Next Article in Journal
Climate Services for Organic Fruit Production in Valencia Region: Early Frost Forecasting
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study of the Effects of Aqueous Micellar Media Formed by Amphiphilic Ionic Liquids and Conventional Surfactants on Reactions of Synthetic Interest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Overcoming Social Barrier to Adoption of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Protein Source for Poultry: How Tall Is the Order? †

by
Nathaniel Siji Olutegbe
* and
Oluwatobi Ojuoluwa
Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, 10–25 February, 2022; Available online: https://iocag2022.sciforum.net/.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 10(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12321
Published: 25 February 2022

Abstract

:
The demand–supply gap for protein has continued to widen globally. Unfortunately, the costs of conventional feed resources are assuming an alarmingly increasing trend in Nigeria, with continued decline being projected for the near future for poultry. Black soldier fly (BSF) is being promoted as a more sustainable alternative due to high protein contents and environmental sustainability prospects. The study examined the acceptability of BSF as a protein source for poultry feed among farmers in the Oyo State, Nigeria. A two-stage technique was used to select 120 medium- and large-scale poultry farmers, and data were collected using structured questionnaires. A short, structured video on BSF was used to control for knowledge. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression (α0.05). The level of perceived benefits was high and included increase in profit margin and reduced transportation cost of waste management. The knowledge level of BSF was high among the majority, just like acceptability (67.2%). Most perceived constraints included the unavailability of land/space and irregular larva production. The average income from poultry, farm size, perceived economic viability, environmental friendliness, total income from other sources, years of experience and perceived constraints were predictors of acceptability of BSF. Therefore, the prospect for social acceptance of BSF in Oyo State is high, devoid of any form of socio-cultural barriers.

1. Introduction

The poultry industry is one of the most important and most prosperous sub-sectors of the livestock industry in Africa. According to FAOSTAT (2018), the Nigerian poultry industry comprises about 180 million birds, the second largest chicken population in Africa after South Africa—producing 650,000 tonnes of eggs and 300,000 tonnes of poultry meat in 2013 [1,2]. Therefore, the poultry industry, if properly harnessed, can also serve as a source of foreign earnings complementing crude oil, which, at present, constitutes the main source of foreign earnings in Nigeria. The most immediate effort needed is the need to at least match the growing rate of the chicken meat production with the growth rate of the human population to provide sufficient dietary protein for as many people as possible. Thus, alternative protein sources for animal feed are required to achieve this balance. Insect protein has recently been acknowledged as a potential protein source and feed ingredient for animal production systems, and black soldier fly (BSF) has been promoted globally and has gained global prominence as a profitable and sustainable protein source alternative.
The BSF is an extremely resistant specie, capable of dealing with demanding environmental conditions, such as drought, food shortage or oxygen deficiency [3]. One major advantage of BSF over other insect species used for biomass production is that the adult does not feed and therefore does not require particular care and is not a potential carrier of diseases. The larvae are sold for pets and fish bait, and they can be easily dried for longer storage [4]. The substantial increase in the market price of both soymeal and fishmeal in the last decade may help make this protein source economically viable for animal feeding. However, despite the high potential this insect portends, there is a generally low level of adoption in Nigeria. One of the key variables for adoption of technologies in the agricultural sector is how such technologies resonate with the people. It is important, therefore, to investigate and isolate the potential social barriers to its adoption as an indicator of its prospect for acceptance and adoption among poultry actors. To this end, the study ascertained farmers’ knowledge of BSF larvae as a protein source for poultry; investigated the perceived benefits of BSF; ascertained the perceived constraints to acceptance/adoption of BSF; assessed the acceptability of BSF larvae as a protein source for poultry feed; and investigated the collective and individual effects of these variables on the acceptance of BSF in the study area.

2. Materials and Methods

A two-stage sampling procedure was employed for this study. The first stage involved a purposive selection of three poultry association zones out of the five in Oyo State due to the high concentration of poultry farmers and prominence of poultry production in Nigeria [5]. These zones were the Ibadan 1, Oyo and Ogbomoso zone. A list of registered poultry farmers was then obtained from the selected zones. A simple random sampling technique was used to select 50% of the respondents from the zone to make a total of 120 respondents for this study. Data were obtained using a structured questionnaire administered through an interview schedule. The perceived benefits and constraints were each measured using a three-point scale reflecting a continuum of importance for benefits (2 = “high”, 1 = “low” and 0 = “not a benefit”) and severity (2 = “severe”, 1 = “mild” and 0 = “not a constraint”) for constraints. The weighted mean, in each case, was computed for items and used to rank them in order of importance and severity for the two respective variables. Knowledge was assessed by presenting respondents with a list of question items representative of the general concept of and technicality around BSF larva production. Options of “yes”, “no” and “I don’t know” were presented, and correct answers were assigned 1 (“yes” or “no”), and incorrect answers (“yes”, “no” or “I don’t know”) were assigned 0. Social acceptance was measured by percentage inclusion in poultry feed for protein. For each of the perceived benefits, constraints, knowledge and acceptability, a score was obtained and used in subsequent analysis, such as categorization (as in the case of knowledge and acceptance) and multiple linear regression, for all variables. Scores were also obtained of the perceived relative advantage (social acceptance, economic viability, environmental friendliness and cultural compatibility), also measured on a three-point scale. These variables were input into the multiple regression model alongside other variables to estimate the collective and individual contributions of these variables to acceptance of BSF among respondents. Data were presented in descriptive statistics such as frequency counts and mean values, while the hypothesis was tested using multiple linear regression at the 5% level of significance.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Socio-Economic Characteristics of Poultry Farmers

The socio-economic characteristics of the respondents show that almost half (44.2%) of the respondents were between 31 and 40 years of age, while 22.5% were between the ages of 41 and 50 years. This implies that the majority of the respondents are active economically. This suggests that most youths in this category have more aspiration for farming than the younger ones. This finding agrees with the findings of Ref [6] that reported a mean age of 44 years for poultry farmers in Nigeria. Additionally, the majority (61.7%) were married, while 10% were single. The result agrees with that of Ref [7], which reported 86% being married and 14% unmarried among poultry farmers. This implies that the married household tends to be more involved in poultry production because they have more responsibilities, and usually, a sizable number of the households tends to render assistance on the farm. About 62% had formal education against 38.3% without formal education. The result of their primary livelihood activities shows that 56.7% were poultry farmers, 20.8% were civil servants, and 17.5% were traders/artisans.

3.2. Distribution of Respondents by Level of Overall Knowledge of BSF as a Protein Source

The result as shown in Table 1 shows that while 79.17% had good knowledge on the general concept of BSF, exactly half (50%) had good knowledge of the technicality involved. Overall, 75.0% had good knowledge of BSF. It is expected that the good knowledge will engender an informed consent (Olutegbe and Ogungbaro, 2020) on the acceptance or otherwise of BSF as an alternative protein source among poultry farmers in the study area.

3.3. Distribution of Respondents on the Perceived Benefits of BSF as a Protein Source

Table 2 below shows the perceived benefits of BSF as a source of protein for poultry feed among farmers. The most highly perceived benefits include an increase in income, reduction in transportation cost of waste and an increase in job opportunities with increased number of BSF farmers. This is in agreement with Ref [8], which maintained that BSF larvae offers new opportunities concerning ecological intensification in rural aqua cultural ecosystems.

3.4. Perceived Constraints of BSF as a Protein Source for Poultry Feed

This result (Table 3) shows the perceived constraints of BSF as a source of protein for poultry feed among farmers. The most perceived constraints include unavailability of land/space (1.99 ± 1.54), irregular larvae production (1.98 ± 1.55) and little product quality control (1.91 ± 1.45). This result is in agreement with the report of Ref [9] that there is unclear regulation and legislation on farming and selling insects for human consumption.

3.5. Acceptance of Black Soildier Fly as a Protein Source in Poultry Feed

Table 4 reveals that the majority of respondents highly accept, i.e., are highly willing to accept BSF as an alternative protein source in poultry. This is an indication of a lack of social and cultural restraints to the adoption of BSF in the poultry industry in Nigeria. This suggests that under an enabling policy environment, BSF will be widely adopted among poultry farmers in the study area and in Nigeria.

3.6. Determinants of Social Acceptance of BSF

Linear regression analysis showing the determinants of adoption of BSF is presented in Table 5. Family size (β = 0.188), income from poultry (β = 0.423), number of birds (β = 0.172), perceived economic viability of BSF (β = 0.499) and perceived environmental friendliness (β = 0.291) contributed positively and significantly to poultry farmers’ acceptance of BSF. This is in line with Refs. [10,11] and [12], which identified education and both off-farm and on-farm income as an important factor for adoption.

4. Conclusions

Based on the findings, the study concludes that the use of black soldier fly, just like in other countries, holds so much promise for the poultry industry in Nigeria if accorded favorable policy consideration. This conclusion is premised on the fact that from the study, the main actors in the poultry value chain, i.e., the producers, display favorable inclination to its adoption—an indication that other actors, including feed mills and consumers, are equally positively disposed to its consideration and inclusion as a protein source in feed formulation. However, there is the need for the agricultural extension and other agro-service organizations to strengthen the know-how capacity of poultry farmers by providing relevant information and skills in such manner so as to allay their fears and pessimisms about the prospects of black soldier fly in the poultry industry in Nigeria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.O. and O.O.; methodology, N.S.O.; validation, N.S.O. and O.O.; formal analysis, N.S.O.; investigation, O.O.; resources, N.S.O. and O.O.; data curation, N.S.O.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.O. and O.O.; writing—review and editing, N.S.O.; supervision, N.S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support this study are available from corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Livestock and Livelihoods Spotlight Cattle and Poultry Sectors NIGERIA Federal Republic of Nigeria Livestock and Livelihoods Spotlight Nigeria; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. AgroNigeria. POULTRY: Nigeria Has 180 Million Birds, Needs No Imports—NVRI—AgroNigeria. Agro Nigeria 2015. Available online: https://agronigeria.ng/poultry-nigeria-has-180-million-birds-needs-no-imports-nvri/ (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  3. Dortmans, B.; Diener, S.; Verstappen, B.; Zurbrügg, C. Black Soldier Fly Biowaste Processing: A Step-by-Step Guide, 1st ed.; Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. van der Poel, A.F.B.; van Krimpen, M.; Veldkamp, T.; Kwakkel, R.P.; der Poel, V. Unconventional protein sources for poultry feeding-opportunities and threats 2013. Unconventional protein sources for poultry feeding: Opportunities and threats. In Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Potsdam, Germany, 26–29 August 2013; pp. 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  5. Olatoye, O.; Ogunsemoyin, O. Prevalence and Antibiotics Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni in Retail Chickens in Oyo State, Nigeria. Food Sci. Qual. Manag. 2016, 48, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yusuf, S.A.; Malomo, O. Technical Efficiency of Poultry Egg Production in Ogun State: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 6, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Olusegun Israel Adesiyan. Technical Efficiency of Poultry Production in Afijio Local Government Area of Oyo state, Nigeria. Dev. Ctry. Stud. 2014, 4, 74–79. Available online: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/DCS/article/viewFile/16238/16638 (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  8. Caruso, D.; Devic, E.; Subamia, W.; Talamond, P.; Baras, E. Technical Handbook of Domestication and Production of Diptera Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Hermetia illucens, Stratiomyidae, 1st ed.; PT Penerbit IPB Press: Bogor, Indonesia, 2013; Available online: https://uved-formation-aquaculture.cirad.fr/content/download/4328/32130/version/3/file/BLACK+SOLDIER+Technical+Handbook.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  9. Lahteenmaki-Uutela, A. European novel food legislation as a restriction to trade. In Proceedings of the 106th Seminar, 25–27 October 2007; Available online: http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa106/7909.html (accessed on 6 January 2022.).
  10. Mignouna, D.B.; Manyong, V.M.; Rusike, J.; Mutabazi, K.D.S.; Senkondo, E.M.M. Determinants of Adopting Imazapyr-Resistant Maize Technologies and its Impact on Household Income in Western Kenya. AgBioForum 2011, 14, 158–163. Available online: https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/12461 (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  11. Namara, R.E.; Weligamage, P.; Barker, R. Prospects for Adopting System of Rice Intensification in Sri Lanka A Socioeconomic Assessment. 2003. Available online: http://www.iwmi.org (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  12. Lavison, R.K. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Organic Fertilizers in Vegetable Production in Accra; University of Ghana: Accra, Ghana, 2013; Available online: http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/5410 (accessed on 23 February 2022).
Table 1. Respondents’ knowledge of BSF (technicality and benefits).
Table 1. Respondents’ knowledge of BSF (technicality and benefits).
Level of Knowledge of BSF (%)Overall
F (%)
General
F (%)
Technical
F (%)
Good (>66%)90 (75%)95 (79.17%)60 (50%)
Fair (34–66%)17 (14.17%)20 (16.67%) 25 (20.83%)
Poor (<34%)13 (10.83%)15 (12.5%)35 (29.17%)
Table 2. Distribution of respondents on perceived benefits of BSF as a protein source for poultry feed in Oyo State.
Table 2. Distribution of respondents on perceived benefits of BSF as a protein source for poultry feed in Oyo State.
VariablesMean ± SDRank
Loans and credits are easily accessed when the number of BSF users and farmers increases1.15 ± 0.389th
Increase in accessibility to protein source in formation of feed1.17 ± 0.448th
Low cost of feed1.33 ± 0.617th
Increased egg production1.40 ± 0.676th
Increase in profit margin1.48 ± 0.771st
Reduction in transportation cost of waste1.42 ± 0.742nd
Improved farmer and household wellbeing1.40 ± 0.694th
Rescue for the poultry industry due to the hike in feed and feed materials1.37 ± 0.695th
Job opportunities increase1.38 ± 0.723rd
Source: Field survey, 2021.
Table 3. Distribution of respondents on the perceived constraints of BSF as a protein source for poultry feed among farmers in Oyo State.
Table 3. Distribution of respondents on the perceived constraints of BSF as a protein source for poultry feed among farmers in Oyo State.
VariablesMean ± SDRank
Lack of technical know-how in handling BSF production1.30 ± 0.5610th
Unavailability of labor1.54 ± 0.588th
Legal limitations regarding the use of certain substrates for the larvae and trade restrictions1.55 ± 0.637th
Low degree of efficiency or even risk of system failure due to unskilled personnel1.45 ± 0.599th
Difficulty in credit and loan procurement processes1.58 ± 01.306th
Unavailability of land/space1.99 ± 1.541st
Irregular larvae production1.98 ± 1.552nd
Little product quality control1.90 ± 1.453rd
Little control over hygiene standards1.81 ± 1.575th
Inadequate marketing1.86 ± 1.994th
Source: Field survey, 2021.
Table 4. Distribution of respondents’ acceptance (willingness to adopt) of BSF as a source of protein for poultry feed among farmers.
Table 4. Distribution of respondents’ acceptance (willingness to adopt) of BSF as a source of protein for poultry feed among farmers.
Level of AcceptanceFrequencyPercentage
Not accepted2215.5
Low (33% inclusion or below)107.0
Moderate (34.0–66.0%)2114.8
High (>66% inclusion)8962.7
Source: Field survey, 2021.
Table 5. Table determinants of acceptability of BSF among poultry farmers.
Table 5. Table determinants of acceptability of BSF among poultry farmers.
ModelStandardized Coefficient (β)t-Valuep-ValueDecision
Constant 9.2660.000
Age0.1291.5170.132Not Significant
Family Size0.1882.7320.007Significant
Income from poultry average monthly0.4234.2980.000Significant
Total income from other sources−0.293−3.7320.000Significant
Poultry farming experience (Year)−0.321−37680.000Significant
Christian0.0400.6010.549Not Significant
Married−0.111−1.7260.087Not Significant
Educated−0.084−1.3890.168Not Significant
Farm size0.1722.1160.037Significant
Perceived benefits−0.041−0.5960.553Not Significant
Constraints−0.232−2.7940.006Significant
Perceived social acceptability−0.054−0.4830.630Not Significant
Perceived economic viability0.4994.3260.000Significant
Perceived cultural compatibility0.0390.4110.682Not Significant
Perceived environmental friendliness0.2912.2280.028Significant
Knowledge scores—general0.0800.8190.414Not Significant
Knowledge scores—technical0.1071.0350.303Not Significant
Source: Field survey, 2021.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olutegbe, N.S.; Ojuoluwa, O. Overcoming Social Barrier to Adoption of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Protein Source for Poultry: How Tall Is the Order? Chem. Proc. 2022, 10, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12321

AMA Style

Olutegbe NS, Ojuoluwa O. Overcoming Social Barrier to Adoption of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Protein Source for Poultry: How Tall Is the Order? Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 10(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olutegbe, Nathaniel Siji, and Oluwatobi Ojuoluwa. 2022. "Overcoming Social Barrier to Adoption of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Protein Source for Poultry: How Tall Is the Order?" Chemistry Proceedings 10, no. 1: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12321

APA Style

Olutegbe, N. S., & Ojuoluwa, O. (2022). Overcoming Social Barrier to Adoption of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as a Protein Source for Poultry: How Tall Is the Order? Chemistry Proceedings, 10(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12321

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop