Next Article in Journal
Wildlife Parasitoids of Citrus Pest (Orange and Lemon Tree) in Mostaganem, Algeria
Previous Article in Journal
Urban Soil Enzyme Activity Restoration with Sandwich Compost
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Investigating the Efficacy of Potassium Silicate and Potassium Sulfate against the Pistachio Psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) under Field Conditions †

1
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran
2
Department of Plant Protection, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)-Khorasan Razavi, Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar 91779-49367, Iran
3
Horticulture Crop Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad 91659-66416, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, 10–25 February 2022; Available online: https://iocag2022.sciforum.net/.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 10(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12206
Published: 10 February 2022

Abstract

:
Pistachio (Pistachio vera L.) is an economically valuable crop, and Iran is among the biggest producers and consumers of this product in the world. The pistachio psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) is one of the most destructive pests of this crop, resulting in severe damage in terms of yield and quality. Therefore, pistachios are subjected to multiple sprayings with various pesticides during the growing season. As pistachio nuts are exported and largely consumed freshly in Iran, investigating zero-pollution strategies such as applying environmentally safe and non-chemical pesticides to control this pest is essential. In this research, the efficacy of potassium silicate and potassium sulfate against A. pistaciae was investigated in a pistachio orchard and compared with some common pesticides, i.e., acetamiprid, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam. The pistachios were sprayed with commercial formulations of each pesticide using their recommended dosage, and with water (control), using a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with three replicates. Populations of A. pistaciae nymphs were evaluated 1 day before and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days following sprayings, by randomly collecting 60 leaves from each treatment. The results showed that all pesticides reached their maximum efficacies (>85%) 3 days after spraying, and no significant differences were observed between the compounds (p = 0.15). Over time, however, the efficacy of pesticides decreased dramatically, and potassium silicate (37.97%) and acetamiprid (14.58%) showed the highest and lowest efficacies, respectively (p < 0.01). Our results suggest acceptable efficacies of potassium silicate and potassium sulfate as environmentally safe compounds against the pistachio psyllid compared to common chemical pesticides.

1. Introduction

Pistachio (Pistachio vera L.) is a tree native to Central Asia, producing edible seeds rich in fatty acids, protein, minerals, and vitamins, which are widely consumed throughout the world [1]. Iran is among the most eminent producers and exporters of this economically valuable crop [2] with a production of 337,815 tons and a harvested area of 12,181 ha in 2019 [3] (FAOSTAT 2019).
The common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt and Lauterer (Hem.: Psyllidae) is a destructive insect pest of pistachio trees that causes serious damage to this crop in all pistachio-producing regions of Iran [4,5]. Adults and nymphs of this pest suck leaf sap and produce large amounts of white powder from dried honeydew. Direct feeding of the pest causes reduced plant growth, defoliation, stunting, falling of fruit buds, and poor yield [6].
Chemical control is the main approach adopted by farmers to control A. psitaciae, and as a result, vast amounts of chemical pesticides, i.e., acetamiprid, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam, are used annually against this insect pest [7,8,9]. Excessive application of these pesticides has led to adverse effects on the health and sustainability of agroecosystems, and to the potential dietary exposure risk for the consumers of pistachio nuts [10,11]. In this regard, investigating zero-pollution approaches through the utilization of environmentally safe and non-chemical pesticides seems crucial.
Potassium silicate (K2SiO3) is a naturally occurring compound and is the potassium salt of silicic acid. In formulation, this compound is readily absorbed by plants and provides suppression of mites, whiteflies, and other insects. It is approved for use on crops, fruits, nuts, turf, and ornamentals [12,13]. Potassium silicate is not expected to have adverse effects on humans or the environment [12]. Potassium sulfate (K2SO4) is also a water-soluble inorganic compound that is used as a fertilizer and insecticide, and is also reported to improve the resistance of plants against sucking pests [14].
In this research, a field trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two non-chemical environmentally safe pesticides—potassium silicate and potassium sulfate—against populations of the pistachio psyllid. Furthermore, these effects were compared with the conventional chemical pesticides acetamiprid, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam.

2. Materials and Methods

Field experiments were performed in 1.5 ha pistachio orchard with 11-year-old pistachio trees of Badami-Sefid cultivar located in Roshtkhar, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran (longitude: 59°13′22″ E; latitude: 34°42′12″ N; altitude: 1145 m). The experimental layout was a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with three replicates, and 10 trees in each block. Treatments consisted of sprayings with recommended dosages of commercial formulations of acetamiprid (Mospilan®; 20% SP; 0.7 g/L; Arman Sabz Adineh Co., Tehran, Iran), imidacloprid (Confidor®; 35% SC; 0.4 g/L; Samiran Co., Tehran, Iran), thiamethoxam (Actara®; 25% WG; 0.4 g/L; Syngenta Co., Basel, Switzerland), potassium silicate (2 g/L; Barafshan Co., Tehran, Iran), potassium sulfate (4 g/L; Héliopotasse Co., Mulhouse, France), and water (control). Sprayings were conducted on 1 August 2020, based on common regional practices, by using a calibrated backpack sprayer (Sam Kubota KF-2202, Japan). Between each plot, one row of pistachio trees was left unsprayed to avoid cross-contamination. All other agricultural practices were conducted under identical conditions in all plots.
Populations of A. pistaciae nymphs were evaluated 1 day before and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days following sprayings by randomly collecting 60 leaves from each treatment. Leaves were collected from all sides of the trees at a height of 1.5 m, placed in plastic bags, and transferred to the laboratory in a cold chamber (4 °C). In the laboratory, nymph populations were calculated under a binocular stereomicroscope.
Effectiveness percentages of each pesticide were calculated and corrected according to the control plots based on the Henderson–Tilton formula (Equation (1)).
Effectiveness   %   =   1     T a   ×   C b T b   ×   C a   ×   100
where Ta and Ca are the number of nymphs in treated and control plots, respectively, after pesticide treatment, and Tb and Cb are the number of nymphs in treated and control plots, respectively, before pesticide treatment.
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and means were compared using Tukey’s HSD method (p < 0.05). All data were analyzed using the SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The results show that initially, at day 1, potassium sulfate (82.95 ± 1.33%), thiamethoxam (80.89 ± 3.35%), and imidacloprid (79.21 ± 5.38%) had the highest efficacies on A. pistaciae nymph populations, while potassium silicate (69.99 ± 2.07%) and acetamiprid (60.68 ± 4.52%) had the lowest efficacies (p < 0.01) (Figure 1).
The highest efficacies of all pesticides (>85%) were achieved after 3 days with no significant difference between the treatments (p > 0.05) (Figure 2).
The efficacies of the pesticides, however, decreased from days 7–21 (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). At day 21, potassium silicate showed the highest efficacy (37.97 ± 1.37%) (p < 0.01), followed by imidacloprid (24.39 ± 0.88), potassium sulfate (22.97 ± 0.88), and thiamethoxam (19.98 ± 0.26). The lowest efficacy at day 21 belonged to acetamiprid (14.58 ± 2.82) (p < 0.01).
Based on our results, the non-chemical pesticides potassium silicate and potassium sulfate showed acceptable initial efficacy against A. pistaciae nymph populations compared to the other chemical compounds. Furthermore, even after 21 days, potassium silicate showed the highest control, which reveals its long-lasting effectiveness against A. pistaciae nymphs. Potassium silicate, alone or in combination with different pesticides, has been shown to have acceptable efficacy against various pests [15,16]. Powders containing silicon (Si) are known to destroy the lipid surface layer of insects such as Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [17]. Furthermore, potassium silicate and other compounds with Si are known to be influential in inducing physical and physiological resistance against pests in plants [18]. Potassium has also been used as a fertilizer and an insecticide, and can enhance plant resistance against insect pests [14].

4. Conclusions

The results of our study reveal statistically equal, or even higher, effectiveness and durability of potassium silicate and potassium sulfate against the nymph populations of A. pistaciae in pistachio orchards, compared to common chemical insecticides. Therefore, the application of these environmentally safe compounds is suggested as an approach towards adopting zero-pollution solutions for controlling insect pests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi) and A.O.T.; methodology, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi) and A.O.T.; software, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi) and M.T.; validation, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi), M.T. and A.O.T.; formal analysis, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi), M.T. and A.O.T.; investigation, E.T. (Ebrahim Tavakoli); resources, E.T. (Ebrahim Tavakoli); data curation, E.T. (Ebrahim Tavakoli); writing—original draft preparation, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi) and E.T. (Ebrahim Tavakoli); writing—review and editing, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi); visualization, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi); supervision, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi), M.T. and A.O.T.; project administration, E.T. (Ehssan Torabi), M.T. and A.O.T.; funding acquisition, A.O.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available in a publicly accessible repository.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Department of Plant Protection of the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)—Khorasan Razavi, Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mozaffari Nejad, A.S. Global pistachio production and marketing challenges in Iran. In International Symposium on Mycotoxins in Nuts and Dried Fruits, 1st ed.; Razzaghi Abyaneh, M., Hokmabadi, H., Abbaspour, H., Eds.; ISHS Acta Horticulturae: Damghan, Iran, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dini, A.; Alizadeh, A.; Alizadeh, E. Assessment of acetamiprid and chlorpyrifos residues on fresh and dried pistachio nuts. Pist. Health J. 2018, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 22 June 2021).
  4. Alizadeh, A.; Talebi, K.; Hosseininaveh, V.; Ghadamyari, M. Metabolic resistance mechanisms to phosalone in the common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae (Hem.: Psyllidae). Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2011, 101, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dehghani-Yakhdani, H.; Iranipour, S.; Mehrnejad, M.R.; Farshbaf-Pourabad, R. The role of iron (Fe) in the population dynamics of pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae (Hemiptera: Aphalaridae) in pistacia orchards. Eur. J. Entomol. 2019, 116, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Alizadeh, A.; Talebi-Jahromi, K.; Hosseininaveh, V.; Ghadamyari, M. Toxicological and biochemical characterizations of AChE in phosalone-susceptible and resistant populations of the common pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae. J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Faraji, M.; Noorbakhsh, R.; Shafieyan, H.; Ramezani, M. Determination of acetamiprid, imidacloprid, and spirotetramat and their relevant metabolites in pistachio using modified QuEChERS combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arabameri, M.; Mohammadi Moghadam, M.; Monjazeb Marvdashti, L.; Mehdinia, S.M.; Abdolshahi, A.; Dezianian, A. Pesticide residues in pistachio nut: A human risk assessment study. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahdavi, V.; Garshasbi, Z.; Farimani, M.M.; Farhadpour, M.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Health risk assessment of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in pistachio using a QuEChERS-based method in combination with HPLC-UV. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2020, 34, 4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cohen, E. Pesticide-mediated homeostatic modulation in arthropods. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 85, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Torabi, E.; Talebi Jahromi, K.; Homayoonzadeh, M.; Torshiz, A.O.; Tavakoli, E. Residue kinetics of neonicotinoids and abamectin in pistachio nuts under field conditions: Model selection, effects of multiple sprayings, and risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 2598–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. US EPA. Biopesticides Registration Action Document (Potassium Silicate); Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 1–28.
  13. Ramírez-Godoy, A.; del Pilar Vera-Hoyos, M.; Jiménez-Beltrán, N.; Restrepo-Díaz, H. Effect of potassium silicate application on populations of Asian citrus psyllid in Tahiti Lime. Hort Technol. 2018, 28, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rahman, A.; Roy, S.; Muraleedharan, N.N.; Phukan, A.K. Effects of potassium chloride and potassium sulphate on the efficacy of insecticides against infestation by Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tea plantations. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2014, 34, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shakir, H.U.; Saeed, M.; Anjum, N.; Farid, A.; Khan, I.A.; Liaquat, M.; Badshah, T. Combined effect of entomopathogenic fungus (Beauveria bassiana), Imidacloprid and potassium silicate against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in rice crop. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2015, 3, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pereira, A.I.A.; da Silva, C.M.; Curvêlo, C.R.; Pontes, N.D.C.; Pereira, J.L.; Tavares, W.D.S.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Luz, J.M.Q. Mixtures between Beauveria bassiana and potassium silicate to manage thrips in tomato plants for industrial processing. Hortic. Bras. 2020, 38, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akbar, W.; Lord, J.C.; Nechols, J.R.; Howard, R.W. Diatomaceous earth increases the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana against Tribolium castaneum larvae and increases conidia attachment. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reynolds, O.L.; Padula, M.P.; Zeng, R.; Gurr, G.M. Silicon: Potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 1 day after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 1 day after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Chemproc 10 00040 g001
Figure 2. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 3 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 3 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Chemproc 10 00040 g002
Figure 3. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 7 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 7 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Chemproc 10 00040 g003
Figure 4. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 14 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 14 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Chemproc 10 00040 g004
Figure 5. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 21 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Figure 5. Average effectiveness (%) of pesticides on A. pistaciae nymph populations 21 days after sprayings. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates. Columns with different letters show a significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.01).
Chemproc 10 00040 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torabi, E.; Tavakoli, E.; Olyaie Torshiz, A.; Taherian, M. Investigating the Efficacy of Potassium Silicate and Potassium Sulfate against the Pistachio Psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) under Field Conditions. Chem. Proc. 2022, 10, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12206

AMA Style

Torabi E, Tavakoli E, Olyaie Torshiz A, Taherian M. Investigating the Efficacy of Potassium Silicate and Potassium Sulfate against the Pistachio Psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) under Field Conditions. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 10(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torabi, Ehssan, Ebrahim Tavakoli, Ali Olyaie Torshiz, and Majid Taherian. 2022. "Investigating the Efficacy of Potassium Silicate and Potassium Sulfate against the Pistachio Psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) under Field Conditions" Chemistry Proceedings 10, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12206

APA Style

Torabi, E., Tavakoli, E., Olyaie Torshiz, A., & Taherian, M. (2022). Investigating the Efficacy of Potassium Silicate and Potassium Sulfate against the Pistachio Psyllid (Agonoscena pistaciae) under Field Conditions. Chemistry Proceedings, 10(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop