Safety

18 pages, 695 KB

Open AccessArticle

Emergency Management in Coal Mining: Developing a Capability-Based Model in Indonesia

by Ajeng Puspitaning Pramayu, Fatma Lestari, Dadan Erwandi and Besral Besral

Safety 2025, 11(4), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040096 (registering DOI) - 4 Oct 2025

The coal mining sector in Indonesia faces a high level of risk of disasters; however, to date, there is no specific evaluation framework to measure Emergency Management Capability. This research aims to develop a conceptual model of EMC that applies to the context of the coal mining industry. Using an exploratory qualitative approach, this study employed regulatory analysis and in-depth interviews, which were then thematically analyzed using the NVivo application. The results identified four challenges to EMC implementation, namely the absence of a minimum index standard for assessment, policy and implementation gaps, illegal mining activities, and risk dynamics. In response to these challenges, three strategic approaches were proposed: utilizing the InaRISK platform, adapting the IKD model, and developing standardized EMC instruments. Furthermore, this research formulates seven main components in the mining sector EMC framework, namely (1) risk and threat identification, (2) physical capacity, (3) human resource capacity, (4) prevention, (5) emergency response capability, (6) evaluation and improvement, and (7) recovery and restoration. This framework is expected to serve as a reference for evaluating the preparedness of mining organizations in a systematic, adaptive, and integrated manner within the national safety management system. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 497 KB

Open AccessArticle

Factor-Based Analysis of Certification Validity in Engineering Safety

by Samat Baigereyev, Zhadyra Konurbayeva, Monika Kulisz, Saule Rakhmetullina and Assiya Mashekenova

Safety 2025, 11(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040095 - 2 Oct 2025

Abstract

Professional certification of engineers plays a crucial role in verifying competencies and ensuring the safety and quality of engineering outputs. However, most existing certification systems assign fixed validity periods (e.g., 3–5 years) without considering individual engineer characteristics or the intensity of technological progress in specific fields. This study examines the key factors influencing the optimal validity period of engineering certifications and proposes it as a measurable indicator to support safety in engineering practice. A new model is introduced that integrates expert judgment, fuzzy set theory, and bibliometric analysis of Q1/Q2 Scopus-indexed publications. The model incorporates three main factors: competence level, professional experience, and the technological intensity of the discipline. A case study from the engineering certification system of Kazakhstan demonstrates the model’s practical applicability. Certification bodies, policymakers, and engineering organizations can use these findings to establish more flexible certification validity periods, thereby ensuring timely reassessment of competencies and reducing safety risks. For example, for mechanical engineers, the optimal validity period is 3 years rather than the statutory 5 years; in other words, the model recommends a 40% reduction in certification validity. This reduction reflects the combined effects of competency level, professional experience, and technology intensity on certification renewal schedules. Overall, the proposed factorial approach supports a more personalized and safety-oriented certification process and offers insights into improving national qualification systems. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 760 KB

Open AccessArticle

Expanding the Fine-Kinney Methodology Using Fuzzy Logic: A Case Study in an Energy Linemen Workshop

by Chris Mitrakas, Alexandros Xanthopoulos and Dimitrios Koulouriotis

Safety 2025, 11(4), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040094 - 2 Oct 2025

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness and limitations of the traditional Fine-Kinney method for occupational risk assessment, emphasizing its shortcomings in addressing complex and dynamic work environments. To overcome these challenges, two advanced methodologies, Fine-Kinney10 (FK10) and Fuzzy Fine-Kinney10 (FFK10), are introduced. The FK10 employs a symmetric scaling system (1–10) for probability, frequency, and severity indicators, providing a more balanced quantification of risks. Meanwhile, FFK10 incorporates fuzzy logic to handle uncertainty and subjectivity in risk assessment, significantly enhancing the sensitivity and accuracy of risk evaluation. These methodologies were applied to a linemen workshop in an energy production and distribution company, analyzing various types of accidents such as falls from heights, exposure to electric currents, slips on surfaces, and more. The applications highlighted the practical benefits of these methods in effectively assessing and mitigating risks. A significant finding includes the identification of risks related to falls from heights of <2.5 m (SH1) and road traffic accidents (SH6), where all three methods yielded different verbal outcomes. Compared to the traditional Fine-Kinney method, FK10 and FFK10 demonstrated superior ability in distinguishing risk levels and guiding targeted safety measures. The study underscores that FK10 and FFK10 represent significant advancements in occupational risk management, offering robust frameworks adaptable across various industries. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 1420 KB

Open AccessArticle

Identifying a Framework for Implementing Vision Zero Approach to Road Safety in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Perspective

by Mahfooz Ulhaq Bajwa, Wafaa Saleh and Grigorios Fountas

Safety 2025, 11(4), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety11040093 - 2 Oct 2025

Abstract

Road traffic fatalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are continuing to rise, posing significant socio-economic and public health challenges. To prevent these road deaths and avoid the corresponding costs, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended implementing the vision zero approach to road safety. Vision Zero aims to eliminate road deaths and reduce serious injuries. It has been adopted by many developed countries, however LMICs have faced difficulties implementing this approach due to a lack of guidance. This study aims to develop a framework for implementing vision zero in LMICs by examining the processes in India and Sweden. A qualitative research approach with a multiple-case study design was utilized, selecting 16 participants through purposive and snowball sampling. Data was collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Grounded Theory method based on Strauss and Corbin’s approach. The study identified five core implementation steps such as agenda setting, approval, planning, monitoring and evaluation, and continuous improvement. Also, a set of influencing conditions such as preconditions, objectives, strategies, intervening factors and contextual conditions were identified. Furthermore, 38 implementation proposals were suggested in the framework to guide policymakers. The proposed framework provides a road map for LMICs that is intended to act as a guide for policymakers and road safety practitioners to enhance road safety performance in LMICs. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Traffic Safety Culture)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Safety, Volume 11, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 4 articles

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI