Next Article in Journal
Easy-to-Apply Hydrogel Patch for Field Treatment and Monitoring of Equine Wounds
Previous Article in Journal
Formulation of Caffeine–Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Complex in Hydrogel for Skin Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wound Healing Potential of Herbal Hydrogel Formulations of Cedrus brevifolia Extracts in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Lab to Shelf: Gelatin-Based pH Sensors Revolutionizing Food Packaging

1
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qinghai Normal University, 38 Wusi West Road Xining, Xining 810008, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology and Application of Environmental Functional Materials in Qinghai, Xining 810008, China
Gels 2025, 11(5), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050327
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Revised: 19 April 2025 / Accepted: 24 April 2025 / Published: 27 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Gel-Based Materials and Coatings with Enhanced Bioactivity)

Abstract

:
The development of multifunctional smart food packaging has garnered considerable attention in research. Gelatin exhibits outstanding characteristics, featuring remarkable gel strength, molecular binding affinity, excellent colloidal dispersibility, low solution viscosity, sustained dispersion stability, and significant water retention properties. Gelatin-based film is ideally suited for the developing simple, portable, and rapid pH sensors, owing to its satisfactory biocompatibility, biodegradability, biosafety, affordability, and facilitation of easy handling and usage. This paper aims to explore the challenges and opportunities relating to gelatin-based pH sensors. It begins by outlining the sources, classifications, and functional properties of gelatin, followed by an analysis of the current research landscape and future trends related to intelligent indicators and active carriers. Subsequently, potential research directions for gelatin-based pH sensors are proposed. Using a literature analysis, it can be concluded that novel gelatin-based smart packaging represents the future of food packaging. It is hoped that the paper can provide some basic information for the development and application of gelatin-based smart packaging.

1. Introduction

The food supply chain, spanning from production to consumption, faces numerous challenges, encompassing microbial contamination, chemical residues, and issues related to both personal and environmental hygiene [1]. Food safety represents a critical global public health concern [2,3], with multiple critical points in the production process posing potential risks of contamination or unsafe practices. Ensuring proper storage, physicochemical and microbial stability, and appropriate cooking methods are essential control measures to safeguard food safety [4]. Inadequate assessments of food quality pose significant risks to human health and contributing to food waste. To address these challenges, robust monitoring systems are required to detect contaminants such as pesticides, antioxidants, heavy metals, and bacterial pathogens, among others [5]. Food packaging play a crucial role in reducing food waste, as it is estimated that approximately 130 million tons of food are lost annually worldwide due to inadequate packaging [5]. As improved living standards continue to reshape consumer demands, the functionality of packaging has expanded significantly beyond their traditional role of protection [6,7,8]. Among the emerging trends, the development of multifunctional smart food packaging have garnered considerable attention in research [9,10,11,12,13], reflecting the growing need for innovative solutions to enhance food safety and sustainability.
Smart packaging are designed to provide a range of advanced functionalities, including detection, monitoring, tracking, and communication, while simultaneously offering real-time information and alerts regarding potential threats to food quality [14]. Despite these technological advancements, smart packaging currently represents only 5% of the global packaging market, indicating significant untapped potential for further development and commercialization [15]. Among the diverse functionalities being explored, real-time monitoring of food quality changes has garnered considerable research interest [16,17]. It is widely recognized that food spoilage often involves the production of specific acidic or alkaline compounds, leading to alterations in the internal pH of the packaging environment. As a result, the development of pH sensors has emerged as a promising non-destructive approach for detecting and tracking changes in the internal conditions of packaged food. By exhibiting visible color changes, these materials provide consumers with essential information related to food storage and preservation, such as ripeness, gas or volatile compound content, temperature, and overall food quality [18,19]. The primary objective of these innovations is to enhance food safety, improve product quality, and extend shelf life, thereby addressing critical challenges in the food supply chain.
Global statistics indicate that slaughterhouses produce approximately 10 million tons of biomass waste annually, presenting significant challenges for resource management and environmental sustainability [20]. The extraction and reuse of gelatin from this biomass waste have emerged as a viable strategy to address both resource inefficiency and environmental pollution [21]. Gelatin, a hydrolyzed derivative of collagen sourced from animal skin, bones, and connective tissues, contains all essential amino acids except tryptophan [22]. Compared to natural collagen, gelatin is widely regarded as one of the most versatile biomaterials due to its polar structure, readily available tripeptides, and high solubility [23]. Its cost-effectiveness, abundance, eco-friendliness, and biocompatibility have led to its extensive use in various industries, including food [24,25,26], cosmetics [27,28,29], pharmaceuticals [30,31,32,33,34,35], and biomedicine [36,37,38,39]. In addition to these applications, gelatin films exhibit exceptional gas and oil barrier properties, as well as biodegradability. Unlike plant protein-based films, which often exhibit coloration, gelatin films are colorless and transparent, making them particularly suitable for pH sensors. Their transparency ensures that they do not interfere with the color changes in pH indicators, a critical feature for effective monitoring [40]. The development of gelatin-based pH-sensors are expected to align with and meet the increasingly stringent regulatory requirements of global markets.

2. Classification, Sources and Functional Properties of Gelatin

2.1. Sources of Gelatin

Gelatin is primarily sourced from biomass waste generated by mammals, poultry, and fish. Currently, approximately 46% of the gelatin available on the global market is derived from pig skin and cartilage [41], followed by bovine hides and bones, as illustrated in Table 1. Compared to bovine gelatin, pig gelatin contains higher concentrations of glycine (Gly), proline (Pro), and arginine (Arg). Mammalian gelatin is particularly preferred for its superior gelling, such as gel strength and viscosity, as well as its excellent film-forming capabilities, which surpass those of gelatin from other sources [42]. However, the use of mammalian gelatin is subject to certain religious and cultural restrictions, limiting its applicability in specific markets [43].
In recent years, the extraction of gelatin from fish and other marine species has gained considerable attention [44,45,46,47,48]. Fish gelatin exhibits functional properties comparable to those of pig gelatin, positioning it as a promising alternative. However, fish gelatin contains lower levels of amino acids, such as proline (Pro) and hydroxyproline (Hyp), which results in reduced thermal stability compared to mammalian gelatin [49]. Additionally, fish gelatin demonstrates inferior gelling properties and rheological performance relative to mammalian gelatin [50]. Similarly, poultry gelatin closely resembles mammalian gelatin in terms of amino acid composition, secondary structure, and molecular weight [51], making it a viable and sustainable alternative for various industrial applications.
The global gelatin market is projected to grow significantly, with an estimated value of USD 5 billion by 2025 and USD 6.7 billion by 2027, reflecting an annual growth rate of 9.29% [52]. This growth underscores the increasing demand for gelatin across diverse industries and highlights the importance of developing sustainable and versatile sources to meet market needs.

2.2. Classification of Gelatin

Gelatin is a water-soluble polypeptide obtained through the hydrolysis of collagen via acid, alkali, or enzymatic processes [53]. Its structure is characterized by repeating amino acid sequences such as Gly-Pro-Y, Gly-X-Hyp, and Gly-Pro-Hyp [54]. The structural integrity of gelatin is primarily maintained by intra- and inter-molecular hydrogen bonding, along with electrostatic interactions. During gelatin production, raw materials undergo treatment with dilute acids or alkalis, which breaks down the native collagen into single α-chains, covalently bonded β-chains (comprising two α-chains), and γ-chains (comprising three α-chains). The extraction process parameters, including pH, temperature, and extraction time, significantly influence the molecular structure and weight of gelatin, thereby determining its functional properties and applications [55]. Based on the extraction method employed, gelatin can be classified into two types: type A (produced via acid hydrolysis) and type B (produced via alkali hydrolysis). The transformation of collagen into gelatin involves significant alterations in the amino acid composition, resulting in marked differences between gelatin and native collagen. During the extraction of type B gelatin, alkali treatment promotes the deamination of glutamine into glutamic acid (Glu) and asparagine into aspartic acid (Asp). Consequently, type B gelatin contains notably higher concentrations of Glu and Asp than type A gelatin [41]. The isoelectric point (pI) of gelatin also varies depending on the extraction method, with type A gelatin exhibiting a pI between 8 and 9, while type B gelatin has a pI ranging from 4.8 to 5.4 [54].

2.3. Properties of Gelatin

Gelatin is primarily formed from 18 intricate amino acids, among which Gly, Pro, and Hyp collectively account for nearly 57% of its composition. Its molecular structure comprises both single and double helical configurations, which exhibit pronounced hydrophilic characteristics. These structural features contribute to its remarkable gel-forming capacity and strong binding affinity [56]. Gelatin exhibits desired biocompatibility due to the presence of the cell-adhesive Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence within its molecular structure [57]. The stability of gelatin’s triple-helical conformation is predominantly maintained by Hyp, where the hydrogen atom of Gly forms intramolecular hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl oxygen, reinforcing the helical framework [43,58]. Additionally, water molecules facilitate further stabilization by forming hydrogen bonds with Hyp, enhancing the mechanical strength and structural integrity of films. The gelatin network is further stabilized by abundant functional groups (–NH2, –COOH, –OH) [59,60], which contribute to its crosslinked structure, endowing the gelatin-based materials with appropriate stability against gases and moisture. Moreover, approximately 11% of amino acid are consists of hydrophobic residues (Ala, Met, Val, Leu, Ile), whose interactions significantly influence the gel point and gel strength [43]. As a polyampholyte, gelatin contains 13% cationic (Arg, Lys) and 12% anionic (Asp, Glu) amino acids, enabling strong electrostatic interactions. Environmental factors such as temperature, ionic strength, and pH influence conformational flexibility of gelatin, allowing for rapid structural transitions between ordered helices and disordered coils. This adaptability results in the dynamic self-adjustment of gelatin’s morphology and physicochemical properties, granting the gelatin-based materials exceptional flexibility, reversibility, and conformability to diverse surfaces.
Gelatin exhibits outstanding characteristics, featuring remarkable gel strength, molecular binding affinity, excellent colloidal dispersibility, low solution viscosity, sustained dispersion stability, and significant water retention properties [56]. Gelatin possess high potential for commercial application as smart food packaging through their associated and unique characteristics.

2.4. Biodegradation of Gelatin-Based Film

Gelatin is traditionally derived from by-products of livestock with high reproductive rates, mainly from cattle (cattle source) and pigs (pig source). Compared to petroleum-based synthetic alternatives, its production offers notable environmental advantages, including a reduced carbon footprint due to lower CO2 emissions [61]. At the same time, gelatin can be degraded into amino acids by enzymes after fulfilling its function without generating environmentally harmful byproducts. Increasing environmental awareness in recent decades has stimulated the advancement of new gelatin-based biodegradable films derived from renewable resources. As an eco-friendly alternative, gelatin-based films significantly reduce the environmental footprint associated with conventional non-biodegradable plastic waste [62]. Consequently, gelatin-based film is ideally suited for the development of simple, portable, and rapid pH sensors, owing to its satisfactory biocompatibility, biodegradability, biosafety, affordability, and facilitation of easy handling and usage [63].

3. Development of Gelatin-Based pH Sensors

Gelatin-based pH sensors are composed of two primary components, an intelligent indicator and an active carrier [52], as illustrated in Figure 1. These sensors are capable of monitoring environmental changes within the packaging in real-time, thereby providing visual information regarding food quality. Using visible indicators, they enable consumers to track and rapidly assess food quality, offering a reliable and non-invasive method for ensuring the freshness and safety of packaged foods.

3.1. Active Carriers

The active carrier in pH sensors must provide a sensitive, safe, and stable environment for the intelligent indicator. Gelatin, a low-cost and widely available Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) food additive, serves as an ideal carrier for various bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides, nanoparticles, and polyphenols, owing to its excellent oxygen barrier and film-forming. Biodegradable gelatin carriers not only protect packaged food from oxidation, thereby extending shelf life, but also help maintain an appropriate relative humidity within the packaging environment [64]. However, pure gelatin carriers have several limitations, including weak mechanical properties, high hydrophilicity, poor thermal stability, and limited applicability [65]. Studies indicate that the tensile strength of mammalian gelatin-based films ranges from 2.40 to 63.25 MPa [66,67,68]. When in contact with high-moisture foods, pure gelatin films exhibit poor water resistance due to their high moisture absorption. Additionally, gelatin lacks inherent biological activity, making pure gelatin films susceptible to degradation by microorganisms, UV radiation, and oxidative substances, which can compromise food quality. As a result, the use of unmodified gelatin films in practical applications is not recommended.
Cross-linking modification which encompassing physical crosslinking, chemical crosslinking, and enzymatic crosslinking has proven to be the most effective approach for enhancing the properties of gelatin-based films. Reactive modifications of the active groups (-COOH, -NH2, -OH) on the gelatin molecules can impart the desired stability to gelatin-based films. In the context of food storage and transport, an ideal modification method should allow for user control over both preservation and degradation times according to specific needs. Nevertheless, most currently employed crosslinking methods for gelatin are irreversible [69].
It is crucial that gelatin-based pH sensors not only ensure the safety of packaged food, but also provide adequate stability to the gelatin carrier. Consequently, the modification for gelatin-based carriers must be safe, efficient, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly. In recent years, the incorporation of functional fillers into gelatin matrices to develop multifunctional active films has emerged as a significant research focus [15,64]. As is shown in Figure 2, functional fillers are critical for the preparing multifunctional gelatin-based pH sensors, as the synergy between functional fillers and gelatin can enhance the composite materials with desired properties. Natural biopolymers, including polysaccharides, nanofillers, essential oils, and tannins, along with biodegradable synthetic polymers, can be integrated into the gelatin matrix to produce smart packaging [70]. The incorporation of active components, including antimicrobial agents, antioxidants, and UV shielding agents, improves the functionality of the films, thereby extending food shelf life, enhancing sensory attributes, and increasing the safety of packaged foods [71,72,73,74].

3.1.1. Natural Polysaccharides

Natural polysaccharides, such as cellulose, starch, chitosan, sodium alginate, carrageenan, and agar, are abundant, renewable, and cost-effective, making them widely utilized in the food industry [75,76,77,78,79]. These polysaccharides can be categorized as cationic polysaccharides or anionic polysaccharides. The incorporation of natural polysaccharides into gelatin for composite modification addresses the issue of poor mechanical properties in gelatin films, thereby enhancing film-forming, biocompatibility, and controllable biodegradability [80,81]. Gelatin-based packaging that integrates natural polysaccharides can prevent the loss of nutrients, flavor, and moisture from packaged food, thus improving the safety of packaged food.
Chitosan is a natural cationic polysaccharide. For example, a radical grafting method was employed to incorporate gallic acid into chitosan. The modified chitosan was subsequently combined with gelatin using hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions, resulting in the formation of a stable polyelectrolyte complex and producing a gelatin/chitosan pH-sensitive film [82]. The findings indicate a significant improvement in the water solubility of gallic acid-modified chitosan. This polyelectrolyte complex enhances the encapsulation efficiency of active substances and the stability of natural dyes, making the newly developed dual-functional gelatin-based composite film suitable for preserving food and monitoring food quality. Among natural polysaccharides, starch is particularly well-suited for the preparation of smart packaging. Starch consists of amylose and amylopectin. The ratio of amylopectin significantly influences the mechanical properties of the composite films [79]. Currently, research on gelatin for liquid food smart packaging is limited due to its strong hydrophilicity. A portable sensor capable of accurately measuring milk quality parameters was developed [83], including freshness and potential adulteration. This sensor utilizes a gelatin/starch composite film as a carrier for color-changing polymers, producing films sensitive to hydrogen peroxide, hexavalent chromium, salicylic acid, and pH. These color-changing films were integrated with QR code technology to create a milk testing card that visually reflects milk quality based on color changes. The results demonstrate that the sensor can simultaneously detect three different preservatives (H2O2, salicylic acid, and Cr(VI)) while monitoring milk freshness. Each sample point on the smart film exhibits color changes directly related to the concentration of the target analyte, enabling users to obtain detailed monitoring data by scanning the QR code. This sensor is low-cost, environmentally friendly, and responsive, offering promising applications in the field of milk quality control.

3.1.2. Nanofillers

Nanofillers provide several advantages, including high specific surface area, flexibility, biocompatibility, ease of modification, and antimicrobial properties. They are widely employed to enhance the mechanical properties, thermal performance, and water vapor barrier capabilities of composite films [84,85,86,87]. The incorporation of nanoparticles into gelatin matrices not only addresses challenges such as poor mechanical performance, brittleness, and processing difficulties associated with gelatin films, but also ensures the safety and quality of food during storage and transportation.
The addition of inorganic nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) [88], silicon dioxide (SiO2) [89,90], copper sulfide (CuS) [91], zinc oxide (ZnO) [92], and carbon dots (CDs) [62,93] can significantly enhance the mechanical properties of gelatin films while also endowing them with excellent antibacterial properties, water vapor barrier capabilities, and thermal stability. For instance, Zinc oxide nanoparticles and mulberry extract were incorporated into a gelatin/chitosan matrix through hydrogen bonding to develop a novel pH-sensitive film for real-time monitoring of pork freshness [94]. The inclusion of zinc oxide nanoparticles markedly improved the water vapor barrier of the gelatin-based film. Black rice bran anthocyanins were incorporated into a matrix composed of gelatin and chitin nanocrystals to create a pH-sensitive film with antioxidant activity [95]. The chitin nanocrystals conferred excellent antibacterial properties and thermal stability to the gelatin film, enabling it to visually indicate the freshness of high-protein foods such as shrimp and ribbonfish through color changes. Notably, the film with a lower anthocyanin content demonstrated increased sensitivity to basic volatile compounds released during storage. In another study, copper-based metal–organic frameworks (Cu-MOFs) were integrated into a gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol blend film [96]. MOFs are unique porous nanomaterials formed by coordinating metal ions with organic ligand clusters. The addition of Cu-MOFs enhanced the tensile strength, water resistance, and UV shielding properties of the gelatin film, while also imparting antioxidant and antibacterial capabilities. During freshness monitoring, MOFs nanofillers with high surface areas can adsorb volatile organic amines, thereby enhancing the colorimetric response. The interaction between nanoparticles and gelatin bestows gelatin-based films with excellent antibacterial properties, indicating significant potential for the development of smart packaging [97]. However, the incorporation of nanoparticles considerably increases the cost of gelatin-based films, presenting a challenge that must be addressed.

3.1.3. Essential Oils

Essential oils are natural plant extracts characterized by volatility, containing various active compounds with antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-allergic, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, these oils are highly sensitive to heat, light, and oxygen [65,98]. Their volatility, hydrophobicity, irritancy, and instability limit their direct application in food packaging. To preserve their structure and activity, essential oils typically require encapsulation. Essential oils can be encapsulated in gelatin matrix. Gelatin not only provides a controlled and safe delivery environment, but also improves the bioavailability and stability of essential oils. Meanwhile, the hydrophobicity of the gelatin-based film is enhanced. This encapsulation imparts additional antibacterial, antioxidant, and functional properties to the film [99].
In recent years, gelatin films modified with plant essential oils have been increasingly utilized in the development of pH sensors due to their eco-friendly, biodegradable, non-toxic, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties [100]. Pickering emulsion composed of alizarin and oregano essential oil (OEO) was introduced into gelatin films, resulting in a novel multifunctional food packaging [101]. The incorporation of OEO enhanced the UV resistance and mechanical properties of the film. The controlled release effects of the Pickering emulsion significantly improved the film’s antioxidant and antibacterial capabilities. The film exhibited a distinct color change from yellow to purple as the pH increased within the range of pH 3–11 and demonstrated sensitivity to ammonia vapor within four minutes. This innovative gelatin-based film slowed the spoilage of beef and provided real-time freshness monitoring through color changes.
However, the direct addition of essential oils to the gelatin film-forming solution can lead to phase separation, which typically increases film unevenness and surface roughness, thereby reducing transparency. Consequently, during the preparation of the gelatin/essential oils composite film-forming solution, it is essential to emulsify the oil phase prior to casting the film. Compared to pure gelatin films, gelatin composite films containing natural essential oils exhibit a significant reduction in light transmittance due to the migration of oil droplets to the film’s surface during the drying process.

3.1.4. Tannins

Tannins (TAs) are natural polyphenolic compounds widely distributed in plants [102]. Under oxidative conditions, TAs react with the amino groups of peptide side chains, leading to crosslinking within gelatin molecules. Due to the high content of proline in gelatin, TAs exhibit a strong affinity for gelatin. Tannin-crosslinked gelatin films demonstrate excellent mechanical strength and stability. TAs have long been utilized as natural crosslinking agents in the food industry [103,104,105,106,107]. TA was incorporated into gelatin-silver nanocomposite films, significantly improving the films’ water vapor barrier [64]. The presence of TAs also increased the mechanical strength and thermal stability of the films, contributing to the maintenance or extension of the shelf life of packaged foods. Grape seed TA (Seed T) and grape skin TA (Skin T) can enhance the properties of gelatin films for smart packaging [108]. The addition of these two types of TA resulted in gelatin films with low wettability and high UV shielding capability. Furthermore, the introduction of TAs significantly enhanced the antioxidant properties of the gelatin films. Notably, gelatin films containing grape skin TA (Skin T) exhibited pH-sensitivity.

3.1.5. Synthetic Degradable Materials

Many bioplastics incorporate synthetic degradable polymeric materials that enhance product functionality and broaden applications. Similarly, the incorporation of renewable materials into gelatin can address the strong hydrophilicity and poor mechanical properties of gelatin films, leading to the development of biodegradable smart packaging.
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a non-toxic polymer known for its excellent chemical stability and biocompatibility. The abundance of hydroxyl groups in its structure facilitates the formation of hydrogen bonds during the film-forming process, resulting in good film-forming [109]. Consequently, PVA is widely utilized in fields such as biomedicine [110,111,112,113], food packaging [114,115,116,117,118], and the coatings industry [119,120,121,122]. As a bioindicator, amaranth leaf extract (ALE) was introduced a combination of PVA and gelatin to prepare an active film [123]. The reduction in both water solubility and water vapor permeability of the film, while significantly enhancing its mechanical properties, thereby rendering it suitable as a smart packaging material for meat. Redox polymerization technology was employed to incorporate N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAAm) and pomegranate extract into gelatin, resulting in a biocompatible gelatin-based smart hydrogel [124]. The findings demonstrate that DMAAm enhanced both the mechanical properties and water resistance of the hydrogel, which also exhibited excellent thermal stability, antibacterial activity, and pH sensitivity, making it a promising candidate for smart food packaging.
Blending gelatin with synthetic degradable materials can significantly improve the mechanical properties, water resistance, and stability of gelatin-based films. Unlike conventional packaging, which primarily provides sealing and preservation functions, these multifunctional films offer comprehensive protection against microorganisms, oxygen, and ultraviolet light, thus extending the shelf life of food. However, the potential toxicity of these gelatin-based composite materials remains a topic of ongoing debate. The challenge ahead lies in the selection of nontoxic synthetic degradable materials to achieve effective multifunctional modifications of gelatin-based products.

3.2. Intelligent Indicators

The primary function of the intelligent indicators is to detect and communicate critical information regarding product freshness, safety, and storage conditions. It responds to environmental changes within the packaging and provides real-time, non-invasive, visual information on food quality through colorimetric responses during storage and transportation [125]. The pH-sensitive indicators typically incorporates one or more pH-sensitive dyes that detect specific compounds and environmental changes within the packaging. These dyes convey information on food freshness or microbial quality to consumers by means of visible color changes [126,127]. As illustrated in Figure 3, pH-sensitive dyes are categorized into two types, synthetic pH-sensitive dyes and natural pH-sensitive dyes. The careful selection of an appropriate pH-sensitive dye is crucial for the effective development of gelatin-based pH sensors.

3.2.1. Synthetic Dyes

Synthetic pH-sensitive dyes were the first to be utilized for color indication in pH sensors. Acid–base indicators, such as bromocresol purple [128], bromophenol blue [129], bromocresol green [130], chlorophenol red [131,132], cresol red [133,134], and bromocresol green [135], have been used in food packaging to provide real-time information on food quality [52,136]. Three synthetic indicators (methyl orange (MO), neutral red (NR), and bromocresol green (BCG)) were incorporated into a gelatin matrix to develop color-changing gelatin films that communicate food quality through visual color variation [40]. The resulting gelatin films demonstrated pH responsiveness, displaying different colors when exposed to media of varying pH levels (liquid, semi-solid, or gas). Moreover, the inclusion of MO and NR enhanced the mechanical properties of the gelatin films while simultaneously reducing their water solubility.
However, concerns regarding food safety have raised significant issues about the use of synthetic pH-sensitive dyes. These dyes are potentially toxic and pose both health and environmental risks, which has led to controversy over their application in pH sensors. Consequently, their practical application has been limited, and they are increasingly being replaced by natural pH-sensitive dyes [137].

3.2.2. Natural Dyes

Natural pH-sensitive dyes are increasingly favored over synthetic alternatives to meet growing market demands for safer and more eco-friendly packaging. These natural dyes are abundant, easily accessible, and widely distributed in various colorful fruits, vegetables, and other plants [138]. Dyes such as anthocyanins [139], carotenoids [140], betalains [141], curcumin [142], and chlorophyll [143] have been extensively studied for incorporation into pH sensors. The structures of these natural dyes typically contain multiple conjugated phenolic rings. When environmental pH changes occur, the phenolic hydroxyl groups undergo protonation or deprotonation, altering the molecular coupling patterns and resulting in visible color changes [144].
Natural dyes offer numerous advantages, including safety, a broad signal range, and strong pH responsiveness. Studies have demonstrated that natural dyes not only effectively indicate changes in food quality, but also possess antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, which can help extend the shelf life of foods [145,146,147]. By utilizing gelatin as a substrate and incorporating various natural dyes into the gelatin matrix, it is possible to develop multifunctional gelatin-based pH sensors that combine smart sensing capabilities with antimicrobial and antioxidant functionalities.
Compared to synthetic dyes, natural dyes present several advantages, including non-toxicity, renewability, and environmental compatibility. However, it is essential to recognize that crude plant extracts often contain other polyphenolic compounds, which may interfere with the colorimetric responses of natural dyes. As a result, crude plant extracts cannot be directly utilized in the preparation of gelatin-based pH sensors and must undergo purification prior to use [138]. Furthermore, the color range, sensitivity, permeability, and stability of natural dyes as food indicators within the gelatin matrix still require further optimization [137].

4. Summary and Outlook

Novel gelatin-based pH sensors are poised to shape the future of food packaging. In recent years, gelatin-based pH sensors have gained significant traction in the field of active smart packaging due to their unique advantages, including sensitivity, safety, rapid response, and non-invasiveness [15]. To be widely adopted, these materials must be cost-effective, sensitive, easy to prepare, and capable of real-time monitoring of food quality using visible color changes [148]. Table 2 provides a comprehensive summary of recent advancements in food freshness monitoring utilizing gelatin-based pH sensors, highlighting their performance characteristics and application potential. Future research should focus on the following key areas.
(1) Enhancing the reproducibility of gelatin-based pH sensors. When interfacing with high-moisture food surfaces, gelatin films demonstrate significant moisture absorption properties, leading to substantial water uptake. This pronounced hygroscopic behavior induces the rapid swelling of the film matrix, resulting in considerable alterations to both its structural integrity and functional properties. Despite the widespread application of gelatin in pH sensors development, the major challenge with gelatin films is their elevated water solubility and moisture sensitivity together with their weak mechanical strength and poor stability [150]. The weak mechanical properties and poor stability of gelatin film limit its applications in food packaging. Additionally, gelatin sourced from various origins exhibits differing molecular structures and functional characteristics, which may lead to inconsistent reproducibility in gelatin-based pH sensors. At present, key issues include achieving rapid and safe functional modifications while simultaneously enhancing the stability of gelatin film, particularly its thermal stability and mechanical stability. Optimizing these characteristics is essential for producing gelatin-based pH sensors with extended operational lifetimes, improved sensitivity, and reliable field performance. Therefore, safe and efficient functional modifications are necessary to meet specific application requirements. Detailed studies on design parameters and component miscibility during the modification process are critical. Exploring efficient, low-cost, and environmentally friendly modification methods will be essential to improve the performance and applicability of gelatin-based pH sensors. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for achieving the long life, high sensitivity, and in-field application of gelatin-based pH sensors.
(2) Improving the stability of natural dyes. Maintaining the stability of natural dyes embedded in multifunctional gelatin-based films is challenging due to interactions between the gelatin matrix and active compounds. These dyes are highly sensitive to environmental factors such as light, temperature, and pH, which can compromise the visual appearance and accuracy of gelatin-based pH sensors [151]. Future research should prioritize enhancing the stability of natural dyes under various storage and transportation conditions. Additionally, structural design innovations in gelatin-based smart materials could the controllable release kinetics of active substances, ensuring sustained functionality throughout the entire shelf life of food.
(3) Optimizing the pH sensitivity and compatibility of the pH sensors. Gelatin-based pH sensors can provide qualitative or semi-quantitative information about food quality changes while preserving the integrity of the packaging, allowing consumers to visually assess freshness. However, gelatin’s composition includes various α-amino acids with ionizable side groups that may act as a buffering system, potentially affecting the films’ responsiveness to pH changes. Furthermore, these side groups can exhibit high reactivity towards crosslinking or grafting, which may impact the sensitivity of the gelatin-based pH sensors [40]. As a result, these systems are not universally applicable. Their compatibility with the specific food being monitored must be confirmed. Optimal functionality is achieved only when the gelatin-based pH sensors is tailored to the appropriate type of food. Additionally, while these systems monitor a single parameter (pH), they cannot provide comprehensive insights into overall food quality. Monitoring processes may also face errors or malfunctions, and variations in storage and transportation conditions could further compromise sensitivity and stability. Therefore, further in-depth studies on the structural stability of gelatin-based pH sensors under diverse environmental conditions are essential to ensure consumer health and safety.
(4) Achieving commercial applications of the Gelatin-based pH sensors. Gelatin-based pH sensors offer significant advantages for food packaging applications as cost-effective, power-free quality indicators that provide visual readouts interpretable by consumers without technical training. Despite these benefits, the development of gelatin-based pH sensors remains at an early stage with substantial untapped potential [152]. While their production requires minimal specialized equipment and reduced material inputs compared to conventional sensors, current formulations still face inadequate long-term stability and the susceptibility of colorimetric indicators to environmental degradation. These constraints render the conventional casting approach unsuitable for commercial-scale manufacturing. Although considerable research efforts have been directed toward developing novel gelatin-based pH sensors with enhanced environmental stability and reduced sensitivity to external factors, the majority of current research remains confined to laboratory-scale investigations, with limited translation to commercial applications. These challenges represent a critical research gap that requires urgent attention in future. Bridging this gap will require concerted efforts to optimize manufacturing processes while maintaining the functional integrity and cost-effectiveness of gelatin-based sensors.
By addressing these challenges, gelatin-based pH sensors can achieve broader applicability and reliability, paving the way for their widespread adoption in the food industry.

Funding

This research was funded by [The Nurture Foundation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Project of Qinghai] [Thousand Talents Program 2020].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fung, F.; Wang, H.S.; Menon, S. Food safety in the 21st century. Biomed. J. 2018, 41, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Halonen, N.; Pálvölgyi, P.S.; Bassani, A.; Fiorentini, C.; Nair, R.; Spigno, G.; Kordas, K. Bio-based smart materials for food packaging and sensors—A review. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. King, T.; Cole, M.; Farber, J.M.; Eisenbrand, G.; Zabaras, D.; Fox, E.M.; Hill, J.P. Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gallo, M.; Ferrara, L.; Calogero, A.; Montesano, D.; Naviglio, D. Relationships between food and diseases: What to know to ensure food safety. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, X.; Zhao, J.; Li, M.; Zhao, X.; Wei, X.; Luo, Z.; Gu, W.; Du, D.; Lin, Y.; Zhu, C. Single-atom materials for food safety. Mater. Today 2023, 64, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sani, M.A.; Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Tavassoli, M.; Mohammadi, K.; McClements, D.J. Recent advances in the development of smart and active biodegradable packaging materials. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amjadi, S.; Gholizadeh, S.; Hamishehkar, H.; Moghaddam, T.N.; Haghi, P.B.; Bakhshizadeh, M. Development of an intelligent packaging system based on gelatin/chitosan nanofibers and containing β-Cyclodextrin/Viola odorata L. anthocyanins complex. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jebel, F.S.; Roufegarinejad, L.; Alizadeh, A.; Amjadi, S. Development and characterization of a double-layer smart packaging system consisting of polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibers and gelatin film for fish fillet. Food Chem. 2025, 462, 140985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, J.; Peng, Q.; Wang, J.; Deng, J.; Li, W.; Lin, Q.; Zhong, F.; Xia, X. An intelligent thymol/alizarin-loaded polycaprolactone/gelatin/zein nanofibrous film with pH-responsive and antibacterial properties for shrimp freshness monitoring and preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 471, 142812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alpaslan, D. Use of colorimetric hydrogel as an indicator for food packaging applications. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2019, 42, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sani, M.A.; Maleki, M.; Eghbaljoo-Gharehgheshlaghi, H.; Khezerlou, A.; Mohammadian, E.; Liu, Q.; Jafari, S.M. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles as multifunctional surface-active materials for smart/active nanocomposite packaging films. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 300, 102593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferri, M.; Papchenko, K.; Degli Esposti, M.; Tondi, G.; De Angelis, M.G.; Morselli, D.; Fabbri, P. Fully biobased polyhydroxyalkanoate/tannin films as multifunctional materials for smart food packaging applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 28594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Tavassoli, M.; McClements, D.J.; Hamishehkar, H. Multifunctional halochromic packaging materials: Saffron petal anthocyanin loaded-chitosan nanofiber/methyl cellulose matrices. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 111, 106237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tavassoli, M.; Sani, M.A.; Khezerlou, A.; Ehsani, A.; McClements, D.J. Multifunctional nanocomposite active packaging materials: Immobilization of quercetin, lactoferrin, and chitosan nanofiber particles in gelatin films. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Balbinot-Alfaro, E.; Craveiro, D.V.; Lima, K.O.; Costa, H.L.G.; Lopes, D.R.; Prentice, C. Intelligent packaging with pH indicator potential. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yousefi, H.; Su, H.M.; Imani, S.M.; Alkhaldi, K.M.; Filipe, C.D.; Didar, T.F. Intelligent food packaging: A review of smart sensing technologies for monitoring food quality. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miao, Z.; Yang, M.; Abdalkarim, S.Y.H.; Yu, H.Y. In situ growth of curcumin-loaded cellulose composite film for real-time monitoring of food freshness in smart packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Echegaray, N.; Guzel, N.; Kumar, M.; Guzel, M.; Hassoun, A.; Lorenzo, J.M. Recent advancements in natural colorants and their application as coloring in food and in intelligent food packaging. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoshida, C.M.; Maciel, V.B.V.; Mendonça, M.E.D.; Franco, T.T. Chitosan biobased and intelligent films: Monitoring pH variations. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 55, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Xue, C.; Ji, D.; Wen, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Sustainably sourced, water-soluble biofilms based on keratin constructed through two crosslinking modes: Turning waste into useful materials. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zheng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jing, Y.; Li, J.; Zhan, H. An acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on ionic liquid functionalized graphene–gelatin-modified electrode for sensitive detection of pesticides. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 210, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, W.; Li, M.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Wu, X. A Review of Modified Gelatin: Physicochemical Properties, Modification Methods, and Applications in the Food Field. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 20705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gaidau, C.; Râpă, M.; Ionita, G.; Stanculescu, I.R.; Zaharescu, T.; Constantinescu, R.R.; Lazea-Stoyanova, A.; Stanca, M. The Influence of Gamma Radiation on Different Gelatin Nanofibers and Gelatins. Gels 2024, 10, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, Q.; Hossen, M.A.; Zeng, Y.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Gelatin-based composite films and their application in food packaging: A review. J. Food Eng. 2022, 313, 110762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nitsuwat, S.; Zhang, P.; Ng, K.; Fang, Z. Fish gelatin as an alternative to mammalian gelatin for food industry: A meta-analysis. LWT 2021, 141, 110899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tan, Y.; Zi, Y.; Peng, J.; Shi, C.; Zheng, Y.; Zhong, J. Gelatin as a bioactive nanodelivery system for functional food applications. Food Chem. 2023, 423, 136265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Graziola, F.; Candido, T.M.; Oliveira, C.A.D.; Peres, D.D.A.; Issa, M.G.; Mota, J.; Rosado, C.; Consiglieri, V.O.; Kaneko, T.M.; Velasco, M.V.R.; et al. Gelatin-based microspheres crosslinked with glutaraldehyde and rutin oriented to cosmetics. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 52, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buscaglia, M.; Guérard, F.; Roquefort, P.; Aubry, T.; Fauchon, M.; Toueix, Y.; Fauchon, M.; Toueix, Y.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V.; Hellio, C.; et al. Mechanically enhanced salmo salar gelatin by enzymatic cross-linking: Premise of a bioinspired material for food packaging, cosmetics, and biomedical applications. Mar. Biotechnol. 2022, 24, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, W.; Gong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wu, D. Design of gum Arabic/gelatin composite microcapsules and their cosmetic applications in encapsulating tea tree essential oil. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 4880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Nimry, S.; Dayah, A.A.; Hasan, I.; Daghmash, R. Cosmetic, biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of fish gelatin/hydrolysates. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qu, W.; Qader, I.B.; Abbott, A.P. Controlled release of pharmaceutical agents using eutectic modified gelatin. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tukiran, N.A.; Anuar, N.A.A.; Jamaludin, M.A. Gelatin in halal pharmaceutical products. Malays. J. Syariah Law 2023, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dille, M.J.; Hattrem, M.N.; Draget, K.I. Soft, chewable gelatin-based pharmaceutical oral formulations: A technical approach. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Girdhar, V.; Patil, S.; Dubey, S.K.; Singhvi, G. Pharmaceutical applications of gelatin. In Natural Polymers for Pharmaceutical Applications; Apple Academic Press: Florida, NJ, USA, 2019; p. 93. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lv, L.C.; Huang, Q.Y.; Ding, W.; Xiao, X.H.; Zhang, H.Y.; Xiong, L.X. Fish gelatin: The novel potential applications. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 63, 103581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rashid, A.B.; Showva, N.N.; Hoque, M.E. Gelatin-based scaffolds: An intuitive support structure for regenerative therapy. Current Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 26, 100452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mushtaq, F.; Raza, Z.A.; Batool, S.R.; Zahid, M.; Onder, O.C.; Rafique, A.; Nazeer, M.A. Preparation, properties, and applications of gelatin-based hydrogels (GHs) in the environmental, technological, and biomedical sectors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 218, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohanto, S.; Narayana, S.; Merai, K.P.; Kumar, J.A.; Bhunia, A.; Hani, U.; Fatease, A.A.; Gowda, B.H.J.; Nag, S.; Ahmed, M.G.; et al. Advancements in gelatin-based hydrogel systems for biomedical applications: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Seedi, H.R.; Said, N.S.; Yosri, N.; Hawash, H.B.; El-Sherif, D.M.; Abouzid, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Yaseen, M.; Omarl, H.; Shou, Q.; et al. Gelatin nanofibers: Recent insights in synthesis, bio-medical applications and limitations. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Musso, Y.S.; Salgado, P.R.; Mauri, A.N. Gelatin based films capable of modifying its color against environmental pH changes. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 61, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duconseille, A.; Astruc, T.; Quintana, N.; Meersman, F.; Sante-Lhoutellier, V. Gelatin structure and composition linked to hard capsule dissolution: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, Z.Z.; Sha, X.M.; Huang, T.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.Y.; Tu, Z.C. Microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) modified fish gelatin-γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA): Rheological behavior, gelling properties, and structure. Food Chem. 2021, 348, 129093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abedinia, A.; Nafchi, A.M.; Sharifi, M.; Ghalambor, P.; Oladzadabbasabadi, N.; Ariffin, F.; Huda, N. Poultry gelatin: Characteristics, developments, challenges, and future outlooks as a sustainable alternative for mammalian gelatin. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 104, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hou, P.Z.; Regenstein, J.M. Optimization of extraction conditions for pollock skin gelatin. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Songchotikunpan, P.; Tattiyakul, J.; Supaphol, P. Extraction and electrospinning of gelatin from fish skin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008, 42, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, T.K.; Ham, Y.K.; Shin, D.M.; Kim, H.W.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, Y.B.; Choi, Y.S. Extraction of crude gelatin from duck skin: Effects of heating methods on gelatin yield. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Almeida, P.F.; Lannes, S.C.D.S. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of gelatin from chicken by-product. J. Food Process Eng. 2013, 36, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarbon, N.M.; Badii, F.; Howell, N.K. Preparation and characterisation of chicken skin gelatin as an alternative to mammalian gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Foox, M.; Zilberman, M. Drug delivery from gelatin-based systems. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, T.; Tu, Z.C.; Shangguan, X.; Sha, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Bansal, N. Fish gelatin modifications: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abedinia, A.; Ariffin, F.; Huda, N.; Nafchi, A.M. Preparation and characterization of a novel biocomposite based on duck feet gelatin as alternative to bovine gelatin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yao, Q.B.; Huang, F.; Lu, Y.H.; Huang, J.M.; Ali, M.; Jia, X.Z.; Zeng, X.; Huang, Y.Y. Polysaccharide-based food packaging and intelligent packaging applications: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 147, 104390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Takei, T.; Yoshihara, R.; Danjo, S.; Fukuhara, Y.; Evans, C.; Tomimatsu, R.; Ohzuno, Y.; Yoshida, M. Hydrophobically-modified gelatin hydrogel as a carrier for charged hydrophilic drugs and hydrophobic drugs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aramwit, P.; Jaichawa, N.; Ratanavaraporn, J.; Srichana, T. A comparative study of type A and type B gelatin nanoparticles as the controlled release carriers for different model compounds. Mater. Express 2015, 5, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pulidori, E.; Micalizzi, S.; Koutsomarkos, N.; Bramanti, E.; Tinè, M.R.; Vozzi, G.; De Maria, C.; Chatzinikolaidou, M.; Duce, C. Analysis of gelatin secondary structure in gelatin/keratin-based biomaterials. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1279, 134984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alipal, J.; Pu’Ad, N.M.; Lee, T.C.; Nayan, N.H.M.; Sahari, N.; Basri, H.; Idris, M.; Abdullah, H.Z. A review of gelatin: Properties, sources, process, applications, and commercialisation. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Saber, M.M. Strategies for surface modification of gelatin-based nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 183, 110407. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mikhailov, O.V. Gelatin as it is: History and modernity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, J.; Sun, X.; Kang, Q.; Zhu, L.; Qin, G.; Chen, Q. Freezing-tolerant and robust gelatin-based supramolecular conductive hydrogels with double-network structure for wearable sensors. Polym. Test. 2021, 93, 106879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sarwar, T.; Raza, Z.A.; Nazeer, M.A.; Khan, A. Synthesis of aminolyzed gelatin-mediated chitosan as pH-responsive drug-carrying porous scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suderman, N.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. The effect of plasticizers on the functional properties of biodegradable gelatin-based film: A review. Food Biosci. 2018, 24, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Althawab, S.A.; Alsulami, T.; Alzahrani, H.; Alzahrani, A. Doped carbon dots reinforced flexible nanocomposite active polymer film for antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 698, 134554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guan, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, T. Applications of gelatin in biosensors: Recent trends and progress. Biosensors 2022, 12, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Menezes, M.D.L.L.R.; da Rocha Pires, N.; da Cunha, P.L.R.; de Freitas Rosa, M.; de Souza, B.W.S.; de Andrade Feitosa, J.P.; de Souza, M.D.S.M. Effect of tannic acid as crosslinking agent on fish skin gelatin-silver nanocomposite film. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bakhshizadeh, M.; Ayaseh, A.; Hamishehkar, H.; Kafil, H.S.; Moghaddam, T.N.; Haghi, P.B.; Tavassoli, M.; Amjadi, S.; Lorenzo, J.M. Multifunctional performance of packaging system based on gelatin/alove vera gel film containing of rosemary essential oil and common poppy anthocyanins. Food Control 2023, 154, 110017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Said, N.S.; Sarbon, N.M. Physical and mechanical characteristics of gelatin-based films as a potential food packaging material: A review. Membranes 2022, 12, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Said, N.S.; Howell, N.K.; Sarbon, N.M. A review on potential use of gelatin-based film as active and smart biodegradable films for food packaging application. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rather, J.A.; Akhter, N.; Ashraf, Q.S.; Mir, S.A.; Makroo, H.A.; Majid, D.; Barba, F.J.; Khaneghah, A.M.; Dar, B.N. A comprehensive review on gelatin: Understanding impact of the sources, extraction methods, and modifications on potential packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, S.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Cao, Y.; Ning, X.; Sun, J.; Chen, Q.; Ling, M. Reversible cross-linking of gelatin by a disulphide-containing bis-succinimide for tunable degradation and release. Food Chem. 2023, 18, 100699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gomes, B.T.; Borges, L.L.R.; de Leon, N.M.E.P.; Arruda, T.R.; Ribeiro, A.R.C.; Marques, C.S.; Stringheta, P.C.; de Oliveira, T.V.; Soares, N.D.F.F. Gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol films incorporated with different blueberry extracts as potential colorimetric indicators to detect acidic and basic vapors. Food Control 2024, 165, 110648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rahman, S.; Gogoi, J.; Dubey, S.; Chowdhury, D. Animal derived biopolymers for food packaging applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 255, 128197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chaari, M.; Elhadef, K.; Akermi, S.; Ben Akacha, B.; Fourati, M.; Chakchouk Mtibaa, A.; Ennouri, M.; Sarkar, T.; Shariati, M.A.; Rebezov, M.; et al. Novel active food packaging films based on gelatin-sodium alginate containing beetroot peel extract. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Musso, Y.S.; Salgado, P.R.; Maur, A.N. Smart gelatin films prepared using red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) extracts as solvent. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ibeogu, I.H.; Bako, H.K.; Yar, M.S.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, M.; Ke, W.; Shan, K.; Zhou, G.; et al. Gelatin-serum plasma film incorporated with curcumin for improvement of antioxidant and antibacterial properties for fresh pork packaging application. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yong, H.; Liu, J. Polysaccharide-catechin conjugates: Synthesis methods, structural characteristics, physicochemical properties, bioactivities and potential applications in food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 145, 104353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.W. Preparation of gelatin/carrageenan-based color-indicator film integrated with shikonin and propolis for smart food packaging applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 4, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jancikova, S.; Jamróz, E.; Kulawik, P.; Tkaczewska, J.; Dordevic, D. Furcellaran/gelatin hydrolysate/rosemary extract composite films as active and intelligent packaging materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sadi, A.; Ferfera-Harrar, H. Cross-linked CMC/Gelatin bio-nanocomposite films with organoclay, red cabbage anthocyanins and pistacia leaves extract as active intelligent food packaging: Colorimetric pH indication, antimicrobial/antioxidant properties, and shrimp spoilage tests. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zong, Z.; Liu, M.; Chen, H.; Farag, M.A.; Wu, W.; Fang, X.; Niu, B.; Gao, H. Preparation and characterization of a novel intelligent starch/gelatin binary film containing purple sweet potato anthocyanins for Flammulina velutipes mushroom freshness monitoring. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhai, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Zou, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.; Holmes, M.; et al. Natural biomaterial-based edible and pH-sensitive films combined with electrochemical writing for intelligent food packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Akhtar, H.M.S.; Ahmed, S.; Olewnik-Kruszkowska, E.; Gierszewska, M.; Brzezinska, M.S.; Dembińska, K.; Kalwasińska, A. Carboxymethyl cellulose based films enriched with polysaccharides from mulberry leaves (Morus alba L.) as new biodegradable packaging material. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, L.; Zhao, Z.; Wei, S.; Xu, K.; Xia, J.; Wu, Q.; Lü, X.; Wang, L. Development and application of multifunctional films based on modified chitosan/gelatin polyelectrolyte complex for preservation and monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 147, 109336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fotouhi, M.; Nasihatkon, B.; Solouki, S.; Seidi, S. A card instead of a lab: A ligand embedded in a bio-composite of starch/gelatin intelligent film for milk quality test followed by colorimetric analysis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 228, 426. [Google Scholar]
  84. Duan, Q.; Chen, Y.; Yu, L.; Xie, F. Chitosan-gelatin films: Plasticizers/nanofillers affect chain interactions and material properties in different ways. Polymers 2022, 14, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kwak, H.W.; Lee, H.; Park, S.; Lee, M.E.; Jin, H.J. Chemical and physical reinforcement of hydrophilic gelatin film with di-aldehyde nanocellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, N.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Lin, D. Bacterial cellulose nanofibers used as nanofillers improved the fresh-keeping performance of gelatin-based edible coating for fresh-cut apples. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shankar, S.; Jaiswal, L.; Rhim, J.W. Gelatin-based nanocomposite films: Potential use in antimicrobial active packaging. In Antimicrobial Food Packaging; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; p. 339. [Google Scholar]
  88. Boughriba, S.; Souissi, N.; Jridi, M.; Li, S.; Nasri, M. Thermal, mechanical and microstructural characterization and antioxidant potential of Rhinobatos cemiculus gelatin films supplemented by titanium dioxide doped silver nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 103, 105695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Cao, S.; Shang, T.; Yan, H.; Lin, Q. Nano-SiO2 reinforced alginate-chitosan-gelatin nanocomposite hydrogels with improved physicochemical properties and biological activity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 228, 113413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sagar, S.; Khalid, U.; Azim, W.; Kanwal, M.; Hossain, N. Reinforcement of biodegradable SiO2NPs-modified cellulose-gelatin hydrogel films with antioxidant and antibacterial properties as potential food packaging composite. J. Clust. Sci. 2024, 35, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.W. Gelatin-based film integrated with copper sulfide nanoparticles for active packaging applications. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, H.J.; Roy, S.; Rhim, J.W. Gelatin/agar-based color-indicator film integrated with Clitoria ternatea flower anthocyanin and zinc oxide nanoparticles for monitoring freshness of shrimp. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Das, P.; Ganguly, S.; Ahmed, S.R.; Sherazee, M.; Margel, S.; Gedanken, A.; Srinivasan, S.; Rajabzadeh, A.R. Carbon dot biopolymer-based flexible functional films for antioxidant and food monitoring applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 9323. [Google Scholar]
  94. Zheng, T.; Tang, P.; Li, G. Development of a pH-sensitive film based on collagen/chitosan/ZnO nanoparticles and mulberry extract for pork freshness monitoring. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Bai, Y.; Yuan, C.; Wu, C.; Hu, Y. Intelligent gelatin/oxidized chitin nanocrystals nanocomposite films containing black rice bran anthocyanins for fish freshness monitorings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Rhim, J.W.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Gelatin/poly (vinyl alcohol)-based dual functional composite films integrated with metal-organic frameworks and anthocyanin for active and intelligent food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 249, 126040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rabee, M.; Elmogy, S.A.; Morsy, M.; Lawandy, S.; Zahran, M.A.H.; Moustafa, H. Biosynthesis of MgO nanoparticles and their impact on the properties of the PVA/gelatin nanocomposites for smart food packaging applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. e Silva, N.D.S.; de Souza Farias, F.; dos Santos Freitas, M.M.; Hernández, E.J.G.P.; Dantas, V.V.; Oliveira, M.E.C.; Joele, M.R.S.P.; Lourenço, L.D.F.H. Artificial intelligence application for classification and selection of fish gelatin packaging film produced with incorporation of palm oil and plant essential oils. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 27, 100611. [Google Scholar]
  99. Torabiardekani, N.; Karami, F.; Khorram, M.; Zare, A.; Kamkar, M.; Zomorodian, K.; Zareshahrabadi, Z. Encapsulation of Zataria multiflora essential oil in polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan/gelatin thermo-responsive hydrogel: Synthesis, physico-chemical properties, and biological investigations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 243, 125073. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang, J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Dong, M.; Li, L.; Zhangsun, H.; Wang, L. Dual-functional intelligent gelatin based packaging film for maintaining and monitoring the shrimp freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107258. [Google Scholar]
  101. Li, R.; Zhuang, D.; Feng, H.; Wang, S.; Zhu, J. Novel “all-in-one” multifunctional gelatin-based film for beef freshness maintaining and monitoring. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 136003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bule, M.; Khan, F.; Nisar, M.F.; Niaz, K.; Nabavi, S.; Saeedi, M.; Sanches Silva, A. Tannins (hydrolysable tannins, condensed tannins, phlorotannins, flavono-ellagitannins). In Recent Advances in Natural Products Analysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, NL, USA, 2020; p. 132. [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhang, W.; Roy, S.; Ezati, P.; Yang, D.P.; Rhim, J.W. Tannic acid: A green crosslinker for biopolymer-based food packaging films. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 136, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhen, M.; Wu, Y.; Ma, M.; Cheng, Y.; Jin, Y. Effect of catechin and tannins on the structural and functional properties of sodium alginate/gelatin/poly (vinylalcohol) blend films. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 135, 108141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kamari, A.; Phillip, E. Chitosan, gelatin and methylcellulose films incorporated with tannic acid for food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1119. [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhao, Y.; Tian, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sui, X. Enhancing the properties of soy protein isolate and dialdehyde starch films for food packaging applications through tannic acid crosslinking. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 332, 121903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, R.; Feng, H.; Wang, S.; Zhuang, D.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, J. A double-layer film based on the strategy of tannic acid-anthocyanin co-pigmentation and tannic-crosslinked-gelatin/− reduced Ag nanoparticles for beef preservation and monitoring. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Etxabide, A.; Yang, Y.; Maté, J.I.; de la Caba, K.; Kilmartin, P.A. Developing active and intelligent films through the incorporation of grape skin and seed tannin extracts into gelatin. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Khan, J.; An, H.; Alam, S.; Kalsoom, S.; Chen, S.H.; Begeno, T.A.; Du, Z. Smart colorimetric indicator films prepared from chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol with high mechanical strength and hydrophobic properties for monitoring shrimp freshness. Food Chem. 2024, 445, 138784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Qi, H.; Yang, L.; Ma, R.; Xiang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Ren, J.; Xu, B.B.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Thabet, H.K.; Huang, Z.; et al. Amoxicillin-laded sodium alginate/cellulose nanocrystals/polyvinyl alcohol composite nanonetwork sponges with enhanced wound healing and antibacterial performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Anwar, H.; Ahmad, M.; Minhas, M.U.; Rehmani, S. Alginate-polyvinyl alcohol based interpenetrating polymer network for prolonged drug therapy, optimization and in-vitro characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 166, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. He, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, N.; Liao, L. A novel approach in biomedical engineering: The use of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel encapsulating human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for enhanced osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 270, 132116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dorkhani, E.; Faryabi, A.; Noorafkan, Y.; Heirani, A.; Behboudi, B.; Fazeli, M.S.; Kazemeini, A.; Keramati, M.R.; Keshvari, A.; Tafti, S.M.A. Biomedical properties and hemostatic efficacy of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) based hydrogel in experimental rat liver injury model. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2023, 21, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Cao, Y.; Gou, Q.; Song, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Q.; Zhu, X.; Li, S. Smart carrageenan/carboxymethyl cellulose films combined with zein/gellan gum microcapsules encapsulated by composite anthocyanins for chilled beef freshness monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 153, 110059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Oun, A.A.; Shin, G.H.; Rhim, J.W.; Kim, J.T. Recent advances in polyvinyl alcohol-based composite films and their applications in food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Haghighi, H.; Gullo, M.; La China, S.; Pfeifer, F.; Siesler, H.W.; Licciardello, F.; Pulvirenti, A. Characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on gelatin/polyvinyl alcohol blend reinforced with bacterial cellulose nanowhiskers for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, W.; Khan, A.; Ezati, P.; Priyadarshi, R.; Sani, M.A.; Rathod, N.B.; Goksen, G.; Rhim, J.W. Advances in sustainable food packaging applications of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol blend films. Food Chem. 2024, 443, 138506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. Eco-friendly natural extract loaded antioxidative chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol based active films for food packaging. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06550. [Google Scholar]
  119. Chen, X.; Li, W.; Hu, S.; Akhmedov, N.G.; Reed, D.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Polyvinyl alcohol coating induced preferred crystallographic orientation in aqueous zinc battery anodes. Nano Energy 2022, 98, 107269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Park, M.J.; Gonzales, R.R.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; Phuntsho, S.; Shon, H.K. Hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol coating on hydrophobic electrospun nanofiber membrane for high performance thin film composite forward osmosis membrane. Desalination 2018, 426, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sakarkar, S.; Muthukumaran, S.; Jegatheesan, V. Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) loading in the PVA/titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin film coating on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for the removal of textile dyes. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cheng, W.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ma, J.; Zhang, T. Constructing anti-scaling and anti-wetting polyvinyl alcohol layers through spray-coating with improved water permeability in membrane distillation. Desalination 2023, 545, 116161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kanatt, S.R. Development of active/intelligent food packaging film containing Amaranthus leaf extract for shelf life extension of chicken/fish during chilled storage. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Alpaslan, D.; Dudu, T.E.; Şahiner, N.; Aktas, N. Synthesis and preparation of responsive poly (Dimethyl acrylamide/gelatin and pomegranate extract) as a novel food packaging material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 110339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Etxabide, A.; Maté, J.I.; Kilmartin, P.A. Effect of curcumin, betanin and anthocyanin containing colourants addition on gelatin films properties for intelligent films development. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 115, 106593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Karaca, I.M.; Haskaraca, G.; Ayhan, Z.; Gültekin, E. Development of real time-pH sensitive intelligent indicators for monitoring chicken breast freshness/spoilage using real packaging practices. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chalitangkoon, J.; Monvisade, P. Synthesis of chitosan-based polymeric dyes as colorimetric pH-sensing materials: Potential for food and biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 260, 117836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Khanjanzadeh, H.; Park, B.D. Covalent immobilization of bromocresol purple on cellulose nanocrystals for use in pH-responsive indicator films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fatehi, F.; Khalili Sadrabad, E.; Feilizadeh, M.; Derakhshan, Z.; Kochaki, S.H.; Hekmatimoghaddam, S.; Jebali, A.; Mohajeri, F.A. Designing the pH-sensitive indicator based on starch nanoparticle with bromocresol green for monitoring meat spoilage. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2024, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Li, N.; Zhou, S.; Yang, X.; Lin, D. Applications of natural polysaccharide-based pH-sensitive films in food packaging: Current research and future trends. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 82, 103200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hailu, F.W.; Fanta, S.W.; Tsige, A.A.; Delele, M.A. Current Status and Challenges of Colorimetric Intelligent Packaging for Fruit and Vegetables: A Review. J. Food Qual. 2025, 1, 6669828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wu, X.; Yan, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Luan, M.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and characterization of pH-sensitive intelligent packaging films based on cassava starch/polyvinyl alcohol matrices containing Aronia melanocarpa anthocyanins. LWT 2024, 194, 115818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nath, V.A.; Vijayakumar, R.; Leena, M.M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Co-electrospun-electrosprayed ethyl cellulose-gelatin nanocomposite pH-sensitive membrane for food quality applications. Food Chem. 2022, 394, 133420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Xie, C.; Wang, C.; Zhong, Y.; Fan, K. Recent advances in pH-sensitive indicator films based on natural colorants for smart monitoring of food freshness: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 64, 12800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kumar, Y.; Bist, Y.; Thakur, D.; Nagar, M.; Saxena, D.C. A review on the role of pH-sensitive natural pigments in biopolymers based intelligent food packaging films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 276, 133869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pang, S.; Wang, Y.; Jia, H.; Hao, R.; Jan, M.; Li, S.; Pu, Y.; Dong, X.; Pan, J. The properties of pH-responsive gelatin-based intelligent film as affected by ultrasound power and purple cabbage anthocyanin dose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 230, 123156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zheng, L.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Shao, P. Novel trends and applications of natural pH-responsive indicator film in food packaging for improved quality monitoring. Food Control 2022, 134, 108769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yun, D.; He, Y.; Zhu, H.; Hui, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, D.; Liu, J. Smart packaging films based on locust bean gum, polyvinyl alcohol, the crude extract of Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum petals and its purified fractions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 205, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ding, F.; Wu, R.; Huang, X.; Shi, J.; Zou, X. Anthocyanin loaded composite gelatin films crosslinked with oxidized alginate for monitoring spoilage of flesh foods. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 42, 101255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Bertolo, M.R.V.; Fernandes, S.S.; Lemes, A.C.; da Cruz Silva, G.; Junior, S.B.; de Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Egea, M.B. Intelligent and active biodegradable biopolymeric films containing carotenoids. Food Chem. 2023, 434, 137454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Halloub, A.; Raji, M.; Essabir, H.; Nekhlaoui, S.; Bensalah, M.O.; Bouhfid, R.; el kacem Qaiss, A. Stable smart packaging betalain-based from red prickly pear covalently linked into cellulose/alginate blend films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Tan, S.; Tan, G.; Zhang, H.; Xia, N.; Jiang, L.; Ren, H.; Rayan, A.M. Intelligent colorimetric soy protein isolate-based films incorporated with curcumin through an organic solvent-free pH-driven method: Properties, molecular interactions, and application. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 133, 107904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Medina-Jaramillo, C.; Ochoa-Yepes, O.; Bernal, C.; Famá, L. Active and smart biodegradable packaging based on starch and natural extracts. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Mohammadian, E.; Rhim, J.W.; Jafari, S.M. pH-sensitive (halochromic) smart packaging films based on natural food colorants for the monitoring of food quality and safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhou, S.; Li, N.; Peng, H.; Yang, X.; Lin, D. The development of highly pH-sensitive bacterial cellulose nanofibers/gelatin-based intelligent films loaded with anthocyanin/curcumin for the fresh-keeping and freshness detection of fresh pork. Foods 2023, 12, 3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yan, J.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, M.; Qin, Y.; Chen, H. Effects of anthocyanin-rich Kadsura coccinea extract on the physical, antioxidant, and pH-sensitive properties of biodegradable film. Food Biophys. 2022, 17, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Szadkowski, B.; Marzec, A. Chitosan vs chitin: Comparative study of functional pH bioindicators synthesized from natural red dyes and biopolymers as potential packaging additives. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 150, 109670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hossen, M.A.; Sameen, D.E.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W. Fabrication and characterization of pH-responsive intelligent films based on carboxymethyl cellulose and gelatin/curcumin/chitosan hybrid microcapsules for pork quality monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Pan, X.; Chen, G.; Xu, T.; Kong, L.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Ge, L. Gelatin-based active edible film with pH-sensing for maintaining and monitoring fish freshness. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Amjadi, S.; Emaminia, S.; Davudian, S.H.; Pourmohammad, S.; Hamishehkar, H.; Roufegarinejad, L. Preparation and characterization of gelatin-based nanocomposite containing chitosan nanofiber and ZnO nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Amin, U.; Khan, M.K.I.; Maan, A.A.; Nazir, A.; Riaz, S.; Khan, M.U.; Sultan, M.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Lorenzo, J.M. Biodegradable active, intelligent, and smart packaging materials for food applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hanani, Z.N.; Roos, Y.H.; Kerry, J.P. Use and application of gelatin as potential biodegradable packaging materials for food products. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 71, 94. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The composition of gelatin-based pH sensors.
Figure 1. The composition of gelatin-based pH sensors.
Gels 11 00327 g001
Figure 2. Functional fillers into gelatin matrices.
Figure 2. Functional fillers into gelatin matrices.
Gels 11 00327 g002
Figure 3. Types of pH-sensitive dyes.
Figure 3. Types of pH-sensitive dyes.
Gels 11 00327 g003
Table 1. Market share of gelatin from different sources.
Table 1. Market share of gelatin from different sources.
Sources of GelatinMarket Share (%)
Pig skin40%
Pig Cartilage6%
Bovine hides29.4%
Beef bones23.1%
Other sources (poultry, fish, vertebrates, and so on)1.5%
Table 2. Application of gelatin-based pH sensors for food freshness monitoring.
Table 2. Application of gelatin-based pH sensors for food freshness monitoring.
Active CarrierspH-Sensitive DyeFood SamplesStorageColor ChangepHSensitivityRef.
TimeTemp.
(°C)
Initial
(Fresh)
Final
(Spoiled)
ΔE
Value
Gelatin, Chitosan, ZnO-nanoparticlesMulberry extract (ME)Pork8 d4 °Cred to blue/green 5.76.530.55[94]
Gelatin, Oxidized chitin nanocrystals(O-ChNCs)Black rice bran anthocyaninsShrimp, Hairtail1 d25 °Crose-carmine to yellow-green7.58.27.27–10.47[95]
Gelatin, Dialdehyde starch (DS)Rosmarinic acid (RosA),
Blueberry anthocyanins extract (BAE)
Fish24 h25 °Cred to brown to dark brown7.08.210.23[149]
Gelatin, CarrageenanShikonin extracted from the gromwell (Lithospermum
erythrorhizon) root
Milk-25 °Cbright red to blue 6.64.555.7[76]
Gelatin, StarchRed cabbage extractsMilk-25 °Cred to green/yellow 6.84.0-[83]
gelatin, Polyvinyl alcohol (pva)Amaranthus leaf extractChicken12 d2–4 °Cpink to yellow5.58.622.13[123]
Gelatin, Bacterial cellulose nanofibersCurcumin/Anthocyanin (Cur/ATH)Pork4 d4 °Cyellow to red5.76.755.83[145]
Gelatin hydrolysate (GELH), Furcellaran (FUR),Rosemary extract from dry
leaves (DRE))
Carp (Cyprinus carpio)14 d4 °Cgreen to red 5.87.056.67[77]
Gelatin, Lavender essential oilAlizarin (ALI)Shrimp3 d25 °Cyellow to brown-red7.58.255[100]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, R. From Lab to Shelf: Gelatin-Based pH Sensors Revolutionizing Food Packaging. Gels 2025, 11, 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050327

AMA Style

Wang R. From Lab to Shelf: Gelatin-Based pH Sensors Revolutionizing Food Packaging. Gels. 2025; 11(5):327. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050327

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ruirui. 2025. "From Lab to Shelf: Gelatin-Based pH Sensors Revolutionizing Food Packaging" Gels 11, no. 5: 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050327

APA Style

Wang, R. (2025). From Lab to Shelf: Gelatin-Based pH Sensors Revolutionizing Food Packaging. Gels, 11(5), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11050327

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop