Next Article in Journal
Effect of Aspergillus niger Fermentation on the Metabolites in Corn Stalks
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Fermentation Yield of Doramectin from Streptomyces avermitilis N72 by Strain Selection and Glucose Supplementation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Kombucha Healthy Drink—Recent Advances in Production, Chemical Composition and Health Benefits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research Progress on the Effect of Autolysis to Bacillus subtilis Fermentation Bioprocess
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/fermentation9010049
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase

by
Yi-Hao Huang
1,†,
Weir-Chiang You
2,†,
Yung-Ju Chen
1,
Jhih-Ying Ciou
1 and
Lu-Sheng Hsieh
1,*
1
Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Health, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fermentation 2023, 9(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010049
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 1 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Microorganisms and Industrial/Food Enzymes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aspartate ammonia-lyase (AAL) catalyzes the reversible conversion reactions of aspartate to fumaric acid and ammonia. In this work, Lactobacillus paracasei LpAAL gene was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli. As well as a recombinant His-tagged LpAAL protein, a maltose-binding protein (MBP) fused LpAAL protein was used to enhance its protein solubility and expression level. Both recombinant proteins showed broad substrate specificity, catalyzing aspartic acid, fumaric acid, phenylalanine, and tyrosine to produce fumaric acid, aspartic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, and p-coumaric acid, respectively. The optimum reaction pH and temperature of LpAAL protein for four substrates were measured at 8.0 and 40 °C, respectively. The Km values of LpAAL protein for aspartic acid, fumaric acid, phenylalanine, and tyrosine as substrates were 5.7, 8.5, 4.4, and 1.2 mM, respectively. The kcat values of LpAAL protein for aspartic acid, fumaric acid, phenylalanine, and tyrosine as substrates were 6.7, 0.45, 4.96, and 0.02 s−1, respectively. Therefore, aspartic acid, fumaric acid, phenylalanine, and tyrosine are bona fide substrates for LpAAL enzyme.

1. Introduction

Aspartate ammonia-lyase (AAL, EC 4.3.1.1), which catalyzes the reversible non-oxidative deamination of L-aspartic acid to fumaric acid (Figure 1), is an important part of the link between amino acid metabolism and organic acid metabolism [1]. AAL enzyme activity is widely present in various microorganisms and has been purified from thermophilic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescent, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus thermophilus [2,3,4,5]. Escherichia coli AAL (eAAL) protein has been studied extensively; the eAAL protein is composed of 477 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 52 kDa, which is a tetrameric enzyme consisting of four identical subunits [2,3]. Its crystal structure has been elucidated, and it has been shown that the catalysis reaction must be carried out under Mg2+ and alkaline conditions [2,6,7]. The bAAL protein purified from Bacillus thermophilus is similar in molecular weight to other AAL proteins from mesophilic microorganisms and is a homotetrameric protein, but shows different biochemical properties with eAAL protein [8]. One of the most obvious features is that the bAAL protein is structurally more stable under high temperature conditions, and the catalytic reaction also requires the participation of Mg2+ under alkaline conditions [8]. Previous studies have shown that AAL proteins only accept L-aspartic acid as a substrate to catalyze the formation of fumaric acid and ammonia under deamination reaction, and lack the activity of catalyzing other L-amino acids, other unsaturated acids, or D-aspartic acid [9,10]. In other words, L-aspartic acid is a very specific substrate for AAL enzymes [9,10]. However, it is later shown that the AAL proteins are capable of catalyzing other substrates. The AAL protein purified from Pseudomonas aeruginosa not only catalyzes the reverse reaction of L-aspartic acid to generate fumaric acid and ammonia, but also catalyzes L- phenylalanine to form trans-cinnamic acid [11].
Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL, EC 4.3.1.24) can utilize L-phenylalanine as a substrate to generate trans-cinnamic acid and ammonia under non-oxidative deamination reaction [12,13]. Its product, trans-cinnamic acid, is then functioned as an important intermediate in the plant phenylpropanoid pathway, being utilized as precursors for thousands of compounds, such as tannins, flavonoids, lignin, etc. [12,13]. PAL proteins from dicot plants are reported to exhibit high specificity to its substrate phenylalanine, whereas, in our previous studies, that monocot plant Bambusa oldhamii phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 4 protein (BoPAL4, EC 4.3.1.25) is a dual functional phenylalanine-tyrosine ammonia-lyase (PTAL) enzyme, catalyzing trans-cinnamic acid and p-coumaric acid production from L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine via its PAL and tyrosine ammonia-lyase (TAL) activities [13].
Lactobacillus paracasei is a Gram-positive, heterotrophic Lactobacillus, distributed in a variety of media, including many fermented dairy products, vegetables, and the human gastrointestinal tract [14,15]. Because of its industrial value and health-promoting potential, Lactobacillus paracasei has been extensively studied and used as probiotic [16] and is believed to have various health-promoting properties for humans, including antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and biologics such as microbiological modulation intestinal bacteria [14]. Although AAL protein function was studied in Lactobacilli [17,18], our understanding of AAL enzyme in this Genus is still very limited. In addition, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAL protein is reported to have PAL enzymatic activity in 2017 [11], which aroused our interest in the hypothesis that AAL may have similar substrate specificity as bamboo PALs [12,13]. In this study, we further examined and proved that Lactobacillus paracasei AAL (LpAAL) has both PAL and TAL activities by using the BoPAL4 protein as a control group to comprehensively study the substrate specificity in the LpAAL protein.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

L-aspartic acid, fumaric acid, L-phenylalanine, L-tyrosine, trans-cinnamic acid, and p-coumaric acid were obtained from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA). Reagents for protein electrophoresis and molecular biology manipulations were described in previous publications [12,13,19,20].

2.2. Construction of the Expression Vectors

The full-length LpAAL gene was chemically synthetic by MDBio, Inc. (New Taipei City, Tai wan) and then subcloned into pET28a plasmid for making pET28a-LpAAL plasmid (Table 1). The LpAAL gene fragment was amplified from pET28a-LpAAL plasmid by a PCR reaction and then subcloned into pMAL-c2x plasmid for making a maltose-binding protein fused LpAAL protein (Table 1).

2.3. E. coli Strains and Protein Expression Conditions

E. coli Top10 strain was used for recombinant BoPAL4 protein expression [13]. E. coli DH5α and BL21(DE3) strains were used for plasmid storage and for LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL expression, respectively. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells carrying the expression plasmids (Table 1) were grown at 30 °C in Luria-Bertani medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl, and pH 7.0) supplemented with 100 mg/mL ampicillin or 50 mg/mL kanamycin. The expression of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins was induced at 30 °C with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 4 h. Cells were centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min, and pellets were stored at −20 °C freezer before use.

2.4. Preparations of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL Enzymes

E. coli cells were re-dissolved with 20 mL of 1× lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM imidazole, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF) and disrupted by sonication using a Branson cell disruptor [19,20]. Cell lysates with LpAAL protein or MBP-LpAAL protein were placed in a Ni-NTA column for affinity column chromatography, and finally eluted with buffer containing 250 imidazole.

2.5. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

Purity of target proteins were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using a Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein samples on gels were stained and decolorized with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and 20% methanol. The image of the gel was captured by a Gel Doc XR+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.6. AAL-F Activity Assay

The aspartate ammonia-lyase forward reaction activity (AAL-F) was assayed by measuring the production of fumaric acid as the absorbance increased at 240 nm [21] using fumaric acid as the standard. The reaction mixture for the AAL-F assay contained 50 mM Tris−HCl, pH 8.0, 11 mM fumaric acid, and 50 μL of enzyme solution in a total volume of 1.0 mL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 3 min. AAL-F activity unit was defined as nanomole of fumaric acid formatted per minute.

2.7. AAL-R Activity Assay

The aspartate ammonia-lyase reverse reaction activity (AAL-R) was assayed by measuring the production of L-aspartic acid as the absorbance increased at 293 nm [22] using aspartic acid as the standard. The reaction mixture for the AAL-R assay contained 50 mM Tris−HCl, pH 8.0, 40 mM L-aspartic acid, and 50 μL of enzyme solution in a total volume of 1.0 mL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 6 min. AAL-R activity unit was defined as nanomole of aspartic acid formed per minute.

2.8. PAL Activity Assay

The PAL activity was assayed by measuring the production of trans-cinnamic acid as the absorbance increased at 290 nm [12] using trans-cinnamic acid as the standard. The reaction mixture for the PAL assay contained 50 mM Tris−HCl, pH 8.0, 40 mM L-phenylalanine, and 50 μL of enzyme solution in a total volume of 1.0 mL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 6 min. PAL activity was defined as nanomole of trans-cinnamic acid formed per minute.

2.9. TAL Activity Assay

The TAL activity was assayed by measuring the production of p-coumaric acid as the absorbance increased at 310 nm [12] using p-coumaric acid as the standard. The reaction mixture for the AAL-R assay contained 50 mM Tris−HCl, pH 8.0, 40 mM L-tyrosine, and 50 μL of enzyme solution in a total volume of 1.0 mL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 6 min. TAL activity was defined as nanomole of p-coumaric acid formed per minute.

2.10. Enzyme Biochemical Properties and Kinetics

To measure the optimum reaction temperature, activities’ assays were conducted at standard reaction condition in a range of temperatures from 30 to 70 °C. To measure the optimum reaction pH, activities’ assays were conducted at standard reaction condition in a range of pH from 5.0 to 9.0. To determine the kinetic parameter of AAL-F, AAL-R, PAL, and TAL, a range of concentration of L-aspartic acid, fumaric acid, L-phenylalanine, and L-tyrosine were varied from 0~20 mM, from 0~11 mM, from 0~12 mM, and from 0~2 mM, respectively. Km and kcat values were calculated from substrate saturation curves [12,13,19,20].

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the LpAAL Gene

The LpAAL gene (GenBank Accession No. EEQ60018) has an open-reading frame (ORF) of 1395 bp and can be deduced into a 464 amino acid or a 50 kDa polypeptide. The three-dimensional structure of the AAL protein monomer subunit is dominated by the α-helix, and, as a homotetramer, it contains a total of four fusion active sites, and each active site consists of three monomer sequences identified to be conserved, in which about 10 rings (SS-loop) are formed by amino acid residues with the characteristic sequence GSSxxPxKxN [2,21,23]. The sequence of the LpAAL SS-loop is G308SSIMPGKVN317.

3.2. Expression and Purification of Recombinant LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL Proteins in Escherichia coli

Initially, full length LpAAL gene was inserted in pET28a plasmid for expressing an N-terminal His-tagged LpAAL recombinant protein (Figure 2A). The solubility of recombinant LpAAL protein was low, and most of the LpAAL proteins became inclusion bodies. This result was similar to the expression of Entamoeba histolytica aspartate ammonia-lyase protein [24]. Therefore, we constructed another expression vector for expressing a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-tagged LpAAL with C-terminal His-tag for facilitating purification (Figure 2A) and stepped forward the induction conditions, including reduced induction temperature, prolonged induction time, and decreased IPTG concentration, to overcome the scenario of insoluble LpAAL proteins. The results showed that the recombinant proteins of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL purified with Ni-resin resin were separated SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining (Figure 2B). Both recombinant proteins, LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL, were migrated to their anticipated positions, and molecular weights were approximately 50 and 92.5 kDa, respectively. Therefore, E. coli expression system is capable of synthesizing LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL recombinant proteins [25].

3.3. Optimum Temperature of AAL and AAL-R Activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL Proteins

A previous study had shown that two different AAL proteins purified from Aeromonas medium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had optimal reaction temperatures of 35 °C and 40 °C [7,11]. Singh and Yadav further showed that AAL protein was more stable between 25 and 40 °C, after which it may lose AAL activity, presumably due to denaturation at higher temperatures [7,11]. Recombinant LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins purified from E. coli were both active enzymes. Our results showed that the optimal reaction temperatures of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL enzyme were both 40 °C (Figure 3A), while the optimal reaction temperatures of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of MBP-LpAAL enzyme are 45 °C and 35 °C, respectively (Figure 3B). Taken together, the optimal reaction temperature of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL recombinant proteins were comparable with other microbial AAL proteins.

3.4. Optimum pH for AAL-F and AAL-R Activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL Proteins

Normally, AAL enzymes are used to react in alkaline conditions, where the optimum pH is between 7.0 and 9.0 [23]. The optimal pH of the AAL enzyme purified from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 8.0 and 8.5, respectively [11,21]. Our result showed that the optimal reaction pH of both AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL enzyme was 8.0 (Figure 4A), while the optimal pHs of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of MBP-LpAAL enzyme were 8.5 and 8.0, respectively (Figure 4B). As a result, the optimal reaction pH of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins was comparable with other microbial AAL proteins.

3.5. Kinetic Parameters for AAL-F and AAL-R Activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL Proteins

The kinetics parameters of the LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL enzymes were studied and the Km values of the enzymes were calculated using saturation curves (Figure 5) and the Michaelis–Menten equation. After calculation, the result showed that the Km values of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins using aspartic acid as a substrate were 5.7 (Figure 5A) and 5.2 mM (Figure 5B) at pH 8.0, respectively, and were similar to that of Pseudomonas fluorescens AAL (Km = 5.1 mM) [21]. The Km values of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins using fumaric acid as a substrate were both 8.50 mM at pH 8.0 (Figure 5C,D), which is significantly different from the study showing the Km value of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAL enzyme using fumaric acid as a substrate to be 21,234 mM [11].
The Vmax values were obtained from double reciprocal plots derived from substrate saturation curve (Figure 5, Table 1). The Vmax values were divided by protein amounts (nmole) to obtain the kcat values. The kcat values of LpAAL for L-aspartic acid and fumaric acid were estimated as 6.70 and 0.45 s−1, respectively. Moreover, the kcat values of MBP- LpAAL for L-aspartic acid and fumaric acid were estimated as 13.1 and 37.6 s−1, respectively (Table 2). In conclusion, both recombinant LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were undoubtedly functional AAL enzymes, and LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL enzyme activities were comparable.

3.6. Optimum Temperature and pH between PAL and TAL for LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL

Recently, Patel et al. reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAL protein can utilize phenylalanine as a substrate to yield cinnamic acid [11]. To investigate whether LpAAL/MBP-LpAAL proteins can also use L-phenylalanine or can further use L-tyrosine as a substrate, the optimum temperature of PAL and TAL activities were determined to between 30~50 °C. The optimal PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL protein were both at 40 °C (Figure 6A), similar to the optimal temperature of MBP-LpAAL (Figure 6B). However, the optimal temperatures of BoPAL4 protein for PAL (50 °C) and TAL activities (60 °C) were significantly higher than that of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins (Figure 6A,B).
Accordingly, the optimum pH for PAL and TAL activities were determined between 7.0 and 9.0, and the optimum pH for PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL protein were both 8.0 (Figure 6C), which is similar to the optimum pH for MBP-LpAAL protein (Figure 6D). In addition, the optimum pH of BoPAL4 protein for both PAL and TAL activities was 8.5, which was comparable with that of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins (Figure 6C,D). LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins exhibited better PAL/TAL relative activities at lower temperature and pH than that of BoPAL4 protein. Taken together, LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were able to produce cinnamic acid and p-coumaric acid through their PAL and TAL activities.

3.7. Kinetics Parameters for LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL with L-Phenylalanine and L-Tyrosine as Substrates

The Km of LpAAL protein with L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine as substrates were 4.43 and 1.17 mM, respectively, and the Km of MBP-LpAAL protein of L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine as substrates were 4.07 and 1.10 mM, respectively (Table 3). This was not similar to the result previously reported by Patel et al. with a Km value with L-phenylalanine of 1.7 mM for AAL [11]. In addition, the kcat of LpAAL enzyme with L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine were 0.45 and 0.02 s−1 respectively, and the kcat of MBP-LpAAL enzyme based on L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine were 0.84, 0.04, and s−1, respectively. By comparing with the kinetic parameters of BoPAL4 protein, LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were truly TAL and PAL enzymes in spite of showing lower catalytic capability than that of BoPAL4 protein (Table 3).

3.8. Comparison of Specific Activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL, and BoPAL4 Proteins

Besides enzyme kinetic parameters, the specific activities of AAL-F, AAL-R, PAL, and TAL were compared (Figure 7). The specific AAL-F activity of LpAAL protein was similar to that of MBP-LpAAL protein (Figure 7A). The specific AAL-F activities of both recombinant proteins were slightly higher (1.3-fold) than that of the specific AAL-R activities (Figure 7A). Accordingly, BoPAL4 protein was used as control to evaluate the PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins. The results showed that the PAL (Figure 7B) and TAL (Figure 7C) activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were about one-half and one-sixth of BoPAL4 protein. Although the PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were lower than that of BoPAL4, phenylalanine and tyrosine were bona fide substrates for both LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins.

4. Discussion

In this study, we proved that Lactobacillus paracasei aspartate ammonia-lyase, LpAAL, has broad substrate specificity and can be used to synthesize at least four products from four substrates. LpAAL protein is a multifunctional enzyme that is active under alkaline and mesophilic conditions, catalyzing the nonoxidative deamination of L-aspartic acid, fumaric acid, L-phenylalanine, and L-tyrosine to yield fumaric acid, L-aspartic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, and p-coumaric acid. Recombinant LpAAL expressed in E. coli was prone to form inclusion bodies, and MBP can significantly increase its solubility without affecting enzymatic activities. In Figure 7A, when the same protein amount of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL enzymes were subjected to the same reaction, there was no significant difference in the specific activity of both proteins. The lower mole ratio of MBP-LpAAL protein compared to LpAAL could catalyze substrates more efficiently, presumably due to MBP can stabilize LpAAL protein structure. Most of the AAL enzymes were highly specific for using aspartic acid as the substrate, but a few other substrate-catalyzing cases were also observed, including an AAL protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa with PAL activity [11,21]. In this study, LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL proteins were comprehensively elevated to have four enzyme activities, namely AAL-F, AAL-R, PAL, and TAL activities. To our knowledge, our result is the first finding that AAL enzyme can also function as TAL enzyme using a dual function PAL and TAL enzyme, BoPAL4, as the control protein. In the future, other putative aromatic substrates can be tested to figure out if they could be utilized as substrate by LpAAL protein.
Fumaric acid can be used as a medicine for skin diseases [27,28]; L-aspartic acid is used as a raw material for the production of aspartame [29]; trans-cinnamic acid has the protective effects in the nervous system [30] and cardiovascular system [31]; and p-coumaric acid exhibits antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects [32]. Immobilization of microbial AAL proteins has been applied for L-aspartate synthesis [21,26]. All four metabolites of LpAAL enzyme are applied in food, cosmetic, and medical industries. Therefore, LpAAL protein can also be immobilized on electrospun nanofibers to further characterize its recyclability, storage, and kinetic properties.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.-H.H., W.-C.Y., Y.-J.C., J.-Y.C. and L.-S.H.; Software, Y.-H.H. and J.-Y.C.; Validation, W.-C.Y. and L.-S.H.; Formal analysis, W.-C.Y. and L.-S.H.; Resources, W.-C.Y. and L.-S.H.; Data curation, L.-S.H.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.-H.H. and L.-S.H.; Supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, W.-C.Y. and L.-S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by research grants from the Taichung Veterans General Hospital and Tunghai University Joint Research Program (TCVGH-T1097806 to W.-C.Y. and L.-S.H.) and from the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 110-2313-B-029-001-MY3 to LSH).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained in the main article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AALaspartate ammonia-lyase
AAL-Faspartate ammonia-lyase forward reaction
AAL-Raspartate ammonia-lyase reverse reaction
bAALB: Bacillus sp. YM55-1 aspartate ammonia-lyase
BoPAL4Bambusa oldhamii phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 4
eAALe: E. coli aspartate ammonia-lyase
IPTGisopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
LBLuria-Bertani
LpAALLp: Lactobacillus paracasei aspartate ammonia-lyase
MBPmaltose-binding protein
pAALp: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 aspartate ammonia-lyase
PALphenylalanine ammonia-lyase
pfAALpf: Pseudomonas fluorescens R124 aspartate ammonia-lyase
PTALphenylalanine-tyrosine ammonia-lyase
TALtyrosine ammonia-lyase

References

  1. Kazuoka, T.; Masuda, Y.; Oikawa, T.; Soda, K. Thermostable aspartase from a marine psychrophile, Cytophaga sp. KUC-1: Molecular characterization and primary structure. J. Biochem. 2003, 133, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fibriansah, G.; Veetil, V.P.; Poelarends, G.J.; Thunnissen, A.M.W. Structural basis for the catalytic mechanism of aspartate ammonia lyase. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 6053–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karsten, W.E.; Hunsley, J.R.; Viola, R.E. Purification of aspartase and aspartokinase-homoserine dehydrogenase I from Escherichia coli by dye-ligand chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 147, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kawata, Y.; Tamura, K.; Yano, S.; Mizobata, T.; Nagai, J.; Esaki, N.; Soda, K.; Tokushige, M.; Yumoto, N. Purification and characterization of thermostable aspartase from Bacillus sp. YM55-1. Arch. Biochem. Biophy. 1999, 366, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nuiry, I.I.; Hermes, J.D.; Weiss, P.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Cook, P.F. Kinetic mechanism and location of rate-determining steps for aspartase from Hafnia alvei. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 5168–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X. Studies on the properties of mutants of aspartase from Escherichia coli Wa. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 864, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Singh, R.S.; Yadav, M. Single-step purification and characterization of recombinant aspartase of Aeromonas media NFB-5. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. de Villiers, M.; Veetil, V.P.; Raj, H.; de Villiers, J.; Poelarends, G.J. Catalytic mechanisms and biocatalytic applications of aspartate and methylaspartate ammonia lyases. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1618–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Veetil, V.P.; Raj, H.; Quax, W.J.; Janssen, D.B.; Poelarends, G.J. Site-directed mutagenesis, kinetic and inhibition studies of aspartate ammonia lyase from Bacillus sp. YM55-1. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 2994–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parmeggiani, F.; Weise, N.J.; Ahmed, S.T.; Turner, N.J. Synthetic and therapeutic applications of ammonia-lyases and aminomutases. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 73–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patel, A.T.; Akhani, R.C.; Patel, M.J.; Dedania, S.R.; Patel, D.H. Bioproduction of L-aspartic acid and cinnamic acid by L-aspartate ammonia lyase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 182, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hong, P.Y.; Huang, Y.H.; Lim, G.C.W.; Chen, Y.P.; Hsiao, C.J.; Chen, L.H.; Ciou, J.Y.; Hsieh, L.S. Production of trans-cinnamic acid by immobilization of the Bambusa oldhamii BoPAL1 and BoPAL2 phenylalanine ammonia-lyases on electrospun nanofibers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsieh, C.Y.; Huang, Y.H.; Yeh, H.H.; Hong, P.Y.; Hsiao, C.J.; Hsieh, L.S. Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and DOPA are bona fide substrates for Bambusa oldhamii BoPAL4. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cui, Y.; Qu, X. Genetic mechanisms of prebiotic carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria: Emphasis on Lacticaseibacillus casei and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei as flexible, diverse and outstanding prebiotic carbohydrate starters. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Azam, M.; Mohsin, M.; Ijaz, H.; Tulain, U.R.; Ashraf, M.A.; Fayyaz, A.; Kamran, Q. Lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented Asian foods. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 1803–1804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Hill, D.; Sugrue, I.; Tobin, C.; Hill, C.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. The Lactobacillus casei group: History and health related applications. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Rollan, G.C.; Manca de Nadra, M.C.; Pesce de Ruiz Holgado, A.A.; Oliver, G. Aspartate metabolism in Lactibacillus murinus CNRS 313. I. Aspartase. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1985, 31, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fernández, M.; Zúñiga, M. Amino acid catabolic pathways of lactic acid bacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbio1. 2006, 32, 155–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hsiao, C.J.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Hsieh, L.S. Cloning and characterization of the Bambusa oldhamii BoMDH-encoded malate dehydrogenase. Protein Expr. Purif. 2020, 174, 105665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsu, W.H.; Huang, Y.H.; Chen, P.R.; Hsieh, L.S. NLIP and HAD-like domains of Pah1 and Lipin 1 phosphatidate phosphatases are essential for their catalytic activities. Molecules 2021, 26, 5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Csuka, P.; Molnár, Z.; Tóth, V.; Imarah, A.O.; Balogh-Weiser, D.; Vértessy, B.G.; Poppe, L. Immobilization of the aspartate ammonia-lyase from Pseudomonas fluorescens R124 on magnetic nanoparticles: Characterization and kinetics. ChemBioChem 2022, 23, e202100708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ida, N.; Tokushige, M. L-Aspartate-induced activation of aspartase. J. Biochem. 1985, 98, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.; Liu, Y. A QM/MM study of the catalytic mechanism of aspartate ammonia lyase. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2014, 51, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eze, S.O.O.; Ghulam, J.; Husain, A.; Nozaki, T. Molecular cloning and characterization of aspartate ammonia-lyase from Entamoeba histolytica. Nigerian J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, L.J.; Kong, X.D.; Zhang, H.Y.; Wang, X.P.; Zhang, J. Enhancement of the activity of L-aspartase from Escherichia coli W by directed evolution. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Commun. 2000, 276, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cárdenas-Fernández, M.; López, C.; Alvaro, G.; López-Santín, J. Immobilized L-aspartate ammonia-lyase from Bacillus sp. YM55-1 as biocatalyst for highly concentrated L-aspartate synthesis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 35, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mrowietz, U.; Christophers, E.; Altmeyer, P. Treatment of psoriasis with fumaric acid esters: Results of a prospective multicentre study. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 138, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roa Engel, C.A.; Straathof, A.J.; Zijlmans, T.W.; van Gulik, W.M.; van der Wielen, L.A. Fumaric acid production by fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 78, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Werpy, T.; Petersen, G. Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass: Volume I-Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas (No. DOE/GO-102004-1992); National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Prorok, T.; Jana, M.; Patel, D.; Pahan, K. Cinnamic acid protects the nigrostriatum in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, F.; Li, H.; Sun, J.; Wang, S. Protective effects of cinnamic acid and cinnamic aldehyde on isoproterenol-induced acute myocardial ischemia in rats. J. Eethnopharmacol. 2013, 150, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Xu, W.; Xu, W. Production of trans-cinnamic and p-coumaric acids in engineered E. coli. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fermentation 09 00049 g001 550
Figure 1. The enzyme reactions catalyzed by the LpAAL protein. AAL-F: aspartate ammonia-lyase forward reaction; AAL-R: aspartate ammonia-lyase reverse reaction; PAL: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TAL: tyrosine ammonia-lyase.
Figure 1. The enzyme reactions catalyzed by the LpAAL protein. AAL-F: aspartate ammonia-lyase forward reaction; AAL-R: aspartate ammonia-lyase reverse reaction; PAL: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TAL: tyrosine ammonia-lyase.
Fermentation 09 00049 g001
Fermentation 09 00049 g002 550
Figure 2. Preparation of recombinant MBP-LpAAL and LpAAL proteins. (A) LpAAL protein and MBP-LpAAL fusion protein were expressed in Escherichia coli. (B) Recombinant proteins were purified using Ni-NTA affinity column and separated using 10% SDS–PAGE, and then stained with Coomassie Blue dye. Mr, molecular weight SDS–PAGE marker; lane 1, MBP-LpAAL; lane 2, LpAAL. MBP: maltose-binding protein.
Figure 2. Preparation of recombinant MBP-LpAAL and LpAAL proteins. (A) LpAAL protein and MBP-LpAAL fusion protein were expressed in Escherichia coli. (B) Recombinant proteins were purified using Ni-NTA affinity column and separated using 10% SDS–PAGE, and then stained with Coomassie Blue dye. Mr, molecular weight SDS–PAGE marker; lane 1, MBP-LpAAL; lane 2, LpAAL. MBP: maltose-binding protein.
Fermentation 09 00049 g002
Fermentation 09 00049 g003 550
Figure 3. Optimum reaction temperature of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL (A) and MBP-LpAAL (B) enzymes. Activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 50 °C. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Figure 3. Optimum reaction temperature of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL (A) and MBP-LpAAL (B) enzymes. Activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 50 °C. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Fermentation 09 00049 g003
Fermentation 09 00049 g004 550
Figure 4. Optimum reaction pH of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL (A) and MBP-LpAAL (B) enzymes. Activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Figure 4. Optimum reaction pH of AAL-F and AAL-R activities of LpAAL (A) and MBP-LpAAL (B) enzymes. Activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Fermentation 09 00049 g004
Fermentation 09 00049 g005 550
Figure 5. Kinetic parameters of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL with L-aspartic acid and fumaric acid as substrate. (A), to determine LpAAL kinetic parameters using L-aspartic acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (B), to determine MBP-LpAAL kinetic parameters using L-aspartic acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (C), to determine LpAAL kinetic parameters using fumaric acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (D), to determine MBP-LpAAL kinetic parameters using fumaric acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Figure 5. Kinetic parameters of LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL with L-aspartic acid and fumaric acid as substrate. (A), to determine LpAAL kinetic parameters using L-aspartic acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (B), to determine MBP-LpAAL kinetic parameters using L-aspartic acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (C), to determine LpAAL kinetic parameters using fumaric acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. (D), to determine MBP-LpAAL kinetic parameters using fumaric acid as substrate, substrate saturation curve. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Fermentation 09 00049 g005
Fermentation 09 00049 g006a 550Fermentation 09 00049 g006b 550
Figure 6. Optimum reaction temperature and pH of PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 enzymes. (A) PAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 60 °C. (B) TAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 60 °C. (C) PAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. (D) TAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Figure 6. Optimum reaction temperature and pH of PAL and TAL activities of LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 enzymes. (A) PAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 60 °C. (B) TAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of temperatures from 30 to 60 °C. (C) PAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. (D) TAL activities were measured under standard assay conditions in a range of pH from 7.0 to 9.0. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars). The average of maximum activity was normalized as 100%.
Fermentation 09 00049 g006aFermentation 09 00049 g006b
Fermentation 09 00049 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of specific activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL, and BoPAL4. (A) Specific AAL-F and AAL-R activities in LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL were measured under standard assay condition. (B) Specific PAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 were measured under standard assay condition. (C) Specific TAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 were measured under standard assay condition. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars).
Figure 7. Comparison of specific activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL, and BoPAL4. (A) Specific AAL-F and AAL-R activities in LpAAL and MBP-LpAAL were measured under standard assay condition. (B) Specific PAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 were measured under standard assay condition. (C) Specific TAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL and BoPAL4 were measured under standard assay condition. All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as average ± standard deviation (S.D., error bars).
Fermentation 09 00049 g007
Table
Table 1. Expression plasmids used for recombinant proteins expressions in Escherichia coli.
Table 1. Expression plasmids used for recombinant proteins expressions in Escherichia coli.
PlasmidsRelevant CharacteristicsSource/Reference
pET28aE. coli expression vector with N-terminal His6-tag fusionInvitrogen
pET28a-LpAALLpAAL coding sequence inserted into pET28bThis study
pMAL-c2xE. coli expression vector with N-terminal MBP fusionNew England Biolab
pMAL-LpAALLpAAL coding sequence inserted into pMAL-c2xThis study
pTrcHis-BoPAL4BoPAL4 coding sequence inserted into pTrcHisA [13]
Table
Table 2. Comparison of biochemical properties and kinetic parameters of AAL activities in various AAL proteins.
Table 2. Comparison of biochemical properties and kinetic parameters of AAL activities in various AAL proteins.
EnzymeSubstrateSpecific Activity
(U/mg)		Optimum
pH		Optimum Temp (°C)Vmax
(nmole/min)		kcat
(s−1)		Km
(mM)		kcat / Km
(s−1 mM)		Ref.
LpAALL-Asp7.7 × 1078.040936.75.701.18This study
fumaric acid6.098.0402570.458.500.05
MBP-LpAALL-Asp8.3 × 1078.5459713.15.205.20This study
fumaric acid5.738.03526737.648.508.5
pAAL 1L-Asp----------------4.913 × 10−4----[11]
BAAL 2L-Asp------------287 (mM/h)----213----[26]
pfAAL 3L-Asp----8.8--------1305.125[21]
1 pAAL: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1; 2 BAAL: Bacillus sp. YM55-1; 3 pfAAL: Pseudomonas fluorescens R124.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of biochemical properties and kinetic parameters of PAL and TAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL, and BoPAL4 proteins.
Table 3. Comparison of biochemical properties and kinetic parameters of PAL and TAL activities in LpAAL, MBP-LpAAL, and BoPAL4 proteins.
ProteinsSubstrateOptimum pHOptimum Temp (°C)kcat (s−1)Km (mM)Ref.
LpAALL-Phe8.0400.454.43This study
L-Tyr8.0400.021.17
MBP-LpAALL-Phe8.0400.844.07This study
L-Tyr8.5400.041.10
BoPAL4L-Phe9.0501.142.10[13]
L-Tyr8.5600.180.10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.-H.; You, W.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Ciou, J.-Y.; Hsieh, L.-S. Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase. Fermentation 2023, 9, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010049

AMA Style

Huang Y-H, You W-C, Chen Y-J, Ciou J-Y, Hsieh L-S. Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase. Fermentation. 2023; 9(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yi-Hao, Weir-Chiang You, Yung-Ju Chen, Jhih-Ying Ciou, and Lu-Sheng Hsieh. 2023. "Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase" Fermentation 9, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010049

APA Style

Huang, Y. -H., You, W. -C., Chen, Y. -J., Ciou, J. -Y., & Hsieh, L. -S. (2023). Insight into the Substrate Specificity of Lactobacillus paracasei Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase. Fermentation, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9010049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop