You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Gels
  • Correction
  • Open Access

Published: 9 September 2025

Correction: Son et al. Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity. Gels 2025, 11, 636

,
and
1
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
3
Medical Center Boulevard, Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27104, USA
4
School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Wake Forest University-Virginia Tech, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine
The authors would like to make the following corrections to []. The changes are as follows:
Missing citations
In the original publication, the last row of Table 3 had citations missing. We have added the references’ citations in the last row of the corrected Table 3.
Table 3. Comparison of 3D bioprinting technologies for vascular engineering.
Table 3. Comparison of 3D bioprinting technologies for vascular engineering.
StrategyResolutionScalabilityMaterial VersatilityECM FidelityCompatibility with Bottom-Up Strategies References
Sacrificial PrintingModerate (~100–500 µm)Moderate–HighHigh–wide ink compatibilityModerate–HighHigh[13,20,121–132]
Coaxial ExtrusionLow (~500–1000 µm)High: continuous strand, rapidLimited: mainly alginate-based materialsLow–moderate: limited ECM mimicryLow[6,133–148]
Embedded PrintingHigh (≤20 µm)Moderate–High: Scalable but time-intensiveVery High: compatible with soft ECM bioinksHigh: native-like composition and stiffnessModerate–High[15,19,149–161]
Light-Based PrintingVery High (≤10 µm)Low–Moderate: high speed but small volumeLow: constrained to photopolymerizable inksLow–Moderate: depends on photoink tuningNot necessary[86,162–175]
The updated references’ citations Refs. [162–175] in the original are Refs. [167–180], Refs. [176–180] in the original are Refs. [162–166], we have changed the order of references and have adjusted accordingly. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Son, J.; Li, S.; Jeong, W. Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity. Gels 2025, 11, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.