Next Article in Journal
A Study on the Impact of Environmental Factors on Chub Mackerel Scomber japonicus Fishing Grounds Based on a Linear Mixed Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Temperature and Salinity on the Growth, Reproduction, and Carotenoid Accumulation in Artemia sinica and Transcriptome Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
First Insights into the Migration Route and Spatial Distribution of the Endangered Chinese Sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) in the Yangtze River Estuary
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) Juice Byproduct Administered Using Different Feeding Methods on the Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activity, Antioxidant Status, and Disease Resistance against Streptococcus iniae of Juvenile Black Rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed: Benefits and Challenges

Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa
Fishes 2024, 9(8), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9080322
Submission received: 21 June 2024 / Revised: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 12 August 2024 / Published: 13 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feed Additives in Aquaculture)

Abstract

:
Aquaculture production is continuously increasing, consequently increasing the demand for feed. Unfortunately, the reliance on fish meal and fish oil also raises sustainability issues due to overfishing and resource depletion. Nanoparticle-enhanced feed presents a promising solution to these challenges. Nanoparticles, with their large surface area-to-volume ratio and encapsulation capabilities, significantly improve nutrient delivery, absorption, and utilization, enhancing growth and health. Their immune-modulatory and antimicrobial properties reduce antibiotic use and support sustainability. This review explores different nanoparticles in fish feed, including metal-based, non-metal-based, and composite types, each offering benefits for fish growth and health. It highlights the advantages of nanoparticle-enhanced feed, such as improved nutrient delivery, immune enhancement, antimicrobial action, stress reduction, and environmental sustainability. Concerns like potential toxicity, safety, bioaccumulation, and environmental impacts of nanoparticles, together with measures of addressing these concerns, are also highlighted. The review concludes with insights into future research directions.
Key Contribution: Incorporating nanoparticles in fish feed offers numerous benefits, including improved nutrient absorption; enhanced growth rates; better feed conversion ratios; and overall health improvements in fish. Various types of nanoparticles, such as metal-based; non-metal-based; and composite nanoparticles; can boost fish immune systems; reducing the need for antibiotics and lowering the risk of disease outbreaks. Additionally, nanoparticle-enhanced feeds provide environmental advantages, such as reduced waste and eutrophication, thereby supporting the sustainability of aquaculture practices.

1. Introduction

Global aquaculture production has steadily increased, reaching 223.2 million tonnes in 2022, with 185.4 million tonnes from aquatic animals and 37.8 million tonnes from algae [1]. The rise in fish production increases the demand for fish feed, which is crucial for providing essential nutrients necessary for the growth, health, and productivity of farmed fish [2]. Traditional fish feeds are formulated with macronutrients (proteins, lipids, carbohydrates), micronutrients (vitamins, minerals), and other essential ingredients primarily sourced from marine products such as fish meal and fish oil [3]. These feeds aim to enhance nutritional quality, improve feed conversion ratios, and promote growth [4,5,6]. However, the reliance on fish meal and fish oil drives up costs and raises sustainability concerns due to overfishing and resource depletion [7,8]. To address these issues and improve sustainability, there has been a shift towards partially replacing marine ingredients with vegetable-based alternatives. However, this shift introduces challenges such as reduced feed utilization due to non-starch polysaccharides, lower phosphorus content affecting fish health, indigestible fibers impairing digestion, a lack of essential amino acids like methionine, and decreased palatability [3]. Additionally, these feed types, whether prepared as bulk or premixed formulations, face issues such as nutrient degradation during storage and processing, and inadequate control over nutrient release kinetics. These problems can lead to nutrient wastage, inconsistent absorption, and reduced effectiveness [9,10,11].
Nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed presents a promising alternative strategy towards promoting sustainable aquaculture [12]. Nanoparticles (NPs), ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers in size, possess unique physical and chemical properties that can be utilized to overcome some limitations found in both marine-derived and plant-based feeds. Additionally, the tunable structural features and characteristics of NPs enable researchers to customize them for diverse aquaculture feeds, leading to significant improvements in feed efficiency, fish growth, and overall health and disease resistance [13,14,15,16]. Size and shape can be precisely controlled using various synthesis methods, including chemical (sol–gel, chemical vapor deposition), template-assisted, electrochemical techniques, and seed-mediated growth, among others [17,18,19]. Smaller nanoparticles, due to their high surface area-to-volume ratio allow for molecular-level interactions with biological systems, enabling precise targeting and nutrient uptake. This enhances nutrient absorption and bioavailability, resulting in improved feed performance and reduced waste [20,21]. For example, due to their high surface area-to-volume ratio, NPs can be more easily broken down and absorbed in the fish’s digestive system. This increased surface area enhances interactions with digestive enzymes, leading to improved nutrient digestibility and overall feed utilization [22,23].
NPs can be engineered into various shapes such as spheres, rods, or disks [24,25]. The shape of NPs influences their behavior in living organisms, impacting how they circulate, accumulate, penetrate tissues, and are taken up by cells [26,27]. Nonspherical NPs, such as those with rod-shaped or disk-shaped designs, often exhibit longer circulation times and enhanced delivery efficacy compared to spherical NPs. Their unique shapes can improve stability, reduce clearance by the immune system, and facilitate better targeting and uptake by specific cells or tissues [28]. This results in the more effective delivery of nutrients or therapeutic agents.
Adjusting NP composition through doping and hybrid formation allows for the fine-tuning of properties to maximize effectiveness in fish feed [29]. Additionally, surface modification through functionalization, the use of stabilizers, or the use of coatings enhances reactivity, stability, and compatibility, reduces aggregation, and improves interactions with feed ingredients and biological systems [30,31]. Guo et al. demonstrated that NPs with small sizes, low negative charges, and moderate hydrophilicity can readily penetrate the small intestinal mucus layer. Once through the mucus, their effectiveness in traversing intestinal epithelial cells depends on factors like the appropriate size, positive charge, and hydrophobic properties [32]. This suggests that incorporating functional groups, stabilizers, or coatings with amphiphilic properties could enhance NP transport by balancing interactions with both the mucus layer and epithelial cells, optimizing their delivery and effectiveness in the gastrointestinal tract.
The large surface area-to-volume ratio of these NPs also enables the efficient loading and encapsulation of essential nutrients and therapeutic agents. This capability helps protect these components from degradation and ensures their controlled release. Encapsulation not only enhances the stability of nutrients and therapeutic agents but also enhances their absorption by fish. As a result, this leads to improved feed conversion ratios, better growth performance, and overall enhanced health outcomes in aquaculture. Additionally, the targeted delivery of these nutrients can help in minimizing waste [13,14,33].
Furthermore, nanoparticles with immune-modulatory and antimicrobial properties can enhance fish immunity, reduce antibiotic use, and control pathogenic bacteria, promoting better health and reducing disease outbreaks [14,16,33,34,35]. Figure 1 summarizes the different characteristics of nanoparticles and their potential benefits in nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed.
As the aquaculture sector evolves, understanding nanotechnology’s role in fish nutrition is increasingly important. This review explores recent studies on nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed, highlighting its potential benefits and possible challenges. It focuses on how various NPs can improve growth, health, and environmental sustainability in aquaculture, demonstrating the potential of this technology to enhance production efficiency, sustainability, and fish health. It covers a range of nanoparticle types, including metal-based, non-metal-based, and composite or hybrid nanoparticles, each offering unique benefits for fish nutrition.

2. Nanoparticles Used in Fish Feed

Various nanoparticles, including metal-based, non-metal-based, and composite or hybrid nanoparticles, are being explored for their potential to improve fish growth, health, and overall productivity [36]. Most of these NPs are synthesized using fish macronutrients and micronutrients [37,38].

2.1. Metal-Based Nanoparticles

Metal-based nanoparticles consist primarily of metals like zinc, copper, magnesium, manganese, and iron, each providing distinct advantages when used in fish feed [39]. Table 1 summarizes various studies on the effects of different nanoparticle dosages on various fish species, showing the species, administered dosage, exposure duration, and observed effects.

2.1.1. Zinc-Based Nanoparticles

Zinc is an essential micronutrient for fish, critical for normal growth, metabolic regulation, immune response, gene expression, and reproductive health [66]. Zinc supplements often fall short in ensuring optimal zinc uptake, whereas zinc nanoparticles have shown superior efficacy. Due to their small size, these nanoparticles facilitate efficient zinc absorption, significantly enhancing bioavailability and utilization [13,14,15,16]. High nutrient bioavailability is critical in fish nutrition for maximizing nutrient utilization, leading to improved growth, health, and overall performance. NPs enhance this process by increasing the surface area available for interaction with the digestive system and targeting specific sites within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby improving the delivery and uptake of micronutrients [67]. A study on O. niloticus (Nile tilapia) fingerlings compared the effects of bulk ZnO and ZnONPs at a dosage of 60 mg/kg over 84 days. Results indicated that fish fed with ZnONPs exhibited superior growth, enhanced digestive enzyme activity, improved intestinal health, and the highest oxidative enzyme activity coupled with the lowest oxidative stress levels. These findings highlight the potential of NPs in promoting robust health and growth in aquaculture species [43].
NPs can also enhance fish health and disease resistance by stimulating the immune system. They act as immune triggers, boosting antibody and cytokine production, enhancing immune cell function, and delivering immune agents directly to cells, thus improving treatment efficacy [41,45,68,69]. This leads to reduced disease rates, lower antibiotic use, and better growth and feed efficiency. For instance, the inclusion of ZnONPs in O. niloticus feed was shown to enhance immune responses and disease resistance against A. hydrophila [41].
In addition, nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed offers significant antimicrobial benefits. NPs can disrupt microbial cell membranes and interfere with essential cellular processes, leading to microbial cell death [70]. For example, Metryka et al. examined the effects of ZnONPs and other metal NPs (AgNPs, CuNPs, and TiO2 NPs) on Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The study found that various types and concentrations of NPs uniquely affected bacterial membrane permeability, cytoplasmic leakage, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels, ATPase activity, and fatty acid profiles. E. coli was the most sensitive to these nanoparticles, with ZnONPs and CuNPs having particularly significant impacts [71]. This research highlights the complex interactions between metallic NPs and bacterial cells resulting in antimicrobial activities. NPs can also disrupt bacterial biofilms, increasing pathogens’ vulnerability to treatments [72]. The surfaces of NPs can be modified with antimicrobial coatings to target specific pathogens. They can also be engineered to load and release antimicrobial agents directly at infection sites [73]. For instance, ZnONPs functionalized with glutamic acid and conjugated with thiosemicarbazone, combined with thymol, demonstrated enhanced antibacterial activity with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 3.12–25.5 µg/mL and a 95% biofilm inhibition, suggesting a promising approach for P. aeruginosa infections [74].
Table 1 provides an overview of the effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) on different fish species at various dosages and exposure durations. The application of ZnONPs in fish feed demonstrates a range of benefits across different fish species, including enhanced growth, improved immune responses, better oxidative stress management, and increased disease resistance. The dosage and duration of ZnONP administration are critical factors that influence the extent of these benefits. Proper dosage ensures that fish receive the optimal amount of nutrients for maximum growth while minimizing excess feed and waste, thereby reducing the environmental impact [12,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,75]. ZnONPs emerge as a promising additive in aquaculture, enhancing fish health and performance, and fostering sustainable aquaculture practices.

2.1.2. Iron Nanoparticles

In aquatic animals, iron is crucial for numerous physiological processes, including redox reactions and electron transport involved in cellular respiration, growth rate, and fatty acid metabolism [14,39]. It plays crucial roles in fish biology, such as heme synthesis, iron storage in ferritin, and the formation of Fe-S clusters. Furthermore, iron is present in enzymes like catalase and lipoxygenases [76,77].
Iron nanoparticles (FeNPs) have emerged as a promising addition to fish feed due to their unique properties and potential benefits for aquaculture [75]. Their small size and large surface area-to-volume ratio enhance nutrient absorption in the digestive tract, ensuring fish receive sufficient iron for crucial physiological functions [14]. This increased bioavailability supports cellular respiration, growth rate regulation, and fatty acid metabolism, leading to improved growth rates and overall health.
Table 1 shows the effects of Fe2O3NPs on various fish species, demonstrating significant improvements in growth, health, and overall performance across different dosages and exposure durations. It highlights the benefits of Fe2O3NPs in fish feed, including elevated growth rates, improved nutrient absorption and utilization, and enhanced biochemical and hematological parameters. Additionally, Fe2O3NPs contribute to better immune responses and the overall health and survival rates of fish [48,49,50,51,52,53,76,78]. For instance, Fe3O4NPs at a dose of 1.2 mg/L have been reported to have a therapeutic effect in C. gariepinus against Aeromonas sobria [79]. These positive outcomes across different species and conditions accentuate the potential of Fe2O3NPs as a valuable additive in aquaculture, promoting the superior health and performance of cultured fish. Incorporating these NPs into fish diets could lead to more sustainable and efficient aquaculture practices.

2.1.3. Magnesium Nanoparticles

Magnesium nanoparticles, due to their small size and large surface area-to-volume ratio, are more easily absorbed in the digestive tract of fish compared to conventional magnesium supplements [39]. This improved bioavailability ensures that fish receive sufficient magnesium, which is crucial for various physiological processes, including protein synthesis, enzyme activation, energy production, and the development and maintenance of healthy bones and muscles [80]. By providing a more bioavailable form of magnesium, Mg-based NPs can enhance these metabolic processes, leading to improved growth rates and better overall health in fish [81,82,83].
The application of magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgONPs) in fish feed has shown promising results across various fish species, as detailed in Table 1. The benefits include improved growth, enhanced health status, and increased disease resistance [54,55,56]. These advantages highlight the potential of MgONPs as a valuable feed additive in aquaculture, promoting enhanced fish health and performance, and fostering sustainable aquaculture practices.

2.1.4. Manganese Nanoparticles

Manganese is a vital trace mineral for fish, essential for enzyme function, metabolism, bone development, reproductive health, immune function, and growth. It aids in protecting cells from oxidative damage, synthesizing critical molecules, forming bones and cartilage, supporting reproductive hormone synthesis, enhancing immune response, and influencing nervous system development [67,84]. Optimal manganese levels in fish feed are crucial for health and productivity.
Table 1 summarizes the effects of manganese dioxide nanoparticles (MnO2NPs) on various fish species, indicating notable improvements in growth, feed utilization, hematological traits, and stress response across different dosages and exposure durations. For instance, in P. fulvidraco (yellow catfish), a dosage of 13.6 mg/kg over 8 weeks led to better growth performance and feed utilization [57], highlighting the efficiency of MnO2NPs in nutrient uptake. Cyprinus carpio (common carp) exhibited enhanced growth and improved hematological traits when administered 6 mg/100 g for 21 days [58], showcasing the dual benefits for physical development and blood health. In P. hypophthalmus (pangasius catfish), a dosage of 3 mg/kg for 105 days helped control gene regulation under multiple stress conditions [61], pointing to MnO2NPs’ role in genetic adaptation and resilience.
These positive outcomes suggest that MnO2NPs can be a valuable additive in aquaculture, promoting better health and performance in fish under different environmental conditions. However, the specific effects vary depending on the species, dosage, and duration, indicating the importance of tailored application strategies for optimal results. This emphasizes the need for species-specific research and careful dosage management to maximize the benefits of NPs in aquaculture.

2.1.5. Copper Nanoparticles

Copper is a vital trace element for all living organisms, including fish, playing a crucial role as a component of enzymes necessary for various life processes. It acts as a cofactor for specific proteins and enzymes, facilitating metabolic processes such as antioxidant reactions by scavenging free radicals. Copper is also essential for electron transport, and the formation of hemoglobin and collagen [85,86,87]. A study by Kumar et al. found that copper-supplemented diets at 8 mg/kg effectively reduced stress from arsenic, low pH, and high temperatures in P. hypophthalmus. These diets downregulated oxidative stress genes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase) and stress proteins (heat shock protein, inducible nitric oxide synthase, metallothionine, caspase 3a, and cytochrome P450). They also improved immunity-related genes (tumor necrosis factor alpha, immunoglobulins, and toll-like receptors) and attributes (albumin, globulin, total protein, blood glucose, nitroblue tetrazolium, myeloperoxidase). Additionally, the diet increased neurotransmitter enzyme and vitamin C levels, reduced DNA damage, and enhanced growth indices. Copper diets also decreased arsenic bioaccumulation, improved immunity, and increased survival rates after A. hydrophila infection, suggesting their effectiveness in helping fish cope with environmental stressors, enhancing health, and boosting survival rates [87].
Fish typically obtain copper from water and their diet, but the copper in water is often insufficient. Therefore, supplementing copper in fish feed is necessary to achieve optimal health levels [88]. Copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) are known for their superior bioavailability compared to inorganic copper forms, as their small size facilitates easier absorption through endocytosis and cell bypass mechanisms. This enhances their biological effects and availability [89]. For instance, Afshari et al. showed that nanoparticulate Cu improved the growth and immune responses of snow trout more effectively than bulk copper [90]. The high bioavailability of CuNPs can reduce the need for additional copper supplements and decrease copper waste excretion, benefiting fish health by reducing water pollution.
Table 1 indicates that both CuNPs and CuONPs significantly enhance fish health and performance. CuNPs are shown to improve growth, immune function, and antioxidative capacities across various fish species [62,63,64], while CuONPs are particularly effective in boosting growth in Koi carp [65]. These nanoparticles show great promise as fish feed additives, enhancing growth rates, immune responses, and oxidative stress management. The benefits vary with dosage and species, highlighting the need for customized application strategies in aquaculture.

2.2. Non-Metal-Based Nanoparticles

Non-metal-based nanoparticles are increasingly being explored as additives in fish feed due to their potential benefits for fish health and growth [91,92]. Table 2 provides a summary of studies examining the impact of different nanoparticle dosages on various fish species. It details the species, dosage levels, exposure durations, and observed effects.

2.2.1. Selenium Nanoparticles

Selenium (Se) is a vital micronutrient in aquafeeds, essential for promoting growth, welfare, and overall health in various fish species. Providing selenium in precise amounts can enhance growth performance, physiological health, and disease resistance in aquaculture [108]. Using selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) significantly boosts its bioavailability and effectiveness [109].
Nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed plays a crucial role in mitigating stress and enhancing fish health. Incorporating NPs such as Se with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties into fish diets helps stabilize the fish’s physiological responses to environmental stressors such as fluctuations in water quality, overcrowding, or handling. This stabilization reduces stress hormone production and minimizes stress-related health issues, including suppressed immune function and increased susceptibility to diseases [31,61,96,106]. For example, sobaity seabream fed diets with 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg of SeNPs for 60 days showed increased catalase activity, with the 2 mg/kg group exhibiting the lowest malondialdehyde levels. SeNPs boosted lysozyme and complement activity, particularly at 0.5 mg/kg, and elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor I and immune genes were observed. The SeNPs diet also helped stressed fish recover by reducing plasma glucose concentration. These findings indicate that SeNPs significantly enhance the health and immune function of sobaity seabream, with 2 mg/kg of SeNPs being optimal for boosting immune function and reducing oxidative stress, while 0.5 mg/kg also provides notable immune benefits and supports stress recovery [97].
Research by Eissa et al. on Oreochromis niloticus exposed to Aspergillus flavus infection showed that SeNPs up to 1 mg/kg significantly improved growth, feed efficiency, and survival rates. Additionally, SeNPs enhanced haemato-biochemical parameters, digestive enzyme activity, and antioxidant capacity, supporting overall physiological health and metabolic efficiency. Fish exposed to A. flavus had reduced mortality, indicating a stronger immune response, and significant improvements in intestinal morphology and histopathological scores for key tissues were observed [91]. These examples highlight the potential of SeNP-enhanced feed in improving fish health, stress resilience, and overall performance in aquaculture.
Table 2 highlights the positive impact of SeNPs on various fish species, showing their potential as valuable aquafeed additives. SeNPs enhance growth, feed efficiency, survival, immune response, antioxidant capacity, and stress resistance, with benefits varying by dosage and duration, highlighting the need for tailored application strategies [31,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. Incorporating SeNPs into fish diets can lead to healthier, more robust fish, improving aquaculture productivity and sustainability.

2.2.2. Protein-Based Nanoparticles

Protein-based nanoparticles (PNPs) are emerging as a promising constituent in fish feed due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and ability to improve nutrient delivery. Engineered from various proteins like albumin, casein, and soy protein, PNPs offer a versatile platform for enhancing the nutritional and health benefits of aquafeeds [110,111].
The large surface area-to-volume ratio of these NPs allows for the effective loading, encapsulation, and stabilization of essential nutrients and therapeutic agents, protecting them until they reach their target site. This is crucial for maintaining the stability and bioavailability of sensitive nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, and essential fatty acids that may degrade during feed processing and storage. Encapsulation also shields these nutrients from environmental factors like light, heat, and oxygen, as well as from harsh conditions in the fish’s gastrointestinal tract, including acidic pH and digestive enzymes. This protection enhances nutrient absorption and overall feed effectiveness [112,113,114]. Additionally, these NPs can be engineered for the controlled or sustained release of encapsulated nutrients and therapeutic agents. For example, Tian et al. encapsulated soy isoflavones (SIF) using polymerized goat milk whey protein (PGWP), forming PGWP-SIF nanoparticles with an 89% encapsulation efficiency. These NPs maintained SIF stability under varying pH, salt concentrations, and temperature changes, with only 5.93% of SIF released during gastric digestion and 56.61% released in the intestinal phase. This demonstrated efficient delivery to the small intestine and increased bioavailability [115]. NPs also enhance nutrient solubility due to their large surface area-to-volume ratio, which facilitates the dissolution of water-insoluble nutrients and their distribution in water and the fish’s digestive system. For instance, curcumin, known for its potent antioxidant properties, typically has low aqueous solubility and poor systemic bioavailability. Encapsulation within NPs improves curcumin’s bioavailability by enabling controlled release from the nanoparticle core, thereby enhancing its antioxidant effects. Additionally, the small size of NPs allows for better dispersion in digestive fluids, improving nutrient absorption by the intestinal mucosa [99,116]. For example, Yuan et al. developed soy protein nanoparticles (SPNPs) by self-assembling amphiphilic hydrolysates from partially hydrolyzed soy protein isolate and incorporated curcumin into their hydrophobic core. This method significantly enhanced curcumin’s solubility and stability, improving its gastrointestinal bioaccessibility and demonstrating synergistic antioxidant activity that reduced oxidative damage in hepatoblastoma (HepG2) cells [99].
SPNPs have also been reported to deliver immunostimulants to boost fish immune responses [113]. These examples illustrate how NPs can enhance nutrient delivery, promote better growth rates and feed conversion ratios, and even reduce disease outbreaks, thereby improving overall farm productivity [113,117].
Table 2 summarizes the benefits of SPNP-enhanced fish feed across different fish species, showcasing its potential as an alternative to traditional fish feed. It highlights how this approach improves nutrient bioavailability and enhances immune responses, leading to better fish health and increased aquaculture productivity.

2.2.3. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles

Lipid-based nanoparticles (LNPs) significantly enhance the nutritional value and health benefits of fish feeds. These nanoparticles encapsulate and protect sensitive nutrients like vitamins, minerals, and fatty acids from degradation, ensuring their stability and bioavailability for better nutrient utilization and overall fish health [118]. Yostawonkul et al. conducted a study aimed at producing all-male red tilapia. They achieved this by giving them 60 ppm of the androgen hormone 17 alpha-methyltestosterone (MT) with MT-loaded alkyl polyglucoside nanostructured lipid carriers (APG-NLC) orally for 21 days. Their research found that MT released from MT-APG-NLC was much higher than free MT. Consequently, there were significantly more male fish at the end of the 21-day period compared to the control group. Additionally, APG-NLC showed impressive qualities like a high encapsulation efficiency, thermal stability, and cost-effectiveness when used to masculinize tilapia with MT [100]. These findings highlight the effectiveness of encapsulation technology in enhancing the delivery and efficacy of nutrients, drugs, and sensitive compounds, suggesting a promising avenue for reducing their dosage requirements in aquaculture practices.
LNPs also promote improved growth rates and feed efficiency by gradually releasing encapsulated nutrients at required doses [119], supporting continuous development. They also boost immune response by delivering immunostimulants or vaccines directly to fish, enhancing disease resistance and reducing mortality [120]. Additionally, LNPs deliver antioxidants to fish tissues, reducing oxidative stress, and improving health. For example, Trapani et al. developed a new solid lipid nanoparticle (SLNP) formulation using Gelucire® 50/13 and Precirol® ATO5 to deliver grape seed extract (GSE) with antioxidant compounds to fish cells. When cell lines from gilthead seabream and European sea bass were treated with GSE-SLNPs for 24 h, their viability increased. Gene expression analysis showed that antioxidant genes were upregulated, while hsp70 and cytoskeleton-related genes were downregulated [101]. This suggests that GSE-SLNPs could effectively enhance the viability and antioxidant properties of fish.
As shown in Table 2, LNPs can significantly enhance growth, immunity, and disease resistance in various fish species, making them valuable for improving aquaculture productivity and sustainability [100,101,102].

2.2.4. Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles

Incorporating chitosan-based nanoparticles (CTNPs) into fish feed offers numerous benefits. These NPs act as carriers for essential nutrients like vitamins, minerals, and proteins, effectively delivering these vital components to fish and thereby enhancing the overall nutritional value of the feed [21,121,122]. For instance, L-methionine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (M-CTNPs) demonstrated controlled release in vitro, effectively meeting the dietary methionine requirements of L. rohita fingerlings in a 60-day feeding trial. This supplementation resulted in significantly higher growth rates, improved protein efficiency, and enhanced sero-immunological test scores, including increased levels of serum total protein, serum globulin, the serum albumin ratio, phagocytic respiratory burst/nitroblue tetrazolium reduction, and lysozyme activity. The observed growth enhancement was further supported by elevated levels of liver transaminases and dehydrogenases [103], indicating improved metabolic activity. Similarly, Araujo et al. highlighted the effective controlled release of selenium from Se-loaded chitosan nanoparticles in the diet of O. niloticus. This approach significantly enhanced growth performance, feed efficiency, and antioxidant activity while reducing oxidative stress [121].
Furthermore, O. niloticus fed diets containing 1.0 g/kg of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (NAG)-loaded CTNPs exhibited significant improvements in growth and immune parameters. These fish showed enhanced specific growth rate, weight gain, survival rate, respiratory burst, and lysozyme activities. Additionally, both biologically active CTNPs and NAG-loaded CTNPs demonstrated potent antimicrobial effects against Streptococcus agalactiae, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The findings suggest that the dietary supplement containing NAG-loaded CTNPs significantly enhances the immune-modulatory properties, growth performance, and disease resistance of O. niloticus (Nile tilapia) [69]. Furthermore, antimicrobial properties help prevent the proliferation of harmful bacteria and pathogens within the fish, reducing the risk of infections and promoting better health [123].
CTNPs can also stimulate the fish’s immune system, enhancing their resilience against diseases and stressors, leading to improved survival rates and performance in aquaculture operations [124]. For instance, administering dietary CTNPs to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) induced varied expression patterns of all targeted inflammatory mediator genes. During enteric redmouth infection, this treatment resulted in mild signs of discomfort and reduced fish morbidity. Increased molecular expressions, mild pathological lesions, and a relatively unaffected splenic reticulin framework were observed, indicating that the therapeutic administration of CTNPs in O. mykiss enhances their resistance and inflammatory responses to infections [107]. These findings suggest that CTNPs have promising biotherapeutic properties, significantly enhancing fish resistance to infections and improving overall fish health and survival rates in aquaculture.
As shown in Table 2, CTNPs significantly enhance various aspects of fish health and performance. CTNPs effectively improve growth rates, protein efficiency, immune response, and disease resistance across different fish species. The addition of specific compounds like methionine, NAG, thymol, and vitamin C with CTNPs further amplifies these benefits, contributing to better feed utilization, oxidative stress management, and overall fish health [69,103,104,105,106,107]. Thus, CTNPs present a promising strategy for enhancing aquaculture productivity and sustainability.

2.3. Composite and Hybrid Nanoparticles

Composite and hybrid nanoparticles, which combine different materials or components, offer enhanced properties and functionalities in fish nutrition [29,42,125,126,127,128]. Table 3 provides a summary of studies examining the impact of different composite or hybrid nanoparticle dosages on various fish species. It details the species, dosage levels, exposure durations, and observed effects.
Like other nanoparticles, they act as carriers for essential nutrients and compounds, ensuring their stability and bioavailability. Additionally, these nanoparticles provide a gradual release of nutrients, maintaining a sustained supply for fish over time [15,29,128,129]. For example, ZnONPs, SeNPs, and Se-ZnONPs were loaded on graphene oxide nanosheets (GO) to form hybrid nanocomposites: GO@Se, GO@ZnO, and GO@Se-ZnO. These nanocomposites significantly enhanced antioxidant activity and physiological functions in O. niloticus, making them valuable for aquatic feed. The inclusion of ZnONPs (GO@ZnO and GO@Se-ZnO) in these nanocomposites improved gastrointestinal passage and absorption, leading to more efficient protein synthesis and increased fish weight. Histomorphological examinations revealed severe degeneration in intestinal villi due to Streptococcus iniae infection in O. niloticus, but notable improvements were observed when feed containing GO@Se-ZnO was used. This included increased villi length and branching, boosted immune cell presence, enhanced disease resistance, and weight gain [29]. These results support using nanocomposites in aquaculture nutrition systems, highlighting their potential to improve fish health and growth.
A synbiotic formula was also created by combining pomegranate peel extract, serving as a prebiotic source, with a mixture of probiotic species. This resulted in a product with effective antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Encapsulated in alginate-CaCl2 nanocapsules, this alginate nanoencapsulated synbiotic composite exhibited superior physicochemical, biological, and industrial properties compared to its non-encapsulated form [129]. Composite and hybrid nanoparticles can incorporate bioactive compounds with antimicrobial or immunomodulatory properties, enhancing fish health and disease resistance. For instance, O. niloticus fed with Chlorella vulgaris extract coated with magnetic FeONPs exhibited improved immune barrier and antioxidant functions in their skin and gills, leading to better survival rates following infections by Ichthyophthirius multifiliis and A. hydrophila [15].
The recurrent contamination of feed materials with mycotoxigenic fungi poses a risk to both farmed animals and humans [130]. To address this, selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) were synthesized using Cystoseira myrica algal extract (CE) and conjugated with chitosan nanoparticles (CTNPs), creating a potential antifungal nanocomposite for controlling Aspergillus flavus isolates in fish feed. This nanocomposite significantly reduced A. flavus count and growth after 7 days of storage. The innovatively constructed CTNPs/CE/SeNPs nanocomposite was shown to be an effective, biosafe, and natural fungicidal agent for protecting fish feed from mycotoxigenic fungi [128].
Table 2, shows that composite and hybrid nanoparticles, including Se/ZnONPs, ZnNPs/probiotics, graphene oxide composites, and blends like nano-curcumin/chitosan, significantly enhance various aspects of fish health and performance. These nanoparticles improve growth, digestion, immune status, antioxidant capacity, and disease resistance. Their synergistic effects and enhanced bioactivities suggest their potential as effective additives in aquaculture feeds, promoting better growth rates, health, and disease resistance while possibly reducing the need for medications and supplements [29,42,125,126,127,128]. This makes them valuable for advancing aquaculture productivity and sustainability.
It should be noted, however, that the feed processing methods used for incorporating NPs can impact their stability, dispersion, and overall effectiveness. Factors such as heat treatments, exposure to moisture, and chemical interactions can alter NP properties. Thus, the selection of an appropriate feed processing technique and optimizing processing conditions is essential to fully harness the benefits of nanoparticles in fish feed [131,132]. When effectively optimized, nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed has the potential to be a profitable investment. Although initial production costs for NPs may be high, the long-term benefits, including improved feed efficiency, better fish health leading to reduced veterinary expenses, and increased fish productivity, can make the investment worthwhile.

2.4. Toxicity, Safety, and Environmental Impact of Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed

While nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed offers numerous benefits and promising advancements in aquaculture, it is crucial to carefully evaluate its toxicity, safety, and the environmental impact of NPs.

2.4.1. Toxicity and Safety Issues

Nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed offers significant benefits but raises health concerns that need careful consideration. Studies show that NPs can impact fish health, potentially causing oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered behavior [133]. Although many NPs in fish feed are derived from essential nutrients and micronutrients derived from safe ingredients, the NP toxicity is influenced by factors such as particle size, shape, and exposure duration [134]. Due to their small size and high surface area-to-volume ratio, NPs can interact uniquely with biological systems [135], which may contribute to their distinct toxicity profile. For example, ZnONPs can cause oxidative stress and inflammation [136,137,138] more readily than bulk zinc-based feed additives. Similarly, SeNPs, although nutritionally superior to their bulk counterparts [139], can have adverse effects at non-optimal doses, including decreased sperm quality, increased oxidative stress, DNA damage in sperm, and disrupted testis development [140]. These potential risks underscore the need for the careful evaluation and management of NP use in fish feed to ensure both efficacy and safety.
The long-term effects of NP accumulation in fish tissues remain unclear, highlighting the need for thorough toxicological research even for NPs derived from safe ingredients. Additionally, the release of NPs into aquatic environments through excretion or feed waste could impact non-target organisms and disrupt ecological balance, affecting water quality and biodiversity [141].
Human health risks are also a concern, as residual NPs in fish may pose risks to consumers, necessitating rigorous safety testing. Variability in NP properties, such as size and surface charge, complicates safety predictions and requires careful consideration in regulatory frameworks [133,142].
On the positive side, the precise engineering of NPs for controlled nutrient and drug delivery can enhance bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This targeted approach allows for lower dosages, reducing overall exposure and toxicity. Controlled release directs NPs to specific sites, minimizing unintended contact with sensitive tissues and preventing long-term toxic effects [143,144,145,146]. Overall, this method improves therapeutic benefits while managing toxicity effectively.

2.4.2. Bioaccumulation and Environmental Impact

The possible bioaccumulation and environmental impact of nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed raises significant concerns that necessitate detailed study for sustainable aquaculture. NPs can accumulate in fish tissues, potentially causing oxidative stress, inflammation, and other health issues that may affect growth and reproduction. For instance, ZnONPs may accumulate in fish tissues, posing long-term toxicity risks [147,148], unlike other bulky additives. These NPs can also be transferred through the food chain, posing risks to higher trophic levels, including humans [149].
When released into the environment through feed waste or excretion, NPs can affect non-target organisms and disrupt ecosystems. Their behavior in water is influenced by factors such as chemistry, temperature, and organic matter, which affect their toxicity and interactions with other pollutants [150]. The persistence of NPs in the environment poses a risk of chronic exposure with unknown ecological consequences [151,152,153].
To address these challenges, it is important to develop environmentally friendly NPs that degrade into non-toxic byproducts [154] and to implement controlled release mechanisms. The use of nutrients such as proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates to make NPs for fish feed is environmentally advantageous. These biocompatible nutrients can create NPs that degrade naturally in the environment, reducing the risk of persistence and accumulation. Additionally, nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed can reduce feed wastage and pollution by improving digestibility and nutrient absorption [155], which lowers waste excretion and decreases the organic load in aquaculture systems. This approach not only supports sustainable aquaculture practices but also contributes to minimizing nutrient runoff and water pollution [21,156]. The antimicrobial properties of NPs might reduce the need for antibiotics, mitigating resistance and reducing pharmaceutical residues in water bodies.
Implementing best management practices in aquaculture and establishing robust regulatory frameworks are crucial for the safe application of nanoparticles in fish feed. This includes the comprehensive testing of their properties, environmental impact, and effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health.

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed represents an innovative advancement in aquaculture that can potentially provide numerous benefits. However, despite the use of safe ingredients in NP production, the small size and high surface area-to-volume ratio of NPs can pose potentially toxic effects, necessitating comprehensive safety assessments.
Future research should focus on safety and environmental impact, regulation and standardization, targeted and controlled release, and integration with other technologies. Extensive studies are needed to assess the long-term safety of NPs, including their effects on fish health, human consumers, and the aquatic environment. Developing environmentally friendly and biodegradable nanoparticles is crucial. Establishing clear regulatory frameworks and standards will ensure safe and effective applications, including guidelines for nanoparticle synthesis, feed formulation, and usage protocols.
Advances in NP engineering should improve targeted and controlled release mechanisms to maximize nutrient bioavailability and therapeutic effects while minimizing adverse impacts on beneficial gut microbiota. Combining NP technology with probiotics, prebiotics, and plant-based ingredients can enhance fish health and growth, contributing to a sustainable and resilient aquaculture industry. Addressing these challenges and leveraging nanoparticles’ potential can significantly improve productivity, sustainability, and fish welfare, supporting global food security and environmental health.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

New data were not generated for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Blue Transformation in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hossain, M.S.; Small, B.C.; Kumar, V.; Hardy, R. Utilization of functional feed additives to produce cost-effective, ecofriendly aquafeeds high in plant-based ingredients. Rev. Aquac. 2024, 16, 121–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zlaugotne, B.; Pubule, J.; Blumberga, D. Advantages and disadvantages of using more sustainable ingredients in fish feed. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Molina-Poveda, C. Nutrient requirements. In Aquafeed Formulation; Nates, S.F., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 75–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zarantoniello, M.; Pulido Rodriguez, L.F.; Randazzo, B.; Cardinaletti, G.; Giorgini, E.; Belloni, A.; Secci, G.; Faccenda, F.; Pulcini, D.; Parisi, G.; et al. Conventional feed additives or red claw crayfish meal and dried microbial biomass as feed supplement in fish meal-free diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Possible ameliorative effects on growth and gut health status. Aquaculture 2022, 554, 738137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hardy, R.W.; Kaushik, S.J.; Mai, K.; Bai, S.C. Fish nutrition—History and perspectives. In Fish Nutrition; Hardy, R.W., Kaushik, S.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. FAO. Fish as Feed Inputs for Aquaculture: Practices, Sustainability and Implications; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogmans, C.W.J.; van Soest, D. Can global aquaculture growth help to conserve wild fish stocks? Theory and empirical analysis. Nat. Resour. Model. 2022, 35, e12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Filipe, D.; Gonçalves, M.; Fernandes, H.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Peres, H.; Belo, I.; Salgado, J.M. Shelf-Life Performance of Fish Feed Supplemented with Bioactive Extracts from Fermented Olive Mill and Winery By-Products. Foods 2023, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nunes AJ, P.; Dalen, L.L.; Leonardi, G.; Burri, L. Developing sustainable, cost-effective and high-performance shrimp feed formulations containing low fish meal levels. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 27, 101422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uzochukwu, I.E.; Aba, P.E.; Ossai, N.I.; Ugwuoke, H.C.; Nyeste, K.; Machebe, N.S. Optimizing feed utilization and reducing deterioration of African catfish feed with sodium propionate supplementation. Aquac. Rep. 2023, 33, 101820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thangapandiyan, S.; Monika, S. Green Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles as Feed Additives to Improve Growth, Biochemical, and Hematological Parameters in Freshwater Fish Labeo rohita. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 195, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ibrahim, D.; Rahman, M.M.I.A.; El-ghany, A.M.A.; Hassanen, E.A.A.; Al-jabr, O.A.; El-Wahab, R.A.A.; Zayed, S.; Salem, M.A.E.K.; El_Tahawy, S.N.; Youssef, W.; et al. Chlorella vulgaris extract conjugated magnetic iron nanoparticles in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Growth promoting, immunostimulant and antioxidant role and combating against the synergistic infection with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis and Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 145, 109352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adel, M.; Sakhaie, F.; Shekarabi, S.P.H.; Gholamhosseini, A.; Impellitteri, F.; Faggio, C. Dietary Mentha piperita essential oil loaded in chitosan nanoparticles mediated the growth performance and humoral immune responses in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 145, 109321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Asad, F.; Batool, N.; Nadeem, A.; Bano, S.; Anwar, N.; Jamal, R.; Ali, S. Fe-NPs and Zn-NPs: Advancing Aquaculture Performance Through Nanotechnology. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 202, 2828–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahmed, M.T.; Ali, M.S.; Ahamed, T.; Suraiya, S.; Haq, M. Exploring the aspects of the application of nanotechnology system in aquaculture: A systematic review. Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 4177–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Menichetti, A.; Mavridi-Printezi, A.; Mordini, D.; Montalti, M. Effect of Size, Shape and Surface Functionalization on the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vreeland, E.C.; Watt, J.; Schober, G.B.; Hance, B.G.; Austin, M.J.; Price, A.D.; Fellows, B.D.; Monson, T.C.; Hudak, N.S.; Maldonado-Camargo, L.; et al. Enhanced Nanoparticle Size Control by Extending LaMer’s Mechanism. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 6059–6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arya, S.; Mahajan, P.; Mahajan, S.; Khosla, A. Influence of Processing Parameters to Control Morphology and Optical Properties of Sol-Gel Synthesized ZnO Nanoparticles. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 023002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mekuye, B.; Abera, B. Nanomaterials: An overview of synthesis, classification, characterization, and applications. Nano Sel. 2023, 4, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fajardo, C.; Martinez-rodriguez, G.; Blasco, J.; Miguel, J.; Thomas, B.; De Donato, M. Nanotechnology in aquaculture: Applications, perspectives and regulatory challenges. Aquac. Fish. 2022, 7, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dumlu, B. Importance of Nano-Sized Feed Additives in Animal Nutrition. J. Agric. Prod. 2024, 5, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hussain, S.M.; Naeem, E.; Ali, S.; Paray, B.A.; Adrees, M.; Naeem, A. Evaluation of growth, nutrient absorption, body composition and blood indices under dietary exposure of iron oxide nanoparticles in Common carp (Cyprinus carpio). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 108, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lawson, Z.R.; Xu, K.; Boukouvala, C.; Hughes, R.A.; Rosenberger, M.R.; Neretina, S. Large-area arrays of epitaxially aligned silver nanotriangles seeded by gold nanostructures. Mater. Chem. Front. 2024, 8, 2149–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dubey, P.; Pathan, S.; Pusplata, P.; Tadge, P.; Ray, S. Recent Advances In Template Assisted Growth Engineering of Inorganic Nanocrystals. ECS Trans. 2022, 107, 20085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, J.; Chen, J.; Gao, L.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Xiao, Q.; Lee, S.S.; Chen, X. Engineered nanomedicines with enhanced tumor penetration. Nano Today 2019, 29, 100800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hadji, H.; Bouchemal, K. Effect of micro- and nanoparticle shape on biological processes. J. Control. Release 2022, 342, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, W.; Taheri-ledari, R.; Ganjali, F.; Mirmohammadi, S.S.; Qazi, F.S.; Saeidirad, M.; KashtiAray, A.; Zarei-Shokat, S.; Tian, Y.; Maleki, A. Effects of morphology and size of nanoscale drug carriers on cellular uptake and internalization process: A review. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2023, 13, 80–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. El-shafai, N.M.; El-mehasseb, I.M.; Shukry, M.; Farrag, F.; Ibrahim, M.; Ramadan, M.S.; Dawood , M.A.O.; Moustafa, E.M.; El-Kemary, M.A. Influence nanohybrid of ([email protected]) for enhancing the fish production wealth and economical return via the improvement dietary, immunity, physiological and antioxidant activity on Nile Tilapia. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 266, 124536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, L.; Wu, Z.; Ma, Y. Preparation and growth-promoting effect of selenium nanoparticles capped by polysaccharide-protein complexes on tilapia. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 2021, 101, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ni, J.; Ren, L.; Ma, Y.; Xiong, H.; Jian, W. Selenium nanoparticles coated with polysaccharide-protein complexes from abalone viscera improve growth and enhance resistance to diseases and hypoxic stress in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023, 134, 108624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guo, S.; Liang, Y.; Liu, L.; Yin, M.; Wang, A.; Sun, K.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y. Research on the fate of polymeric nanoparticles in the process of the intestinal absorption based on model nanoparticles with various characteristics: Size, surface charge and pro-hydrophobics. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vibhute, P.; Jaabir, M.; Sivakamavalli, J. Applications of nanoparticles in aquaculture. In Nanotechnological Approaches to the Advancement of Innovations in Aquaculture; Kirthi, A., Loganathan, K., Karunasagar, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 127–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dasari, R.; Prasanna, A.; Khateef, R. Role of nanoparticles in fish disease management: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 58, 103218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vijayaram, S.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Vuppala, S.; Nedaei, S.; Mahendran, K. Selenium Nanoparticles: Revolutionizing Nutrient Enhancement in Aquaculture—A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahmed, J.; Kumaraguru, V.K.P.; Ramalingam, K. Nanoencapsulated Aquafeeds and Current Uses in Fisheries/Shrimps: A Review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 195, 7110–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Almeida, C.F.; Faria, M.; Carvalho, J.; Pinho, E. Contribution of nanotechnology to greater efficiency in animal nutrition and production. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Faizan, M.; Singh, A.; Eren, A.; Sultan, H.; Sharma, M.; Djalovic, I.; Trivan, G. Small molecule, big impacts: Nano-nutrients for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 301, 154305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Vijayaram, S.; Tsigkou, K.; Zuorro, A.; Sun, Y.; Rabetafika, H.; Razafindralambo, H. Inorganic nanoparticles for use in aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 1600–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ibrahim, R.E.; Fouda, M.M.S.; Younis, E.M.; Abdelwarith, A.A.; Salem, G.A.; Elkady, A.A.; Ismail, S.H.; Davies, S.J.; Rahman, A.N.A. The anti-bacterial efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by Nelumbo nucifera leaves against Clostridium perfringes challenge in Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2024, 578, 740030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sherif, A.H.; Abdelsalam, M.; Ali, N.G.; Mahrous, K.F. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Boost the Immune Responses in Oreochromis niloticus and Improve Disease Resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila Infection. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ghazi, S.; Diab, A.M.; Khalafalla, M.M.; Mohamed, R.A. Synergistic Effects of Selenium and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Growth Performance, Hemato-biochemical Profile, Immune and Oxidative Stress Responses, and Intestinal Morphometry of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ibrahim, M.S.; El-gendi, G.M.I.; Ahmed, A.I.; El-haroun, E.R.; Hassaan, M.S. Nano Zinc versus Bulk Zinc Form as Dietary Supplied: Effects on Growth, Intestinal Enzymes and Topography, and Hemato-biochemical and Oxidative Stress Biomarker in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Silva, V.F.; Tedesco, M.; Fontes, S.T.; Owatari, M.S.; Gatto, Y.M.G.; Ferreira, M.B.; dos Santos, P.C.; Costa, G.A.C.; Palmieri, A.F.; dos Santos, G.G.; et al. Effects of supplementation with different zinc-based products on the growth and health of Nile tilapia. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 149, 109534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yaqub, A.; Nasir, M.; Kamran, M.; Majeed, I.; Arif, A. Immunomodulation, Fish Health and Resistance to Staphylococcus aureus of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fed Diet Supplemented with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Zinc Acetate. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 4912–4925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Diab, A.M.; Shokr, B.T.; Shukry, M.; Farrag, F.A.; Mohamed, R.A. Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Green-Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Candidiasis Control in Oreochromis niloticus. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 4126–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmed, S.A.A.; Ibrahim, R.E.; Younis, E.M.; Abdelwarith, A.A.; Faroh, K.Y.; El Gamal, S.A.; Badr, S.; Khamis, T.; Mansour, A.T.; Davies, S.J.; et al. Antagonistic Effect of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Dietary Supplementation Against Chronic Copper Waterborne Exposure on Growth, Behavioral, Biochemical, and Gene Expression Alterations of African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ebrahimi, P.; Changizi, R.; Ghobadi, S.; Shohreh, P.; Vatandoust, S. Effect of Nano-Fe as Feed Supplement on Growth Performance, Survival Rate, Blood Parameters and Immune Functions of the Stellate Sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus). Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2020, 46, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mohammady, E.Y.; Elashry, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.S.; Elarian, M.; Salem, S.M.R.; El-Haroun, E.R.; Hassaan, M.S. Nano Iron versus Bulk Iron Forms as Functional Feed Additives: Growth, Body Indices, Hematological Assay, Plasma Metabolites, Immune, Anti-oxidative Ability, and Intestinal Morphometric Measurements of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Elabd, H.; Youssuf, H.; Mahboub, H.H.; Salem, S.M.R.; Husseiny, A.; Khalid, A.; El-Desouky, H.S.; Faggio, C. Growth, hemato-biochemical, immune-antioxidant response, and gene expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) received nano iron oxide-incorporated diets. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 128, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Paulpandian, P.; Sulaikal, I.; Beena, B.; Ramesh, S.; Kamatchi, K.; Paulraj, B. Impact of Camellia sinensis Iron Oxide Nanoparticle on Growth, Hemato-biochemical and Antioxidant Capacity of Blue Gourami (Trichogaster trichopterus) Fingerlings. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nirmalkar, R.; Suresh, E.; Felix, N.; Kathirvelpandian, A.; Nazir, M.I.; Ranjan, A. Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles Using Sargassum wightii Extract and Its Impact on Serum Biochemical Profile and Growth Response of Etroplus suratensis Juveniles. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thangapandiyan, S.; Alisha, A.S.A.; Anidha, K. Growth performance, hematological and biochemical effects of iron oxide nanoparticles in Labeo rohita. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 25, 101582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Radwan, M.; Moussa, M.A.; Manaa, E.A.; El-sharkawy, M.A.; Darweesh, K.F.; Elraey, S.M.A.; Saleh, N.A.; Mohammadein, A.; Al-Otaibi, W.M.; Albadrani, G.M.; et al. Synergistic effect of green synthesis magnesium oxide nanoparticles and seaweed extract on improving water quality, health benefits, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 280, 116522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Deng, Y.; He, C.; Liu, W.; Li, X. The Benefits of Nanosized Magnesium Oxide in Fish Megalobrama amblycephala: Evidence in Growth Performance, Redox Defense, Glucose Metabolism, and Magnesium Homeostasis. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thabet, S.R.; Abdel-Galil, M.A.; Osman, A.S.; Ahmed, N.S.; Mousa, M.A. Biochemical effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in clarias gariepinus. Sohag J. Jr. Sci. Res. 2021, 1, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu, J.; Zhao, T.; Luo, Z.; Zhong, C.; Zheng, H.; Tan, X. Effects of dietary supplementation with manganese dioxide nanoparticles on growth, Mn metabolism and kidney health of yellow catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco. Aquac. Rep. 2023, 33, 101815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Soundhariya, N. Different quantities of manganese oxide nanoparticles incorporated feed on the growth and haematological traits of common carp Cyprinus carpio var. communis. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2023, 9411, 1587–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ramdas, R.; Tukaram, S.; Chandramore, K.; Sammi, K.; Kumar, N. Dietary manganese nano-particles improves gene regulation and biochemical attributes for mitigation of lead and ammonia toxicity in fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C 2024, 276, 109818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rajan, M.R.; Sudhabose, S.; Barween, S.R. Multifarious Magnitude of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Integrated Feed on Growth and Hematological Characteristics of Mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala. J. Toxicol. 2023, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kumar, N.; Thorat, S.T.; Singh, A.K. Manganese nanoparticles control the gene regulations against multiple stresses in Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Dawood, M.A.O.; Eweedah, N.M.; Moustafa, E.M.; El-Sharawy, M.E.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Atia, M.H. Copper Nanoparticles Mitigate the Growth, Immunity, and Oxidation Resistance in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 198, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Delavari, N.M.; Gharaei, A.; Mirdar, H.J.; Davari, A.; Rastiannasab, A. Modulatory effect of dietary copper nanoparticles and vitamin C supplementations on growth performance, hematological and immune parameters, oxidative status, histology, and disease resistance against Yersinia ruckeri in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 48, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumar, N.; Thorat, S.T.; Gite, A.; Patole, P.B. Nano-copper Enhances Gene Regulation of Non-specific Immunity and Antioxidative Status of Fish Reared Under Multiple Stresses. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 4926–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kaleeswaran, C.; Senthamarai, M.D.; Rajan, M.R. Evaluation of disparate multiplicities of copper oxide nanoparticles integrated feed on the growth and hematology of koi carp. J. Toxicol. Stud. 2024, 2, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dawood, M.A.O.; Alagawany, M.; Sewilam, H. The Role of Zinc Microelement in Aquaculture: A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 3841–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lall, S.P.; Kaushik, S.J. Nutrition and Metabolism of Minerals in Fish. Animals 2021, 11, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thwaite, R.; Ji, J.; Torrealba, D.; Coll, J.; Sabés, M.; Villaverde, A.; Roher, N. Protein Nanoparticles Made of Recombinant Viral Antigens: A Promising Biomaterial for Oral Delivery of Fish Prophylactics. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumaran, S.; Anahas, A.M.P.; Prasannabalaji, N.; Karthiga, M.; Bharathi, S.; Rajasekar, T.; Joseph, J.; Prasad, S.G.; Pandian, S.K.; Pugazhvendan, S.R.; et al. Chitin derivatives of NAG and chitosan nanoparticles from marine disposal yards and their use for economically feasible fish feed development. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Summer, M.; Ali, S.; Muhammad, H.; Rimsha, T.; Umaima, A. Mode of Action of Biogenic Silver, Zinc, Copper, Titanium and Cobalt Nanoparticles against Antibiotics Resistant Pathogens; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; Volume 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Metryka, O.; Wasilkowski, D.; Mrozik, A. Undesirable consequences of the metallic nanoparticles action on the properties and functioning of Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus epidermidis membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 446, 130728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Al-Wrafy, F.A.; Al-Gheethi, A.A.; Ponnusamy, S.K.; Noman, E.A.; Fattah, S.A. Nanoparticles approach to eradicate bacterial biofilm-related infections: A critical review. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mondal, S.K.; Chakraborty, S.; Manna, S.; Mandal, S.M. Antimicrobial nanoparticles: Current landscape and future challenges. RSC Pharm. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mokhtari, H.; Abdulrazaq, T.; Somayeh, A.; Tooba, A.; Salehzadeh, A. Synergic Antibiofilm Effect of Thymol and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Conjugated with Thiosemicarbazone on Pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2024, 49, 9089–9097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khan, M.Z.H.; Hossain, M.M.M.; Khan, M.; Ali, M.S.; Aktar, S.; Moniruzzaman, M. Influence of nanoparticle-based nano-nutrients on the growth performance and physiological parameters in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 29918–29922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mukherjee, K.; Saha, A.; Bhattacharjee, S. Nanoscale iron for sustainable aquaculture and beyond. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 44, 102440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chandrapalan, T.; Kwong, R.W.M. Functional significance and physiological regulation of essential trace metals in fish. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224, jeb238790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kumari, A.; Kumar, A. Iron nanoparticles as a promising compound for food fortification in iron deficiency anemia: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 3319–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Abdel, A.N.; Masoud, S.R.; Fouda, M.M.S.; Abdelwarith, A.A.; Younis, E.M.; Khalil, S.S.; Zaki, H.T.; Mohammed, E.; Davies, S.J.; Ibrahim, R.E. Antimicrobial efficacy of magnetite nanoparticles against Aeromonas sobria challenge in African catfish: Biochemical, protein profile, and immuno-antioxidant indices. Aquac. Rep. 2023, 32, 101692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rondanelli, M.; Faliva, M.A.; Tartara, A.; Gasparri, C.; Perna, S.; Infantino, V.; Riva, A.; Petrangolini, G.; Peroni, G. An update on magnesium and bone health. BioMetals 2021, 34, 715–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Yu, L.; Li, L.; Yu, H.; Yuan, Z.; Ma, C.; Wu, X.; Kong, W. Effects of dietary manganese supplementation on the growth performance, tissue manganese content and antioxidant capacity of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) post-smolts. Aquac. Rep. 2024, 34, 101924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gatou, M.; Skylla, E.; Dourou, P.; Pippa, N.; Gazouli, M.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A. Magnesium Oxide (MgO) Nanoparticles: Synthetic Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Crystals 2024, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sudhabose, S.; Sooryakanth, B.; Rajan, M.R. Impact of acute and sub-acute exposure of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, D.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, H. Effect of Dietary Manganese on the Growth Performance, Lipid Metabolism, and Antioxidant Capacity in the Post-Larval Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Animals 2023, 13, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. EL-Erian, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.S.; Salem, S.M.R.; Mohammady, E.Y.; El-Haroun, E.R.; Hassaan, M.S. Evaluation of Different Copper Sources in Nile Tilapia Diets: Growth, Body Indices, Hematological Assay, Plasma Metabolites, Immune, Anti-Oxidative Ability, and Intestinal Morphometric Measurements. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 4900–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhong, C.C.; Ke, J.; Song, C.C.; Tan, X.Y.; Xu, Y.C.; Lv, W.H.; Song, Y.-F.; Luo, Z. Effects of dietary copper (Cu) on growth performance, body composition, mineral content, hepatic histology and Cu transport of the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2023, 574, 739638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kumar, N.; Thorat, S.T.; Chavhan, S.R. Multifunctional role of dietary copper to regulate stress-responsive gene for mitigation of multiple stresses in Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Gao, C.; Wang, C.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, F. Dietary copper for fish: Homeostasis, nutritional functions, toxicity, and affecting factors. Aquaculture 2024, 587, 740875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Scott, A.; Vadalasetty, K.P.; Chwalibog, A.; Sawosz, E. Copper nanoparticles as an alternative feed additive in poultry diet: A review. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2018, 7, 69–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Afshari, A.; Sourinejad, I.; Gharaei, A.; Johari, S.A.; Ghasemi, Z. The effects of diet supplementation with inorganic and nanoparticulate iron and copper on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, antioxidant response and immune function of snow trout Schizothorax zarudnyi (Nikolskii, 1897). Aquaculture 2021, 539, 736638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eissa, E.H.; Bazina, W.K.; El-Aziz, Y.M.A.; Elghany, N.A.A.; Tawfik, W.A.; Mossa, M.I.; El Megeed, O.H.A.; El-Hamed, N.N.B.A.; El-Saeed, A.F.; El-Haroun, E.; et al. Nano-selenium impacts on growth performance, digestive enzymes, antioxidant, immune resistance and histopathological scores of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus against Aspergillus flavus infection. Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 1587–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sheikh, S.; Ghojoghi, F.; Ghelichi, A.; Jorjani, S. Dietary Effects of Selenium Nanoparticles on Growth Performance, Survival Rate, Chemical Composition, and Muscle Bioaccumulation of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 2308–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sherif, A.H.; Zommara, M.A. Selenium Nanoparticles Ameliorate Adverse Impacts of Aflatoxin in Nile Tilapia with Special Reference to Streptococcus agalactiae Infection. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhu, C.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Zheng, L.; He, S.; Yang, F.; Ji, H.; Dong, W. Selenium nanoparticles in aquaculture: Unique advantages in the production of Se-enriched grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Anim. Nutr. 2024, 16, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mohtashemipour, H.; Mohammadian, T.; Mozanzadeh, M.T.; Mesbah, M.; Nejad, A.J. Dietary Selenium Nanoparticles Improved Growth and Health Indices in Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer) Juveniles Reared in High Saline Water. Aquac. Nutr. 2024, 2024, 7480824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Abdollahi-mousavi, S.E.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Mozanzadeh, M.T. Exploring the effects and possible mechanisms of nutritional selenium nanoparticles on production performance and stress recovery in the Arabian yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus arabicus) model. Aquac. Rep. 2024, 36, 102051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Abdollahi-mousavi, S.E.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Mozanzadeh, M.T. Efficacy of nutritional selenium nanoparticles on growth performance, immune response, antioxidant capacity, expression of growth and immune-related genes, and post-stress recovery in juvenile Sobaity seabream (Sparidentex hasta). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 147, 109452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Santillan, E.; Yasumaru, F.; Vethathirri, R.S.; Thi, S.S.; Hoon, H.Y.; Chan, D.; Sian, D.C.P.; Wuertz, S. Microbial community-based protein from soybean-processing wastewater as a sustainable alternative fish feed ingredient. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yuan, D.; Zhou, F.; Shen, P.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, L. Self-assembled soy protein nanoparticles by partial enzymatic hydrolysis for pH-Driven Encapsulation and Delivery of Hydrophobic Cargo Curcumin. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yostawonkul, J.; Kitiyodom, S.; Supchukun, K.; Thumrongsiri, N.; Saengkrit, N.; Pinpimai, K.; Hajitou, A.; Thompson, K.D.; Rattanapinyopituk, K.; Maita, M.; et al. Masculinization of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Using 17 α-Methyltestosterone-Loaded Alkyl Polyglucosides Integrated into Nanostructured Lipid Carriers. Animals 2023, 13, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Trapani, A.; Esteban, M.Á.; Curci, F.; Manno, D.E.; Serra, A.; Fracchiolla, G.; Espinosa-Ruiz, C.; Castellani, S.; Conese, M. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Administering Antioxidant Grape Seed-Derived Polyphenol Compounds: A Potential Application in Aquaculture. Molecules 2022, 27, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bunnoy, A.; Thangsunan, P.; Chokmangmeepisarn, P.; Yata, T.; Klongklaew, N.; Pirarat, N.; Espinosa-Ruiz, C.; Castellani, S.; Conese, M. Mucoadhesive cationic lipid-based Flavobacterium oreochromis nanoencapsulation enhanced the efficacy of mucoadhesive immersion vaccination against columnaris disease and strengthened immunity in Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 127, 633–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Nuzaiba, P.M.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, S.; Jadhao, S.B. Synthesis of L-methionine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for controlled release and their in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abd El-Naby, A.S.; Al-Sagheer, A.A.; Negm, S.S.; Naiel, M.A.E. Dietary combination of chitosan nanoparticle and thymol affects feed utilization, digestive enzymes, antioxidant status, and intestinal morphology of Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2020, 515, 734577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Naiel, M.A.E.; Ismael, N.E.M.; Abd El-hameed, S.A.A.; Amer, M.S. The antioxidative and immunity roles of chitosan nanoparticle and vitamin C-supplemented diets against imidacloprid toxicity on Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2020, 523, 735219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sabra, M.S.; El-Aal, M.A.; Idriss, S.K.A.; Soliman, H.A.M.; Salaah, S.M.; Sayed, A.E.D.H. Possible beneficial effects of nano chitosan against doxycycline toxicity in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2024, 587, 740855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Saleh, M.; Essawy, E.; Shaalan, M.; Osman, S.; Ahmed, F.; El-matbouli, M. Therapeutic Intervention with Dietary Chitosan Nanoparticles Alleviates Fish Pathological and Molecular Systemic Inflammatory Responses against Infections. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Khan, K.U.; Zuberi, A. An overview of the ongoing insights in selenium research and its role in fish nutrition and fish health. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 43, 1689–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Khalil, H.S.; Abdel-tawwab, M. Embracing nanotechnology for selenium application in aquafeeds. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 112–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kianfar, E. Protein nanoparticles in drug delivery: Animal protein, plant proteins and protein cages, albumin nanoparticles. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Han, M.; Liu, K.; Liu, X.; Rashid, M.T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M. Research Progress of Protein-Based Bioactive Substance Nanoparticles. Foods 2023, 12, 2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Klojdová, I.; Milota, T.; Smetanová, J.; Stathopoulos, C. Encapsulation: A Strategy to Deliver Therapeutics and Bioactive Compounds? Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gong, H.; Fu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Cai, L.; Chen, J.; Yu, H.; Lyu, B. Preparation of soybean protein-based nanoparticles and its application as encapsulation carriers of bioactive substances. LWT 2024, 191, 115680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Agriopoulou, S.; Tarapoulouzi, M.; Varzakas, T.; Jafari, S.M. Application of Encapsulation Strategies for Probiotics: From Individual Loading to Co-Encapsulation. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tian, M.; Cheng, J.; Guo, M. Stability, Digestion, and Cellular Transport of Soy Isoflavones Nanoparticles Stabilized by Polymerized Goat Milk Whey Protein. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bhoopathy, S.; Inbakandan, D. Curcumin loaded chitosan nanoparticles fortify shrimp feed pellets with enhanced antioxidant activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 120, 111737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Harshitha, M.; Nayak, A.; Disha, S.; Akshath, U.S.; Dubey, S.; Mweemba, H.; Chakraborty, A.; Karunasagar, I.; Maiti, B. Nanovaccines to Combat Aeromonas hydrophila Infections in Warm-Water Aquaculture: Opportunities and Challenges. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Lu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q. A Review on Polymer and Lipid-Based Nanocarriers and Its Application to Nano-Pharmaceutical and Food-Based Systems. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 783831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ashfaq, R.; Rasul, A.; Asghar, S.; Kov, A.; Berk, S. Lipid Nanoparticles: An Effective Tool to Improve the Bioavailability of Nutraceuticals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gabriel, N.N.; Habte-Tsion, H.-M.; Haulofu, M. Perspectives of nanotechnology in aquaculture: Fish nutrition, disease, and water treatment. In Emerging Nanomaterials for Advanced Technologies. Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences; Krishnan, A., Ravindran, B., Balasubramanian, B., Swart, H., Panchu, S., Prasad, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 463–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Araujo, J.M.; Fortes-silva, R.; Pola, C.C.; Yamamoto, F.Y.; Gatlin, D.M.; Gomes, C.L. Delivery of selenium using chitosan nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant and growth effects in Nile tilapia (Orechromis niloticus). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ali, N.G.; Ali, T.E.S.; Aboyadak, I.M.; Elbakry, M.A. Controlling Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Oreochromis niloticus spawners by cefotaxime sodium. Aquaculture 2021, 544, 737107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Oniha, M.I.; Oyesola, O.L.; Taiwo, O.S.; Oyejide, S.O.; Akindana, S.A.; Christiana Oluwatoyin Ajanaku, P.O.I. Nanochitosan-Based Fish Disease Prevention and Control. In Nanochitosan-Based Enhancement of Fisheries and Aquaculture; Isibor, P.O., Adeogun, A.O., Enuneku, A.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Olaniyan, O.T.; Adetunji, C.O.; Dare, A.; Adeniyi, M.J.; Ajayi, O.O. Application of nanochitosan and polymeric chitosan as antibacterial, antivirus and antifungal activities when incorporated into aquatic and animal-based food materials. In Next Generation Nanochitosan; Adetunji, C., Hefft, D., Jeevanandam, J., Danquah, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. El-gazzar, N.; Elez, R.M.M.A.; Attia, A.S.A.; Darwish, M.M.; Younis, E.M.; Eltahlawi, R.A.; Mohamed, K.I.; Davies, S.J.; Elsohaby, I. Antifungal and antibiofilm effects of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius, zinc nanoparticles, and zinc nanocomposites against Candida albicans from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), water and humans. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1358270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Elabd, H.; Mahboub, H.H.; Salem, S.M.R.; Abdelwahab, A.M.; Alwutayd, K.M.; Shaalan, M.; Ismail, S.H.; Abdelfattah, A.M.; Khalid, A.; Mansour, A.T.; et al. Nano-Curcumin/Chitosan Modulates Growth, Biochemical, Immune, and Antioxidative Profiles, and the Expression of Related Genes in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fishes 2023, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Abinaya, M.; Shanthi, S.; Palmy, J.; Al-ghanim, K.A.; Govindarajan, M.; Vaseeharan, B. Exopolysaccharides-Mediated ZnO Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Aquatic Diseases in Freshwater Fish Oreochromis mossambicus. Toxics 2023, 11, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tayel, A.A.; El-madawy, K.M.; Moussa, S.H.; Assas, M.A. Application of Cystoseira myrica phycosynthesized selenium nanoparticles incorporated with nano-chitosan to control a fl atoxigenic fungi in fish feed. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 7678–7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hashem, N.M.; Hosny, N.S.; El-Desoky, N.; Soltan, Y.A.; Elolimy, A.A.; Sallam, S.M.A.; Abu-Tor, E.-S.M. Alginate Nanoencapsulated Synbiotic Composite of Pomegranate Peel Phytogenics and Multi-Probiotic Species as a Potential Feed Additive: Physicochemical, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activitie. Animals 2023, 13, 2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Latham, R.L.; Boyle, J.T.; Barbano, A.; Loveman, W.G.; Brown, N.A. Diverse mycotoxin threats to safe food and feed cereals. Essays Biochem. 2023, 67, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  131. Assadpour, E.; Jafari, S.M. A systematic review on nanoencapsulation of food bioactive ingredients and nutraceuticals by various nanocarriers. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3129–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Shah, M.A.; Mir, S.A.; Bashir, M. Nanoencapsulation of Food Ingredients; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  133. Dube, E.; Okuthe, G.E. Engineered nanoparticles in aquatic systems: Toxicity and mechanism of toxicity in fish. Emerg. Contam. 2023, 9, 100212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Paolino, D.; Mancuso, A.; Cristiano, M.C.; Froiio, F.; Lammari, N.; Celia, C.; Fresta, M. Nanonutraceuticals: The New Frontier of Supplementary Food. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Abbasi, R.; Shineh, G.; Mobaraki, M.; Doughty, S.; Tayebi, L. Structural Parameters of Nanoparticles Affecting Their Toxicity for Biomedical Applications: A Review; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; Volume 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hedayati, S.A.; Yousefi, M.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Yarahmadi, P.; Mahmoudi, S.S.; Van Doan, H. Toxic and bioaccumulative effects of zinc nanoparticle exposure to goldfish, Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758). Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 46, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Qin, C.; Du, Q.; Luo, H.; Lin, J.; Li, M.; Xu, Y. Mitigation effects of humic acid on toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) on zebrafish (Danio rerio). Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2022, 17, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  138. Deepa, S.; Murugananthkumar, R.; Gupta, Y.R.; K.S, M.G.; Senthilkumaran, B. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and zinc sulfate on the testis of common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Nanotoxicology 2019, 13, 240–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ibrahim, M.S.; Gendy, G.M.E.; Ahmed, A.I.; Elharoun, E.R.; Hassaan, M.S. Nanoselenium versus bulk selenium as a dietary supplement: Effects on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal histology, biochemical and oxidative stress biomarkers in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) fingerlings. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 5642–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Seyedi, J.; Reza, M.; Esmaeilbeigi, M.; Tayemeh, M.B.; Moghadam, J.A. Toxicity and deleterious impacts of selenium nanoparticles at supranutritional and imbalance levels on male goldfish (Carassius auratus) sperm. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 66, 126758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Martínez, G.; Merinero, M.; Pérez-Aranda, M.; Pérez-Soriano, E.M.; Ortiz, T.; Villamor, E.; Begines, B.; Alcudia, A. Erratum: Guillermo M.; et al. Environmental Impact of Nanoparticles’ Application as an Emerging Technology: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Arienzo, M.; Ferrara, L. Environmental Fate of Metal Nanoparticles in Estuarine Environments. Water 2022, 14, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Petrovic, S.; Bita, B. Nanoformulations in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications: Green Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Peng, X.; Fang, J.; Lou, C.; Yang, L.; Shan, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Li, X. Engineered nanoparticles for precise targeted drug delivery and enhanced therapeutic efficacy in cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 3432–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Martínez-Ballesta, M.; Gil-Izquierdo, Á.; García-Viguera, C.; Domínguez-Perles, R. Nanoparticles and Controlled Delivery for Bioactive Compounds: Outlining Challenges for New “Smart-Foods” for Health. Foods 2018, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yu, X.; El-Aty, A.M.A.; Su, W.; Tan, M. Advancements in precision nutrition: Steady-state targeted delivery of food functional factors for nutrition intervention of chronic diseases. Food Saf. Health 2023, 1, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Amin, N.; Vedi, F.; Wais, M.N.; Zulkifli, S.Z.; Azmai, M.N.A.; Ismail, A. Developmental Toxicity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on the Early Life Stage of Java Medaka (Oryzias javanicus Bleeker, 1856). Trop. Agric. Sci. 2024, 47, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Casiano-muñiz, I.M.; Ortiz-rom, M.I. Synthesis, Characterization, and Ecotoxicology Assessment of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles by In Vivo Models. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Shanmugam, K.; Jeyaraman, P. Nanoparticles in Aquatic Ecosystems: Origins, Destiny and Ecological Consequences. Environ. Sci. Arch. 2024, 3, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Singh, S.; Mohan, S.; Gausiya, P. Fate and toxicity of nanoparticles in aquatic systems. Acta Geochim 2023, 42, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tran, T.; Nguyen, M.; Lin, C.; Hoang, T. Review on fate, transport, toxicity and health risk of nanoparticles in natural ecosystems: Emerging challenges in the modern age and solutions toward a sustainable environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Yamini, V.; Shanmugam, V.; Rameshpathy, M.; Venkatraman, G.; Ramanathan, G.; Al, H.; AL Garalleh, H.; Hashmi, A.; Brindhadevi, K.; Rajeswari, V.D. Environmental effects and interaction of nanoparticles on beneficial soil and aquatic microorganisms. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Mishra, S.; Sundaram, B. Fate, transport, and toxicity of nanoparticles: An emerging pollutant on biotic factors. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 174, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Vijayaram, S.; Razafindralambo, H.; Sun, Y.; Vasantharaj, S.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.M.R. Applications of Green Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles—A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 202, 360–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Arshad, R.; Gulshad, L.; Haq, U.; Farooq, M.A.; Al, A.; Siddique, F.R.; Manzoor, M.F.; Karrar, E. Nanotechnology: A novel tool to enhance the bioavailability of micronutrients. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 3354–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Handy, R.D.; Poxton, M.G. Nitrogen pollution in mariculture: Toxicity and excretion of nitrogenous compounds by marine fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1993, 3, 205–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characteristics of NPs and the potential benefits of nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed in aquaculture.
Figure 1. Characteristics of NPs and the potential benefits of nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed in aquaculture.
Fishes 09 00322 g001
Table 1. Effects of metal-based nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
Table 1. Effects of metal-based nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
NPFishDosageEffectsRef.
Zinc oxide NPs (ZnONPs)Labeo rohita10 mg/kg for 45 daysHigher improvement of growth and metabolic functions[12]
Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia)1.5 mg/LAntibacterial activity against Clostridium perfringes[40]
60 µg/g for 8 weeksBoost immune responses and improve disease resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila infection[41]
10 mg/kg for 60 daysImproved growth performance, blood health, intestinal histomorphology, and activated the oxidative stress response[42]
60 mg/kg for 84 daysBest growth, digestive enzyme activity, intestinal health, and improved antioxidant capacity.[43]
15 mg/kg for 60 daysInnate defense increased during Streptococcus agalactiae infection[44]
40 mg/kg for 8 weeksEnhanced health parameters, antioxidant capacity, immune response, and disease resistance[45]
40 mg/kg for 8 weeksSignificant improvement in the growth performance, survival, serum lysozyme activity, phagocytic activity, phagocytic index, respiratory burst activity, expression of immune-related genes, digestive enzyme activity, and histopathological findings in Candida albicans-infected fish[46]
Clarias gariepinus (African catfish)30 mg/kg for 60 daysAlleviated the negative impacts of chronic waterborne Cu exposure on growth performance, physiological changes, gene expression, and tissue architecture[47]
Iron oxide NPs
(Fe2O3-NPs)
Cyprinus carpio (common carp)40 mg/kg for 70 daysElevated growth, nutrient absorption, body composition and blood indices.[23]
Acipenser stellatus (stellate sturgeon)50 mg/kg for 60 daysImproved the welfare and survival of stellate sturgeon juveniles[48]
O. niloticus0.4 mg/kg for 12 weeksImproves immunological performance, filet composition, and the healthiness of the intestinal structure[49]
1 g/kg for 30 daysEnhanced properties of growth, hemato-biochemical, immune, and antioxidative profiles, and related genes’ expression of O. niloticus[50]
Trichogaster trichopterus (blue gourami)40 mg/kg for 60 daysEnhanced growth performance, improved biochemical constituents, better hematological parameters, and increased antioxidant activity[51]
Etroplus suratensis20 mg/kg for 60 daysImproved growth performance, nutrient utilization, and the health of E. suratensis.[52]
L. rohita10 mg/kg for 45 daysImproved growth performance[53]
Magnesium oxide NPs (MgO NPs)O. niloticus7.5 μg/mL for 60 daysImproved growth, health status, and increased the resistance of O. niloticus against bacterial and parasitic infection[54]
Megalobrama amblycephala (blunt snout bream)120 mg/kg for 12 weeksEnhanced growth performance and feed utilization[55]
C. gariepinus0.04 mg/kg for 60 daysSignificant improvement in body weight and antioxidant capacity[56]
Manganese dioxide NPs (MnO2NPs)Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (yellow catfish)13.6 mg/kg for 8 weeksBetter growth performance and feed utilization[57]
C. carpio6 mg/100 g for 21 daysEnhanced growth and hematological traits[58]
O. niloticus2 mg/kg for 38 daysImproved growth performance in under multiple stresses[59]
Cirrhinus cirrhosus (mrigal carp)75 mg/kg for 21 daysEnhanced Mrigal’s growth and decreased hematological criterion[60]
Pangasianodon hypophthalmus3 mg/kg for 105 daysControlled gene regulations against multiple stresses[61]
Copper NPs (CuNPs)C. carpio2.19 to 2.91 mg/kg for 8 weeksImproved growth performance, feed utilization, immune parameters, and oxidation resistance[62]
Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout)2 mg/kg for 60 daysElevated the growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and health of rainbow trout.[63]
Pangasianodon hypophthalmus1.5 mg/kgPromoted fish immunity, growth performance, and controlled gene regulation[64]
Copper oxide NPs (CuONPs)C. carpio200 mg/100 g for 21 daysImproved the growth performance of the Koi carp[65]
Table 2. Effects of non-metal-based nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
Table 2. Effects of non-metal-based nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
NPFishDosageEffectsRef.
Selenium NPs (SeNPs)O. niloticus1 mg/kgSignificant improvements in growth, feed efficiency, and survival rates.[91]
2 mg/kg for 56 daysImproved growth performance, survival, and chemical composition (protein). [92]
1 mg/kg for 4 weeksSeNPs could mitigate the oxidative stress induced by feeding the aflatoxin diet and could boost the immunity of stressed O. niloticus (Nile tilapia). [93]
0.1–1.2 mg/kgImproved growth performance and antioxidant capacity, stabilized the intestinal structure, and enhanced resistance to hypoxic stress and Streptococcus agalactiae-based infection of juvenile O. niloticus (Nile tilapia).[31]
Ctenopharyngodon idella (grass carp)0.3 mg/kg for 60 daysPromoted the growth and antioxidant capacity of grass carp, with excellent bioavailability of Se. [94]
Lates calcarifer (Asian seabass)4 mg/kg for 60 daysImproved growth and health indices in L. calcarifer juveniles.[95]
Acanthopagrus arabicus (Arabian yellowfin seabream)1 mg/kg for 60 daysEnhanced growth, immunity, and stress resistance.[96]
Sparidentex hasta (sobaity seabream)2 mg /kg for 60 daysPromoted growth performance and enhanced antioxidant and immune parameters in sobaity juveniles.[97]
Soy protein NPs (SPNPs)Lates calcarifer
(Asian sea bass)
50% of fishmeal protein replaced with single-cell protein (SCP) from soybean processing wastewater for 24 daysThe replacement of fishmeal protein with microbial community-based SCP did not affect Asian seabass growth or survival. [98]
-Dispersion gave 155.7 mg/L solubilized curcuminProtected curcumin from degradation or precipitation during simulated gastric-intestinal digestion, showing a significantly enhanced bioaccessibility.[99]
Protein NPsD. rerio (Zebrafish) and O. mykiss (rainbow trout) 20 μg/fishNanoparticles are taken up in vitro by zebrafish ZFL cells and in vivo by intubating zebrafish. NPs evoke an antiviral innate immune response in ZFL cells and in rainbow trout head kidney macrophages.[68]
Lipid-based NPs
(LNPs)
Oreochromis spp. (Red tilapia) 30 ppm for 21 daysAlkyl polyglucoside nanostructured lipid carriers achieved high encapsulation efficiency, thermal stability, and cost-effectiveness for the masculinization of tilapia with 17 alpha-methyltestosterone when delivered orally at 30 ppm for 21 days.[100]
Gilthead sea bream and European sea bass20 µg/mL for 24 hGrape seed extract (GSE) mixture containing several antioxidant compounds loaded on solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNPs) enhanced the viability and antioxidant properties of fish cells.[101]
Lates calcarifer (Asian sea bass)Mucoadhesive nano-encapsulated vaccine: water dilution of 1:100 (v/v) for 8 weeksMucoadhesive nano-encapsulated vaccine (cationic lipid-based nanoparticles combined with an antigen obtained from F. oreochromis) improved the efficiency of mucoadhesive vaccination against columnaris disease and strengthened immunity in Asian sea bass by increasing serum antibody levels, upregulating immune-related genes, and increasing survival.[102]
Chitosan-based NPs (CTNPs)L. rohita0.6% L-methionine in in total feed for 60 daysL-methionine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (M-CTNPs) exhibited the sustained and slow release of methionine over a prolonged period resulting in higher growth rates, improved protein efficiency, and enhanced sero-immunological test scores.[103]
O. niloticus (Nile tilapia) 1.0 g/kg of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (NAG)-loaded CTNPsNAG-loaded CTNPs significantly enhanced the immune-modulatory properties, growth performance, and disease resistance of O. niloticus (Nile tilapia). [69]
5 g/kg for 10 weeksImproved growth and some health indications.[104]
5 g/kg thymol and CTNPs mixture for 10 weeksThe synergistic effect of thymol combined with CTNPs enhanced feed utilization, protein utilization, the hematological profile, antioxidant enzymes, and intestine morphology.
5 g/kg CTNPs mixed with 250 or 500 mg vitamin C for 72 daysSignificant enhancement in all growth performance parameters, body indices, and survival rates.[105]
0.5% CTNPs in fish dietAlleviated doxycycline-induced toxicity in fish by controlling oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines.[106]
Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout)5 g/kg for 21 daysEnhanced resistance and inflammatory responses to infections. [107]
Table 3. Effects of composite and hybrid nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
Table 3. Effects of composite and hybrid nanoparticle-enhanced fish feed on various species at different dosages and durations.
NPFishDosageEffectsRef.
Se/ZnONPsOreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia)
O. niloticus
10 mg/kg for 60 daysSynergistic effects that improve growth performance, blood health, and intestinal histomorphology.[42]
ZnNPs/probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius composite-Antifungal and antibiofilm activities against Candida albicans from O. niloticus.[125]
Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets/ Se-ZnONPs1 mg/kg for 8 weeksEnhanced antioxidant activity and physiological functions; had efficient protein synthesis and increased fish weight.[29]
GO/ZnONPs nanocomposite
GO/SeNPs nanocompositeEnhanced antioxidant capacity and physiological functions.
Nano-curcumin/chitosan blend (NCur/CT)0.00625 + 0.5 g/kg diet for 4 weeksPromoted growth, digestion, immune status, liver function, antioxidant status, and related gene expression in O. niloticus.[126]
Exopolysaccharides/ZnONPsO. mossambicus10 mg/g for 30 daysImproved growth performance, lowered the death rate and improved the disease resistance of O. mossambicus on exposure to A. hydrophila and V. parahaemolyticus.[127]
Chitosan nanoparticles (CTNPs)/ SeNPs nanocompositeIn vitro study 50 μL of 1 g L−1Significantly reduced Aspergillus flavus count and growth. [128]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dube, E. Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed: Benefits and Challenges. Fishes 2024, 9, 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9080322

AMA Style

Dube E. Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed: Benefits and Challenges. Fishes. 2024; 9(8):322. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9080322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dube, Edith. 2024. "Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed: Benefits and Challenges" Fishes 9, no. 8: 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9080322

APA Style

Dube, E. (2024). Nanoparticle-Enhanced Fish Feed: Benefits and Challenges. Fishes, 9(8), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9080322

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop