Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
FluidsFluids
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 June 2020

A Note on Bi-Orthogonal Polynomials and Functions

Section of Mathematics, Uninettuno University, 00186 Roma, Italy
This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Numerical Advances in Fluid Mechanics, Volume II

Abstract

The theory of orthogonal polynomials is well established and detailed, covering a wide field of interesting results, as, in particular, for solving certain differential equations. On the other side the concepts and the related formalism of the theory of bi-orthogonal polynomials is less developed and much more limited. By starting from the orthogonality properties satisfied from the ordinary and generalized Hermite polynomials, it is possible to derive a further family (known in literature) of these kind of polynomials, which are bi-orthogonal with their adjoint. This aspect allows us to introduce functions recognized as bi-orthogonal and investigate generalizations of families of orthogonal polynomials

1. Introduction

The topic of bi-ortogonality will be treated while using the formalism and the operational properties satisfied by different classes of polynomials recognizable as generalized Hermite polynomials [1,2]. The consolidated approach to the study of the characteristics of orthogonality and, although less developed, the one related to the concept of bi-ortogonality will be reread on the different formalism that can be obtained from the various relations deducible from the structure of the different polynomials and the related functions that are attributable to the family of Hermite polynomials [3,4,5]. The fulcrum of the discussion is based on the two-dimensional extension of Hermite polynomials
H n ( x ) H ( m , n ) ( x ,   y ) ,
where we consider the variables as real and the indexes positive integers.

2. Orthogonality and Bi-Orthogonality

By starting from the space L w 2 ( a ,   b ) and by considering a real function w ( x ) on the interval ( a ,   b ) , non-negative, measurable, and non-zero, we can define the inner product (if for every f ( x ) L w 2 ( a ,   b ) , f ( x ) 2 w ( x ) is Lebesgue integrable):
< f , g > = def ( f ,   g ) w : = a b f ( x ) g ( x ) w ( x ) d x
which define an Hilbert space. The functions f and g will be said orthogonal, if:
< f , g > = 0
and the function w ( x ) is usually referred as the weight function.
Remark 1.
For our purpose, it is not necessary to introduce the concept of orthogonality through the Lebesgue–Stieltjes integral, by introducing a general measure m ( x ) on R , by assuming that:
x k L w 2 ( a ,   b ) , k N
i.e., the moment sequence μ k , k = 0 , 1 , finite, μ k : = a b x k w ( x ) d x , with w ( x ) > 0 .
Under these hypothesis, we can construct the Hankel determinant, which allows us to define the family of orthogonal polynomials by the following:
P 0 ( x ) = μ 0 1 2 P n ( x ) = 1 H n H n + 1 μ 0 μ n 1 x n
where
H n + 1 = μ 0 μ n μ n μ 2 n
In a more direct way, a sequence of polynomials { P n ( x ) } n = 0 + is said orthogonal if, for any n , m N , we have:
(i)
P n ( x ) is a polynomial of exactly degree n
(ii)
< P n , P m > = K n δ n , m
K n > 0 , δ n , m denotes the Kronecker delta. The sequence is said to be orthonormal if:
(ii)’
< P n , P m > = δ n , m
To introduce the bi-orthogonality, we need to define a totally positive kernel [6]; that is a two-variable continuous real function K ( x ,   y ) , such that, for all:
x 1 < x 2 < < x m , y 1 < y 2 < < y m
it holds that
d e t [ K ( x i ,   y i ) ] 1 i , j m > 0
By assuming the above condition and, furthermore, that the integrals involved are defined and finite, we can define an inner (bi-)product.
Let p , q P , we said, non-symmetric inner (bi-)product, the relation:
< p ( x ) , q ( x ) > : = D p ( x ) q ( y ) K ( x ,   y ) d x d y
where P is the space of real polynomials, D , D R 2 .
To better understand the nature of bi-orthogonality, we set the following.
Definition 1.
Two sequences of polynomials { P n ( x ) } n = 0 + and { Q n ( x ) } n = 0 + are said to be bi-orthogonal polynomial sequences, if for any n , m N , we have:
(i) 
P n ( x ) and Q m ( x ) are polynomials of exactly degree n and m, respectively
(ii) 
< P n , Q m > = K n δ n , m , K n > 0
If K n = 1 the sequences are said bi-orthonormal.
Remark 2.
In general, since the above definition, we have:
< P n , Q m > < Q m , P n >
This standard definition of bi-orthogonality is strictly based on the concept of orthogonality [6,7,8]. It is useful to note that, with Cauchy kernel:
1 / x + y
we obtain biorthogonal polynomials, called Cauchy biorthogonal polynomials, which appear in the study of special solutions to the dispersive non-linear partial differential equation, called the Degasperis–Procesi (DP) equation, which represents an approximate model for wave propagation [9].
In the next sections, we will describe the bi-orthogonality relations for a special class of Hermite polynomials, which can be seen as a particular case of the previous definition, but from the other side, as a first step to generalize the concept itself in a different context.

4. Relevant Relations Involving Bi-Orthogonal Hermite Functions

In the previous sections, we have introduced the one-variable, one-index Hermite polynomials H n ( x ) , and their generalization H n ( x ,   y ) . It is possible to use the polynomials H n ( x ) to introduce a different class of Hermite polynomials with two indexes and two variables, which are a vectorial extension (as discussed in [18]); this means that from an index acts on a one-dimensional variable, we will have a couple of indexes acting on a two-dimensional variable:
H n ( x ) H m , n ( x ,   y )
Let the positive quadratic form:
q ( x ,   y ) = a x 2 + 2 b x y + c y 2 ,    a , c > 0 ,    Δ = a c b 2 > 0
where a , b , c are real numbers and the associated matrix reads:
M ^ = a b b c , c i M ^ > 0
and by considering a vector z ̲ = x y in the space R 2 , it follows:
q ( z ̲ ) = z ̲ t M ^ z ̲
q ( z ̲ ) = ( x y ) a b b c x y = a x 2 + 2 b x y + c y 2
Definition 3.
We will call two-index, two-variable Hermite polynomials, indicated with the symbol H m , n ( x ,   y ) , the polynomials defined by the following generating function:
e z ̲ t M ^ h ̲ 1 2 h ̲ t M ^ h ̲ = m = 0 + n = 0 + t m m ! u n n ! H m , n ( x ,   y )
where:
z ̲ = x y , h ̲ = t u R 2   w i t h   t u , ( | t | , | u | ) < +
These polynomials are exploited in many fields of pure and applied mathematics, they are very useful in the description of the quantum treatment of coupled harmonic oscillator [19].
By using the definition of the quadratic form, we can introduce the related adjoint class of these polynomials, by setting:
q ¯ ( z ̲ ) = z ̲ t M ^ 1 z ̲
we have:
e v ̲ t M ^ 1 k ̲ 1 2 k ̲ t M ^ 1 k ̲ = m = 0 + n = 0 + r m m ! s n n ! G m , n ( x ,   y )
where:
v ̲ = ξ η , k ̲ = r s R 2   with   v ̲ = M ^ z ̲   and   r s , ( | r | , | s | ) < +
The expression of the generating function defining the adjoint Hermite polynomials of two-index and two-variable G m , n ( x ,   y ) , could be recast in the following form:
e z ̲ t k ̲ 1 2 k ̲ t M ^ 1 k ̲ = m = 0 + n = 0 + r m m ! s n n ! G m , n ( x ,   y )
The above introduced vectorial Hermite polynomials satisfy, with their adjoints, many and relevant properties. It is now interesting to explore the possibility to find similar Hermite functions as those that are defined in the previous section, in order to obtain an extension of the concepts and the related identities satisfied from the Hermite polynomials H m , n ( x ,   y ) and their adjoints G m , n ( x ,   y ) .
The structure of the vectorial extension Hermite polynomials is based on the fact that a vector index acts on a vector variable or, which is the same, a couple of indexes act on a couple of variables. This suggests that we can not expect the same relation linking the two-index, two-variable Hermite polynomials H m , n ( x ,   y ) and G m , n ( x ,   y ) , and the related Hermite functions we are going to define; moreover, the concept of orthogonality is not the same as the existing one for the one-index Hermite polynomials of type H n ( x ) and H n ( x ,   y ) . The two-index, two-variable Hermite polynomials H m , n ( x ,   y ) and their adjoints G m , n ( x ,   y ) satisfy the following bi-orthogonality condition (result already discussed in detail in [18]):
+ d y + H m , n ( x ,   y ) G r , s ( x ,   y ) e 1 2 z ̲ t M ^ z ̲ d x = 2 π Δ m ! n ! δ m , r δ n , s
Remark 3.
The proof is based on the definition of the generating functions and use the vectorial techniques of differentiation. The weight function:
e 1 2 z ̲ t M ^ z ̲
is easily recognized similar to the related weight function for the ordinary Hermite polynomials H n ( x ) . We can use the above result to define functions that are based on the two-index, two-variable Hermite polynomials.
Definition 4.
Let the Hermite polynomials H m , n ( x ,   y ) and G m , n ( x ,   y ) we call two-index, two-variable Hermite functions, the functions defined in the following way:
H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = Δ 4 2 π 1 m ! n ! H m , n ( x ,   y ) e 1 4 z ̲ t M ^ 1 z ̲
G ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = Δ 4 2 π 1 m ! n ! G m , n ( x ,   y ) e 1 4 z ̲ t M ^ 1 z ̲
which are obviously bi-orthonormal.
We see how to extend the differential relations showed for the polynomials H n ( x ) to emphasize the relevance of the bi-orthogonal Hermite functions.
We start to observe that the Hermite polynomials of type H m , n ( x ,   y ) and G m , n ( x ,   y ) solve the following partial differential equation:
τ S m , n ( x ,   y ; τ ) = 1 2 x y M ^ 1 x y S m , n ( x ,   y ; τ )
satisfying the conditions at τ = 0
S m , n ( x ,   y ; 0 ) = ξ m η n ,   when S m , n = H m , n x m y n ,   when S m , n = G m , n
Remark 4.
The proof is an immediate consequence of the properties satisfied by the polynomials H m , n ( x ,   y ) and G m , n ( x ,   y ) , deduced by their structure, while using the similar well-known relations of the ordinary Hermite polynomials, by defining the following shift operators:
a ^ + , 0 = 1 2 ( a x + b y ) x ,    a ^ , 0 = 1 Δ c x b y + 1 2 x
a ^ 0 , + = 1 2 ( b x + c y ) y ,    a ^ 0 , = 1 Δ b x a y + 1 2 y
where Δ = a c b 2 is the determinant of the quadratic form that is defined above.
The above operators are free from any parameters, not presenting any index variable in their structure, therefore different from the shift operators related to Hermite polynomials. The action of these operators could be summarized, as follows:
a ^ + , 0 H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = m + 1 H ¯ m + 1 , n ,    a ^ , 0 H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = m H ¯ m 1 , n ( x ,   y )
a ^ 0 , + H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = n + 1 H ¯ m , n + 1 ,    a ^ 0 , H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = n H ¯ m , n 1 ( x ,   y )
By virtue of the above relations, we can state the important result concerning the partial differential equation that is solved by the bi-orthogonal Hermite functions [18]:
̲ z t M ^ 1 ̲ z m + n + 1 1 4 z ̲ t M ^ z ̲ H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = 0
where z ̲ = x y and ̲ z = x y
Remark 5.
To prove the statement, we use the following operational relations:
a ^ + , 0 a ^ , 0 H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = m H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y )
a ^ 0 , + a ^ 0 , H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) = n H ¯ m , n ( x ,   y )
which emphasizes the similarity with the orthogonality relation previous established for the ordinary Hermite polynomials:
a ^ + a ^ h e n ( x ) = n h e n ( x )
To state the analogous result for the functions G ¯ m , n ( x ,   y ) it is sufficient to remind that the adjoint quadratic form:
q ¯ ( z ̲ ) = z ̲ t M ^ 1 z ̲
which introduced the variable:
v ̲ = M ^ z ̲ ,   where v ̲ = ξ η

5. Further Investigations

The previous discussed Hermite polynomials and related bi-orthogonal functions satisfy a plethora of relevant relations, for instance in [10,14,20,21,22], but it is much more interesting to explore how the particular bi-orthogonality relation could be extend to other families of classical orthogonal polynomials [23,24]. Note that ordinary and generalized Laguerre and Legendre polynomials [25,26,27], for example, as well as Chebyshev polynomials [28,29,30,31,32], could be expressed in terms of polynomials recognized as Hermite. Regarding the generalized Laguerre polynomials:
2 L n ( x , y ) = H n y , D ^ x 1
where: 2 L n ( x ,   y ) = n ! r = 0 [ n / 2 ] y n 2 r x r ( n 2 r ) ! ( r ! ) 2 , D ^ x 1 the inverse of derivative operator for the Legendre polynomials, it holds:
2 L n ( x ,   y ) 1 4 ( 1 y 2 ) , y = P n ( y )
where:
P n ( y ) = n ! r = 0 [ n / 2 ] ( 1 ) n 2 r y r ( 1 y 2 ) n 2 r ( n 2 r ) ! ( r ! ) 2 2 2 ( n 2 r )
Regarding the Chebyshev polynomials of first and second kind, for t R , we have:
U n ( x ) = 1 n ! 0 + e t t n H n 2 x , 1 t d t
T n ( x ) = 1 2 ( n 1 ) ! 0 + e t t n 1 H n 2 x , 1 t d t
or, more in general:
U n ( x ,   y ) = 1 n ! 0 + e t t n H n x , y t d t
and, furthermore:
U n ( x ,   y ) ( m ) = 1 n ! 0 + e t t n H n ( m ) x , y t d t
where:
U n ( x ,   y ) ( m ) = r = 0 [ n / m ] ( n r ) ! x n m r y r r ! ( n m r ) ! ,    H n ( m ) ( x ,   y ) = r = 0 [ n / m ] n ! x n m r y r r ! ( n m r ) !
The above relations are some examples of the plethora of generalizations for many families of orthogonal polynomials and special functions; this emphasizes the powerful tool that is represented by the wide family of those polynomials recognized as Hermite polynomials.
Before concluding, it is worth noting that the bivariate orthogonal Hermite polynomials [33]:
H n , m ( x , y ; Λ ) = k = 0 m i n ( n ,   m ) ( 1 ) k k ! m k n k a ( n k ) / 2 b k c ( m k ) / 2 H n k e a x + b y a H m k e b x + c y c
present the same structure of the two-index, two-variable Hermite polynomials defined in Section 4 as well as other parabolic polynomials, recognized as belonging to the Hermite family, showed by A. Wünsche [34]. In a forthcoming article, we can deep discuss the analogy and differences between these different classes of Hermite polynomials.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Appell, P.; De Fériet, J.K. Fonctions hypergéométriques et hypersphériques: Polynomes d’Hermite; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1926. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gould, H.W.; Hopper, A. Operational formulas connected with two generalizations of Hermite polynomials. Duke Math. J. 1962, 29, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koornwinder, T.H. Orthogonal Polynomials in Two Variables Which Are Eigenfunctions of Two Independent Partial Differential Operators, 2: Prepublication; Stichting Mathematisch Centrum. Toegepaste Wiskunde TW 137/73; Stichting Mathematisch Centrum: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973; Volume 77. [Google Scholar]
  4. Koornwinder, T.H. Orthogonal Polynomials in Two Variables Which Are Eigenfunctions of Two Algebraically Independent Partial Differential Operators. III; Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings); Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974; Volume 36, pp. 357–369. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cesarano, C.; Cennamo, G.M.; Placidi, L. Operational methods for Hermite polynomials with applications. rn 2014, 2, 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertola, M.; Gekhtman, M.; Szmigielski, J. Cauchy biorthogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory 2010, 162, 832–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bertola, M. Biorthogonal polynomials for two-matrix models with semiclassical potentials. J. Approx. Theory 2007, 144, 162–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bertola, M.; Eynard, B.; Harnad, J. Duality, Biorthogonal Polynomials and Multi-Matrix Models. Commun. Math. Phys. 2002, 229, 73–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bertola, M.; Gekhtman, M.; Szmigielski, J. Cubic string boundary value problems and Cauchy biorthogonal polynomials. J. A Phys. Math. Theor. 2009, 42, 454006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Cesarano, C. Operational methods and new identities for Hermite polynomials. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 2017, 12, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Srivastava, H.; Manocha, H. Treatise on Generating Functions; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dattoli, G.; Ottaviani, P.; Torre, A.; Vázquez, L. Evolution operator equations: Integration with algebraic and finitedifference methods. Applications to physical problems in classical and quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. La Riv. Del Nuovo Cimento (1978–1999) 1997, 20, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dattoli, G. Hermite-Bessel and Laguerre-Bessel functions: A by-product of the monomiality principle. In Proceedings of the Melfi School on Advanced Topics in Mathematics and Physics, Melfi, Italy, 9–12 May 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dattoli, G.; Cesarano, C. On a new family of Hermite polynomials associated to parabolic cylinder functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 141, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dattoli, G.; Ricci, P.; Cesarano, C. A note on multi-index polynomials of Dickson type and their applications in quantum optics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 145, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  16. Dattoli, G.; Lorenzutta, S.; Cesarano, C.; Ricci, P. Second level exponentials and families of Appell polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2002, 13, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dattoli, G.; Lorenzutta, S.; Ricci, P.; Cesarano, C. On a family of hybrid polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2004, 15, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cesarano, C.; Fornaro, C.; Vazquez, L. Operational results in bi-orthogonal Hermite functions. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2016, 85, 43–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, Y.S.; Noz, M.E. Phase Space Picture of Quantum Mechanics: Group Theoretical Approach; World Scientific: Singapore, 1991; Volume 40. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dattoli, G.; Lorenzutta, S.; Cesarano, C. Bernstein Polynomials and Operational Methods. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2016, 8, 369–377. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cesarano, C. Multi-dimensional Chebyshev polynomials: A non-conventional approach. Commun. Appl. Ind. Math. 2019, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dattoli, G.; Ricci, P.E.; Cesarano, C. The Bessel functions and the Hermite polynomials from a unified point of view. Appl. Anal. 2001, 80, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cesarano, C.; Cennamo, G.M.; Placidi, L. Humbert polynomials and functions in terms of Hermite polynomials towards applications to wave propagation. WSEAS Trans. Math. 2014, 13, 595–602. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cesarano, C.; Assante, D. A note on generalized Bessel functions. Int. J. Math. Model. Methods Appl. Sci. 2013, 7, 625–629. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dattoli, G.; Srivastava, H.M.; Cesarano, C. The Laguerre and Legendre polynomials from an operational point of view. Appl. Math. Comput. 2001, 124, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cesarano, C.; Ricci, P.E. The Legendre polynomials as a basis for Bessel functions. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2016, 111, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Cesarano, C.; Germano, B.; Ricci, P. Laguerre-type Bessel functions. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2005, 16, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cesarano, C. Identities and generating functions on Chebyshev polynomials. Georgian Math. J. 2012, 19, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cesarano, C. Generalized Chebyshev polynomials. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014, 43, 731–740. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cesarano, C. Integral representations and new generating functions of Chebyshev polynomials. Hacet. J. Math. Stat 2015, 44, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cesarano, C.; Pinelas, S.; Ricci, P.E. The third and fourth kind pseudo-Chebyshev polynomials of half-integer degree. Symmetry 2019, 11, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cesarano, C.; Fornaro, C. A note on two-variable Chebyshev polynomials. Georgian Math. J. 2017, 24, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dimitrov, D.; Godoy, E. Zero sets of bivariate Hermite polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2015, 421, 830–841. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wünsche, A. Generalized Hermite polynomials associated with functions of parabolic cylinder. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 141, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.