Next Article in Journal
Research on the Inhibitory Effect of Hydrated Phase Change Materials on Spontaneous Combustion in Coal
Next Article in Special Issue
After the Greenfire Revolution: Reimagining Collective Identities of the Future Wildland Fire Workforce in a Paradigm Shift for Ecological Fire Management
Previous Article in Journal
FFYOLO: A Lightweight Forest Fire Detection Model Based on YOLOv8
Previous Article in Special Issue
Social Inequity and Wildfire Response: Identifying Gaps and Interventions in Ventura County, California
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Decolonising Fire Science by Reexamining Fire Management across Contested Landscapes: A Workshop Approach

by Abigail Rose Croker 1,2,3,*, Adriana E. S. Ford 2,4,5, Yiannis Kountouris 1,2, Jayalaxshmi Mistry 2,6, Amos Chege Muthiuru 2,5, Cathy Smith 2,6, Elijah Praise 7, David Chiawo 8 and Veronica Muniu 8
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 5:
Submission received: 16 January 2024 / Revised: 13 March 2024 / Accepted: 14 March 2024 / Published: 16 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining the Future of Living and Working with Fire)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Overall the research, use of workshops (Kenya) and connection to researchers (London) is novel and a good approach to make the journal audience more aware of. In being very Kenya focused, there could be some references to similar works/research approaches globally: Aboriginal Australia comes to mind. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Many thanks,

Abigail Croker, on behalf of the authorship team. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I suggest to reject this manuscript due to the following reasons:

1. It is just a report, which has no scientificity.

2. Throughout the whole manuscript, I cannot find any contribution for the current fire prevention.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

It is readable.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Many thanks,

Abigail Croker, on behalf of the authorship team. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I applaud the authors for putting this manuscript together.  This is very well-written and described.  You have provided much for thought and discussion. Best wishes with your future efforts.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Many thanks,

Abigail Croker, on behalf of the authorship team. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper is well written. Please create a separate 'limitation' section where you include the limitations of this research in detail and the scope of future work.

1.     Please explain more about the boarder aspect of this research in the conclusion. How can this approach be used in other parts of the world?

1.       Try to provide the novelty of this research at the end of the introduction and conclusion.

    Please include examples and references from different parts of the globe.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Many thanks,

Abigail Croker, on behalf of the authorship team. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 5 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The case report titled “Decolonising Fire Science: Fire Management Across Contested Landscapes. A Workshop Report Summary” tells the experience of a workshop carried out in Nairobi with Kenyan stakeholders and coordinated by British researchers. At the same time, a workshop was occurring in London with researchers. Both groups connected and virtually interacted. The main objective of the Workshop was to establish an inclusive working fire network. The context and methodology for doing this workshop are well-argued and consistent. The article is clear and complete. It is interesting to read about this kind of workshop. I could find some similarities and also some differences with what is happening with fire where I live and work. So, I consider that showing the results of these experiences through scientific journals is useful for researchers to present and discuss current problems including the perspective of local people, as long as these results are not stopped from also being presented in other media that involve the workshop participants and policy-makers.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Many thanks,

Abigail Croker, on behalf of the authorship team. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop