Next Article in Journal
How to Sabbatical Successfully (and Reinvigorate Your Career)?
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Quality of Maternity Care through the Introduction of Professional Midwives and Mentoring in Selected Sub-District Hospitals in Bangladesh: A Mixed Method Study Protocol
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Practical Peptide Synthesis Workflow Using Amino-Li-Resin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0

by
Beatriz G. de la Torre
1,* and
Fernando Albericio
2,3,*
1
KRISP, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
2
School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
3
CIBER-BBN, Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Methods Protoc. 2022, 5(6), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps5060085
Submission received: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 16 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0)
According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are two kinds of drugs, namely New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and Biologics. The former are well-characterized molecules or ions responsible for the physiological or pharmacological action of the drug substance [1]. NCEs are associated with the simple chemical concept of “pure substance”. In contrast, Biologics are generally large, complex molecules. They are produced by biotechnology and are often more difficult to characterize than NCEs [2].
Peptides and Oligonucleotides (TIDES), although very often large and complex molecules, are chemically produced and belong to the NCE class. Due to their inherent complexity, only a few decades ago the idea of having a peptide such as the recently approved tirzepatide (MounjaroTM) with a backbone of 39 amino acids and a pending branch formed by four moieties produced at a multi Kg scale was unimaginable [3]. Similarly, inclisiran (LeqvioTM), which was approved in 2021, is a double-stranded siRNA—with 21 and 23 ribonucleosides for the sense and antisense strands, respectively. In addition, the sense strand is linked to a short dendrimer bearing N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) [4].
The entry of large and complex TIDES-based drugs into the market has been possible thanks to a simple discovery, namely solid-phase synthesis. During these days, we are celebrating the 60th anniversary of the first public announcement of the Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis (SPPS) technique at the Federation Meeting held in Atlantic City in 1962 by the Nobel Laureate R. Bruce Merrifield. The first publication appeared a year after this event [5]. Just two years later, Letsinger published the application of Merrifield’s methodology to oligonucleotide synthesis [6] (SPPS for peptides and SPOS for oligonucleotides), and so began the era of the chemical synthesis of complex biomolecules using the solid-phase approach. Without this technique, the current panorama of TIDES in the pharmaceutical industry would be very different.
Merrifield’s idea was very simple: growing the peptide sequence from the C- to the N-terminal using a functionalized insoluble polymer (resin, solid support) as a permanent protecting group of the C-carboxylic acid. Thus, the rest of the amino acids are sequentially incorporated bearing a temporal protecting group for the α-amino function, which is removed after each step, and a permanent protecting group for the side chains if necessary. These protecting groups are removed at the end of the stepwise elongation at the same time as the peptide is released from the solid support. The use of the solid protecting group allows the use of an excess of reagents, thereby facilitating excellent yields [7].
The strategy had several critics and skeptics in the beginning, mainly established peptide chemists [8]. However, with time, SPPS has become the method of choice for the preparation of peptides on an mg scale in a research mode and on a multiKg scale as part of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients [9,10].
According to the excellent database PepTherDia, promoted by D’Aloisio et al., currently, there are 113 peptides on the market [11,12].
Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 shows approvals by the FDA between 1 January 2016, and 30 September 2022, of peptide-based therapeutic/diagnostic drugs (20), radioactive peptide-based thera-/dia-gnostic agents (6), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), where the drug (cytotoxic) is a peptide (4), respectively. In total, 30 therapeutic/diagnostic peptide-based drugs have been approved over these years. At this point, it is important to highlight that the “definition” of peptide associated with Table 1 and Table 2 is somewhat wider than that used in PepTherDia. The peptides shown in Table 1 and Table 2 are formed by at least two amino acids, which are bound, preferably by a peptide bond.
This scientific “miracle” started in the Merrifield laboratory at Rockefeller University. However, keeping the same original concept, it has been possible to optimize both the synthesis and purification steps, allowing the preparation of peptide-based APIs on a multiKg scale to feed the pharmaceutical industry. This achievement has been possible thanks to the contribution of a very large number of colleagues, working both in academia and industry. Many of these chemical advances have been published in scientific journals, but they are scattered throughout the vast network of scientific information.
This Special Issue of Materials and Protocols, entitled “Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0”, seeks to bring together the state of the art in SPPS in a single publication.
“Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0” will cover all the practical aspects of peptide synthesis, purification, and characterization: resins, protecting groups, coupling agents, cleavage cocktails and their scavengers, solvents for synthesis and purification, synthesis of linear, cyclic, stapled, branched peptides, with post-translational modifications, peptide-drug conjugates, and all purification and analysis methods. This issue will pay particular attention to the great challenge faced by chemists, which is no other than maintaining the quality of synthesized products while making processes greener, thus contributing to a more sustainable world.
Hopefully, the peptide scientific community will be able to share in this Special Issue with the rest of those little tricks that facilitate the synthesis/production of the target peptide in excellent yields and purity, and that this knowledge benefits a wider community.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, B.G.d.l.T. and F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work performed by the authors laboratory is funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Small Business Assistance: Frequently Asked Questions for New Drug Product Exclusivity. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/cder-small-business-industry-assistance-sbia/small-business-assistance-frequently-asked-questions-new-drug-product-exclusivity (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  2. What Are “Biologics” Questions and Answers. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-biologics-evaluation-and-research-cber/what-are-biologics-questions-and-answers (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  3. Frederick, M.O.; Boyse, R.A.; Braden, M.B.; Calvin, J.R.; Campbell, B.M.; Changi, S.M.; Coffin, S.R.; Condon, C.; Gowran, O.; Groh, J.M.; et al. Kilogram-Scale GMP Manufacture of Tirzepatide Using a Hybrid SPPS/LPPS Approach with Continuous Manufacturing. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2021, 25, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lamb, Y.N. Inclisiran: First Approval. Drugs 2021, 81, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Merrifield, R.B. Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis. I. The Synthesis of a Tetrapeptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Letsinger, R.L.; Mahadevan, V. Stepwise synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides on an insoluble polymer support. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5319–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Merrifield, R.B. Solid Phase Synthesis (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. 1985, 24, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marshall, G.R. The Early Years—Across the Bench From Bruce (1963–1966). Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2008, 90, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bruckdorfer, T.; Marder, O.; Albericio, F. From production of peptides in milligram amounts for research to multi-tons quantities for drugs of the future. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2004, 5, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zompra, A.A.; Galanis, A.S.; Werbitzky, O.; Albericio, F. Preparation of Peptides as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API). Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. D’Aloisio, V.; Dognini, P.; Hutcheon, G.A.; Coxon, G.A. PepTherDia: Database and structural composition analysis of approved peptide therapeutics and diagnostics. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 1409–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Available online: http://peptherdia.herokuapp.com/list (accessed on 27 September 2022).
  13. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2021. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2022, 27, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2020. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2021, 26, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2019. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2020, 25, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2018. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2019, 24, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2017. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2018, 23, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2016. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2017, 22, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/new-drugs-fda-cders-new-molecular-entities-and-new-therapeutic-biological-products/novel-drug-approvals-2022 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
Table 1. Peptide-based drug/diagnostic approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Table 1. Peptide-based drug/diagnostic approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Active Ingredient aTrade Name aIndicationYear of Approval
Lixisenatide AdlyxinTMType 2 diabetes2016
Abaloparatide TymlosTMOsteoporosis2017
Angiotensin II GiaprezaTMControl of blood pressure2017
Etelcalcetide ParsabivTMHyperparathyroidism2017
MacimorelinMacrilenTMAdult growth hormone deficiency2017
Plecanatide TrulanceTMChronic idiopathic constipation2017
Semaglutide OzempicTMType 2 diabetes 2017
AfamelanotideScenesseTMTo prevent skin damage and pain after exposure to the sun.2019
Bremelanotide VyleesiTMHypoactive sexual desire in premenopausal women 2019
Setmelanotide ImcivreeTMObesity and hunger2020
DasiglucagonZegalogueTMHypoglycemia in diabetes 2021
DifelikefalinKorsuvaTMPruritus2021
Melphalan flufenamidePepaxtoTMMultiple myeloma2021
OdevixibatBylvayTMPruritus2021
PegcetacoplanEmpaveliTMParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria2021
VoclosporinLupkynisTMLupus nephritis2021
VosoritideVoxzogoTMAchondroplasia (Dwarfism)2021
GadopiclenolElucirem™ Diagnostic of lesions in the central nervous system2022
TerlipressinTerlivazTMLow blood pressure2022
TirzepatideMounjaroTMType 2 diabetes and obesity2022
a Trade name used in the USA.
Table 2. Radioactive peptide-based thera-/dia-gnostic agents approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Table 2. Radioactive peptide-based thera-/dia-gnostic agents approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Active Ingredient aTrade Name aIndicationYear of Approval
Lutetium 177 DOTA-TATELutatheraTMTheragnostic for neuroendocrine tumors2018
Gallium 68 DOTA-TOC Diagnostic for tumors2019
Copper 64 dotatate DetectnetTMDiagnostic for neuroendocrine tumors2020
Gallium 68 PSMA-1 Diagnostic for prostate cancer2020
Piflufolastat F-18PylarifyTMDiagnostic for prostate cancer2021
Lutetium 177 vipivotide tetraxetanPluvictoTMTheragnostic for prostate cancer2022
a Trade name used in the USA.
Table 3. ADCs approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 in which the drug is a peptide [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Table 3. ADCs approved by the FDA between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2022 in which the drug is a peptide [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Active Ingredient aTrade Name aIndicationYear of Approval
Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv bPadcevTMCancers expressing Nectin-42019
Polatuzumab vedotin-piiq bPolivyTMDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma2019
Belantamab mafodotin-blmBlenrepTMMultiple myeloma2020
Tisotumab vedotin-tftv bTivdak TMCervical cancer2021
a Trade name used in the USA; b The linker contains a peptide.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de la Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0. Methods Protoc. 2022, 5, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps5060085

AMA Style

de la Torre BG, Albericio F. Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0. Methods and Protocols. 2022; 5(6):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps5060085

Chicago/Turabian Style

de la Torre, Beatriz G., and Fernando Albericio. 2022. "Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0" Methods and Protocols 5, no. 6: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps5060085

APA Style

de la Torre, B. G., & Albericio, F. (2022). Practical Protocols for Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis 4.0. Methods and Protocols, 5(6), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps5060085

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop