Next Article in Journal
Green Hydrogen and the Energy Transition: Hopes, Challenges, and Realistic Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of the Green Hydrogen Value Chain Technologies and Their Challenges for a Net-Zero Future
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Various ABO3 Perovskites (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as Oxygen Carrier Materials in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production

by
Antigoni Evdou
1,* and
Vassilis Zaspalis
1,2,*
1
Center for Research and Technology-Hellas, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrogen 2025, 6(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020027
Submission received: 14 March 2025 / Revised: 7 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 17 April 2025

Abstract

:
This study comparatively evaluates the performance of ABO3 perovskite materials (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as oxygen carriers in three-step Chemical Looping Hydrogen (CLH) technology, focusing on redox behavior, oxygen transport capacity, hydrogen production, and selectivity under controlled pulse-mode conditions. The redox behavior of the materials is analyzed in relation to their defect chemistry. Perovskites such as (La1−xCax)MnO3, (La1−xSrx)MnO3, and (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn1−xFex)O3 were synthesized via wet chemical methods and tested in chemical looping cycles. Doping A-site cations with Ca or Sr enhanced oxygen delivery capacity by more than 100% upon reduction with CH4 when dopant content (x) increased from 0 to 0.5. However, H2 selectivity decreased from 52% to 2.5% for (La1−xCax)MnO3 and from 46% to 14% for (La1−xSrx)MnO3 under the same conditions. In contrast, substituting Mn with Fe significantly improved hydrogen production, particularly in LaFeO3, which exhibited the highest hydrogen selectivity and yield. At 1000 °C, LaFeO3 produced nearly 10 mmol H2 g−1, with 80% generated during the reduction step at 99.9% selectivity and the remaining 20% during the water-splitting step at 100% selectivity. These results are linked to the extent of B-site cation reduction reactions (i) B4+ → B3+, which facilitates complete fuel oxidation and (ii) B3+ → B2+, which leads to partial fuel oxidation. The reverse of (ii) also contributes to H2 production during water splitting. Additionally, the study assesses the materials’ microstructure and stability over prolonged cycles. The findings highlight Fe-based perovskites, particularly LaFeO3, as promising candidates for CLH applications, emphasizing the need for structural and compositional optimization to enhance hydrogen production efficiency.

1. Introduction

Chemical looping processes play a crucial role in advancing sustainable energy and industrial applications by enabling efficient combustion, hydrogen production, and carbon capture [1,2,3]. These processes utilize single or mixed metal oxides as oxygen carriers to facilitate oxidation and reduction reactions without direct contact between fuel and air, significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In energy production, chemical looping combustion (CLC) inherently separates CO2, making carbon capture more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Additionally, chemical looping hydrogen technology (CLH) supports hydrogen generation and syngas production, contributing to cleaner fuels and decarbonization efforts.
Among various chemical looping technologies, CLH has attracted considerable research interest [4,5,6] due to its ability to produce hydrogen while inherently separating carbon dioxide. The process involves metal oxides as oxygen carriers, facilitating fuel oxidation in a cyclical reaction. It typically consists of three main steps: (1) Reduction of the metal oxide with a carbonaceous fuel (e.g., natural gas or biomass) producing a reduced or oxygen-deficient oxide and CO2, (2) oxidation of the reduced material with steam to generate high-purity hydrogen, and (3) regeneration of the metal oxide using air to complete the cycle.
In the CLH process, the oxygen carrier is a key component that directly influences hydrogen yield, reaction kinetics and process stability. An ideal oxygen carrier should exhibit high oxygen capacity, thermal and chemical stability, and resistance to deactivation over multiple cycles. Optimizing its composition and properties is essential for improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions, and ensuring the long-term viability of CLH.
Numerous materials have been investigated as oxygen carriers in CLH, each exhibiting unique properties under different operating conditions. Commonly used oxygen carriers include: Iron-based carriers (i.e., Fe2O3/Fe3O4 [7]), ferrite-spinel materials A0.25Fe2.75O4 (where A = Co, Cu, Ni, Zn or Mn) [8]), Fe2O3-Al2O3-based carriers [9]), Nickel-based carriers (i.e., NiO/Ni [10], NiFe2O4 [11], Copper-based carriers (i.e., CuO/Cu2O [12]), or Manganese-based carriers (i.e., Mn2O3/Mn3O4 or MnFe2O4 [13,14]). Additionally, perovskite materials have gained significant attention in CLH due to their excellent redox properties, structural stability, and tunable oxygen transport capacity [4,6,15]. Their unique crystal structure enables efficient oxygen exchange, enhancing hydrogen production while enabling inherent CO2 separation. Furthermore, perovskites offer high thermal and chemical stability, making them more durable over multiple reaction cycles compared to conventional metal oxides. By optimizing their composition and properties, perovskites have the potential to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of the CLH process, positioning them as promising candidates for next-generation energy technologies.
Manganate perovskites have been extensively investigated for their redox behavior in Chemical Looping Technologies. However, reports on their behavior in the three-step Chemical Looping with Hydrogen (CLH) process, including water splitting, are scarce in the literature [16]. CaMnO3 has been reported to be a suitable material for Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) because it exhibits the oxygen uncoupling effect [17], while its reactivity and resistance seem to increase with the addition of certain dopants such as Ti or Mg [18,19]. LaMnO3 perovskites are considered suitable for the Chemical Looping Reforming (CLR) process. Partial substitution of La3+ with divalent ions such as Ca2+ and Sr2+ increases the oxygen delivery capacity and promotes total oxidation of the fuel [20,21,22]. Similarly, partial substitution of Mn with elements such as Al, Fe, or Co enhances hydrogen production [23,24]. Regarding the three-step CLH process, the most extensively investigated materials so far are those based on iron, such as Fe2O3 [7,25] and Fe-based perovskites [26]. In particular, LaFeO3 has emerged as a very promising material. It is generally accepted that CH4 oxidation over LaFeO3 proceeds via a Mars–van Krevelen mechanism, utilizing lattice oxygen and regenerating it during the oxidation cycle [27]. Current research directions focus on optimizing LaFeO3’s structural performance by developing advanced morphologies, such as synthesizing nanoscale-structured LaFeO3 [28] or fabricating three-dimensionally ordered macroporous structures [29] to increase surface area, porosity, and oxygen accessibility. In addition, significant research effort is being devoted to optimizing its chemical performance through the incorporation of dopants (e.g., Ni, Sr, Co, or Ir) to modify the A- or B-site in the perovskite, thereby improving oxygen vacancy formation [30,31,32,33].
While extensive research has been conducted, directly comparing these materials remains challenging due to variations in reactor design, temperature, pressure, fuel type, and reaction conditions. Differences in experimental setups and evaluation criteria further complicate performance assessments. Moreover, the role of oxygen vacancies—responsible for the total or partial reduction with the fuel and subsequent oxidation with H2O—is often described in general terms without being explicitly linked to the specific defect chemistry characteristics of the materials.
This study focuses on perovskite materials of the general formula [La1−x(Ca/Sr/)x](Mn1−yFey)O3, evaluating their performance as oxygen carriers in CLH. The research examines their oxygen transport capacity, product selectivity and hydrogen production under identical operation conditions. Experiments were conducted in pulse mode to enable precise and controlled investigation of the materials’ redox behavior. The study also explores how the redox behavior correlates with the defect chemistry of the materials.

2. Materials and Methods

All perovskites with the general formula (A1−xMx)(Mn1−yFey)O3 A = La, Ca, Sr were wet chemically prepared using the citrate method [34,35]. The nitrate salts of the metals used were La(NO3)3⦁6H2O (Alfa Aesar; 99.9%), Ca(NO3)2⦁4H2O (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA; 99.0%), Sr(NO3)3⦁6H2O (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA; 99.0%), Mn(NO3)2⦁4H2O (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA; 98.5%), and Fe(NO3)3⦁9H2O (Carlo Erba, Cornaredo, Italy; 98.0%). Stoichiometric amounts of the precursors of the corresponding metals were dissolved in deionized water. After the addition of an aqueous citric acid C6H8O7⦁H2O (Chemsolute, Renningen, Germany; 99.5%) solution, 10% in excess, the solution was stirred for 15 min at 25 °C. The water was evaporated at 70 °C, and the obtained solid was dried in an oven at 250 °C overnight. Finally, the solids were calcined at 1000 °C in air for 6 h. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) to examine the crystalline structure of the samples at various stages of the CLH process. Morphological examinations were performed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-IT500, Tokyo, Japan) on gold-sputtered specimens.
A schematic flow diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. A U-type microreactor, with an outer diameter of 6 mm and an inner diameter of 4 mm, was used for the reactivity experiments, conducted in pulse mode at a constant temperature of 1000 °C, with some experiments also performed at 900 °C. Pulse mode operation allows for the stepwise introduction of reactants, providing detailed insights into oxygen release, fuel conversion, and material cyclic stability. This approach minimizes the influence of external factors such as gas flow dynamics and reactor design, enabling a more accurate evaluation of intrinsic material properties. The duration of each 100 μL pulse of CH4 or O2 was 2 min. The time required for the loop valve to fill with the reactant was 1 min. The carrier gas was He, flowing at 50 cm3 (STP) min −1. All gases were of were of high purity (>99.999%).
Approximately 100 mg of material was placed in the reactor, heated to the experimental temperature, and equilibrated under a helium atmosphere. Typically, 25 pulses of undiluted CH4 were introduced into the reactor via a 100 μL loop valve. In some cases, reduction steps involving 50 or 95 CH4 pulses were conducted. The reduction step was followed by water injections until no further variations in the material’s oxygen content were observed. Oxidation was completed using 100 μL O2 pulses until the material returned to a fully oxidized state, completing one cycle. Throughout this article, the terms “reduction” and “oxidation” refer to the oxygen carrier rather than the other reactants.
The reactor outlet stream was directed to a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Vacuum Omnistar GSD 350, Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH, Asslar, Germany.) for quantitative analysis. The mass fractions corresponding to H2O (m/e: 18, 17, 16), H2 (m/e: 2), O2 (m/e: 32, 16), CO (m/e: 28, 12), and CO2 (m/e: 44, 28, 12) were monitored after each pulse throughout the three-step cycle. The mass spectrometer response to each reactant and reaction product was calibrated using pulse injections of pure substances or calibration mixtures. Prior to evaluating the perovskites, control experiments were conducted using an empty reactor or a reactor containing inactive α-Al2O3 powder, ensuring no external activity influenced the results. In all experiments, only CO, CO2, H2 and H2O were detected as reaction products.
The conversion of CH4 per pulse X C H 4 was defined as the percentage of injected CH4 that was consumed (converted to CO and CO2):.
X C H 4 = n C H 4 ,   c o n s . n C H 4 ,     i n j . × 100
where n C H 4 ,   c o n s . and n C H 4 ,   i n j . represent the consumed and injected moles of CH4, respectively. The exact amount of injected CH4 was determined based on the sum of unreacted CH4, CO and CO2. This value was cross-verified using the sum of unreacted CH4, H2 and H2O. No discrepancies larger than 5% were observed, which falls within the experimental error, accounting for uncertainties in integrating the water peak. These results strongly indicate that carbon deposition, if any, was negligible and was therefore not considered. Furthermore, during the subsequent water splitting step or oxidation steps, no detectable traces of CO or CO2 were observed in the reaction products, as confirmed by mass spectrometry.
The hydrogen selectivity S H 2 and yield Y H 2 per pulse, were defined as follows:
S H 2 = n H 2 2 × n C H 4 ,     c o n s .   × 100
Y H 2 = n H 2 2 × n C H 4 ,     i n j .   × 100
where n H 2 the moles of the produced H2 per pulse. During the water-splitting step, were represented, and H2 was the only detected product. For reaction parameters referring to the entire reduction step involving multiple pulses, the corresponding mole numbers were determined cumulatively as the sum over all pulses, indicated by a bar over the symbols.
X C H 4 ¯ = 1 v n C H 4 ,   c o n s . 1 v n C H 4 ,   i n j .
      S H 2 ¯ = 1 v n H 2 2 × 1 v n C H 4 ,   c o n s .
      Y H 2 ¯ = 1 v n H 2 2 × 1 v n C H 4 ,   i n j .
1 ν n H 2 , 1 v n C H 4 ,   c o n s . , and 1 v n C H 4 ,   i n j . represents the moles of produced H2 and the consumed and injected CH4, respectively, summed over a number of ν pulses during the reduction step.
To estimate measurement accuracy, several experiments were repeated two or three times with a fresh catalyst loading in the reactor. In such cases, average values were plotted along with associated error intervals.

3. Results

3.1. (La1−xCax)MnO3, x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 Perovskites

All initially synthesized (La1−xCax)MnO3 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5) perovskite samples were examined by XRD to determine their structure. The analysis confirmed the presence of a single perovskite phase in all cases. The XRD spectra of the two end members of this series are shown in Figure 2 (spectra (a) and (b)). Occasionally, barely detectable traces of minor phases were observed, but these were considered insignificant in terms of their influence on the general redox behavior of the materials. As seen in Figure 2, the substitution of La3+ in rhombohedral LaMnO3 with Ca2+ or Sr2+ leads to an orthorhombic structure with a smaller unit cell size, as indicated by the shift of the diffraction peaks to larger diffraction angles. This agrees with previously reported results [21,35] and strongly suggests that the negative charge of the defect created by the dopant is compensated by the oxidation of Mn3+ to the smaller Mn4+, as will also be discussed in a subsequent paragraph.
All powders had comparable morphologies consisting of primary particles in the order of 2–5 μm, the majority of which form larger porous agglomerates up to 20–30 μm. Τhe BET surface areas of all synthesized perovskites were comparable, in all cases, ranging between 3 and 5 m2 g −1. More detailed information on the morphological characterization of the materials has been reported elsewhere [21,22]
Figure 3 presents the overall redox performance of the (La1−xCax)MnO3 materials over 25 CH4 pulses. As the Ca content increases, there is a notable increase in both the oxygen withdrawn from the material (Figure 3a) and the CH4 conversion (Figure 3b). However, this enhanced oxygen transport capacity is accompanied by a decrease in H2 selectivity and yield, which decline from S H 2 ¯ 52 % , and Y H 2 ¯ 16 % for LaMnO3 to S H 2 ¯ 2.5 % , and Y H 2 ¯ 1.5 % for (La0.5Ca0.5)MnO3. Simultaneously, the oxygen withdrawn from the material increased from 740 μmole g−1 to 1940 μmole g−1. The high-purity H2 produced during the water-splitting step remained relatively unaffected and varied between 150 and 270 μmole g−1, with a maximum observed at (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3.
The CH4 conversion, H2 yield and selectivity per pulse for the two end members of the series are shown in Figure 4. The behavior of the intermediate compositions falls between these two extremes.
Initially, CH4 conversions exceeding 90% were obtained. Despite the higher per-pulse CH4 conversion achieved with (La0.5Ca0.5)MnO3, the appearance of hydrogen in the reaction products was significantly delayed, and the total H2 yield remained low. It is evident that the enhanced oxygen delivery capacity of the materials, due to Ca substitution, primarily favors total oxidation of the fuel rather than H2 production.

3.2. (La1−xSrx)MnO3, x = 0, 0.3, 0.5 Perovskites

In a second experimental series, the divalent Ca2+ was replaced with Sr2+ at 0, 0.3 and 0.5 Sr2+ ions per chemical formula unit. A typical XRD spectrum of the end-member composition (La0.5Sr0.5)MnO3 is shown in Figure 2 (spectrum (c)), confirming the presence of a single perovskite phase. These experiments were conducted at 1000 °C.
Figure 5 presents the overall redox performance during the 25-pulse reduction step. A remarkable similarity is observed between these results and those for (La1−xCax)MnO3 (Figure 3). As the Sr content increases, CH4 conversion increases, while H2 selectivity and yield decrease (Figure 5b). The total H2 yield during reduction never exceeded 20%. The oxygen transport capacity also increases with increasing Sr content (Figure 5a). The H2 produced during the water splitting step does not appear to be significantly affected by the Sr content and remains approximately 300 μmoles g−1 for all materials. The somewhat higher levels of CH4 conversion and H2 production observed in comparison to (La1−xCax)MnO3 materials are likely due to the higher operating temperature.
The evolution of the CH4 conversion, H2 yield and selectivity during the 25-pulse reduction step is shown in Figure 6. for the two end members of the series. Similar results were obtained for the intermediate compositions.
A striking qualitative similarity is observed between Figure 4 and Figure 6. The addition of Sr favors total oxidation and delays the appearance of H2 produced by the partial oxidation of CH4. It appears that higher CH4 conversion promotes total oxidation rather than H2 production.

3.3. (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn1−xFex)O3, x = 0, 0.3, 0.5/LaFeO3 Perovskites

In the previous experimental series, the substitution occurred at the A-sites of the perovskite structure. In the current series using (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3 at the base material, Mn on the B-sites was gradually substituted by Fe. The XRD spectra of the fresh materials (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3, (La0.6Ca0.4)FeO3 and LaFeO3 are shown in Figure 2 (spectra (d) and (e)). No secondary phases were observed. The overall redox behavior of the materials is presented in Figure 7.
A notable difference is observed in this case. Unlike A-site substitutions, the total oxygen withdrawn from the solid decreases as Fe content on the B-sites increases (Figure 7a). The H2 produced during the reduction step initially increases, then decreases, reaching a minimum at a Fe content of approximately 0.8 Fe ions per formula unit. A similar trend was observed for the H2 yield during reduction. The H2 selectivity during the reduction step initially increases up to 0.4 Fe ions per formula unit, beyond which it remains approximately constant up to 0.8 Fe ions per unit.
However, when Fe entirely replaces Mn, a significant increase in H2 production, yield and selectivity is observed. Specifically, over 25 pulses, 1070 μmole H2 g−1 was produced during the reduction step, while 550 μmole H2 g −1 was generated during the water-splitting step. The corresponding H2 selectivity and yield during reduction were S H 2 ¯ 76 % , and Y H 2 ¯ 51 % , respectively. Furthermore, the H2 produced during the water-splitting step increased from an average value of 340 μmole H2 g−1 to 550 μmole H2 g−1. These results improved even further when Ca substitution on A-sites was removed, resulting in pure LaFeO3 perovskite. In this case, H2 selectivity and yield reached 94% and 89%, respectively, while 700 μmole H2 g−1 was produced during the subsequent water-splitting step.
In Figure 8a, the redox behavior per pulse is shown for (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3 and (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn0.7Fe0.3)O3, illustrating the effect of Fe substitution on the B-sites. Initially (up to the first ten pulses), both materials primarily favor total CH4 oxidation with negligible H2 production. However, as the reaction progresses, the effect of Fe becomes pronounced, leading to significantly higher H2 yields and selectivities. By the end of the reduction step, H2 selectivities up to 90% were achieved for (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn0.7Fe0.3)O3.
A significant shift occurs when Fe becomes the sole B-site component (Figure 8b). After an initial period of two pulses, a high and stable hydrogen selectivity of 80% is achieved, along with a constant CH4 conversion of 66% and an H2 yield exceeding 50%.
These results further improve when Ca is entirely removed from the A-sites, resulting in pure LaFeO3. During the reduction step, the reaction is almost entirely directed toward partial oxidation of CH4, leading to syngas production at very high CH4 conversions (>90%), selectivities (~100%) and yields (>95%). Additionally, during the subsequent water-splitting step, LaFeO3 demonstrated a high capacity for high-purity H2 production. Overall, regarding H2 production, LaFeO3 emerges as the best-performing material among all tested perovskites.
The comparative material evaluation was limited to 25 pulses during the reduction step, followed by subsequent water splitting until no further hydrogen production was observed. However, for the best-performing LaFeO3, it was deemed worthwhile to examine its behavior under prolonged reduction beyond 25 pulses. Figure 9 presents the oxygen removed during reduction or incorporated into the material during subsequent water splitting for reduction steps involving 25, 50 and 95 pulses. It is expressed as the stoichiometric parameter δ in LaFeO3−δ, where δ = 0 was arbitrarily set for the fresh material.
The amounts of produced hydrogen, along with the overall H2 yields and selectivity, are shown in Table 1.
In addition to demonstrating very good reproducibility, the results in Figure 9 indicate the material’s stability under prolonged reduction. Table 1 further shows that the reduction reaction is exclusively directed toward syngas production at CH4 conversions exceeding 90% in all cases. Moreover, the amount of H2 produced during water splitting increases as the degree of reduction in the material increases. Finally, with 95 CH4 pulses, a total H2 production of approximately 10 mmole g−1 (equivalent to approximately 225 mL (STP) H2 g−1) was achieved.
In Figure 10a and b, the results are shown after three consecutive three-step cycles involving reduction, oxidation with H2O and oxidation with O2. The reduction duration was 25 (Figure 10a) or 50 pulses (Figure 10b). Similar results were also obtained in 95 reduction pulses. Although the amount of oxygen withdrawn from the material and, consequently, the H2 produced during the reduction remains relatively constant, the H2 produced during the water-splitting step gradually decreases.
In Figure 11, the XRD results are shown after the first reduction step and after the H2O splitting step off the third cycle for cycles with reduction steps of 25 and 95 pulses. It can be seen that after reduction, the main perovskite phase is maintained; however, some La(OH)3 and metallic Fe are also formed, with their amounts increasing as the degree of reduction increases. After H2O splitting, these minor phases disappear, and the perovskite phases appear to be fully restored. Therefore, irreversible phase transformations cannot account for the progressively decreasing H2 production during water splitting.
In Figure 12, typical SEM images are shown for the fresh samples (Figure 12a–d) as well as for the samples after the first cycle (Figure 12e–h). The fresh particles exhibit a relatively open structure, consisting of randomly oriented layers that provide a sufficient external surface for reactant access (Figure 12a,b). After undergoing a 25-CH4 pulse reduction-H2O splitting-oxidation cycle, the particle structure becomes more compact (Figure 12e,f). A more noticeable difference is observed in the microstructure within these layers. In the fresh samples, pores are visible between the primary particles (Figure 12c,d), whereas in the reduced and oxidized samples, sintering has progressed, leading to fewer pores and a denser microstructure (Figure 12g,h). This phenomenon likely intensifies with an increasing number of cycles and may be responsible for the reduced H2 production during the H2O splitting step.

4. Discussion

The similarities in the redox behavior of (La1−xCax)MnO3 and (La1−xSrx)MnO3 perovskites can be explained by considering their defect chemistry [35,36,37,38]. The substitution of La3+ with Ca2+ or Sr2+ on A-sites creates negatively charged point defects, C a L a or S r L a , which are compensated by the oxidation of Mn3+ to Mn4+ on B-sites, leading to the formation of the positively charged point defect M n M n (point defect symbols follow the Kröger-Vink notation [39].
During the reduction step with CH4, Mn4+ is reduced to Mn3+, accompanied by the formation of positively charged oxygen vacancies V O , which take over the charge compensation for the defects introduced by the dopants. Consequently, as the dopant content (x) increases in (La1−xCax)MnO3 and (La1−xSrx)MnO3, the Mn4+ concentration increases. The subsequent reduction of Mn4+ leads to greater oxygen release and a higher V O concentration. This explains the increased oxygen release in Ca- and Sr-doped materials, as shown in Figure 3a and Figure 5a, and the enhanced overall CH4 conversion observed in Figure 3b and Figure 5b.
As reduction progresses and Mn4+ is depleted, further reduction of Mn3+ to Mn2+ occurs. It has been proposed that oxygen released by the Mn4+→Mn3+ reduction favors total fuel oxidation, whereas oxygen from the Mn3+→Mn2+ reduction leads to partial oxidation and H2 production. This observation aligns with the product evolution trends seen in the pulse sequence during the reduction step (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Higher dopant concentrations lead to increased Mn4+ content, requiring more pulses to deplete Mn4+ and initiate H2 production. The progressively decreasing CH4 conversion with pulse number (Figure 4 and Figure 6) likely results from the increasing difficulty of oxygen removal as the material becomes more oxygen-deficient. The overall CH4 conversion X C H 4 ¯ during reduction (Figure 3b and Figure 5b) increases with dopant content, likely due to the dominance of the initial total oxidation stage, which extends with increasing dopant levels. Generalizing these results, divalent A-site substitutions in manganates appear to favor total fuel oxidation rather than H2 production.
During the H2O splitting step, oxygen vacancies are eliminated, and Mn2+ is oxidized back to Mn3+. This oxidation appears to be largely independent of A-site dopant content, as does the H2 yield from water splitting, as shown in Figure 3a and Figure 5a. It is possible that the higher Mn2+ content in low-dopant samples is counterbalanced by kinetic effects associated with the greater oxygen deficiency in high-dopant samples.
When Fe3+ partially substitutes for Mn3+, distinct differences in redox behavior are observed. Since the Mn3+→Mn4+ oxidation is thermodynamically favorable at 1000 °C ( Δ G f o 187   k J   mol 1 < 0 ) while Fe3+→Fe4+ oxidation is not ( Δ G f o + 102   k J   m o l 1 > 0 ) , it is reasonable to assume that M n M n remains the primary compensating defect for A-site dopants. However, in this case, reduction involves Mn4+→Mn3+ and the more challenging Fe3+→Fe2+ transition, which favors partial oxidation of the fuel. Consequently, as Fe content increases, total oxygen removal from the material decreases, while H2 production during the reduction step initially increases (Figure 7a).
At a certain Fe concentration, Fe3+ becomes the majority B-site ion, and the Mn3+ content is insufficient to fully compensate for the C a L a defects. At this point Fe4+ formation appears to occur. The presence of Fe4+ in Fe-based perovskites, particularly in A-site doped materials, is well documented in the literature and has been linked to catalytic activity [40,41]. Similar to Mn-based perovskites, Fe4+ → Fe3+ reduction promotes total oxidation, leading to a slight decrease in H2 production, as observed in Figure 7. When Fe fully or nearly fully replaces Mn, the amount of Fe not involved in C a L a compensation increases, and Fe3+ ↔ Fe2+ redox cycling significantly enhances H2 production in both the reduction step and water-splitting steps. These observations suggest that the presence of Ca2+ on A-sites is detrimental to H2 production, and its removal would be beneficial. This is supported by the high H2 yields observed for LaFeO3 in Figure 7 and Figure 8b during both reduction and water splitting.
LaFeO3 also exhibits stability under extended reduction conditions, as indicated by the nearly constant rate of stoichiometric parameter (δ) variation per pulse up to 95 pulses (Figure 9). The amount of H2 produced during water splitting increases with the degree of reduction, as more Fe2+ is produced during Fe3+ → Fe2+ reduction, leading to increased H2 generation during Fe2+ → Fe3+ oxidation with H2O.
Material repeatability was tested over three complete cycles. The reduction step was found to be reproducible even at high pulse numbers, with variations within experimental error. However, H2 production during water splitting declined with cycle number. Since no irreversible phase transformations were detected (Figure 11), this decline is attributed to sintering and surface area loss. Notably, the formation of La(OH)3 and metallic Fe upon reduction, as observed in this study, has not been previously reported in the literature.
Perovskites are ionic solids composed of close-packed O2− ions, and their sintering rate is determined by the mobility of the slowest-moving species. In oxides, this is typically O2−, which diffuses via oxygen vacancies [42]. The strongly reducing conditions during the reduction step promote oxygen vacancy formation, thereby increasing O2− diffusion and, consequently, the sintering rate. The resulting loss of accessible surface area is evident in the SEM images (Figure 12).
Although LaFeO3 and doped LaFeO3 have been reported to exhibit high selectivity for the partial oxidation of CH4, achieving both CH4 conversion and H2 selectivity greater than 90% is relatively rare [26]. Additionally, the production of approximately 10 mmol H2 per complete cycle per gram of oxygen carrier is among the highest reported in the literature [4,26] for chemical looping hydrogen (CLH) processes involving water splitting. Reported H2 production per complete cycle for LaFeO3-based oxygen carriers typically ranges between 2 and 5 mmol H2·g−1 [32,33,43].
The Fe2+ → F3+ redox transition in LaFeO3 has been assumed based on its general redox behavior. However, this is not the only crucial factor; the Fe ion coordination number also significantly influences reaction pathways [27]. Comparative experiments using hematite (Fe2O3) showed that the Fe3+ → Fe2+ reduction favors total CH4 oxidation, as evidenced by the following results after 25 CH4 pulses: Overall CH4 conversion X C H 4 ¯ = 73.5 % , H2 selectivity S H 2 ¯ = 2.8 % and H2 yield Y H 2 ¯ = 2 % , H2 from water splitting 410 μmole g −1. Comparing these results with Table 1 for LaFeO3 suggests that Fe2O3 promotes total oxidation during reduction.
Efforts to enhance LaFeO3’s redox performance have been explored, including structural modifications to improve cycling stability [28,29,33]. A-site substitutions have been found to favor total oxidation [40,44], whereas B-site modifications could further enhance H2 production. Ongoing laboratory experiments indicate promising results when partially substituting Fe with Co.

5. Conclusions

Perovskites, particularly those with the general formula (La1−x(Ca/Sr/)x)(Mn1−yFey)O3, demonstrate significant potential as oxygen carriers for chemical looping hydrogen (CLH) due to their excellent redox properties, structural stability, and tunable oxygen transport capacity. Their performance in hydrogen production is strongly dependent on their composition and defect chemistry.
Substitution of La with Ca or Sr on the A-site of the perovskite structure increases the oxygen transport capacity but also shifts the reaction towards total oxidation of CH4, reducing hydrogen yield. By increasing x from 0 to 0.5 in (La1−xCax)MnO3, the total oxygen delivered by the solid at 900 °C after 25 CH4 pulses increases from 740 to 1940 μmole O2 g−1 while the total H2 selectivity decreases from 52 to 2.5%. Corresponding results for (La1−xSrx)MnO3 (x = 0, 0.5) at 1000 °C were 890 and 1940 μmole O2 g−1 for oxygen delivery and 46% and 14% for H2 selectivity, respectively. As the dopant content increases, the reduction of Mn4+ to Mn3+ enhances oxygen release, but the overall hydrogen production decreases due to the predominance of total oxidation reactions.
Substituting Mn with Fe at the B-site in (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3 improves hydrogen yield and selectivity. When Fe fully replaces Mn in (La0.6Ca0.4)FeO3, a significant increase in hydrogen production and selectivity is observed. The H2 production total selectivity and yield for (La0.6Ca0.4)FeO3 at 1000 °C were, during the 25 CH4 pulse reduction step, 76% and 51%, respectively. They become even higher when Ca is removed from A-sites in LaFeO3, emerging as the best-performing material for H2 production among the tested perovskites, with a corresponding H2 total reduction step selectivity of 98% and yield of 92.5%. These numbers become even higher when the reduction step is prolonged to more than 25 CH4 pulses.
LaFeO3 shows remarkable stability under extended reduction conditions of up to 95 CH4 pulses, maintaining a constant rate of oxygen delivery across multiple reduction cycles. This indicates that LaFeO3 can undergo prolonged reduction without significant degradation, ensuring its potential for long-term applications in chemical looping processes.
Sintering, which leads to a denser structure and loss of surface area, may contribute to a gradual decrease in hydrogen production during the water-splitting step. This phenomenon is most evident in the perovskites after multiple reduction-oxidation cycles.
The results suggest that modifications to the B-site of perovskites, particularly using Fe, could further improve hydrogen production efficiency. Ongoing experiments with Co substitution for Fe in LaFeO3 show promising results, indicating that further optimization could lead to even more efficient materials for CLH applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, V.Z.; methodology, resources, data—curation, validation, A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kim, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.; Ha, J.; Kang, D.; Lee, J.W. Recent Strategies of Oxygen Carrier Design in Chemical Looping Processes for Inherent CO2 Capture and Utilization. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zheng, H.; Jiang, X.; Gao, Y.; Tong, A.; Zeng, L. Chemical looping reforming: Process fundamentals and oxygen carriers. Discov. Chem. Eng. 2022, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, X.; Imtiaz, Q.; Donat, F.; Müller, C.R.; Li, F. Chemical looping beyond combustion-a perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 772–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Das, S.; Biswas, A.; Tiwary, C.S.; Paliwal, M. Hydrogen production using chemical looping technology: A review with emphasis on H2 yield of various oxygen carriers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 28322–28352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, R.; Zeng, J.; Wei, Y.; Chen, Z. Integration of supervised machine learning for predictive evaluation of chemical looping hydrogen production and storage system. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2025, 9, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Voitic, G.; Hacker, V. Recent advancements in chemical looping water splitting for the production of hydrogen. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cho, W.C.; Lee, D.Y.; Seo, M.W.; Kim, S.D.; Kang, K.; Bae, K.K.; Kim, C.H.; Jeong, S.; Park, C.S. Continuous operation characteristics of chemical looping hydrogen production system. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, M.; Qiu, Y.; Ma, L.; Cui, D.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, D.; Xiao, R. Chemical looping hydrogen storage and production: Use of binary ferrite-spinel as oxygen carrier materials. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yüzbasi, N.S.; Armutlulu, A.; Huthwelker, T.; Abdala, P.M.; Müller, R.C. Na-β-Al2O3 stabilized Fe2O3 oxygen carriers for chemical looping water splitting: Correlating structure with redox stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 10692–10700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dueso, C.; Ortiz, M.; Abad, A.; García-Labiano, F.; de Diego, L.F.; Gayán, P.; Adánez, J. Reduction and oxidation kinetics of nickel-based oxygen-carriers for chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 188, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yuan, H.; Huang, Z.; He, F.; Zhang, S. Thermodynamic and experimental investigation on chemical looping hydrogen of alkali lignin pyrolysis gas with NiFe2O4 oxygen carrier. Fuel 2025, 386, 134199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Imtiaz, Q.; Armutlulu, A.; Donat, F.; Müller, C. CuO-based materials for thermochemical redox cycles: The influence of the formation of a CuO percolation network on oxygen release and oxidation kinetics. Disc. Chem. Eng. 2022, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Costa, T.; Gayán, P.; Abad, A.; García-Labiano, F.; de Diego, L.; Melo, D.; Adánez, J. Mn-based oxygen carriers prepared by impregnation for Chemical Looping Combustion with diverse fuels. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 178, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zornoza, B.; Mendiara, T.; Abad, A. Evaluation of oxygen carriers based on manganese-iron mixed oxides prepared from natural ores or industrial waste products for chemical looping processes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 234, 107313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Park, J.; De Santiago, H.A.; Xu, B.; Li, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, L.; Qi, Y.; Luo, J.; Liu, X. Perovskite Oxide Materials for Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production from Water Splitting through Chemical Looping. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 14974–15013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Vos, Y.; Jabobs, M.; Van Der Voort, P.; Van Driessche, I.; Snijkers, F.; Verberckmoes, A. Development of stable oxygen carrier materials for chemical looping processes-A Review. Catalysts 2020, 10, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mattison, T. Materials for Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling. ISRN Chem. Eng. 2013, 2013, 526375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rydén, M.; Leion, H.; Mattison, T.; Lyngfelt, A. Combined oxides as oxygen-carrrier material for chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1924–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arjmand, M.; Kooiman, R.F.; Rydén, M.; Leion, H.; Mattisson, T.; Lyngfelt, A. Sulfur Tolerance of CaxMn1−yMyO3−δ (Μ = Mg, Ti) Perovskite-Type Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU). Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evdou, A.; Zaspalis, V.; Nalbandian, L. La1−xSrxMnO3−δ perovskites as redox materials for the production of high purity hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 5554–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Evdou, A.; Georgitsis, T.; Matsuka, C.; Pacahtouridou, E.; Iliopoulou, E.; Zaspalis, V. Defect Chemistry and Chemical Looping Performance of La1−xMxMnO3 (M = Sr, Ca, (x = 0–0.5)) Perovskites. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Iliopoulou, E.F.; Matsouka, C.; Pachatouridou, E.; Papadopoulou, F.; Psarras, A.; Evdou, A.; Zaspalis, V.; Nalbandian, L. Novel La1−xCa xMnO3 perovskite materials for chemical looping combustion applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 20386–20400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yin, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.; Shen, L. Chemical looping steam methane reforming using Al doped LaMnO3+δ perovskites as oxygen carriers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 33375–33387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Z.; Zheng, K.L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, X.; Wei, Y. Chemical-looping reforming of methane over La-Mn-Fe-O oxygen carriers: Effect of calcination temperature. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 229, 116085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Fang, Y.; Hao, X.; Guan, G. Iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping conversions: A review. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2019, 2, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dawa, T.; Sajjadi, B. Exploring the potential of perovskite structures for chemical looping technology: A state-of-the-art review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2024, 253, 108022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, J.; Bjørgum, E.; Chang, H.; Zhu, K.-K.; Sui, Z.-J.; Zhou, X.-G.; Holmen, A.; Zhu, Y.-A.; Chen, D. On the ensemble requirement of fully selective chemical looping methane partial oxidation over La-Fe-based perovskites. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 301, 120788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, S.; Cheng, Z.; Gun, S.; Qin, L.; Colijn, H.; Mohammad, Z.; Fan, L.-S. Nanoscale structural transformations in LaFeO3 oxygen carriers for enhanced reactivity in chemical looping combustion. Powder Technol. 2024, 444, 1199888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, K.; He, F.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, A.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z. Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous LaFeO3 perovskites for chemical-looping steam reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 3243–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.; Li, Z.; Lu, C.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Gao, J.; Wei, J.; Li, K. Enhanced performance of LaFeO3 oxygen carriers by NiO for chemical looping partial oxidation of methane. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 236, 107396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sastre, D.; Serrano, D.P.; Pizzaro, P.; Coronado, J.M. Chemical insights on the activity of La1−xSrxFeO3 perovskites for chemical looping reforming of methane coupled with CO2-splitting. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 31, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, K.; He, F.; Huang, Z.; Wei, A.; Zheng, H.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Z. Perovskite-type oxides LaFe1−xCoxO3 for chemical looping steam methanne reforming to syngas and hydrogen co-production. Appl. Energy 2016, 168, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, D.; Kim, M.; Lee, J.W. Enhanced redox performance of LaFeO3 perovskite through in-situ exsolution of iridium nanoparticles for chemical looping steam methane reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nalbandian, L.; Evdou, A.; Zaspalis, V. La1−xSrxMyFe1−yO3−δ perovskites as oxygen-carrier materials for chemical looping reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 6657–6670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heuer, S.A.; Schierholz, R.; Alekseev, E.V.; Peters, L.; Mueller, D.N.; Duchoň, T.; Vibhu, V.; Tempel, H.; de Haart, L.G.J.; Kungl, H.; et al. Oxygen Nonstoichiometry and Valence State of Manganese in La1−xCaxMnO3+δ. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 9638–9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goldyreva, E.I.; Leonidov, I.A.; Patrakeev, M.V.; Kozhevnikov, V.L. Oxygen non-stoichiometry and defect equilibria in CaMnO3−δ. J. Sol. St. Electrochem. 2012, 16, 1187–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuo, J.H.; Anderson, H.U. Oxidation-reduction behavior of undoped and Sr-doped LaMnO3: Defect structure, electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power. J. Sol. St. Chem. 1990, 87, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nowotny, J.; Rekas, M. Defect chemistry of (La, Sr)MnO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kröger, F.A. The Chemistry of Imperfect Crystals; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Shen, W. Structural properties and catalytic activity of Sr-substituted LaFeO3 perovskite. Chin. J. Catal. 2012, 33, 1019–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wærnhus, I.; Grande, T.; Wiik, K. Electronic properties of polycrystalline LaFeO3. Part II: Defect modelling including Schottky defects. Sol. St. Ion. 2005, 176, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reijnen, P.J.L. Sintering behavior and microstructures of aluminates and ferrites with spinel structure with regard to deviation from stoichiometry. Sci. Ceram. 1968, 4, 169–188. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee, M.; Lim, H.S.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.W. Enhancement of highly-concentrated hydrogen productivity in chemical looping steam methane reforming using Fe-substituted LaCoO3. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 207, 112507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pecchi, G.; Reyes, P.; Zamora, R.; Campos, C.; Cadus, L.E.; Barbero, B. Effect of the preparation method on the catalytic activity of La1−xCaxFeO3 perovskite-type oxides. Catal. Today 2008, 133–135, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g001
Figure 2. XRD spectra of selected fresh specimens, confirming the presence of the perovskite phase.
Figure 2. XRD spectra of selected fresh specimens, confirming the presence of the perovskite phase.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g002
Figure 3. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle as a function of Ca content; (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Ca content.
Figure 3. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle as a function of Ca content; (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Ca content.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g003
Figure 4. CH4 conversion and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step for LaMnO3 and (La0.5Ca0.5)MnO3.
Figure 4. CH4 conversion and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step for LaMnO3 and (La0.5Ca0.5)MnO3.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g004
Figure 5. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle as a function of Sr content; (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Sr content.
Figure 5. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle as a function of Sr content; (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Sr content.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g005
Figure 6. CH4 conversion and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step for LaMnO3 and (La0.5Sr0.5)MnO3.
Figure 6. CH4 conversion and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step for LaMnO3 and (La0.5Sr0.5)MnO3.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g006
Figure 7. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle in (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn1−xFex)O3 as a function of Fe content (x); (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Fe content (x). At the end of both diagrams, the results for LaFeO3 are shown.
Figure 7. (a) Total amounts of oxygen withdrawn from the solid and hydrogen produced during the reduction and water splitting steps of the cycle in (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn1−xFex)O3 as a function of Fe content (x); (b) Overall CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and selectivity as a function of Fe content (x). At the end of both diagrams, the results for LaFeO3 are shown.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g007
Figure 8. CH4 conversions and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step: (a) for (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3, and (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn0.7Fe0.3)O3; (b) for (La0.6Ca0.4)FeO3 and LaFeO3.
Figure 8. CH4 conversions and H2 yield and selectivity per pulse during the reduction step: (a) for (La0.6Ca0.4)MnO3, and (La0.6Ca0.4)(Mn0.7Fe0.3)O3; (b) for (La0.6Ca0.4)FeO3 and LaFeO3.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g008
Figure 9. Evolution of the atomic oxygen content (“O”), expressed as the stoichiometric parameter δ in LaFeO3−δ, during the reduction and water splitting steps for 25, 50 and 95 reduction pulses.
Figure 9. Evolution of the atomic oxygen content (“O”), expressed as the stoichiometric parameter δ in LaFeO3−δ, during the reduction and water splitting steps for 25, 50 and 95 reduction pulses.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g009
Figure 10. Evolution of the atomic oxygen content (“O”), expressed as stoichiometric parameter δ in LaFeO3−δ, during three consecutive cycles with reduction step involving (a) 25 pulses; (b) 50 pulses.
Figure 10. Evolution of the atomic oxygen content (“O”), expressed as stoichiometric parameter δ in LaFeO3−δ, during three consecutive cycles with reduction step involving (a) 25 pulses; (b) 50 pulses.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g010
Figure 11. LaFeO3 XRD diffraction spectra after the first reduction and after the H2O splitting step of the third cycle for reduction steps involving 25 and 95 CH4 pulses.
Figure 11. LaFeO3 XRD diffraction spectra after the first reduction and after the H2O splitting step of the third cycle for reduction steps involving 25 and 95 CH4 pulses.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g011
Figure 12. SEM images of LaFeO3 specimens: (a,b) macroscopic particle structure of the fresh material; (c,d) higher magnification images showing the microstructure of the various layers of the fresh material; (e,f) macroscopic particle structure of the material after the first cycle; (g,h) higher magnification images showing the microstructure of the various layers of the material after the first cycle.
Figure 12. SEM images of LaFeO3 specimens: (a,b) macroscopic particle structure of the fresh material; (c,d) higher magnification images showing the microstructure of the various layers of the fresh material; (e,f) macroscopic particle structure of the material after the first cycle; (g,h) higher magnification images showing the microstructure of the various layers of the material after the first cycle.
Hydrogen 06 00027 g012
Table 1. Hydrogen production, H2 yields and selectivities of LaFeO3 during the reduction and water splitting steps for reduction steps including 25, 50 and 95 CH4 pulses.
Table 1. Hydrogen production, H2 yields and selectivities of LaFeO3 during the reduction and water splitting steps for reduction steps including 25, 50 and 95 CH4 pulses.
Pulse Nr.255095
Reduction Step
H2 produced
(μmole g−1)
174537397748
X C H 4 ¯ (%)9493.590.5
S H 2 ¯ (%)9899.9%99.9%
Y H 2 ¯ (%)92.59592
Water Splitting Step
H2 produced
(μmole g−1)
70015382059
S H 2 ¯ (%)100%100%100%
Total H2 produced per cycle (μmole g−1)
244552779807
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Evdou, A.; Zaspalis, V. Comparative Evaluation of Various ABO3 Perovskites (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as Oxygen Carrier Materials in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. Hydrogen 2025, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020027

AMA Style

Evdou A, Zaspalis V. Comparative Evaluation of Various ABO3 Perovskites (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as Oxygen Carrier Materials in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. Hydrogen. 2025; 6(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Evdou, Antigoni, and Vassilis Zaspalis. 2025. "Comparative Evaluation of Various ABO3 Perovskites (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as Oxygen Carrier Materials in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production" Hydrogen 6, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020027

APA Style

Evdou, A., & Zaspalis, V. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Various ABO3 Perovskites (A = La, Ca, Sr; B = Mn, Fe) as Oxygen Carrier Materials in Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. Hydrogen, 6(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop