Evolution of BIM to DTs: A Paradigm Shift for the Post-Pandemic AECO Industry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Historical Background
3.1. The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development
3.2. COVID-19 and Digital Transformation
4. The DTs Concept and Cutting-Edge Technology
4.1. Terminology and Definition
4.2. From BIM to DTs
4.2.1. Maturity Levels
4.2.2. Clarification of the Concept
5. DTs Platforms in the AECO Sector
5.1. DTs Components
5.2. DTs-based Applications
6. Opportunities and Challenges
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Elrefaey, O.; Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, I.; El-Sayegh, S. Impacts of COVID-19 on the Use of Digital Technology in Construction Projects in the UAE. Buildings 2022, 12, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Gao, S.; Mi, L.; Xing, J.; Shang, K.; Qiao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Ni, G.; Xu, N. Exploring the adoption of BIM amidst the COVID-19 crisis in China. Build. Res. Inf. 2021, 49, 930–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kor, M.; Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S. An investigation for integration of deep learning and digital twins towards Construction 4.0. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadehsalehi, S.; Hadavi, A.; Huang, J.C. From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 2020, 116, 103254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megahed, N.A.; Ghoneim, E.M. Antivirus-built environment: Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megahed, N.A.; Abdel-Kader, R.F. Smart Cities after COVID-19: Building a Conceptual Framework through a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Sci. Afr. 2022, 17, e01374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehata, A.O.; Megahed, N.A.; Shahda, M.M.; Hassan, A.M. (3Ts) Green conservation framework: A hierarchical-based sustainability approach. Build. Environ. 2022, 224, 109523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafsanjani, H.N.; Nabizadeh, A.H. Towards digital architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry through virtual design and construction (VDC) and digital twin. Energy Built Environ. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batty, M. Digital twins. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2018, 45, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, Q.; Parlikad, A.K.; Woodall, P.; Don Ranasinghe, G.; Xie, X.; Liang, Z.; Konstantinou, E.; Heaton, J.; Schooling, J. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of west Cambridge campus. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 05020004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opoku, D.J.; Perera, S.; Osei-Kyei, R.; Rashidi, M. Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Saini, P.K.; Lovati, M.; Han, M.; Huang, P.; Huang, Z. Digital twin for accelerating sustainability in positive energy district: A review of simulation tools and applications. Front. Sustain. Cities 2021, 3, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakicenovic, N.; Messner, D.; Zimm, C.; Clarke, G.; Rockström, J.; Aguiar, A.P.; Boza-Kiss, B.; Campagnolo, L.; Chabay, I.; Collste, D.; et al. The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges; Report Prepared by the World in 2050 Initiative; Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): Laxenburg, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Woodhead, R.; Stephenson, P.; Morrey, D. Digital construction: From point solutions to IoT ecosystem. Autom. Constr. 2018, 93, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrotter, G.; Hürzeler, C. The digital twin of the City of Zurich for urban planning. PFG J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 2020, 88, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciribini, A.L.; Ventura, S.M.; Paneroni, M. Implementation of an interoperable process to optimise design and construction phases of a residential building: A BIM Pilot Project. Autom. Constr. 2016, 71, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahda, M.M.; Adil, R. Effect of mass formation on indoor thermal performance in the Arab region. Port-Said Eng. Res. J. 2019, 23, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Shahda, M.M. Self-shading walls to improve environmental performance in desert buildings. Archit. Res. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Ismail, R.M.; Megahed, N.A.; Eltarabily, S. Numerical investigation of the indoor thermal behaviour based on PCMs in a hot climate. Archit. Sci. Rev. 2022, 65, 196–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noaman, D.S.; Moneer, S.A.; Megahed, N.A.; El-Ghafour, S.A. Integration of active solar cooling technology into passively designed facade in hot climates. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 56, 104658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahalingam, A.; Kashyap, R.; Mahajan, C. An evaluation of the applicability of 4D CAD on construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, S.R.; Megahed, N.A.; Abo Eleinen, O.M.; Hassan, A.M. Toward a national life cycle assessment tool: Generative design for early decision support. Energy Build. 2022, 267, 112144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jouan, P.; Hallot, P. Digital twin: Research framework to support preventive conservation policies. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marra, A.; Gerbino, S.; Greco, A.; Fabbrocino, G. Combining integrated informative system and historical digital twin for maintenance and preservation of artistic assets. Sensors 2021, 21, 5956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bock, T. The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Autom. Constr. 2015, 59, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lydon, G.P.; Caranovic, S.; Hischier, I.; Schlueter, A. Coupled simulation of thermally active building systems to support a digital twin. Energy Build. 2019, 202, 109298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.M.; Fatah El Mokadem, A.A.; Megahed, N.A.; Abo Eleinen, O.M. Improving outdoor air quality based on building morphology: Numerical investigation. Front. Archit. Res. 2020, 9, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.M.; ELMokadem, A.A.; Megahed, N.A.; Abo Eleinen, O.M. Urban morphology as a passive strategy in promoting outdoor air quality. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 29, 101204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.M.; Megahed, N.A. COVID-19 and urban spaces: A new integrated CFD approach for public health opportunities. Build. Environ. 2021, 204, 108131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elraouf, R.A.; ELMokadem, A.; Megahed, N.; Eleinen, O.A.; Eltarabily, S. Evaluating urban outdoor thermal comfort: A validation of ENVI-met simulation through field measurement. J. Build. Perform. Simul. 2022, 15, 268–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Zhang, L. A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimian, F.P.; Goulding, J.S.; Abrishami, S.; Seyedzadeh, S.; Elghaish, F. Industry 4.0 Solutions for Building Design and Construction: A Paradigm of New Opportunities; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Pierce, P.; Andersson, B. Challenges with smart cities initiatives–A municipal decision makers’ perspective. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2017; pp. 2804–2813. [Google Scholar]
- Darko, A.; Chan, A.P.C.; Adabre, M.A.; Edwards, D.J.; Hosseini, M.R.; Ameyaw, E.E. Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: Scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syafrudin, M.; Alfian, G.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Rhee, J. Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S.; Gajdzik, B. Industry 5.0: Improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics 2022, 127, 3117–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarfraz, Z.; Sarfraz, A.; Iftikar, H.M.; Akhund, R. Is COVID-19 pushing us to the fifth Industrial Revolution (Society 5.0)? Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 37, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, N.; Azarian, M.; Yu, H. Moving from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: What Are the Implications for Smart Logistics? Logistics 2022, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, S.; Chatterjee, A. Digital project driven supply chains: A new paradigm. Supply Chain. Manag. 2022, 27, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Haq, M.I.; Raina, A.; Suman, R. Industry 5.0: Potential applications in COVID-19. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 507–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, K.A.; Döven, G.; Sezen, B. Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 158, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paschek, D.; Luminosu, C.T.; Ocakci, E. Industry 5.0 Challenges and Perspectives for Manufacturing Systems in the Society 5.0. In Sustainability and Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 17–63. [Google Scholar]
- Awan, U.; Sroufe, R.; Shahbaz, M. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2038–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, F.; Ma, L.; Broyd, T.; Chen, K. Digital Twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Autom. Constr. 2021, 130, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering 2019, 5, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsharef, A.; Banerjee, S.; Uddin, S.J.; Albert, A.; Jaselskis, E. Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States construction industry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhao, L.; Ren, G.; Li, H.; Li, X. Special issue “Digital Twin technology in the AEC industry”. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 27, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Chen, D.; Lv, H. Smart city construction and management by digital twins and BIM big data in COVID-19 scenario. ACM Trans. Multimid. Comput. Commun. Appl. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
- Schluse, M.; Rossmann, J. From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, UK, 3–5 October 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Gabor, T.; Belzner, L.; Kiermeier, M.; Beck, M.T.; Neitz, A. A simulation-based architecture for smart cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE international conference on autonomic computing (ICAC), Wuerzburg, Germany, 17–22 July 2016; pp. 374–379. [Google Scholar]
- Canedo, A. Industrial IoT lifecycle via digital twins. In Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis, Pittsburgh PA, USA, 1–7 October 2016; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2016; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Bolton, R.N.; McColl-Kennedy, J.R.; Cheung, L.; Gallan, A.; Orsingher, C.; Witell, L.; Zaki, M. Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms. J. Serv. Manag. 2018, 29, 776–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borth, M.; Verriet, J.; Muller, G. Digital twin strategies for SoS 4 challenges and 4 architecture setups for DTs of SoS. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th annual conference system of systems engineering (SoSE), Anchorage, AK, USA, 19–22 May 2019; pp. 164–169. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Brilakis, I.; Pikas, E.; Xie, H.S.; Girolami, M. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Cent. Eng. 2020, 1, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Kevin, I.; Wang, K.; Huang, H.; Xu, X. Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 61, 101837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.; Menassa, C.C.; Kamat, V.R. From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 58–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khajavi, S.H.; Motlagh, N.H.; Jaribion, A.; Werner, L.C.; Holmström, J. Digital twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 147406–147419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S.; Akıner, İ.; Akıner, M.E. An adapted model of cognitive digital twins for building lifecycle management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, K.; Naji, K.; Gunduz, M.; Tokdemir, O.; Faqih, F.; Zayed, T. BIM-based facility management models for existing buildings. J. Eng. Res. 2022, 10, 1a. [Google Scholar]
- Megahed, N.A. Towards a theoretical framework for HBIM approach in historic preservation and management. ArchNet-IJAR. Int. J. Archit. Res. 2015, 9, 130. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, S.; Shelden, D.R.; Eastman, C.M.; Pishdad-Bozorgi, P.; Gao, X. A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: Present status and future trends. Autom. Constr. 2019, 101, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanlande, R.; Nicolle, C.; Cruz, C. IFC and building lifecycle management. Autom. Constr. 2008, 18, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammar, A.; Nassereddine, H.; Abdulbaky, N.; Aboukansour, A.; Tannoury, J.; Urban, H.; Schranz, C. Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Perspective of Practitioners and Building Authority. Front. Built Environ. 2022, 8, 834671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Hu, T.; Anwer, N.; Liu, A.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Sui, F.; Liu, A.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, B.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.C.; Nee, A.Y. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3935–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, R.; Borras, M.; Koppelaar, R.H.; Lodigiani, A.; Loscos, E.; Yöntem, E. SPHERE: BIM digital twin platform. Proceedings 2019, 20, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, J.; Saini, P.K.; Zhang, X. Machine learning and artificial intelligence for digital twin to accelerate sustainability in positive energy districts. In Data-driven Analytics for Sustainable Buildings and Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 411–422. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, B.; Lv, Z.; Wang, F. Digital Twins for Intelligent Green Buildings. Buildings 2022, 12, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motawa, I.; Almarshad, A. A knowledge-based BIM system for building maintenance. Autom. Constr. 2013, 29, 173–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, R.Y.; Peng, Y.; Xue, F.; Fang, J.; Zou, W.; Luo, H.; Ng, S.T.; Lu, W.; Shen, G.Q.; Huang, G.Q. Prefabricated construction enabled by the Internet-of-Things. Autom. Constr. 2017, 76, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Xiong, F.; Olawumi, T.O.; Dong, N.; Chan, A.P. Conceptual framework and roadmap approach for integrating BIM into lifecycle project management. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawkins, O.; Dennett, A.; Hudson-Smith, A.P. Living with a digital twin: Operational management and engagement using IoT and Mixed Realities at UCL’s Here East Campus on the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. In Giscience and Remote Sensing 2018; GIS Research UK (GISRUK); University of Leicester: Leicester, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi, N.; Vimal, A.; Taylor, J. Knowledge discovery in smart city digital twins. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2020; pp. 1656–1664. [Google Scholar]
- Rausch, C.; Sanchez, B.; Esfahani, M.E.; Haas, C. Computational algorithms for digital twin support in construction. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Computer Applications; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2020; pp. 191–200. [Google Scholar]
- Dawood, N.; Pour Rahimian, F.; Seyedzadeh, S.; Sheikhkhoshkar, M. Enabling the development and implementation of digital twins. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, Middlesbrough, UK, 30 September–2 October 2020; Tesside University Press: Middlesbrough, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Alshammari, K.; Beach, T.; Rezgui, Y. Cybersecurity for digital twins in the built environment: Current research and future directions. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, G.K.; Wang, X. Deep learning-based applications for safety management in the AEC industry: A review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.W.; Tang, T.L.; Spanos, C.J. Hybrid Approach for Digital Twins in the Built Environment. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, online, 22 June 2021; pp. 450–457. [Google Scholar]
- Sepasgozar, S.M. Differentiating digital twin from digital shadow: Elucidating a paradigm shift to expedite a smart, sustainable built environment. Buildings 2021, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, S. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2011, 11, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunz, J.; Fischer, M. Virtual design and construction. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2020, 38, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogunnusi, M.; Hamma-Adama, M.; Salman, H.; Kouider, T. COVID-19 pandemic: The effects and prospects in the construction industry. Int. J. Real Estate Stud. 2020, 14, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
- Ford, D.N.; Wolf, C.M. Smart cities with digital twin systems for disaster management. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04020027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Y.; Wu, X.; Luo, J. Data-model combined driven digital twin of life-cycle rolling bearing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 18, 1530–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Shafiq, M.T.; Douglas, D.; Kassem, M. Digital twins in built environments: An investigation of the characteristics, applications, and challenges. Buildings. 2022, 12, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Xie, L.; Lv, Z. BIM information integration based VR modeling in digital twins in industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 28, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L. Digital twins for the built environment: Learning from conceptual and process models in manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 49, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ref. | Definition |
---|---|
[52] | Virtual substitutes for real-world objects are composed of virtual representations and communication capabilities that comprise smart objects that serve as intelligent nodes within the IoT and services |
[53] | The simulation of the physical object that predicts the system’s future states |
[54] | A digital representation of a real-world object that focuses on the object itself |
[51] | A collection of virtual information constructs that completely describe a potential or actual physical manufactured product from the micro to the macro geometrical level |
[55] | A digital representation of assets, processes, or systems in the built or natural environment that is as accurate as possible |
[56] | A linked and synchronized digital replica of physical assets that represents both elements and dynamics |
[57] | A simulation-based planning and optimization concept with the potential to transform the AECO industry |
[58] | A new engineering model for construction production control that makes use of data streaming and the unique capabilities of multiple site-monitoring systems |
[13] | A combined approach based on big data and ML/AI for new forms of modeling and analysis |
Dimension | BIM | DTs Concept |
---|---|---|
Origin | Charles Eastman in the mid-1970s | Michael Grieves in 2003 |
Components | Virtual models typically built onsite. They contain both geometric and semantic information about the building elements. | Five parts: physical part, virtual part, connections, data, and services. It not only looks like the building model but also behaves just like the real building. |
Physical part | Optional - does not emphasize the existence of the physical counterpart - can denote something that does not exist or has not been constructed | Compulsory - emphasizes the existence of the physical counterpart - must promptly reflect the physical counterpart’s current state |
Virtual part | Compulsory | Compulsory |
Real time | It is not designed for real-time operational responses; however, BIM supports reactive measures. | It focuses on real-time data, giving an extensive picture of the building in real time, thereby supporting proactivity. |
Maturity continuum | Prescriptive | Descriptive |
Characteristic | Static model | Dynamic and responsive model |
Main focus | Buildings and tools (software) | People and their behavior patterns |
Main purpose | Collaboration and visualization during the design and construction phases | Operations and maintenance of the building, making it a live building |
Application focus | Interoperability of stakeholders, design visualization and consistency, clash detection, lean construction, time and cost estimation | Predictive maintenance, occupant comfort enhancement, resource consumption efficiency, what-if analysis, closed-loop design |
Main enabling technologies | Detailed 3D model, common data environment, industry foundation class, construction operations building information exchange | 3D model, WSN, data analytics, AI, ML, cloud and edge computing |
Tool/Software | Autodesk Revit, EnergyPlus, MicroStation, ArchiCAD, Open source BIMserver, Grevit | Predix, Dasher 360, Intelligent Communities Lifecycle, The Building Minds, Ecodomus |
Users | Architects, engineers, constructors, AEC, and facility managers | Architects, facility managers |
Ref. | Application |
---|---|
[74] | Develops an integrated system to capture information and knowledge of building maintenance operations during and after maintenance, to understand how a building deteriorates and to support preventive/corrective maintenance decisions. |
[64] | Develops a theoretical framework for the HBIM approach in historic preservation and management |
[75] | Transforms D BIM into nD BIM by incorporating IoT-enabled tools for prefabricated construction |
[76] | Investigates the role of big data in the physical, social, and cyberspaces of cities in order to build smart cities |
[77] | Conducts a practical investigation into the process of developing and collaborating with the new UCL Campus’s DTs |
[11] | Provides a comprehensive examination of the definitions and developments of DTs, as well as their applications in the AECO sector |
[78] | Based on city virtualization and DTs, provides predictive insights into a city’s smarter performance and growth |
[6] | Examines BIM’s many applications and limitations, as well as the importance of construction DTs in the construction industry |
[79] | Presents the application of a computational procedure to assist DTs in the construction process |
[80] | Develops and implements AECO’s DT, VR, AR, and BIM technologies |
[81] | Presents the topic of cybersecurity for DTs in the built environment |
[60] | Conducts research on the evolution of BIM to DTs in built environment applications |
[82] | Identifies relevant gaps, challenges, and future work on DL-based safety management applications in the AECO industry |
[83] | Presents a hybrid approach that combines physics-based and machine learning methods to create a DT for the existing built environment. |
[61] | Applies information from a practical investigation, in which more than 25,000 sensor reading instances were collected, analyzed, and used to create and test a limited digital twin of an office building facade element. |
[63] | Creates a framework for generating a BIM model for existing buildings, using a variety of data-capture techniques and then integrating the BIM model with a web-based building management system. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Megahed, N.A.; Hassan, A.M. Evolution of BIM to DTs: A Paradigm Shift for the Post-Pandemic AECO Industry. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040067
Megahed NA, Hassan AM. Evolution of BIM to DTs: A Paradigm Shift for the Post-Pandemic AECO Industry. Urban Science. 2022; 6(4):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040067
Chicago/Turabian StyleMegahed, Naglaa A., and Asmaa M. Hassan. 2022. "Evolution of BIM to DTs: A Paradigm Shift for the Post-Pandemic AECO Industry" Urban Science 6, no. 4: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040067
APA StyleMegahed, N. A., & Hassan, A. M. (2022). Evolution of BIM to DTs: A Paradigm Shift for the Post-Pandemic AECO Industry. Urban Science, 6(4), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040067