Next Article in Journal
Otolith Microchemistry Reveals the Diversity of Migration Patterns and Spawning Ground Distribution of Coilia nasus from the Yangtze River Estuary
Previous Article in Journal
Feeding Behavior and Bait Selection Characteristics for the Portunidae Crabs Portunus sanguinolentus and Charybdis natator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Dual Benefits of Fermented and Non-Fermented Garlic Powder on Growth, Antioxidative Capacity, Immune Responses, and Histology in Gray Mullet (Liza ramada)

by
Mohammed F. El Basuini
1,2,*,
Mahasen M. E. A. Shaban
1,
Abdelaziz M. El-Hais
1,
Ali A. Soliman
3,
Nermeen M. Abu-Elala
4,5,
Islam I. Teiba
1,
Mayada Alhoshy
6,
Ghada R. Sallam
3,
Ronick Spenly Shadrack
7,*,
Kumbukani Mzengereza
8 and
Akram Ismael Shehata
9
1
Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta City 31527, Egypt
2
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Desert Agriculture, King Salman International University, South Sinai 46612, Egypt
3
National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Kayet Bey, Al-Anfoushy, Alexandria 21556, Egypt
4
Department of Aquatic Animal Health and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt
5
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, King Salman International University, South Saini 46612, Egypt
6
College of Marine Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
7
Vanuatu Bureau of Standards Laboratory, Tagabe Agriculture Standards, Port Vila P.O. Box 6532, Vanuatu
8
Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Mzuzu University, Private Bag 201, Mzuzu 201, Malawi
9
Department of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2024, 9(10), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9100401
Submission received: 4 September 2024 / Revised: 1 October 2024 / Accepted: 2 October 2024 / Published: 3 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Feeding)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the effects of dietary garlic powder and fermented garlic powder supplementation at 1% and 2% levels on growth performance, digestive tract efficacy, blood biochemistry, immunity, and antioxidant status of Liza ramada (n = 225 fish; 86.00 ± 0.42 g) over a 60-day period. Fish fed diets supplemented with both forms of garlic at both levels exhibited significantly improved final body weight, weight gain, specific growth rate, and feed conversion ratio compared to the control group. Digestive enzyme activities (amylase, lipase, and protease) were significantly enhanced in all supplemented groups. Blood biochemical analysis revealed reduced glucose levels and increased total protein in garlic-supplemented groups, with no adverse effects on liver or kidney function markers. Immune parameters, including lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity against Streptococcus agalactiae, alternative complement pathway (ACP), and respiratory burst (NBT), were significantly enhanced in garlic-supplemented groups, with fermented garlic showing more pronounced effects. Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, and GPx) were also significantly increased in all supplemented groups, particularly in those fed fermented garlic. No significant differences in survival rates were observed among treatments. The results suggest that both garlic powder and fermented garlic powder supplementation, especially at the 2% level, can effectively improve growth, feed utilization, immune function, and antioxidant status in L. ramada. Fermented garlic generally demonstrated superior effects, indicating its potential as a beneficial feed additive in aquaculture. Based on these findings, it is recommended to incorporate fermented garlic powder at a 2% level in L. ramada diets to optimize growth performance and health status. Further research is warranted to investigate the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of this supplementation strategy in commercial aquaculture settings.
Key Contribution: This study demonstrates that dietary fermented and non-fermented garlic considerably boost growth, immunity, and antioxidants in Liza ramada.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture, representing one of the fastest-growing sectors in global food production, is pivotal in addressing the increasing demand for fish protein [1]. Among the various species cultivated, gray mullet (Liza ramada) is particularly valued for its adaptability, resilience to varying environmental conditions, and high nutritional content, making it a prime candidate for sustainable aquaculture practices [2,3]. In recent years, L. ramada has become important for Egyptian fish farmers, aiming to enhance aquaculture practices in Egypt [4]. However, enhancing the growth performance and health of gray mullet remains a significant challenge due to the susceptibility of fish to diseases and suboptimal growth conditions in intensive farming systems [5].
In aquaculture, the primary challenges are ensuring a steady supply of feed and managing its cost [6]. Feed expenses significantly impact the sustainability of fish farming across various species, including mullets. As feed typically accounts for 30–70% of the total operational costs, it plays a critical role in determining the profitability of aquaculture ventures [7]. This makes the research into the ingredients, particularly additives that can enhance and optimize diets, crucial for gradually decreasing production costs [8,9]. The broad availability and affordability of eco-friendly, plant-based products have positioned them as the most promising alternatives to synthetic options [10]. The growing interest in the global aquaculture sector has been driven by the ongoing identification and development of plant ingredients as substitutes for antibiotics, aiming to mitigate their significant side effects [11,12].
The use of dietary supplements to enhance fish health and growth is a well-established practice in aquaculture [13]. To minimize antibiotic usage in intensive fish farming, garlic (Allium sativum) has gained attention as a powerful natural additive due to its wide range of bioactive compounds, including allicin, saponins, and flavonoids, which possess antimicrobial, antioxidative, and immunomodulatory properties [14]. These properties make garlic a promising candidate for improving fish health and growth performance [15]. Fermentation, a traditional method to enhance the nutritional profile and bioavailability of food, further augments the benefits of garlic [16,17]. Fermented garlic, rich in enhanced bioactive components such as S-allyl mercaptocysteine and S-allyl cysteine, has shown superior antioxidative and immune-stimulating properties compared to its non-fermented counterpart [18]. The fermentation process increases the concentration of these beneficial compounds, potentially offering greater health benefits to animal species [19,20,21].
Garlic (A. sativum) has demonstrated notable benefits in aquaculture, improving growth, immune function, and disease resistance in a wide range of fish species [15,22]. Allicin, a key compound in garlic, enhances growth by boosting digestion and nutrient absorption [23]. For instance, garlic supplementation of 1% enhanced growth in Oreochromis niloticus, with similar results in juvenile tilapia [24,25]. Garlic at 3% improved growth and feed conversion in Tilapia zillii [26], while 2% garlic polysaccharide extract significantly benefited Clarias gariepinus juveniles [27,28]. Garlic supplementation also enhanced growth in Mugil cephalus larvae [29] and Lates calcarifer [30].
In terms of immunostimulant effects, garlic boosts leukocyte counts and enhances phagocytic activity in various species. Studies have shown increased immune responses in O. niloticus, L. calcarifer, O. mykiss, and Cyprinus carpio with garlic supplementation [31,32,33]. Garlic also improves skin mucus lysozyme activity and blood protein levels, enhancing disease resistance [34,35].
Garlic’s antimicrobial properties offer a safe alternative to antibiotics, effectively combating pathogens like Vibrio spp., E. coli, and Saprolegnia parasitica [15]. It has been shown to improve resistance to bacterial infections in species such as Labeo rohita and O. mykiss [31,36]. Additionally, garlic has antifungal and antiparasitic effects, showing promise against pathogens such as Candida and Trichodina sp. [37,38]. However, garlic’s effectiveness can vary by species, dosage, and feed-processing conditions, indicating the need for tailored applications to maximize benefits [39,40].
Despite the extensive research on the benefits of garlic in aquaculture, studies specifically examining the effects of fermented garlic on fish are notably scarce. To date, no comprehensive studies have explored the impact of fermented garlic on the growth, antioxidative capacity, immune responses, and intestinal histology of gray mullet (Liza ramada). This research thus represents the first report to investigate the comparative effects of non-fermented and fermented garlic in this species.
By elucidating the differential effects of these dietary interventions, this study aims to contribute to the development of sustainable and eco-friendly strategies for aquaculture, ultimately promoting the health and productivity of farmed fish. Understanding these effects could pave the way for innovative dietary approaches that enhance fish health and growth in an environmentally sustainable manner.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations and Experimental Setup

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Desert Agriculture at King Salman International University, Egypt (Reference No. KSIU/2024/DA-8). Experiments were carried out at the Baltim Research Station, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt. L. ramada fish were obtained from a commercial farm in Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt, and acclimatized for two weeks in laboratory conditions. A total of 225 healthy juvenile fish, each weighing approximately 86.00 ± 0.42 grams, were evenly distributed into 15 well-aerated 100-liter tanks at a density of 15 fish per tank. They were fed experimental diets to satiety three times a day (7:00–7:30 AM, 1:00–1:30 PM, and 5:00–5:30 PM) over a 60-day period. Daily monitoring of water quality parameters showed dissolved oxygen (DO) at 6.71 ± 0.31 mg/L, temperature at 25.34 ± 0.22 °C, and pH at 7.62 ± 0.54, using digital meters (Hanna, Romania, Do meter model HI 9,147, and pH meter model WT-80).

2.2. Source and Preparation of Garlic Forms

Standard garlic powder was prepared by initially peeling and slicing fresh garlic cloves. These were subsequently dehydrated using a vacuum oven at 60 °C until a moisture content below 5% was achieved. The dried garlic was then ground into a fine powder using a laboratory-grade mill. Fermented garlic powder was produced through a controlled microbial process. Fresh garlic cloves were immersed in a 10% (w/v) sodium chloride solution inoculated with a starter culture of Lactobacillus plantarum and allowed to ferment for six weeks at a controlled temperature of 25 °C. Following fermentation, the garlic cloves were meticulously rinsed with deionized water to eliminate residual salt and extraneous microorganisms. The cleaned cloves were then dehydrated to a moisture content below 5% using a vacuum oven at 60 °C. Finally, the dehydrated garlic was ground into a fine powder using a laboratory-grade mill. HPLC analysis was employed to quantify the organosulfur compounds, key bioactive components in garlic. A reversed-phase C18 column was used with a gradient elution of methanol and water containing 0.1% formic acid. Detection was achieved using a UV detector at 245 nm for allicin and 220 nm for diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide, and S-allyl cysteine.

2.3. Formulation of Experimental Diets

Five experimental diets were formulated, incorporating two forms of garlic (fermented and non-fermented) at levels of 1% and 2% per kg of diet, along with a control group without garlic. The diets were designed to be isonitrogenous (~33.42 ± 0.21% crude protein) and isolipidic (~7.99 ± 0.27% crude lipid), as outlined by Shehata, et al. [5]. Ingredients, including fish meal, soybean meal, fish oil, soybean oil, vitamins, and minerals [41], were sourced from a private feed factory in Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt (Table 1). Ingredients were weighed, ground, and mixed using an electric mixer, and then water was added to form doughs, which were pelletized using a small-scale meat mincer (0.3 mm diameter, Regina Supernova pellet mill, Roma, Italy). The pellets were air-dried, packed into plastic bags, and stored at −20 °C. Experimental diets were analyzed for moisture, dry matter, ash, crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber by following AOAC [42] procedures. Moisture content was determined by drying samples at 105 °C, crude protein by the Kjeldahl method, crude fat by Soxhlet extraction, crude fiber by acid and alkaline digestion, and ash content by incineration at 550 °C.

2.4. Sample Collection and Performance Metrics

After the 60-day feeding trial, fish were fasted for 24 h and anesthetized with ethyl 3-aminobenzoate (MS-222; 100 μg/mL). Performance metrics and survival rates were assessed.
WG   ,   % = W 60   W 0 W 0   × 100  
SGR ,   %   / day = Ln   W 60   Ln   W 0 60   × 100  
FCR = FI ,   g W 60   W 0 = FI ,   g WG ,   g
SR ,   % = N 60 N 0 × 100
where
WG: weight gain, W60: weight at 60 days of feeding, W0: initial weight, 60: experimental period (day), SGR: specific growth rate, FI: feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, SR: survival rate, N60: fish number at 60-day of feeding trial, and N0: fish number at the beginning of the feeding period.
Twelve fish from each group (4 fish/tank) were dissected for gut samples for digestive enzyme and tissue evaluation. Four fish per tank were randomly selected for blood sampling using a 1 mL sterile syringe. Blood was stored at 4 °C for 12 h, centrifuged (1789 g, 4 °C, 15 min) to obtain serum, and stored at −80 °C for blood chemistry analysis.

2.5. Digestive Enzyme Activity

To prepare the gut samples, they were homogenized for 60 seconds in an ice-cold mannitol buffer (50 mM mannitol + 2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7) at a 30:1 (v/w) ratio [43]. The homogenate was centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 minutes at 4 °C, and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 34,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The precipitate was resuspended in buffer (0.1 M KCl, 5 mM Tris-Hepes, 1 mM DTT; pH 7.5) for the evaluation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), protease [44], α-amylase, and lipase [45].

2.6. Blood Biochemical Parameters

Biochemical parameters were meticulously evaluated using a comprehensive array of Bio-diagnostic kits from Bio-diagnostic®, Egypt. These included glucose (Ref. No. GL 13 20), albumin (Ref. No. AB 10 10), triglyceride (Ref. No. TG 20 11), total cholesterol (Ref. No. TC 20 10), total protein (Ref. No. TP 20 20), ALT (glutamic pyruvic transaminase, Ref. No. AT 10 34), AST (glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, Ref. No. AT 10 45), urea (Ref. No. UR 21 10), and creatinine (Ref. No. CR 12 50). Each parameter was assessed with the utmost precision, strictly following the manufacturer’s detailed instructions, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the results [2].

2.7. Antioxidant Activity Assessment

Enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD, wavelengths (WL) = 550 nm), catalase (CAT, WL = 280 nm) [46], and glutathione peroxidase (GPx, WL = 412 nm) [47] were measured using ELISA kits from Cusabio Biotech Company, Ltd. (Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. These analyses were performed using a microplate spectrophotometer, following the manufacturer’s instructions meticulously.

2.8. Immune Function Tests

The serum lysozyme level (LYZ) was quantified using a turbidometric assay, as described by Lygren, et al. [48]. To gauge serum bactericidal activity, we used an Escherichia coli suspension and assessed inhibition at 570 nm, following the method outlined by El Basuini, et al. [49]. Additionally, the oxidative burst of neutrophils was evaluated through a nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) assay, a technique detailed by Anderson and Siwicki [50]. To determine alternative complement pathway activities (ACPs), we also applied the methods described by Yano [51] using serum samples.

2.9. Histological Examination of Intestine and Liver

Intestine and liver samples were rinsed with sterile cold PBS (pH ~7.4) and immersed in 10% buffered formalin for two days. Samples were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, sectioned to 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin [52,53]. High-resolution photomicrographs of the stained sections were captured using a Leica EC3 digital camera mounted on a Leica DM500 microscope (Leica, Germany).

2.10. Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

The data were collected and assessed for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (version 20). A one-way ANOVA was employed to determine the effects of dietary garlic on the means, with Duncan’s multiple range test applied to identify significant mean differences. Results are presented as means ± standard errors (SEs), and significance was defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Garlic Organosulfur Compounds

Table 2 provides a comparative analysis of the concentration of key organosulfur compounds in both fermented and non-fermented garlic powder. In non-fermented garlic powder, allicin is present at a concentration of 3.2 mg/g, whereas in fermented garlic powder, this concentration dramatically decreases to 0.1 mg/g. Conversely, the concentration of diallyl sulfide (DAS) increases from 0.9 mg/g in non-fermented garlic powder to 2.1 mg/g in fermented garlic powder, indicating that fermentation enhances the formation of DAS. Similarly, diallyl disulfide (DADS) shows a substantial increase, with concentrations rising from 1.6 mg/g in non-fermented garlic to 4.8 mg/g in its fermented counterpart, suggesting enhanced bioactivity through fermentation. The level of S-allyl cysteine remains relatively stable, with a slight increase from 4.9 mg/g in non-fermented garlic to 5.1 mg/g in fermented garlic powder, highlighting its preservation during fermentation.

3.2. Growth, Feed Utilization, and Survival Rate

Table 3 presents the performance of Liza ramada (growth, feed efficacy, and survival%) fed experimental diets supplemented with garlic powder and fermented garlic powder at 1% and 2% levels for 60 days. Fish fed diets containing garlic powder or fermented garlic powder at both 1% and 2% levels exhibited significantly higher final body weight (FBW), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The final body weights ranged from 243.50 ± 2.08 g to 248.15 ± 4.33 g for the supplemented groups, compared to 225.43 ± 2.93 g for the control group. The specific growth rate (SGR) was significantly improved in all supplemented groups (1.73–1.77%/day) compared to the control (1.60 ± 0.03%/day). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in growth parameters between the different types (garlic powder vs. fermented garlic powder) or levels (1% vs. 2%) of supplementation. All experimental groups receiving a diet supplemented with garlic or fermented garlic powder exhibited the highest feed intake (239.22–239.97 g), significantly surpassing the control group (228.93 g), which consumed the least amount of feed. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly lower in all supplemented groups (1.48–1.52) compared to the control group (1.65 ± 0.05), indicating improved feed utilization efficiency with garlic supplementation (p < 0.05). The lowest FCR values were observed in the fermented garlic groups (1.48 ± 0.03 and 1.48 ± 0.04 for 1% and 2%, respectively), although these were not statistically different from the garlic powder groups. Survival rates (SR%) were high across all experimental groups, ranging from 97.78% to 100%, with no significant differences observed between treatments.

3.3. Digestive Enzymes

Table 4 presents the digestive enzyme activity of L. ramada after 60 days on experimental diets supplemented with garlic powder and fermented garlic powder at 1% and 2% levels. All three digestive enzymes examined (amylase, lipase, and protease) showed significantly increased activity in fish fed diets supplemented with either garlic powder or fermented garlic powder compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Amylase activity was significantly higher in all supplemented groups (ranging from 15.85 ± 1.09 to 16.44 ± 1.21 U/mg) compared to the control group (11.71 ± 0.64 U/mg). The highest amylase activity was observed in the fermented garlic 2% group, although there were no significant differences among the supplemented groups. Lipase activity showed a similar trend, with all supplemented groups exhibiting significantly higher activity (23.19 ± 0.75 to 24.49 ± 1.36 U/mg) compared to the control group (18.95 ± 0.94 U/mg). The fermented garlic 2% group showed the highest lipase activity, but again, there were no significant differences among the supplemented groups. Protease activity followed the same pattern, with significantly higher activity in all supplemented groups (20.04 ± 0.75 to 20.26 ± 1.36 U/mg) compared to the control group (15.77 ± 0.62 U/mg). As with the other enzymes, there were no significant differences in protease activity among the different garlic supplementation groups.

3.4. Intestine and Liver Histology

Histological examination of the L. ramada intestine in control and garlic-treated groups revealed a normal intestinal structure. Garlic supplementation led to increased intestinal villi length and branching. Intestine morphology showed normal mucosa and wall in all groups, with enhanced villi length, branching, and goblet cell number in garlic-supplemented fish (Table S1). Immune cell infiltration was observed near villous crypts in 33% (4 out of 12) of the fish treated with the highest fermented garlic dose (Figure 1). The liver exhibited normal parenchyma across all groups, but fermented garlic powder treatment induced notable changes (Figure 2), such as increased glycogen deposits, visible as lightly stained, clear areas in hepatocytes (green arrowheads); perivascular and periductal accumulation of melanomacrophages in 42% (5 out of 12) of treated fish, appearing as darker pigmented cells around blood vessels and bile ducts (blue arrowheads); and normal bile ducts (yellow arrowheads) surrounded by melanomacrophage accumulation in treated groups (Figure 2).

3.5. Blood Biochemical Parameters

Table 5 presents the blood biochemical parameters of L. ramada following a 60-day experimental period with diets supplemented with garlic powder and fermented garlic powder at 1% and 2% levels. Glucose levels were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in all garlic-supplemented groups (ranging from 88.00 ± 3.46 to 93.67 ± 4.26 mg/dL) compared to the control group (114.00 ± 5.20 mg/dL). The lowest glucose concentration was observed in the fermented garlic 2% group, although there were no significant differences among the supplemented groups. Total protein levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in all garlic-supplemented groups (6.68 ± 0.70 to 6.82 ± 0.25 g/dL) compared to the control group (5.10 ± 0.37 g/dL). The fermented garlic 2% group showed the highest total protein concentration, but there were no significant differences among the supplemented groups. Globulin levels showed a trend towards higher values in the garlic-supplemented groups (4.90 ± 0.38 to 5.09 ± 0.51 g/dL) compared to the control (3.48 ± 0.25 g/dL), although these differences were not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in blood levels of albumin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT, AST, urea, or creatinine between the control and garlic-supplemented groups. However, there was a trend towards lower total cholesterol levels in the garlic-supplemented groups (9.00 ± 1.15 to 10.33 ± 1.45 mg/dL) compared to the control (13.33 ± 1.20 mg/dL), though this difference was not statistically significant.

3.6. Immunity

Figure 3 presents the immune parameters of L. ramada after a 60-day feeding experiment with diets supplemented with garlic powder and fermented garlic powder at 1% and 2% levels. Lysozyme activity showed a significant increase in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control (p < 0.05). The activity increased in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest values observed in the fermented garlic 2% group, followed by fermented garlic 1%, garlic 2%, and garlic 1%. The control group had the lowest lysozyme activity.
Bactericidal activity against S. agalactiae also demonstrated a significant increase in all supplemented groups compared to the control (p < 0.05). The fermented garlic 2% group showed the highest inhibition percentage, followed closely by fermented garlic 1%. Both garlic powder groups (1% and 2%) showed similar levels of inhibition, which were significantly higher than the control but lower than the fermented garlic groups.
The respiratory burst activity, measured by NBT reduction, exhibited a similar trend. All garlic-supplemented groups had significantly higher NBT% compared to the control (p < 0.05). The fermented garlic groups (1% and 2%) showed the highest NBT%, with no significant difference between them. The garlic powder groups also showed significantly increased NBT% compared to the control, with the 2% group having a higher value than the 1% group.
Serum alternative complement pathway (ACP) activity was significantly enhanced in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control (p < 0.05). Both fermented garlic groups (1% and 2%) showed the highest ACP activity, with no significant difference between them. The garlic powder groups (1% and 2%) also exhibited significantly increased ACP activity compared to the control, but at a lower level than the fermented garlic groups.

3.7. Antioxidants

Figure 4 demonstrates the antioxidant status in the serum of L. ramada after a 60-day feeding period with diets supplemented with garlic powder and fermented garlic powder at 1% and 2% levels. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity showed a significant increase in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control (p < 0.05). The highest SOD activity was observed in the fermented garlic groups (1% and 2%), with no significant difference between them. The garlic powder groups also exhibited significantly increased SOD activity compared to the control, with the 2% group showing higher activity than the 1% group.
Catalase (CAT) activity demonstrated a similar trend, with all garlic-supplemented groups showing significantly higher activity compared to the control (p < 0.05). The fermented garlic groups (1% and 2%) exhibited the highest CAT activity, with no significant difference between them. The garlic powder groups also showed significantly increased CAT activity compared to the control, with the 2% group having higher activity than the 1% group, although this difference was not statistically significant.
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was significantly enhanced in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control (p < 0.05). The fermented garlic groups (1% and 2%) and the garlic powder 2% group showed the highest GPx activity, with no significant differences among them. The garlic powder 1% group also exhibited significantly increased GPx activity compared to the control, but at a lower level than the other supplemented groups.

4. Discussion

With the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotics diminishing for treating various bacterial infections in humans, several European countries have banned the use of dietary antibiotics [54]. This shift has spurred significant interest in identifying alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters in the aquaculture industry. Among these alternatives, garlic (A. sativum) supplementation has emerged as a promising option for managing fish health due to its accessibility, affordability, and broad-spectrum effectiveness against pathogens. Research has demonstrated that garlic not only promotes fish growth but also enhances the immune system and controls pathogens, particularly bacteria and fungi [55].
The biological activity of organosulfur compounds, such as S-allyl-1-cysteine, diallyl disulfide, diallyl trisulfide, ajoene, and allicin, is fundamental to garlic’s renowned healing properties [56]. Our study aligns with previous research, highlighting the significant impact of fermentation on the concentration and efficacy of these compounds. Notably, we observed a dramatic decrease in allicin concentration from 3.2 mg/g in non-fermented garlic to 0.1 mg/g in fermented garlic. Allicin, the primary bioactive component in raw garlic, is converted from alliin by the enzyme alliinase when garlic cloves are crushed [39]. Despite its numerous antimicrobial effects, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and antiparasitic activities [57], allicin’s instability results in its rapid decomposition during fermentation.
In contrast, our results show an increase in diallyl sulfide (DAS) from 0.9 mg/g in non-fermented garlic to 2.1 mg/g in fermented garlic and a substantial rise in diallyl disulfide (DADS) from 1.6 mg/g to 4.8 mg/g. These findings indicate that fermentation enhances the formation of these more stable sulfur compounds. Diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide, derivatives of allicin found in garlic essential oils, are known for their potent antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [58]. The increased concentrations of DAS and DADS suggest that fermentation could enhance garlic’s antimicrobial efficacy, as sulfide compounds with more sulfur atoms exhibit stronger antimicrobial activity [59].
Additionally, the slight increase in S-allyl cysteine from 4.9 mg/g in non-fermented garlic to 5.1 mg/g in fermented garlic underscores the preservation of this important compound during fermentation. S-allyl cysteine is recognized for its antioxidant and neuroprotective properties, and its stability is beneficial for maintaining the health-promoting qualities of fermented garlic. Previous studies have shown that allicin induces an immediate and total inhibition of RNA synthesis, with RNA polymerase being a likely target due to allicin’s reaction with thiol groups in enzymes [60]. However, the reduction of allicin and the corresponding increase in its derivatives like DADS and DAS in fermented garlic suggest that these compounds may play a more crucial role in the prolonged antimicrobial efficacy of fermented garlic products. These derivatives, identified as major components in garlic oil, contribute significantly to garlic’s overall bioactivity [61]. Based on our observed improvements in growth, immunity, and antioxidant status in fish supplemented with fermented garlic, it can be postulated that the increased levels of sulfide compounds (DADS and DAS) may promote these indicators more strongly than allicin. The enhanced stability and bioavailability of DADS and DAS, compared to the transient nature of allicin, suggest that these compounds could exert more sustained beneficial effects on fish health. However, further research directly comparing the individual and synergistic effects of these compounds is needed to conclusively establish their relative contributions to the observed health benefits.
In the present study, garlic powder and fermented garlic powder significantly improved growth and feed efficiency in L. ramada. Both types of garlic supplementation at 1% and 2% levels resulted in higher FBW, WG, and SGR compared to the control group. Supplemented groups showed a lower FCR, indicating better feed utilization, with fermented garlic showing the lowest FCR values, though not significantly different from garlic powder groups. Survival rates were consistently high across all experimental groups.
These findings are consistent with previous studies showing the growth-promoting effects of garlic. For example, garlic supplementation at 1% level has been shown to improve growth parameters such as final weight and SGR in O. niloticus [62] and other species. Garlic powder has also been effective at 2% in Clarias gariepinus [28] and 3% in Mugil cephalus [29]. Similar positive effects have been reported for L. calarifer with varying garlic concentrations [30] and O. mykiss with garlic supplements [39].
However, garlic supplementation does not uniformly enhance growth across all fish species. Studies have shown no significant growth response in Perca fluviatilis juveniles [63] and Tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) with varying garlic doses [64]. Red tilapia and hybrid tilapia (O. niloticus × O. aureus) also showed no significant growth improvement with garlic [65,66]. Additionally, Poecilia reticulata [34] and some studies on C. gariepinus found no significant weight gain with garlic supplementation [67].
Variations in growth responses may be due to factors such as fish species, diet composition, garlic dosage, and developmental stage [39]. The effectiveness of garlic might also be influenced by feed processing and the instability of allicin [68]. Overall, garlic powder and fermented garlic powder are effective at improving fish growth and feed utilization. While the specific type of garlic and dosage (1% and 2%) do not significantly affect growth parameters, fermentation seems to enhance feed efficiency.
It is important to note that the strong odor of garlic may significantly influence feed intake. Fermentation has been shown to improve the flavor of garlic products [69], potentially reducing the pungency and enhancing feed intake. Consequently, the fermented garlic powder used in this study might have contributed to increased feed consumption. However, to our knowledge, there are no existing studies evaluating the impact of fermented garlic powder on growth performance across various diets and species. Therefore, further research is needed to assess the effects of fermented garlic powder on growth performance in different fish species, particularly with different dietary formulations.
Garlic supplementation, as noted by Nya and Austin [70], boosts digestive enzyme activity in rainbow trout, which is consistent with our findings. Garlic enhances digestion by increasing bile acid secretion and stimulating enzymes such as lipase, trypsin, alkaline phosphatase, protease, and amylase [71]. This improved enzyme activity aids in the digestion of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, promoting growth [72]. In the current study, fish-fed garlic powder or fermented garlic powder had higher amylase, lipase, and protease activities compared to the control. The 2% fermented garlic group had the highest enzyme levels, though differences among supplementation groups were not significant. Overall, both garlic forms effectively increased digestive enzyme activity, likely contributing to enhanced growth.
Histological examination of the intestine and liver is essential for evaluating the structural integrity and functional health of these organs in fish [73]. This study demonstrated that garlic supplementation led to significant improvements in intestinal morphology. Fish fed garlic-supplemented diets showed increased villi length, branching, and goblet cell number, while maintaining normal mucosa and intestinal wall structure. Notably, immune cell infiltration near villous crypts was observed, particularly at the highest dose of fermented garlic, suggesting an immunomodulatory effect. These enhancements in intestinal structure provide valuable insights into the fish’s gastrointestinal health and nutrient absorption capacity [74].
Previous research supports these findings. Adibmoradi, et al. [75] reported histological and morphological changes in the intestines of fowl with 2% garlic supplementation, indicating garlic’s potential to affect intestinal structure across species. Conversely, Agbebi, et al. [76] found no histological changes in Clarias gariepinus fed garlic-containing diets, highlighting species-specific responses. Mohammad [77] observed that garlic powder improved growth performance and histological properties in Cyprinus carpio, further supporting our results. These improvements indicate increased absorptive surface area and nutrient uptake capacity.
The liver, critical for detoxification and metabolic functions [78], also responded significantly to garlic supplementation. All groups exhibited normal liver parenchyma with no inflammatory or degenerative changes. However, fish fed fermented garlic powder showed a significant increase in glycogen deposits and perivascular and periductal melanomacrophage accumulation. These findings align with the outcomes observed in the present study, where garlic supplementation positively affected liver histology in Nile tilapia [79]. These effects might be attributed to specific interactions between garlic in different forms and the fish’s metabolism, potentially influencing lipid metabolism and vascular integrity. These findings are consistent with the literature review by Valenzuela-Gutiérrez, et al. [15], which explored similar metabolic disruptions caused by dietary changes.
Taken together, the intestinal and liver changes in garlic-treated fish may reflect natural defense responses or adaptation to garlic. Garlic’s value lies in its disease-controlling effects with minimal side effects. While improvements in intestinal villi and glycogen deposition suggest benefits, further research is needed to understand the mechanisms and potential long-term impacts.
Evaluating biochemical parameters in fish is essential for understanding their physiological status, health, and response to dietary interventions [80]. In this study, glucose levels were significantly lower in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control group, with the lowest concentration observed in the 2% fermented garlic group. However, no significant differences were noted among the supplemented groups. These findings are consistent with those of Lee, et al. [81], who reported a hypoglycemic effect in juvenile Acipenser ruthenus fed a diet with 0.5% garlic extract, showing blood plasma glucose depletion after 1 h (50.8 mg/dL) and 24 hours (57.6 mg/dL) post-feeding. Similarly, Thomson and Ali [82] and Kumar and Reddy [83] found that feeding mice 45 mg of garlic per kg body weight for 28 days significantly decreased serum glucose levels. Lower plasma glucose levels in fish have also been documented in studies assessing the physiological effects of A. sativum [63]. Garlic’s ability to decrease blood glucose is likely due to its effect on increasing serum insulin levels [84]. According to Ademiluyi, et al. [85] and Vazquez-Prieto, et al. [86], the S-allyl cysteine sulfoxide in garlic is responsible for its hypoglycemic activity.
Total protein levels were higher in all garlic-supplemented groups, with the 2% fermented garlic group showing the highest concentration, though differences among these groups were not statistically significant. There was also a trend towards higher globulin levels in the garlic-supplemented groups, although these differences were not significant. This aligns with findings that higher serum protein profiles, including total protein, albumin, and globulin levels, are linked to a stronger innate immune response and improved survival rates in fish [39,87]. Previous research has indicated that total plasma protein levels in fish typically range from 2 to 8 g/dL [88]. Sahu, et al. [36] found increased serum total protein, albumin, and glucose levels in L. rohita after 60 days of feeding with A. sativum compared to a control diet. Similarly, Nwabueze [89] observed elevated plasma protein levels in C. gariepinus when fed diets containing various concentrations of garlic.
No statistically significant differences were observed in blood levels of albumin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT, AST, urea, or creatinine between the control and garlic-supplemented groups in this study. However, there was a trend towards lower total cholesterol levels in the garlic-supplemented groups. These results align with the findings of Abdelwahab, et al. [90], who reported significant decreases in serum total lipids and cholesterol in juvenile L. calcarifer treated with garlic. ÖZ and DİKel [91] also found a significant decrease in serum total lipids in O. mykiss after garlic administration. Conversely, other studies, such as one on C. carpio, showed slight increases in serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels with traditional Chinese medicine extracts, though differences were not significant [92]. The variability in findings across studies may be due to differences in the composition and quantity of sulfur components in various garlic preparations, highlighting the need for standardization [18]. Other contributing factors could include subject recruitment, study duration, dietary control, lifestyle, and lipid analysis methods [93]. Lee, et al. [81] reported that garlic inhibits cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver, though the precise mechanisms are not fully understood. Consequently, additional research is required to clarify the relationship between garlic dosage, application duration, biochemical effects, and fish species.
Allicin, the primary bioactive component of garlic, is well-documented for its antibacterial, antiparasitic, and antifungal properties [94]. It has the potential to reduce intestinal inflammation and exert an inhibitory immunomodulatory effect on intestinal epithelial cells [95]. Arreola, et al. [96] further suggested that Allium species enhance immune activities, including phagocytosis, cytokine release, natural killer cell activity, and lymphocyte synthesis.
Lysozyme, an enzyme crucial for its antimicrobial properties, is produced by leukocytes. It functions by breaking down microbial cell walls and activating the immune complement system [97]. In this study, lysozyme activity significantly increased in all garlic-supplemented groups compared to the control, with a dose-dependent effect. The highest activity was observed in the 2% fermented garlic group, followed by the 1% fermented garlic, 2% garlic powder, and 1% garlic powder groups, with the control group having the lowest activity. Previous studies have shown that garlic increases serum lysozyme activity in various fish species [36,98,99] and enhances skin mucus lysozyme activity, thereby boosting immunity and pathogen resistance [100]. Similar findings were reported in Salmo caspius [98], Sparus aurata [101], and Poecilia reticulata [34].
In fish, phagocytosis is a key defense mechanism that involves lysozyme, NBT, and ACH50 [45]. In the current study, all garlic-supplemented groups exhibited significantly increased bactericidal activity, respiratory burst activity, and ACP activity compared to the control. The 2% fermented garlic group showed the highest effects, followed by the 1% fermented garlic group. The garlic powder groups also showed significant increases, but to a lesser extent than the fermented garlic groups.
Garlic enhances immunity by increasing phagocytic activity and respiratory burst in species such as Asian sea bass and rainbow trout [30,31], and stimulates superoxide anion production in Labeo rohita [36]. In some fish, the immunomodulatory effects of garlic are dose-dependent, as observed in hybrid tilapia [66]. However, these effects are not universal, as seen in juvenile Perca fluviatilis, where no significant impact on respiratory burst or phagocytic activity was reported [63].
SOD, CAT, and GPx are integral components of the primary antioxidant defense system, protecting cells from free radicals generated during normal metabolism [102]. SOD is the initial enzyme responsible for converting superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen [103]. Subsequently, catalase breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen in peroxisomes, while GPx performs a similar function in mitochondria, where catalase is absent [102]. In this study, garlic supplementation led to a significant increase in SOD activity across all groups, with the highest levels observed in the 1% and 2% fermented garlic groups. CAT activity also showed substantial increases, particularly in the fermented garlic groups. Similarly, GPx activity was significantly elevated in all garlic-supplemented groups, with the highest levels found in the 2% fermented garlic group and 2% garlic powder group.
Garlic’s antioxidant benefits are attributed to its phenolic and saponin compounds, which inhibit free radical formation, enhance endogenous radical scavenging, and boost antioxidant enzyme activities, including SOD, CAT, and GPx [61]. These compounds also support cellular defense mechanisms against oxidative stress [104] and protect low-density lipoproteins from oxidative damage [105].
Previous research supports these findings. Metwally [24] demonstrated that garlic supplementation improved antioxidant enzyme activities in O. niloticus, including GPx, SOD, and CAT. Similarly, Mohebbi, et al. [106] found that garlic reduced lipid peroxidation and increased antioxidant enzyme activities in O. mykiss. Valenzuela-Gutiérrez, et al. [15] observed significant increases in GPx, CAT, and GR activities in trout that are fed garlic and onion oils, further confirming garlic’s role in enhancing antioxidant defenses. Overall, garlic supplementation effectively boosts key antioxidant enzymes in fish, supporting its use as a dietary additive to improve oxidative stress management and overall health in aquaculture.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals the remarkable potential of garlic supplementation in enhancing the growth, health, and metabolic efficiency of L. ramada. By shifting from non-fermented to fermented garlic, we observed a transformation in organosulfur compounds, with a dramatic increase in diallyl sulfide and diallyl disulfide, which are crucial for boosting the fish’s vitality and immune response. The incorporation of garlic, particularly in its fermented form, not only improved growth parameters and feed efficiency but also enriched digestive enzyme activity and antioxidant defenses. These enhancements were accompanied by better intestinal and liver health, underscoring the significant role of garlic in aquaculture nutrition. Based on these compelling results, it is recommended to include fermented garlic powder at a 2% level in L. ramada diets to achieve optimal growth and health outcomes. To fully capitalize on these benefits, further research is essential to explore the long-term impacts and economic feasibility of this supplementation in commercial aquaculture systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fishes9100401/s1, Table S1. Intestinal morphometry indices of Liza ramada fed of Liza ramada fed test diets for 60 days.

Author Contributions

M.F.E.B.: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. M.M.E.A.S.: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, visualization. A.M.E.-H.: methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision. A.A.S.: methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization. N.M.A.-E.: methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision. I.I.T.: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. M.A.: methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, writing—review and editing. G.R.S.: methodology, software, validation, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization. R.S.S.: investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. K.M.: resources, data curation, visualization, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—original draft. A.I.S.: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Desert Agriculture, King Salman International University (KSIU/2024/DA-8).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. El Basuini, M.F.; Abdel Fattah, A.M.; El-Hais, A.M.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Gewaily, M.; Zaki, M.A.A.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Dossou, S.; Teiba, I.I.; et al. Dietary co-enzyme Q10 boosted the growth performance, antioxidative capacity, immune responses, and intestinal and hepatic histomorphology of grey mullet (Liza ramada). Aquac. Rep. 2024, 36, 102147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shehata, A.I.; Shahin, S.A.; Elmaghraby, A.M.; Alhoshy, M.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Habib, Y.J.; Gewaily, M.S.; El Basuini, M.F. Synergistic benefits of dietary silymarin and selenium on growth, immune functions, antioxidants, and gut/liver health of Thinlip mullet (Liza ramada) juveniles. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shaalan, M.; El-Mahdy, M.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Aquaculture in Egypt: Insights on the Current Trends and Future Perspectives for Sustainable Development. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2018, 26, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shehata, A.I.; Shahin, S.A.; Elmaghraby, A.M.; Alhoshy, M.; Toutou, M.M.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Habib, Y.J.; Gewaily, M.S.; Teiba, I.I.; et al. Stevioside mitigates lead toxicity in thinlip mullet juveniles: Impacts on growth, metabolism, and immune function. Aquatic Toxicol. 2024, 271, 106910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boyd, C.E.; D’Abramo, L.R.; Glencross, B.D.; Huyben, D.C.; Juarez, L.M.; Lockwood, G.S.; McNevin, A.A.; Tacon, A.G.J.; Teletchea, F.; Tomasso Jr, J.R.; et al. Achieving sustainable aquaculture: Historical and current perspectives and future needs and challenges. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2020, 51, 578–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Araujo, G.S.; Silva, J.W.A.d.; Cotas, J.; Pereira, L. Fish Farming Techniques: Current Situation and Trends. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Saxena, M.J. Feed Additives in Animal Health. In Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine; Gupta, R.C., Srivastava, A., Lall, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 345–362. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shehata, A.I.; Rasheed, M.; Rafiq, H.; Khalid, N.; Rafique, A.; Alhoshy, M.; Habib, Y.J.; El Basuini, M.F. Multi-functional application of octacosanol as a feed additive in animal and aquaculture: A review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 108, 1595–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hossain, M.S.; Small, B.C.; Kumar, V.; Hardy, R. Utilization of functional feed additives to produce cost-effective, ecofriendly aquafeeds high in plant-based ingredients. Rev. Aquac. 2024, 16, 121–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eroldoğan, O.T.; Glencross, B.; Novoveska, L.; Gaudêncio, S.P.; Rinkevich, B.; Varese, G.C.; de Fátima Carvalho, M.; Tasdemir, D.; Safarik, I.; Nielsen, S.L.; et al. From the sea to aquafeed: A perspective overview. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 1028–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alagawany, M. Antibiotic Alternatives in Poultry and Fish Feed; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gatlin, D.M.; Yamamoto, F.Y. Chapter 11—Nutritional supplements and fish health. In Fish Nutrition, 4rth ed.; Hardy, R.W., Kaushik, S.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 745–773. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta, A.J.; Mainkar, P.; Mahajan, V. Exploring the Nutritional-Nutraceutical Composition and Phytochemical Potential of Garlic Agents in Preclinical and Clinical Studies with a Focus on Drug Likeness. J. Herb. Med. 2024, 46, 100911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Valenzuela-Gutiérrez, R.; Lago-Lestón, A.; Vargas-Albores, F.; Cicala, F.; Martínez-Porchas, M. Exploring the garlic (Allium sativum) properties for fish aquaculture. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 47, 1179–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Afzaal, M.; Saeed, F.; Rasheed, R.; Hussain, M.; Aamir, M.; Hussain, S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Alamri, M.S.; Anjum, F.M. Nutritional, biological, and therapeutic properties of black garlic: A critical review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2021, 24, 1387–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.M.; Tarfeen, N.; Mohamed, H.; Song, Y. Fermented Foods: Their Health-Promoting Components and Potential Effects on Gut Microbiota. Fermentation 2023, 9, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ozma, M.A.; Abbasi, A.; Ahangarzadeh Rezaee, M.; Hosseini, H.; Hosseinzadeh, N.; Sabahi, S.; Noori, S.M.A.; Sepordeh, S.; Khodadadi, E.; Lahouty, M.; et al. A Critical Review on the Nutritional and Medicinal Profiles of Garlic’s (Allium sativum L.) Bioactive Compounds. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 6324–6361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adi, A.C.; Susanti, Y.; Rachmawati, H.; Ishaura, E.R.; Farapti, F.; Salisa, W.; Rasyidi, M.F.; Sutthiwong, N. Effects of fermented and non-fermented garlic as an anti-diabetic on blood glucose levels of wistar rat. J. Public Health Afr. 2023, 15, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, K.; Lee, K.; Kim, G.; Kim, J.; Yeon, J.; Cho, S.; Chang, B.; Kim, S. Effects of dietary fermented garlic on the growth performance, relative organ weights, intestinal morphology, cecal microflora and serum characteristics of broiler chickens. Rev. Bras. Ciência Avícola 2016, 18, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, W.-D.; Kothari, D.; Moon, S.-G.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.-I.; Ga, G.-W.; Kim, Y.-G.; Kim, S.-K. Evaluation of Non-Fermented and Fermented Chinese Chive Juice as an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoters of Broilers. Animals 2022, 12, 2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Wang, F.; Yin, Y.; Ma, X. The nutritional applications of garlic (Allium sativum) as natural feed additives in animals. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Song, Q.; Ding, J.; Han, B.; Zhao, C. Dietary allicin improves behavior, physiology, growth, and disease resistance in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture 2024, 593, 741321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Metwally, M. Effects of garlic (Allium sativum) on some antioxidant activities in tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus). World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 2009, 1, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  25. Setijaningsih, L.; Setiadi, E.; Taufik, I. The effect of garlic Allium sativum addition in feed to the growth performance and immune response of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 744, 012072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ajiboye, O.O.; Qari, R. Short-term evaluation of graded levels of dietary garlic powder (Allium sativum L.) as growth promoter on growth, survival and feed utilization of redbelly Tilapia, Tilapia zillii reared in glass aquaria tanks. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2016, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ayoola, S.; Uzoamaka, O. Effect of Allium sativum on growth, feed utilization and haematological parameters of Clarias gariepinus juvenile. Afr. J. Livest. Ext. 2013, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gabriel, N.N.; Wilhelm, M.R.; Habte-Tsion, H.-M.; Chimwamurombe, P.; Omoregie, E. Dietary garlic (Allium sativum) crude polysaccharides supplementation on growth, haematological parameters, whole body composition and survival at low water pH challenge in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) juveniles. Sci. Afr. 2019, 5, e00128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akbary, P.; Negahdari Jafarbeigi, Y.; Sondakzehi, A. Effects of garlic (Allium sativum L) extract on growth, feed utilization and carcass composition in Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) larvae. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2016, 15, 552–557. [Google Scholar]
  30. Talpur, A.D.; Ikhwanuddin, M. Dietary effects of garlic (Allium sativum) on haemato-immunological parameters, survival, growth, and disease resistance against Vibrio harveyi infection in Asian sea bass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch). Aquaculture 2012, 364–365, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nya, E.J.; Austin, B. Use of garlic, Allium sativum, to control Aeromonas hydrophila infection in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis. 2009, 32, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Güroy, D.; Emre, N.; Yalım, F.B.; Karadal, O.; Kaya, D.; Arifoğlu, N. Interaction of dietary garlic (Allium sativum), onion (Allium cepa), and probiotic on the growth performance and health status of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 4515–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karimi Pashaki, A.; Ghasemi, M.; ZorriehZahra, M.J.; Shrif Rohani, M.; Hosseini, S.M. Effects of dietary garlic (Allium sativum) extract on survival rate, blood and immune parameters changes and disease resistance of Common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio Linnaeus, 1758) against Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC). IFRO 2020, 19, 1024–1039. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ahmadniaye Motlagh, H.; Safari, O.; Selahvarzi, Y.; Baghalian, A.; Kia, E. Non-specific immunity promotion in response to garlic extract supplemented diets in female Guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghehdarijani, M.S.; Hajimoradloo, A.; Ghorbani, R.; Roohi, Z. The effects of garlic-supplemented diets on skin mucosal immune responses, stress resistance and growth performance of the Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus) fry. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 49, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sahu, S.; Das, B.K.; Mishra, B.K.; Pradhan, J.; Sarangi, N. Effect of Allium sativum on the immunity and survival of Labeo rohita infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2007, 23, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sharma, N.; Behl, T.; Singh, S.; Bansal, A.; Singh, S.K.; Zahoor, I. Expatiating the therapeutic profile of garlic (Allium sativum): A bench to bedside approach. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 14225–14239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chitmanat, C.; Tongdonmuan, K.; Nunsong, W. The use of crude extracts from traditional medicinal plants to eliminate Trichodina sp. in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2005, 27, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  39. Adineh, H.; Harsij, M.; Jafaryan, H.; Asadi, M. The effects of microencapsulated garlic (Allium sativum) extract on growth performance, body composition, immune response and antioxidant status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) juveniles. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muahiddah, N.; Diamahesa, W.A. The use of garlic (Allium sativum) as an immunostimulant in aquaculture. J. Fish Health 2023, 3, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Magouz, F.; Abu-Ghanima, H.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Gewaily, M.S.; Soliman, A.; Amer, A.A.; Moustafa, E.M.; Younis, E.M.; Abdel-Warith, A.-W.A.; Davies, S.J.; et al. Dietary Bacillus subtilis relieved the growth retardation, hepatic failure, and antioxidative depression induced by ochratoxin A in Thinlip Mullet (Liza ramada). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 22, 100984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gisbert, E.; Giménez, G.; Fernández, I.; Kotzamanis, Y.; Estévez, A. Development of digestive enzymes in common dentex Dentex dentex during early ontogeny. Aquaculture 2009, 287, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Au–Cupp-Enyard, C. Sigma’s Non-specific Protease Activity Assay–Casein as a Substrate. JoVE 2008, e899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Basuini, M.F.; Zalat, R.Y.I.; El-Hais, A.M.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Gewaily, M.; Gabr, S.A.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Dossou, S.; Teiba, I.I.; et al. Bee venom enhances performance and immune function in thinlip mullet: A promising approach for sustainable aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 151, 109713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paoletti, F.; Mocali, A. [18] Determination of superoxide dismutase activity by purely chemical system based on NAD(P)H oOxidation. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 186, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Carlberg, I.; Mannervik, B. [59] Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 1985, 113, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lygren, B.; Hjeltnes, B.; Waagbø, R. Immune response and disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed three levels of dietary vitamin E and the effect of vaccination on the liver status of antioxidant vitamins. Aquac. Int. 2001, 9, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El Basuini, M.F.; Zaki, M.A.A.; El-Hais, A.M.; Elhanafy, M.G.; El-Bilawy, E.H.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Abdel-Aziz, M.F.A.; Abouelsaad, I.A.; El-Ratel, I.T.; Mzengereza, K.; et al. Microbial, immune and antioxidant responses of Nile tilapia with dietary nano-curcumin supplements under chronic low temperatures. Aquac. Fish. 2024, 9, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Anderson, D.; Siwicki, A. Basic Hematology and Serology for Fish Health Programs. 1995. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:68117060 (accessed on 24 September 2024).
  51. Yano, T. Assay of hemolytic complement activity. Tech. Fish Immunol. 1992, 131–141. Available online: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1574231875535834880 (accessed on 24 September 2024).
  52. Bancroft, J.D.; Gamble, M. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gewaily, M.S.; Abumandour, M.M.A. Gross morphological, histological and scanning electron specifications of the oropharyngeal cavity of the hooded crow (Corvus cornix pallescens). Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2021, 50, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. More, S.J. European perspectives on efforts to reduce antimicrobial usage in food animal production. Ir. Vet. J. 2020, 73, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, J.-Y.; Gao, Y. Review of the Application of Garlic, Allium sativum, in Aquaculture. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2012, 43, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bisen, P.; Emerald, M. Nutritional and therapeutic potential of garlic and onion (Allium sp.). Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 12, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nakamoto, M.; Kunimura, K.; Suzuki, J.I.; Kodera, Y. Antimicrobial properties of hydrophobic compounds in garlic: Allicin, vinyldithiin, ajoene and diallyl polysulfides. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1550–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mnayer, D.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S.; Petitcolas, E.; Hamieh, T.; Nehme, N.; Ferrant, C.; Fernandez, X.; Chemat, F. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Six Essentials Oils from the Alliaceae Family. Molecules 2014, 19, 20034–20053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gong, X.; Su, X.; Liu, H. Diallyl Trisulfide, the Antifungal Component of Garlic Essential Oil and the Bioactivity of Its Nanoemulsions Formed by Spontaneous Emulsification. Molecules 2021, 26, 7186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gao, Y.; Wang, B.; Qin, G.; Liang, S.; Yin, J.; Jiang, H.; Liu, M.; Li, X. Therapeutic potentials of allicin in cardiovascular disease: Advances and future directions. Chin. Med. 2024, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Shang, A.; Cao, S.-Y.; Xu, X.-Y.; Gan, R.-Y.; Tang, G.-Y.; Corke, H.; Mavumengwana, V.; Li, H.-B. Bioactive Compounds and Biological Functions of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Foods 2019, 8, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Soltan, M.; El-L, S. Effect of probiotics and some spices as feed additives on the performance and behaviour of the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2008, 12, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zare, M.; Tran, H.Q.; Prokešová, M.; Stejskal, V. Effects of Garlic Allium sativum Powder on Nutrient Digestibility, Haematology, and Immune and Stress Responses in Eurasian Perch Perca fluviatilis Juveniles. Animals 2021, 11, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Inoue, L.A.K.A.; Oliveira Maciel, P.; Gusmão Affonso, E.; de Lima Boijink, C.; Tavares-Dias, M. Growth, parasitic infection and hematology in Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818 fed diets containing Allium sativum. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2016, 32, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Samson, J. Effect of garlic (Allium sativum) supplemented diets on growth, feed utilization and survival of red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2019, 15, 637–644. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ndong, D.; Fall, J. The effect of garlic (Allium sativum) on growth and immune responses of hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus x Oreochromis aureus). J. Clin. Immnunol. Immunopathol. Res. 2011, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  67. Onomu, A.J. Growth and haematological response of Clarias gariepinus to garlic (Allium sativum) supplemented diet. Sustain. Agric. Res. 2018, 8, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mattos, D.C.; Manhães, J.; Cardoso, L.; Aride, P.; Lavander, H.; Oliveira, A.; Radael, M.; Azevedo, R.; Junior, V. Influence of garlic extract on larval performance and survival of juvenile angelfish Pterophyllum scalare during transport. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 83, e244480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Breidt, F.; McFeeters, R.F.; Perez-Diaz, I.; Lee, C.-H. Fermented Vegetables. Food Microbiol. 2012, 841–855. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1128/9781555818463.ch33 (accessed on 24 September 2024).
  70. Nya, E.J.; Austin, B. Dietary modulation of digestive enzymes by the administration of feed additives to rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum. Aquac. Nutr. 2011, 17, e459–e466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Platel, K.; Rao, A.; Saraswathi, G.; Srinivasan, K. Digestive stimulant action of three Indian spice mixes in experimental rats. Food/Nahr. 2002, 46, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Esmaeili, N.; Abedian Kenari, A.; Rombenso, A.N. Effects of fish meal replacement with meat and bone meal using garlic (Allium sativum) powder on growth, feeding, digestive enzymes and apparent digestibility of nutrients and fatty acids in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, 1792). Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shehata, A.I.; Soliman, A.A.; Ahmed, H.A.; Gewaily, M.S.; Amer, A.A.; Shukry, M.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Evaluation of different probiotics on growth, body composition, antioxidant capacity, and histoarchitecture of Mugil capito. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Abdel-Latif, H.M.R.; Soliman, A.A.; Gewaily, M.S.; Amer, A.A.; Shukry, M.; Khalil, R.H.; Shehata, A.I. Dietary effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Allium sativum on growth, antioxidant status, hepatic and intestinal histoarchitecture, expression of growth- and immune-related genes, and resistance of Oreochromis niloticus to Aeromonas sobria. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 148, 109493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Adibmoradi, M.; Navidshad, B.; Seifdavati, J.; Royan, M. Effect of Dietary Garlic Meal on Histological Structure of Small Intestine in Broiler Chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 43, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Agbebi, O.; Ogunmuyiwa, T.; Herbert, S. Effect of dietary garlic source on feed utilization, growth and Histopathology of the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mohammad, M.A. Effect of adding garlic Allium sativum powder in diet on hematological, biochemical and histopathological criteria of common carp Cyprinus carpio L. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 54, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Camargo, M.M.; Martinez, C.B. Histopathology of gills, kidney and liver of a Neotropical fish caged in an urban stream. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2007, 5, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Öz, M.; Inanan, B.E.; Üstüner, E.; Karagoz, B.; Dikel, S. Effects of dietary garlic (Allium sativum) oil on growth performance, haemato-biochemical and histopathology of cypermethrin-intoxicated Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Vet. Med. Sci. 2024, 10, e1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ciji, A.; Akhtar, M.S. Stress management in aquaculture: A review of dietary interventions. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 2190–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, D.H.; Lim, S.R.; Ra, C.S.; Kim, J.D. Effects of Dietary Garlic Extracts on Whole Body Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition, Muscle Free Amino Acid Profiles and Blood Plasma Changes in Juvenile Sterlet Sturgeon, Acipenser ruthenus. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Thomson, M.; Ali, M. Garlic [Allium sativum]: A review of its potential use as an anti-cancer agent. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2003, 3, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kumar, G.R.; Reddy, K.P. Reduced nociceptive responses in mice with alloxan induced hyperglycemia after garlic (Allium sativum Linn.) treatment. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 37, 662–666. [Google Scholar]
  84. Padiya, R.; Khatua, T.N.; Bagul, P.K.; Kuncha, M.; Banerjee, S.K. Garlic improves insulin sensitivity and associated metabolic syndromes in fructose fed rats. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ademiluyi, A.O.; Oboh, G.; Owoloye, T.R.; Agbebi, O.J. Modulatory effects of dietary inclusion of garlic (Allium sativum) on gentamycin–induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 3, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vazquez-Prieto, M.A.; Rodriguez Lanzi, C.; Lembo, C.; Galmarini, C.R.; Miatello, R.M. Garlic and Onion Attenuates Vascular Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Fructose-Fed Rats. J. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 1, 475216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gholipour Kanani, H.; Nobahar, Z.; Kakoolaki, S.; Jafarian, H. Effect of ginger- and garlic-supplemented diet on growth performance, some hematological parameters and immune responses in juvenile Huso huso. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 40, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ravi, S.; Jitender, K. Fish Biology and Ecology Theory: Circulatory System of Fish; University College of Sciences, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India, 2005; p. 347.
  89. Nwabueze, A.A. The effect of garlic (Allium sativum) on growth and haematological parameters of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Sustain. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abdelwahab, A.M.; El-Bahr, S.M.; Al-Khamees, S. Influence of Dietary Garlic (Allium sativum) and/or Ascorbic Acid on Performance, Feed Utilization, Body Composition and Hemato-Biochemical Parameters of Juvenile Asian Sea Bass (Lates calcarifer). Animals 2020, 10, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Öz, M.; DİKel, S. Effect of garlic (Allium sativum)—Supplemented diet on growth performance, body composition and fatty acid profile of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Cell. Mol. Biol. 2022, 68, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jia, R.; Hou, Y.; Feng, W.; Nomingerel, M.; Li, B.; Zhu, J. Multi-Omics Analysis to Understand the Effects of Dietary Proanthocyanidins on Antioxidant Capacity, Muscle Nutrients, Lipid Metabolism, and Intestinal Microbiota in Cyprinus carpio. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Warshafsky, S.; Kamer, R.S.; Sivak, S.L. Effect of garlic on total serum cholesterol: A meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 1993, 119, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Okoro, B.C.; Dokunmu, T.M.; Okafor, E.; Sokoya, I.A.; Israel, E.N.; Olusegun, D.O.; Bella-Omunagbe, M.; Ebubechi, U.M.; Ugbogu, E.A.; Iweala, E.E.J. The ethnobotanical, bioactive compounds, pharmacological activities and toxicological evaluation of garlic (Allium sativum): A review. Pharmacol. Res. Mod. Chin. Med. 2023, 8, 100273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Salehi, B.; Zucca, P.; Orhan, I.E.; Azzini, E.; Adetunji, C.O.; Mohammed, S.A.; Banerjee, S.K.; Sharopov, F.; Rigano, D.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; et al. Allicin and health: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Arreola, R.; Quintero-Fabián, S.; López-Roa, R.I.; Flores-Gutiérrez, E.O.; Reyes-Grajeda, J.P.; Carrera-Quintanar, L.; Ortuño-Sahagún, D. Immunomodulation and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Garlic Compounds. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 401630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nawaz, N.; Wen, S.; Wang, F.; Nawaz, S.; Raza, J.; Iftikhar, M.; Usman, M. Lysozyme and Its Application as Antibacterial Agent in Food Industry. Molecules 2022, 27, 6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zaefarian, A.; Yeganeh, S.; Adhami, B. Dietary effects of garlic powder (Allium sativum) on growth, blood indices, carcass composition, and lysozyme activity in brown trout (Salmo caspius) and resistance against Yersinia ruckeri infection. Aquac. Int. 2017, 25, 1987–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jahanjoo, V.; Yahyavi, M.; Akrami, R.; Bahri, A.H. Influence of adding garlic (Allium sativum), Ginger (Zingiber officinale), thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and their combination on the growth performance, haematoimmunological parameters and disease resistance to Photobacterium damselae in sobaity sea bream (Sparidentex hasta) Fry. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2018, 18, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dash, S.; Das, S.; Samal, J.; Thatoi, H. Epidermal mucus, a major determinant in fish health: A review. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2018, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Firmino, J.P.; Fernández-Alacid, L.; Vallejos-Vidal, E.; Salomón, R.; Sanahuja, I.; Tort, L.; Ibarz, A.; Reyes-López, F.E.; Gisbert, E. Carvacrol, Thymol, and Garlic Essential Oil Promote Skin Innate Immunity in Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Through the Multifactorial Modulation of the Secretory Pathway and Enhancement of Mucus Protective Capacity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 633621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ighodaro, O.; Akinloye, O. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alex. J. Med. 2018, 54, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Winterbourn, C.C. Biological chemistry of superoxide radicals. ChemTexts 2020, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, J.; Guo, W.; Yang, M.; Liu, L.; Huang, S.; Tao, L.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y. Investigation of the dynamic changes in the chemical constituents of Chinese “Laba” garlic during traditional processing. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 41872–41883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Adegbola, P.I.; Fadahunsi, O.S.; Ajilore, B.S.; Akintola, A.O.; Olorunnisola, O.S. Combined ginger and garlic extract improves serum lipid profile, oxidative stress markers and reduced IL-6 in diet induced obese rats. Obes. Med. 2021, 23, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mohebbi, A.; Nematollahi, A.; Dorcheh, E.E.; Asad, F.G. Influence of dietary garlic (Allium sativum) on the antioxidative status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Res. 2012, 43, 1184–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Histomicrograph of Liza ramada intestine in the control (A) and other treated groups by garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (B,C) and fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (D,E). The morphological examination revealed normal intact structure of intestinal mucosa and wall in all groups with increased length and branching of intestinal villi (green arrowhead) as well as increased number of goblet cells (blue arrowhead) in line with supplemented garlic or fermented garlic in the fish diet. Immune cell infiltration (yellow arrowhead) was prominent near the villous crypts with fermented garlic at 2% (E). Stain H&E. Bar = 100 µm.
Figure 1. Histomicrograph of Liza ramada intestine in the control (A) and other treated groups by garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (B,C) and fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (D,E). The morphological examination revealed normal intact structure of intestinal mucosa and wall in all groups with increased length and branching of intestinal villi (green arrowhead) as well as increased number of goblet cells (blue arrowhead) in line with supplemented garlic or fermented garlic in the fish diet. Immune cell infiltration (yellow arrowhead) was prominent near the villous crypts with fermented garlic at 2% (E). Stain H&E. Bar = 100 µm.
Fishes 09 00401 g001
Figure 2. Histomicrograph of Liza ramada liver in the control (A) and other treated groups by garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (B,C) and fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (D,E). The morphological appearance revealed normal structure, including hepatocytes (green arrowhead), central veins (blue arrowhead), and bile duct (yellow arrowhead). There is an increased glycogen deposit with fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2%, in addition to periductal and perivascular accumulation of melanomacrophages (yellow arrowhead). Stain H&E. Bar = 100 µm.
Figure 2. Histomicrograph of Liza ramada liver in the control (A) and other treated groups by garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (B,C) and fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2% (D,E). The morphological appearance revealed normal structure, including hepatocytes (green arrowhead), central veins (blue arrowhead), and bile duct (yellow arrowhead). There is an increased glycogen deposit with fermented garlic powder at levels of 1 and 2%, in addition to periductal and perivascular accumulation of melanomacrophages (yellow arrowhead). Stain H&E. Bar = 100 µm.
Fishes 09 00401 g002
Figure 3. Lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity, respiratory burst (Nitro-blue Tetrazolium, NBT), and serum alternative complement pathway (ACP) in the serum of Liza ramada fed the experimental diets for 60 days. The letters a, b, c, d and ab denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between experimental treatments.
Figure 3. Lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity, respiratory burst (Nitro-blue Tetrazolium, NBT), and serum alternative complement pathway (ACP) in the serum of Liza ramada fed the experimental diets for 60 days. The letters a, b, c, d and ab denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between experimental treatments.
Fishes 09 00401 g003
Figure 4. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) of Liza ramada fed the experimental diets for 60 days. The letters a, b, and c denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between experimental treatments.
Figure 4. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) of Liza ramada fed the experimental diets for 60 days. The letters a, b, and c denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between experimental treatments.
Fishes 09 00401 g004aFishes 09 00401 g004b
Table 1. Basal diet constituents and proximate composition.
Table 1. Basal diet constituents and proximate composition.
Ingredients%Proximate Analysis
Fish meal (65% CP)12Crude protein (%)33.42 ± 0.21
Soybean meal (44% CP)38Crude lipids (%)7.99 ± 0.27
Gluten6Fiber (%)5.11 ± 0.21
Yellow corn20Ash (%)7.44 ± 0.22
Wheat bran11Gross energy (MJ/Kg) 218.22 ± 0.33
Rice bran7
Fish oil 4
Mineral premix 10.5
Vitamin premix 10.5
Dicalcium phosphate1
Total100
1 Vitamin and mineral mixtures described by Magouz et al. [41]. 2 The gross energy was multiplied using the values of 23.6 kJ/g for protein, 39.5 kJ/g for lipid, and 17.2 kJ/g for carbohydrates.
Table 2. Organosulfur compounds in fermented and non-fermented garlic powder.
Table 2. Organosulfur compounds in fermented and non-fermented garlic powder.
Compound (mg/g)Garlic PowderFermented Garlic Powder
Allicin (mg/g)3.20.1
Diallyl sulfide (DAS) (mg/g)0.92.1
Diallyl disulfide (DADS) (mg/g)1.64.8
S-allyl cysteine (mg/g)4.95.1
Table 3. Growth variables, feed efficacy, and survival rate of Liza ramada fed test diets for 60 days.
Table 3. Growth variables, feed efficacy, and survival rate of Liza ramada fed test diets for 60 days.
ItemExperimental Diets
ControlGarlic 1%Garlic 2%Fermented Garlic 1%Fermented Garlic 2%
Initial body weight (IBW, g)86.25 ± 0.2086.08 ± 0.3186.08 ± 0.1285.81 ± 0.3885.78 ± 0.21
Final body weight (FBW, g)225.43 ± 2.93 b243.50 ± 2.08 a246.31 ± 4.67 a247.35 ± 3.90 a248.15 ± 4.33 a
Weight gain (WG, %)139.18 ± 3.05 b157.42 ± 1.95 a160.23 ± 4.56 a161.53 ± 3.54 a162.37 ± 4.40 a
Specific growth rate (SGR, %/day)1.60 ± 0.03 b1.73 ± 0.01 a1.75 ± 0.03 a1.77 ± 0.02 a1.77 ± 0.03 a
Feed intake (g)228.93 ± 2.37 b239.26 ± 1.84 a239.64 ± 4.04 a239.22 ± 3.73 a239.97 ± 3.41 a
Feed conversion ratio (FCR)1.65 ± 0.05 a1.52 ± 0.01 b1.50 ± 0.02 b1.48 ± 0.03 b1.48 ± 0.04 b
Survival rate (SR, %)97.78 ± 2.22100.00 ± 0.0097.78 ± 2.22100.00 ± 0.00100.00 ± 0.00
Results are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Digestive enzyme of Liza ramada fed experimental diets for 60 days.
Table 4. Digestive enzyme of Liza ramada fed experimental diets for 60 days.
Enzyme Activity
(U/ mg)
Experimental Diets
ControlGarlic 1%Garlic 2%Fermented
Garlic 1%
Fermented
Garlic 2%
Amylase11.71 ± 0.64 b15.85 ± 1.09 a15.89 ± 1.10 a16.35 ± 1.08 a16.44 ± 1.21 a
Lipase18.95 ± 0.94 b23.19 ± 0.75 a24.34 ± 1.55 a24.22 ± 1.08 a24.49 ± 1.36 a
Protease15.77 ± 0.62 b20.23 ± 0.82 a20.22 ± 1.29 a20.04 ± 0.75 a20.26 ± 1.36 a
Results are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Blood biochemical indices of Liza ramada fed test diets for 60 days.
Table 5. Blood biochemical indices of Liza ramada fed test diets for 60 days.
ItemsExperimental Diets
ControlGarlic 1%Garlic 2%Fermented Garlic 1%Fermented Garlic 2%
Glucose (mg/dL)114.00 ± 5.20 a93.67 ± 4.26 b92.00 ± 4.00 b91.67 ± 2.60 b88.00 ± 3.46 b
Total protein (g/dL)5.10 ± 0.37 b6.68 ± 0.70 a6.69 ± 0.40 a6.76 ± 0.55 a6.82 ± 0.25 a
Globulin (g/dL)3.48 ± 0.254.97 ± 0.694.90 ± 0.385.03 ± 0.575.09 ± 0.51
Albumin (g/dL)1.62 ± 0.311.71 ± 0.061.79 ± 0.061.73 ± 0.031.74 ± 0.34
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)13.33 ± 1.2010.33 ± 1.4510.00 ± 1.1510.00 ± 1.539.00 ± 1.15
Triglyceride (mg/dL)65.67 ± 3.7667.67 ± 3.4868.00 ± 8.1969.33 ± 7.1370.00 ± 7.23
ALT (IU/L)54.67 ± 4.2656.67 ± 3.2857.67 ± 4.8161.33 ± 5.4660.67 ± 5.36
AST (IU/L)56.00 ± 4.3657.00 ± 4.7356.00 ± 5.8657.67 ± 7.2254.67 ± 5.81
Urea (mg/dL)10.00 ± 0.5810.33 ± 0.8811.00 ± 1.539.33 ± 1.869.67 ± 1.45
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.27 ± 0.070.27 ± 0.030.30 ± 0.100.23 ± 0.090.30 ± 0.12
Results are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Basuini, M.F.E.; Shaban, M.M.E.A.; El-Hais, A.M.; Soliman, A.A.; Abu-Elala, N.M.; Teiba, I.I.; Alhoshy, M.; Sallam, G.R.; Shadrack, R.S.; Mzengereza, K.; et al. Exploring the Dual Benefits of Fermented and Non-Fermented Garlic Powder on Growth, Antioxidative Capacity, Immune Responses, and Histology in Gray Mullet (Liza ramada). Fishes 2024, 9, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9100401

AMA Style

Basuini MFE, Shaban MMEA, El-Hais AM, Soliman AA, Abu-Elala NM, Teiba II, Alhoshy M, Sallam GR, Shadrack RS, Mzengereza K, et al. Exploring the Dual Benefits of Fermented and Non-Fermented Garlic Powder on Growth, Antioxidative Capacity, Immune Responses, and Histology in Gray Mullet (Liza ramada). Fishes. 2024; 9(10):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9100401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basuini, Mohammed F. El, Mahasen M. E. A. Shaban, Abdelaziz M. El-Hais, Ali A. Soliman, Nermeen M. Abu-Elala, Islam I. Teiba, Mayada Alhoshy, Ghada R. Sallam, Ronick Spenly Shadrack, Kumbukani Mzengereza, and et al. 2024. "Exploring the Dual Benefits of Fermented and Non-Fermented Garlic Powder on Growth, Antioxidative Capacity, Immune Responses, and Histology in Gray Mullet (Liza ramada)" Fishes 9, no. 10: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9100401

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop