 90-752 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Chitosan Hydrogels

Abstract

Biomedicine is constantly evolving to ensure a significant and positive impact on healthcare, which has resulted in innovative and distinct requisites such as hydrogels. Chitosan-based formulations stand out for their versatile utilization in drug encapsulation, transport, and controlled release, which is complemented by their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-immunogenic nature. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels, also known as smart hydrogels, have strictly regulated release patterns since they respond and adapt based on various external stimuli. Moreover, they can imitate the intrinsic tissues’ mechanical, biological, and physicochemical properties. These characteristics allow stimuli-responsive hydrogels to provide cutting-edge, effective, and safe treatment. Constant progress in the field necessitates an up-to-date summary of current trends and breakthroughs in the biomedical application of stimuli-responsive chitosan-based hydrogels, which was the aim of this review. General data about hydrogels sensitive to ions, pH, redox potential, light, electric field, temperature, and magnetic field are recapitulated. Additionally, formulations responsive to multiple stimuli are mentioned. Focusing on chitosan-based smart hydrogels, their multifaceted utilization was thoroughly described. The vast application spectrum encompasses neurological disorders, tumors, wound healing, and dermal infections. Available data on smart chitosan hydrogels strongly support the idea that current approaches and developing novel solutions are worth improving. The present paper constitutes a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the currently evolving field.

1. Introduction

The field of biomedicine is constantly evolving to provide substantial advancements in healthcare. Tremendous progress was made regarding novel and unique strategies, such as advanced materials that are devised, tested, and thoroughly examined to improve safety and effectiveness in various biomedical applications. These materials are carefully engineered with specific physical, chemical, or biological properties to prevent and treat various diseases [1,2]. Hydrogels represent a cutting-edge and highly promising subset of advanced materials that is worthy of in-depth exploration [3].
Hydrogels are three-dimensional (3D) polymer networks with the characteristics of both solids and liquids, allowing for straightforward measurement of their mechanical properties. Since they resemble liquids, processes such as diffusion, absorption, and release of molecules are facilitated [4,5,6]. Hydrogels can be categorized based on various factors, including their source, preparation method, ionic charge, responsiveness, cross-linking, and physical properties [7]. Incorporating natural polymers as their primary components provides benefits such as biocompatibility and biodegradability [6,7,8]. The application of hydrogels is extensive and encompasses medicine, pharmacy, personal care, agriculture, the food industry, and the environment [3]. Their utilization in the biomedical fields provides novel data about pathological mechanisms or strategies for tissue regeneration and the management of diseases [9,10].
Chitosan (CS) is an amino polysaccharide obtained by deacetylation of naturally occurring chitin from the exoskeleton of shrimps, crabs, and squids [11]. CS demonstrates anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory characteristics alongside being biocompatible and biodegradable. Its hemostatic nature, ensured by its high charge, is advantageous since it stimulates erythrocyte adhesion, fibrinogen adsorption, and platelet activation [12,13], which paved the way for multiple studies of chitosan-based formulations on wound healing [14,15]. Their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the ability to encapsulate and release the drug make them attractive and highly applicable molecular carriers. Thus, it is no wonder that chitosan-based formulations are employed in neurological disorders, diabetes, tumors, and cardiovascular diseases [16,17,18,19].
Hydrogels are being constantly improved to provide superior clinical results. Among the upgrades, stimuli-responsive formulations are worth exploring since they react and adjust in response to various external stimuli such as pH, temperature, light, electric field, or ions [18]. Some are developed with multi-responsive properties to react to stimuli such as pH and reducing or oxidizing agents. The triggering stimuli for these hydrogels can occur simultaneously and independently, contingent upon the design and intended application [20]. Their capacity to undergo changes when exposed to stimuli enables highly controlled release patterns. Furthermore, stimuli-responsive hydrogels can mimic intrinsic tissues’ mechanical, biological, and physicochemical characteristics. These unique features position stimuli-responsive hydrogels at the forefront of innovation, facilitating more efficient and safer strategies. Since there is constant progress in the field, it is necessary to provide an up-to-date summary of current trends and breakthroughs in the biomedical application of stimuli-responsive chitosan-based hydrogels, which was the aim of this review. The present paper constitutes a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners.

2. Manufacture, Structure, and Administration of Hydrogels

2.1. Manufacturing Hydrogels

Hydrogels are manufactured through diverse strategies tailored to the type of intended application, such as 3D printing in tissue engineering. Formulations are divided depending on the number of monomers and their arrangement, which dictates their further application. Manufacture typically involves polymerizing a given compound and cross-linking reactions between the components. This results in diverse types of structures with a wide range of applications (Figure 1) [21,22,23]. Dynamic covalent bonds provide the strong yet dynamic properties of hydrogels. Pectin is used to acquire better control over the release of drugs and to design supramolecular hydrogels with high molecular complexity, detailed as non-contact and contact stimuli-responsive hydrogels [24,25,26,27]. Examples of non-contact stimuli-responsive formulations are photo-sensitive hydrogels whose production utilizes light-responsive compounds, such as azobenzenes, diarylethenes, coumarins, and nitrobenzyl derivatives. Another subset includes thermo-responsive hydrogels that use lower critical solution temperature and upper critical solution temperature to shift between concentration phases [28,29,30,31]; their production utilizes N,N-dimethylacrylamide, ammoniopropane sulfonate, or poly (2-ethoxyethyl vinyl ether) [32,33]. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels are commonly used in medicine; they can be produced using Schiff base cross-links or DNA triplex structures that respond to environmental changes [34,35]. In general, there is an extensive diversity of techniques available for creating hydrogels, spanning from molecular assembly to cutting-edge 3D printing methods. These techniques are customized to suit the particular type of hydrogel being produced and its intended use [25,36].
Figure 1. Manufacture, structure, and example applications of polymeric compositions. Formulations are divided depending on the number of monomers and their arrangement, which dictates their further application, e.g., in drug delivery, tissue engineering, and wastewater remediation. Figure created with BioRender.com.

2.2. Structure of Chitosan and the Process of Obtaining Hydrogels

Despite their similar structure, hydrogels can be differentiated based on their origin into synthetic, semi-synthetic, and natural ones. While the choice of the source varies depending on specific applications and desired properties, natural polymer-based hydrogels are often favored over synthetic ones due to their biocompatibility and safety [37]. The human body contains hydrogel structures such as collagen, gelatin, cartilage, mucous, epidermis, meniscus, tendons, and vitreous humor [38]. Biomaterials are widely observed in nature and can be produced using, e.g., various saccharides built of monosaccharide units (homopolysaccharides) such as cellulose, agarose, or chitin. The latter is considered one of the most promising in the development of novel medical solutions [22,37].
Chitin is a natural carbohydrate in the exoskeletons of, e.g., crabs, lobsters, shrimps, and squids. Its repeating units are linked by β-glycosidic linkages. Through its deacetylation in alkaline media, it is possible to obtain chitosan that has functional groups such as C3–OH, C6–OH, and C2–NH2, as well as acetylamino and glycoside bonds (Figure 2) [37]. Their modification ensures desirable physical and chemical properties for the specific purpose and type of further administration [39]. Homopolymers of chitosan cross-linked together create a molecular lattice. Its hydrophilic and 3D structure determines permeability for bioactive substances [22], which enables it to retain significant amounts of water and biological fluids. Chitosan homopolymers maintain the integrity of their network and do not dissolve in water at neutral pH, but they can be dissolved in acidic conditions due to the protonation of free amino groups [40].
Figure 2. The process of obtaining chitosan-based hydrogels via cross-linking. The exoskeleton of, e.g., crabs, lobsters, shrimps, or squids is the source of chitin that may be deacetylated in alkaline media to obtain chitosan. The latter has functional groups such as C3–OH, C6–OH, C2–NH2, as well as acetylamino and glycoside bonds. Figure created with BioRender.com.

2.3. Routes of Administering Hydrogels

Ongoing efforts provide novel drug delivery approaches to ensure suitable concentrations for therapeutic responses. Some medicines are quickly processed in the body, so they need to be administered often to maintain the appropriate levels in the blood, which is less convenient for patients and poses a risk of missing a dose. Ideally, the therapeutics should provide quick response, work for a long time, and stay at an adequate level. Chitosan and its nanoparticle derivatives assist the process by slowly releasing medicine over time, facilitating usage, and reducing unwanted effects [39]. Utilizing chitosan-based and other kinds of hydrogels for drug delivery has been explored through various administration routes, such as the transdermal route, in which hydrogels form a wound dressing that releases bioactive compounds to recreate natural conditions and promote healing [41]. This approach can also deliver the drug through the skin into the bloodstream. Aided by iontophoresis and electroporation, the transdermal route has enabled increased absorption of compounds such as insulin and vasopressin [42]. Three-dimensional molecular networks can also be administered to the patient through injections, which allow for precise delivery of the substance to the targeted area, such as the knee joint [43]. Another route is oral administration since hydrogels can effectively cope with the low pH of the stomach or even release the active substance in response to the acidic environment [44]. Biomaterials can also be delivered via ocular, nasal, vaginal, and rectal administration [45,46,47,48].

2.4. Advantages of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels

Incorporating chitosan in hydrogels ensures improved biocompatibility and biodegradability, as well as elevated resistance to deformation and collapse [49,50]. Chitosan-based hydrogels have anti-bacterial abilities linked to the chitosan’s positively charged amino groups that can interact with negatively charged components of the bacterial cell wall, increasing permeability and leading to cell damage [51]. Furthermore, chitosan has a high charge, which can promote platelet activation, fibrinogen adsorption, and erythrocyte adhesion. It also has a hemostatic effect, which improves wound healing [12,13]. Since hydrogels have properties similar to liquids, molecules may be readily diffused, absorbed, and released [6]. Adding chitosan into the hydrogel structure makes it more hydrophilic, allowing it to swell and expand in the presence of liquid [40,52]. In addition to chitosan concentration, examples of key agents influencing the physicochemical properties of these hydrogels are cross-linkers (e.g., genipine, glutaraldehyde) and hydroxy acids (e.g., mandelic acid, lactobionic acid), which affect morphology, swelling ability, viscosity, mechanical strength, or cytotoxicity [53,54,55,56].
Chitosan was compared to its derivatives or alternative hydrogel-forming compounds. One of the studies utilized chitosan–graft–glycerol and carboxymethyl chitosan–graft–glycerol hydrogels to reduce the side effects of vincristine sulphate; both showed a high swelling ratio and sustained release behavior, indicating their effectiveness in drug delivery to breast cancer cells. Encapsulation efficiency was better in hydrogels based on chitosan (72.28–89.97%) than its derivative (56.97–71.91%) [57]. Another study compared chitosan hydrogel with povidone–iodine hydrogel, revealing similar anti-bacterial activity but a higher in vivo wound closure when using chitosan hydrogel. Additionally, the latter enhanced collagen deposition and decreased the production of proinflammatory cytokines, indicating that the chitosan formulation is an effective alternative to povidone–iodine hydrogel [58].
Chitosan-based hydrogels can also serve as a base for additives or as a standalone compound combined with other gels. Scientists eliminated proteins, pigments, mineral salts, and waxes from the bodies of naturally occurring dead honeybees to produce an exoskeleton-derived chitosan termed Beetosan®. Following the hydrogel preparation and introduction of nanoadditives for biocidal activity, researchers measured the swelling, surface characteristics, sorption capacity, cell interaction, and behavior in simulated body fluids such as Ringer’s liquid or artificial saliva. Although chitosan and Beetosan® hydrogels had similar functional characteristics, their structure differed—a certain amount of chitin was retained in the pores of Beetosan®, which decreased sorption capacity due to the clogging of pores after introducing silver nanoparticles. Nonetheless, the use of naturally expired honeybees in synthesizing hydrogel materials was noted as a remarkable step due to the possibility of utilizing waste materials [59]. Another study investigated Aloe vera leaf gel and chitosan nanoparticle thin-film membranes to heal wounds infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Thirty rats were randomized into five treatment groups that received 0.9% saline solution, saline, chitosan nanoparticle thin-film membrane, Aloe vera leaf gel, or Aloe vera leaf gel in combination with chitosan thin-film membranes. Compared to the separate treatments, Aloe vera leaf gel combined with chitosan nanoparticle thin-film membranes decreased the maturation time of granulation tissue, enhanced reepithelialisation, improved collagen deposition, and reduced bacterial count. The authors concluded that Aloe vera leaf gel with chitosan nanoparticle thin-film membranes has reproducible wound healing potential and the potential to be a viable treatment [60].

3. Selected Types of Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels

Hydrogels respond to various stimuli, which allows for dynamic control over their properties and behavior in a wide array of applications. Consecutive subsections summarize formulations responsive to one or more stimuli such as ions, pH, redox potential, light, electric field, temperature, and magnetic field, which are recapitulated in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Types of stimuli-responsive hydrogels and their potential application. Hydrogels can react to ions, pH, redox potential, light, electric field, temperature, and magnetic field. They may also respond to several stimuli concurrently and independently. The penultimate chapter of the present paper provides a comprehensive summary of their application. Figure created with BioRender.com.

3.1. Ion-Responsive Hydrogels

Formulations sensitive to ions utilize homeostatic ionic strength and composition to trigger drug release, phase transition, or diagnostic signal emission [61]. Furthermore, they may be useful in treating diseases with dysregulated ionic concentrations or with toxic ions present. Elevated calcium ion (Ca2+) levels in the bloodstream have been associated with a range of vascular and bone disorders. Zinc ion (Zn2+) concentrations are notably higher in nervous tissue, whereas fluctuations of iron ion (Fe3+) are related to anemia [61,62,63]. Ion-responsive hydrogels can be implemented to counteract potentially hazardous heavy metal contamination caused by technological advancements. Designing carriers for chelating agents that are released in response to specific toxic ions may be valuable in industrial settings [64]. Regarding water contamination, there has been research on mercury ion detection and its removal from wastewater with the use of hydrogels containing a rhodamine derivative and four different chelating agents [65]. Regarding anion-responsive formulations, a study by Wang et al. highlighted that fluoride (F) and chloride (Cl) prompt the gel to collapse because of their strong hydrogen atom binding, whereas iodide (I) causes a color alteration in the gel without complete degradation [66,67]. Chitosan-based hydrogels exhibit gelation and swelling behavior that can be altered by ionic strength [68,69]. A chitosan hydrogel actuator was created by Zhu et al. using an anodic electrical writing process. The gradient structure of hydrogel allowed it to bend autonomously, with opposite bending in deionized water or NaCl solution [70].

3.2. pH-Responsive Hydrogels

Formulations are responsive to pH function because hydrogen ion concentration varies depending on the physiological compartment [71]. Such hydrogels are composed of a primary polymer structure that exhibits weak acidic or basic groups. These groups become more charged in environments with fluctuating pH levels [72]. This affects ionic strength and leads to gel shrinking or swelling. In an alkaline environment, acidic group-containing formulations such as carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels undergo ionization. Coupled with electrostatic repulsion, this induces a phase transition characterized by drastic swelling [73,74]. Hydrogels containing basic residues operate on an analogous principle, where they release the drug into the target area in an environment with low pH due to fixed negative charges on the polymer and positive charges in the solution [74]. Hydrogen responsiveness is useful in oral drug delivery since the gastrointestinal tract is characterized by a very low pH, which often disrupts drug absorption in the stomach [71]. The pH-sensitive swelling of chitosan hydrogel involves the protonation of its amine groups under low pH conditions [75], which was found useful in drug delivery [76,77]. El-Mahrouk et al. successfully constructed a metronidazole-containing chitosan formulation that had the ability to remain in the stomachs of dogs and to release the drug in a controlled manner. The study demonstrated greater efficacy of hydrogel compared to the classical method of drug administration [78]. Another application was proposed by Ezati et al., who developed a composite film that changed color in response to a pH of 4 to 10. The authors suggested that chitosan-alizarin film can be used for smart food packaging [79].

3.3. Redox-Responsive Hydrogels

Changes in the redox potential are one of the most crucial triggers in biomedical research. A balanced redox state is critical in many physiological processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, cellular death, gene expression, mitochondrial activity, Ca2+ regulation, immunological response, and neural development. In healthy individuals, redox systems such as glutathione and its disulfide (GSH/GSSG) work continuously to buffer reactive oxygen species (ROS) and maintain a stable environment. Patients with cancer, fibrosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular or neurological diseases have dysregulated redox metabolism [80,81,82]. Redox-responsive hydrogels comprise chemically cross-linked polymer networks created by an intermolecular thiol–disulfide exchange reaction between hyperbranched polyamidoamines [81]. Redox responsiveness is achieved through the inclusion of particular chemical components. One such chemical moiety is the disulfide linker, which may be broken down in the presence of reducing agents such as glutathione. Another one that may also respond to reactive oxygen species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), is the selenide group [18,83]. Redox sensitivity is frequently integrated into structures that respond to other factors, e.g., pH or light [84]. With the physiological redox environment thoroughly explored, redox-responsive hydrogels may be used in a variety of biomedical applications. In tissue engineering, they can act as biodegradable scaffolds for organ restoration. Active substances such as growth factors can be placed into hydrogel scaffolds and released in response to redox cues, promoting cellular invasion and proliferation [85]. Redox-responsive hydrogels, particularly those formed by in situ gelling methods, are effective in the topical release of medication. Due to the differences in redox potential between intracellular compartments and the extracellular matrix, premature drug release is prevented, and redox-responsive hydrogels dispense the medication inside cells [81]. Redox-responsive chitosan hydrogels are useful in cancer therapy due to their ROS responsiveness [86,87]. These formulations respond to a reductive or oxidative environment, which is utilized in drug release [88]. Chitosan hydrogel can also undergo electrografting to manufacture a catechol-modified formulation that serves as a redox capacitor, which can be further enriched with nanoparticles to amplify electrochemical signals [89].

3.4. Photo-Sensitive Hydrogels

Hydrogels can also respond to light—an easily acquired, effective, non-invasive external stimulus with excellent adaptability and versatility [90]. Such formulations usually comprise a polymeric structure and a photo-reactive component [91]. Chromophore absorbs the light and turns it into a chemical signal through a photoreaction such as isomerization (conversion of one isomer into another isomer by light), cleavage (splitting of chemical bonds caused by light), or dimerization (formation of dimers by a photochemical reaction) [92]. Response to light can also result in water absorption or release, leading to volume changes and further swelling or shrinking [93,94]. To initiate a desired reaction, the type and positioning of photo-sensitive moieties must be carefully considered, similar to the selection of an appropriate light source to meet the specific demands of the application. In general, the emission spectrum and the photo-responsive absorption profile should align in an uncontested region of the electromagnetic range in order to increase light penetration depth and the ratio of photons absorbed to those released [95]. Derivatives of o-nitrobenzyl compounds are by far the most commonly utilized photolabile group that has progressed into hydrogel chemistry [96]. Given their photolysis process and adaptable chemical structure, they can function as photocages or photolabile linkers. Absorption characteristics have been tuned by changing the aromatic structure; the initial structure of o-nitrobenzyl ester undergoes photolysis when exposed to 260 nm light, yielding carboxylic acid and o-nitrosobenzyladehyde [97]. Coumarin derivatives are promising as substitutes for o-nitrobenzyl analogs due to their biocompatibility, rapid splitting rates, redshifted absorbance, and processes induced by two-photon absorption. Several modifications of coumarin derivatives have been applied to change their absorption to a medically valuable range [98]. Other photolabile compounds, such as triphenylmethane, p-hydroxyphenyl, and 8-bromo-7-hydroxylquinoline derivatives, have not yet been proven significant for their use in hydrogels [97]. Photo-sensitive hydrogels are utilized in vitro to mimic in vivo conditions—they act as scaffolds, simulating the dynamic nature of biomechanics in live tissues, because they enable distant and contact-free modulation of growth. It is also possible to utilize them in the dimensional and temporary release of medication since 3D networks may encapsulate a variety of pharmaceuticals, and the gel-to-sol transition induced by light can release the medication [99]. These hydrogels are also valuable in the manufacture of adaptable surfaces or soft smart actuators [97,100]. In addition to biodegradability and biocompatibility, chitosan-based hydrogels are characterized by mechanical strength and elasticity, which may be adjusted by the cross-linking process and the addition of various photo-sensitive components [49]. The latter allows it to absorb contaminants, which is valuable in water purification [101].

3.5. Electricity-Responsive Hydrogels

The mechanism of action in these hydrogels is based on ions that migrate once the electric current is applied, leading to a phenomenon known as electroosmotic flow [102]. Once the hydrogel contracts, the particles move toward their intended location, often carrying the opposing charge [93]. The conductive abilities of hydrogels arise from their combination with materials that are able to conduct electricity, such as carbon materials (nanotubes and nanofibers), gold or graphene particles, and various metals [103]. Polymers such as polyaniline, polypyrrole, and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) are useful as well [104]. Electroactive hydrogels are characterized by significant water solubility and flexibility, allowing them to change volume and shape by bending, expanding, or scaling down in response to electric stimuli [93,105]. These formulations are useful as smart skin patches because they can modulate ion channels crucial for proliferation, angiogenesis, and tissue regeneration [20]. They can be utilized as injectable vehicles because of their high biocompatibility and maintenance of drug release time, type, and dose. Such an approach is used in the delivery of benzoic acid, amoxicillin, and curcumin [49,106]. Electricity-responsive formulations are also found in bioelectronic devices such as real-time wound monitors or cardiac sensors. Moreover, they are useful in evaluating food quality and safety [89]. Chitosan-based formulations responsive to electricity are polycationic, which makes them a versatile biomedical material. Electroosmosis enables hydrogel swelling on the cathode side while shrinking on the anode side, thus bending to the latter. Chitosan strands will bend back when the polarity of the electric field is inverted [107,108].

3.6. Thermo-Responsive Hydrogels

Hydrogels can alter their physical properties (sol-to-gel transition) in response to temperature changes by adjusting the composition of the polymer network [109]. Phase changing begins when a polymer is subjected to stimuli (temperature)—the micelle structure of the polymer switches into a network structure, creating a scaffold [110]. The mechanism of thermo-responsive hydrogels involves the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) and the upper critical solution temperature (UCST). When LCST is present, polymers typically go through a phase separation when the temperature rises above the LCST but return to a single phase when the temperature drops below the LCST. Conversely, UCST polymers tend to experience a phase separation below the UCST but return to a single phase when the temperature exceeds the UCST [111]. One of the most extensively exploited thermo-sensitive hydrogels is based on poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) and undergoes a reversible phase transition near body temperature [112]. Formulations responsive to temperature can also be derived from natural polymers such as chitosan, cellulose, gelatin, collagen, alginate, and hyaluronic acid, which are valuable in medical applications due to their biocompatibility and biodegradability [113,114]. One can utilize these hydrogels in drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, or disease diagnosis and treatment [115,116]. For instance, a thermosensitive injectable chitosan hydrogel was developed for the sustained delivery of disulfiram to cancer cells, showing improved cellular uptake compared to disulfiram alone [117].

3.7. Magnetic-Responsive Hydrogels

The incorporation of nanoparticles into the hydrogels allows them to respond to the magnetic field [118]. These particles may self-assemble into an organized structure on the hydrogel surface, which was utilized to regulate cell proliferation, neurogenesis, signal transmission, and extracellular matrix regeneration [94]. Magnetic components can take the form of plated oxides or metallic particles that utilize nickel, iron, or cobalt [118]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles are frequently used in pharmaceutical settings due to their biocompatibility, strong magnetic ability, and relative simplicity of synthesis [119]. Aside from the type of gel networks and nanoparticles used, the physicochemical characteristics and responsiveness of the hydrogels are impacted by the size and distribution of magnetic components, which affect the interaction with polymer networks. A typical way to create magnetic hydrogels is to mix magnetic nanoparticle suspension with hydrogel precursor solution and then gelatinize under specific conditions [120]. These hydrogels are used in drug delivery since they do not require tactile activation and may be controlled remotely in demanding settings. Under an alternating magnetic field, nanoparticles vibrate, and the temperature of the polymer increases, leading to drug release. Furthermore, magnetic-responsive hydrogels are utilized in the chemotherapy of tumors. Some nanoparticles tend to agglomerate when exposed to a magnetic field, resulting in fewer pores and restricted medication delivery [94]. Many studies have validated the use of these hydrogels in tissue engineering due to their modulating effect on various cells under static or pulsed magnetic fields [121,122,123]. Additionally, magnetic hydrogel-based soft robotics have received increasing attention due to their remote control and unlimited tissue penetration depth [120]. Chitosan-based magnetic-responsive hydrogels can be tuned by adjusting the concentration of magnetic nanoparticles and the cross-linking density of the hydrogel [124,125]. Adjusting their viscoelastic properties ensures controlled drug release [126].

3.8. Multi-Responsive Hydrogels

In addition to hydrogels responding to a single stimulus at a time, some formulations can react to many stimuli simultaneously and independently [127]. Their preparation is based on cross-linking via covalent and non-covalent methods [128] or combining desired stimuli into existing hydrogel systems [129]. Multiple-responsive hydrogels are superior to single-responsive hydrogels since they provide a more dynamic and controlled response after application, which makes them more adaptable, susceptible to modification, and tailored to specific needs [130]. Regarding drug delivery, enhanced control of environmental behavior renders more accurate release to a target area, which reduces the manifestation of side effects [20]. For instance, vincristine and dexamethasone were delivered using multi-responsive hydrogels controlled by pH, temperature, and enzyme concentration [57]. Scaffolds regulated by pH, temperature, and ionic strength within the tumor microenvironment allowed drug accumulation in cancer cells. Such an approach showed satisfying results in doxorubicin delivery in vitro [131]. Multi-responsive formulations were also used in central nervous system injuries, bleeding, and bone tissue engineering [14,132,133]. Regarding chitosan hydrogels, multi-responsiveness depends on functional groups introduced into their structure [134,135]. Incorporation of these groups is possible via, e.g., protonation, deprotonation, hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance, chemical cross-linking, graft copolymerization, or blending with other polymers, which offer more functionality and tunability than hydrogels reacting to one stimulus [49,106,134,136,137,138].

5. Concluding Remarks

The present paper reviewed various stimuli-responsive chitosan-based hydrogels and their biomedical applications, where tremendous progress has been made in the last few years. Although smart chitosan-based hydrogels are already characterized by prominent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-immunogenicity [12,13], they are constantly being improved to obtain better results in clinical settings. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels can be produced using Schiff base cross-links or DNA triplex structures; manufacturing hydrogels differs based on their future applications [34,35]. Responsiveness to stimuli may be contact-dependent or independent [24,25,26,27]. Hydrogels are also differentiated based on their origin into synthetic, semi-synthetic, and natural. The latter are often favored over synthetic ones due to their biocompatibility and safety [37].
Hydrogels respond to diverse types of stimuli. In this review, we summarized responsiveness to ions, pH, redox potential, light, electric field, temperature, and magnetic field, as well as hydrogels that are sensitive to two or more stimuli. Ion-responsive hydrogels utilize ionic strength and composition to trigger drug release, phase transition, or diagnostic signal emission [61]. Regarding pH responsiveness, hydrogen ions regulate gel shrinkage or swelling, which is useful in drug administration to a gastrointestinal system in which low pH can impede absorption [71,73,74]. Redox-responsive hydrogels allow drug administration inside cells while preventing premature release; they can be used in tissue engineering and repair, as well as topical medication delivery [81,85]. Photo-sensitive hydrogels respond to light stimuli, creating a polymeric structure useful for simulating biomechanics in living tissues and regulating medicine delivery [91,97,100]. The mechanism of action in electroactive hydrogels is based on ions that migrate once the electric current is applied. These formulations are utilized in dressings, injectable medication administration, and bioelectronic devices [20,89,93,106]. Thermo-responsive hydrogels modify their physical characteristics in reaction to temperature changes, which helps in tissue engineering, wound healing, and disease detection or therapy [109,115]. Magnetic-responsive hydrogels are made via the incorporation of nanoparticles, facilitating drug delivery, tissue engineering, and soft robotics. These hydrogels can influence neurogenesis, signal transmission, and the extracellular matrix [94,118,120]. Chitosan-based hydrogels may also respond to several stimuli concurrently and independently, resulting in a more dynamic and sophisticated response, as well as negative effect limitation. These formulations are employed in tissue engineering, wound healing, and cancer treatment [14,127,130,131,132,133].
The positive effects of chitosan-based formulations in wound healing have been confirmed by numerous studies [6,145,146,147,149]. Because the current therapeutic approaches for neurological diseases sometimes yield unsatisfactory outcomes, smart chitosan hydrogels are investigated for their potential to solve problems such as limited accessibility or high levels of risk and discomfort during therapeutic procedures [161,162]. Some studies focused on the implementation of smart chitosan hydrogels in tissue engineering related to skeletal and nervous systems [178,179,184,188]. Hydrogels are also known for their drug delivery capacities, which has been utilized in various diseases such as cancer [214], gastric ulcer [221], rheumatoid arthritis [223] or glaucoma [234].
Conclusively, chitosan-based stimuli-responsive hydrogels are advanced materials that exhibit pleiotropic functions in a vast biomedical spectrum, which ensures promising outcomes in the treatment of various conditions. Despite the existence of a considerable amount of research on smart chitosan hydrogels, available data strongly support the idea that it is worth improving current approaches and developing novel solutions.

Author Contributions

W.K., J.G., K.G., G.L., P.B., K.K.K. and D.K. conceptualized the article; D.K. supervised the article; W.K., J.G., K.G., G.L., M.K. and D.K. visualized the figures; W.K., J.G., K.G., G.L. and P.B. wrote the original draft; W.K., J.G., K.G., G.L., P.B., K.K.K., M.K., Z.P., Ż.K.-K. and D.K. reviewed and edited article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vallet-Regí, M. Evolution of Biomaterials. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 864016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alshangiti, D.M.; El-Damhougy, T.K.; Zaher, A.; Madani, M.; Mohamady Ghobashy, M. Revolutionizing biomedicine: Advancements, applications, and prospects of nanocomposite macromolecular carbohydrate-based hydrogel biomaterials: A review. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 35251–35291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gutierrez, A.M.; Frazar, E.M.; Klaus, M.V.X.; Paul, P.; Hilt, J.Z. Hydrogels and Hydrogel Nanocomposites: Enhancing Healthcare through Human and Environmental Treatment. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, e2101820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mann, J.L.; Yu, A.C.; Agmon, G.; Appel, E.A. Supramolecular polymeric biomaterials. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 6, 10–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, P.; Liu, L.; He, G.; Zhang, T.; Yang, M.; Cai, J.; Fan, L.; Tao, S. Preparation and properties of carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1692–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klosinski, K.K.; Wach, R.A.; Girek-Bak, M.K.; Rokita, B.; Kolat, D.; Kaluzinska-Kolat, Z.; Klosinska, B.; Duda, L.; Pasieka, Z.W. Biocompatibility and Mechanical Properties of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogels. Polymers 2022, 15, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aswathy, S.H.; Narendrakumar, U.; Manjubala, I. Commercial hydrogels for biomedical applications. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Varghese, S.A.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J. Natural polymers and the hydrogels prepared from them. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 17–47. [Google Scholar]
  9. Contessotto, P.; Orbanic, D.; Da Costa, M.; Jin, C.; Owens, P.; Chantepie, S.; Chinello, C.; Newell, J.; Magni, F.; Papy-Garcia, D.; et al. Elastin-like recombinamers-based hydrogel modulates post-ischemic remodeling in a non-transmural myocardial infarction in sheep. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eaaz5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mitura, S.; Sionkowska, A.; Jaiswal, A. Biopolymers for hydrogels in cosmetics: Review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2020, 31, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Islam, N.; Hoque, M.; Taharat, S.F. Recent advances in extraction of chitin and chitosan. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cherng, J.H.; Lin, C.J.; Liu, C.C.; Yeh, J.Z.; Fan, G.Y.; Tsai, H.D.; Chung, C.F.; Hsu, S.D. Hemostasis and Anti-Inflammatory Abilities of AuNPs-Coated Chitosan Dressing for Burn Wounds. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, C.H.; Cherng, J.H.; Liu, C.C.; Fang, T.J.; Hong, Z.J.; Chang, S.J.; Fan, G.Y.; Hsu, S.D. Procoagulant and Antimicrobial Effects of Chitosan in Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fan, P.; Zeng, Y.; Zaldivar-Silva, D.; Aguero, L.; Wang, S. Chitosan-Based Hemostatic Hydrogels: The Concept, Mechanism, Application, and Prospects. Molecules 2023, 28, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, X.; Song, R.; Johnson, M.; A, S.; Shen, P.; Zhang, N.; Lara-Saez, I.; Xu, Q.; Wang, W. Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Infected Wound Treatment. Macromol. Biosci. 2023, 23, e2300094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Do, N.H.N.; Truong, Q.T.; Le, P.K.; Ha, A.C. Recent developments in chitosan hydrogels carrying natural bioactive compounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 294, 119726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, T.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Shang, Y.; Nuri Ertas, Y.; Orive, G. Chitosan-functionalized bioplatforms and hydrogels in breast cancer: Immunotherapy, phototherapy and clinical perspectives. Drug Discov. Today 2024, 29, 103851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Wu, B.M. Current Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels as Smart Drug Delivery Carriers. Gels 2023, 9, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hoque, J.; Sangaj, N.; Varghese, S. Stimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Hydrogels and Their Applications in Regenerative Medicine. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, e1800259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, S.; Li, X.; Han, L. Recent developments in stimuli-responsive hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biosurf. Biotribol. 2022, 8, 290–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thirupathi, K.; Raorane, C.J.; Ramkumar, V.; Ulagesan, S.; Santhamoorthy, M.; Raj, V.; Krishnakumar, G.S.; Phan, T.T.V.; Kim, S.C. Update on Chitosan-Based Hydrogels: Preparation, Characterization, and Its Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Applications. Gels 2022, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ho, T.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chan, H.P.; Chung, T.W.; Shu, C.W.; Chuang, K.P.; Duh, T.H.; Yang, M.H.; Tyan, Y.C. Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules 2022, 27, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aminabhavi, T.M.; Dharupaneedi, S.P. Production of chitosan-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. In Chitosan Based Biomaterials Volume 1; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 295–319. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zheng, N.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Xie, T. Dynamic Covalent Polymer Networks: A Molecular Platform for Designing Functions beyond Chemical Recycling and Self-Healing. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1716–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Omar, J.; Ponsford, D.; Dreiss, C.A.; Lee, T.C.; Loh, X.J. Supramolecular Hydrogels: Design Strategies and Contemporary Biomedical Applications. Chem. Asian J. 2022, 17, e202200081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, S.S.; Ji, S.M.; Park, M.J.; Suneetha, M.; Uthappa, U.T. Pectin Based Hydrogels for Drug Delivery Applications: A Mini Review. Gels 2022, 8, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maric, I.; Yang, L.; Li, X.; Santiago, G.M.; Pappas, C.G.; Qiu, X.; Dijksman, J.A.; Mikhailov, K.; van Rijn, P.; Otto, S. Tailorable and Biocompatible Supramolecular-Based Hydrogels Featuring two Dynamic Covalent Chemistries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202216475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Yi, S.; Chen, X. Visible-light/temperature dual-responsive hydrogel constructed by alpha-cyclodextrin and an azobenzene linked surfactant. Soft Matter 2017, 13, 6490–6498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, W.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tian, H. High-Preservation Single-Cell Operation through a Photo-responsive Hydrogel-Nanopipette System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 5157–5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Qin, Z.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Lv, H.; Yang, X. On-demand removable hydrogels based on photolabile cross-linkings as wound dressing materials. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 5669–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kabb, C.P.; O’Bryan, C.S.; Deng, C.C.; Angelini, T.E.; Sumerlin, B.S. Photoreversible Covalent Hydrogels for Soft-Matter Additive Manufacturing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 16793–16801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, K.; An, N.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Hu, X.; Wu, Y.; Wu, F.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Sustained-release of PDGF from PLGA microsphere embedded thermo-sensitive hydrogel promoting wound healing by inhibiting autophagy. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 101405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pedersen, S.L.; Huynh, T.H.; Poschko, P.; Fruergaard, A.S.; Jarlstad Olesen, M.T.; Chen, Y.; Birkedal, H.; Subbiahdoss, G.; Reimhult, E.; Thogersen, J.; et al. Remotely Triggered Liquefaction of Hydrogel Materials. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9145–9155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, M.; Chen, M.; Niu, W.; Winston, D.D.; Cheng, W.; Lei, B. Injectable biodegradation-visual self-healing citrate hydrogel with high tissue penetration for microenvironment-responsive degradation and local tumor therapy. Biomaterials 2020, 261, 120301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kahn, J.S.; Hu, Y.; Willner, I. Stimuli-Responsive DNA-Based Hydrogels: From Basic Principles to Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 680–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, F.; Khan, I.; Chen, J.; Akhtar, K.; Bakhsh, E.M.; Khan, S.B. Emerging Fabrication Strategies of Hydrogels and Its Applications. Gels 2022, 8, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, H.; Jung, Y.; Lee, N.; Lee, I.; Lee, J.H. Nature-Derived Polysaccharide-Based Composite Hydrogels for Promoting Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mantha, S.; Pillai, S.; Khayambashi, P.; Upadhyay, A.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, O.; Pham, H.M.; Tran, S.D. Smart Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Materials 2019, 12, 3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, W.; Meng, Q.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhou, M.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, K. Chitosan Derivatives and Their Application in Biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chelu, M.; Musuc, A.M.; Popa, M.; Calderon Moreno, J.M. Chitosan Hydrogels for Water Purification Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Psarrou, M.; Mitraki, A.; Vamvakaki, M.; Kokotidou, C. Stimuli-Responsive Polysaccharide Hydrogels and Their Composites for Wound Healing Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pandey, P.C.; Shukla, S.; Skoog, S.A.; Boehm, R.D.; Narayan, R.J. Current Advancements in Transdermal Biosensing and Targeted Drug Delivery. Sensors 2019, 19, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mou, D.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhuang, W.; Yang, X. Intra-articular Injection of Chitosan-Based Supramolecular Hydrogel for Osteoarthritis Treatment. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2021, 18, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lei, F.; Zeng, F.; Yu, X.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; Ding, N.; Tian, J.; Li, C. Oral hydrogel nanoemulsion co-delivery system treats inflammatory bowel disease via anti-inflammatory and promoting intestinal mucosa repair. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lou, J.; Hu, W.; Tian, R.; Zhang, H.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L. Optimization and evaluation of a thermoresponsive ophthalmic in situ gel containing curcumin-loaded albumin nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2517–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bedford, J.G.; Caminschi, I.; Wakim, L.M. Intranasal Delivery of a Chitosan-Hydrogel Vaccine Generates Nasal Tissue Resident Memory CD8(+) T Cells That Are Protective against Influenza Virus Infection. Vaccines 2020, 8, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gosecka, M.; Gosecki, M. Antimicrobial Polymer-Based Hydrogels for the Intravaginal Therapies-Engineering Considerations. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rathi, R.; Sanshita; Kumar, A.; Vishvakarma, V.; Huanbutta, K.; Singh, I.; Sangnim, T. Advancements in Rectal Drug Delivery Systems: Clinical Trials, and Patents Perspective. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Taokaew, S.; Kaewkong, W.; Kriangkrai, W. Recent Development of Functional Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shariatinia, Z.; Jalali, A.M. Chitosan-based hydrogels: Preparation, properties and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 194–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Egorov, A.R.; Kirichuk, A.A.; Rubanik, V.V.; Rubanik, V.V., Jr.; Tskhovrebov, A.G.; Kritchenkov, A.S. Chitosan and Its Derivatives: Preparation and Antibacterial Properties. Materials 2023, 16, 6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmadi, F.; Oveisi, Z.; Samani, S.M.; Amoozgar, Z. Chitosan based hydrogels: Characteristics and pharmaceutical applications. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zavyalova, O.; Gajewska, S.; Dąbrowska-Wisłocka, D.; Sionkowska, A. Characteristics of physicochemical and rheological properties of chitosan hydrogels based on selected hydroxy acids. Eng. Biomater. 2021, 24, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pinheiro, B.B.; Saibi, S.; Haroune, L.; Rios, N.S.; Goncalves, L.R.B.; Cabana, H. Genipin and glutaraldehyde based laccase two-layers immobilization with improved properties: New biocatalysts with high potential for enzymatic removal of trace organic contaminants. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2023, 169, 110261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kedzierska, M.; Jamrozy, M.; Drabczyk, A.; Kudlacik-Kramarczyk, S.; Bankosz, M.; Gruca, M.; Potemski, P.; Tyliszczak, B. Analysis of the Influence of Both the Average Molecular Weight and the Content of Crosslinking Agent on Physicochemical Properties of PVP-Based Hydrogels Developed as Innovative Dressings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Drabczyk, A.; Kudlacik-Kramarczyk, S.; Glab, M.; Kedzierska, M.; Jaromin, A.; Mierzwinski, D.; Tyliszczak, B. Physicochemical Investigations of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels Containing Aloe Vera Designed for Biomedical Use. Materials 2020, 13, 3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Farasati Far, B.; Omrani, M.; Naimi Jamal, M.R.; Javanshir, S. Multi-responsive chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled release of vincristine. Commun. Chem. 2023, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jeon, S.; Kim, I.; Jeong, Y.J.; Kim, Y.; Chung, J.J.; Kim, S.W. Comparative Analysis of Antibacterial and Wound Healing Activities of Chitosan and Povidone-Iodine-Based Hydrogels. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2024, 92, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tyliszczak, B.; Drabczyk, A.; Kudlacik, S. Comparison of Hydrogels Based on Commercial Chitosan and Beetosan® Containing Nanosilver. Molecules 2016, 22, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ranjbar, R.; Yousefi, A. Effects of Aloe Vera and Chitosan Nanoparticle Thin-Film Membranes on Wound Healing in Full Thickness Infected Wounds with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Bull. Emerg. Trauma. 2018, 6, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rudko, M.; Urbaniak, T.; Musial, W. Recent Developments in Ion-Sensitive Systems for Pharmaceutical Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reid, I.R.; Gamble, G.D.; Bolland, M.J. Circulating calcium concentrations, vascular disease and mortality: A systematic review. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 279, 524–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Portbury, S.D.; Adlard, P.A. Zinc Signal in Brain Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Vardhan, K.H.; Kumar, P.S.; Panda, R.C. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: Current trends and future perspectives. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 290, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Diacon, A.; Albota, F.; Mocanu, A.; Brincoveanu, O.; Podaru, A.I.; Rotariu, T.; Ahmad, A.A.; Rusen, E.; Toader, G. Dual-Responsive Hydrogels for Mercury Ion Detection and Removal from Wastewater. Gels 2024, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, X.; Cui, W.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y. Supramolecular self-assembly of two-component systems comprising aromatic amides/Schiff base and tartaric acid. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2020, 14, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, L.; Sun, R.; Zheng, R.; Huang, Y. Anions-responsive supramolecular gels: A review. Mater. Des. 2021, 205, 109759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Malik, N.S.; Ahmad, M.; Alqahtani, M.S.; Mahmood, A.; Barkat, K.; Khan, M.T.; Tulain, U.R.; Rashid, A. beta-cyclodextrin chitosan-based hydrogels with tunable pH-responsive properties for controlled release of acyclovir: Design, characterization, safety, and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 1093–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ye, R.; Liu, S.; Zhu, W.; Li, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, and Biomedical Application of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels. Polymers 2023, 15, 2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, X.; Yang, C.; Jian, Y.; Deng, H.; Du, Y.; Shi, X. Ion-responsive chitosan hydrogel actuator inspired by carrotwood seed pod. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 276, 118759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vegad, U.; Patel, M.; Khunt, D.; Zupancic, O.; Chauhan, S.; Paudel, A. pH stimuli-responsive hydrogels from non-cellulosic biopolymers for drug delivery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1270364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Suhail, M.; Ullah, H.; Vu, Q.L.; Khan, A.; Tsai, M.J.; Wu, P.C. Preparation of pH-Responsive Hydrogels Based on Chondroitin Sulfate/Alginate for Oral Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Richter, A.; Paschew, G.; Klatt, S.; Lienig, J.; Arndt, K.F.; Adler, H.P. Review on Hydrogel-based pH Sensors and Microsensors. Sensors 2008, 8, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rizwan, M.; Yahya, R.; Hassan, A.; Yar, M.; Azzahari, A.D.; Selvanathan, V.; Sonsudin, F.; Abouloula, C.N. pH Sensitive Hydrogels in Drug Delivery: Brief History, Properties, Swelling, and Release Mechanism, Material Selection and Applications. Polymers 2017, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ofridam, F.; Tarhini, M.; Lebaz, N.; Gagnière, É.; Mangin, D.; Elaissari, A. pH-sensitive polymers: Classification and some fine potential applications. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 1455–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Woraphatphadung, T.; Sajomsang, W.; Rojanarata, T.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Tonglairoum, P.; Opanasopit, P. Development of Chitosan-Based pH-Sensitive Polymeric Micelles Containing Curcumin for Colon-Targeted Drug Delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ata, S.; Rasool, A.; Islam, A.; Bibi, I.; Rizwan, M.; Azeem, M.K.; Qureshi, A.U.R.; Iqbal, M. Loading of Cefixime to pH sensitive chitosan based hydrogel and investigation of controlled release kinetics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1236–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. El-Mahrouk, G.M.; Aboul-Einien, M.H.; Makhlouf, A.I. Design, Optimization, and Evaluation of a Novel Metronidazole-Loaded Gastro-Retentive pH-Sensitive Hydrogel. AAPS PharmSciTech 2016, 17, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W. pH-responsive chitosan-based film incorporated with alizarin for intelligent packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 102, 105629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tauler Riera, P.; Volterrani, M.; Iellamo, F.; Fallo, F.; Ermolao, A.; Kraemer, W.J.; Ratamess, N.A.; Faigenbaum, A.; Philp, A.; Baar, K. Redox Status. In Encyclopedia of Exercise Medicine in Health and Disease; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 751–753. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cheng, W.; Liu, Y. Redox-responsive hydrogels. In Biopolymer-Based Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 31–60. [Google Scholar]
  82. Abed, H.F.; Abuwatfa, W.H.; Husseini, G.A. Redox-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems: A Chemical Perspective. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, S.; Wei, C.; Xu, Y.; Lu, W. ROS-responsive selenium-containing polyphosphoester nanogels for activated anticancer drug release. Mater. Today Chem. 2018, 9, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, R.; Peng, F.; Cai, J.; Yang, D.; Zhang, P. Redox dual-stimuli responsive drug delivery systems for improving tumor-targeting ability and reducing adverse side effects. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 15, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cao, H.; Duan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, K. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Vu, T.T.; Yadav, S.; Reddy, O.S.; Jo, S.H.; Joo, S.B.; Kim, B.K.; Park, E.J.; Park, S.H.; Lim, K.T. Reduction-Responsive Chitosan-Based Injectable Hydrogels for Enhanced Anticancer Therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jia, P.; Dai, C.; Cao, P.; Sun, D.; Ouyang, R.; Miao, Y. The role of reactive oxygen species in tumor treatment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7740–7750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Huo, M.; Yuan, J.; Tao, L.; Wei, Y. Redox-responsive polymers for drug delivery: From molecular design to applications. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wu, S.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X.; Feng, T.; Wu, L. Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Bioelectronic Sensing: Recent Advances and Applications in Biomedicine and Food Safety. Biosensors 2023, 13, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Andrade, F.; Roca-Melendres, M.M.; Duran-Lara, E.F.; Rafael, D.; Schwartz, S., Jr. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Cancer Treatment: The Role of pH, Light, Ionic Strength and Magnetic Field. Cancers 2021, 13, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Xing, Y.; Zeng, B.; Yang, W. Light responsive hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1075670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tomatsu, I.; Peng, K.; Kros, A. Photoresponsive hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 1257–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shi, Q.; Liu, H.; Tang, D.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, F. Bioactuators based on stimulus-responsive hydrogels and their emerging biomedical applications. NPG Asia Mater. 2019, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, X.; Duan, L.; Kong, M.; Wen, X.; Guan, F.; Ma, S. Applications and Mechanisms of Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels in Traumatic Brain Injury. Gels 2022, 8, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pan, P.; Svirskis, D.; Rees, S.W.P.; Barker, D.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Wu, Z. Photosensitive drug delivery systems for cancer therapy: Mechanisms and applications. J. Control Release 2021, 338, 446–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kasinski, A.; Zielinska-Pisklak, M.; Oledzka, E.; Sobczak, M. Smart Hydrogels-Synthetic Stimuli-Responsive Antitumor Drug Release Systems. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 4541–4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, L.; Scheiger, J.M.; Levkin, P.A. Design and Applications of Photoresponsive Hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1807333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Azagarsamy, M.A.; McKinnon, D.D.; Alge, D.L.; Anseth, K.S. Coumarin-Based Photodegradable Hydrogel: Design, Synthesis, Gelation, and Degradation Kinetics. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Choi, J.R.; Yong, K.W.; Choi, J.Y.; Cowie, A.C. Recent advances in photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechniques 2019, 66, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ji, W.; Wu, Q.; Han, X.; Zhang, W.; Wei, W.; Chen, L.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Photosensitive hydrogels: From structure, mechanisms, design to bioapplications. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 1813–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hong, F.; Qiu, P.; Wang, Y.; Ren, P.; Liu, J.; Zhao, J.; Gou, D. Chitosan-based hydrogels: From preparation to applications, a review. Food Chem. X 2024, 21, 101095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shang, J.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. Chitosan-based electroactive hydrogel. Polymer 2008, 49, 5520–5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bagheri, B.; Zarrintaj, P.; Surwase, S.S.; Baheiraei, N.; Saeb, M.R.; Mozafari, M.; Kim, Y.C.; Park, O.O. Self-gelling electroactive hydrogels based on chitosan-aniline oligomers/agarose for neural tissue engineering with on-demand drug release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 184, 110549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ha, J.H.; Lim, J.H.; Lee, J.M.; Chung, B.G. Electro-Responsive Conductive Blended Hydrogel Patch. Polymers 2023, 15, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kong, L.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Gu, X.; Ding, J.; Lv, Z.; Liu, G.; Liu, X.; Xu, W. Advances in preparation, design strategy and application of electroactive hydrogels. J. Power Sources 2023, 581, 233485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Peers, S.; Montembault, A.; Ladaviere, C. Chitosan hydrogels for sustained drug delivery. J. Control Release 2020, 326, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Del Valle, L.J.; Diaz, A.; Puiggali, J. Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Cellulose, Chitosan, and Protein/Peptide Derivatives. Gels 2017, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Maiz-Fernandez, S.; Perez-Alvarez, L.; Silvan, U.; Vilas-Vilela, J.L.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. pH-Induced 3D Printable Chitosan Hydrogels for Soft Actuation. Polymers 2022, 14, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, K.; Xue, K.; Loh, X.J. Thermo-Responsive Hydrogels: From Recent Progress to Biomedical Applications. Gels 2021, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fan, R.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Song, S.; Zheng, A. Thermosensitive Hydrogels and Advances in Their Application in Disease Therapy. Polymers 2022, 14, 2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Frazar, E.M.; Shah, R.A.; Dziubla, T.D.; Hilt, J.Z. Multifunctional temperature-responsive polymers as advanced biomaterials and beyond. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Huang, H.; Qi, X.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z. Thermo-sensitive hydrogels for delivering biotherapeutic molecules: A review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 990–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liang, H.; Chen, X.; Tan, H. Natural Polymer-Based Hydrogels: From Polymer to Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Taylor, M.J.; Tomlins, P.; Sahota, T.S. Thermoresponsive Gels. Gels 2017, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bellotti, E.; Schilling, A.L.; Little, S.R.; Decuzzi, P. Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels as drug delivery system for the treatment of central nervous system disorders: A review. J. Control Release 2021, 329, 16–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Xu, G.; Zhu, C.; Li, B.; Wang, T.; Wan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Yang, D.; Shen, Y. Improving the Anti-Ovarian Cancer Activity of Docetaxel by Self-Assemble Micelles and Thermosensitive Hydrogel Drug Delivery System. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2020, 16, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ahsan, A.; Farooq, M.A.; Parveen, A. Thermosensitive Chitosan-Based Injectable Hydrogel as an Efficient Anticancer Drug Carrier. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 20450–20460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; El-Dakroury, W.A.; Doghish, A.S.; Tanaka, R. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Smart state of-the-art platforms for cardiac tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1174075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lee, J.H.; Han, W.J.; Jang, H.S.; Choi, H.J. Highly Tough, Biocompatible, and Magneto-Responsive Fe3O4/Laponite/PDMAAm Nanocomposite Hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Y. Magnetic-responsive hydrogels: From strategic design to biomedical applications. J. Control Release 2021, 335, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Xu, Y.; Yin, H.; Chu, J.; Eglin, D.; Serra, T.; Docheva, D. An anisotropic nanocomposite hydrogel guides aligned orientation and enhances tenogenesis of human tendon stem/progenitor cells. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Huang, J.; Liang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Liang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Duan, L.; Liu, W.; Zhu, F.; Bian, L.; et al. Magnetic Enhancement of Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 2200–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Antman-Passig, M.; Shefi, O. Remote Magnetic Orientation of 3D Collagen Hydrogels for Directed Neuronal Regeneration. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2567–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhou, C.; Wang, C.; Xu, K.; Niu, Z.; Zou, S.; Zhang, D.; Qian, Z.; Liao, J.; Xie, J. Hydrogel platform with tunable stiffness based on magnetic nanoparticles cross-linked GelMA for cartilage regeneration and its intrinsic biomechanism. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 25, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Miyazaki, T.; Iwanaga, A.; Shirosaki, Y.; Kawashita, M. In situ synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in chitosan hydrogels as a reaction field: Effect of cross-linking density. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 179, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ghadban, A.; Ahmed, A.S.; Ping, Y.; Ramos, R.; Arfin, N.; Cantaert, B.; Ramanujan, R.V.; Miserez, A. Bioinspired pH and magnetic responsive catechol-functionalized chitosan hydrogels with tunable elastic properties. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fu, X.; Hosta-Rigau, L.; Chandrawati, R.; Cui, J. Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Particles, Films, and Hydrogels for Drug Delivery. Chem 2018, 4, 2084–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Cao, Z.Q.; Wang, G.J. Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Materials: Particles, Films, and Bulk Gels. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 1398–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cao, J.; Yuan, P.; Wu, B.; Liu, Y.; Hu, C. Advances in the Research and Application of Smart-Responsive Hydrogels in Disease Treatment. Gels 2023, 9, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Pourjavadi, A.; Heydarpour, R.; Tehrani, Z.M. Multi-stimuli-responsive hydrogels and their medical applications. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 15705–15717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, D.; Xu, W.; Liu, H. Fabrication of chitosan functionalized dual stimuli-responsive injectable nanogel to control delivery of doxorubicin. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2023, 301, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; Doghish, A.S.; Zewail, M.B.; Abdelfatah, A.M.; Noshy, M.; Mohammed, O.A.; El-Dakroury, W.A. Smart/stimuli-responsive chitosan/gelatin and other polymeric macromolecules natural hydrogels vs. synthetic hydrogels systems for brain tissue engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yavari Maroufi, L.; Ghorbani, M. Injectable chitosan-quince seed gum hydrogels encapsulated with curcumin loaded-halloysite nanotubes designed for tissue engineering application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. McCarthy, P.C.; Zhang, Y.; Abebe, F. Recent Applications of Dual-Stimuli Responsive Chitosan Hydrogel Nanocomposites as Drug Delivery Tools. Molecules 2021, 26, 4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Garshasbi, H.; Salehi, S.; Naghib, S.M.; Ghorbanzadeh, S.; Zhang, W. Stimuli-responsive injectable chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled drug delivery systems. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1126774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Madivoli, E.S.; Schwarte, J.V.; Kareru, P.G.; Gachanja, A.N.; Fromm, K.M. Stimuli-Responsive and Antibacterial Cellulose-Chitosan Hydrogels Containing Polydiacetylene Nanosheets. Polymers 2023, 15, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ma, W.; Hua, D.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Bio-based stimuli-responsive materials for biomedical applications. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kaur, M.; Sharma, A.; Puri, V.; Aggarwal, G.; Maman, P.; Huanbutta, K.; Nagpal, M.; Sangnim, T. Chitosan-Based Polymer Blends for Drug Delivery Systems. Polymers 2023, 15, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Grubbs, H.; Manna, B. Wound Physiology; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  140. Pazyar, N.; Houshmand, G.; Yaghoobi, R.; Hemmati, A.A.; Zeineli, Z.; Ghorbanzadeh, B. Wound healing effects of topical Vitamin K: A randomized controlled trial. Indian. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 51, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Jarbrink, K.; Ni, G.; Sonnergren, H.; Schmidtchen, A.; Pang, C.; Bajpai, R.; Car, J. Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: A protocol for a systematic review. Syst. Rev. 2016, 5, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Che, X.; Zhao, T.; Hu, J.; Yang, K.; Ma, N.; Li, A.; Sun, Q.; Ding, C.; Ding, Q. Application of Chitosan-Based Hydrogel in Promoting Wound Healing: A Review. Polymers 2024, 16, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Feng, P.; Luo, Y.; Ke, C.; Qiu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Hou, R.; Xu, L.; Wu, S. Chitosan-Based Functional Materials for Skin Wound Repair: Mechanisms and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 650598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Aliakbar Ahovan, Z.; Esmaeili, Z.; Eftekhari, B.S.; Khosravimelal, S.; Alehosseini, M.; Orive, G.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Pal Singh Chauhan, N.; Janmey, P.A.; Hashemi, A.; et al. Antibacterial smart hydrogels: New hope for infectious wound management. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 17, 100499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Klosinski, K.K.; Wach, R.A.; Kruczkowska, W.; Duda, L.; Kolat, D.; Kaluzinska-Kolat, Z.; Arkuszewski, P.T.; Pasieka, Z.W. Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogels for Effective Wound Healing-An Animal Study. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Li, C.; Qin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, F.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. A functional chitosan-based hydrogel as a wound dressing and drug delivery system in the treatment of wound healing. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 7533–7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yu, Q.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J.; Liang, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; Ma, B.; Bianco, A.; Ge, S.; Shao, J. A multifunctional chitosan-based hydrogel with self-healing, antibacterial, and immunomodulatory effects as wound dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chen, R.; Hao, Y.; Francesco, S.; Mao, X.; Huang, W.C. A chitosan-based antibacterial hydrogel with injectable and self-healing capabilities. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2024, 6, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Han, W.; Chen, C.; Yang, K.; Wang, H.; Xia, H.; Zhao, Y.; Teng, Y.; Feng, G.; Chen, Y.M. Hyaluronic acid and chitosan-based injectable and self-healing hydrogel with inherent antibacterial and antioxidant bioactivities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 227, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Tatarusanu, S.M.; Sava, A.; Profire, B.S.; Pinteala, T.; Jitareanu, A.; Iacob, A.T.; Lupascu, F.; Simionescu, N.; Rosca, I.; Profire, L. New Smart Bioactive and Biomimetic Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Wounds Care Management. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhu, L.; Bratlie, K.M. pH sensitive methacrylated chitosan hydrogels with tunable physical and chemical properties. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 132, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pinho, E.; Machado, S.; Soares, G. Smart Hydrogel for the pH-Selective Drug Delivery of Antimicrobial Compounds. Macromol. Symp. 2019, 385, 1800182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Huang, Y.; Mu, L.; Zhao, X.; Han, Y.; Guo, B. Bacterial Growth-Induced Tobramycin Smart Release Self-Healing Hydrogel for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Burn Wound Healing. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 13022–13036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Khan, M.U.A.; Iqbal, I.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Razak, S.I.A.; Raza, M.A.; Sajjad, A.; Jabeen, F.; Riduan Mohamad, M.; Jusoh, N. Development of Antibacterial, Degradable and pH-Responsive Chitosan/Guar Gum/Polyvinyl Alcohol Blended Hydrogels for Wound Dressing. Molecules 2021, 26, 5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Liu, Y.; Zhou, A.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Cheng, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wu, X.; Chen, K.; Ning, X. A photoactive self-healing carboxymethyl chitosan-based hydrogel for accelerated infected wound healing through simultaneously modulating multiple critical tissue repair factors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mai, B.; Jia, M.; Liu, S.; Sheng, Z.; Li, M.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P. Smart Hydrogel-Based DVDMS/bFGF Nanohybrids for Antibacterial Phototherapy with Multiple Damaging Sites and Accelerated Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 10156–10169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Nguyen, T.H.M.; Abueva, C.; Ho, H.V.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, B.T. In vitro and in vivo acute response towards injectable thermosensitive chitosan/TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber hydrogel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 180, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ma, M.; Zhong, Y.; Jiang, X. An injectable photothermally active antibacterial composite hydroxypropyl chitin hydrogel for promoting the wound healing process through photobiomodulation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 4567–4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Qureshi, M.A.; Khatoon, F. In Vitro Study of Temperature and pH-Responsive Gentamycin Sulphate-Loaded Chitosan-Based Hydrogel Films for Wound Dressing Applications. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2014, 54, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. DiSabato, D.J.; Quan, N.; Godbout, J.P. Neuroinflammation: The devil is in the details. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139 (Suppl. S2), 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Danon, J.J.; Reekie, T.A.; Kassiou, M. Challenges and Opportunities in Central Nervous System Drug Discovery. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Achar, A.; Myers, R.; Ghosh, C. Drug Delivery Challenges in Brain Disorders across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Novel Methods and Future Considerations for Improved Therapy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gholizadeh, H.; Cheng, S.; Pozzoli, M.; Messerotti, E.; Traini, D.; Young, P.; Kourmatzis, A.; Ong, H.X. Smart thermosensitive chitosan hydrogel for nasal delivery of ibuprofen to treat neurological disorders. Expert. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Chatzitaki, A.T.; Jesus, S.; Karavasili, C.; Andreadis, D.; Fatouros, D.G.; Borges, O. Chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles for the nasal delivery of ropinirole hydrochloride: In vitro and ex vivo evaluation of efficacy and safety. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 589, 119776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Khan, S.; Patil, K.; Bobade, N.; Yeole, P.; Gaikwad, R. Formulation of intranasal mucoadhesive temperature-mediated in situ gel containing ropinirole and evaluation of brain targeting efficiency in rats. J. Drug Target. 2010, 18, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Liu, Y.; Hsu, Y.H.; Huang, A.P.; Hsu, S.H. Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Network of Hyaluronan and Chitosan Self-Healing Hydrogels for Central Nervous System Repair. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 40108–40120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Almuhayawi, M.S.; Ramadan, W.S.; Harakeh, S.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Bharali, D.J.; Mousa, S.A.; Almuhayawi, S.M. The potential role of pomegranate and its nano-formulations on cerebral neurons in aluminum chloride induced Alzheimer rat model. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1710–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Li, Z.; Mei, J. Resveratrol-loaded selenium/chitosan nano-flowers alleviate glucolipid metabolism disorder-associated cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Wilson, B.; Samanta, M.K.; Santhi, K.; Kumar, K.P.; Ramasamy, M.; Suresh, B. Chitosan nanoparticles as a new delivery system for the anti-Alzheimer drug tacrine. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sahin, A.; Yoyen-Ermis, D.; Caban-Toktas, S.; Horzum, U.; Aktas, Y.; Couvreur, P.; Esendagli, G.; Capan, Y. Evaluation of brain-targeted chitosan nanoparticles through blood-brain barrier cerebral microvessel endothelial cells. J. Microencapsul. 2017, 34, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Rajamanickam, G.; Manju, S.L. Formulation and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles loaded with neuroprotective flavonoid from Phyllanthus niruri Linn. Macromol. Res. 2023, 31, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Iyer, M.; Elangovan, A.; Sennimalai, R.; Babu, H.W.S.; Thiruvenkataswamy, S.; Krishnan, J.; Yadav, M.K.; Gopalakrishnan, A.V.; Narayanasamy, A.; Vellingiri, B. Chitosan—An alternative drug delivery approach for neurodegenerative diseases. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 7, 100460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Xu, F.; Dawson, C.; Lamb, M.; Mueller, E.; Stefanek, E.; Akbari, M.; Hoare, T. Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering: Addressing Key Design Needs Toward Clinical Translation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 849831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sahranavard, M.; Zamanian, A.; Ghorbani, F.; Shahrezaee, M.H. A critical review on three dimensional-printed chitosan hydrogels for development of tissue engineering. Bioprinting 2020, 17, e00063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chaudhary, S.; Chakraborty, E. Hydrogel based tissue engineering and its future applications in personalized disease modeling and regenerative therapy. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chan, B.P.; Leong, K.W. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: General approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur. Spine J. 2008, 17 (Suppl. S4), 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Gaharwar, A.K.; Singh, I.; Khademhosseini, A. Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 686–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Tamburaci, S.; Tihminlioglu, F. Development of Si doped nano hydroxyapatite reinforced bilayer chitosan nanocomposite barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 128, 112298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Dehghani Nazhvani, F.; Mohammadi Amirabad, L.; Azari, A.; Namazi, H.; Hosseinzadeh, S.; Samanipour, R.; Khojasteh, A.; Golchin, A.; Hashemi, S. Effects of in vitro low oxygen tension preconditioning of buccal fat pad stem cells on in Vivo articular cartilage tissue repair. Life Sci. 2021, 280, 119728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Cheng, Y.; Nada, A.A.; Valmikinathan, C.M.; Lee, P.; Liang, D.; Yu, X.; Kumbar, S.G. In situ gelling polysaccharide-based hydrogel for cell and drug delivery in tissue engineering. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 131, 39934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yuan, F.Z.; Wang, H.F.; Guan, J.; Fu, J.N.; Yang, M.; Zhang, J.Y.; Chen, Y.R.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.K. Fabrication of Injectable Chitosan-Chondroitin Sulfate Hydrogel Embedding Kartogenin-Loaded Microspheres as an Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery System for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Hu, M.; Yang, J.; Xu, J. Structural and biological investigation of chitosan/hyaluronic acid with silanized-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as an injectable reinforced interpenetrating network hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Huang, Y.Z.; Ji, Y.R.; Kang, Z.W.; Li, F.; Ge, S.F.; Yang, D.P.; Ruan, J.; Fan, X.Q. Integrating eggshell-derived CaCO3/MgO nanocomposites and chitosan into a biomimetic scaffold for bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lavanya, K.; Chandran, S.V.; Balagangadharan, K.; Selvamurugan, N. Temperature- and pH-responsive chitosan-based injectable hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 111, 110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Zhao, C.; Qazvini, N.T.; Sadati, M.; Zeng, Z.; Huang, S.; De La Lastra, A.L.; Zhang, L.; Feng, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, B.; et al. A pH-Triggered, Self-Assembled, and Bioprintable Hybrid Hydrogel Scaffold for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Based Bone Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 8749–8762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Niranjan, R.; Koushik, C.; Saravanan, S.; Moorthi, A.; Vairamani, M.; Selvamurugan, N. A novel injectable temperature-sensitive zinc doped chitosan/beta-glycerophosphate hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 54, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kazemi-Aghdam, F.; Jahed, V.; Dehghan-Niri, M.; Ganji, F.; Vasheghani-Farahani, E. Injectable chitosan hydrogel embedding modified halloysite nanotubes for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 269, 118311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Hasanzadeh, E.; Seifalian, A.; Mellati, A.; Saremi, J.; Asadpour, S.; Enderami, S.E.; Nekounam, H.; Mahmoodi, N. Injectable hydrogels in central nervous system: Unique and novel platforms for promoting extracellular matrix remodeling and tissue engineering. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 20, 100614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sood, N.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mehta, S.; Mehta, A. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 758–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Fan, Z.; Liu, Z.; Xie, X.; Guan, J. Regulating myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells using thermosensitive hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2015, 26, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Liu, M.; Zeng, X.; Ma, C.; Yi, H.; Ali, Z.; Mou, X.; Li, S.; Deng, Y.; He, N. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res. 2017, 5, 17014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Tang, P. Recent Advances on Magnetic Sensitive Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Grimaudo, M.A.; Krishnakumar, G.S.; Giusto, E.; Furlani, F.; Bassi, G.; Rossi, A.; Molinari, F.; Lista, F.; Montesi, M.; Panseri, S. Bioactive injectable hydrogels for on demand molecule/cell delivery and for tissue regeneration in the central nervous system. Acta Biomater. 2022, 140, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Guo, C.; Kaufman, L.J. Flow and magnetic field induced collagen alignment. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Singh, Y.P.; Moses, J.C.; Bhardwaj, N.; Mandal, B.B. Injectable hydrogels: A new paradigm for osteochondral tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 5499–5529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Khaing, Z.Z.; Ehsanipour, A.; Hofstetter, C.P.; Seidlits, S.K. Injectable Hydrogels for Spinal Cord Repair: A Focus on Swelling and Intraspinal Pressure. Cells Tissues Organs 2016, 202, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Liu, F.D.; Duan, H.M.; Hao, F.; Zhao, W.; Gao, Y.D.; Hao, P.; Yang, Z.Y.; Li, X.G. Biomimetic chitosan scaffolds with long-term controlled release of nerve growth factor repairs 20-mm-long sciatic nerve defects in rats. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1146–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Mu, M.; Li, X.; Tong, A.; Guo, G. Multi-functional chitosan-based smart hydrogels mediated biomedical application. Expert. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Takeya, H.; Itai, S.; Kimura, H.; Kurashina, Y.; Amemiya, T.; Nagoshi, N.; Iwamoto, T.; Sato, K.; Shibata, S.; Matsumoto, M.; et al. Schwann cell-encapsulated chitosan-collagen hydrogel nerve conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration in rodent sciatic nerve defect models. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Guo, Q.; Liu, C.; Hai, B.; Ma, T.; Zhang, W.; Tan, J.; Fu, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Song, C. Chitosan conduits filled with simvastatin/Pluronic F-127 hydrogel promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2018, 106, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. El Soury, M.; Garcia-Garcia, O.D.; Tarulli, I.; Chato-Astrain, J.; Perroteau, I.; Geuna, S.; Raimondo, S.; Gambarotta, G.; Carriel, V. Chitosan conduits enriched with fibrin-collagen hydrogel with or without adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the repair of 15-mm-long sciatic nerve defect. Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Boido, M.; Ghibaudi, M.; Gentile, P.; Favaro, E.; Fusaro, R.; Tonda-Turo, C. Chitosan-based hydrogel to support the paracrine activity of mesenchymal stem cells in spinal cord injury treatment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Stanzione, A.; Polini, A.; La Pesa, V.; Quattrini, A.; Romano, A.; Gigli, G.; Moroni, L.; Gervaso, F. Thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogels supporting motor neuron-like NSC-34 cell differentiation. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 7492–7503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Tiwari, G.; Tiwari, R.; Sriwastawa, B.; Bhati, L.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, P.; Bannerjee, S.K. Drug delivery systems: An updated review. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Gao, J.; Karp, J.M.; Langer, R.; Joshi, N. The Future of Drug Delivery. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Chehelgerdi, M.; Chehelgerdi, M.; Allela, O.Q.B.; Pecho, R.D.C.; Jayasankar, N.; Rao, D.P.; Thamaraikani, T.; Vasanthan, M.; Viktor, P.; Lakshmaiya, N.; et al. Progressing nanotechnology to improve targeted cancer treatment: Overcoming hurdles in its clinical implementation. Mol. Cancer 2023, 22, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Khan, S.; Akhtar, N.; Minhas, M.U.; Badshah, S.F. pH/Thermo-Dual Responsive Tunable In Situ Cross-Linkable Depot Injectable Hydrogels Based on Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide)/Carboxymethyl Chitosan with Potential of Controlled Localized and Systemic Drug Delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 2019, 20, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Chalabi-Dchar, M.; Fenouil, T.; Machon, C.; Vincent, A.; Catez, F.; Marcel, V.; Mertani, H.C.; Saurin, J.C.; Bouvet, P.; Guitton, J.; et al. A novel view on an old drug, 5-fluorouracil: An unexpected RNA modifier with intriguing impact on cancer cell fate. NAR Cancer 2021, 3, zcab032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Sritharan, S.; Sivalingam, N. A comprehensive review on time-tested anticancer drug doxorubicin. Life Sci. 2021, 278, 119527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Qian, Z.; Zhao, N.; Wang, C.; Yuan, W. Injectable self-healing polysaccharide hydrogel loading CuS and pH-responsive DOX@ZIF-8 nanoparticles for synergistic photothermal-photodynamic-chemo therapy of cancer. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 127, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Ahmed, Z.; LoGiudice, K.; Mays, G.; Schorr, A.; Rowey, R.; Yang, H.; Trivedi, S.; Srivastava, V. Increasing Chemotherapeutic Efficacy Using pH-Modulating and Doxorubicin-Releasing Injectable Chitosan-Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 45626–45639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Qu, J.; Zhao, X.; Ma, P.X.; Guo, B. pH-responsive self-healing injectable hydrogel based on N-carboxyethyl chitosan for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Wang, S.; Zheng, H.; Zhou, L.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q. Injectable redox and light responsive MnO2 hybrid hydrogel for simultaneous melanoma therapy and multidrug-resistant bacteria-infected wound healing. Biomaterials 2020, 260, 120314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Meng, D.; Guo, L.; Shi, D.; Sun, X.; Shang, M.; Zhou, X.; Li, J. Charge-conversion and ultrasound-responsive O-carboxymethyl chitosan nanodroplets for controlled drug delivery. Nanomedicine 2019, 14, 2549–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Ekinci, E.; Rohondia, S.; Khan, R.; Dou, Q.P. Repurposing Disulfiram as An Anti-Cancer Agent: Updated Review on Literature and Patents. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Bazzazzadeh, A.; Dizaji, B.F.; Kianinejad, N.; Nouri, A.; Irani, M. Fabrication of poly(acrylic acid) grafted-chitosan/polyurethane/magnetic MIL-53 metal organic framework composite core-shell nanofibers for co-delivery of temozolomide and paclitaxel against glioblastoma cancer cells. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 587, 119674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Heragh, B.K.; Taherinezhad, H.; Mahdavinia, G.R.; Javanshir, S.; Labib, P.; Ghasemsolb, S. pH-responsive co-delivery of doxorubicin and saffron via cross-linked chitosan/laponite RD nanoparticles for enhanced-chemotherapy. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 34, 104956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Sabourian, P.; Ji, J.; Lotocki, V.; Moquin, A.; Hanna, R.; Frounchi, M.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Facile design of autogenous stimuli-responsive chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for efficient small molecules to protein delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 7275–7287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Li, N.; Lin, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Li, R.; Wang, C.; Zhao, C.; Lu, L.; Zhou, C.; Tian, J.; et al. Temperature- and pH-responsive injectable chitosan hydrogels loaded with doxorubicin and curcumin as long-lasting release platforms for the treatment of solid tumors. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1043939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Baghbani, F.; Chegeni, M.; Moztarzadeh, F.; Hadian-Ghazvini, S.; Raz, M. Novel ultrasound-responsive chitosan/perfluorohexane nanodroplets for image-guided smart delivery of an anticancer agent: Curcumin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 74, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Aycan, D.; Alemdar, N. Development of pH-responsive chitosan-based hydrogel modified with bone ash for controlled release of amoxicillin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 184, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Lin, Y.H.; Chang, C.H.; Wu, Y.S.; Hsu, Y.M.; Chiou, S.F.; Chen, Y.J. Development of pH-responsive chitosan/heparin nanoparticles for stomach-specific anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 3332–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Brutzkus, J.C.; Shahrokhi, M.; Varacallo, M. Naproxen; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  224. Jiang, K.; Zhou, X.; He, T. The synthesis of bacterial cellulose-chitosan zwitterionic hydrogels with pH responsiveness for drug release mechanism of the naproxen. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Wang, Q.; Bao, Y. Nanodelivery of natural isothiocyanates as a cancer therapeutic. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 167, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Cao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Song, Q.; Meng, Z.; Wu, X.; Xu, K. Inhibition of autophagy potentiates the anti-metastasis effect of phenethyl isothiocyanate through JAK2/STAT3 pathway in lung cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2018, 57, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Haloi, P.; Chawla, S.; Konkimalla, V.B. Thermosensitive smart hydrogel of PEITC ameliorates the therapeutic efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 181, 106367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Fea, A.M.; Novarese, C.; Caselgrandi, P.; Boscia, G. Glaucoma Treatment and Hydrogel: Current Insights and State of the Art. Gels 2022, 8, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Storgaard, L.; Tran, T.L.; Freiberg, J.C.; Hauser, A.S.; Kolko, M. Glaucoma Clinical Research: Trends in Treatment Strategies and Drug Development. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 733080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Prum, B.E., Jr.; Rosenberg, L.F.; Gedde, S.J.; Mansberger, S.L.; Stein, J.D.; Moroi, S.E.; Herndon, L.W., Jr.; Lim, M.C.; Williams, R.D. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, P41–P111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Belhassen, M.; Laforest, L.; Licaj, I.; Van Ganse, E. Early adherence to anti-glaucoma therapy: An observational study. Therapie 2016, 71, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Das, S.; Saha, D.; Majumdar, S.; Giri, L. Imaging Methods for the Assessment of a Complex Hydrogel as an Ocular Drug Delivery System for Glaucoma Treatment: Opportunities and Challenges in Preclinical Evaluation. Mol. Pharm. 2022, 19, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Yadav, K.S.; Rajpurohit, R.; Sharma, S. Glaucoma: Current treatment and impact of advanced drug delivery systems. Life Sci. 2019, 221, 362–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Cheng, Y.H.; Tsai, T.H.; Jhan, Y.Y.; Chiu, A.W.; Tsai, K.L.; Chien, C.S.; Chiou, S.H.; Liu, C.J. Thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogel as a topical ocular drug delivery system of latanoprost for glaucoma treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 144, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Pakzad, Y.; Fathi, M.; Omidi, Y.; Mozafari, M.; Zamanian, A. Synthesis and characterization of timolol maleate-loaded quaternized chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel: A transparent topical ocular delivery system for the treatment of glaucoma. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Bhalla, N.; Jolly, P.; Formisano, N.; Estrela, P. Introduction to biosensors. Essays Biochem. 2016, 60, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kim, J.; Jeerapan, I.; Imani, S.; Cho, T.N.; Bandodkar, A.; Cinti, S.; Mercier, P.P.; Wang, J. Noninvasive Alcohol Monitoring Using a Wearable Tattoo-Based Iontophoretic-Biosensing System. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Xia, S.; Song, S.; Jia, F.; Gao, G. A flexible, adhesive and self-healable hydrogel-based wearable strain sensor for human motion and physiological signal monitoring. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 4638–4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Li, J.; Ding, Q.; Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Gui, X.; Li, C.; Hu, N.; Tao, K.; Wu, J. Engineering Smart Composite Hydrogels for Wearable Disease Monitoring. Nanomicro Lett. 2023, 15, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Carpa, R.; Remizovschi, A.; Culda, C.A.; Butiuc-Keul, A.L. Inherent and Composite Hydrogels as Promising Materials to Limit Antimicrobial Resistance. Gels 2022, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Kancı Bozoğlan, B.; Duman, O.; Tunç, S. Smart antifungal thermosensitive chitosan/carboxymethylcellulose/scleroglucan/montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogels for onychomycosis treatment. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 610, 125600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Hemmingsen, L.M.; Julin, K.; Ahsan, L.; Basnet, P.; Johannessen, M.; Skalko-Basnet, N. Chitosomes-In-Chitosan Hydrogel for Acute Skin Injuries: Prevention and Infection Control. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Frade, M.L.; de Annunzio, S.R.; Calixto, G.M.F.; Victorelli, F.D.; Chorilli, M.; Fontana, C.R. Assessment of Chitosan-Based Hydrogel and Photodynamic Inactivation against Propionibacterium acnes. Molecules 2018, 23, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Bodor, G.S. Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Damage. EJIFCC 2016, 27, 95–111. [Google Scholar]
  245. Tohidi, H.; Maleki-Jirsaraei, N.; Simchi, A.; Mohandes, F.; Emami, Z.; Fassina, L.; Naro, F.; Conti, B.; Barbagallo, F. An Electroconductive, Thermosensitive, and Injectable Chitosan/Pluronic/Gold-Decorated Cellulose Nanofiber Hydrogel as an Efficient Carrier for Regeneration of Cardiac Tissue. Materials 2022, 15, 5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.