Previous Article in Journal
Potential Applicability of Air-Cooled Ladle Furnace Slag Fine Aggregate in Concrete Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Technical Recyclability and Carbon Footprint of Packaging for Butter, Yogurt, and Spreads

1
Institute of Packaging and Resource Management, Department Applied Life Sciences, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, 1100 Vienna, Austria
2
Circular Analytics TK GmbH, 1010 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recycling 2025, 10(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020031
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 19 February 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 21 February 2025

Abstract

The adoption of the PPWR by the Council of the European Union (EU/2025/40) in 2025 intensifies the regulatory pressure on packaging manufacturers and food producers. This necessitates their adaptation of packaging to the new standards and selection of materials by various sustainability criteria and minimum standards. The legal text places particular emphasis on recyclability and the carbon footprint. The dairy industry holds significant economic importance in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland); this study therefore analyzed and compared the recyclability and carbon footprint of selected product categories and diverse packaging options for butter, yogurt, spreads, curd cheese, and cottage cheese. This study found large differences within the product categories, and also between the assessed countries, due to differing waste management systems (collection, sorting, and recycling) and waste streams. A key finding is the substantial discrepancy in glass packaging, which significantly exceeds the emission values of other packaging systems. In terms of recyclability, glass packaging performs well due to the effectiveness of the recycling systems regarding the future effective PPWR. However, significant variations in recyclability were observed between Germany and Austria for tray and cup materials made of PP and PS. Notably, there is a preference for packaging systems without a cardboard sleeve over those with one. This study provides critical insights into the environmental performance of packaging materials in the dairy sector. It highlights the challenges posed by regulatory changes and the urgent need for region-specific strategies. By identifying key areas for improvement in packaging design and waste management, this work lays the foundation for achieving compliance with the PPWR and advancing the transition toward a circular economy in the DACH region.
Keywords: recyclability; carbon footprint; packaging; yogurt; butter; spread recyclability; carbon footprint; packaging; yogurt; butter; spread

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klein, M.; Neumair, C.; Tacker, M.; Apprich, S. Technical Recyclability and Carbon Footprint of Packaging for Butter, Yogurt, and Spreads. Recycling 2025, 10, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020031

AMA Style

Klein M, Neumair C, Tacker M, Apprich S. Technical Recyclability and Carbon Footprint of Packaging for Butter, Yogurt, and Spreads. Recycling. 2025; 10(2):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klein, Michelle, Charlotte Neumair, Manfred Tacker, and Silvia Apprich. 2025. "Technical Recyclability and Carbon Footprint of Packaging for Butter, Yogurt, and Spreads" Recycling 10, no. 2: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020031

APA Style

Klein, M., Neumair, C., Tacker, M., & Apprich, S. (2025). Technical Recyclability and Carbon Footprint of Packaging for Butter, Yogurt, and Spreads. Recycling, 10(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020031

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop