Next Article in Journal
Equivalent Circuit Model of an Optomechanical MEMS Electric Field Strength Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Si-Based Waveguides for Evanescent-Field Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds †

1
Applied Sensor Science Unit, IFM, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
2
Plasma & Coatings Physics Division, IFM, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
3
Semiconductor Materials Division, IFM, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
4
Division of Molecular Surface Physics & Nanoscience, IFM, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
5
Lab for Measurement Technology, Department of Systems Engineering, Saarland University, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 985; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130985
Published: 3 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
It has been found that two-dimensional materials, such as graphene, can be used as remarkable gas detection platforms as even minimal chemical interactions can lead to distinct changes in electrical conductivity. In this work, epitaxially grown graphene was decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles for sensor performance tuning. This hybrid surface was used as a sensing layer to detect formaldehyde and benzene at concentrations of relevance in air quality monitoring (low parts per billion). Moreover, the time constants could be drastically reduced using a derivative sensor signal readout, allowing detection at the sampling rates desired for air quality monitoring applications.

1. Introduction

Several toxic air pollutants in more than 80% of the urban areas where air pollution is, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), monitored exceeds the WHO recommended safe exposure levels. Poor air quality has been associated with several negative health aspects ranging from less severe conditions such as skin and eye irritation, to more acute respiratory problems, cancer, or death. Air pollution has been estimated to cause 4.3 million annual deaths and to financially burden the European region by about 1.6 trillion US dollars per year [1,2].
Air quality monitoring (AQM) and control using extremely sensitive sensors is crucial from the viewpoint of preventing further deaths and diseases correlated with toxic air substances. However, commercial sensors/instruments available today are either large, expensive, and complex or small but limited by poor selectivity, sensitivity, and a slow sampling rate [3]. In addition, there are no commercially available sensors with sufficient sensitivity to monitor several carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as formaldehyde and benzene, at levels of relevance to human health.
Using the unique properties of graphene as a transducer allows fabrication of sensor devices that can be used for gas detection where low concentrations can be detected, including air quality control for human health. Besides a high sensitivity, also interaction with specific target analytes and a good selectivity must be addressed to get a useful sensor device. It has already been shown that decoration of the graphene surface with metal/oxide nanoparticles can lead to a higher sensitivity and selectivity towards certain gases, e.g., nitrogen dioxide, benzene and formaldehyde [4,5]. Using a “soft” decoration approach, the surface chemistry of the sensing layer could be modified without changing the transducer’s electronic properties. So far, these sensors were able to detect the mentioned gases down to tens of parts per billion (ppb), but not reliably lower. We demonstrate how it is possible to detect even single ppb concentrations and we further introduce a data evaluation approach allowing fast response times to meet the criteria for AQM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sensing Layer Preparation

The graphene was grown epitaxially on silicon carbide (SiC) through a sublimation process were an on-axis, semi-insulating (0001) 4H-SiC substrate is used for the formation of graphene in Ar at a temperature of 2000 °C and at a pressure of 1 bar [6]. The method allows highly homogenous growth of monolayer graphene and requires no further transfer to another insulator. Hollow cathode pulsed plasma sputtering [7] was used to functionalize the graphene surface with iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles.

2.2. Characterization Techniques

Before and after the deposition of nanoparticles, a series of characterization measurements were conducted to see if any damage of the graphene surface occurred during the deposition. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (Quadrexed Dimension 3100) with a Nanoscope IVa controller was used in tapping mode to obtain topography images of the sensing layers. The measurements were performed using Si tips (PPP-NCHR-50 from Nanosensors) with a tip radius of curvature <7 nm. A micro Raman setup was used to perform Raman spectroscopy and reflectance measurements. A CCD camera coupled to a monochromator (HR460) was used along with a 100× magnification objective which was excited at 532 nm using a solid-state laser with a power of 17 mW focused to a spot with diameter ~0.9 µm on the sample, and a system spectral resolution of approximately 5 cm−1. The Raman spectra of Si-face graphene were obtained by subtracting a reference Raman spectrum of 4H-SiC (0001). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies using a Microlab 310-F spectrometer were performed to investigate possible alterations made to the sample after deposition of nanoparticles and to establish if Fe3O4 was present on the surface.

2.3. Sensor Device Fabrication

As a first step, Ti/Au (2/200 nm) contact pads were thermally evaporated onto the EG/SiC before functionalization. The contacts have a size of 1 mm × 1 mm with a distance of 1 mm in between them. The sensor chip and a Pt-100 resistance thermometer were glued (Aremco Ceramabond 571) onto a ceramic heater (Heraeus Sensor-Nite GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany) to enable a controlled temperature loop and welded to a 16 pin TO8 header. This device was mounted on top of a TO8-socket and connected to its pins using gold-wire bonding and silver glue (Epotek E3081). The final sensor is placed in a flow chamber connected to a gas mixing setup. A Keithley 2601B SourceMeter in two-wire mode is used to measure the resistance between the contacts during gas exposure. The total gas flow was held constant at 100 mL/min and a dry mixture of 80% N2 and 20% O2 was used as purging and carrier gas.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Structural Characterization

Figure 1 shows AFM graphs of the graphene sensor surface before (a) and after (b) the decoration with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Neglecting the characteristic steps corresponding to the SiC step bunching, the as-grown graphene surface in Figure 1a shows almost no roughness. The particle coverage is about 60% and single particles have an average diameter of about 70 nm. Raman spectroscopy confirms structural integrity of the graphene surface also after the decoration [5]. XPS shows additionally to the integrity of graphene the presence of iron oxide on top of the sensor surface (not shown here).

3.2. Gas Measurements

After the successful decoration of the graphene surface with Fe3O4 nanoparticles, gas measurements were performed. Figure 2a shows how the resistance of the sensor changes with the exposure towards formaldehyde. The sensor was exposed towards formaldehyde and benzene at 150 °C operating temperature in a dry background using concentrations ranging from 5 parts per million (ppm) to 1 ppb. It has already been shown in an earlier work [5] that Fe3O4 nanoparticle decorated graphene sensors can be used for formaldehyde and benzene detection, but not over such a large range and down to a single ppb. The response is defined as Proceedings 02 00985 i001, where R is the saturate resistance signal and R0 corresponds to the baseline resistance before the gas exposure. The relative response for different concentrations of benzene and formaldehyde is shown in Figure 2b. A distinct response for both gases over the whole range can clearly be observed. Moreover, the safety limit for formaldehyde (~80 ppb) can easily be reached and also benzene (no safety level reported) can be quantitatively measured down to a single ppb. The relative responses towards 1 ppb formaldehyde and benzene are about 0.04% and 0.02%, respectively.
Besides a very good sensitivity, also time constants of these measurements need to be addressed. For an application in indoor air monitoring, the time constants for the sensor should be in the range of half a minute to several minutes, depending on the application. However, as shown in Figure 2a, even an exposure towards the gas over 30 min does not lead to a saturated sensor response. Using the time it takes for the first order time derivative of the sensor signal to reach its maximum for each exposure instead, the time constant can be decreased down to around 50 s. This is exemplarily shown for the first two exposures in the inset in Figure 2a.

4. Conclusions

Benzene and Formaldehyde sensing properties were investigated using epitaxially grown graphene on silicon carbide decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. We could verify the decoration and the integrity of the graphene surface using AFM, Raman spectroscopy and XPS. With this sensor platform, concentrations down to a single ppb of toxic VOCs could be quantitatively measured, which makes it very promising for air quality monitoring. Moreover, the derivative signal readout decreases the time constants down to a speed that is suitable for AQM.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Swedish Foundation for Strategic research (SSF) for financial support through the grants GMT14-0077 and RMA15-024, the Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linköping University through Faculty Grant SFO- Mat-LiU # 2009-00971 and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through grant KAW14.0276. This work has been supported by The Centre in Nano science and technology (CeNano) through the project “Graphene- nanoparticle hybrid gas sensor”. The research part in Germany was financed by a Hans Werthén Foundation grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organisation. Atlas on Children’s Health and the Environment; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 9789241511773. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organisation. Economic Cost of the Health Impact of Air Pollution in Europe: Clean Air, Health and Wealth; World Health Organisation: Copenhagen, Danmark, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Szulczyński, B.; Gębicki, J. Currently Commercially Available Chemical Sensors Employed for Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Outdoor and Indoor Air. Environments 2017, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eriksson, J.; Puglisi, D.; Strandqvist, C.; Gunnarsson, R.; Ekeroth, S. Modified Epitaxial Graphene on SiC for Extremely Sensitive and Selective Gas Sensors. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 858, 1145–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodner, M.; Bahonjic, J.; Mathisen, M.; Gunnarsson, R.; Ekeroth, S.; Helmersson, U.; Ivanov, I.G.; Yakimova, R.; Eriksson, J. Performance tuning of gas sensors based on epitaxial graphene on silicon carbide. Mater. Des. 2018, 153, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yakimova, R.; Virojanadara, C.; Gogova, D.; Syväjärvi, M.; Siche, D.; Larsson, K.; Johansson, L. Analysis of the Formation Conditions for Large Area Epitaxial Graphene on SiC Substrates. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 645–648, 565–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pilch, I.; Söderström, D.; Hasan, M.I.; Helmersson, U.; Brenning, N. Fast growth of nanoparticles in a hollow cathode plasma through orbit motion limited ion collection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 193108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. AFM image of the graphene sensor surface before (a) and after (b) decoration with iron oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 1. AFM image of the graphene sensor surface before (a) and after (b) decoration with iron oxide nanoparticles.
Proceedings 02 00985 g001
Figure 2. (a) Sensor behavior exemplarily shown for the first four exposures (5 ppm–0.1 ppm) towards formaldehyde at 150 °C in dry air with the smoothened derivative signal as inset and (b) relative sensor response towards different concentrations of formaldehyde and benzene.
Figure 2. (a) Sensor behavior exemplarily shown for the first four exposures (5 ppm–0.1 ppm) towards formaldehyde at 150 °C in dry air with the smoothened derivative signal as inset and (b) relative sensor response towards different concentrations of formaldehyde and benzene.
Proceedings 02 00985 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodner, M.; Puglisi, D.; Ekeroth, S.; Helmersson, U.; Ivanov, I.G.; Yakimova, R.; Uvdal, K.; Schütze, A.; Eriksson, J. Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds. Proceedings 2018, 2, 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130985

AMA Style

Rodner M, Puglisi D, Ekeroth S, Helmersson U, Ivanov IG, Yakimova R, Uvdal K, Schütze A, Eriksson J. Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):985. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130985

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodner, Marius, Donatella Puglisi, Sebastian Ekeroth, Ulf Helmersson, Ivan G. Ivanov, Rositsa Yakimova, Kajsa Uvdal, Andreas Schütze, and Jens Eriksson. 2018. "Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130985

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop