Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Fishing Ground Prediction Using Asymmetric Spatiotemporal Scales: A Case Study of Ommastrephes bartramii
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Interactive Effects of High Salinity and Stocking Density on the Growth and Stress Physiology of the Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A Review

by
Srirengaraj Vijayaram
1,
Einar Ringø
2,*,
Hamed Ghafarifarsani
3,
Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar
4,
Saman Ahani
5 and
Chi-Chung Chou
1,*
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, 145 Xingda Rd., Taichung 40227, Taiwan
2
Norwegian College of Fishery Science, Faculty of Bioscience, Fisheries, and Economics, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
3
Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia 57561-51818, Iran
4
Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan 49189-43464, Iran
5
School of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Karaj 31499-68111, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2024, 9(2), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020063
Submission received: 8 December 2023 / Revised: 26 January 2024 / Accepted: 27 January 2024 / Published: 1 February 2024

Abstract

:
The utilization of algae in aquaculture is environmentally friendly, safe, and cost-effective and can effectively substitute for fish meal and fish oil in aquatic feeds. Incorporating algae as dietary supplements leads to significant enhancements in aquatic animals’ health and also improves the aquatic ecosystem. Algae are rich sources of nutrients and serve as the foundational food source in the aquatic food chain. Currently, 40 different algae species are employed in aquaculture. Furthermore, algae contributes to elevating the overall quality of aquatic feed products. Aquaculture stands as the most vital food production sector globally; however, challenges such as infection outbreaks and aquatic environmental pollution pose significant threats to the sustainable growth of this industry. An alternative strategy for mitigating environmental issues and improving aquatic production involves the utilization of algae. The novelty in the applications of algae in aquaculture stems from their multifaceted roles and benefits, such as their capacity to improve water quality, serve as nutrient-rich feed supplements, and enhance the overall health and productivity of aquatic species. These versatile applications of algae represent a fresh and innovative approach to sustainable aquaculture practices. This review furnishes insights into the use of algae, algae extracts, or components derived from algae to enhance water quality. Additionally, it covers the utilization of algae-based feed supplements, boosting of the immune system, enhanced growth performance, and disease resistance in aquatic animals.
Key Contribution: Algae are naturally rich nutrient sources; they are the primary food producer in the food chain for aquatic animal life, and the algae cultivation method is eco-friendly, non-toxic, and cost-effective. They have numerous beneficial properties, including immunostimulant, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activity in aquatic animals, and microalgae convert atmospheric carbon into high-nutrient products. Algae improve the circular bioeconomy in the aquaculture industry, and the algae treatment process is a successful method for different types of wastewater from municipal, industrial, agro-industrial, and livestock sources. Both microalgae and macroalgae as well as algae-producing components like carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins are beneficial substances in aquatic feeds and improve the quality of aqua feed, aquatic animal health, and the aquatic environment.

1. Introduction

The aquaculture sector plays a crucial role in global food production and holds significant economic importance for many countries. Both finfish farming and crustacean production contribute substantially to the global food supply chain, providing essential protein sources and supporting livelihoods. As the global population continues to grow, the aquaculture sector is expected to play an increasingly important role in meeting the demand for nutritious and sustainable protein sources. Sustainable and responsible aquaculture practices are critical for the long-term health of the industry and the environment [1]. Aquatic feeds typically play a crucial role in augmenting aquatic production, with a substantial portion of fish oil (FO) and fish meal (FM) being used as essential feed ingredients to meet the dietary requirements of farmed aquatic species. Consequently, there is a growing imperative to re-evaluate the sustainability of fish farming regarding the consumption of FM and FO [2]. The utilization of algal technology in aquaculture offers a range of benefits and represents an alternative approach to enhancing various biological functions. Algae, including microalgae and macroalgae, can serve multiple purposes in aquaculture systems, contributing to improved health and environmental conditions. The application of algal technology in aquaculture aligns with the goals of sustainability, environmental stewardship, and improved efficiency within the industry. Research and ongoing developments continue to explore innovative ways to integrate algal technologies for the benefit of both aquaculture production and the surrounding ecosystems [3]. Algae, including brown algae (Phaeophyceae), green algae (Chlorophyceae), red algae (Rhodophyceae), and diatoms (Bacillariophyceae), can be broadly categorized into two primary types: microalgae and macroalgae. The distinction between microalgae and macroalgae is primarily based on size, with microalgae being microscopic and macroalgae being visible without the aid of a microscope. Both microalgae and macroalgae play important roles in aquatic ecosystems and have various applications in industries, ranging from food and agriculture to biotechnology and environmental management [4]. The distinctive or combined effects of various algae species contribute to the consistency of protein, lipids, and essential trace minerals in aquaculture. Some of the commonly used algae species include Tetraselmis sp., Pavlova sp., Chlorella sp., Isochrysis sp., Chaetoceros sp., Phaeodactylum sp., Skeletonema sp., Thalassiosira sp., and Nannochloropsis sp. [5]. Microalgae, as a diverse group of photosynthetic microorganisms, have played crucial roles (photosynthetic evolution, primary producers, formation of planktonic ecosystems, biodiversity, carbon fixation, nitrogen fixation, symbiotic relationships, biogeochemical cycling, and adaptation to diverse environments) in the evolutionary history of life on Earth. While their exact evolutionary timeline is complex and not fully understood, microalgae have significantly contributed to the development and maintenance of ecosystems. Understanding the evolutionary roles of microalgae is crucial not only for elucidating the history of life on Earth but also for recognizing their ongoing ecological importance in contemporary ecosystems and their potential applications in various industries, such as bioenergy, food, and environmental management. Microalgae are indeed recognized as an essential and indispensable source of nutrition for fish fry and larval shrimp in aquaculture. In the context of aquaculture, particularly in hatcheries where controlled conditions are maintained for the early stages of fish and shrimp development, microalgae are considered a key component in ensuring successful and healthy aquaculture production. [6]. Sivaramakrishnan et al. [7] reported that four green algae, Acetabularia acetabulum, Enteromorpha, Halimeda macroloba, and Halimeda tuna, exhibit significant potential in terms of antioxidant capabilities, immune stimulation, and medicinal applications for aquatic animals. Algae represent vital natural food sources for aquatic animals, and various algae species, such as Leptolyngbya valderiana, L. tenuis, Arthrospira maxima, Navicula minima, Nostoc ellipsosporum, Cytoseira, Ulva, Pavlova, Chaetoceros, Porphyridium, Chlorella, Palmaria, Gracilaria, and Isochrysis, are promising feed components, enhancing the growth performance and immunity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax), golden gourami (Trichopodus trichopterus), cichlid (Cichlidae) fish, wag swordtail (Xiphophorus hellerii), orange molly pink zebra, tetras (Paracheirodon axelrodi), and prawns (Dendrobranchiata). Therefore, algae biomass serves as a cost-effective, safe, and environmentally friendly feed ingredient [8], and administrations of microalgae directly to the rearing water or indirectly by mixing them into the feed has become a crucial practice for enhancing aquatic animal nutrition [9,10,11]. Both micro- and macroalgae are advantageous components in aqua feeds, as they contribute to improving feed quality, aquatic animal health, and the aquatic environment [12].
Microalgal components offer not only beneficial effects for aquatic animals but also significant economic and ecological advantages in aquaculture [13]. Microalgal biomass contains a variety of biochemical components, such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, natural antioxidants, and bioactive products, and these diverse components are harnessed to develop sustainable aquaculture [14]. Microalgae supplements have been shown to enhance the growth performance of aquatic animals, and they synthesize a wide array of beneficial biological elements, including amino acids, vitamins, antioxidants, and pigments, which are advantageous for the health and growth of aquatic animals [15,16]. Compounds generated by macroalgae, particularly polysaccharides, can up-regulate the immune system and enhance protection against Aeromonas hydrophila, Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Proteus sp. [17]. Astaxanthin synthesized by algae enhances antioxidant activity in rainbow trout and offers beneficial effects for human health [18,19,20]. Furthermore, the inclusion of algae and their various biomolecules, proteins, peptides, amino acids, fatty acids, sterols, polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, phenolic compounds, photosynthetic pigments, vitamins, and minerals collectively contribute significantly to the growth performance, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial activity, serving as immune-stimulating agents in both aquatic animals and humans [21,22].
Algae are reported to exhibit antibacterial properties against a wide range of bacteria, encompassing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains [23,24]. Various algal species synthesize antimicrobial compounds such as short-chain and long-chain fatty acids, which are effective against pathogenic bacteria, including Vibrio species, Aeromonas species, and Pseudomonas species, as well as viruses, including influenza B, mumps viruses, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), and even the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) [25]. Algae-synthesized polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and sterols, have microbicidal effects against several bacteria, including Gram-positive strains like Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, as well as Gram-negative genera such as Aeromonas, Pseudomonas, and Vibrio [26,27,28,29,30].
Microalgae cultivation is used in aquaculture wastewater treatment [31,32], as it can improve water quality [33]. Five marine microalgae strains, Porphyridium aerugineum, Nannochloropsis granulate, Tetraselmis chuii, Botryococcus braunii, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, can produce varying levels of essential minerals, including calcium (ranging from 0.26% to 2.99%), phosphorus (0.73% to 1.46%), magnesium (0.26% to 0.71%), potassium (0.67% to 2.39%), sodium (0.81% to 2.66%), and sulfur (0.41% to 1.38%). These microalgae strains produce a total of 26 different chemical compounds, and their biomass plays an important role in carbon dioxide (CO2) conversion, nutrient recycling, land cultivation, and the remediation of wastewater, demonstrating their significance in environmental recycling [34,35,36,37]. The use of algae grown on wastewater for aquafeed applications involves several regulatory aspects (wastewater quality standards, nutrient content and composition, microbial safety, toxic substances, harmful algal blooms, feed safety regulations, environmental impact assessment, labeling and documentation, approval and certification, traceability and record keeping, and public health and consumer safety), which need to be considered to ensure both the safety of the aquafeed and the protection of the environment. Regulatory frameworks can vary by country, and specific guidelines may be provided by relevant authorities. Below are some general regulatory considerations. It is essential for individuals or companies engaged in the production of aquafeed using algae grown on wastewater to familiarize themselves with the specific regulations applicable in their region and to work closely with relevant regulatory authorities to ensure compliance. Additionally, seeking certification from reputable organizations may enhance the credibility and market acceptance of such products [37,38]. The present review aims to provide an overview of recent findings and applications related to the use of both micro- and macroalgae in aquaculture, including the use of macro- and microalgal extracts as functional feed additives as reported by Monteiro et al. [39] and the introduction of innovative approaches that can contribute to the development of sustainable aquaculture.

2. Cultivation Process

The cultivation of algae is the process of growing algae for various purposes, including food production, biofuel, bioremediation, and pharmaceuticals. Algae can be cultivated in open ponds, closed bioreactors, or photobioreactors [40]. The cultivation process involves the following elements: strain selection, growth medium, cultivation system, light and temperature, aeration and mixing, harvesting, and processing. Algae cultivation has gained attention as a sustainable and environmentally friendly way to produce a wide range of products with industrial applications, including biofuel production, food and feed production, wastewater treatment, and pharmaceuticals. Additionally, algae cultivation can contribute to carbon capture and reduce greenhouse gas emissions when used for biofuel production, and as a sustainable and versatile practice, algae cultivation has garnered interest in research and industry for its potential to contribute to a range of sectors. Advances in cultivation technologies and the exploration of novel algal strains continue to shape the field, making algae cultivation a promising solution for addressing global challenges related to food security, environmental sustainability, and renewable energy production [41,42,43,44]. In addition, it is worth mentioning that Silkina et al. [45] displayed that far-red light adaptation improved phycocyanin, a pigmented protein complex, and xanthophyll concentrations compared to white-light conditions in the thermophilic cyanobacteria Chlorogloeopsis fritschii.

3. Wastewater Management in Aquaculture

Aquaculture produces substantial volumes of wastewater, which contains nutrients, organic substances, and living organisms. The wastewater contents can vary, influenced by factors such as the species cultivated, the type of feed utilized, and the methods employed for water management [42,43,45,46]. The use of algal cultivation for the enhancement of water quality, especially in reducing Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), involves considerations of scale application efficiency (system design, nutrient loading rates, algal species selection, harvesting, and recirculation system), commercial exploitation (nutrient recovery, aquaculture and agriculture, research and development, public and private partnerships), and regulatory aspects (water quality standards, environmental permits, biosafety and health regulations, monitoring and reporting, land use regulations, and product safety). By addressing the scale application efficiency, commercial exploitation, and regulatory aspects, the integration of algal cultivation for water quality improvement can be more effectively implemented and sustained over time. Collaboration with regulatory bodies and adherence to standards are crucial for the successful and responsible deployment of algae-based water treatment solutions [32]. Microalgae cultivation has the potential to improve aquaculture wastewater, as it can affect the excess amount of nutrients such as ammonia, nitrate, phosphate, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in order to enhance water quality. This removal not only benefits water quality but also mitigates the environmental impact of nutrient-rich effluents when discharged. The harvested microalgae biomass can serve as a valuable feed source for aquaculture species, or it can be utilized for various other purposes, making it a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for both wastewater treatment and resource utilization in the aquaculture industry [32,47]. Effective management of aquaculture wastewater is imperative to mitigate the detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems. Employing efficient waste capture, water treatment, and recycling systems can significantly decrease the discharge of pollutants. In addition, regulatory measures and adherence to regulation are crucial for ensuring the long-term environmental sustainability of aquaculture operations [38,48,49]. Algal biomasses serve a dual purpose in enhancing the nutritional value of aquatic feed supplements, contributing to both environmental sustainability and the efficient utilization of aquaculture resources [50]. The use of algal technology for removing excess nutrients and dissolved carbon from wastewater is not a recent development; it was first suggested in the 1950s and has since evolved and gained prominence as an environmentally friendly and effective method for wastewater treatment and resource re-utilization [51,52,53,54]. Microalgae removes biological matter from wastewater through processes like consumption, adsorption, and biodegradation through microalgae’s production of extracellular polymers, which can detoxify or modify pollutants [55,56,57,58]. The microalgae Chlorella vulgaris has shown impressive efficiency in removing total nitrogen (86.1%) and phosphorus (82.7%) from white-leg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) farming wastewater [59]. Furthermore, C. vulgaris demonstrated superior growth in aquaculture wastewater when bicarbonate was used as the carbon source, underscoring its potential for efficient nutrient removal [60]. The microalgae Scenedesmus sp. is effective in removing pollutants from wet market wastewater, removing 74.8% of total nitrogen (TN) and 92.2% of total phosphorus (TP) [61]. The microalgae Spirulina sp. is also utilized for treating aquaculture wastewater and reducing environmental impact [48].
Microalgae biomass and its components, including astaxanthin, phycocyanin, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and PUFAs, are effectively employed to remove eutrophication pollutants from wastewater. The biomass of microalgae species like Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Monoraphidium griffithii, and Selenastrum sp. can be cultivated and recirculated for use in treating and improving aquaculture wastewater [62]. The use of the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in an aquaculture estuary revealed significant effectiveness in nutrient removal, as it showed removal rates of 75.6% for ammonium, 84.5% for nitrates, 73.3% for phosphates, and 71.9% for chemical oxygen demand (COD). [46]. The cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris from Nile tilapia effluents showed impressive results in terms of reducing nutrient levels and bioremediation efficiency. Microalgae biomass produces an average nutrient level of 172.91 mg/day for carbohydrates, 141.57 mg/day for proteins, and 150.19 mg/day for lipids. Furthermore, it achieved exceptional bioremediation efficiency, removing 99.8% of nitrate and 99.7% of phosphate from the tilapia effluents. These findings highlight the potential use of C. vulgaris in water quality control [63]. Cultivation of Spirulina platensis in aquaculture wastewater also demonstrated a similar beneficial effect [64,65]. The use of different algal species in combination has also been revealed to be effective in bioremediation and biomass production [66,67,68]. Cultivating microalgae in an aquaponic system proves beneficial to both fish and plants. Integrated fish and vegetable farming supports sustainable aquaculture and hydroponic plant growth in a mutually beneficial ecosystem [69,70,71] (Table 1).

4. Applications of Algae in Aquaculture

4.1. Replacements of Fish Meal and Fish Oil

Algae, particularly microalgae, are essential natural nutritional sources in aquatic ecosystems and play an important role in the food chain of aquatic animals. The beneficial effects include improved growth performance, modulation of gut microbiota, and enhanced disease resistance, making them valuable for the aquaculture industry. Furthermore, the substitutions of FM and FO with microalgae contribute to the conservation of marine ecosystems [74,75,76]. Dietary additives of algae have demonstrated effectiveness as immunomodulators by enhancing survival rates of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) exposed to Edwardsiella tarda [77]. Micro- and macroalgae used as a feed supplement have demonstrated positive effects on the green water culture production of various planktivorous species, including Nile tilapia, rohu (Labeo rohita), bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), catla (Catla catla), and shrimp. Microalgae such as Arthrospira (Spirulina), Chlorella, Dunaliella, Haematococcus, Isochrysis, Nannochloropsis, Pavlova, and Schizochytrium have established themselves as essential nutritional sources, with benefits for aquatic animals [5,18].

4.1.1. Microalgae

In a previous review, Duerr et al. [78] discussed the use of the microalgae Chaetoceros, Thalassiosira, Tetraselmis, Isochrysis, and Nannochloropsis as aquaculture feeds, through Artemia, rotifers, or Daphnia. The dietary inclusion of microalgae supplements represents an innovative and sustainable approach in aquaculture and has garnered increasing attention as an alternative to FM and FO in commercial aquatic feed, enhancing the nutritional value of the feed and promoting environmental sustainability in aquaculture [79,80,81], which moves the industry closer to achieving sustainable aquaculture [82]. Microalgae species such as Chlorella, Dunaliella, Nannochloropsis, Spirulina, and Scenedesmus are commonly used in aquaculture as feed supplements to improve the health and growth performance of aquatic animals [83]. The combination of algae extracts and organic acids has the potential to partially or completely replace FM and FO in aquafeed [84]. Biomass from species like Dunaliella spp. can serve as a valuable ingredient in aquaculture feeds, particularly for Nile tilapia, and its incorporation can partially replace FM, leading to improved growth and nutrient intake in the cultured species. This practice supports the development of a more sustainable and environmentally friendly aquaculture industry by reducing the dependency on traditional protein sources and promoting resource efficiency [85]. In a subsequent study, it was reported that the incorporation (10%) of Dunaliella sp. in Nile tilapia diets is safe and economically beneficial, as the additive improved fish health and growth performance and reduced the supplementation levels of FO and FM in the diets. This aligns with sustainability goals in aquaculture, emphasizing the responsible use of resources and reducing the reliance on traditional feed ingredients [5].

4.1.2. Macroalgae

The incorporation of macroalgae as a feed additive in an 8-week feeding trial at a dosage of 1000 mg led to significant improvements in growth, antioxidant capacity, and pigmentation in electric yellow cichlid (Labidochromis caeruleus) [78]. The combination of dietary supplements containing macroalgae species such as Ulva spp., Gracilaria spp., and Fucus spp. at concentrations ranging from 2.5% to 7.5% yielded several positive effects in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). One of the significant outcomes is the potential to replace traditional feed ingredients FM and FO [86]. The incorporation of algae supplements not only enhances the health and performance of aquaculture species but also contributes to making aquaculture practices more sustainable by reducing the industry’s reliance on marine resources. This aligns with the growing emphasis on environmentally responsible aquaculture [84,85,87]. In a previous study with Nile tilapia, the dietary effect of ulvan extract from the green algae Ulva clathrata revealed that administration increased hematocrit, phagocytic activity, and white blood cells. However, no significant effect was displayed for growth performance, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, total serum protein, albumin, and globulin in the dietary levels as a result of the ulvan extract [87,88] (Figure 1, Table 2).

4.2. Treatment of Aquatic Animal Diseases

The administration of microalgae meal in a 70-day feeding trial with post larval stage of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) revealed significant positive impact on disease resistance against V. harveyi infection and various immune parameters, total hemocyte count, phenoloxidase activity, superoxide dismutase activity, and bactericidal activity [109,110,111,112]. Polysaccharides derived from the tropical brown algae Turbinaria ornata demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against A. hydrophila, P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus sp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Enterobacter sp., Proteus sp., V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, and E. coli. These findings displayed the potential of algae-derived compounds in combating bacterial infections and promoting the health of aquatic animals [111,113,114,115]. Various techniques are available for the extraction of polysaccharides from seaweeds, including hot water extraction, enzymatic-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasonic-assisted extraction. Each of these methods has advantages and may be chosen based on the specific requirements of the polysaccharide extraction process [112,116]. Scenedesmus quadricauda, a green alga, is not only a good antioxidant but has also demonstrated bactericidal activity against bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, the biomass of S. quadricauda is a rich source of protein, making it suitable for use as a feed supplement in aquatic animal’s diets and is a valuable resource for enhancing the nutritional quality of the feeds and promoting health and growth of aquatic species [117]. The dietary incorporation of microalgae such as Sargassum cinereum, Padina gymnospora, and Gracillaria folifera has demonstrated significant antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas spp. in Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), and these species are important due to their antibacterial and antiviral properties [118,119]. The dietary incorporation of P. gymnospora polysaccharide at various concentrations (0.01, 0.1, and 1.0%) showed that inclusion at 0.1% and 1.0% levels increased the production of antibodies and improved the resistance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) against A. hydrophila and E. tarda. This highlights the potential of P. gymnospora polysaccharides as a beneficial dietary supplement by enhancing the immune response and disease resistance in aquatic species [120]. The dietary inclusion of various algae compounds, including polysaccharides, fatty acids, phlorotannins, pigments, lectins, alkaloids, terpenoids, and halogenated compounds, significantly enhanced the antioxidant capacity, immune response, survival rate, and infection resistance against pathogens in Mozambique tilapia [113,121]. Supplements of Azolla pinnata and Nannochloropsis oculata, used in the remediation of environmental pollutants are reported to improve antioxidant capacity, growth performance, immune system function, survival rates, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia [114]. The combination of dietary additives of Chlorella and Spirulina has demonstrated protective effects against A. hydrophila infection in Nile tilapia as these algae-based additives improved the immune response and disease resistance of the fish, contributing to their health and survival [122]. In contrast, dietary supplementation of Dunaliella salina at a dosage of 300 mg/kg for 8 weeks did not lead to changes in phenoloxidase activity and hemocyte count, but administration increased protection against White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) in juvenile black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) compared to control groups. This suggests that D. salina supplementation may not have direct effects on certain immune parameters but can still enhance the shrimp’s resistance to specific pathogens like WSSV [9].

4.3. Growth Promoters

The dietary incorporation of Spirulina sp. at levels ranging from 5% to 15% in a 60-day feeding trial involving juvenile giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) resulted in enhanced growth performance, reduced mortality, and significantly improved feed utilization. This indicates the potential of Spirulina sp. as a valuable dietary supplement for improving the health and overall production efficiency of the prawns in aquaculture [96]. Spirulina used as a feed supplement is known to be a valuable protein source, and in common carp, its inclusion in the diet has revealed improved growth and increased body weight by more than 25% vs. the control group. [93,123]. The dietary incorporation of Spirulina at levels ranging from 5% to 20% significantly enhanced the survival rate, growth, and feed intake of juvenile Pacific white shrimp and revealed a positive impact on the health and production efficiency of shrimp in aquaculture [124]. In an 11-week study using juvenile Pacific white shrimp, the partial replacement of FM with S. platensis resulted in a significantly improved growth response. This suggests that incorporating S. platensis into the diet can be an effective strategy to enhance the growth performance of shrimp in aquaculture and reduce the dependency of FM [6,100]. The dietary incorporation of the microalgae Scenedesmus almeriensis at various combinations (ranging from 0% to 39%) in a 45-day experiment had a significant positive impact on the growth, body composition, gut microbiota composition, and production of short-chain fatty acids in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) juveniles [125]. The single or combined dietary inclusion of Isochrysis galbana, Pavlova lutheri, and Chaetoceros muelleri significantly enhanced the growth performance and survival of grooved carpet shell (Ruditapes decussatus) larvae well as the biochemical and fatty acid composition during the larval development and underscore the value of algae-based dietary supplements in promoting the health and development of aquatic larvae in aquaculture [10]. The dietary incorporation of the macroalgae Gracilaria arcuata as feed supplement, 10, 20 and 30% to African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) revealed significantly lower growth, feed utilization, feed intake, and protein efficient ratio at 20 and 30% inclusion vs. control group and 10% inclusion [126]. In contrast, a later study, using G. arcuata at different levels (20, 40, and 60%) in a 12-week trial with Nile tilapia led to a 20% improvement in growth, enhanced body composition, and increased feed intake compared to control-fed fish [127,128]. In a 60-day feeding trial, the use of flocculated algae-enriched live feed Artemia franciscana resulted in improved growth, survival rates, maintenance of gut microbiota composition, increased villi length, enhanced digestive enzyme activities, improved feed conversion ratio, feed consumption ratio, and better nutrition indices compared to the control group and indicated that the use of algae-enriched live feed can have multiple beneficial effects on the growth, health, and overall performance of catla [129]. Dietary incorporation of different algae or single alga such as A. pinnata, C. vulgaris, S. platensis, and Scenedesmus spp., as well as their extracts, are revealed to be nutrient-rich feed sources for aquatic animals. These feed supplements can partially replace FO and FM, as they significantly improve antioxidant capacity, immune response, nutrient utilization, body weight, and growth performance of aquatic animals and highlight the potential of algae-based feed supplements by enhancing health and production of aquatic species [95,115,130]. Dietary inclusion of the microalgae Pyropia yezoensis extract at different combinations (ranging from 0 to 20 g/kg) in a 9-week feeding trial with olive flounder revealed that a 15% dietary inclusion notably enhanced weight gain, feed efficiency, and immunity and increased the level of PUFAs [92]. Dietary supplementation of red seaweed (Gracilaria pygmaea) at a level of 90 g/kg (GL-90) significantly improved the growth performance of rainbow trout fry [131]. However, the supplementation did not reveal a significant effect on antioxidant responses and digestive activities. Dietary inclusion of 3% Arthrospira platensis significantly improved the growth of Nile tilapia, but administration did not modulate the gut microbiota [132]. Dietary additives of microalgae Spirulina and Schizochytrium, used as replacements for FM, FO or plant oil, significantly improved fish growth and maintained fillet quality and displayed the potential of using these microalgae as sustainable alternatives in aquafeeds to enhance fish growth and the quality of fillets while reducing reliance on traditional protein sources like FM and FO [133]. Dietary supplementation of Sargassum ilicifolium (10%) during an eight-week feeding trial with great sturgeon revealed several positive effects, including enhanced growth performance, hematological parameters (red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), and hemoglobin levels), immune responses (respiratory bursts, complementary activities, and immunoglobulin M, lysozyme, and serum total protein levels), and defense against Y. ruckeri and highlight the potential of S. ilicifolium as a valuable dietary supplement for improving the health and growth performance of great sturgeon [134]. Dietary inclusion of macroalgae Gracilaria vermiculophylla at a level of 5% in a 91-day feeding trial improved the growth performance of rainbow trout, enhanced the innate immune response, and resulted in the highest peroxidase, complement, and lysozyme activity [135]. Dietary incorporation of fucoidan-rich algae Sargassum wightii extract at various concentrations (1, 2, 3, and 6%) in a 45-day trial experiment using sutchi catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fingerlings showed that dietary supplementation at 2% notably reduced stress levels, increased the survival rate against A. hydrophila, and enhanced immune parameters such as lysozyme activity and respiratory burst activity [136,137]. In a study with Nile tilapia, brown algae Padina pavonica was administrated at 2, 4, 6, and 8 g/kg for 45 days, and growth was improved at 8 g/kg inclusion [138]. Furthermore, the study revealed higher values of hematological and biochemical parameters with the 8 g/kg inclusion diet.

4.4. Immunostimulants

Algae feed supplements in aquatic animals play an important role in enhancing the immune system and infection resistance against viral pathogens. These supplements contain various bioactive compounds and nutrients that can bolster health and promote the disease resistance of aquatic animals [139,140,141]. Dietary incorporation of algae-derived astaxanthin at a concentration of 80 mg/kg improved hemolymph immunological indices, including total hemocyte counts, phagocytic activity of hemocytes, serum anti-superoxide radical activity, serum phenoloxidase activity, serum antibacterial activity, and serum bacteriolytic activity and disease resistance against WSSV, in Pacific white shrimp during a 4-week trial [142], showing the immunomodulatory and disease resistance-enhancing properties of astaxanthin derived from algae. Dietary incorporation of 5% S. platensis and Cladophora in a 60-day experiment significantly improved the immune system response in various fish species, including Nile tilapia, rainbow trout, channel catfish, and great sturgeon [143,144,145,146]. This improvement was evidenced by changes in parameters such as RBC and WBC counts, serum bacterial activity, phagocytosis, and lysozyme activity. In addition to immune system enhancement, the dietary supplementation also led to improved growth performance and infection resistance in these fish species, highlighting the potential of algae-based dietary supplements in enhancing the overall health and disease resistance of various fish species. In an 8-week feeding trial, dietary incorporation of Laurencia caspica extract at a concentration of 1.5% significantly improved the immune system of rainbow trout by improving immune gene expression, including IL-1β, lysozyme II, Complement C3, and TNF-α [147]. Furthermore, the supplementation of L. caspica extracts improved resistance towards A. hydrophila infection. A recent study by Khanzadeh et al. [148] revealed significantly higher effects of L. caspica extract on immunoglobulin M and complement 3 as well as increased activity of alkaline phosphatase and alanine aminotransferase in Nile tilapia. Furthermore, extract administration considerably improved the survival of the fish challenged with Streptococcus agalactia. Dietary supplementation of sulphated polysaccharides derived from green algae, specifically Codium fragile, resulted in the upregulation of immune-related gene expression in olive flounder, increased expression of genes associated with the immune response, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-8, and enhanced lysozyme activity [149,150]. The dietary supplementation of green microalgae Chlorella vulgaris (10%) in a Nile tilapia diet revealed several beneficial effects, particularly when the fish was exposed to arsenic, as the supplementation resulted in enhanced serum biomarkers such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine, and urea [151]. Additionally, the immune gene expression was significantly upregulated, with TNF-α increasing 14-fold, TGF-β1 increasing 13-fold, and IL-1β increasing 7-fold, indicating the algae’s ability to mitigate the negative impact of arsenic exposure in Nile tilapia [152]. Regarding the administration of S. platensis, a recent study [105] revealed that the supplementation in a Nile tilapia diet improved interleukin 10, lysozyme activity, complement 3, and IgM serum levels, as well as survival against A. hydrophila infection.

4.5. Rotifers and Algae

According to Gilbert [153], rotifers are subdivided into four categories as defined by types of food ingested: (1) nanoplankton, (2) microplankton, (3) 5–50 µm algae, and (4) 5–250 µm algae. Larval rearing of marine fish, for example, turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), can result in a bottleneck, and at this early life stage, it is important to transfer essential nutrients from algae to live food [154]. The reference to Yan et al. [155] likely provides valuable insights into the specific methodologies, experimental setups, and findings related to using rotifers for toxicity testing of harmful algae. Authors interested in this topic can benefit from consulting these papers to gain a deeper understanding of the experimental protocols, data interpretation, and potential applications of rotifer-based toxicity testing in the context of harmful algal blooms.

5. Conclusions

Microalgae have garnered attention for their potential benefits in aquaculture, contributing to various aspects of fish health and overall industry sustainability (as a growth enhancer, immunostimulant, antioxidant, and source of disease resistance). Incorporating microalgae into aquaculture practices aligns with the broader goals of sustainable and responsible aquaculture, addressing both economic and environmental considerations [155,156,157,158,159]. Microalgae in aquaculture practices offer a holistic approach to water quality management, nutrient cycling, and environmental sustainability. These organisms contribute to creating a more balanced and self-regulating aquatic ecosystem within aquaculture systems [160]. Consequently, microalgae play a pivotal role in supporting the early life stages of aquatic organisms in aquaculture. Their nutritional content, suitability for larviculture, and contribution to sustainable feed production make them a valuable component in the cultivation of various species, ultimately contributing to the overall success and sustainability of aquaculture operations [133,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188] and contributing to the conservation of marine biodiversity. Microalgae also help alleviate the pressure on wild fisheries, support lower trophic levels, and reduce the ecological footprint of aquaculture operations, all of which are essential for maintaining the health and diversity of marine ecosystems. Another benefit of microalgae via biotechnology is decrease in the production cost by producing biomass using wastewater under the phytoremediation process. Microalgae’s phytoremediation capabilities offer a cost-effective and sustainable solution for managing aquaculture wastewater. Microalgae biomass offers a wide range of positive impacts on aquaculture, spanning from the improvement of aquatic animal health to enhancing the quality of aqua feeds and wastewater treatment. It is important to note that specific regulations can vary between region and country. Aquaculture operators and scientists should be aware of and comply with local regulations to promote the responsible and environmentally friendly use of algae in aquaculture. The use of algae and algae-derived components in aquaculture is indeed a promising avenue for the future, contributing to more sustainable and environmentally responsible practices while simultaneously improving aquatic feed quality and animal health. This aligns with the growing emphasis on responsible and ethical food production, essential for meeting the increasing global demand for seafood.

Author Contributions

S.V.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, literature search, table preparation. E.R.: writing—review and editing, manuscript outline, supervision. H.G.: writing—review and editing. S.H.H.: writing—review and editing, validation. S.A.: writing—review and editing. C.-C.C.: writing—review and editing, validation, supervision, manuscript outline. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Turchini, G.M.; Trushenski, J.T.; Glencross, B.D. Thoughts for the future of aquaculture nutrition: Realigning perspectives to reflect contemporary issues related to judicious use of marine resources in aquafeeds. N. Am. J. Aquacult. 2019, 81, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. In Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; p. 200. [Google Scholar]
  3. Charoonnart, P.; Purton, S.; Saksmerprome, V. Applications of microalgal biotechnology for disease control in aquaculture. Biology 2018, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Markou, G.; Angelidaki, I.; Georgakakis, D. Microalgal carbohydrates: An overview of the factors influencing carbohydrates production, and of main bioconversion technologies for production of biofuels. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shah, M.R.; Lutzu, G.A.; Alam, A.; Sarker, P.; Kabir Chowdhury, M.A.; Parsaeimehr, A.; Liang, Y.; Daroch, M. Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Spolaore, P.; Joannis-Cassan, C.; Duran, E.; Isambert, A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sivaramakrishnan, T.; Swain, S.; Saravanan, K.; Sankar, K.; Roy, S.D.; Biswas, L. In vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity and chemometric approach to reveal their variability in green macroalgae from south Andaman Coast of India. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017, 17, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mukherjee, P.; Pal, R. Algae as antioxidants and effective fish feed. a review. Afr. J. Fish. Sci. 2021, 9, 001–003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reitan, K.I.; Rainuzzo, J.R.; Øie, G.; Olsen, Y. A review of the nutritional effects of algae in marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 1997, 155, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aranda-Burgos, J.A.; da Costa, F.; Nóvoa, S.; Ojea, J.; Martínez-Patiño, D. Effects of microalgal diet on growth, survival, biochemical and fatty acid composition of Ruditapes decussatus larvae. Aquaculture 2014, 420–421, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, F.; Leng, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zhou, W. The application of microalgae biomass and bio-products as aquafeed for aquaculture. Algal Res. 2021, 60, 102541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Hai, N. The use of medicinal plants as immunostimulants in aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture 2015, 446, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, L.; Wang, R.; Lu, Q.; Liu, H. “Algae aquaculture” integrating algae-culture with aquaculture for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Apandi, N.M.; Mohamed, R.M.S.R.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Kassim, A.H.M. Microalgal biomass production through phycoremediation of fresh market wastewater and potential applications as aquaculture feeds. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 3226–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ytrestøyl, T.; Struksnæs, G.; Rørvik, K.A.; Koppe, W.; Bjerkeng, B. Astaxanthin digestibility as affected by ration levels for Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquaculture 2006, 261, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, F.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zhou, W. Replacement of feed by fresh microalgae as a novel technology to alleviate water deterioration in aquaculture. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 20794–20800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marudhupandi, T.; Inbakandan, D. Polysaccharides in aquatic disease management. Fish. Aquacult. J. 2015, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guerin, M.; Huntley, M.E.; Olaizola, M. Haematococcus astaxanthin: Applications for human health and nutrition. TRENDS Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rahman, M.M.; Khosravi, S.; Chang, K.H.; Lee, S.M. Effects of dietary inclusion of astaxanthin on growth, muscle pigmentation and antioxidant capacity of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 21, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Biswas, A.; Araki, H.; Sakata, T.; Nakamori, T.; Takii, K. Optimum fish meal replacement by soy protein concentrate from soymilk and phytase supplementation in diet of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Aquaculture 2019, 506, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Özogul, Y.; Regenstein, J.M. Marine bioactive compounds and their health benefits: A review. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 446–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Monteiro, M.; Santos, R.A.; Iglesias, P.; Couto, A.; Serra, C.R.; Gouvinhas, I.; Barros, A.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P.; Díaz-Rosales, P. Effect of extraction method and solvent system on the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of selected macro- and microalgae extracts. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kolanjinathan, K.; Ganesh, P.; Govindarajan, M. Antibacterial activity of ethanol extracts of seaweeds against fish bacterial pathogens. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 13, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  24. Natrah, F.M.I.; Harah, Z.M.; Sidik, B.J.; Izzatul, N.M.S.; Syahidah, A. Antibacterial activities of selected seaweed and seagrass from port Dickson coastal water against different aquaculture pathogens. Sains Malays. 2015, 44, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Falaise, C.; François, C.; Travers, M.-A.; Morga, B.; Haure, J.; Tremblay, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pasetto, P.; Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial compounds from eukaryotic microalgae against human pathogens and diseases in aquaculture. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Benkendorff, K.; Davis, A.R.; Rogers, C.N.; Bremner, J.B. Free fatty acids and sterols in the benthic spawn of aquatic molluscs, and their associated antimicrobial properties. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2005, 316, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Austin, B.; Austin, D.A.; Munn, C.B. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease of Farmed and Wild Fish; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 26, p. 552. [Google Scholar]
  28. Desbois, A.P.; Mearns-Spragg, A.; Smith, V.J. A Fatty acid from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum is antibacterial against diverse bacteria including multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Mar. Biotechnol. 2009, 11, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kusumaningrum, H.P.; Zainuri, M. Detection of bacteria and fungi associated with Penaeus monodon post larvae mortality. Proc. Environ. Sci. 2015, 23, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thitamadee, S.; Prachumwat, A.; Srisala, J.; Jaroenlak, P.; Salachan, P.V.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Flegel, T.W.; Itsathitphaisarn, O. Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia. Aquaculture 2016, 452, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, F.; Li, C.; Yang, Z.-H.; Zeng, G.-M.; Feng, L.-J.; Liu, J.-Z.; Liu, M.; Cai, H.-W. Continuous microalgae cultivation in aquaculture wastewater by a membrane photobioreactor for biomass production and nutrients removal. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 92, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ansari, F.A.; Singh, P.; Guldhe, A.; Bux, F. Microalgal cultivation using aquaculture wastewater: Integrated biomass generation and nutrient remediation. Algal Res. 2017, 21, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, P.; Lu, Q.; Fan, L.; Zhou, W. A review on the use of microalgae for sustainable aquaculture. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tibbetts, S.M.; Milley, J.E.; Lall, S.P. Chemical composition and nutritional properties of freshwater and marine microalgal biomass cultured in photobioreactors. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 1109–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silva, B.F.; Wendt, E.V.; Castro, J.C.; de Oliveira, A.E.; Carrim, A.J.; Vieira, J.D.; Sassi, R.; da Costa Sassi, C.F.; da Silva, A.L.; de Oliveira Barboza, G.F.; et al. Analysis of some chemical elements in marine microalgae for biodiesel production and other uses. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yarnold, J.; Karan, H.; Oey, M.; Hankamer, B. Microalgal aquafeeds as part of a circular bioeconomy. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arun, J.; Raghu, R.; Hanif, S.S.M.; Thilak, P.G.; Sridhar, D.; Nirmala, N.; Pugazhendhi, A. A comparative review on photo and mixotrophic mode of algae cultivation: Thermochemical processing of biomass, necessity of bio-oil upgrading, challenges and future roadmaps. Appl. Energy 2022, 325, 119808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oladoja, N.A.; Adelagun, R.O.A.; Ahmad, A.L.; Ololade, I.A. Phosphorus recovery from aquaculture wastewater using thermally treated gastropod shell. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2015, 98, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Montero, M.; Lavrador, A.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Couto, A.; Carvalho, A.P.; Enes, P.; Diaz-Rosales, P. Macro- and microalgal extract as functional feed additives in diets for zebrafish juveniles. Acuacult. Res. 2021, 52, 6420–6433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, B.R.; Mathimani, T.; Sudhakar, M.P.; Rajendran, K.; Nizami, A.S.; Brindhadevi, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. A state of the art review on the cultivation of algae for energy and other valuable products: Application, challenges, and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Emerenciano, M.G.C.; Martínez-Córdova, L.R.; Martínez-Porchas, M.; Miranda-Baeza, A. Biofloc technology (BFT): A tool for water quality management in aquaculture. Water Qual. 2017, 5, 92–109. [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang, L.; Li, M.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Xu, W.; Du, B.; Wei, Q.; Wei, D. Spectroscopic characteristics of dissolved organic matter from aquaculture wastewater and its interaction mechanism to chlorinated phenol compound. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 263, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, X.-F.; Ye, G.-Y.; Yi, N.-K.; Lu, L.-J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.-Y.; Xiao, L.; Liu, J. Effect of plant physiological characteristics on the removal of conventional and emerging pollutants from aquaculture wastewater by constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 135, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tibbetts, S.M.; Yasumaru, F.; Lemos, D. In vitro prediction of the digestible protein content of marine microalgae (Nannochloropsis granulata) meals for Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Algal Res. 2017, 21, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silkina, A.; Kultschar, B.; Llewellyn, C.A. Far-red light acclimation for improved mass cultivation of cyanobacteria. Metabolites 2019, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guldhe, A.; Ansari, F.A.; Singh, P.; Bux, F. Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae using aquaculture wastewater: A biorefinery concept for biomass production and nutrient remediation. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 99, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, S.-B.; Xue, G.; Wang, B.-Z. Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and de-nitrification (SND) and its kinetics model in membrane bioreactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohedano, R.A.; Costa, R.H.R.; Tavares, F.A.; Belli Filho, P. High nutrient removal rate from swine wastes and protein biomass production by full-scale duckweed ponds. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rawat, I.; Ranjith Kumar, R.; Mutanda, T.; Bux, F. Dual role of microalgae: Phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3411–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oswald, W.J.; Gotaas, H.B. Photosynthesis in sewage treatment. Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 1957, 122, 73–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Delanka-Pedige, H.M.K.; Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.; Cornelius, J.; Henkanatte-Gedera, S.M.; Tchinda, D.; Zhang, Y.; Nirmalakhandan, N. Pathogen reduction in an algal-based wastewater treatment system employing Galdieria sulphuraria. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fatima, N.; Kumar, V.; Rawat, B.; Jaiswal, K. Enhancing algal biomass production and nutrients removal from municipal wastewater via a novel mini photocavity bioreactor. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10, 4714–4720. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fatima, N.; Kumar, V.; Jaiswal, K.; Vlaskin, M.; Gururani, P.; Kumar, S. Toxicity of cadmium (Cd) on microalgal growth, (IC50 value) and its exertions in biofuel production. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10, 5828–5833. [Google Scholar]
  54. Torres, M.A.; Barros, M.P.; Campos, S.C.G.; Pinto, E.; Rajamani, S.; Sayre, R.T.; Colepicolo, P. Biochemical biomarkers in algae and marine pollution: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 71, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, L.; Xiao, H.; He, N.; Sun, D.; Duan, S. Biosorption and biodegradation of the environmental hormone nonylphenol by four marine microalgae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sirakov, I.; Velichkova, K.; Stoyanova, S.; Staykov, Y. The importance of microalgae for aquaculture industry. Review. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2015, 2, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  57. Han, P.; Lu, Q.; Zhong, H.; Xie, J.; Leng, L.; Li, J.; Fan, L.; Li, J.; Chen, P.; Yan, Y.; et al. Recycling nutrients from soy sauce wastewater to culture value-added Spirulina maxima. Algal Res. 2021, 53, 102157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Velichkova, K.; Sirakov, I.; Stoyanova, S. Biomass production and wastewater treatment from aquaculture with Chlorella vulgaris under different carbon sources. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2014, 18, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jais, N.M.; Apandi, W.M.; Asma, W.; Matias Peralta, H.M. Removal of nutrients and selected heavy metals in wet market wastewater by using microalgae Scenedesmus sp. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 773, 1210–1214. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lu, Q.; Han, P.; Chen, F.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Leng, L.; Li, J.; Zhou, W. A novel approach of using zeolite for ammonium toxicity mitigation and value-added Spirulina cultivation in wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Stevčić, Č.; Pulkkinen, K.; Pirhonen, J. Screening of microalgae and LED grow light spectra for effective removal of dissolved nutrients from cold-water recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) wastewater. Algal Res. 2019, 44, 101681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tejido-Nuñez, Y.; Aymerich, E.; Sancho, L.; Refardt, D. Treatment of aquaculture effluent with Chlorella vulgaris and Tetradesmus obliquus: The effect of pretreatment on microalgae growth and nutrient removal efficiency. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 136, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wuang, S.C.; Khin, M.C.; Chua, P.Q.D.; Luo, Y.D. Use of Spirulina biomass produced from treatment of aquaculture wastewater as agricultural fertilizers. Algal Res. 2016, 15, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, H.; Zeng, F.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Gong, S.; Lv, X.; Liu, B. Spirulina active substance mediated gut microbes improve lipid metabolism in high-fat diet fed rats. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 59, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stockenreiter, M.; Haupt, F.; Seppälä, J.; Tamminen, T.; Spilling, K. Nutrient uptake and lipid yield in diverse microalgal communities grown in wastewater. Algal Res. 2016, 15, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Godwin, C.M.; Lashaway, A.R.; Hietala, D.C.; Savage, P.E.; Cardinale, B.J. Biodiversity improves the ecological design of sustainable biofuel systems. GCB Bioenergy 2018, 10, 752–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tossavainen, M.; Katyal Chopra, N.; Kostia, S.; Valkonen, K.; Sharma, A.K.; Sharma, S.; Ojala, A.; Romantschuk, M. Conversion of biowaste leachate to valuable biomass and lipids in mixed cultures of Euglena gracilis and chlorophytes. Algal Res. 2018, 35, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huo, S.; Liu, J.; Addy, M.; Chen, P.; Necas, D.; Cheng, P.; Li, K.; Chai, H.; Liu, Y.; Ruan, R. The influence of microalgae on vegetable production and nutrient removal in greenhouse hydroponics. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Costache, T.A.; Acién Fernández, F.G.; Morales, M.M.; Fernández-Sevilla, J.M.; Stamatin, I.; Molina, E. Comprehensive model of microalgae photosynthesis rate as a function of culture conditions in photobioreactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7627–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kumar, V.; Jaiswal, K.K.; Verma, M.; Vlaskin, M.S.; Nanda, M.; Chauhan, P.K.; Singh, A.; Kim, H. Algae-based sustainable approach for simultaneous removal of micropollutants, and bacteria from urban wastewater and its real-time reuse for aquaculture. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Roy, S.S.; Pal, R. Microalgae in aquaculture: A review with special references to nutritional value and fish dietetics. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2015, 68, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guerrero-Cabrera, L.; Rueda, J.A.; García-Lozano, H.; Navarro, A.K. Cultivation of Monoraphidium sp.; Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. algae in batch culture using Nile tilapia effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 161, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Marinho-Soriano, E.; Nunes, S.O.; Carneiro, M.A.A.; Pereira, D.C. Nutrients’ removal from aquaculture wastewater using the macroalgae Gracilaria birdiae. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Das, J.; Ghosh, K. Nutrient profiling of five freshwater algae for their prospective use as fish feed ingredients. Algae Res. 2023, 74, 103173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khatoon, N.; Sengupta, P.; Homechaudhuri, S.; Pal, R. Evaluation of algae based feed in Goldfish (Carassius auratus) nutrition. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2010, 63, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gunathilaka, B.E.; Veille, A.; Tharaka, K.; Shin, J.; Shin, J.; Jeong, J.-B.; Meallet, V.; Lee, K.-J. Evaluation of marine algal (Ulva spp./Solieria spp.) extracts combined with organic acids in diets for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquacult. Res. 2021, 52, 3270–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pezeshk, F.; Babaei, S.; Abedian Kenari, A.; Hedayati, M.; Naseri, M. The effect of supplementing diets with extracts derived from three different species of macroalgae on growth, thermal stress resistance, antioxidant enzyme activities and skin colour of electric yellow cichlid (Labidochromis caeruleus). Aquacult. Nutr. 2019, 25, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Duerr, E.O.; Molnar, A.; Sato, V. Cultured microalgae as aquacultured feeds. J. Mar. Biotechnol. 1998, 6, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  79. Tham, P.E.; Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Yap, Y.J.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Show, P.L. Insights of microalgae-based aquaculture feed: A review on circular bioeconomy and perspectives. Algal Res. 2023, 28, 103186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Norambuena, F.; Hermon, K.; Skrzypczyk, V.; Emery, J.A.; Sharon, Y.; Beard, A.; Turchini, G.M. Algae in fish feed: Performances and fatty acid metabolism in juvenile Atlantic salmon. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ahmad, M.T.; Shariff, M.; Md. Yusoff, F.; Goh, Y.M.; Banerjee, S. Applications of microalga Chlorella vulgaris in aquaculture. Rev. Aquacult. 2020, 12, 328–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Raja, R.; Shanmugam, H.; Ganesan, V.; Carvalho, I. Biomass from microalgae: An overview. Oceanography 2014, 2, 1. [Google Scholar]
  83. Peixoto, M.J.; Salas-Leitón, E.; Pereira, L.F.; Queiroz, A.; Magalhães, F.; Pereira, R.; Abreu, H.; Reis, P.A.; Gonçalves, J.F.M.; de Ozório, R.O.A. Role of dietary seaweed supplementation on growth performance, digestive capacity and immune and stress responsiveness in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquacult. Rep. 2016, 3, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhu, D.; Wen, X.; Xuan, X.; Li, S.; Li, Y. The green alga Ulva lactuca as a potential ingredient in diets for juvenile white spotted snapper Lutjanus stellatus Akazaki. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Attalla, R.; Mikhail, S. Effect of replacement of fish meal protein with boiled full fat soybean seeds and dried algae on growth performance, nutrient utilization and some blood parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2008, 12, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Passos, R.; Correia, A.P.; Pires, D.; Pires, P.; Ferreira, I.; Simões, M.; do Carmo, B.; Santos, P.; Pombo, A.; Afonso, C.; et al. Potential use of macroalgae Gracilaria gracilis in diets for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax): Health benefits from a sustainable source. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021, 119, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. del Rocio Quezada-Rodriguez, P.; Fajer-Avilla, E.J. The dietary effect of ulvan from Ulva clathrate on hematological-immunological parameters and growth of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Neori, A. “Green water” microalgae: The leading sector in world aquaculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Radhakrishnan, S.; Belal, I.E.; Seenivasan, C.; Muralisankar, T.; Bhavan, P.S. Impact of fishmeal replacement with Arthrospira platensis on growth performance, body composition and digestive enzyme activities of the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquacult. Rep. 2016, 3, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Ahmad, M.H. Live Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) as a growth and immunity promoter for Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), challenged with pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult. Res. 2009, 40, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Khani, M.; Soltani, M.; Mehrjan, M.S.; Foroudi, F.; Ghaeni, M. The effect of Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) microalga on some hematological and immune system parameters of Koi carp (Cyprinus carpio). Iran. J. Ichthyol. 2017, 4, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  92. Radhakrishnan, S.; Saravana Bhavan, P.; Seenivasan, C.; Shanthi, R.; Muralisankar, T. Replacement of fishmeal with Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris and Azolla pinnata on non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant activities of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. J. Basic Appl. Zool. 2014, 67, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Supamattaya, K.; Kiriratnikom, S.; Boonyaratpalin, M.; Borowitzka, L. Effect of a Dunaliella extract on growth performance, health condition, immune response and disease resistance in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Aquaculture 2005, 248, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wongprasert, K.; Rudtanatip, T.; Praiboon, J. Immunostimulatory activity of sulfated galactans isolated from the red seaweed Gracilaria fishery and development of resistance against white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in shrimp. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 36, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Younis, E.S.; Al-Quffail, A.S.; Al-Asgah, N.A.; Abdel-Warith, A.W.; Al-Hafedh, Y.S. Effect of dietary fish meal replacement by red algae, Gracilaria arcuata, on growth performance and body composition of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mansour, E.; Mounes, H.; Ahmed, K. Effect of Azolla pinnata and Nannochloropsis oculata on growth performance and immunoresponse of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and its resistance to bacterial infection. Egypt. J. Aquacult. 2020, 10, 43–62. [Google Scholar]
  97. Shahabuddin, A.M.; Khan, M.N.D.; Mikami, K.; Araki, T.; Yoshimatsu, T. Dietary supplementation of red alga Pyropia spheroplasts on growth, feed utilization and body composition of sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). Aquacult. Res. 2017, 48, 5363–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sivagnanavelmurugan, M.; Marudhupandi, T.; Palavesam, A.; Immanuel, G. Antiviral effect of fucoidan extracted from the brown seaweed, Sargassum wightii, on shrimp Penaeus monodon postlarvae against white spot syndrome virus. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2012, 43, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, Q.; Qiu, M.; Xu, W.; Gao, Z.; Shao, R.; Qi, Z. Effects of dietary administration of Chlorella on the immune status of gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 13, 3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nandeesha, M.C.; Gangadhar, B.; Varghese, T.J.; Keshavanath, P. Effect of feeding Spirulina platensis on the growth, proximate composition and organoleptic quality of common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Aquacult. Res. 1998, 29, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Knutsen, H.R.; Ottesen, O.H.; Palihawadana, A.M.; Sandaa, W.; Sørensen, M.; Hagen, Ø. Muscle growth and changes in chemical composition of spotted wolffish juveniles (Anarhichas minor) fed diets with and without microalgae (Scenedesmus obliquus). Aquacult. Rep. 2019, 13, 100175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hart, B.; Schurr, R.; Narendranath, N.; Kuehnle, A.; Colombo, S.M. Digestibility of Schizochytrium sp. whole cell biomass by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2021, 533, 736156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bélanger, A.; Sarker, P.K.; Bureau, D.P.; Chouinard, Y.; Vandenberg, G.W. Apparent digestibility of macronutrients and fatty acids from microalgae (Schizochytrium sp.) fed to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): A potential candidate for fish oil substitution. Animals 2021, 11, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Masha, B.; Moosavi, J.; Montajami, S. Assessment the effect of Spirulina platensis as supplemantal feed on growth performance and survival rate in angel fish (Pterophyllum scalare). J. Fish. Int. 2013, 8, 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  105. El-Araby, D.A.; Amer, S.A.; Attia, G.A.; Osman, A.; Fahmy, E.M.; Altohamy, D.E.; Tolba, S.A. Dietary Spirulina platensis phycocyanin improves growth, tissue histoarchitecture, and immune responses, with modulating immunoexpression of CD3 and CD20 in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lin, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; Qi, C. Effect of different levels of Spirulina platensis dietary supplementation on the growth, body color, digestion, and immunity of Trachinotus ovatus. Isr. J. Aquac. Bamidgeh 2016, 68, IJA_68.2016.1285. [Google Scholar]
  107. Vizcaíno, A.J.; Saéz, M.I.; López, G.; Arizcun, M.; Abellán, E.; Martínez, T.F.; Alarcón, F.J. Tetraselmis suecia and Tisochrysis lutea meal as dietary ingredients for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) fry. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 2843–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Akbary, P.; Aminikhoei, Z. Effect of water-soluble polysaccharide extract from the green alga Ulva rigida on growth performance, antioxidant enzyme activity, and immune stimulation of grey mullet Mugil cephalus. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yaakob, Z.; Ali, E.; Zainal, A.; Mohamad, M.; Takriff, M.S. An overview: Biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J. Biol. Res. 2014, 21, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Madeira, M.S.; Cardoso, C.; Lopes, P.A.; Coelho, D.; Afonso, C.; Bandarra, N.M.; Prates, J.A.M. Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: A review. Livest. Sci. 2017, 205, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nonwachai, T.; Purivirojkul, W.; Limsuwan, C.; Chuchird, N.; Velasco, M.; Dhar, A.K. Growth, nonspecific immune characteristics, and survival upon challenge with Vibrio harveyi in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) raised on diets containing algal meal. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 29, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yao, X.; Lin, Y.; Shi, M.; Chen, L.; Qu, K.; Liu, Y.; Xie, S. Effect of Schizochytrium limacinum supplementation to a low fish-meal diet on growth performance, lipid metabolism, apoptosis, autophagy and intestinal histology of Litopenaeus vannamei. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1090235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rajendran, P.; Subramani, P.A.; Michael, D. Polysaccharides from marine macroalga, Padina gymnospora improve the nonspecific and specific immune responses of Cyprinus carpio and protect it from different pathogens. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 58, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Goh, K.W.; Kari, Z.A.; Wee, W.; Zakaria, N.N.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Kabir, M.A.; Wei, L.S. Exploring the roles of phytobiotics in relieving the impacts of Edwardsiella tarda infection on fish: A mini-review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1149514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Badwy, T.M.; Ibrahim, E.; Zeinhom, M. Partial replacement of fishmeal with dried microalga (Chlorella spp. and Scenedesmus spp.) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Cairo, Egypt, 12–14 October 2008; pp. 801–810. [Google Scholar]
  116. Marudhupandi, T.; Kumar, T.T.A. Effect of fucoidan from Turbinaria ornata against marine ornamental fish pathogens. J. Coast. Life Med. 2013, 1, 282–286. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ren, B.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Fu, X.; You, L.; Liu, R.H. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of Sargassum thunbergii polysaccharides and its antioxidant and hypoglycemic activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 173, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Rodrigues, D.; Sousa, S.; Silva, A.; Amorim, M.; Pereira, L.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Duarte, A.C.; Freitas, A.C. Impact of enzyme- and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods on biological properties of red, brown, and green seaweeds from the central west coast of Portugal. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3177–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Al-Asgah, N.A.; Younis, E.-S.M.; Abdel-Warith, A.-W.A.; Shamlol, F.S. Evaluation of red seaweed Gracilaria arcuata as dietary ingredient in African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Arguelles, E. Proximate analysis, antibacterial activity, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of a green microalga Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turpin) Brébisson. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. 2018, 20, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  121. Thanigaivel, S.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A.; Thomas, J. Investigation of seaweed extracts as a source of treatment against bacterial fish pathogen. Aquaculture 2015, 448, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pérez, M.J.; Falqué, E.; Domínguez, H. Antimicrobial action of compounds from marine seaweed. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. El-Habashi, N.; Fadl, S.E.; Farag, H.F.; Gad, D.M.; Elsadany, A.Y.; El Gohary, M.S. Effect of using Spirulina and Chlorella as feed additives for elevating immunity status of Nile tilapia experimentally infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult. Res. 2019, 50, 2769–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nakagawa, H.; Gómez-Díaz, G. Usefulness of Spirulina sp. meal as feed additive for giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquacult. Sci. 1995, 43, 521–526. [Google Scholar]
  125. Güroy, B.; Şahin, İ.; Mantoğlu, S.; Kayalı, S. Spirulina as a natural carotenoid source on growth, pigmentation and reproductive performance of yellow tail cichlid Pseudotropheus acei. Aquacult. Int. 2012, 20, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Maghawri, A.; Marzouk, S.S.; Ezz El-Din, H.M.; Nashaat, M. Effect of brown algae Padina pavonica as a dietary supplement on growth performance and health status of cultured Oreochromis niloticus. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2023, 49, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hanel, R.; Broekman, D.; De Graaf, S.; Schnack, D. Partial replacement of fishmeal by lyophilized powder of the microalgae Spirulina platensis in Pacific white shrimp diets. Open Mar. Biol. J. 2007, 1, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hemaiswarya, S.; Raja, R.; Ravi Kumar, R.; Ganesan, V.; Anbazhagan, C. Microalgae: A sustainable feed source for aquaculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Vizcaíno, A.J.; López, G.; Sáez, M.I.; Jiménez, J.A.; Barros, A.; Hidalgo, L.; Camacho-Rodríguez, J.; Martínez, T.F.; Cerón-García, M.C.; Alarcón, F.J. Effects of the microalga Scenedesmus almeriensis as fishmeal alternative in diets for gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata, juveniles. Aquaculture 2014, 431, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kandathil Radhakrishnan, D.; Velayudhannair, K.; Schmidt, B.V. Effects of bio-flocculated algae on the growth, digestive enzyme activity and microflora of freshwater fish Catla catla (Hamilton 1922). Aquacult. Res. 2020, 51, 4533–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Maisashvili, A.; Bryant, H.; Richardson, J.; Anderson, D.; Wickersham, T.; Drewery, M. The values of whole algae and lipid extracted algae meal for aquaculture. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Choi, Y.H.; Lee, B.-J.; Nam, T.J. Effect of dietary inclusion of Pyropia yezoensis extract on biochemical and immune responses of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture 2015, 435, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sotoudeh, E.; Mardani, F. Antioxidant-related parameters, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal morphology in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry fed graded levels of red seaweed, Gracilaria pygmaea. Aquacult. Nutr. 2018, 24, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Plaza, I.; García, J.L.; Galán, B.; De la Fuente, J.; Bermejo-Poza, R.; Villarroel, M. Effect of Arthrospira supplementation on Oreochromis niloticus gut microbiota and flesh quality. Aquacult. Res. 2019, 50, 1448–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Trevi, S.; Uren Webster, T.; Consuegra, S.; Garcia de Leaniz, C. Benefits of the microalgae Spirulina and Schizochytrium in fish nutrition: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yeganeh, S.; Adel, M. Effects of dietary algae (Sargassum ilicifolium) as immunomodulator and growth promoter of juvenile great sturgeon (Huso huso Linnaeus, 1758). J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 2093–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Araújo, M.; Rema, P.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Cunha, L.M.; Peixoto, M.J.; Pires, M.A.; Seixas, F.; Brotas, V.; Beltrán, C.; Valente, L.M.P. Dietary inclusion of IMTA-cultivated Gracilaria vermiculophylla in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) diets: Effects on growth, intestinal morphology, tissue pigmentation, and immunological response. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Prabu, D.L.; Sahu, N.P.; Pal, A.K.; Dasgupta, S.; Narendra, A. Immunomodulation and interferon-gamma gene expression in sutchi catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus: Effect of dietary fucoidan rich seaweed extract (FRSE) on pre and post-challenge period. Aquacult. Res. 2016, 47, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Abdelhamid, A.F.; Ayoub, H.F.; Abd El-Gawad, E.A.; Abdelghany, M.F.; Abdel-Tawwab, M. Potential effects of dietary seaweeds mixture on the growth performance, antioxidant status, immunity response, and resistance of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) against Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021, 119, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Dawood, M.A.; Alagawany, M.; Faggio, C.; Nowosad, J.; Kucharczyk, D. Health benefits and potential applications of fucoidan (FCD) extracted from brown seaweeds in aquaculture: An updated review. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 122, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Trichet, V.V. Nutrition and immunity: An update. Aquacult. Res. 2010, 41, 356–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Barman, D.; Nen, P.; Mandal, S.C.; Kumar, V. Immunostimulants for aquaculture health management. J. Mar. Sci. Res. Dev. 2013, 3, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Carton-Kawagoshi, R.J.; Caipang, C.M. Algal-derived products and their role in shrimp immunity. In Biotechnological Advances in Shrimp Health Management in the Philippines. 2015, pp. 73–88. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Algal-derived-products-and-their-role-in-shrimp-Carton-Kawagoshi-Caipang/2531dde3db4fa5b6385eff75e198bb18e143edba (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  144. Wang, H.; Dai, A.; Liu, F.; Guan, Y. Effects of dietary astaxanthin on the immune response, resistance to white spot syndrome virus and transcription of antioxidant enzyme genes in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. IFRO 2015, 14, 699–718. [Google Scholar]
  145. Promya, J.; Chanagun, C. The effects of Spirulina platensis and Cladophora algae on the growth performance, meat quality, and immunity-stimulating capacity of the African sharp tooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  146. Ragap, H.M.; Khalil, R.H.; Mutawie, H.H. Immunostimulant effects of dietary Spirulina platensis on tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 2, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  147. Yeganeh, S.; Teimouri, M.; Amirkolaie, A.K. Dietary effects of Spirulina platensis on hematological and serum biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Res. Vet. Sci. 2015, 101, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Khanzadeh, M.; Beikzadeh, B.; Hoseinifar, S.H. The Effects of Laurencia caspica Algae Extract on Hemato-Immunological Parameters, Antioxidant Defense, and Resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Nutr. 2023, 4, 8882736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kiadaliri, M.; Firouzbakhsh, F.; Deldar, H. Effects of feeding with red algae (Laurencia caspica) hydroalcoholic extract on antioxidant defense, immune responses, and immune gene expression of kidney in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yang, Y.; Park, J.; You, S.G.; Hong, S. Immuno-stimulatory effects of sulfated polysaccharides isolated from Codium fragile in olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 87, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Goh, K.W.; Abdul Kari, Z.; Wee, W.; Van Doan, H.; Reduan, M.F.H.; Kabir, M.A.; Seong Wei, L. The roles of polysaccharides in carp farming: A review. Animals 2023, 13, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zahran, E.; Awadin, W.; Risha, E.; Khaled, A.A.; Wang, T. Dietary supplementation of Chlorella vulgaris ameliorates chronic sodium arsenite toxicity in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus as revealed by histopathological, biochemical and immune gene expression analysis. Fish. Sci. 2019, 85, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gilbert, J.J. Food niches of planktonic rotifers: Diversification and implications. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2022, 67, 2218–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ferreira, M.; Sousa, V.; Oliveira, B.; Canadas-Sousa, A.; Abreu, H.; Dias, J.; Valente, L.M. An in-depth characterisation of European seabass intestinal segments for assessing the impact of an algae-based functional diet on intestinal health. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Yan, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Han, G.; Zhou, M. Application of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in detecting the toxicity of harmful algae. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2009, 27, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wassef, E.A.; Saleh, N.E.; Abdel-Latif, H.M. Beneficial effects of some selected feed additives for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.): A review. Int. Aquat. Res. 2023, 15, 271–288. [Google Scholar]
  157. Øie, G.; Makridis, P.; Reitan, K.I.; Olsen, Y. Protein and carbon utilization of rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) in first feeding of turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquaculture 1997, 153, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, X.D.; Wang, X.Y.; Xu, M.E.; Jiang, Y.; Yan, T.; Wang, X.C. Progress on the usage of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in marine ecotoxicology. Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 229, 105678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Mendonça, A.J.C.D.; Rosas, V.T.; Monserrat, J.M.; Romano, L.A.; Tesser, M.B. The inclusion of algae Gracilaria domingensis in the diet of mullet juveniles (Mugil liza) improves the immune response. J. Appl. Aquacult. 2019, 31, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ma, K.; Chen, S.; Wu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Qiao, H.; Fan, J.; Wu, H. Dietary supplementation with microalgae enhances the zebrafish growth performance by modulating immune status and gut microbiota. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 773–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Bahi, A.; Ramos-Vega, A.; Angulo, C.; Monreal-Escalante, E.; Guardiola, F.A. Microalgae with immunomodulatory effects on fish. Rev. Aquacult. 2023, 15, 1522–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kashem, A.H.M.; Das, P.; AbdulQuadir, M.; Khan, S.; Thaher, M.I.; Alghasal, G.; Al-Jabri, H. Microalgal bioremediation of brackish aquaculture wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 873, 162384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Yazıcı, M.; Naz, M.; Mazlum, Y. A Review of the utilization of laminarin, alginate, and fucoidan polysaccharides from macroalgae for promoting growth performance and health in aquatic organisms. In Research & Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture; Gece Publishing: Ankara, Turkey, 2022; pp. 97–113. [Google Scholar]
  164. Abdelrhman, A.M.; Ashour, M.; Al-Zahaby, M.A.; Sharawy, Z.Z.; Nazmi, H.; Zaki, M.A.; Goda, A.M. Effect of polysaccharides derived from brown macroalgae Sargassum dentifolium on growth performance, serum biochemical, digestive histology and enzyme activity of hybrid red tilapia. Aquacult. Rep. 2022, 25, 101212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Abdulrahman, N.M. Evaluation of Spirulina spp. as food supplement and its effect on growth performance of common carp fingerlings. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2014, 2, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  166. Pradhan, B.; Bhuyan, P.P.; Ki, J.S. Immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anticancer, and pharmacokinetic activity of ulvan, a seaweed-derived sulfated polysaccharide: An updated comprehensive review. Mar. Drugs. 2023, 21, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. García-Márquez, J.; Domínguez-Maqueda, M.; Torres, M.; Cerezo, I.M.; Ramos, E.; Alarcón, F.J.; Balebona, M.C. Potential Effects of microalgae-supplemented diets on the growth, blood parameters, and the activity of the intestinal microbiota in Sparus aurata and Mugil cephalus. Fishes 2023, 8, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Arney, B.; Liu, W.; Forster, I.P.; McKinley, R.S.; Pearce, C.M. Feasibility of dietary substitution of live microalgae with spray-dried Schizochytrium sp. or Spirulina in the hatchery culture of juveniles of the Pacific geoduck clam (Panopea generosa). Aquaculture 2015, 444, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Bongiorno, T.; Foglio, L.; Proietti, L.; Vasconi, M.; Lopez, A.; Pizzera, A.; Parati, K. Microalgae from biorefinery as potential protein source for Siberian sturgeon (A. baerii) aquafeed. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Daneshvar, E.; Antikainen, L.; Koutra, E.; Kornaros, M.; Bhatnagar, A. Investigation on the feasibility of Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in a mixture of pulp and aquaculture effluents: Treatment of wastewater and lipid extraction. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 255, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Dang, V.T.; Li, Y.; Speck, P.; Benkendorff, K. Effects of micro and macroalgal diet supplementations on growth and immunity of greenlip abalone, Haliotis laevigata. Aquaculture 2011, 320, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Duy, N.D.Q.; Francis, D.S.; Southgate, P.C. The nutritional value of live and concentrated micro-algae for early juveniles of sandfish, Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 2017, 473, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, H.; Yan, S.; Mu, J. Microalgae cultivation using an aquaculture wastewater as growth medium for biomass and biofuel production. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, S85–S88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Hawrot-Paw, M.; Koniuszy, A.; Gałczyńska, M.; Zając, G.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J. Production of microalgal biomass using aquaculture wastewater as growth medium. Water 2019, 12, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hoshino, M.D.F.G.; Marinho, R.D.G.B.; Pereira, D.F.; Yoshioka, E.T.O.; Tavares-Dias, M.; Ozorio, R.O.D.A.; Faria, F.S.E.D.V.D. Hematological and biochemical responses of pirarucu (Arapaima gigas, Arapaimidae) fed with diets containing a glucomannan product derived from yeast and algae. Acta Amaz. 2017, 47, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kiron, V.; Sørensen, M.; Huntley, M.; Vasanth, G.K.; Gong, Y.; Dahle, D.; Palihawadana, A.M. Defatted biomass of the microalga, Desmodesmus sp.; can replace fishmeal in the feeds for Atlantic salmon. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kissinger, K.R.; García-Ortega, A.; Trushenski, J.T. Partial fish meal replacement by soy protein concentrate, squid and algal meals in low fish-oil diets containing Schizochytrium limacinum for longfin yellowtail Seriola rivoliana. Aquaculture 2016, 452, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kousoulaki, K.; Mørkøre, T.; Nengas, I.; Berge, R.K.; Sweetman, J. Microalgae and organic minerals enhance lipid retention efficiency and fillet quality in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 2016, 451, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Maliwat, G.C.F.; Velasquez, S.F.; Buluran, S.M.D.; Tayamen, M.M.; Ragaza, J.A. Growth and immune response of pond-reared giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii post larvae fed diets containing Chlorella vulgaris. Aquacult. Fish. 2021, 6, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Nasir, N.M.; Bakar, N.S.A.; Lananan, F.; Hamid, S.H.A.; Lam, S.S.; Jusoh, A. Treatment of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus wastewater utilizing phytoremediation of microalgae, Chlorella sp. with Aspergillus niger bio-harvesting. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 190, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Pascon, G.; Messina, M.; Petit, L.; Valente, L.M.P.; Oliveira, B.; Przybyla, C.; Tulli, F. Potential application and beneficial effects of a marine microalgal biomass produced in a high-rate algal pond (HRAP) in diets of European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 62185–62199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Fonseca, F.; Fuentes, J.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; Alarcón, F.J.; Mancera, J.M.; Martínez-Rodríguez, G.; Martos-Sitcha, J.A. From invasion to fish fodder: Inclusion of the brown algae Rugulopteryx okamurae in aquafeeds for European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758). Aquaculture 2023, 568, 739318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Patterson, D.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Evaluation of whole and lipid-extracted algae meals in the diets of juvenile red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). Aquaculture 2013, 416, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Sarker, P.K.; Kapuscinski, A.R.; McKuin, B.; Fitzgerald, D.S.; Nash, H.M.; Greenwood, C. Microalgae-blend tilapia feed eliminates fishmeal and fish oil, improves growth, and is cost viable. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Siqwepu, O.; Richoux, N.B.; Vine, N.G. The effect of different dietary microalgae on the fatty acid profile, fecundity and population development of the calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus hessei (Copepoda: Calanoida). Aquaculture 2017, 468, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Southgate, P.C.; Braley, R.D.; Militz, T.A. Ingestion and digestion of micro-algae concentrates by veliger larvae of the giant clam, Tridacna noae. Aquaculture 2017, 473, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Srimongkol, P.; Thongchul, N.; Phunpruch, S.; Karnchanatat, A. The ability of marine Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. VDW to remove ammonium from brackish aquaculture wastewater. Agricult. Water Manag. 2019, 212, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Liu, T.S.; Wu, K.F.; Jiang, H.W.; Chen, K.W.; Nien, T.S.; Bryant, D.A.; Ho, M.Y. Identification of a far-red light-inducible promoter that exhibits light intensity dependency and reversibility in a Cyanobacterium. ACS Synth. Biol. 2023, 12, 1320–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Applications of algae in aquaculture. Algae play diverse and significant roles in aquaculture, contributing to water quality management (nutrient removal, BOD, CO2 sequestration, and bioremediation) and acting as valuable feed supplements (natural nutrition source of omega-3 fatty acids, pigments, and carotenoids) and providing enhanced growth and reproduction, artemia enrichment, biofloc technology, seedling production, and sustainable practices for aquatic animals. The integration of algae in aquaculture demonstrates its versatility in addressing multiple challenges, from water quality management to providing essential nutrition for aquatic animals. Research and ongoing developments continue to explore ways to optimize the use of algae for sustainable and efficient aquaculture production.
Figure 1. Applications of algae in aquaculture. Algae play diverse and significant roles in aquaculture, contributing to water quality management (nutrient removal, BOD, CO2 sequestration, and bioremediation) and acting as valuable feed supplements (natural nutrition source of omega-3 fatty acids, pigments, and carotenoids) and providing enhanced growth and reproduction, artemia enrichment, biofloc technology, seedling production, and sustainable practices for aquatic animals. The integration of algae in aquaculture demonstrates its versatility in addressing multiple challenges, from water quality management to providing essential nutrition for aquatic animals. Research and ongoing developments continue to explore ways to optimize the use of algae for sustainable and efficient aquaculture production.
Fishes 09 00063 g001
Table 1. Biochemical composition and removal nutrient efficiency (%) of algae cultivated in wastewater.
Table 1. Biochemical composition and removal nutrient efficiency (%) of algae cultivated in wastewater.
Biochemical Composition Nutrient Removal Efficiency
AlgaeWastewater SourceProtein
(%)
Lipid
(%)
Carbohydrate
(%)
COD%Nitrate (%)Nitrite (%)Phosphate (%)Ammonia (%)References
Chlorella vulgarisAquaculture
waste water
47.59.119.146–7610010063.1–92.223.4[58]
Chlorella sp.Aquaculture
wase water
55.281024.7746–76628263.1–92.284–96[72]
Chlorella vulgaris and Tetradesmus obliquus Aquaculture wastewater57816.894100--99[62]
Gracilaria
birdiae
Aquaculture
wase water
12.944.8258.1278~100 93.534[73]
Spirulina platensisNile tilapia effluent56132587.297.5959898[63]
Scenedesmus sp.Tilapia19.530.935.158077.773.8~10088.7[59]
Abbreviation: COD—Chemical Oxygen Demand.
Table 2. Algae is used as a dietary feed supplement in aquaculture and its effects on aquatic animals.
Table 2. Algae is used as a dietary feed supplement in aquaculture and its effects on aquatic animals.
AlgaeAlgae (Family)Mode of Algae in Aqua FeedAquatic Organisms (Scientific Name)Aquatic
Organisms
(Common Name)
Dietary Inclusion Level (g/kg or %)Replaced IngredientsBeneficial EffectsReferences
Arthrospira platensisMicrocoleaceaeWholeMacrobrachium
rosenbergii
Giant river prawn50%FMIncreased growth performance and feed conversion efficiency[89]
Arthrospira platensisMicrocoleaceaeWholeOreochromis niloticusNile tilapia10%FMImprove growth rate and digestive enzyme activity[90]
Chlorella
vulgaris
ChlorellaceaeWholeCarassius
auratus
gibelio
Carp0.4–2.0%FMEnhanced
immunoglobulin (Ig) M
and D, interleukin-22
(IL)-22, and chemokine
(C-C motif) ligand 5
(CCL-5)
[91]
Chlorella vulgarisChlorellaceaeWholeM. rosenbergiiGiant river prawn4–8%FMEnhanced growth rate, immune system, and disease resistance against
pathogens
[92]
Dunaliella salinaDunaliellaceaeWholePenaeus monodonBlack tiger shrimp10%_Improved growth rate[93]
Gracilaria fisheriGracilariaceae P. monodonGiant tiger prawn100–200 μg/mlFM
-
Enhanced immune system and increased resistance against white spot syndrome virus[94]
Gracilaria arcuataGracilariaceae O. niloticusNile tilapia20%FMEnhanced growth performance[95]
Nannochloropsis
oculata
Monodopsidaceae and
Thraustochytriaceae
LEAO. niloticusNile tilapia33–100%PREnhanced growth rate and nutritional quality of farmed fish[96]
Pyropia
spheroplasts
BangiaceaeWholeApostichopus
japonicus
Japanese sea cucumber50 g/kg-Improved growth rate and feed conversion efficiency[97]
Sargassum wightiiSargassaceae Penaeus
monodon
Giant tiger prawn400 mg/L-Better growth rate and increased disease resistance[98,99]
Spirulina sp.SpirulinaceaeWholeCyprinus carpioCommon carp5 g/kg-Higher growth rate and feed conversion ratio[100]
Scenedesmus obliquusScenedesmaceaeWhole and LEAAnarhichas
minor
Spotted wolffish4%PRIncreased growth performance and skin color[101]
Schizochytrium sp.ThraustochytriaceaeWholeSalmo salarAtlantic salmon100–150 g/kgFOEnhanced growth performance, fillet quality, nutrient retention efficiency, and blood chemistry[102]
Schizochytrium sp.ThraustochytriaceaeWholeOncorhynchus mykissRainbow troutNM-Better replacement of FM and FO [103]
S. platensisMicrocoleaceaeWholePterophyllum scalareAngel fish5 g/kgFMBetter nutrient additives for fish growth[104]
S. platensisMicrocoleaceaeWhole and LEAO. niloticusNile Tilapia5–10 g/kgPRBetter growth and immunity promoter[105]
S. platensisMicrocoleaceaeWholeTrachinotus ovatusSilver fish5%FMImproved growth, body composition and feed utilization[106]
S. platensisMicrocoleaceaeWholeC. carpioKoi carp5%FMStimulation of the immune system[100]
Tisochrysis luteaIsochrysidaceae-Sparus aurataGilthead seabream5%-Higher growth rate, nutrient utilization, and survival rate[107]
Ulva rigidaUlvaceae-Mugil cephalusCommon grey mullet10 mg/kg- Enhanced growth response, and antioxidant and immune stimulation[108]
Abbreviation: Penaeus monodon—P. monodon, Cyprinus carpio—C. carpio, Oreochromis niloticus—O. niloticus, Salmo salar—S. salar, Pseudodiaptomus hessei—P. hessei, gram—g, microgram—μg, milligram—mg, kilogram—kg, milliliter—ml, Immunoglobulin—Ig, interleukin—IL, fishmeal—FM, fish oil—FO, lipid-extracted microalgae—LEA, not mention—NM, larval food—LF, protein—PR, digestible protein—DP, apparent digestibility coefficients—ADC.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vijayaram, S.; Ringø, E.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Ahani, S.; Chou, C.-C. Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A Review. Fishes 2024, 9, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020063

AMA Style

Vijayaram S, Ringø E, Ghafarifarsani H, Hoseinifar SH, Ahani S, Chou C-C. Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A Review. Fishes. 2024; 9(2):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vijayaram, Srirengaraj, Einar Ringø, Hamed Ghafarifarsani, Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar, Saman Ahani, and Chi-Chung Chou. 2024. "Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A Review" Fishes 9, no. 2: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020063

APA Style

Vijayaram, S., Ringø, E., Ghafarifarsani, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ahani, S., & Chou, C. -C. (2024). Use of Algae in Aquaculture: A Review. Fishes, 9(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9020063

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop