Next Article in Journal
Impact of Crop Residue, Nutrients, and Soil Moisture on Methane Emissions from Soil under Long-Term Conservation Tillage
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Solution Properties of Tropical Soils and Brachiaria Growth as Affected by Humic Acid Concentration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Date Palm Residues to Improve Soil Properties: The Case of Compost and Biochar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of As-Resistant Bacterial Strains from the Bulk Soil and the Rhizosphere of Mycorrhizal Pteris vittata Cultivated in an Industrial Multi-Polluted Site

1
Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
2
Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile e la Transizione Ecologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soil Syst. 2024, 8(3), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8030087
Submission received: 22 April 2024 / Revised: 26 July 2024 / Accepted: 31 July 2024 / Published: 3 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Bioremediation)

Abstract

:
Arsenic (As) contamination poses significant environmental and health concerns globally, particularly in regions with high exposure levels due to anthropogenic activities. As phytoremediation, particularly through the hyperaccumulator fern Pteris vittata, offers a promising approach to mitigate arsenic pollution. Bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi colonizing P. vittata roots are involved in As metabolism and resistance and plant growth promotion under stressful conditions. A total of 45 bacterial strains were isolated from bulk soil and the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata growing in an industrial As-polluted site. Bacteria were characterized by their plant-beneficial traits, tolerance to sodium arsenate and arsenite, and the occurrence of As-resistant genes. This study highlights differences between the culturable fraction of the microbiota associated with the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata plants and the bulk soil. Moreover, several strains showing arsenate tolerance up to 600 mM were isolated. All the bacterial strains possessed arsC genes, and about 70% of them showed arrA genes involved in the anaerobic arsenate respiration pathway. The possible exploitation of such bacterial strains in strategies devoted to the assisted phytoremediation of arsenic highlights the importance of such a study in order to develop effective in situ phytoremediation strategies.

1. Introduction

Arsenic (As) is widely distributed throughout environmental components, such as air, water and soil, with a mean concentration of 3 mg kg−1 As and is ranked 20th in the Earth’s crust [1]. In soil, the natural As content ranges from 0.2 to about 40 mg kg−1 [2]; in polluted sites, such as copper-smelting plants and pesticide-contaminated agricultural soils, its concentration can reach 100–2500 mg kg−1 (the World Health Organization [WHO], 2000).
Arsenic can also be derived from natural processes and can be released by rock weathering, volcanic emissions and discharges from hot springs [3]. However, the amount of As introduced into the environment increases through human activities, such as mining, smelting, forest wildfires and the use of pesticides and herbicides [4,5,6]. As a result, in 2017, the US-EPA counted more than 600 As-contaminated sites in the US requiring remediation processes (US-EPA, 2017). Arsenic pollution represents a major issue, especially in Europe, Bangladesh, Taiwan, India, Malaysia, Vietnam, China, Mexico and Pakistan; the worst situation is in South and Southeast Asia, where millions of people are exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water [7,8]. Here, arsenic represents a potential health risk to the environment and human health due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, especially in its inorganic forms. In the environment, arsenate (AsV) and arsenite (AsIII) are the most abundant inorganic forms of As. Both of them show high toxicity in microorganisms, plants and mammals but differ in their availability [9]. In fact, arsenate is characterized by an elevated mobility in the water ecosystem and an important affinity for the sulfhydryl groups that are part of cellular enzymes, thus leading to higher toxicity compared to arsenite. While under anaerobiosis, microorganisms may use arsenate as an electron acceptor during anaerobic respiration, and in an aerobic environment, microorganisms can catalyze the reduction of arsenate to arsenite that is extruded out of the cell through a specific arsenite transporter [10,11]. Therefore, microorganisms that are able to transform arsenate to arsenite play a crucial role in the modulation of As toxicity in the environment.
Although arsenic is toxic for the majority of plant species, hyperaccumulator plants are able to store heavy metals and metalloids up to 1% of their dry weight without showing toxicity-related symptoms [12]. Usually, plants classified as hyperaccumulators uptake arsenate or arsenite and transport them to their aboveground parts, where As is then stored, allowing contaminated soils to be cleaned up and avoiding arsenic accumulation through the food chain [13]. In 2001, the first As hyperaccumulator, the Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata), with the capability to accumulate up to 2–3% of As in its fronds and tolerate arsenic concentrations of up to 1500 ppm, was discovered [14]. Since then, the mechanisms by which P. vittata can tolerate, detoxify and accumulate arsenic have been widely analyzed and well characterized [15,16,17,18,19]. Amongst plant-beneficial microorganisms, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can establish symbiosis with most terrestrial plants, including ferns, such as P. vittata, leading to increased plant biomass and plant nutrition improvement, modulating arsenate transfer to the fronds and enhancing plant tolerance to stresses [20,21,22,23,24]. The increased arsenic accumulation in the fronds observed in mycorrhizal P. vittata is possibly related to the upregulation of a putative arsenic transporter, PgPOR29, following plant inoculation with AMF [18].
In this context, exploring the cultivable fraction of this rhizosphere microbiota is crucial, as these bacteria hold promise for application in phytoremediation technologies, further underlining the importance of studying the entire rhizosphere ecosystem for advancing sustainable bioremediation strategies. The role of bacteria colonizing the roots of this fern in supporting plant growth in such a hostile environment and As metabolism has been less investigated. A quick search of the literature database (WoS) performed in April 2024 by cross-referencing the keywords Pteris vittata AND bacteria resulted in 119 papers since 2006, thus demonstrating that there is still a need for new information in this context. Moreover, to our knowledge, no published paper focused on the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata growing in a multi-metal contaminated industrial site. The first paper on this topic was published in 2010 by the group of Lena Ma, who isolated and identified 20 bacterial strains from the rhizosphere of P. vittata tolerating 400 mmol/L of arsenate and metabolizing it to arsenite in a broth medium [23]. The occurrence of bacterial endophytes has also been explored [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Most of the papers reporting the efficacy of rhizospheric or endophytic bacterial strains in plant growth promotion or metabolizing arsenic were performed under controlled conditions in pot experiments on As-amended soils [27,28,31,32]. In contrast, only a very low number of articles deal with experiments performed directly in polluted sites [29,33,34].
During 2011–2014, we participated in a project focused on the soil remediation of an industrial site (at that time, Solvay Solexis S.p.a.) located in the north-west of Italy, characterized by a multiplicity of mainly inorganic pollutants, including arsenic. Two experimental fields (10 × 10 m and 60 × 1.5 m) were set up with 231 and 357 plants of mycorrhizal P. vittata, respectively. The As-remediation efficiency of these mycorrhizal P. vittata was evaluated after three years of growth in this area and well described by Cantamessa et al. [24]. In order to select microorganisms able to improve arsenic phytoremediation by P. vittata, we isolated, identified and characterized their plant-beneficial physiological features (phosphate solubilization, siderophore release and auxin production), the traits involved in arsenic metabolism and the bacterial strains living in the bulk soil and the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata cultivated for three years in this multi-polluted industrial site.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Sampling

The map of the industrial site (44°53′15″ N 8°40′07″ E) and the sampling point are reported in Figure 1.
Bulk soil and the soil associated with the roots of mycorrhizal P. vittata were collected at a depth of 30 cm (topsoil) after removing the surface layer (3.0–5.0 cm). Three soil cores (about 1 kg) were taken in the proximity of five ferns and from five points in the unplanted soil. The roots entrapped in the soil cores collected 3 cm close to the ferns were assessed for mycorrhizal colonization. Briefly, the roots were fixed in 70% ethanol and cut into 1 cm-long pieces. The roots were then cleared with 10% KOH for 45 min at 60 °C, stained with 1% methyl blue in lactic acid and mounted on a slide. The evaluation of mycorrhizal colonization was measured, as described in 1986 by Trouvelot et al. [35], and plants reaching up to 50% were considered for the sampling of the mycorrhizosphere soil. The soil adhering to these roots was removed using sterile gloves. As recommended by the Italian law GU 179/2002, for soil microbiological characterization analysis, the three subsamples of mycorrhizosphere or bulk soil were pooled to obtain homogeneous samples. The soil samples were then immediately processed in the laboratory for bacterial isolation. The workflow is represented in Figure 2.

2.2. Isolation and Extraction of Culturable Bacteria

The isolation of culturable bacterial strains from the mycorrhizosphere and bulk soil was performed, as reported by Novello et al. (2023) [36]. Briefly, ten grams of fresh soil were added to 90 mL of MgSO4-7H2O (0.1 M, Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy), shaken at room temperature at 180 rpm for 1 h and allowed to sediment for 30 min. Serial dilutions (until 10−4) were performed in magnesium sulfate buffer, and 100 μL of each suspension was distributed on 10% Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Sigma-Aldrich) with 100 μg mL−1 of cycloheximide added as an antifungal agent (Sigma-Aldrich). Sodium arsenate (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) was also added to half of the plates. The bacterial density was recorded after 2 and 7 days of incubation at 28 °C and expressed as log CFU g−1 of dry soil. Twenty to thirty colonies from a representative dilution were selected and isolated on TSA plates. Cultures of bacterial cells, grown in TSB (Biolife, Monza, Italy), were stored in 50% glycerol at −80 °C. All isolated strains were subjected to Gram staining and a description of the colony morphology with a stereomicroscope.
Data regarding bacterial densities were statistically compared by one-way ANOVA using StatView Software, ver. 4.5 (Abacus Concepts; Berkeley, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant for p-values < 0.05.

2.3. Identification of Bacterial Strains

The identification of bacterial strains was conducted using MALDI (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization) and TOF-TOF (UltrafleXtreme, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) mass spectrometry, following the procedure outlined by Novello et al. (2023) [36]. A freshly cultured bacterial colony on TSA was applied in triplicate onto an MTP 384 target plate (Bruker Daltonics, Milan, Italy). Initially, the spot was treated with 70% formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) and subsequently with alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) (Bruker, Milan, Italy). The target plate was allowed to air-dry at room temperature until the sample crystallized. The acquired mass spectra for each bacterial strain were subjected to analysis by Biotyper software v.20 (Bruker Daltonics, Milan, Italy) and referred to standard matching.

2.4. Exploring Plant-Beneficial Physiological Traits and Temperature Test

The bacterial strains were characterized for the physiological activities underlying their plant growth-promoting effect (such as phosphate solubilization, IAA synthesis and siderophore production) and were tested for their ability to grow at different temperatures (4, 28, 37 and 42 °C) [36].
Their ability to solubilize phosphate was evaluated by spotting the isolates in the center of plates containing two growth media, one containing tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and another one containing dicalcium phosphate (DCP). Plates were incubated for 15 days at 28 °C, and phosphate solubilization was highlighted with colony growth for the TCP plates and colony growth with a clarification halo for the DCP plates.
The synthesis and production of IAA (indole-3 acetic acid) were evaluated on 10% TSA plates containing 5 mM of tryptophan (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), as reported by De Brito Alvarez et al. (1995) [37]. Single colonies were inoculated in the center of three plates, covered with nitrocellulose disks and incubated at 28 °C for 72 h. At the end of the incubation, the disks were removed and reacted with Salkowski’s reagent (0.5 M of FeCl3 in 35% HClO4) for 1–3 h. The presence of a red/pink halo indicated the synthesis of IAA.
For the siderophore release assessment, three Petri dishes containing the universal Chrome Azurol S (CAS) medium were inoculated in the center with each bacterial strain and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days [38]. The production of siderophores was evidenced by the presence of an orange halo around the colony and reported as the ratio between the diameter of the halo and that of the colony.
A temperature test was performed in order to evaluate the growth range of the bacterial isolates. TSA plates were spotted with a colony of each bacterial strain and incubated at four different temperatures for 24–48 h.

2.5. Assessment of Arsenate and Arsenite Effect by Minimal Inhibitory Concentration

The bacterial tolerance to arsenate and arsenite was assessed by determining the MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) using the microdilution method. Sodium arsenate (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) and sodium arsenite (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in TSB to obtain a final starting concentration of 600 mM and 4 mM in the plates, respectively. The assay was performed in 96-well plates. The starting solution was then serially diluted (2:1) to obtain a range from 600 mM to 0.58 mM for arsenate and from 4 mM to 0.007 mM for arsenite. A fresh culture of each bacterium was diluted in MgSO4 buffer (0.1 M) up to a concentration of 108 CFU/mL, then diluted in TSB to a final concentration of 105 CFU/mL. This final suspension was added to each well. A positive control, represented by TSB with a bacteria inoculum, and a negative control, containing TSB with arsenate and arsenite, were carried out. The 96-well plates were incubated at 28 °C for 24/48 h and considered positive when turbidity was visible. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.6. Arsenate Reductase and Arsenate Respiratory Reductase Gene PCR Amplifications

The arsC (arsenate reductase) and arrA (arsenate respiratory reductase) genes were targeted using six and three primer sets, respectively, as shown in Table 1 and previously described by Escudero et al. (2013) [39]. Two of the six primer sets amplify glutaredoxin-dependent arsC, while the other four amplify thyroxine-dependent arsC.
All PCR reactions were prepared as follows: Genomic DNA at different dilutions (1:1, 1:10 and 1:50) was used for gene amplifications. The reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 μL containing 2 μL of 10× PCR buffer (containing 15 mM of MgCl2) (Finnzymes, Woburn, MA Finland); 500 μM of dNTPs (125 μM of each dNTP); 500 nM of each primer; and 0.02 U μL−1 of Taq DNA polymerase (Finnzymes). In the amlt-42-F/amlt-376-R/smrc-42-F/smrc-376-R primer mix, 250 nM of each primer was used. Five ml of diluted or undiluted genomic DNA wereas added to 15 mL of the PCR mix, and the amplifications were performed in a thermal cycler (Techne, Bibby Scientific, Segrate, Milan, Italy). The PCR primer set programs are listed in Table 2. In order to enhance the efficiency of the amplification and increase the amount of DNA for the arsenate respiratory reductase arrA gene, a hemi-nested PCR was carried out using the primer pairs AS1R and AS1R for the first amplification step and AS2F and AS1R for the second one. The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel in TAE buffer, and DNA was visualized under UV light after being stained with ethidium bromide.

3. Results

3.1. Quantification of Culturable Bacteria

The bacterial density of the culturable fraction isolated from the contaminated area was evaluated as log CFU g−1 of dry soil. The cultivable bacterial density in the mycorrhizosphere was higher than that recorded in the bulk soil (PTV vs. BS p = 0.02). In detail, the bacterial density was 4.59 in PTV (total bacteria from the mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata), 4.50 in PTV-As (As-tolerant bacteria from the mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata) and 4.14 in BS (total bacteria from the bulk soil) and BS-As (As-tolerant bacteria from the bulk soil). The fraction of Gram-positive bacteria was 60% in BS, 30% in Bs-As, 73% in PTV and 67% in PTV-As. Consequently, the highest amount of Gram-negative isolates was found in the BS-As sample (70%). In all the samples, a prevalence of r-strategist, fast-growing strains was observed: 79.49% in PTV, 81.25% in PTV-As and 78.57% in BS and BS-As.

3.2. Identification of Bacterial Strains

A total of 45 strains were selected, identified, characterized by their physiological traits and subjected to molecular analysis in order to identify possible genes involved in As tolerance. Twenty colonies were isolated from the P. vittata mycorrhizosphere: eleven were selected from a culture medium without arsenic and nine from the same medium with added sodium arsenate. Another 25 colonies were selected from the bulk soil: 15 strains were isolated on a culture medium without arsenic and 10 from the same medium with added sodium arsenate (Table 3).
The most representative genus was Bacillus, followed by Pseudomonas, Brevundimonas and Janibacter (31%, 27%, 11% and 9% of the total, respectively). The Bacillus genus was more frequent in the P. vittata mycorrhizosphere (45%) than in the bulk soil (20%). An opposite situation was observed for the Pseudomonas genus, which was dominant in the bulk soil (48%) and less spread in the mycorrhizosphere (5%). Bacteria belonging to the Arthrobacter genus (four strains, with 16% of the strains isolated from BS and BS-As) occurred only in the bulk soil (Table 3 and Figure 3A,B). Finally, the identification reveals the presence of only one isolate belonging to the Microbacterium, Pedobacter, Micrococcus, Pseudoarthrobacter and Oerskovia genera, representing 2% of the total identified isolates (Table 3).

3.3. Characterization of Physiological Traits and Temperature Test

All the strains (45 bacterial strains) were tested for their ability to solubilize phosphate, produce auxins and synthesize siderophores. No phosphate-solubilizing bacteria were found either in the mycorrhizosphere soil or the bulk soil.
The results (Table 3) show that 40% (18 out of 45 strains) of the selected bacteria were able to produce siderophores. In detail, four of them were found in PTV-As and BS-As, three in the mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata (PTV) and seven in the bulk soil (BS). Auxin synthesis was detected in 26% of the strains (12 out of 45). Only 1 out of 12 were isolated from PTV, 4 from PTV-As, 4 from BS and 3 from BS-As. Bacteria able to synthesize siderophores were more abundant than IAA-producing bacteria: the capability to release iron-chelating molecules was more frequent in the bulk soil than in the mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata (44% vs. 35%). Only 6 strains out of 45, namely, Bacillus megaterium PTV15, Bacillus sp. PTV-As8, Bacillus pumilus PTV-As23, Pseudomonas marginalis BS10, Pseudomonas thivervalensis BS19 and P. marginalis BS-As19 were able to synthesize both IAA and siderophores. Finally, the temperature range for growth was assessed for each bacterial strain. All tested bacteria were able to grow at 28 °C, 71% (32 out of 45 strains) at 4 °C, 84% (38 out of 45) at 37 °C and only 33% (15 out of 45) at 42 °C. While all PTV and PTV-As isolated strains were able to grow at 37 °C, this capability was recorded in only 18 out of 25 (72%) of the strains isolated from the bulk soil.

3.4. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of Arsenate and Arsenite

All the bacterial strains tolerated concentrations higher than 4 mM of sodium arsenite. Only one strain (BS1, identified as Arthrobacter sp.) was tolerant to more than 600 mM of sodium arsenate. For all other strains, the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values of sodium arsenate were as follows: 15 strains (33%) were tolerant up to 600 mM, 15 strains (33%) up to 300 mM, 10 strains (22%) up to 150 mM and 3 strains (6%) up to 75 mM. The MIC values of sodium arsenite and sodium arsenate for all the selected strains are reported in Table 4.

3.5. Arsenate Reductase and Arsenate Respiratory Pathways

The presence of arsC and arrA genes in the selected bacterial strains was determined by PCR and is reported in Table 5. Glutareroxin-dependent arsC genes were absent in all the bacterial isolates, while thyrodoxin-dependent arsC genes were detected in all the strains. In particular, all bacteria except PTV-As29, BS7, BS18, BS19, BS-As7, BS-As14 BS-As19 and BS-As22 were positive to primer set ArsC/ArsC 4R. The strain PTV-As29 was positive to the primer sets ArsC 6F/ArsC 6R2 and ArsCGP-Fw/ArsCGP-Rv. The isolates BS7, BS18, BS19, BS-As7 and BSAs14 were positive to the primer set ArsC 6F/ArsC 6R2, and BS-As19 and BS-As22 were positive to the primer sets ArsC 6F/ArsC 6R2 and ArsC 5F/ArsC 5R. All bacteria except PTV7, PTV9, PTV15, PTV18, PTV25, PTV28, PTV30, BS1, BS3, BS8, BS11, BS12, BS14, BS15, BS-As11 and BS-As12 had arsenate respiratory reductase genes.

4. Discussion

Since its discovery, credited to researchers from the University of Florida, particularly Dr. Lena Q. Ma and her colleagues in the early 2000s, the Chinese brake fern Pteris vittata is well known for its remarkable arsenic accumulation capabilities without suffering significant damage [14,40]. Its roots have the capacity to actively absorb arsenic from the surrounding soil, transporting it to the plant’s tissues through its vascular system to the fronds, which are mostly responsible for the accumulation of the metalloid (75–99%). The As-tolerance of this fern reaches 4000 ppm [14]. Moreover, this fern can be exploited in sites characterized by multi-metal contamination due to its capability to grow in the presence of other toxic metals [41,42].
The rhizosphere, the soil region influenced by a plant’s root system [43], harbors a diverse microbial community that plays a crucial role in plant health, productivity and soil ecology [44]. The characterization of the microbiota inhabiting the rhizosphere of an As-hyperaccumulating plant holds profound significance. In fact, both the epiphytic and endophytic microorganisms associated with P. vittata are necessarily tolerant to high metal or metalloid levels, and this specific trait can be important for host survival under stressful conditions [27]. Moreover, in phytoremediation trials, the natural occurrence or the artificial inoculation of plants with AMF can positively affect plant survival and development by mitigating the toxic effects of heavy metals and As or influencing their uptake, accumulation and translocation [27,28,29,31,32,33,34,45]. By harnessing the potential of rhizospheric microorganisms, P. vittata can efficiently thrive and hyperaccumulate arsenic and other toxic metals, thereby aiding in soil detoxification. This symbiotic association not only enhances arsenic tolerance in P. vittata but also amplifies its phytoremediation efficacy.
The bacterial density both in the soil and the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata was quite low and did not overcome 4 × 104 CFU g−1 of dry soil (log10 CFU g−1 of dry soil = 4.60) in all the samples. This is consistent with the chemical analysis of the soils reported by Cantamessa et al. [24], showing multi-metal contamination in this industrial site, with As, Sb and Se levels higher than the permissible limits established by the Italian law (Legislative Decree 152/06) for industrial sites. In detail, the As level was three times the value indicated in the legislative Decree 152/06 (170 mg kg−1 vs. 50 mg kg−1). As a direct consequence of the toxicity of these elements, the number of bacterial strains isolated, identified and characterized is not so high. High levels of arsenic in the environment may exert a strong selective pressure leading to a reduction in bacteria density and biodiversity [46], followed by the development of a few dominant bacterial species that have become well-adapted to highly arsenic-polluted soil. Moreover, no significant differences were found between the bacterial density recorded in the bulk soil and the rhizosphere, as well as in the presence or absence of As in the medium. This demonstrates that both the plant presence and As in the culture medium did not affect the culturable bacterial density.
Fourteen out of the forty-five isolated bacteria belonged to the genus Bacillus (31.1% of the total amount), which was the most representative, especially in the mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata, where its frequency reached 50%. In fact, the genus Bacillus is widely spread in the environment, especially in the soil, and strains belonging to this phylogenetic group frequently show As resistance mainly through arsenite methylation and oxidation [47]. In contrast, the Pseudomonas genus was the most representative in the bulk soil (48%) and was rarely found in the fern mycorrhizosphere. Only 1 isolate out of 20 identified as belonging to pseudomonads was found to be associated with the fern root, thus suggesting that this genus is negatively selected by the plant. This is in contrast with the literature reporting the genus Pseudomonas as dominant in the rhizosphere and internal root tissues of P. vittata [25,29,31,48]. While the role of the root exudates cannot be ruled out, the higher concentration of As around the root due to the mobilization of the metalloid by the fern may inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas strains, which were demonstrated to have a lower tolerance to arsenate compared to Bacillus. In fact, the majority (63.6%) of the Pseudomonad isolates tolerate arsenate up to 150 mM, while 50% of the strains identified as Bacillus tolerate arsenate up to 300 mM. The genus Arthrobacter was only found in the bulk soil samples. Interestingly, three out of four of the isolates belonging to this genus tolerate up to 600 mM of sodium arsenate. Only a few papers are focused on the arsenic tolerance of Arthrobacter strains. The MIC value for arsenate and arsenite in Arthrobacter sp. B6 isolated from the As-contaminated aquifer sediment in China was 150.0 mM and 5.0 mM, respectively [49]. According to Achour et al. (2017) [50], the MIC for arsenate in Arthrobacter sp. was 160 mM. Therefore, the arsenic tolerance shown by the strains isolated in our work is about four times that reported in the literature as typical for the genus. Moreover, all 5 isolates identified as Brevundimonas diminuta (4 out of 20 in the fern mycorrhizosphere and 1 out of 25 in the bulk soil) showed a very high tolerance to arsenate, reaching 600 mM. The genus Brevundimonas has been reported many times as being particularly resistant to As. In their work, Banerjee et al. (2021) [51] isolated the strain Brevundimonas aurantiaca PFAB1 from Panifala hot spring in West Bengal, India, which was tolerant to arsenite up to 90 mM and arsenate up to 310 mM. Similarly, Brevundimonas sp. isolated from the rhizosphere of Oenothera picensis plants growing close to a copper smelter in central Chile demonstrated being able to grow in high amounts of arsenic (As) (6000 mg L−1) thanks to genes related to the ars operon, metal(loid)-resistance-related genes, metal efflux pumps, and detoxifying enzymes [52]. Interestingly, the B. diminuta strain isolated from arsenic-rich soil in the district of Uttar Pradesh (India), inoculated on rice plants exposed to 10 and 50 ppm of As, was able to increase plant biomass and plant tolerance to the metalloid through siderophore synthesis, phosphate solubilization, and auxin and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase production [53].
These data are partly consistent with the literature reporting a wide range of bacterial genera collectively called arsenic-resistant bacteria (ARB), including Acidithiobacillus, Bacillus, Deinococcus, Desulfitobacterium, and Pseudomonas, which use As as an electron donor and acceptor or have the capability to detoxify this metalloid [47]. In addition to their role in As detoxification, these bacterial strains may directly or indirectly promote plant growth through their plant-beneficial features. About 25% of the bacterial strains isolated from the two compartments were able to synthesize IAA. This phytohormone drives the plant growth-stimulating root and xylem development, modulating the formation of lateral and adventitious roots, affecting photosynthesis and enhancing resistance to stressful conditions [54]. Siderophore producers were abundant both in the soil and the mycorrhizosphere but were more represented in the bulk soil than in the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata (44% vs. 35%). It should be taken into account that in addition to their role in iron uptake, siderophores can solubilize As adsorbed on Fe-oxides, releasing As that becomes available for the plant [55,56]. An increase in the P. vittata biomass (+45% compared to uninoculated controls) after inoculation with bacterial strains synthesizing siderophore and IAA, coupled with an enhancement in As removal (from 13 to 35%), was reported by Lampis et al. (2015) [31].
As detoxification in arsenic-tolerant bacteria relies on the ars operons [57] encoding the influx/efflux system. There are two most common types of these operons containing either five (arsRDABC) or three (arsRBC) genes [52]. Among them, ArsC encodes an AsV reductase enzyme reducing AsV (arsenate) to AsIII (arsenite) prior to releasing it from the cell through an efflux pump encoded by arsB. ArsC enzymes belong to two unrelated families: the first one from the R773 plasmid uses glutathione and glutaredoxin as electron sources, and the second one from the pI258 plasmid is based on thioredoxin as an electron source [58]. All the bacterial strains isolated in this work showed thioredoxin-dependent arsenate reductase, while no strains possessed glutathione-dependent arsenate reductase, showing a specific selection process. Moreover, the Trx-reducing system is more efficient than the Grx-reducing system when the As concentrations are moderate or high [39]. Alternatively, AsV reduction occurs in the periplasm through a dissimilatory arsenate reductase, encoded by the arr operon, where AsV accepts a terminal electron and allows the respiration of bacteria under anaerobic conditions [59]. About 70% of the bacteria isolates selected in this work were characterized by the presence of arr genes.
It is well known that ars operons are widely spread in both Bacteria and Archaea species, and they have also been detected in microbes isolated from arsenic-free environments. Surprisingly, it has been stated that ars genes in bacteria are more common than genes for tryptophan synthesis [60], thus reflecting the ubiquitous presence of arsenic in nature. The presence of As-resistant genes on plasmids and transposons represents an opportunity for bacteria to spread these genetic traits, conferring high environmental fitness, by horizontal gene transfer. Finally, 29 out of the 45 strains (64%) showed respiratory arsenate reductase genes (arrA), considered a late evolutionary adaptation to environmental As stress [61]. All these isolates also carried ars genes. The arr operon codes for the heterodimer respiratory arsenate reductase are made up of a large (encoded by arrA) and a small subunit (encoded by arrB) and have only been found in Bacteria and Archaea domains. Bacteria with the arr operon use arsenate as an electron acceptor and reduce it to arsenite with higher toxicity and mobility [62]. A different distribution of arrA gene variants was observed, where 48% of the strains isolated from the bulk soil showed the arrA1 gene, and 65% of the strains isolated from the mycorrhizosphere showed the arrA2 gene. A fraction corresponding to the 20% and 25% of the bacterial strains isolated from the bulk soil and the mycorrhizosphere, respectively, did not show genes involved in the respiratory arsenate reduction pathway. The different distribution of arr genes in the bulk soil and the mycorrhizosphere may be related to the different taxa identified in the two compartments.
Starting from the obtained in vitro data, it is not possible to predict the efficiency of the bacterial strains’ in-plant response. Further studies are still needed to assess the ability of the different bacterial strains tested to implement the plant’s ability to accumulate arsenic. However, all the tested strains, as explained above, tolerate a considerable concentration of arsenite (4 mM), and many of these grow at arsenate concentrations greater than 600 mM. We can, therefore, assume that the strains Arthrobacter sp. BS1 (CAS positive), Arthrobacter sp. BS-As2 (IAA producer), Oerskovia sp. BS-As14 (CAS positive), Brevundimonas diminuta PTV-As5 (IAA producer), B. diminuta PTV-As7 (IAA producer) and Bacillus sp. PTV-As8 (CAS positive and IAA producer) might be good candidates for further studies in plants.
In conclusion, investigating the bacterial communities associated with Pteris vittata in multi-metal contaminated soil can provide valuable insights for the development of more efficient phytoremediation strategies. Understanding how these bacteria interact with plants already colonized by AMF and contribute to metal accumulation and detoxification processes can enhance our ability to optimize phytoremediation efforts in polluted areas. The efficiency of this tripartite interaction (plant/bacteria/mycorrhizal fungi) can be affected by the occurrence of other pollutants, as well as other stressful conditions. In this work, we focused our attention on arsenic as the main pollutant, but other metals, such as antimony and selenium, measured over the permissible limits. It is well known that P. vittata can accumulate not only arsenic but also other inorganic pollutants [42,63]. This ability makes this plant species, along with its associated microbiome, an excellent tool for phytoremediation, particularly in soils contaminated with multiple metals, as in the industrial site considered in this work. The capacity of this fern to absorb various heavy metals and other harmful substances makes it an ideal choice for environmental cleanups, helping to reduce soil contamination and improve the quality of the surrounding environment. Thus, a future focus could involve exploring the possible synergies between different ecosystem components, such as the interactions between the plant, bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi, and their combined impact on the efficiency of metal uptake and detoxification. In this context, it would be important to understand how the presence of multiple contaminants influences these interactions and, consequently, the overall effectiveness of phytoremediation. Moreover, investigating the composition and function of the microbiome in the mycorrhizosphere and their role in facilitating phytoremediation could provide new insights into the mechanisms by which these microbiomes contribute to plant resistance and tolerance to pollutants, thereby offering strategies to further optimize environmental remediation technologies. Despite the importance of understanding rhizosphere microbial dynamics in phytoremediation processes, there is a notable gap in the literature concerning studies specifically targeting the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata. While there are numerous studies on the plant’s phytoremediation potential and its symbiotic relationship with mycorrhizal fungi, the microbial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal plants remained, till now, relatively understudied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B., E.B., S.C. and E.G.; methodology, G.N. and P.C.; software, N.M.; formal analysis, N.M.; investigation, G.N., E.B., D.C. and P.C.; resources, G.B. and G.L.; data curation, N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.G., G.N. and E.B.; writing—review and editing, E.G., G.N., P.C. and E.B.; project administration, G.B. and G.L.; funding acquisition, G.B. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been partially funded by RisPA research centre—a Syensqo—Università del Piemonte Orientale Joint lab.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Graziella Berta, whose contributions and personality continue to inspire and guide our scientific and human behavior. We wish to thank the site owners, who allowed soil harvesting and in-the-field experimentation, Giovanni D’Agostino for his useful suggestions, and Donata Vigani and Giuliano Bonelli for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adriano, D.C. Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986; pp. 46–72. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yan-Chu, H. Arsenic distribution in soils. In Arsenic in the Environment, Part 1: Cycling and Characterization; Nriagu, J.O., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994; pp. 17–49. [Google Scholar]
  3. Masuda, H. Arsenic cycling in the Earth’s crust and hydrosphere: Interaction between naturally occurring arsenic and human activities. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 5, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, F.J.; McGrath, S.P.; Meharg, A.A. Arsenic as a food chain contaminant: Mechanisms of plant uptake and metabolism and mitigation strategies. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 535–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. da Silva, E.B.; Lessl, J.T.; Wilkie, A.C.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.Q. Arsenic removal by As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata from two contaminated soils: A 5-year study. Chemosphere 2018, 206, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Missimer, T.M.; Teaf, C.M.; Beeson, W.T.; Maliva, R.G.; Woolschlager, J.; Covert, D.J. Natural background and anthropogenic arsenic enrichment in Florida soils, surface water, and groundwater: A Review with a Discussion on Public Health Risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbas, G.; Murtaza, B.; Bibi, I.; Shahid, M.; Niazi, N.K.; Khan, M.I.; Amjad, M.; Hussain, M.; Natasha. Arsenic Uptake, Toxicity, Detoxification, and Speciation in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Aspects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hering, J.G.; Katsoyiannis, I.A.; Ahumada Theoduloz, G.; Berg, M.; Hug, S.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water: Experiences with technologies and constraints in practice. J. Environ. Engin. 2017, 143, 03117002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patel, K.S.; Pandey, P.K.; Martín-Ramos, P.; Corns, W.T.; Varol, S.; Bhattacharya, P.; Zhu, Y. A review on arsenic in the environment: Contamination, mobility, sources, and exposure. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 8803–8821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Roy, M.; Giri, A.K.; Dutta, S.; Mukherjee, P. Integrated phytobial remediation for sustainable management of arsenic in soil and water. Environ. Int. 2015, 75, 180–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Satyapal, G.K.; Rani, S.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, N. Potential role of arsenic resistant bacteria in bioremediation: Current status and future prospects. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2016, 8, 256–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Souri, Z.; Karimi, N.; Sandalio, L.M. Arsenic Hyperaccumulation Strategies: An Overview. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gadd, G.M. Arsenic Toxicity: An Arsenic-Hyperaccumulating Fern Uses a Bacterial-like Tolerance Mechanism. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R580–R582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, L.Q.; Komar, K.M.; Tu, C.; Zhang, W.H.; Cai, Y.; Kennelley, E.D. A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic—A hardy, versatile, fast-growing plant helps to remove arsenic from contaminated soils. Nature 2001, 409, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, T.; Yan, X.; Liao, X.; Xiao, X.; Huang, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhai, L. Subcellular distribution and compartmentalization of arsenic in Pteris vittata L. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2005, 50, 2843–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mathews, S.; Ma, L.Q.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Natarajan, S.; Saha, U.K. Arsenic transformation in the growth media and biomass of hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8024–8030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wan, X.M.; Lei, M.; Zhou, X.Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, T.; Zhou, G.D. Characterization of arsenic uptake in living Pteris vittata L. Instr. Sci. Technol. 2014, 42, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bona, E.; Cattaneo, C.; Cesaro, P.; Marsano, F.; Lingua, G.; Cavaletto, M.; Berta, G. Proteomic analysis of Pteris vittata fronds: Two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially modulate protein expression under arsenic contamination. Proteomics 2010, 10, 3811–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cesaro, P.; Cattaneo, C.; Bona, E.; Berta, G.; Cavaletto, M. The arsenic hyperaccumulating Pteris vittata expresses two arsenate reductases. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.G.; Chen, B.D.; Christie, P.; Li, X.L. Influence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on uptake of arsenate by the As hyperaccumulator fern Pteris vittata L. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Wang, H.B.; Wong, M.H.; Ye, Z.H. The role of arsenate reductase and superoxide dismutase in As accumulation in four Pteris species. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leung, H.M.; Ye, Z.H.; Wong, M.H. Interactions of mycorrhizal fungi with Pteris vittata (As hyperaccumulator) in As-contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 139, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leung, H.M.; Wu, F.Y.; Cheung, K.C.; Ye, Z.H.; Wong, M.H. The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Phosphate Amendement on Arsenic Uptake, Accumulation and Growth of Pteris vittata in As-Contaminated Soil. Inter. J. Phytorem. 2010, 12, 384–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cantamessa, S.; Massa, N.; Gamalero, E.; Berta, G. Phytoremediation of a Highly Arsenic Polluted Site, Using Pteris vittata L. and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Plants 2020, 9, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, A.; Teplitski, M.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Ma, L. Characterization of arsenic-resistant bacteria from the rhizosphere of arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Can. J. Microbiol. 2010, 56, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, L.J.; Guan, D.X.; Luo, J.; Rathinasabapathi, B.; Ma, L.Q. Characterization of arsenic-resistant endophytic bacteria from hyperaccumulators Pteris vittata and Pteris multifida. Chemosphere 2014, 113, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Han, Y.H.; Jia, M.R.; Liu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, D.L.; Chen, Y.; Ma, L.Q. Bacteria from the rhizosphere and tissues of As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata and their role in arsenic transformation. Chemosphere 2017, 186, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tiwari, S.; Sarangi, B.K.; Thul, S.T. Identification of arsenic resistant endophytic bacteria from Pteris vittata roots and characterization for arsenic remediation application. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, K.; Xiang, Q.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q. Genetic diversity and characterization of arsenic-resistant endophytic bacteria isolated from Pteris vittata, an arsenic hyperaccumulator. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, X.; Kong, T.; Huang, D.; Chen, Z.; Kolton, M.; Yang, J.; Huang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Gao, P.; Yang, N.; et al. Arsenic (As) oxidation by core endosphere microbiome mediates As speciation in Pteris vittata roots. J. Hazard Mater. 2023, 454, 131458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lampis, S.; Santi, C.; Ciurli, A.; Andreolli, M.; Vallini, G. Promotion of arsenic phytoextraction efficiency in the fern Pteris vittata by the inoculation of As-resistant bacteria: A soil bioremediation perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abou-Shanab, R.A.I.; Santelli, C.M.; Sadowsky, M.J. Bioaugmentation with As-transforming bacteria improves arsenic availability and uptake by the hyperaccumulator plant Pteris vittata (L). Int. J. Phytorem. 2022, 24, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, C.; Ho, Y.N.; Inoue, C.; Chien, M.F. Long-term effectiveness of microbe-assisted arsenic phytoremediation by Pteris vittata in field trials. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Antenozio, M.L.; Giannelli, G.; Marabottini, R.; Brunetti, P.; Allevato, E.; Marzi, D.; Capobianco, G.; Bonifazi, G.; Serranti, S.; Visioli, G.; et al. Phytoextraction efficiency of Pteris vittata grown on a naturally As-rich soil and characterization of As-resistant rhizosphere bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Trouvelot, A.; Kough, J.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae, Proceedings of the 1st European Symposium on Mycorrhizae, Dijon, France, 1–5 July 1985; INRA: Paris, France, 1986; Volume 1, pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  36. Novello, G.; Bona, E.; Toumatia, O.; Vuolo, F.; Bouras, N.; Titouah, H.; Zitouni, A.; Gorrasi, S.; Massa, N.; Cesaro, P.; et al. Rhizosphere Bacterial Isolation from Indigenous Plants in Arid and Semi-Arid Algerian Soils: Implications for Plant Growth Enhancement. Processes 2023, 11, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Brito, A.M.; Gagne, S.; Antoun, H. Effect of compost on rhizosphere microflora of the tomato and on the incidence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Escudero, L.V.; Casamayor, E.O.; Chong, G.; Pedrós-Alió, C.; Demergasso, C. Distribution of Microbial Arsenic Reduction, Oxidation and Extrusion Genes along a Wide Range of Environmental Arsenic Concentrations. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tu, C.; Ma, L.Q. Effects of arsenic concentrations and forms on arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator ladder brake. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xiao, X.; Chen, T.; An, Z.; Lei, M.; Huang, Z.; Liao, X.; Liu, Y. Potential of Pteris vittata L. for phytoremediation of sites co-contaminated with cadmium and arsenic: The tolerance and accumulation. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cui, S.; Xiao, H.; Miao, D.; Yang, W. Metal uptake and translocation by Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata) and diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities under single and combined arsenic and cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 85198–85209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hiltner, L. Über Neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf Dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründüngung und Brache; Gesellschaft: Berlin, Germany, 1904; pp. 69–78. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  44. Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar]
  45. Trotta, A.; Falaschi, P.; Cornara, L.; Minganti, V.; Fusconi, A.; Drava, G.; Berta, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizae increase the arsenic translocation factor in the As hyperaccumulating fern Pteris vittata L. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jackson, C.R.; Harrison, K.G.; Dugas, S.L. Enumeration and characterization of culturable arsenate resistant bacteria in a large estuary. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 28, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Magar, L.B.; Rayamajhee, B.; Khadka, S.; Karki, G.; Thapa, A.; Yasir, M.; Thapa, S.; Panta, O.P.; Sharma, S.; Poudel, P. Detection of Bacillus Species with Arsenic Resistance and Plant Growth-Promoting Efficacy from Agricultural Soils of Nepal. Scientifica 2022, 19, 9675041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Román-Ponce, B.; Ramos-Garza, J.; Arroyo-Herrera, I.; Maldonado-Hernández, J.; Bahena-Osorio, Y.; Vásquez-Murrieta, M.S.; Wang, E.T. Mechanism of arsenic resistance in endophytic bacteria isolated from endemic plant of mine tailings and their arsenophore production. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, L.; Shi, W.; Zeng, X.C.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Mu, Y.; Liu, Y. Draft genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. strain B6 isolated from the high-arsenic sediments in Datong Basin, China. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2017, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Achour, A.R.; Bauda, P.; Billard, P. Diversity of arsenite transporter genes from arsenic-resistant soil bacteria. Res. Microbiol. 2007, 158, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Banerjee, A.; Sarkar, S.; Gorai, S.; Kabiraj, A.; Bandopadhyay, R. High arsenic tolerance in Brevundimonas aurantiaca PFAB1 from an arsenic-rich Indian hot spring. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 53, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soto, J.; Charles, T.C.; Lynch, M.D.J.; Larama, G.; Herrera, H.; Arriagada, C. Genome Sequence of Brevundimonas sp., an Arsenic Resistant Soil Bacterium. Diversity 2021, 13, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Singh, N.; Marwa, N.; Mishra, S.K.; Mishra, J.; Verma, P.C.; Rathaur, S.; Singh, N. Brevundimonas diminuta mediated alleviation of arsenic toxicity and plant growth promotion in Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 125, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gamalero, E.; Glick, B.R. Bacterial Modulation of Plant Ethylene Levels. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Prasad, M.N.; Freitas, H. Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, X.; Yang, G.M.; Guan, D.X.; Ghosh, P.; Ma, L.Q. Catecholate-siderophore produced by As-resistant bacterium effectively dissolved FeAsO4 and promoted Pteris vittata growth. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 206, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suhadolnik, M.L.; Salgado, A.P.; Scholte, L.L.; Bleicher, L.; Costa, P.S.; Reis, M.P.; Dias, M.F.; Ávila, M.P.; Barbosa, F.A.; Chartone-Souza, E. Novel arsenic-transforming bacteria and the diversity of their arsenic-related genes and enzymes arising from arsenic-polluted freshwater sediment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, Y.G.; Yoshinaga, M.; Zhao, F.J.; Rosen, B.P. Earth abides arsenic biotransformations. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 2014, 42, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sevak, P.; Pushkar, B. Bacterial responses towards arsenic toxicity and in-depth analysis of molecular mechanism along with possible on-field application. J. Environ. Chem. Engin. 2023, 11, 110187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Silver, S.; Phung, L.T. A bacterial view of the periodic table: Genes and proteins for toxic inorganic ions. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 32, 587–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. William, V.U.; Magpantay, H.D. Arsenic and Microorganisms: Genes, Molecular Mechanisms, and Recent Advances in Microbial Arsenic Bioremediation. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saltikov, C.W.; Wildman, R.A.; Newman, D.K. Expression dynamics of arsenic respiration and detoxification in Shewanella sp. strain ANA-3. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 7390–7396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, F.Y.; Leung, H.M.; Wu, S.C.; Ye, Z.H.; Wong, M.H. Variation in arsenic, lead and zinc tolerance and accumulation in six populations of Pteris vittata L. from China. Environ Pollut. 2009, 157, 2394–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. GPS image of the industrial site: the blue label indicates the experimental field where mycorrhizal P. vittata was cultivated (44°53′15″ N 8°40′07″ E). The site is located in northwestern Italy and is polluted by heavy metals due to the metallurgic planting facility’s activities.
Figure 1. GPS image of the industrial site: the blue label indicates the experimental field where mycorrhizal P. vittata was cultivated (44°53′15″ N 8°40′07″ E). The site is located in northwestern Italy and is polluted by heavy metals due to the metallurgic planting facility’s activities.
Soilsystems 08 00087 g001
Figure 2. Image describing the different stages of the experimental procedure used: (i) soil sampling from the roots of P. vittata cultivated in the industrial site; (ii) bacterial isolation on agar plates; (iii) Gram staining and identification of the selected strains via MALDI (Matrix-152 Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization) and TOF/TOF (UltrafleXtreme, Bruker) system; (iv) characterization of plant beneficial physiological traits and determination of the arsenite and arsenate tolerance of the bacterial strains; (v) occurrence of arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase genes assessed by PCR amplification. This image was created with BioRender (https://www.biorender.com, accessed on 30 July 2024), Toronto, Canada.
Figure 2. Image describing the different stages of the experimental procedure used: (i) soil sampling from the roots of P. vittata cultivated in the industrial site; (ii) bacterial isolation on agar plates; (iii) Gram staining and identification of the selected strains via MALDI (Matrix-152 Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization) and TOF/TOF (UltrafleXtreme, Bruker) system; (iv) characterization of plant beneficial physiological traits and determination of the arsenite and arsenate tolerance of the bacterial strains; (v) occurrence of arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase genes assessed by PCR amplification. This image was created with BioRender (https://www.biorender.com, accessed on 30 July 2024), Toronto, Canada.
Soilsystems 08 00087 g002
Figure 3. Distribution (frequency) of the bacterial genera found in bulk soil (A) and rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata (B) in the industrial site considered.
Figure 3. Distribution (frequency) of the bacterial genera found in bulk soil (A) and rhizosphere of mycorrhizal P. vittata (B) in the industrial site considered.
Soilsystems 08 00087 g003
Table 1. Primer sets used for arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase gene PCR amplifications.
Table 1. Primer sets used for arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase gene PCR amplifications.
Primer SetPrimer NamePrimer Sequence (5′–3′)
arsC-Grx-Sunamlt-42-FTCG CGT AAT ACG CTG GAG AT
amlt-376-RACT TTC TCG CCG TCT TCC TT
smrc-42-FTCA CGC AAT ACC CTT GAA ATG ATC
smrc-376-RACC TTT TCA CCG TCC TCT TTC GT
arsC-Grx-SaltikovQ-arsC-F1GAT TTA CCA TAA TCC GGC CTG T
Q-arsC-R1GGC GTC TCA AGG TAG AGG ATA A
Arsenate reductasearsC-Trx-VillegasarsCGP-FwTGC TG ATTT AGT TGT TAC GC
arsCGP-RvTTC CTT CAA CCT ATT CCC TA
arsC-Trx1aarsC 4FTCH TGY CGH AGY CAA ATG GCH GAA G
arsC 4RGCN GGA TCV TCR AAW CCC CAR TG
arsC-Trx1barsC 5FGGH AAY TCH TGY CGN AGY CAA ATG GC
arsC 5RGCN GGA TCV TCR AAW CCC CAR NWC
arsC-Trx2arsC 6FCAC VTG CMG RAA DGC RAR RVV DTG GCTCG
arsC 6R2TTR WAS CCN ACG WTA ACA KKH YYK YC
arrA1arrA FAAG GTG TAT GGA ATA AAG CGT TTG TBG GHG AYT T
arrA RCCT GTG ATT TCA GGT GCC CAY TY V GGN GT
arrA2AS1 FCGA AGT TCG TCC CGA THA CNT GG
Arsenate respiratory reductase AS1 RGGG GTG CGG TCY TTN ARY TC
AS2 FGTC CCN ATB ASN TGG GAN RAR GCN MT
arrA3HAArrA-D1FCCG CTA CTA CAC CGA GGG CWW YTG GGR NTA
HAArrA-G2RCGT GCG GTC CTT GAG CTC NWD RTT CCA CC
Table 2. PCR amplification program details for specific set of primers.
Table 2. PCR amplification program details for specific set of primers.
ArsC 4F/ArsC 4RArsC 5F/ArsC 5RArsC 6F/ArsC 6R2ArsCGP-Fw/ArsCGP-RvQ-arsC-F1/Q-arsC-R
95 °C    5′95 °C    5′95 °C    5′95 °C     5′95 °C    5′
95 °C    1′95 °C    1′95 °C    1′95 °C     1′95 °C    1′
46.7 °C   1′    40 cycles60 °C    1′    40 cycles54.5 °C   1′    40 cycles48 °C     1′    40 cycles60 °C    1′    40 cycles
72 °C      50″72 °C    50″72 °C    50″72 °C    50″72 °C    50″
72 °C      10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′
NESTED-PCR n1
AS1 F/AS1 R
NESTED-PCR n2
AS2 F/AS1 R
HAArrA-D1 F/HAArrA-G2 RarrA F/arrA Ramlt-42-F/amlt-376-R/smrc-42-F/smrc-376-R
mix
95 °C    5′95 °C    5′95 °C    5′95 °C    5′95 °C    5′
95 °C    1′95 °C    1′95 °C    1′95 °C    1′95 °C    1′
50 °C    1′    35 cycles55 °C    1′    30 cycles53.5 °C   1′    40 cycles50 °C    1′    40 cycles60 °C    1′    40 cycles
72 °C    1′72 °C    1′72 °C    1′72 °C    30″72 °C    50″
72 °C    10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′72 °C    10′
Table 3. Identification and physiological characterization (growth temperature, siderophore production, phosphate solubilization and synthesis of auxin) of strain isolated from mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata (PTV, without added As and PTV-As, with added As) and bulk soil (BS, without added As and BS-As, with added As).
Table 3. Identification and physiological characterization (growth temperature, siderophore production, phosphate solubilization and synthesis of auxin) of strain isolated from mycorrhizosphere of P. vittata (PTV, without added As and PTV-As, with added As) and bulk soil (BS, without added As and BS-As, with added As).
StrainTaxonomy IdentificationGrowth 4 °CGrowth 28 °CGrowth 37 °CGrowth 42 °CCAS *DCP/TCP #IAA @
BS1Arthrobacter sp.+++-2.800
BS3Arthrobacter sp.++++000
BS5Bacillus sp.+++-000
BS6Bacillus sp.+++±001
BS7Pseudomonas sp.++--2.400
BS8Pseudoarthrobacter oxydans+++-000
BS9Pseudomonas sp.++--2.800
BS10Pseudomonas marginalis++++2.502
BS11Janibacter sp.+++-001
BS12Arthrobacter sp.+++-000
BS15Bacillus sp.++--000
BS16Bacillus sp.+++--000
BS18Pseudomonas brassicacearum++--1.900
BS19Pseudomonas thivervalensis++--3.402
BS20Pseudomonas sp.+++-3.100
BS-As2Arthrobacter sp.+++-002
BS-As3Pseudomonas sp.++++2.300
BS-As6Pseudomonas sp.-++-000
BS-As7Pseudomonas marginalis++--000
BS-As11Bacillus sp.++++001
BS-As12Brevundimonas diminuta+++±000
BS-As13Pseudomonas sp.-++-1.800
BS-As14Oerskovia sp.++--1.400
BS-As19Pseudomonas marginalis+++-2.702
BS-As22Pseudomonas marginalis+++--000
PTV7Janibacter sp.-+++000
PTV9Microbacterium sp.++++000
PTV15Bacillus megaterium± §+++1.103
PTV18Pedobacter sp.+++±000
PTV20Brevundimonas diminuta+++±000
PTV21Bacillus sp.++++1.400
PTV22Bacillus cereus--+++000
PTV23Bacillus pumilus-+++1.200
PTV25Janibacter sp.++++000
PTV28Brevundimonas diminuta-+++000
PTV30Bacillus thuringensis-+++000
PTV-As3Micrococcus sp.-++--000
PTV-As5Brevundimonas diminuta-++-001
PTV-As7Brevundimonas diminuta-++-002
PTV-As8Bacillus sp.-++-3.302
PTV-As9Janibacter sp.++++2.300
PTV-As15Bacillus sp.-+++000
PTV-As23Bacillus pumilus+++±2.901
PTV-As26Bacillus sp.+++-000
PTV-As29Pseudomonas marginalis+++±2.500
§ The use of the symbol ± stands for limited growth. * CAS: Siderophore production was expressed as the ratio between the two diameters of the halo and the two diameters of the colony. # Phosphate solubilization. DCP = Dicalcium phosphate and TCP = Tricalcium phosphate. @ Synthesis of IAA was expressed as intensity color scale (0 = no color, 1 = light pink, 2 = pink, 3 = light red, 4 = red).
Table 4. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values of sodium arsenate and sodium arsenite for the 45 selected bacterial strains.
Table 4. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values of sodium arsenate and sodium arsenite for the 45 selected bacterial strains.
StrainArsenate
mM
Arsenite
mM
Arthrobacter sp.BS1>600>4
Arthrobacter sp.BS3600>4
Bacillus sp.BS5300>4
Bacillus sp.BS6300>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS7300>4
Pseudoarthrobacter oxydansBS8300>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS9300>4
Pseudomonas marginalisBS10150>4
Janibacter sp.BS11300>4
Arthrobacter sp.BS12300>4
Bacillus sp.BS15150>4
Bacillus sp.BS16300>4
Pseudomonas brassicacearumBS18150>4
Pseudomonas thivervalensisBS19150>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS20150>4
Arthrobacter sp.BS-As2600>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As3600>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As6150>4
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As7300>4
Bacillus sp.BS-As11300>4
Brevundimonas diminutaBS-As12600>4
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As13150>4
Oerskovia sp.BS-As14600>4
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As1975>4
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As22150>4
Janibacter sp.PTV7600>4
Microbacterium sp.PTV9ND *>4
Bacillus megateriumPTV1575>4
Pedobacter sp.PTV1875>4
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV20600>4
Bacillus sp.PTV21150>4
Bacillus cereusPTV22150>4
Bacillus pumilusPTV23600>4
Janibacter sp.PTV25300>4
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV28600>4
Bacillus thuringensisPTV30300>4
Micrococcus sp.PTV-As3600>4
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV-As5600>4
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV-As7600>4
Bacillus sp.PTV-As8600>4
Janibacter sp.PTV-As9600>4
Bacillus sp.PTV-As15300>4
Bacillus pumilusPTV-As23600>4
Bacillus sp.PTV-As26300>4
Pseudomonas marginalisPTV-As29300>4
* ND = Not determined.
Table 5. Occurrence of arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase gene in the selected bacterial strains.
Table 5. Occurrence of arsenate reductase and arsenate respiratory reductase gene in the selected bacterial strains.
StrainArsC-Trx1aArsC-Trx1bArsC-Trx2ArsC-Trx VillegasarrA1 Ars-RespiratoryarrA2 Ars-RespiratoryarrA3 Ars-Respiratory
Arsenate ReductaseArsenate Respiratory Reductase
Arthrobacter sp.BS1+------
Arthrobacter sp.BS3+------
Bacillus sp.BS5+---+--
Bacillus sp.BS6+---++-
Pseudomonas sp.BS7--+-+--
Pseudoarthrobacter oxydansBS8+------
Pseudomonas sp.BS9+-+-+--
Pseudomonas marginalisBS10--++++-
Janibacter sp.BS11+------
Arthrobacter sp.BS12+------
Bacillus sp.BS15+------
Bacillus sp.BS16+------
Pseudomonas brassicacearumBS18--+-++-
Pseudomonas thivervalensisBS19--+-+--
Pseudomonas sp.BS20+-+-+--
Arthrobacter sp.BS-As2+----+-
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As3+-+--+-
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As6+----+-
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As7--+-+--
Bacillus sp.BS-As11+-+----
Brevundimonas diminutaBS-As12+------
Pseudomonas sp.BS-As13+-+--+-
Oerskovia sp.BS-As14--+-+--
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As19-++-+--
Pseudomonas marginalisBS-As22-++-++-
Janibacter sp.PTV7+------
Microbacterium sp.PTV9+------
Bacillus megateriumPTV15++-----
Pedobacter sp.PTV18++-----
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV20+-+--+-
Bacillus sp.PTV21+----+-
Bacillus cereusPTV22+----+-
Bacillus pumilusPTV23+----+-
Janibacter sp.PTV25+------
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV28+------
Bacillus thuringensisPTV30++-----
Micrococcus sp.PTV-As4+-++-+-
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV-As5+-+--+-
Brevundimonas diminutaPTV-As7+-+--+-
Bacillus sp.PTV-As8+----+-
Janibacter sp.PTV-As9+--+-+-
Bacillus sp.PTV-As15+----+-
Bacillus pumilusPTV-As23++--++-
Bacillus sp.PTV-As26+----+-
Pseudomonas marginalisPTV-As29--++++-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Novello, G.; Gamalero, E.; Cesaro, P.; Campana, D.; Cantamessa, S.; Massa, N.; Berta, G.; Lingua, G.; Bona, E. Screening of As-Resistant Bacterial Strains from the Bulk Soil and the Rhizosphere of Mycorrhizal Pteris vittata Cultivated in an Industrial Multi-Polluted Site. Soil Syst. 2024, 8, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8030087

AMA Style

Novello G, Gamalero E, Cesaro P, Campana D, Cantamessa S, Massa N, Berta G, Lingua G, Bona E. Screening of As-Resistant Bacterial Strains from the Bulk Soil and the Rhizosphere of Mycorrhizal Pteris vittata Cultivated in an Industrial Multi-Polluted Site. Soil Systems. 2024; 8(3):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8030087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Novello, Giorgia, Elisa Gamalero, Patrizia Cesaro, Daniela Campana, Simone Cantamessa, Nadia Massa, Graziella Berta, Guido Lingua, and Elisa Bona. 2024. "Screening of As-Resistant Bacterial Strains from the Bulk Soil and the Rhizosphere of Mycorrhizal Pteris vittata Cultivated in an Industrial Multi-Polluted Site" Soil Systems 8, no. 3: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8030087

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop