Next Article in Journal
Protocol Study: Resistance Training Program, Nutritional, Sleep, and Screen Use Recommendations in Schoolchildren from Educational Centers in the Extreme South of Chile
Previous Article in Journal
Real-Time Monitoring of Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization Using Acridine Orange
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Protocol

Novel Protocol for the Preparation of Porcine Bone Marrow Primary Cell Culture for African Swine Fever Virus Isolation

FGBI Federal Centre for Animal Health, 600901 Vladimir, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Methods Protoc. 2023, 6(5), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050073
Submission received: 2 July 2023 / Revised: 11 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Cellular Biology)

Abstract

:
Isolation of African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a critical step towards the identification, titration, characterization, and even modification of the virus. Therefore, it is important to identify a suitable cell line that supports the efficient replication of ASFV for these purposes. This should be achieved even when starting with a low virus load, as in the case of isolating the virus from field samples. This article presents a detailed protocol on the preparation of porcine bone marrow primary (PBMP) cell culture, which has a high sensitivity towards ASFV, resulting in high viral yields with a minimal risk of bacterial contamination.

1. Introduction

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the only member of the Asfarviridae family genus Asfivirus [1]. It is the causative agent of ASF disease, a highly contagious hemorrhagic fever of domestic pigs and wild boars, which has a mortality rate of up to 100% [2]. The virus has a double-stranded DNA genome around 170–197 kilo-base pair (kbp) in length, encoding roughly 160 ORF [3]. Laboratory confirmation of the presence of the virus in a sample (usually whole blood, spleen, or bone marrow) is based on a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in order to detect selected regions of the viral genome, followed by virus isolation (VI) in cell culture, according to the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) recommendations [4].
Due to the observed phenomenon of “hemadsorption” represented by the accumulation of red blood cells (RBCs) at the surface of infected cells, the first biological models for ASF virus isolation were cell cultures of the mononuclear-macrophage series (blood leukocytes and bone marrow macrophages of pigs) [5,6,7,8]. Porcine kidney (PK) continuous cell lines (PK2a, PK-15, PK-13, and IB-RS-2) and primary cultures required additional ASF virus adaptation by serial passaging (from 8 to 73 passages) to achieve a high level of viral load and the appearance of a cytopathic effect (CPE) [7,8,9,10,11]. Monolayer cultures of porcine kidney cells as well as chicken embryo fibroblasts and BHK-21 were used to study the morphology and the replication of the ASF virus by plaque and electron microscopy methods, but they were not suitable for the primary isolation and identification of field isolates [12,13,14,15,16]. Adaptation of the virulent ASF virus of genotype I (for example, Lisbon 60, BA71, and others) to green monkey kidney cell lines Vero and CV-1 led to the appearance of attenuated strains used in the production of antigens and sera for the manufacturing of diagnostic biological products [17,18,19,20,21]. A comparative analysis of the sensitivity of 16 different cell cultures to the ASF virus was performed, before showing the ability of ASFV to replicate in cells derived from Sus scrofa (alveolar macrophages), green monkey (Vero, CV2, COS-1), and rhesus monkey (LLCMK2) [22]. While in cell cultures derived from hamster (BHK-21, CHO), human (HeLa, Sh-SY5Y), mouse (A 9, 3T6, NP3, L 929), dog (MDCK), and fall armyworm (Sf9), the virus did not replicate [22]. Hurtado et al. showed the sensitivity of COS-1 cells obtained by immortalizing CV-1 with the SV40 virus to both virulent strains of the ASF virus (E70, Malawi 82, Lisbon 60, and others) and attenuated ones (ΔEP153R, NHV, BA71V, and others) [23]. Masujin et al. obtained a continuous cell culture of porcine renal macrophages (IPKM) sensitive to virulent strains of the ASF virus (Armenia07, Kenya05/Tk-1, and Espana75) [24].
The majority of laboratories and research institutes investigating and performing routine diagnostics on ASFV employ three main cell culture lines. These are primary macrophage cultures prepared from fresh pig blood (PBMC), primary alveolar macrophage cultures (PAMC), and continuous cell culture MA-104 [4,25,26,27]. PBMC and PAMC are the most sensitive to the virus infection and replication since they are derived from the natural host, but they are time-consuming to prepare and they often result in a low cell yield, and researchers also frequently report fungal contamination when preparing PAMC. The MA-104 cell culture has been tested using several ASFV isolates, but they are not suitable for laboratory diagnosis when the virus load is low and requires sensitive original host cells. Additionally, the successful isolation of viruses belonging to new genotypes containing new genomic mutations or even novel recombinants (for example, the novel genotype I and II recombinants recently described in China) has not been tested in continuous cell lines [28].
In this paper, we describe a step-by-step procedure for the preparation of porcine bone marrow primary (PBMP) cell culture that has a high yield and high sensitivity as well as a low risk of contamination.

2. Equipment

  • Class II biological safety cabinet (model: Streamline—E Series, catalog number: SC2-E).
  • Humidified 37 ± 2 °C, 5 ± 1% CO2 incubator (model: S-Bt Smart Bio Term, catalog number: BS-010425-A01).
  • −70 °C freezer (Sanyo MDF-U53V, catalog number: 9782).
  • −20 °C freezer (model: LG, catalog number: GA-B419SQQL).
  • Refrigerator, 4 °C, with an acceptable range of 2 °C to 8 °C (model: LG, catalog number: GA-B419SQQL).
  • Water bath, 37 °C (model: WB-4MS Stirred water bath, BioSan, catalog number: BS-010406-AAA).
  • Portable Pipettor (Dragon Laboratory Instruments Limited, Beijing, China, Levo plus, catalog number: 710932).
  • Micropipettors: Single channel, 1–10 µL, 2–20 µL, 50–200 µL, 100–1000 µL (Eppendorf catalog numbers: Q11390H, K12770H, Q24196H, L18745H).
  • Micropipettors: Multi-channel, 0.5–10 µL, 5–50 µL, 50–300 µL (BTLab systems, Saint Louis, USA, Lab System, catalog numbers: N87539, D23745, E21512).
  • Multi-channel for larger volumes (RaininTM Pipet-Life XLS, L-1200, 100–1200 µL, catalog number: 17014497).
  • Inverted Microscope (Euromex Microscopen, Arnhem, Netherlands, model: Olympus Euromex Oxion, catalog number: SKU: EOX.2053-PLPH).
  • Tabletop Centrifuge (HERMLE Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany, model: HERMLE Z 306, catalog number: 310.00 v01).
  • Shaker incubator (BioSan, Riga, Latvia, model: Biosan ES-20, catalog number: BS-010135-AAA).
  • Electronic balance (model: OHAUS Navigator NV212, catalog number: 83033081).
  • Countess™ automatic cell counter.

3. Materials and Reagents

  • Pipette tips: 10 μL, 20 μL, 200 μL, 1000 μL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, catalog numbers: 2140-05, 72830-440, 72830-044, 72830-042).
  • Sterile serological pipettes: 1 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL, 25 mL, 50 mL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog numbers: 14672-918, 14672-920, 4101, 14672-900, 53384-451).
  • Conical tubes: 15 and 50 mL (Corning, AZ, USA, Falcon®, catalog numbers: 353110 and 352098)
  • T-75 flask (Corning, catalog number: 430641U).
  • T-25 flask (Corning, catalog number: 430825).
  • T-225 flask (Corning, catalog number: 431082).
  • Millex-HV Syringe Filter Unit, 0.45 µm, PVDF, 33 mm, gamma sterilized (Catalog number: SLHV033RS).
  • Absorbent paper (Kimtech Pure CL4, Kimberly-Clark Professional, GA, USA, catalog number: 7646).
  • Reservoirs (Costar Reagent Reservoir, Corning®, catalog number: 29442-474).
  • TrypLE™ Express Enzyme (1X), no phenol red (Thermofisher, catalog number: 12604-013).
  • EZFlow® cell strainers (catalog number 410-0002-OEM).
  • Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) (Thermofisher, catalog number: 11095-080).
  • ASFV field strain: For example an ASFV-Arm07 field strain (Arm07).
  • Trypan blue solution, 0.4% (Thermofisher scientific, catalog number: 15250061).
  • Gentamicin 40mg/ml Solution (Wockhardt UK Ltd. Wrexham, UK, catalog number: J01GB03).
  • Penicillin G sodium salt (Sigma 1000000 Units, Sigma-Aldrich, Sofia, Bulgaria, Catalog Number P3032-1MU).
  • Streptomycin sulfate (Sigma, Cat. Number 5711-100GM).
  • Saline solution (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S8776).
  • Bacto™ TC Lactalbumin Hydrolysate (Thermofisher, catalog number 259962).
  • 70% Ethanol.
  • Fetal Bovine Serum (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. Number F7524-500ML).

4. Animals

Clinically healthy piglets, 4–6 weeks of age (8–15 kg), obtained from farms free from ASF, CSF, and other infectious diseases, are used. Animals were housed for one week before necropsy and monitored twice a day by veterinary staff. Water and feed were provided ad libitum.
Necropsy must be performed in accordance with BSL-3 guidelines and the approved statement from the Animal Ethics Committee.

5. Procedure

5.1. Selection of Tubular Bones

For the preparation of the cell culture, large tubular bones (humerus, radius, ulna, fibula, femur bone, and tibia) are taken during necropsy.
Sterile containers with samples are placed in a sterile waterproof metal lab container and transferred to the laboratory, where all subsequent stages of the cell culture preparation are performed.

5.2. Isolation of PBMP Cells

  • Place isolated tubular bones (humerus, ulna, radius, femur, and tibia) in a vessel and wash with 70% ethanol by incubating in a shaker-incubator at room-temperature and 250 rpm for 10–15 min in order to disinfect the surfaces of the samples (Figure 1A).
  • Remove the muscle and tissue mass from the bones with a surgical scalpel and rewash the bones, similar to step 1 (Figure 1B).
3.
Cut the bones with a sterile hand pruner into small cubes approximately 2 cm2, thereby exposing the bone marrow as much as possible (Figure 2A).
4.
Place the bone pieces uniformly in a T-225 plastic culture flask (Figure 2B).
5.
Add washing buffer (Table 1) to the bone pieces in a ratio of 1:1 (m/v), after which the vials are carefully inverted 1–2 times. Incubate at room temperature (RT) for 2 min, and then discard the buffer.
6.
Add saline solution in a ratio of 1:1.5 (m/v) into the flasks with bone pieces, and incubate in a shaker-incubator at 37 °C and 250 rpm for 20 min to remove the bone marrow cells from the bone cavities.
7.
Filter the cell suspension through an 8-layer medical gauze filter into a sterile glass vial (about 120 mL each). Step 6 can be repeated in order to gather more cells from the bone marrow. The filtrate is evenly poured into sterile centrifuge beakers and centrifuged at +4 °C and 1400 rpm for 20 min.
8.
After centrifugation, discard the supernatant and re-suspend the pellet in growth medium (Table 1) (about 25 mL for one glass vial). The cell suspension is successively passed through an 8-layer medical gauze filter and through nylon cell strainers with a mesh size of 100 and 70 µm.
9.
Calculate the cell concentration using a CountessTM automatic cell counter or analogue (ex. cell suspension sample is diluted 10 times in saline solution, and 0.4% trypan blue solution is added to the diluted volume in a ratio of 1:1 and loaded into the chamber of a disposable counter slide.)
Cell concentration is calculated by the formula:
X = H × 2 × 10;
where X is the number of cells in 1 cm3 of cell suspension; H is the number of living cells indicated by the device in 1 cm3 of a cell suspension sample; 2 is the coefficient of cell suspension dilution with 0.4% trypan blue solution; and 10 is the coefficient of dilution of the cell suspension with the saline solution
10.
Dilute the cell suspension in growth medium, and adjust to an inoculation concentration of 20–30 million cells/cm3.
11.
Add the diluted suspension of PBMP cells to cell culture flasks as indicated in Table 2.
12.
Incubate the flasks in a humidifier at +37 °C with 5% CO2 for 48 h.
13.
After a 48-h incubation, the growth medium is replaced with maintenance medium (Table 1) as shown in Table 3.
After changing the medium, cell growth is assessed under the microscope. PBMP macrophages should be round or oval and 40–60 microns in size with a smooth surface and a high density of attachment to the substrate, and they should be located singly and not form coagulates (Figure 3). A cell culture that does not adhere to the previously mentioned characteristics is discarded.
PBMP cell culture should be used, depending on the purpose of the study, within 2–5 days after adding maintenance medium.

6. Expected Results (Isolation of African Swine Fever Virus from Biological Samples)

Cell culture prepared in the laboratory can be in cell culture plates (48-wells or 96-wells) or in cell culture flasks such as T-25 or T-75, depending on the needs of the researchers. Plates are used for virus titration, while flasks can be used for the isolation of new viruses from biological materials or the accumulation of viruses for further uses, such as full genome sequencing.

6.1. Sample Preparation and Infection

Organ samples (spleen, whole blood, lungs, lymph nodes, or kidney) taken from infected animals or corps (wild boars or domestic pigs suspected of ASF) are homogenized, and a suspension is prepared by adding saline solution in a ratio of 1:10 (m/v), followed by centrifugation at 1100 g for 10 min. The supernatant is filtered through a Millex-HV Syringe filter (0.45 µm). Gentamicin sulfate (40mg/mL) is added to the filtrate at a final concentration of 0.01% and incubated for 1 h at a temperature ±37 °C, followed by inoculation into porcine PBMP cell culture. The flasks can be incubated up to 7 days at 37 °C in a 5% humidified CO2 incubator. The results are estimated under the microscope on a daily basis for the presence of hemadsorption.

6.2. ASF Virus Identification

The cell culture is examined for the presence of hamadsorption under a low magnification microscope (10 × 10). The first observation is performed 15–18 h after inoculation, and, subsequently, on a daily basis for 7 days. Before examination, the cell culture should be shaken slightly so that erythrocytes that are not attached to the surface of the cells will be evenly distributed in the culture medium.
The hemadsorption phenomenon is based on the attachment of erythrocytes to the surface of virus-infected macrophages. The result for ASF is considered positive in the presence of haemadsorption (Figure 4).
If there are no manifestations of hemadsorption in the inoculated cell culture during the observation period, it is necessary to conduct two additional passages in the PBMP cell culture. After the third passage, if no hemadsorption is observed, the VI result is considered negative (absence of the virus, or inactivated virus). Taking into consideration that not all ASFV are hemadsorbing, if no hemadsorption is detected, VI must be accompanied by RT-PCR in order to detect the virus and confirm its replication by Ct level.

7. Validation

To validate this cell culture for ASFV isolation and titration, different viruses were used to infect PBMP and porcine spleen cell culture (PSC) (n = 3) [29,30]. The viruses used included Arm07 (Genotype II), ASFV/ARRIAH/CV-30 (Genotype II, adapted to CV-1 cell culture by performed 30 consecutive passages) [29], Lisbon 60 (Genotype I), K49 (Genotype I), and Mozambique-78 (Genotype V), as well as 18 other isolates taken from different regions of the Russian Federation and all representing Genotype II (Supplementary Table S1). The 96-well cell culture plates were infected at 100 HADU50/cm3, and titer (in lg HADU50/cm3) was calculated on the fifth day after inoculation as described by de Leon et al. in 2013 [4]. The results are represented in Supplementary Table S1.

8. Conclusions

African swine fever virus isolation in cell culture is a critical step in virus characterization and the study of its biological properties. The rate of mutation in the virus genome due to its natural circulation between susceptible animals resulted in the appearance of 24 genotypes and a novel recombinant variant [31,32,33]. It is therefore essential to select the appropriate cell culture with high sensitivity and yield for VI. In recent studies, alveolar and blood origin macrophage cell culture preparation protocols have been described [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, continuous MA-104 cell culture has been recommended for VI, but its sensitivity on field isolates has not been tested. In this paper, we have described the protocol for preparing a PBMP cell culture with a high yield and sensitivity for studying and isolating any virus isolate.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mps6050073/s1, Table S1: Results of validating PBMP cell culture for ASFV isolation and titration (n = 3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.P., V.G., R.C. and A.M.; validation, O.P., V.G., R.C., I.K. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.I., A.S. and A.M.; supervision, A.I. and A.M.; funding acquisition, A.I., A.S. and I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant No. 075-15-2021-1054 from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia to implement objectives of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies during 2019–2027.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Natalya Vlasova (Federal Scientific Center All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Veterinary, named after the honorary K.I. Scriabin and Y.R. Kovalenko of the Russian Academy of Sciences) for guidance, advice, and comments while we prepared and optimized the protocol. The authors are also grateful to Antoinette van Schalkwyk (Agricultural Research Council—Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Pretoria, South Africa,) for her valuable advice, guidance, and comments on preparing the publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J.M.; Laddomada, A.; Arias, M.L. African Swine Fever Virus. In Diseases of Swine; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krug, P.W.; Holinka, L.G.; O’Donnell, V.; Reese, B.; Sanford, B.; Fernandez-Sainz, I.; Gladue, D.P.; Arzt, J.; Rodriguez, L.; Risatti, G.R.; et al. The Progressive Adaptation of a Georgian Isolate of African Swine Fever Virus to Vero Cells Leads to a Gradual Attenuation of Virulence in Swine Corresponding to Major Modifications of the Viral Genome. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 2324–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mazloum, A.; van Schalkwyk, A.; Shotin, A.; Zinyakov, N.; Igolkin, A.; Chernishev, R.; Debeljak, Z.; Korennoy, F.; Sprygin, A.V. Whole-genome sequencing of African swine fever virus from wild boars in the Kaliningrad region reveals unique and distinguishing genomic mutations. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 9, 1019808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De León, P.; Bustos, M.J.; Carrascosa, A.L. Laboratory methods to study African swine fever virus. Virus Res. 2013, 173, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hess, W.R.; DeTray, D.E. The use of leukocyte cultures for diagnosing African swine fever (ASF). Bull. Office Intern. Epizoot. 1960, 8, 317–320. [Google Scholar]
  6. Malmquist, W.A.; Hay, W. Hemadsorption and cytopathic effect produced by African swine fever virus in swine bone marrow and buffy coat cultures. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1960, 21, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Malmquist, W.A. Propagation, modification, and hemadsorption of African swine fever virus in cell cultures. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1962, 23, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Wardley, R.C.; Wilkinson, P.J.; Hamilton, F. African Swine Fever Virus Replication in Porcine Lymphocytes. J. Gen. Virol. 1977, 37, 425–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Greig, A.S.; Boulanger, P.; Bannister, G.L. African swine fever. V. Cultivation of the virus in primary pig kidney cells. Can. J. Comp. Med. Vet. Sci. 1967, 31, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
  10. Breese, S.S.; Stone, S.S.; Deboer, C.J.; Hess, W.R. Electron microscopy of the interaction of African swine fever virus with ferritin-conjugated antibody. Virology 1967, 31, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Castro, M.P. Compartamento do virus aftoso em cultura de celulas: Susceptibilidade da Rinhagem de celulas swinas IB-RS-2. Arq. Inst. Biol. Sao Paulo 1964, 31, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
  12. Breese, S.S.; DeBoer, C.J. Electron microscope observations of African swine fever virus in tissue culture cells. Virology 1966, 28, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Almeida, J.D.; Waterson, A.P.; Plowright, W. The morphological characteristics of African swine fever virus and its resemblance to tipula iridescent virus. Arch. Virol. 1967, 20, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dardiri, A.H.; Bachrach, H.L.; Heller, E. Inhibition by Rifampin of African Swine Fever Virus Replication in Tissue Culture. Infect. Immun. 1971, 4, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cox, B.F.; Hess, W.R. Note on the African swine fever investigation in Nysaland. Bull. epizoot. Dis. Afr. 1962, 10, 439–440. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gil-Fernandez, C.; Vilas-Minondo, P.; García-Gancedo, A. Plaque formation by African swine fever virus in chick embryo fibroblasts in the absence of CO2 atmosphere. Arch. Virol. 1976, 52, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ribeiro, M.J.; Azevedo, J.A.R. La peste porcine Africaine au Portugal. Bull. Off. int. Epizoot. 1961, 55, 88–106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Enjuanes, L.; Carrascosa, A.L.; Moreno, M.A.; Vinuela, E. Titration of African Swine Fever (ASF) Virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1976, 32, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tabarés, E.; Martinez, J.; Gonzalvo, F.R.; Sánchez-Botija, C. Proteins specified by African swine fever virus: II. Analysis of proteins in infected cells and antigenic properties. Arch. Virol. 1980, 66, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vigario, J.D.; Castro Portugal, F.L.; Ferreira, C.A.; Festas, M.B. Purification and Study of the Structural Polypeptides of African Swine Fever Virus; Commision of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 1977; pp. 469–482. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tabarés, E.; Olivares, I.; Santurde, G.; Garcia, M.J.; Martin, E.; Carnero, M.E. African swine fever virus DNA: Deletions and additions during adaptation to growth in monkey kidney cells. Arch. Virol. 1987, 97, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carrascosa, A.L.; Bustos, M.J.; Galindo, I.; Viñuela, E. Virus-specific cell receptors are necessary, but not sufficient, to confer cell susceptibility to African swine fever virus. Arch. Virol. 1999, 144, 1309–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hurtado, C.; Bustos, M.J.; Carrascosa, A.L. The use of COS-1 cells for studies of field and laboratory African swine fever virus samples. J. Virol. Methods 2010, 164, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Masujin, K.; Kitamura, T.; Kameyama, K.-I.; Okadera, K.; Nishi, T.; Takenouchi, T.; Kitani, H.; Kokuho, T. An immortalized porcine macrophage cell line competent for the isolation of African swine fever virus. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gómez-Villamandos, J.; Bautista, M.; Sánchez-Cordón, P.; Carrasco, L. Pathology of African swine fever: The role of monocyte-macrophage. Virus Res. 2013, 173, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rai, A.; Pruitt, S.; Ramirez-Medina, E.; Vuono, E.A.; Silva, E.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Carrillo, C.; Borca, M.V.; Gladue, D.P. Identification of a Continuously Stable and Commercially Available Cell Line for the Identification of Infectious African Swine Fever Virus in Clinical Samples. Viruses 2020, 12, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kwon, H.-I.; Do, D.T.; Van Vo, H.; Lee, S.-C.; Kim, M.H.; Nguyen, D.T.T.; Tran, T.M.; Le, Q.T.V.; Ngo, T.T.N.; Nguyen, N.M.; et al. Development of optimized protocol for culturing African swine fever virus field isolates in MA104 cells. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2022, 86, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhao, D.; Sun, E.; Huang, L.; Ding, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, T.; et al. Highly lethal genotype I and II recombinant African swine fever viruses detected in pigs. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mazloum, A.; Igolkin, A.S.; Zinyakov, N.G.; Van Schalkwyk, A.; Vlasova, N.N. Changes in the genome of African swine fever virus (Asfarviridae: Asfivirus: African swine fever virus) associated with adaptation to reproduction in continuous cell culture. Probl. Virol. 2021, 66, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mazloum, A.; van Schalkwyk, A.; Shotin, A.; Igolkin, A.; Shevchenko, I.; Gruzdev, K.N.; Vlasova, N. Comparative Analysis of Full Genome Sequences of African Swine Fever Virus Isolates Taken from Wild Boars in Russia in 2019. Pathogens 2021, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bastos, A.D.; Penrith, M.L.; Cruciere, C.; Edrich, J.L.; Hutchings, G.; Roger, F.; Couacy-Hymann, E.G.; Thomson, G.R. Genotypingfield strains of African swine fever virus by partial p72 gene characterisation. Arch. Virol. 2003, 148, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quembo, C.J.; Jori, F.; Vosloo, W.H.; Heath, L. Genetic characterization of African swine fever virus isolates from soft ticks at thewildlife/domestic interface in Mozambique and identification of a novel genotype. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mazloum, A.; van Schalkwyk, A.; Chernyshev, R.; Igolkin, A.; Heath, L.; Sprygin, A. A Guide to Molecular Characterization of Genotype II African Swine Fever Virus: Essential and Alternative Genome Markers. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Tubular bones used for the preparation of PBMP cell culture. (A) Skeletal scheme of domestic pig. (B) Tubular bones after removal of muscle and tissue mass.
Figure 1. Tubular bones used for the preparation of PBMP cell culture. (A) Skeletal scheme of domestic pig. (B) Tubular bones after removal of muscle and tissue mass.
Mps 06 00073 g001
Figure 2. Processing of tubular bones before washing. (A) Process of cutting bone into pieces for bone-marrowexposure. (B) Bone pieces in T-225 plastic culture flask.
Figure 2. Processing of tubular bones before washing. (A) Process of cutting bone into pieces for bone-marrowexposure. (B) Bone pieces in T-225 plastic culture flask.
Mps 06 00073 g002
Figure 3. Porcine bone marrow primary cell culture 48 h after preparation in T-75 flask. Blue arrow: porcine bone marrow macrophages. Red arrow: porcine red blood cells.
Figure 3. Porcine bone marrow primary cell culture 48 h after preparation in T-75 flask. Blue arrow: porcine bone marrow macrophages. Red arrow: porcine red blood cells.
Mps 06 00073 g003
Figure 4. Hemadsorption in PBMP cell culture infected with log103 HAU of ASFV isolate Arm07 48 h after infection (different amplifications 10×, 20×, 40×, and 60×).
Figure 4. Hemadsorption in PBMP cell culture infected with log103 HAU of ASFV isolate Arm07 48 h after infection (different amplifications 10×, 20×, 40×, and 60×).
Mps 06 00073 g004
Table 1. Reagents prepared right before starting the protocol.
Table 1. Reagents prepared right before starting the protocol.
Wash Buffer (1×)
Volume AddedFinal Concentration
Saline solutionUp to 500 mL
Gentamicin 40 mg/mL Solution10 mL1.6 mg/mL (1.6%)
Streptomycin sulfate1g0.1%
Penicillin G sodium salt106 Units103 Units
Growth Medium
Volume AddedFinal Concentration
Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)Up to 1000 mL
Lactalbumin hydrolysate2.5 g0.25%
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)150 mL15%
Gentamicin 40 mg/mL Solution2 mL0.08 mg/mL (0.08%)
Maintenance Medium
Volume AddedFinal Concentration
Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)Up to 1000 mL
Lactalbumin hydrolysate2.5 g0.25%
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)50 mL5%
Gentamicin 40 mg/mL Solution2 mL0.08 mg/mL (0.08%)
Table 2. Amount of PBMP cell culture (cell/cm3) to be added to cell culture flasks (area in cm2).
Table 2. Amount of PBMP cell culture (cell/cm3) to be added to cell culture flasks (area in cm2).
Area (cm2)Cell/cm3
Flask
T-252510–15 × 107
T-757530–45 × 107
T-22522515–20 × 108
Culture plates
48-well1.16–10 × 107
96-well0.322–3 × 107
Table 3. Minimum volume of maintenance medium (mL) to be added to the cell-culture flask (area in cm2).
Table 3. Minimum volume of maintenance medium (mL) to be added to the cell-culture flask (area in cm2).
Area (cm2)Volume (mL)
Flask
T-25253–5
T-75758–15
T-22522545–68
Culture plates
48-well1.10.2–0.4
96-well0.320.1–0.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Puzankova, O.; Gavrilova, V.; Chernyshev, R.; Kolbin, I.; Igolkin, A.; Sprygin, A.; Chvala, I.; Mazloum, A. Novel Protocol for the Preparation of Porcine Bone Marrow Primary Cell Culture for African Swine Fever Virus Isolation. Methods Protoc. 2023, 6, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050073

AMA Style

Puzankova O, Gavrilova V, Chernyshev R, Kolbin I, Igolkin A, Sprygin A, Chvala I, Mazloum A. Novel Protocol for the Preparation of Porcine Bone Marrow Primary Cell Culture for African Swine Fever Virus Isolation. Methods and Protocols. 2023; 6(5):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Puzankova, Olga, Vera Gavrilova, Roman Chernyshev, Ivan Kolbin, Alexey Igolkin, Alexandr Sprygin, Ilya Chvala, and Ali Mazloum. 2023. "Novel Protocol for the Preparation of Porcine Bone Marrow Primary Cell Culture for African Swine Fever Virus Isolation" Methods and Protocols 6, no. 5: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050073

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop