Next Article in Journal
Tectonic Control of Aseismic Creep and Potential for Induced Seismicity Along the West Valley Fault in Southeastern Metro Manila, Philippines
Previous Article in Journal
Towards a Modern and Sustainable Sediment Management Plan in Mountain Catchment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides

by
Tomoyuki Takabatake
* and
Ryosei Takemoto
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi Osaka City 577-8502, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GeoHazards 2024, 5(4), 1152-1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040054
Submission received: 26 August 2024 / Revised: 15 October 2024 / Accepted: 17 October 2024 / Published: 21 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Using the existing two-dimensional experimental data and Open-source Fields Operation and Manipulation (OpenFOAM) software, this study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis of three types of landslide-generated tsunamis (subaerial, partially submerged, and submarine). The primary objective was to assess whether numerical simulations can accurately reproduce the experimental results of each type and to compare the predictive equations of the tsunami amplitudes derived from experimental and simulated data. The mesh size and dynamic viscosity parameters were initially optimized for a specific partially submerged landslide tsunami scenario and then applied across a broader range of experimental scenarios. Most of the simulated wave amplitudes remained within the 50% error margin, although significant discrepancies were observed between landslide types. When focusing on the crest amplitude of the first wave, the simulations of subaerial landslides least deviated from the experimental data, with a mean absolute percentage error of approximately 20%, versus approximately 40% for the partially submerged and submarine landslides. The predictive equations derived from the simulations closely matched those from the experimental data, confirming that OpenFOAM can effectively capture complex landslide–tsunami dynamics. Nonetheless, variations in the coefficients related to slope angles highlight the need for further calibration to enhance the simulation fidelity.
Keywords: tsunami; landslide; subaerial landslide; partially submerged landslide; submarine landslide; OpenFOAM; multiphase; predictive equations tsunami; landslide; subaerial landslide; partially submerged landslide; submarine landslide; OpenFOAM; multiphase; predictive equations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takabatake, T.; Takemoto, R. Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides. GeoHazards 2024, 5, 1152-1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040054

AMA Style

Takabatake T, Takemoto R. Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides. GeoHazards. 2024; 5(4):1152-1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takabatake, Tomoyuki, and Ryosei Takemoto. 2024. "Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides" GeoHazards 5, no. 4: 1152-1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040054

APA Style

Takabatake, T., & Takemoto, R. (2024). Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides. GeoHazards, 5(4), 1152-1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5040054

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop