Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Production Process of Recombinant Mature Serratiopeptidase in Escherichia coli Using Fed-Batch Culture by Self-Proteolytic Activity of Fusion Protein
Previous Article in Journal
Kefir Enriched with Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Leaves Extract as a New Ingredient during a Gluten-Free Bread-Making Process
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Isolation and Characterization of Flavonoids from Fermented Dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.), and Assessment of Its Antioxidant Actions In Vitro and In Vivo

Fermentation 2022, 8(7), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8070306
by Na Yin 1,2,†, Yuan Wang 1,2,†, Xuerong Ren 1,2, Yang Zhao 1,2, Na Liu 1,2, Xiaoping An 1,2,* and Jingwei Qi 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Fermentation 2022, 8(7), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8070306
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 25 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial Fermentation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors carried out the fermentation of dandelion with a yeast-LAB culture, and then the isolation and characterization of flavonoids were performed. The research idea is original, but at the moment it can not be accepted in the present form. Comments and suggestions on fermentation-1746888:

  • I believe that the characterization of flavonoids in unfermented dandelions should be also provided in the current study to compare the beneficial effects of fermentation.
  • Please provide more information about bioactive compounds in dandelions (introduction part).
  • The aim of the work should be emphasized and the statement of the novelty should appear.
  • The methodology of preparation of PFDF - On what basis were the fermentation conditions selected? Also, why were such amounts of water or alcohol as well as time and temperature set?
  • Subsection 2.7.3. should be more specified.
  • The information about supplementary materials should be provided in the manuscript. According to the instructions for authors the following information should be stated: “Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Figure S1: title; Table S1: title; Video S1: title.” Moreover, in the file with the supplementary materials the tables should be named, i.e. Table S1, Table S2, etc. Please indicate also in the manuscript description of the tables.
  • The values given in the text do not always correspond to the values in figures 6B, 6D, and 6F.
  • All the abbreviations that appeared in the tables should be defined in the table footers.
  • The manuscript has a very weak discussion of the results and it should be definitely improved.

 

Minor suggestions:

  • Line 58 - The more common name of the family to that dandelions belong is the family Asteraceae.
  • Line 58 – delete “(dandelion)”
  • Lines 67, 99-100, 114-115, etc. - use italics for microorganisms' name
  • Line 100 – the proper name for the L. plantarum should be used according to the new nomenclature.
  • Line 103-106, 153, etc. – use the subscripts in the structures of used chemicals.
  • Line 116 – improve the number of microorganisms.
  • Line 213 – Artemia salina should be written in italics.
  • Line 321 – improve the sentence
  • “O” in the names of the chemicals should be written in italics.
  • Line 354 – “VC” should be defined
  • The reference list should be prepared according to the instructions for the authors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor, dear Authors,

I have carefully read the manuscript entitled “Isolation and characterization of flavonoids from fermented dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.), and assessment of its antioxidant actions in vitro and in vivo” and find it very insightful and significant for the scientific community. The manuscript is interesting, well written and well structured, the available scientific data are summarized and discussed clearly.

I suggest that the paper should be accepted after some minor corrections listed bellow:

*** In the whole text, in vivo and in vitro must be italic ***

Introduction

- line 67-68 names of microorganisms must be italic!

- expand the part about potential of fermentation of dandelions in this part

- avoid using “we” and “our” through the whole paper

Materials and Methods

- line 99-100, line 114 – names of microorganisms must be italic!

- Authors should define the procedure for preparation of microorganisms for inoculum, determination of concentration, and all further steps which were involved in the experiment

- line 263 – reference is not presented as reference number

Results

- in all analyses were done in duplicate; the obtained results must be presented as mean ± st. dev.

Conclusions

 

This part needs to be expanded with all necessary details, and further steps

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all the comments and suggestions, as well as, carefully improved the manuscript. I have only one more suggestion - in Tables 1 & 2 please use the subscripts in the chemical formulas.

Back to TopTop