Next Article in Journal
Perceptions of Prescribed Fire Among Ranchers near Northern US National Grasslands
Previous Article in Journal
Decision Science for Multi-Objective Fuel Management: Integrating Fire Risk Reduction and Biodiversity Conservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modelling Relative Fire Sensitivity for Geodiversity Elements

by
Ruby O. Hoyland
* and
Melinda T. McHenry
School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Sandy Bay, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fire 2025, 8(3), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030101
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 24 February 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 28 February 2025

Abstract

The integration of geodiversity elements and contexts into fire management frameworks remains limited due to a lack of actionable tools for assessing geosite sensitivity. This study addresses this gap by developing and testing a mechanistic model to evaluate soil and lithological fire sensitivity, using a geodiversity database of Tasmanian geosites at various temperature thresholds. Initial results indicate the utility of the approach to distinguish between sensitive and robust geosites, providing a simple delineation between the relative sensitivities of in situ elements. A subsequent iterative approach applied modelled outputs to an existing geosite database, giving coarse indicators of sites with a propensity to be modified by fire. With static inventory, this approach allows decision-makers to develop new risk parameters for the management of burns and wildfires. Geographically complex environments have led to misalignments between geosite boundaries and broader processes, data inaccessibility for remote or offshore sites, and fire as both a destructive and formative agent; these must all be resolved. Future work should consider the necessity of incorporating values, recovery trajectories, and hydrological processes into fire sensitivity assessments. The study concludes with recommendations for refining the model to enhance its utility for fire managers, ultimately contributing to the integration of geodiversity into fire management strategies and geoconservation planning.
Keywords: geoheritage; geosite; geoconservation; vulnerability; sensitivity; risk; hazard; wildfire; protected areas; environmental impact assessment; Tasmania geoheritage; geosite; geoconservation; vulnerability; sensitivity; risk; hazard; wildfire; protected areas; environmental impact assessment; Tasmania

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoyland, R.O.; McHenry, M.T. Modelling Relative Fire Sensitivity for Geodiversity Elements. Fire 2025, 8, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030101

AMA Style

Hoyland RO, McHenry MT. Modelling Relative Fire Sensitivity for Geodiversity Elements. Fire. 2025; 8(3):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoyland, Ruby O., and Melinda T. McHenry. 2025. "Modelling Relative Fire Sensitivity for Geodiversity Elements" Fire 8, no. 3: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030101

APA Style

Hoyland, R. O., & McHenry, M. T. (2025). Modelling Relative Fire Sensitivity for Geodiversity Elements. Fire, 8(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8030101

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop