Modeling and Control of Hydrogen Production Systems through Water Electrolysis and Res Power †
School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering (ECP 2024), 29–31 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECP2024.
Proceedings 2024, 105(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105051
Published: 28 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering)
The increased consumption of fossil fuels has led to scientific interest in establishing a hydrogen-based infrastructure. Currently, there are a few different electrolysis technologies for H2 production: (i) PEM, (ii) alkaline (AFC) and (iii) solid oxide (SOEC). PEM electrolysis uses a hydrated polymer membrane, with an operating temperature window of 45–85 °C and reaching power capacities of >500 kWs. AFC electrolysis uses a caustic solution as an electrolyte with operating temperatures in the range of 65–220 °C and can also reach high power capacities. Finally, SOEC units use a ceramic electrolyte with an operating temperature of 600–1000 °C and power capacities that can reach several MWs (including thermal exploitation). In terms of costs, PEM and AFC are currently the most economical and flexible solutions.
The aim of this study is the dynamic modeling and control of an electrolysis system. The modeling module is based on submodels that use a combination of electrochemical, thermal, and mass transport equations to fully describe the system operation (see Figure 1). The electrical model takes as input the electrolyzer temperature and the applied current for the voltage calculation. In the mass transfer model, the molar flows/concentrations of water, hydrogen and air (oxygen and nitrogen) are based on the provided electric current. Finally, the thermal model simulates the dynamics of heat and temperature variations as it is provided by the V-I electric model and the applied cooling utilities.
Feedback controllers have been designed for the (a) regulation of hydrogen production by manipulating the applied electric current and (b) regulation of the temperature by the manipulation of a coolant flowrate. Conventional P/PI/PID controllers, model-based controllers and optimal controllers are evaluated towards enhanced disturbance rejection and set-point tracking. Performance criteria such as ISE, IAE, ITAE and ITSE will be evaluated for the best controller selection, also based on low power consumption and high efficiency. Regarding the process control requirements for such a complicated system, this study designed feedback PID controllers (tuned via Ziegler-Nichols/Z-N and Tyreus-Luyben/T-L methodologies). Based on preliminary simulation scenarios it was found that T-L tuned PID controllers presented an exceptional performance as they incorporated reduced overshoot and oscillations along with a fast settling time. The manipulated variable was the imposed current to the electrolyzer. A sample of results is shown in Figure 2 as follows.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.D. and D.I.; methodology, All Authors; software, S.D., V.P. and D.I.; validation, S.D., V.P. and D.I.; formal analysis, All Authors; investigation, S.D., V.P. and D.I.; data curation, S.D., V.P. and D.I.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D. and D.I.; writing—review and editing, S.D. and D.I.; visualization, all Authors; supervision, all Authors; project administration, all Authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figure 1.
Description of the modular modeling approach for electrolyzer simulation.
Figure 2.
Hydrogen flowrate trajectory via feedback PID controllers.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Provatas, V.; Dapontis, S.; Konsolakis, M.; Ipsakis, D. Modeling and Control of Hydrogen Production Systems through Water Electrolysis and Res Power. Proceedings 2024, 105, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105051
AMA Style
Provatas V, Dapontis S, Konsolakis M, Ipsakis D. Modeling and Control of Hydrogen Production Systems through Water Electrolysis and Res Power. Proceedings. 2024; 105(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105051
Chicago/Turabian StyleProvatas, Vasileios, Stavros Dapontis, Michalis Konsolakis, and Dimitris Ipsakis. 2024. "Modeling and Control of Hydrogen Production Systems through Water Electrolysis and Res Power" Proceedings 105, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105051
