Abstract
Let be a Schrödinger operator, where the potential V belongs to the reverse Hölder class. By the subordinative formula, we introduce the fractional heat semigroup , associated with L. By the aid of the fundamental solution of the heat equation: we estimate the gradient and the time-fractional derivatives of the fractional heat kernel , respectively. This method is independent of the Fourier transform, and can be applied to the second-order differential operators whose heat kernels satisfy the Gaussian upper bounds. As an application, we establish a Carleson measure characterization of the Campanato-type space via the fractional heat semigroup .
JEL Classification:
35J10; 42B20; 42B30
1. Introduction
The aim of this paper is to investigate the fractional heat semigroup of Schrödinger operators
where denotes the Laplace operator , and V is a non-negative potential belonging to the reverse Hölder class .
Definition 1.
A non-negative locally integrable function V on is said to belong to if there exists such that the reverse Hölder inequality,
holds for every ball B in .
This kind of operator was firstly noted in the famous paper by C. Fefferman [1]. For the special case , , the fractional heat semigroup can be defined via the Fourier transform:
In the literature, the fractional heat semigroup has been widely used in the study of partial differential equations, harmonic analysis, potential theory, and modern probability theory. For example, the semigroup is usually applied to construct the linear part of solutions to fluid equations in mathematical physics, e.g., the generalized Navier–Stokes equation, the quasi-geostrophic equation, and the generalized MHD equations. In the field of probability theory, the researchers use to describe some kind of Markov process with jumps. For further information and the related applications of fractional heat semigroups , we refer the reader to [2,3,4,5].
Denote, by , the integral kernel of , i.e.,
and denote, by , the integral kernel of . In [6], by an invariant derivative technique and the Fourier analysis method, Miao–Yuan–Zhang concluded that the kernels and satisfy the following pointwise estimates, respectively (cf., [6], Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2):
Compared with , for arbitrary Schrödinger operator L with the non-negative potential V, the fractional heat semigroup , can not be defined via (2). In addition, it is obvious that the methods in [6] are invalid for the estimation of the integral kernels of . In this paper, by the functional calculus, we observe that the integral kernel of the Poisson semigroup associated with L can be defined as:
where denotes the integral kernel of , i.e.,
Recall that is a positive, symmetric function on , and satisfies . Generally, for , the subordinative formula (cf., [3]) indicates that there exists a continuous function on , such that:
The identity (5) enables us to estimate via the heat kernel . Let be the auxiliary function defined by (12) below. In Propositions 7 and 8, we can obtain the following pointwise estimates of : for every , there exists a constant , such that:
and for every , , and all , there exists a constant , such that:
Based on the estimates (6) and (7), we consider the regularity properties of . Let denote the gradient operator on , that is, , where . Generally speaking, for a differential operator L, if the semigroup is analytic, then the estimate of the derivative in time of integral kernels can be deduced. However, for the derivatives in spatial variables, it is relatively difficult. Specially, let be the Hermite operators. The heat kernel related to H, denoted by , can be expressed precisely. Hence, the derivative can be obtained via a direct computation. (cf., [7,8]). For a general Schrödinger operator, obviously, there does not exist an exact expression of , and the regularity estimates of cannot be obtained directly as the case of the Hermite operator H. Alternatively, we obtain an energy estimate of the solution to the equation:
By the fundamental solution of , we prove that, for any , there exists a constant , such that:
in Lemma 8. A direct computation, together with the subordinative formula, gives:
see Proposition 11. By a similar method, we obtain the Hölder regularity of , i.e., for and ,
see Proposition 12.
In Section 3.3, we focus on the time-fractional derivatives of . Recently, there has been an increasing interest in fractional calculus, since time-fractional operators are proven to be very useful for modeling purposes. For example, the following fractional heat equations,
are used to describe heat propagation in inhomogeneous media. It is known that, as opposed to the classical heat equation, Equation (9) is known to exhibit sub-diffusive behaviour and is related to anomalous diffusions or diffusions in non-homogeneous media, with random fractal structures. Recall that the fractional derivative of is defined as:
For some recent works in the frame of confromable derivatives and Mittag–Leffler kernels, see [9,10]. In Section 3.1, we first obtain the regularity estimates of denoted by ; see Proposition 9. Then, the desired estimates of can be deduced from (10) and Proposition 9; see Propositions 14–16, respectively.
As an application, in Section 4, we characterize the Camapnato-type spaces associated with L, denoted by , via the fractional heat semigroup . In the last decades, the characterizations of function spaces associated with Schrödinger operators via semigroups and Carleson measures have attracted the attention of many authors. Let , . Using the family of operators , the Carleson measure characterization of was obtained by Dziubański–Garrigós–Martínez–Torrea–Zienkiewicz [11]. Replacing the potential V by a general Radon measure , in [12], Wu–Yan extended the result of [11] to generalized Schrödinger operators. The analogue in the setting of Heisenberg groups was obtained by Lin–Liu [13]. Ma–Stinga–Torrea–Zhang [14] characterized the Campanato-type spaces associated with L via the fractional derivatives of the Poisson semigroup. For further information on this topic, we refer to [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] and the references therein. Assume that , with . By the regularity estimates obtained in Section 3, we establish the following equivalent characterizations: for ,
where See Theorems 3 and 4, respectively.
Remark 1.
- (i)
- The regularity estimates obtained in this paper generalize several results on the regularities of the Schrödinger operators. Letting , is the Poisson kernel associated with the Schrödinger operator. For this case, Propositions 11 and 12 come back to ([15], Lemma 3.9). Moreover, the regularities of obtained in Section 3.3 generalize ([14], Proposition 3.6, (b), (c), and (d)).
- (ii)
- The regularity results for obtained in Section 3.2 all are pointwise estimations, which is stronger than the norm estimates. As a corollary of Lemma 8, by a trivial computation, we can obtain the estimates appearing in ([22], Lemma 2.1) in our suitable setting; see Proposition 10.
Remark 2.
For the case of , the regularities of have been studied by Ma–Stinga–Torrea–Zhang [14]. We point out that our method is slightly different from that of [14]. In [14], via the Hermite polynomials , the authors converted the estimate of to the estimate of ; see ([14], (3.12)). In Section 3.3, we estimate the time-fractional derivatives of via , instead of the Hermite polynomials.
Remark 3.
- (i)
- In the regularity estimates of , one of the main tools is the subordinative formula. Due to the analytic property of the heat semigroup , the estimates of can be deduced from the Cauchy integral formula. Then, we can use the subordinative formula to obtain the related estimates of . However, for the derivatives of in the spatial variables, i.e., , the method of is invalid and we need a more technical estimate; see Lemmas 8–11 for details.
- (ii)
Some notations:
- represents that there is a constant , such that , whose right inequality is also written as . Similarly, one writes for ;
- For convenience, the positive constants C may change from one line to another and usually depend on the dimension , and other fixed parameters;
- Let B be a ball with the radius r. In the rest of this paper, for , we denote by the ball with the same center and radius .
2. Preliminaries
2.1. The Schrödinger Operator
Let be the Schrödinger operator on Throughout the paper, we will assume that V is a nonzero, non-negative potential, and that it belongs to the reverse Hölder class , which is defined in Definition 1. By Hölder’s inequality, we can obtain for . One remarkable feature about the class is that if for some , then there exists , which depends only on n and the constant C in (1), such that . It is also well known that if , then is a doubling measure. Namely, for any ,
The auxiliary function is defined by:
Clearly, for every , and if , then For simplicity, we sometimes denote by in the proofs. We state some properties of which will be used in the proofs of the main results.
Lemma 1.
([23], Lemma 1.2)There exists a constant , such that for every and , we have:
Lemma 2.
([24], Lemma 3) For every constant , there exists a constant , such that if
then .
Lemma 3.
([23], Lemma 1.4) For every constant , there is a constant , such that:
for Moreover, there exist constants , such that
Lemma 4.
([23], Lemma 1.8) There exist constants , such that for ,
Lemma 5.
As a corollary of ([26], Corollary 4.8), we have:
Lemma 6.
There exist constants C, δ, and l, such that:
Since the potential V is non-negative, it follows from the Feynman–Kac formula that the kernels have a Gaussian upper bound:
Furthermore,
Proposition 1.
([27], Theorem 4.10) For every , there exist constants and c, such that for all
Proposition 2.
([27], Proposition 4.11) For every and every , there exist constants and c, such that for ,
Remark 4.
By Proposition 1, it is easy to see that the condition in Proposition 2 can be replaced by .
Let , . Then,
Proposition 3.
([28], Proposition 3.3) Let
- (i)
- For every , there exist constants and , such that:
- (ii)
- Let , where appears in Proposition 2. For every , there exist constants and c, such that for ,
- (iii)
- For every and , there exists a constant , such that:
2.2. Fractional Heat Kernels Associated with L
In this section, we first state some backgrounds on the fractional heat semigroup and the fractional heat kernel associated with L. For the case , the fractional heat semigroup associated with L can not be defined using the Fourier multiplier method (2) as the Laplace operator. We strike out on a new path and introduce the fractional heat semigroup via the subordinative formula.
The Schrödinger operator L can be seen as the generator of the semigroup , i.e.,
where the limit is in . L is a self-adjointed, positive operator. The integral kernels of the semigroups are denoted by . It is easy to verify that the kernel satisfies the following:
For , the fractional power of L, denoted by , is defined as:
Here, denotes the Poisson semigroup related to L, with the kernel defined as:
By the subordinative formula, we know that there exists a non-negative continuous function satisfying (cf., [3]):
such that can be expressed as:
see [3] for some examples of . The function plays an important role in the estimate of the fractional heat kernel . Take for example: by (4), we can see that It is easy to verify that such satisfies conditions in (14). For the special case , a direct computation gives:
which coincides with the classical Poisson kernel obtained via (3).
2.3. Campanato-Type Spaces Associated with L
The Campanato-type space associated with L is defined as follows:
Definition 2.
The space , is defined as the set of all locally integrable functions f, satisfying that there exists a constant C, such that:
where the supremum is taken over all balls B centered at with radius , and:
The norm is defined as the infimum of the constants C, such that (16), above, holds.
Proposition 4.
([14], Proposition 4.3) Let with . If , then there exists a constant , such that .
The space is equivalent to the following Lipschitz-type space related to L:
Definition 3.
For , a continuous function f defined on belongs to the space if
Proposition 5.
([14], Proposition 4.6) If , then the spaces and are equal, and their norms are equivalent.
It is well known that Hardy spaces , are the predual spaces of Campanato spaces (cf. [29]). In the 2000s, such a dual relationship was extended to function spaces associated with operators; see [11,30,31,32,33,34]. For Schrödinger operator L, the following Hardy-type spaces, , were introduced in [26,27]:
Definition 4.
For , an integrable function f is an element of the Hardy-type space if the maximal function
belongs to . The quasi-norm in is defined by:
Let and . An atom of associated with a ball is a function a, such that:
In [27], Dziubański and Zienkiewicz obtained the following atomic characterization of :
Proposition 6.
([27], Theorem 1.13) Let . if and only if , where are -atoms and .
Theorem 1.
([14], Theorem 4.5) Let . Then, the dual space of is . More precisely, any continuous linear functional Φ over can be represented as
for some function and all -atoms a. Moreover, the operator norm .
Lemma 7.
([14], Lemma 5.4) Let be a function of , . Assume that for every , there exists a constant , such that for some ,
Then, for every -atom g supported on , there exists , such that:
3. Regularities on Fractional Heat Semigroups Associated with L
The aim of this section is to estimate the regularities of the fractional heat kernel . By the use of (5), we first estimate Then, via the solution to (8), we investigate the spatial gradient of . At last, we obtain the estimation of the time-fractional derivatives of .
3.1. Regularities of the Fractional Heat Kernel
We first investigate the regularities of .
Proposition 7.
Let and . For every , there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
By changing variables, we have:
Let . Then,
which gives:
On the other hand, using the change of variables again, we obtain:
The above estimate implies that:
This completes the proof of Proposition 7. □
Proposition 8.
Let and . For any , there exists a constant , such that for every and all ,
Proof.
The proof is similar to that of Proposition 7. We first assume that . By the subordinative Formula (15), we can use Proposition 2 to obtain, for any , a constant , such that:
which implies:
On the other hand, letting , we have:
This gives:
Due to the arbitrariness of , we have:
This proves Proposition 8 under the assumption .
Now, we prove this proposition for the case . For or , the desired estimate can be deduced from (19) and (20). The case remains to be considered. We split:
where
For , since , we can follow the procedure of (20) to deduce that:
We further divide into , where
Noticing , for , it follows from Proposition 7 that:
For , similarly, we use Proposition 7, again, to deduce that:
which, together with the arbitrariness of N, indicates that:
Because , by Lemma 3, it holds that:
which gives:
The estimates for and , together with , imply that:
□
For and , define: We can obtain the following estimates about the kernel: .
Proposition 9.
Let , , , and , where appears in Proposition 2.
- (i)
- For any , there exists a constant , such that:
- (ii)
- Let . For any , there exists a constant , such that for all ,
- (iii)
- Let . For any , there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
For (i), since ,
Hence,
By (i) of Proposition 3 and the higher-order derivative formula of the composite function, we can obtain:
Notice that . By changing the variables, we obtain:
On the other hand,
Finally, we have proved that, for arbitrary ,
which gives:
For (ii), via the subordinative Formula (15), we can complete the proof by using (ii) of Proposition 3. We omit the details.
For (iii), it is easy to see that Hence,
It follows from (iii) of Proposition 3 that:
If , since , then:
If , then:
Because the function is continuous, the integral . On the other hand, recalling that , we obtain:
which implies that:
□
3.2. Estimation on the Spatial Gradient
In this section, we investigate the spatial gradient of , . For the special case , i.e., the Poisson kernel, the regularity estimates have been obtained in ([15], Lemma 3.9).
Lemma 8.
Suppose that for some . For every , there exist constants and , such that for all and , the kernels satisfy the following estimates:
Proof.
Let be the fundamental solution of in , i.e.,
where denotes the area of the unit sphere in . Fix and . Assume that is a weak solution to the equation:
Let , with some , such that , , and Noticing that , we can obtain:
which, together with integration by parts, gives:
Then we can obtain:
Notice that it follows from Lemma 5 that (cf., [23], (1.7)):
Thus, for , it holds that:
Take and . We obtain:
If , then . Additionally, for . It follows, from Propositions 1 and 3, that for any there exists a constant , such that:
Finally, it can be deduced from (21) that:
The rest of the proof is divided into three cases:
Case 1: . For this case, . We split
where
It is obvious that:
Similarly, for the term , we can also obtain:
Case 2: . We write:
Because , taking the infimum for R yields:
Case 3: . Similarly, we can see that:
Since , the function is decreasing and with the infimum at . Then,
Case 3.2: . For this case, by (22) again, it holds that:
Finally, we obtain the following estimates:
Then, if ,
This proves Lemma 8. □
Our spatial gradient estimates in this paper all are pointwise estimations, which is stronger than the norm estimates. From the spatial gradient estimates in Lemma 8, we can obtain the estimates appearing in ([22], Lemma 2.1) in the following.
Proposition 10.
Suppose that for some , . For , the spatial derivative of satisfies the following -estimate and -estimate, respectively.
Proof.
We only give the details for the -estimate, and the estimate for can be dealt with similarly. By Lemma 8, we obtain:
where
By the change of variables, we can obtain:
For , applying the change of variables again,
Case 1: . For this case, it is obvious that .
Case 2: . Then, we spilt , where:
Obviously, . For , we have:
where
Noting that
we can obtain . □
Lemma 9.
Suppose that for some . For every , there exists a constant , such that for all and , the semigroup kernels satisfy the following estimate:
Proof.
Assume that is a weak solution of the equation
Similar to Lemma 8, we can prove that for all ,
Take for fixed , and let . It can be deduced from Propositions 1 and 3 that:
This, together with , implies that:
If , note that the function is decreasing on . Taking the infimum again, we obtain:
This completes the proof of Lemma 9. □
Now, we give the gradient estimate of .
Proposition 11.
Suppose and for some . For every , there exists a constant , such that for all and ,
Proof.
The subordinate formula gives:
which, together with Lemma 8, implies that where:
For , letting , we can obtain:
Similarly, for the term , a change of variables yields:
The estimates for and indicate that:
On the other hand, by Lemma 9 and changing variables , we obtain:
Finally, we obtain:
The arbitrariness of N indicates that:
□
Below, we estimate the Lipschitz continuity of .
Lemma 10.
Suppose that and for some . Let . For every , there exist constants and , such that for all , and ,
Proof.
The proof is similar to that of Lemma 8. Let be the fundamental solution of in . Assume that . Let , such that on , , and . It is easy to see that:
Similar to the proof of Lemma 8, an integration by parts implies that:
which yields:
Then, for , , and
which gives , where:
Now, we estimate the terms separately. For the term , because it is well known that is a Calderón–Zygmund kernel (see [35]), we have:
The estimate of is similar to that of . Noting that on , we can obtain:
For and , a direct computation gives and
Additionally,
Following the same procedure, we apply the Young inequality to obtain:
At last, for the term , by Lemma 5 and the condition , we can obtain, via the -boundedness of the operator with the kernel , the following:
The estimates for indicate that:
Let . Then,
Take . If , then , that is, . Moreover, if , , which means that . We can obtain:
Define a function . Then, we can see that for , , i.e., F is increasing, which means that the function is decreasing for . Below, we divide the rest of the proof into two cases:
Case 1: . We further divide the discussion into two subcases:
Case 1.1: , i.e., . For this case, the function has the infimum for . Then, taking the infimum for R on both sides of (24), we can use the fact that to obtain:
Case 1.2: , i.e., . Similar to Case 1.1, taking the infimum for gives:
Then, we obtain:
It is easy to see that:
Case 2: . Similar to Case 1, we divide the discussion into two subcases again:
Case 2.1: . It follows from (24) that:
Taking the infimum on both sides (25) reaches:
Case 2.2: . Similarly, taking the infimum on both sides of (25), we obtain:
If , then:
If , we have:
If , then:
If , then:
□
Lemma 11.
Suppose that for some . Let . For every , there exists a constant , such that for all and , the semigroup kernels satisfy the following estimate: for ,
Proof.
Similar to Lemma 10, we take and obtain:
Case 1: . This implies . We can obtain:
Case 2: . For this case, . Then, the following two cases are considered:
It is obvious that Case 2.1 comes back to Case 1. For Case 2.2, letting on the right-hand side of (26), we have:
□
Proposition 12.
Suppose that and for some . Let . For every , there exists a constant , such that for all and , the fractional heat kernels satisfy the following estimate: for ,
Proof.
By the subordinative formula and Lemma 10, we can obtain:
where
We first estimate and apply a change of variables to obtain:
Similarly, for , we have:
which gives:
On the other hand, we can deduce from Lemma 11 that:
Finally, the arbitrariness of N indicates that:
which proves Proposition 12. □
Proposition 13.
Assume that for some . Let . For every ,
Proof.
We divide the proof into two cases:
Case 1: . By Proposition 11, we use a direct computation to obtain:
Because , then
We claim that:
In fact, by Lemma 8, we have , where:
Taking N as large enough, it is easy to see that:
Similarly, a direct calculus gives, together with changing variables: ,
Then, we can deduce from (27) that:
For , it follows from the perturbation formula (see [36], p. 497, (2.3), also [11], (5.25)), that:
and that for ,
Therefore, noting that , we can use the change of variables to obtain:
□
3.3. Estimation on Time-Fractional Derivatives
In this section, we give some gradient estimates for the fractional heat kernel associated with the variable t. Define an operator:
Denote, by , the integral kernel of . Then, we can obtain the following proposition:
Proposition 14.
Let , and . For every , there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
The following two cases are considered:
Case 1: . It is easy to see that:
which, together with Proposition 9, gives:
On the other hand, since ,
By Proposition 3, we can obtain:
By the arbitrariness of N, we obtain:
Case 2: . Let . We can obtain:
It follows from Proposition 9 that:
On the other hand, we obtain:
which indicates that (30) holds. □
In the next proposition, we give the Lipschitz continuity of .
Proposition 15.
Let , , and . Let . For every , there exists a constant , such that for all ,
Proof.
It is equivalent to verify:
Without loss of generality, for , it holds that:
By Proposition 9, we can obtain:
On the other hand, we obtain:
which implies (31). □
Proposition 16.
Let , , , and . For every , there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
Let . By (iii) of Proposition 9, we change the order of integrations to obtain:
If , then:
If , then:
which completes the proof of Proposition 16. □
4. Characterization of Campanato–Morrey Spaces Associated with L
Firstly, we deduce a reproducing formula:
Lemma 12.
Let and . The operator defines an isometry from into . Moreover, in the sense of , it holds that:
Proof.
Note that for , the spectral resolution of the operator L, it follows from
that:
Then, for , we have:
Below, we only prove that for every pair of sequences and as ,
The integral
can be dealt with similarly. □
The following inequality was established by Harboure–Salinas–Viviani [37]:
Lemma 13.
([37], (5.3))Let . For any pair of measurable functions F and G on , we have:
In Lemma 13, letting
we have:
Finally, we have:
For and , define an area function as follows:
where denotes the cone .
Lemma 14.
Let and . The area function is bounded on .
Theorem 2.
Assume that , and . Let f be a linear combination of -atoms. There exists a constant C, such that:
Proof.
Let a be an -atom associated with a ball . Then, we write:
where
We use Lemma 14 and Hölder’s inequality to obtain:
Now, we deal with in the following two cases:
Case 1: . For this case, . We write where:
We first estimate . Since , then for and . We can use Propositions 14 and 15 to deduce that there exists , such that:
Because and , then . This implies . We have:
which, via a direct computation, gives:
Let us continue with . Similarly, it follows from Proposition 15 that:
Hence, we still have
Case 2: . For this case, the atom a has no canceling condition. We have , where:
Because and , then . On the other hand, for , . This means that . We can obtain:
which indicates that:
Similarly,
Notice that for . It can be deduced from the triangle inequality that . Then,
The estimate for is similar to that of . In fact, due to ,
The estimates for and indicate that:
□
Lemma 15.
Let , be a function of and . Assume that for each , there exists a constant , such that for ,
Then, for any -atom a supported on , there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
If , then . It follows from the condition that:
Because , set , where . Then, and
which implies that . This completes the proof of Lemma 15. □
Lemma 16.
Given , and . Let for any , and let a be an -atom. Then, for
there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
Assume that a is an -atom associated with a ball . By Lemma 13 and Theorem 2, we obtain:
The inner integration satisfies the following:
By Proposition 14, we can see that:
If , then . It follows from the condition that:
If , then for any , . On the other hand, , since and . By Proposition 14, we have:
which implies that:
Because , set , where . Then, and
which implies that , and
The above estimate indicates that satisfies (36) with . On the other hand, it can be deduced from (37) and (38) that:
where
If , then , i.e., .
For , since , we have:
If , then:
If , then:
Hence, there exists a constant , such that:
Notice that
which, together with the Fubini theorem, indicates that:
For the term
we can see that
By the change of variables, we obtain:
The rest of the proof is divided into three cases:
Case 1: . For this case, . Then, a change of variables reaches:
Notice that
and, as ,
An application of integration by parts gives:
where
and where . By Proposition 7,
For ,
Case 2: . A direct computation gives:
Case 3: . Let , such that , . We obtain:
where, in the last step, we have used the change of variables: . Notice that
Then, the integration by parts yields , where and
We obtain:
where
For , since , we obtain:
Similarly, for , because , then . Noticing that , we obtain:
By Lemma 15, the above estimates in Cases 1–3 indciate that:
where
Therefore, we can use Lemma 12 to complete the proof. □
Finally, we can obtain the following characterization of corresponding to the time-fractional derivative:
Theorem 3.
Let . Assume that , , and Let f be a function, such that:
for some . The following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- There exists , such that ;
- (iii)
- For all ,
Proof.
(i)⟹(ii). If , then , where:
For I, we have:
We further divide the estimation of into the following two cases:
Case 1: . By Proposition 14,
Case 2: . We use Proposition 16 to obtain that there exists , such that:
(ii)⟹(iii). Assume that (ii) holds. Then,
(iii)⟹(i). Assume that (40) holds. Let a be an -atom associated with . Then, by Lemma 16,
which, together with (34) and Theorem 2, gives:
Hence,
is a bounded linear functional on ; equivalently, . □
Below, we consider the characterization of via the the spatial gradient. Define a general gradient as .
Theorem 4.
Let . Assume that , , and Let f be a function satisfying (39). The following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- There exists a constant , such that:
- (iii)
- satisfies that, for any balls
Proof.
(i) ⟹ (ii). Let . By Theorem 3, One writes:
We first estimate the term I. Because , then Since
and a direct computation gives:
By Proposition 13, we have:
The estimate of is divided into two cases:
Case 1: . implies that . Then,
Case 2: . We can obtain:
(ii)⟹(iii). For every ball ,
which implies that (41) holds.
(iii)⟹(i). Assume that (41) holds. For any ball , it holds that:
It is a corollary of Theorem 3 that with
□
A positive measure on is called a -Carleson measure if
The following result can be deduced from Theorem 4 immediately:
Theorem 5.
Let . Assume that , , and , with
Let be a measure defined by:
- (i)
- If , then is a -Carleson measure;
- (ii)
- Conversely, if and is a -Carleson measure, then .
Moreover, in any case, there exists a constant , such that:
Proof.
(i). In Theorem 3, letting , we obtain for ,
which, together with a change of variable, gives:
The estimation
can be obtained in the manner of Theorem 3.
(ii). Assume that is a -Carleson measure, i.e.,
Subsequently,
It can be deduced from Theorem 4 that . □
5. Conclusions
In this paper, with the aid of the fundamental solution of the heat equation associated with the Schrödinger operators, we estimate the gradient and the time-fractional derivatives of the fractional heat kernel , respectively. Finally, as an application, we establish a Carleson measure characterization of the Campanato-type space via the fractional heat semigroup .
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.L.; writing—review and editing P.L., Z.W. and C.Z.; supervision, T.Q.; visualization, Z.W.; investigation, P.L., T.Q., Z.W. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
P. Li was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12071272, 11871293) and the Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. ZR2020MA004). T. Qian was supported by Macao Government Science and Technology Foundation FDCT0123/2018/A3. C. Zhang was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LY22A010011) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11971431).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Fefferman, C. The uncertainty principle. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 1983, 9, 129–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, D.; Xiao, J. Lq-extensions of Lp-spaces by fractional diffusion equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2015, 35, 1905–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grigor’yan, A. Heat kernels and function theory on metric measure spaces. Contemp. Math. 2002, 338, 143–172. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, R.; Xiao, J.; Yang, D.; Zhai, Z. Regularity and capacity for the fractional dissipative operator. J. Diff. Equ. 2015, 259, 3495–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, Z. Strichartz type estimates for fractional heat equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 356, 642–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Miao, C.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, B. Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the fractional power dissipative equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68, 461–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangavelu, S. Riesz transforms and wave equation for the Hermite operator. Comm. Part. Differ. Equ. 1990, 15, 1199–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangavelu, S. Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expansions; Mathematical Notes 42; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Hyder, A.; Soliman, A.; Cesarano, C.; Barakat, M. Solving theSchrödinger–Hirota equation in a stochastic environment andUtilizing generalized derivatives of the conformable type. Mathematics 2021, 9, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yavuz, M.; Sulaiman, T.; Yusuf, A.; Abdeljawad, T. The Schrödinger-KdV equation of fractional order with Mittag-Leffler nonsingular kernel. Alexand. Eng. J. 2021, 60, 2715–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziubański, J.; Garrigós, G.; Martínez, T.; Torrea, J.; Zienkiewicz, J. BMO spaces related to Schrödinger operators with potentials satisfying a reverse Hölder inequality. Math. Z. 2005, 249, 329–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Yan, L. Heat kernels, upper bounds and Hardy spaces associated to the generalized Schrödinger operators. J. Funct. Anal. 2016, 270, 3709–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Liu, H. BMOL(Hn) spaces and Carleson measures for Schrödinger operators. Adv. Math. 2011, 228, 1631–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, T.; Stinga, P.; Torrea, J.; Zhang, C. Regularity properties of Schrödinger operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 388, 817–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, X.; Yan, L.; Zhang, C. On characterization of Poisson integrals of Schrödinger operators with BMO traces. J. Funct. Anal. 2014, 266, 2053–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, X.; Yan, L. New function spaces of BMO type, the John-Nirenberg inequality, interpolation, and applications. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2010, 58, 1375–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Zhang, C. Characterization of temperatures associated to Schrödinger operators with initial data in Morrey spaces. Taiwan. J. Math. 2019, 23, 1133–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, L.; Tian, X.; Yan, L. On characterization of Poisson integrals of Schrödinger operators with Morrey traces. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 2018, 34, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Yang, D.; Zhou, Y. Localized Campanato-type spaces related to admissible functions on RD-spaces and applications to Schrödinger operators. Nagoya Math. J. 2010, 198, 77–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Zhang, C. Characterization of temperatures associated to Schrödinger operators with initial data in BMO spaces. Math. Nachr. 2021, 294, 2021–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, R.; Li, B. On the Dirichlet problem for the Schrödinger equation with boundary value in BMO space. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2006.05248. [Google Scholar]
- Dziubański, J.; Preisner, M. On Riesz transforms characterization of H1 spaces associated with some Schrödinger operators. Potent. Anal. 2011, 35, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Shen, Z. Lp estimates for Schrödinger operators with certain potentials. Ann. Inst. Fourier 1995, 45, 513–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurata, K.; Sugano, S. Fundamental solution, eigenvalue asymptotics and eigenfunctions of degenerate elliptic operators with positive potentials. Studia Math. 2000, 138, 101–119. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Z.; Li, P.; Peng, L. Lp boundedness of commutator of Riesz transform associated to Schrodinger operator. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 341, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziubański, J. Note on H1 spaces related to degenerate Schrödinger operators. Ill. J. Math. 2005, 49, 1271–1297. [Google Scholar]
- Dziubański, J.; Zienkiewicz, J. Hp spaces associated with Schrödinger operators with potentials from reverse Hölder classes. Colloq. Math. 2003, 98, 5–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Li, P.; Liu, Y. Regularity properties of the heat kernel and area integral characterization of Hardy space HL1 related to degenerate Schrödinger operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2018, 466, 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fefferman, C.; Stein, E.M. Hp spaces of several variables. Acta Math. 1972, 129, 137–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Tang, L.; Zhu, H. Weighted Hardy spaces and BMO spaces associated with Schrödinger operators. Math. Nachr. 2012, 285, 2173–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, X.; Yan, L. Duality of Hardy and BMO spaces associated with operators with heat kernel bounds. J. Am. Math. Soc. 2005, 18, 943–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziubański, J.; Zienkiewicz, J. Hardy space H1 associated to Schrödinger operator with potential satisfying reverse Hölder inequality. Rev. Mat. Iberoam 1999, 15, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, S.; Lu, G.; Mitrea, D.; Mitrea, M.; Yan, L. Hardy spaces associated to non-negative self-adjoint operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 2011, 214, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Yang, D.; Zhou, Y. Localized BMO and BLO spaces on RD-spaces and applications to Schrödinger operators. Commu. Pure Appl. Anal. 2010, 9, 779–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, E.M. Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions; Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Kato, T. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators; Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 132; Pringer: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Harboure, E.; Salinas, O.; Viviani, B. A look at BMOφ(ω) through Carleson measures. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 2007, 13, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).