Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Photovoltaic Innovations
2.1. Evolution of PV Technologies
- First-generation PV cells: First-generation PV cells, predominantly based on crystalline silicon, marked the early stage of PV technology development. Crystalline silicon cells, either monocrystalline or polycrystalline, exhibited relatively high energy conversion efficiencies but involved expensive manufacturing processes and required thick silicon wafers [24]. These cells served as the foundation for the growth of the PV industry and set the stage for subsequent advancements. Crystalline silicon-based PV cells have been extensively studied and optimized over the years. According to a study by Saga et al. [25], the efficiency of commercial monocrystalline silicon cells has improved from around 10% in the early 1980s to over 25% in recent years. The study also highlighted advancements in manufacturing techniques, such as diamond-wire sawing, which have led to a reduction in material waste and lower manufacturing costs. Numerous researchers have undertaken efforts to enhance the efficiency of monocrystalline silicon cells. One such approach involves employing passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) technology. This technique entails passivating the rear surface of the solar cell to reduce the recombination of charge carriers and improve overall efficiency. This approach enhances light capture and helps achieve higher conversion efficiency [26,27]. Another avenue of advancement is the utilization of bifacial solar cells. These specialized cells can capture sunlight from both the front and rear sides, utilizing reflected and diffuse light from surrounding surfaces. This can lead to increased energy production and higher efficiencies [28]. Additionally, researchers like Uzu et al. [29] used multi-junction solar cells by stacking multiple layers of different semiconductor materials on top of each other. Each layer absorbed a different portion of the solar spectrum, increasing the overall efficiency of light absorption and energy conversion.
- Second-generation PV cells: The evolution of PV technologies led to the emergence of second-generation PV cells, primarily represented by thin-film technologies. Thin-film PV cells offer advantages such as lower material costs, flexibility, and the potential for large-scale production [30]. One notable thin-film technology is cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar cells. A study by Dharmadasa et al. [31] highlighted that CdTe thin-film solar cells have achieved high conversion efficiencies, reaching a record efficiency of 22.1%. The study emphasized the potential of CdTe technology in commercial-scale applications due to its low manufacturing costs and high performance under real-world conditions. Another significant second-generation thin-film technology is copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cells. A study by Nakamura et al. [32] demonstrated a record efficiency of 23.35% for CIGS thin-film solar cells. The study highlighted the potential of CIGS technology for high-efficiency, low-cost, and lightweight solar cells, making them suitable for various applications, including building-integrated photovoltaics.
- Third-generation PV cells: Third-generation PV cells encompass a range of emerging technologies that aim to further enhance the efficiency and capabilities of solar energy conversion. Perovskite solar cells have gained significant attention due to their potential for high efficiency and low-cost production. A study by Yoo et al. [33] reported a perovskite solar cell with a certified efficiency of 25.2%. The study highlighted the rapid advancements in perovskite solar cells and their potential for commercialization, although challenges such as stability and scalability still need to be addressed. Another emerging technology in third-generation PV cells is tandem solar cells. Tandem solar cells combine different semiconductor materials with complementary absorption properties to achieve higher conversion efficiencies. A study by Al-Ashouri et al. [34] demonstrated a record efficiency of 29.15% for a four-terminal perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell. The study emphasized the potential of tandem solar cells to exceed the efficiency limits of single-junction cells and pave the way for even more efficient PV systems. Organic solar cells are also third-generation PV cells; they are widely studied in academia and much effort has been invested to commercialize this technology. These cells are also known as organic photovoltaics (OPVs). OPVs utilize organic materials as the active semiconductor layer to convert sunlight into electricity. These cells offer flexibility and the potential for low-cost manufacturing [35]. Despite lower efficiencies compared with traditional silicon-based cells, recent advancements have pushed reported efficiencies beyond 18% [36]. An example of such progress is work by Cai et al. [37], which demonstrated a power conversion efficiency of 18.6% using two compatible non-fullerene acceptors. This showcases the growing potential of OPVs as a lightweight, flexible, and adaptable solar energy solution within the evolving PV landscape.
2.2. Key Advancements in PV Technologies
- Efficiency improvements: Efficiency improvements have been a focal point in the advancement of PV technologies, aiming to maximize the conversion of sunlight into electricity. Significant progress has been made in enhancing the efficiency of PV cells through various approaches. One notable advancement is the development of passivation techniques to minimize energy losses at the cell’s surface. For instance, the implementation of atomic layer deposition (ALD) for passivation layers has demonstrated notable improvements in the conversion efficiency of crystalline silicon solar cells [38]. A study by Hallam et al. [39] reported a significant enhancement in the performance of silicon solar cells through the application of ALD passivation layers, resulting in a 0.7% absolute efficiency gain. Additionally, the utilization of multi-junction solar cells has contributed to efficiency improvements. Multi-junction cells, composed of multiple semiconductor layers with different bandgaps, can capture a broader spectrum of sunlight and convert it into electricity [40]. A study by Geisg et al. [41] demonstrated a record efficiency of 47.1% for a four-junction solar cell, highlighting the potential of multi-junction designs in achieving higher conversion efficiencies.
- Cost reduction strategies: Reducing the cost of PV systems is crucial for their widespread adoption and competitiveness in the energy market. Various strategies have been employed to achieve cost reductions in PV technologies. One important advancement is the use of innovative manufacturing processes. For example, roll-to-roll (R2R) manufacturing techniques have been introduced for the production of thin-film PV cells. R2R processes enable high-volume, continuous production with reduced material waste and lower manufacturing costs [42]. A study by Peng et al. [43] highlighted the potential of R2R techniques for the large-scale production of organic solar cells, offering cost advantages and scalability. Furthermore, advancements in material choices have contributed to cost reductions. For instance, the development of non-toxic and abundant materials, such as perovskites, has shown promise for low-cost PV applications. Perovskite solar cells offer the advantage of solution processability, enabling efficient and cost-effective manufacturing. A study by Cao et al. [44] demonstrated a certified efficiency of 25.2% for perovskite solar cells using earth-abundant tin-based perovskite materials, highlighting their potential for low-cost PV technologies.
- Novel materials and manufacturing techniques: The exploration of novel materials and manufacturing techniques has been instrumental in advancing PV technologies and expanding their capabilities. One notable advancement in materials is the integration of nanomaterials into PV cells. Nanomaterials, such as quantum dots and nanowires, offer unique properties that can enhance light absorption and charge transport in PV devices [45]. A study by Maraghechi et al. [46] demonstrated the use of colloidal quantum dots to enhance the absorption range and efficiency of solar cells, highlighting the potential of nanomaterials for improving PV performance. Moreover, advancements in manufacturing techniques have contributed to the scalability and cost effectiveness of PV technologies. One such advancement is the development of printing technologies for PV cell fabrication. Printing techniques, such as screen printing and inkjet printing, enable high-throughput and low-cost production of PV devices. A study by Pendyala et al. [47] demonstrated the use of inkjet printing for fabricating perovskite solar cells, showing the potential for large-scale manufacturing with high precision and efficiency.
2.3. Service Life of PV Cells
3. Solar Thermal Systems
3.1. Types of Solar Thermal Systems
3.1.1. Solar Water Heaters
3.1.2. Solar Air Heaters
3.1.3. Solar Concentrators
3.2. Technological Advancements in Solar Thermal Systems
3.2.1. Enhanced Heat Transfer Techniques
3.2.2. Advanced Materials for Heat Absorption and Storage
3.2.3. Integration with Other Energy Systems (e.g., Combined Heat and Power)
4. Energy Storage Solutions for Solar Energy
4.1. Overview of Energy Storage Technologies
4.1.1. Battery-Based Storage Systems
4.1.2. Pumped Hydro Storage
4.1.3. Thermal Storage
4.1.4. Emerging Storage Technologies
4.2. Advances in Energy Storage for Solar Energy
4.2.1. Improvements in Battery Technologies for Solar Applications
4.2.2. Integration of Storage with PV and Solar Thermal Systems
4.2.3. Grid-Scale Energy Storage Solutions
4.3. Solar Energy Storage Market Trends
5. Synergies and Integration
5.1. Synergies between PV Technologies, Solar Thermal Systems, and Energy Storage
5.2. Combined Systems and Hybrid Approaches
5.3. Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Multiple Technologies
- Improved energy utilization: Integrating multiple technologies allows for better utilization of renewable energy resources. By combining PV, solar thermal technology, and energy storage systems, overall energy generation and utilization can be optimized, resulting in higher self-consumption rates and reduced dependence on the grid [142].
- Enhanced system performance: The integration of multiple technologies can lead to improved system performance. Synergistic interactions between different technologies enable more efficient use of energy, higher system efficiency, and better overall performance compared with standalone systems [143].
- Increased overall efficiency: Integrating multiple technologies can boost the overall efficiency of renewable energy systems. By combining PV, solar thermal technology, and energy storage, the system can achieve higher energy conversion rates, minimize energy losses, and maximize energy output, leading to better energy utilization and reduced waste [144].
- System complexity: Integrating multiple technologies introduces additional complexity to system design, installation, and operation. It requires careful planning, coordination, and integration of various components and control systems to ensure seamless operation and effective performance [145].
- Cost: Integrating multiple technologies can involve higher upfront costs compared with standalone systems. The costs associated with integration, including equipment, installation, and control systems, can pose financial challenges, although the long-term benefits and potential savings may outweigh the initial investment [146].
- Technology compatibility: Integrating different technologies often requires ensuring compatibility and efficient interaction between various components and systems. It may involve addressing technical challenges related to different voltage levels, control interfaces, and operational characteristics, which can present compatibility and interoperability issues [147].
6. Environmental Sustainability and Impact
6.1. Environmental Benefits of Solar Energy Technologies
6.2. Life-Cycle Analysis of Solar Energy Technologies
7. Barriers and Future Prospects
- Cost and economic viability:
- Continual reduction of costs: Ongoing research and development efforts aim to reduce the cost of PV systems, solar thermal systems, and energy storage technologies. This includes advancements in manufacturing processes, material selection, and system design.
- Government incentives and support: Governments can provide financial incentives, such as subsidies, tax credits, and grants, to promote the adoption of solar energy technologies and energy storage solutions [157]. These incentives help offset the upfront costs and improve the economic viability of these technologies.
- 2.
- Intermittency and grid integration:
- Energy storage integration: Energy storage solutions, such as batteries and pumped hydro storage, can address the intermittency challenge by storing excess energy during periods of high generation and releasing it during low generation periods [159]. A study conducted by Syed et al. [160] highlighted the role of BESS in smoothing out fluctuations in solar generation. BESS can store excess solar energy and release it during periods of reduced generation, thereby providing grid support and maintaining grid frequency stability. Yao et al. [161] proposed an integrated energy management framework that combines distributed energy resources, demand response, and energy storage to enhance grid resilience and stability.
- Grid flexibility and management: Advanced grid management systems, including smart grids and demand response mechanisms, can help balance the intermittent nature of solar energy generation and ensure stable grid operation [162]. Research by Zhou et al. [163] demonstrated that advanced control strategies for solar thermal systems, integrated with energy storage, contribute to grid flexibility. By optimizing energy dispatch based on real-time grid conditions, solar thermal systems with storage can respond to grid demands efficiently. The work of Kanchev et al. [164] highlighted the use of smart grid communication and control systems in managing distributed PV generation. Real-time monitoring and control enable grid operators to balance supply and demand, mitigating the impact of intermittent solar outputs.
- 3.
- Environmental impacts and sustainability:
- Sustainable material sourcing: Implementing responsible sourcing practices and using environmentally friendly materials can minimize the environmental footprint of PV technologies, solar thermal systems, and energy storage solutions [166].
- End-of-life management: Proper recycling and disposal of PV modules, solar thermal components, and energy storage devices can reduce waste generation and recover valuable materials for reuse [167].
- 4.
- Grid infrastructure and technical challenges:
- Grid expansion and modernization: Governments and energy stakeholders need to invest in grid infrastructure upgrades, including the installation of smart grid technologies and grid-scale storage systems, to accommodate the increased integration of solar energy technologies [169].
- Workforce training and education: Developing skilled professionals and providing training programs for the installation, operation, and maintenance of solar energy systems is essential to overcome technical challenges [170].
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kannan, N.; Vakeesan, D. Solar energy for future world—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 1092–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahsavari, A.; Akbari, M. Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, E. Energy Sources on Earth. In The Sun, Energy, and Climate Change; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 69–122. [Google Scholar]
- Granovskii, M.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. Greenhouse gas emissions reduction by use of wind and solar energies for hydrogen and electricity production: Economic factors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, N.; Sami, I.; Jamal Babqi, A.; Alkhammash, H.I.; Belkhier, Y.; Althobaiti, A.; Ibeas, A. Processor in the Loop Verification of Fault Tolerant Control for a Three Phase Inverter in Grid Connected PV System. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2023, 45, 3760–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dashtdar, M.; Sarada, K.; Hosseinimoghadam, S.M.S.; Kalyan, C.H.N.S.; Venkateswarlu, A.N.; Goud, B.S.; Reddy, C.H.R.; Belkhier, Y.; Bajaj, M.; Reddy, B.N. Faulted Section Identification and Fault Location in Power Network Based on Histogram Analysis of Three-phase Current and Voltage Modulated. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2022, 17, 2631–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elumalai, N.K.; Mahmud, M.A.; Wang, D.; Uddin, A. Perovskite Solar Cells: Progress and Advancements. Energies 2016, 9, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, L.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahim, N.A. Global advancement of solar thermal energy technologies for industrial process heat and its future prospects: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 195, 885–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atawi, I.E.; Al-Shetwi, A.Q.; Magableh, A.M.; Albalawi, O.H. Recent Advances in Hybrid Energy Storage System Integrated Renewable Power Generation: Configuration, Control, Applications, and Future Directions. Batteries 2023, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.; Yadav, R. Future of photovoltaic technologies: A comprehensive review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Callejo, L.; Gallardo-Saavedra, S.; Alonso-Gómez, V. A review of photovoltaic systems: Design, operation and maintenance. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 426–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, A.; Ahmed, N.; Qureshi, S.A.; Assadi, M.; Ahmed, N. Advances in Solar PV Systems; A Comprehensive Review of PV Performance, Influencing Factors, and Mitigation Techniques. Energies 2022, 15, 7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rynska, E. Review of PV Solar Energy Development 2011–2021 in Central European Countries. Energies 2022, 15, 8307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, M.I.; Yunus, N.A.; Hashim, H. Integration of solar heating systems for low-temperature heat demand in food processing industry—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 147, 111192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, G.; Ning, X.; Hussain, M.; Sajjad, U.; Sultan, M.; Ali, H.M.; Shah, T.R.; Ahmad, H. Potential evaluation of hybrid nanofluids for solar thermal energy harvesting: A review of recent advances. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 48, 101651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal Ahmed, S.; Khalid, M.; Vaka, M.; Walvekar, R.; Numan, A.; Khaliq Rasheed, A.; Mujawar Mubarak, N. Recent progress in solar water heaters and solar collectors: A comprehensive review. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 25, 100981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naveenkumar, R.; Ravichandran, M.; Mohanavel, V.; Karthick, A.; Aswin, L.S.R.L.; Priyanka, S.S.H.; Kumar, S.K.; Kumar, S.P. Review on phase change materials for solar energy storage applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 9491–9532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takshi, A.; Aljafari, B.; Kareri, T.; Stefanakos, E. A Critical Review on the Voltage Requirement in Hybrid Cells with Solar Energy Harvesting and Energy Storage Capability. Batter. Supercaps 2021, 4, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koçak, B.; Fernandez, A.I.; Paksoy, H. Review on sensible thermal energy storage for industrial solar applications and sustainability aspects. Sol. Energy 2020, 209, 135–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhuyi Nazari, M.; Maleki, A.; Assad, M.E.H.; Rosen, M.A.; Haghighi, A.; Sharabaty, H.; Chen, L. A review of nanomaterial incorporated phase change materials for solar thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy 2021, 228, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haidar, A.M.A.; John, P.N.; Shawal, M. Optimal configuration assessment of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gevorkian, P. Sustainable Energy Systems Engineering: The Complete Green Building Design Resource, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio, P.G.V.; González, M.O.A. Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goetzberger, A.; Hebling, C.; Schock, H.-W. Photovoltaic materials, history, status and outlook. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2003, 40, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saga, T. Advances in crystalline silicon solar cell technology for industrial mass production. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 2, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Li, G.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Zheng, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, D.; Lu, L. Numerical study of mono-crystalline silicon solar cells with passivated emitter and rear contact configuration for the efficiency beyond 24% based on mass production technology. J. Semicond. 2020, 41, 062701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Wang, E.; Wang, H.; Guo, W. Industrail Technology of Passivated Emitter and Rear Cells with Silicon Oxynitride and Silicon Nitride as Rear Passivation for High Efficiency BIPV Modules. Energy Procedia 2016, 88, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vimala, M.; Ramadas, G.; Perarasi, M.; Manokar, A.M.; Sathyamurthy, R. A Review of Different Types of Solar Cell Materials Employed in Bifacial Solar Photovoltaic Panel. Energies 2023, 16, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uzu, H.; Ichikawa, M.; Hino, M.; Nakano, K.; Meguro, T.; Hernández, J.L.; Kim, H.-S.; Park, N.-G.; Yamamoto, K. High efficiency solar cells combining a perovskite and a silicon heterojunction solar cells via an optical splitting system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinhard, P.; Chirilă, A.; Blösch, P.; Pianezzi, F.; Nishiwaki, S.; Buechelers, S.; Tiwari, A.N. Review of progress toward 20% efficiency flexible CIGS solar cells and manufacturing issues of solar modules. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) PART 2, Austin, TX, USA, 3–8 June 2012; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Dharmadasa, I.M.; Alam, A.E. How to Achieve Efficiencies beyond 22.1% for CdTe-Based Thin-Film Solar Cells. Energies 2022, 15, 9510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kimoto, Y.; Yasaki, Y.; Kato, T.; Sugimoto, H. Cd-Free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 Thin-Film Solar Cell With Record Efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019, 9, 1863–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.J.; Seo, G.; Chua, M.R.; Park, T.G.; Lu, Y.; Rotermund, F.; Kim, Y.-K.; Moon, C.S.; Jeon, N.J.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; et al. Efficient perovskite solar cells via improved carrier management. Nature 2021, 590, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ashouri, A.; Köhnen, E.; Li, B.; Magomedov, A.; Hempel, H.; Caprioglio, P.; Márquez, J.A.; Morales Vilches, A.B.; Kasparavicius, E.; Smith, J.A.; et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with >29% efficiency by enhanced hole extraction. Science 2020, 370, 1300–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, L.; Li, S.; Lau, T.-K.; Cui, Y.; Lu, X.; Shi, M.; Li, C.-Z.; Li, H.; Hou, J.; Chen, H. Over 17% efficiency ternary organic solar cells enabled by two non-fullerene acceptors working in an alloy-like model. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 635–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.A. Emerging Chemistry in Enhancing the Chemical and Photochemical Stabilities of Fused-Ring Electron Acceptors in Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Wu, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Z.; Hao, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. A Well-Mixed Phase Formed by Two Compatible Non-Fullerene Acceptors Enables Ternary Organic Solar Cells with Efficiency over 18.6%. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2101733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, X.; Xu, H.; Liu, W.; Bi, Q.; Xu, L.; Kang, J.; Hedhili, M.N.; Sun, B.; Zhang, X.; De Wolf, S. Atomic Layer Deposition of Vanadium Oxide as Hole-Selective Contact for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 2000467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallam, B.; Sugianto, A.; Mai, L.; Xu, G.; Chan, C.; Abbott, M.; Wenham, S.; Uruena, A.; Cornagliotti, E.; Aleman, M. Hydrogen Passivation of Laser-Induced Defects for Laser-Doped Silicon Solar Cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2014, 4, 1413–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamaguchi, M.; Dimroth, F.; Geisz, J.F.; Ekins-Daukes, N.J. Multi-junction solar cells paving the way for super high-efficiency. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisz, J.F.; France, R.M.; Schulte, K.L.; Steiner, M.A.; Norman, A.G.; Guthrey, H.L.; Young, M.R.; Song, T.; Moriarty, T. Six-junction III–V solar cells with 47.1% conversion efficiency under 143 Suns concentration. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, N.L.; Ho-Baillie, A.W.Y.; Vak, D.; Gao, M.; Green, M.A.; Egan, R.J. Manufacturing cost and market potential analysis of demonstrated roll-to-roll perovskite photovoltaic cell processes. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 174, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Yuan, J.; Shen, S.; Gao, M.; Chesman, A.S.R.; Yin, H.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Angmo, D. Perovskite and Organic Solar Cells Fabricated by Inkjet Printing: Progress and Prospects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1703704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Gu, A.; Yu, H.; Ban, H.; Sun, Q.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhu, J.; et al. The effect of defects in tin-based perovskites and their photovoltaic devices. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 21, 100513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, C.; Nie, B.; Zeng, L.; Liang, F.-X.; Wang, M.-Z.; Luo, L.; Feng, M.; Yu, Y.; Wu, C.-Y.; Wu, Y.; et al. Core–Shell Heterojunction of Silicon Nanowire Arrays and Carbon Quantum Dots for Photovoltaic Devices and Self-Driven Photodetectors. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4015–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maraghechi, P.; Labelle, A.J.; Kirmani, A.R.; Lan, X.; Adachi, M.M.; Thon, S.M.; Hoogland, S.; Lee, A.; Ning, Z.; Fischer, A.; et al. The Donor–Supply Electrode Enhances Performance in Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6111–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pendyala, N.K.; Magdassi, S.; Etgar, L. Fabrication of Perovskite Solar Cells with Digital Control of Transparency by Inkjet Printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 30524–30532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, Z.A.; Singh, T.J.; Islam, S.M.; Singh, S.; Mahala, P.; Khan, A.; Singh, K.J. Photovoltaic solar cells based on graphene/gallium arsenide Schottky junction. Optik 2019, 182, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Islam, A.; Chen, H.; Malapaka, C.; Chiranjeevi, B.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Yanagida, M. High-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell with a novel co-adsorbent. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6057–6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, X.; Zhang, F.; Song, T.; Sun, B. An 11%-Power-Conversion-Efficiency Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Solar Cell Achieved by Facile Organic Passivation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 345–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zielke, D.; Pazidis, A.; Werner, F.; Schmidt, J. Organic-silicon heterojunction solar cells on n-type silicon wafers: The BackPEDOT concept. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 131, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, R.; Bhattarai, S.; Sharma, K.; Madan, J.; Al-Mousoi, A.K.; Mohammed, M.K.A.; Hossain, M.K. Halide Composition Engineered a Non-Toxic Perovskite–Silicon Tandem Solar Cell with 30.7% Conversion Efficiency. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, R.; Khanna, A.; Singh, K.; Patel, S.K.; Singh, H.; Madan, J. Device simulations: Toward the design of >13% efficient PbS colloidal quantum dot solar cell. Sol. Energy 2020, 207, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahli, F.; Werner, J.; Kamino, B.A.; Bräuninger, M.; Monnard, R.; Paviet-Salomon, B.; Barraud, L.; Ding, L.; Diaz Leon, J.J.; Sacchetto, D.; et al. Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, Q.; Jia, Z.; Meng, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Yuan, J.; Gao, F.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Promoting charge separation resulting in ternary organic solar cells efficiency over 17.5%. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt-Mende, L.; Bach, U.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Horiuchi, T.; Miura, H.; Ito, S.; Uchida, S.; Grätzel, M. Organic Dye for Highly Efficient Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 813–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrillo, J.; Guerrero, A.; Rahimnejad, S.; Almora, O.; Zarazua, I.; Mas-Marza, E.; Bisquert, J.; Garcia-Belmonte, G. Ionic Reactivity at Contacts and Aging of Methylammonium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Descoeudres, A.; Holman, Z.C.; Barraud, L.; Morel, S.; Wolf, S.D.; Ballif, C. >21% Efficient Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells on n- and p-Type Wafers Compared. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2013, 3, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philipps, S.P.; Guter, W.; Welser, E.; Schöne, J.; Steiner, M.; Dimroth, F.; Bett, A.W. Present Status in the Development of III–V Multi-Junction Solar Cells. In Next Generation of Photovoltaics: New Concepts; Cristóbal López, A.B., Martí Vega, A., Luque López, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Sung, H.; Ahn, N.; Jang, M.S.; Lee, J.-K.; Yoon, H.; Park, N.-G.; Choi, M. Transparent Conductive Oxide-Free Graphene-Based Perovskite Solar Cells with over 17% Efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barraud, L.; Holman, Z.C.; Badel, N.; Reiss, P.; Descoeudres, A.; Battaglia, C.; De Wolf, S.; Ballif, C. Hydrogen-doped indium oxide/indium tin oxide bilayers for high-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 115, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bdour, M.; Dalala, Z.; Al-Addous, M.; Radaideh, A.; Al-Sadi, A. A Comprehensive Evaluation on Types of Microcracks and Possible Effects on Power Degradation in Photovoltaic Solar Panels. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikh, A.D.; Munir, R.; Haque, M.A.; Bera, A.; Hu, W.; Shaikh, P.; Amassian, A.; Wu, T. Effects of High Temperature and Thermal Cycling on the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells: Acceleration of Charge Recombination and Deterioration of Charge Extraction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35018–35029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazem, H.A.; Chaichan, M.T. Effect of humidity on photovoltaic performance based on experimental study. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. (IJAER) 2015, 10, 43572–43577. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, D.C.; Kurtz, S.R. Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—An Analytical Review. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2013, 21, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Koh, S.C.L.; Reaney, I.M.; Acquaye, A.; Schileo, G.; Mustapha, K.B.; Greenough, R. Perovskite solar cells: An integrated hybrid lifecycle assessment and review in comparison with other photovoltaic technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1321–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weerasinghe, H.C.; Dkhissi, Y.; Scully, A.D.; Caruso, R.A.; Cheng, Y.-B. Encapsulation for improving the lifetime of flexible perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2015, 18, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.; Chandel, S.S. Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omazic, A.; Oreski, G.; Halwachs, M.; Eder, G.C.; Hirschl, C.; Neumaier, L.; Pinter, G.; Erceg, M. Relation between degradation of polymeric components in crystalline silicon PV module and climatic conditions: A literature review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 192, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herzog, H.; Eliasson, B.; Kaarstad, O. Capturing Greenhouse Gases. Sci. Am. 2000, 282, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravi Kumar, K.; Krishna Chaitanya, N.V.V.; Sendhil Kumar, N. Solar thermal energy technologies and its applications for process heating and power generation—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 125296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamar, A.; Majid, Z.A.A.; Azmi, W.H.; Norhafana, M.; Razak, A.A. A review of water heating system for solar energy applications. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 76, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazarrón, F.R.; Porras-Prieto, C.J.; García, J.L.; Benavente, R.M. Feasibility of active solar water heating systems with evacuated tube collector at different operational water temperatures. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 113, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozsoy, A.; Demirer, S.; Adam, N.M. An experimental study on double-glazed flat plate solar water heating system in Turkey. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 564, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsheniti, M.B.; Kotb, A.; Elsamni, O. Thermal performance of a heat-pipe evacuated-tube solar collector at high inlet temperatures. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 154, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, W.; Hong, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Ji, J. Operational performance of a novel heat pump assisted solar façade loop-heat-pipe water heating system. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Chand, P. Performance enhancement of solar air heater using herringbone corrugated fins. Energy 2017, 127, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sebaii, A.A.; Aboul-Enein, S.; Ramadan, M.R.I.; Shalaby, S.M.; Moharram, B.M. Thermal performance investigation of double pass-finned plate solar air heater. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 1727–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnananth, S.S.; Kalidasa Murugavel, K. Experimental study on double pass solar air heater with thermal energy storage. J. King Saud Univ.—Eng. Sci. 2013, 25, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, S. Design and performance analysis of compressed CO2 energy storage of a solar power tower generation system based on the S-CO2 Brayton cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 249, 114856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siva Reddy, V.; Kaushik, S.C.; Ranjan, K.R.; Tyagi, S.K. State-of-the-art of solar thermal power plants—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Kumar, K.R. Techno economic feasibility study on hydrogen production using concentrating solar thermal technology in India. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 37708–37723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, D.T.; Nghiem, V.T.; Tien, T.Q.; Hieu, N.M.; Minh, K.N.; Vu, H.; Shin, S.; Vu, N.H. Optimizing optical fiber daylighting system for indoor agriculture applications. Sol. Energy 2022, 247, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, T.T.; Vu, N.H.; Shin, S. Novel Design of Primary Optical Elements Based on a Linear Fresnel Lens for Concentrator Photovoltaic Technology. Energies 2019, 12, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.; Zheng, H.; Ma, X.; Kutlu, C.; Su, Y. Experimental investigation of a multi-stage humidification-dehumidification desalination system heated directly by a cylindrical Fresnel lens solar concentrator. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 143, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, H.; Dai, Y.J.; Wu, J.Y.; Wang, R.Z.; Zhang, L.Y. Experimental investigation and analysis on a concentrating solar collector using linear Fresnel lens. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Li, X.; Luo, B. The enhanced heat transfer of diathermic oil-based alumina-doped zinc oxide nanofluids for domestic solar heating systems. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 3977–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pu, L.; Liu, R.; Huang, H.; Zhang, S.; Qi, Z.; Xu, W.; Zhou, J. Experimental study of cyclic frosting and defrosting on microchannel heat exchangers with different coatings. Energy Build. 2020, 226, 110382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basbous, N.; Taqi, M.; Janan, M.A. Thermal performances analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector using different nanofluids. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), Marrakech, Morocco, 14–17 November 2016; pp. 322–326. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, D.H.; Ahn, H.S. A comprehensive review on micro/nanoscale surface modification techniques for heat transfer enhancement in heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2021, 178, 121601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvakumar, N.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Barshilia, H.C. Carbon Nanotube-Based Tandem Absorber with Tunable Spectral Selectivity: Transition from Near-Perfect Blackbody Absorber to Solar Selective Absorber. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2552–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsanusi, O.S.; Nsofor, E.C. Melting of multiple PCMs with different arrangements inside a heat exchanger for energy storage. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2021, 185, 116046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazman, M.; Cabeza, L.F.; Mehling, H.; Nogues, M.; Evliya, H.; Paksoy, H.Ö. Utilization of phase change materials in solar domestic hot water systems. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 1639–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Xie, M.; Ai, Q.; Yu, Z. Ultra-broadband selective absorber for near-perfect harvesting of solar energy. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2021, 266, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razmi, A.R.; Heydari Afshar, H.; Pourahmadiyan, A.; Torabi, M. Investigation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system based on biomass and compressed air energy storage (CAES). Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 46, 101253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Xue, K.; Wu, Y.; Xu, G.; Jin, X.; Liu, W. Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a solar-aided biomass-fired combined heat and power system. Energy 2021, 214, 119023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbin, C.D.; Zhai, Z.J. Experimental and numerical investigation on thermal and electrical performance of a building integrated photovoltaic–thermal collector system. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Zhao, X.; Ma, X.; Du, Z.; Fan, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, X. Clear-days operational performance of a hybrid experimental space heating system employing the novel mini-channel solar thermal & PV/T panels and a heat pump. Sol. Energy 2017, 155, 464–477. [Google Scholar]
- IRENA. Electricity Storage and Renewables: Costs and Markets to 2030, Report. Int. Renew. Energy Agency Abu Dhabi 2017, 164, 1–132. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, S.; Lee, H.; Yu, Y.-S.; Park, J.; Kim, C. Development of a Rock-Salt Structure for High Energy Density Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2023, 19, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, F.M.; Moura, P.S.; de Almeida, A.T. Energy storage system for self-consumption of photovoltaic energy in residential zero energy buildings. Renew. Energy 2017, 103, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, M.B.; Bruce, A.; MacGill, I. Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings. Appl. Energy 2019, 245, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Abbas, M.K.; Tabar, V.S.; Tohidi, S.; Sameen, A.Z.; Salman, H.M. Techno-economic assessment of battery storage with photovoltaics for maximum self-consumption. Energy Harvest. Syst. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekioua, D. Energy Storage Systems for Photovoltaic and Wind Systems: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beevers, D.; Branchini, L.; Orlandini, V.; De Pascale, A.; Perez-Blanco, H. Pumped hydro storage plants with improved operational flexibility using constant speed Francis runners. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, P.; Rizwan, M. Energy management supporting high penetration of solar photovoltaic generation for smart grid using solar forecasts and pumped hydro storage system. Renew. Energy 2018, 118, 928–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gioutsos, D.M.; Blok, K.; van Velzen, L.; Moorman, S. Cost-optimal electricity systems with increasing renewable energy penetration for islands across the globe. Appl. Energy 2018, 226, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boretti, A.; Castelletto, S. High-temperature molten-salt thermal energy storage and advanced-Ultra-supercritical power cycles. J. Energy Storage 2021, 42, 103143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Praveen, R.P.; Chandra Mouli, K.V.V. Performance enhancement of parabolic trough collector solar thermal power plants with thermal energy storage capability. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Yang, J.; Yang, Z.; Duan, Y. Techno-economic feasibility of solar power plants considering PV/CSP with electrical/thermal energy storage system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramendia, I.; Fernandez-Gamiz, U.; Martinez-San-Vicente, A.; Zulueta, E.; Lopez-Guede, J.M. Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: A Review Oriented to Fluid-Dynamic Optimization. Energies 2021, 14, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otto, M.; Chagoya, K.L.; Blair, R.G.; Hick, S.M.; Kapat, J.S. Optimal hydrogen carrier: Holistic evaluation of hydrogen storage and transportation concepts for power generation, aviation, and transportation. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.A.; Copp, D.A.; Byrne, R.H.; Chalamala, B.R. Market Evaluation of Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Technology-Specific Nonlinear Models. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 3706–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monforti Ferrario, A.; Bartolini, A.; Segura Manzano, F.; Vivas, F.J.; Comodi, G.; McPhail, S.J.; Andujar, J.M. A model-based parametric and optimal sizing of a battery/hydrogen storage of a real hybrid microgrid supplying a residential load: Towards island operation. Adv. Appl. Energy 2021, 3, 100048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elberry, A.M.; Thakur, J.; Veysey, J. Seasonal hydrogen storage for sustainable renewable energy integration in the electricity sector: A case study of Finland. J. Energy Storage 2021, 44, 103474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Zheng, J.; Song, J.; Luo, L.; Yi, R.; Estevez, L.; Zhao, W.; Patel, R.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.-G. A novel approach to synthesize micrometer-sized porous silicon as a high performance anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2018, 50, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wessells, C.D.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. Copper hexacyanoferrate battery electrodes with long cycle life and high power. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, S.; Li, Z.; Rodríguez-Pérez, I.A.; Jiang, H.; Lu, J.; Zhang, X.; Ji, X. A novel coronene//Na2Ti3O7 dual-ion battery. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basile, A.; Hilder, M.; Makhlooghiazad, F.; Pozo-Gonzalo, C.; MacFarlane, D.R.; Howlett, P.C.; Forsyth, M. Ionic Liquids and Organic Ionic Plastic Crystals: Advanced Electrolytes for Safer High Performance Sodium Energy Storage Technologies. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Wu, Y.; Duan, J.; Zhan, R.; Wang, W.; Wang, M.-Q.; Chen, Y.; Xu, M.; Bao, S.-J. (001) Facet-Dominated Hierarchically Hollow Na2Ti3O7 as a High-Rate Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Capacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42197–42205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, T.; Hu, P.; Cai, C.; Liu, Z.; Hu, G.; Kuang, Q.; Mai, L.; Zhou, L. Dual carbon decorated Na3MnTi(PO4)3: A high-energy-density cathode material for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2020, 70, 104548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, C.; Xu, R.; Wu, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, J.; Amine, K. Hard Carbon Originated from Polyvinyl Chloride Nanofibers As High-Performance Anode Material for Na-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5598–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jaszczur, M.; Hassan, Q. An optimisation and sizing of photovoltaic system with supercapacitor for improving self-consumption. Appl. Energy 2020, 279, 115776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appen, J.V.; Stetz, T.; Braun, M.; Schmiegel, A. Local Voltage Control Strategies for PV Storage Systems in Distribution Grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boukelia, T.E.; Mecibah, M.S.; Kumar, B.N.; Reddy, K.S. Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt. Energy 2015, 88, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Blakers, A.; Stocks, M.; Do, T.N. Low-cost, low-emission 100% renewable electricity in Southeast Asia supported by pumped hydro storage. Energy 2021, 236, 121387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatzigeorgiou, N.; Afxentis, S.; Panagiotou, K.; Georghiou, G.E. Analysis of ‘Increase Self-Consumption’ Battery Energy Storage System Use—A Residential Case Study in Cyprus. In Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Energy Transition in the Mediterranean Area (SyNERGY MED), Cagliari, Italy, 28–30 May 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, S.C.; Papageorgiou, D.J.; Harper, M.R.; Rhodes, J.D.; Hanson, K.; Webber, M.E. The economic and reliability impacts of grid-scale storage in a high penetration renewable energy system. Adv. Appl. Energy 2021, 3, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthews, T.; Hirve, M.; Pan, Y.; Dang, D.; Rawar, E.; Daim, T.U. Tesla Energy. In Innovation Management in the Intelligent World: Cases and Tools; Daim, T.U., Meissner, D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 233–249. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkar, E.M.; Sarkar, T.; Bharadwaj, M.D. Lithium-ion battery supply chain: Enabling national electric vehicle and renewables targets. Curr. Sci. 2018, 114, 2453–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Chen, X.; Qiu, R.; Hou, S. Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridge, G.; Faigen, E. Towards the lithium-ion battery production network: Thinking beyond mineral supply chains. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 89, 102659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, M.Y.; Hamid, S.A.; Tabook, M.A.S.; Sopian, K.; Roslan, M.H.; Ibarahim, Z. Performance analysis of PV/T Combi with water and air heating system: An experimental study. Renew. Energy 2016, 86, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astolfi, M.; Mazzola, S.; Silva, P.; Macchi, E. A synergic integration of desalination and solar energy systems in stand-alone microgrids. Desalination 2017, 419, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tercan, S.M.; Demirci, A.; Gokalp, E.; Cali, U. Maximizing self-consumption rates and power quality towards two-stage evaluation for solar energy and shared energy storage empowered microgrids. J. Energy Storage 2022, 51, 104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fachrizal, R.; Shepero, M.; Åberg, M.; Munkhammar, J. Optimal PV-EV sizing at solar powered workplace charging stations with smart charging schemes considering self-consumption and self-sufficiency balance. Appl. Energy 2022, 307, 118139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, A.; Rosen, M.A.; Pourfayaz, F. Optimal Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Residential Applications. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zurita, A.; Mata-Torres, C.; Valenzuela, C.; Felbol, C.; Cardemil, J.M.; Guzmán, A.M.; Escobar, R.A. Techno-economic evaluation of a hybrid CSP + PV plant integrated with thermal energy storage and a large-scale battery energy storage system for base generation. Sol. Energy 2018, 173, 1262–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Xu, C.; Ju, X.; Du, X.; Yang, Y. Energy analysis of a hybrid solar concentrating photovoltaic/concentrating solar power (CPV/CSP) system. Sci. Bull. 2015, 60, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Liu, L.; Yin, G.; Wang, J.; Yan, J. Optimal design and operation of hybrid renewable energy system for drinking water treatment. Energy 2021, 219, 119673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, F.; Yuan, M.; Lewis, N.S.; Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K. Effects of deep reductions in energy storage costs on highly reliable wind and solar electricity systems. Iscience 2020, 23, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshövel, J.; Kairies, K.-P.; Magnor, D.; Leuthold, M.; Bost, M.; Gährs, S.; Szczechowicz, E.; Cramer, M.; Sauer, D.U. Analysis of the maximal possible grid relief from PV-peak-power impacts by using storage systems for increased self-consumption. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterseim, J.H.; White, S.; Tadros, A.; Hellwig, U. Concentrating solar power hybrid plants—Enabling cost effective synergies. Renew. Energy 2014, 67, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adefarati, T.; Bansal, R.C. Integration of renewable distributed generators into the distribution system: A review. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2016, 10, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Noaimi, F.; Khir, R.; Haouari, M. Optimal design of a district cooling grid: Structure, technology integration, and operation. Eng. Optim. 2019, 51, 160–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, A.; Saini, R.P. A review on Integrated Renewable Energy System based power generation for stand-alone applications: Configurations, storage options, sizing methodologies and control. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Kim, K.N.; Trifonov, A.; Podhajny, T.; Wang, J. Designing wearable microgrids: Towards autonomous sustainable on-body energy management. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 82–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Kent Hoekman, S.; Robbins, C.; Ross, P. Lifecycle climate impacts and economic performance of commercial-scale solar PV systems: A study of PV systems at Nevada’s Desert Research Institute (DRI). Sol. Energy 2015, 119, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Dong, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, R. The Relationship between the Low-Carbon Industrial Model and Human Well-Being: A Case Study of the Electric Power Industry. Energies 2023, 16, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granovskii, M.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. Air pollution reduction via use of green energy sources for electricity and hydrogen production. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 1777–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertwich, E.G.; Gibon, T.; Bouman, E.A.; Arvesen, A.; Suh, S.; Heath, G.A.; Bergesen, J.D.; Ramirez, A.; Vega, M.I.; Shi, L. Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 6277–6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suresh, M.V.J.J.; Reddy, K.S.; Kolar, A.K. 4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment, and Economic) analysis of solar thermal aided coal-fired power plants. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2010, 14, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, I.; Song, Z.; Cimaroli, A.J.; Yan, Y.; Heben, M.J.; Apul, D. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of perovskite PV cells projected from lab to fab. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 156, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmud, M.A.P.; Huda, N.; Farjana, S.H.; Lang, C. Environmental Impacts of Solar-Photovoltaic and Solar-Thermal Systems with Life-Cycle Assessment. Energies 2018, 11, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yudhistira, R.; Khatiwada, D.; Sanchez, F. A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 358, 131999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tongsopit, S.; Moungchareon, S.; Aksornkij, A.; Potisat, T. Business models and financing options for a rapid scale-up of rooftop solar power systems in Thailand. Energy Policy 2016, 95, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, L.; Carriveau, R. A review of energy storage financing—Learning from and partnering with the renewable energy industry. J. Energy Storage 2018, 19, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, K.M.; Rashid, K.; Ellingwood, K.; Tuttle, J.; Iverson, B.D. Hybrid concentrated solar thermal power systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Suharto, Y.; Daim, T.U. Evaluation of Electrical Energy Storage (EES) technologies for renewable energy: A case from the US Pacific Northwest. J. Energy Storage 2017, 11, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syed, M.A.; Khalid, M. Machine Learning Based Controlled Filtering for Solar PV Variability Reduction with BESS. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation (SEFET), Hyderabad, India, 21–23 January 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, Y.; Liu, W.; Jain, R.; Chowdhury, B.; Wang, J.; Cox, R. Quantitative Metrics for Grid Resilience Evaluation and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2023, 14, 1244–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Tang, R. Development of grid-responsive buildings: Opportunities, challenges, capabilities and applications of HVAC systems in non-residential buildings in providing ancillary services by fast demand responses to smart grids. Appl. Energy 2019, 250, 697–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Cao, S. Energy flexibility investigation of advanced grid-responsive energy control strategies with the static battery and electric vehicles: A case study of a high-rise office building in Hong Kong. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 199, 111888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanchev, H.; Lu, D.; Colas, F.; Lazarov, V.; Francois, B. Energy Management and Operational Planning of a Microgrid With a PV-Based Active Generator for Smart Grid Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 4583–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoutsos, T.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Gekas, V. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, T.; Farhat, A.; Diabat, A.; Kennedy, S. Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: Formulation and life cycle assessment. Appl. Math. Model. 2012, 36, 4271–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.S.; Rahman, K.S.; Chowdhury, T.; Nuthammachot, N.; Techato, K.; Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Tiong, S.K.; Sopian, K.; Amin, N. An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling. Energy Strategy Rev. 2020, 27, 100431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahama, M.; Derkyi, N.S.A.; Nwabue, C.M. Challenges of renewable energy development and deployment in Ghana: Perspectives from developers. GeoJournal 2021, 86, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, N.J.; Rice, J.L. Developing renewable energy supply in Queensland, Australia: A study of the barriers, targets, policies and actions. Renew. Energy 2012, 44, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, H.; Fifita, S.; Talab, I.; Marschel, C.; Cabeza, L.F. Critical challenges and capacity building needs for renewable energy deployment in Pacific Small Island Developing States (Pacific SIDS). Renew. Energy 2017, 107, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sources | Type of PV Cell | Output Efficiency | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Saga et al. [25] | Monocrystalline | >25% | Improved efficiency and reduced manufacturing costs through diamond-wire sawing. |
Dharmadasa et al. [31] | CdTe Thin-film | 22.1% | High conversion efficiency and low manufacturing costs for commercial-scale applications. |
Nakamura et al. [32] | Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) | 23.35% | High-efficiency, low-cost, and lightweight solar cells suitable for various applications. |
Yoo et al. [33] | Perovskite | 25.2% | Rapid advancements in perovskite solar cells with commercialization potential. |
Al-Ashouri et al. [34] | Tandem | 29.15% | Four-terminal perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with high conversion efficiency. |
Hallam et al. [39] | Silicon | 25.7% | ALD passivation layers enhance silicon solar cell performance. |
Geisg et al. [41] | Multi-junction | 47.1% | Four-junction solar cell with high conversion efficiency. |
Cao et al. [44] | Perovskite | 25.2% | Earth-abundant tin-based perovskite materials for low-cost PV technologies. |
Ansari et al. [48] | Gallium Arsenide | 28.3% | Gallium arsenide solar cells with potential for high conversion efficiency. |
Morales-Acevedo et al. [49] | Dye-sensitized | 11.3% | Enhanced efficiency and stability of dye-sensitized solar cells using improved materials. |
Liu et al. [50] | Organic–Inorganic Hybrid | 11% | Enhanced efficiency and thermal stability of organic–inorganic hybrid solar cells. |
Zielke et al. [51] | Silicon Heterojunction | 17.4% | High-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells with reduced recombination losses. |
Pandey et al. [52] | Perovskite–Silicon Tandem | 30.7% | Record efficiency for perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells, demonstrating great potential. |
Pandey et al. [53] | Quantum Dot | 12.1% | Quantum dot solar cells with tunable bandgaps for efficient energy conversion. |
Sahli et al. [54] | Perovskite–Silicon Tandem | 25.2% | Improved performance and stability of perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells. |
Ma et al. [55] | Ternary Organic | 17.5% | Ternary organic solar cells with enhanced PV performance. |
Schmidt-Mende et al. [56] | Dye-sensitized | 6.3% | Efficiency improvements and enhanced stability of dye-sensitized solar cells. |
Carrillo et al. [57] | Perovskite | 20.3% | Lead-free perovskite solar cells with competitive efficiency and stability. |
Descoeudres et al. [58] | Silicon Heterojunction | 21.38% | Silicon heterojunction solar cells with improved rear-side passivation for higher efficiency. |
Philipps et al. [59] | III–V Multijunction | 41.6% | High-efficiency III–V multijunction solar cells with potential for space applications. |
Sung et al. [60] | Graphene-Based | 17.1% | Graphene-based solar cells with enhanced electron transport properties. |
Barraud et al. [61] | Silicon Heterojunction | 22.1% | Silicon heterojunction solar cells with improved rear passivation and carrier collection. |
Sources | Type of Solar Thermal System | Output Efficiency | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Mazarrón et al. [73] | Active Solar Water Heating Systems | 60% to 70% | Active systems achieve higher efficiencies and consistent hot water supply, suitable for various regions. |
Ozsoy et al. [74] | Passive Solar Water Heating System | 50% to 60% | Passive systems provide hot water with energy savings and environmental benefits, viable for moderate sunlight regions. |
Elsheniti et al. [75] | Solar Water Heating System | 65% to 72% | Solar water heating systems achieve significant energy savings, reducing reliance on conventional energy sources for water heating. |
He et al. [76] | Solar Water Heating System | 70% to 85% | Integration with a heat pump achieves higher energy efficiency and a consistent hot water supply, even under unfavorable weather conditions. |
Kumar et al. [77] | Solar Air Heating System | 60% | A fin-and-tube heat exchanger achieves a thermal efficiency of 60%, with significant energy savings compared with conventional heating methods. |
El-Sebaii et al. [78] | Solar Air Heating System | 68% | A double-pass air collector increases thermal efficiency and improves heat transfer, suitable for space heating in residential buildings. |
Krishnananth et al. [79] | Solar Air Heater | 80% | A solar air heater integrated with heat storage achieves continuous and efficient space heating with stable and reliable heat transfer. |
Liu et al. [80] | Solar Power Tower System | 49.66% | An sCO2 power tower system achieves higher thermal efficiency and cost competitiveness for large-scale solar power generation. |
Siva et al. [81] | Solar Concentrators and Power Towers | N/A | Achievements in thermal energy storage at temperatures above 1000 °C, enabling continuous and dispatchable solar power generation. |
Kumar et al. [82] | Solar Power Tower System | $8.23/kg of H2 | Solar power tower technology shows cost effectiveness and scalability for large-scale hydrogen production in India. |
Wang et al. [87] | Nanofluids in Solar Thermal Systems | 18.7% enhancement | Nanofluids significantly improve heat transfer performance in solar thermal collectors. |
Pu et al. [88] | Microchannel Heat Exchangers | 1.86 times | Microchannel heat exchangers improve heat transfer and energy efficiency for solar air heating applications. |
Basbous et al. [89] | Nanofluids in Solar Thermal Systems | 43.5% enhancement | Copper oxide nanofluids significantly improve the heat transfer coefficient and overall thermal performance in solar collectors. |
Nguyen et al. [66] | Micro-structured Surfaces | 42% enhancement | Micro-structured surfaces significantly enhance heat transfer by promoting turbulence and increasing the effective surface area for heat exchange. |
Selvakumar et al. [91] | Selective Solar Absorber Coating | 95% solar absorptance, 10% thermal emittance | Carbon-nanotube-based coating exhibits high solar absorptance and low thermal emittance, enabling efficient solar energy absorption and minimizing thermal radiation losses. |
Elsanusi et al. [92] | PCM-based Heat Exchangers | 25% efficiency improvement | PCM-based storage improves overall system efficiency and reduces energy losses during storage and retrieval. |
Mazman et al. [93] | PCMs in Solar Thermal Systems | 70% energy storage increase | PCMs enhance energy storage capacity, improve system efficiency, and facilitate utilization of solar energy during non-sunlight hours. |
Liu et al. [94] | Composite Materials in Solar Absorbers | 92% solar absorptance | Composite-material-based solar absorbers significantly enhance solar absorption and thermal conductivity. |
Razmi et al. [95] | Solar Thermal Biomass-Based CHP | 78.5% overall energy conversion efficiency | A hybrid system achieves higher overall energy conversion efficiency and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. |
Chen et al. [96] | Solar Thermal Industrial CHP | 15% overall energy efficiency increase | Integration of solar thermal collectors with CHP units increases overall energy efficiency and provides a more reliable energy supply for industrial processes. |
Corbin et al. [97] | Solar Thermal and PVT Collectors | 66% thermal efficiency, 16% electrical efficiency | Hybrid PVT systems demonstrate improved energy utilization and are a promising option for sustainable energy generation |
Sources | Type of Energy Storage | Output Efficiency | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Vieira et al. [101] | Lithium-ion Battery | 30% to 60% | An integrated battery system improved self-consumption of solar energy and reduced reliance on grid electricity. |
Roberts et al. [102] | Battery Energy Storage | 30% to >70% | BESS increased self-consumption of solar energy, resulting in a significant reduction in grid electricity purchases. |
Qusay et al. [103] | Lithium-ion Battery | Up to 42% | A lithium-ion battery system improved self-consumption rates, leading to substantial savings in electricity costs. |
Beevers et al. [105] | Pumped Hydro Storage | Up to 50 GW | Pumped hydro storage provided flexible capacity, enabling a higher solar energy share in the electricity mix. |
Chaudhary et al. [106] | Pumped Hydro Storage | Up to 50% | Pumped hydro storage reduced curtailment of solar PV energy, enabling higher solar PV penetration into the grid. |
Gioutsos et al. [107] | Pumped Hydro Storage | Up to 70% | Pumped hydro storage allowed for up to 70% solar energy penetration, improving system flexibility and stability. |
Nguyen et al. [113] | Vanadium Redox Flow Battery | 80–90% | VRFB systems achieved high round-trip efficiency and long-duration storage capabilities. |
Monforti et al. [114] | Hydrogen Storage | 35–40% | A hydrogen storage system achieved significant long-duration storage capabilities with moderate round-trip efficiency. |
Elberry et al. [115] | Hydrogen Storage | High storage density and long-duration capabilities | Hydrogen storage systems achieved long-duration storage of several months. |
Jia et al. [116] | Lithium-ion Battery with Silicon Anode | Enhanced energy density and cycle life | Silicon anode batteries demonstrated promise for long-lasting and high-capacity solar energy storage. |
Wessells et al. [117] | Advanced Lithium-ion Battery | 90% | Advanced lithium-ion batteries exhibited high round-trip efficiency and cycle life, suitable for long-lasting storage. |
Dong et al. [118] | Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery | 97% | LiFePO4 batteries demonstrated high round-trip efficiency and long cycle life, showcasing high durability. |
Jaszczur et al. [123] | Battery Energy Storage | 30% to 80% | Integration of a battery system improved PV energy self-consumption, reducing reliance on grid electricity. |
Appen et al. [124] | Battery Energy Storage | 34% to 69% | Battery integration increased PV system self-consumption and reduced grid reliance, enhancing solar energy utilization. |
Boukelia et al. [125] | Thermal Storage | Up to 33% | Thermal storage integration improved solar thermal power plant capacity factor, enabling continuous power generation. |
Lu et al. [126] | Grid-scale Storage | Flexible Capacity | Grid-scale storage (pumped hydro and batteries) provided flexibility for higher solar energy penetration into the grid. |
Chatzigeorgiou et al. [127] | Grid-scale Battery Energy Storage | 24% to 80% | Grid-scale BESS increased self-consumption of solar energy and reduced grid reliance, impacting solar energy utilization. |
Johnson et al. [128] | Grid-scale Storage | 40% to 80% | Grid-scale storage increased solar energy penetration, improving grid stability and reliability. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hasan, M.M.; Hossain, S.; Mofijur, M.; Kabir, Z.; Badruddin, I.A.; Yunus Khan, T.M.; Jassim, E. Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions. Energies 2023, 16, 6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186456
Hasan MM, Hossain S, Mofijur M, Kabir Z, Badruddin IA, Yunus Khan TM, Jassim E. Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions. Energies. 2023; 16(18):6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186456
Chicago/Turabian StyleHasan, M. M., Shakhawat Hossain, M. Mofijur, Zobaidul Kabir, Irfan Anjum Badruddin, T. M. Yunus Khan, and Esam Jassim. 2023. "Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions" Energies 16, no. 18: 6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186456
APA StyleHasan, M. M., Hossain, S., Mofijur, M., Kabir, Z., Badruddin, I. A., Yunus Khan, T. M., & Jassim, E. (2023). Harnessing Solar Power: A Review of Photovoltaic Innovations, Solar Thermal Systems, and the Dawn of Energy Storage Solutions. Energies, 16(18), 6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186456