Next Article in Journal
Phosphatidylcholine in Intestinal Mucus Protects against Mucosal Invasion of Microbiota and Consequent Inflammation
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering the Gut–Liver Axis: A Comprehensive Scientific Review of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Understanding Macrophage Complexity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Transitioning from the M1/M2 Paradigm to Spatial Dynamics

by
Forkan Ahamed
,
Natalie Eppler
,
Elizabeth Jones
and
Yuxia Zhang
*
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 1018, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Livers 2024, 4(3), 455-478; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4030033
Submission received: 9 April 2024 / Revised: 28 August 2024 / Accepted: 10 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) encompasses metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver (MASL) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), with MASH posing a risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The global prevalence of MASLD is estimated at approximately a quarter of the population, with significant healthcare costs and implications for liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of MASLD involves intrahepatic liver cells, extrahepatic components, and immunological aspects, particularly the involvement of macrophages. Hepatic macrophages are a crucial cellular component of the liver and play important roles in liver function, contributing significantly to tissue homeostasis and swift responses during pathophysiological conditions. Recent advancements in technology have revealed the remarkable heterogeneity and plasticity of hepatic macrophage populations and their activation states in MASLD, challenging traditional classification methods like the M1/M2 paradigm and highlighting the coexistence of harmful and beneficial macrophage phenotypes that are dynamically regulated during MASLD progression. This complexity underscores the importance of considering macrophage heterogeneity in therapeutic targeting strategies, including their distinct ontogeny and functional phenotypes. This review provides an overview of macrophage involvement in MASLD progression, combining traditional paradigms with recent insights from single-cell analysis and spatial dynamics. It also addresses unresolved questions and challenges in this area.
Keywords: macrophages; diversity; Kupffer cell; monocyte-derived macrophage; spatial dynamics; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) macrophages; diversity; Kupffer cell; monocyte-derived macrophage; spatial dynamics; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahamed, F.; Eppler, N.; Jones, E.; Zhang, Y. Understanding Macrophage Complexity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Transitioning from the M1/M2 Paradigm to Spatial Dynamics. Livers 2024, 4, 455-478. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4030033

AMA Style

Ahamed F, Eppler N, Jones E, Zhang Y. Understanding Macrophage Complexity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Transitioning from the M1/M2 Paradigm to Spatial Dynamics. Livers. 2024; 4(3):455-478. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4030033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahamed, Forkan, Natalie Eppler, Elizabeth Jones, and Yuxia Zhang. 2024. "Understanding Macrophage Complexity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Transitioning from the M1/M2 Paradigm to Spatial Dynamics" Livers 4, no. 3: 455-478. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4030033

APA Style

Ahamed, F., Eppler, N., Jones, E., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Understanding Macrophage Complexity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Transitioning from the M1/M2 Paradigm to Spatial Dynamics. Livers, 4(3), 455-478. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4030033

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop