Abstract
The search for new antibacterial drugs has continued to be an urgent matter. One of the approaches is the development of covalent inhibitors using biochemoinformatics at the initial stages. In this work, structures of a few plant-derived substances with electrophilic unsaturated carbonyl and structures of small synthetic compounds suitable for fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) with -CH2-Br group were selected as ligands for sets of structures of bacterial proteins. The theoretical assessment was carried out using the Autodock Vina program for calculation and FYTdock for the organization of the process and the analysis of results. Natural Ixerine D as well as synthetic 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan demonstrated the most promising results as potential Cys-targeted inhibitors.
1. Introduction
Natural antibiotics, their derivatives, and synthetic antimicrobials are the primary tools to treat bacterial infections. A number of bacteria have developed resistance to many or even all such currently available drugs, hindering the treatment of these diseases. Therefore, the search for new antibacterial drugs does not cease to be an urgent scientific task. One of the approaches to creating therapeutic agents is the development of covalent inhibitors. The initial stages of any modern drug design company include the use of modern methods of biochemoinformatics, in particular, molecular docking, i.e., computing of ligand-protein complexes with an assessment of their geometry and affinity [1,2,3].
In this work, ~20 structures of plant-derived electrophilic substances from the Pubchem database were selected as ligands as well as some structures suitable for the fragment-based ligand design approach (FBDD—Fragment-based drug discovery) containing the electrophilic fragment -CH2-Br. The electrophilic nature of the phytochemicals and the fragments provide a possibility of covalent medication of nucleophilic atoms of Cys and His residues in proteins. In this work, the possibility was additionally evaluated in silico using the Autodock Vina program for docking simulations and FYTdock [4] to organize, run, and analyze the docking results.
2. Materials and Methods
For molecular docking, AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 was used (docking area 4 × 4 × 4 nm in the center of the protein, step 0.1 nm, the exhaustiveness parameter was 12, and five models were calculated). Preparation of ligand and protein files and visualization of the results were performed using the MGL Tools software package (The Scripps research lab.). To automate the organization, run calculations using the Autodock Vina program, and analyze the results obtained, we used the original FYTdock assistant program [4]. As ligands, we chose three structures of compounds constructed by us using the FBDD approach (Fragment-based drug discovery): 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan, 2-bromo-1-(4-(nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone, 2-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide, and a library of ~20 structures of plant-derived substances created using the Pubchem database taking into account their growth in the territory of the Republic of Belarus. Approximately 2900 protein structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 500 random protein structures of some other bacterial species were selected to create a library of bacterial protein structures from the Protein Data Bank. Docking results were initially collected and processed using FYTdock software as an Excel spreadsheet showing binding energies, amino acid environment, protein ligand-amino acid interactions, protein-ligand complexes. The result was taken into account if the value of Ebind was no more than −6.0 kcal/mol and the distance from the electrophilic fragment of the ligand structure to the sulfur atom of the thiol group of cysteine residues in the protein-ligand complexes obtained in silico did not exceed each 0.45 nm (distance criterion). For a graphical representation of the result, the Biovia program was used.
3. Results
Fortunately, it was found that Ixerin D (Pubchem database number CID101553163) from dandelion, a common and widely grown plant, demonstrated a number of interactions with high affinity and the location of its electrophilic fragment within 0.4 nm from the sulfur atom of the cysteine of Mtb proteins, lipoyl synthase, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, and beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Table 1.
The proteins from protein-ligand complexes were an electrophilic carbon of the Ixerin D located within 0.4 nm from the sulfur atom of a cysteine residue and their binding energies.
Figure 1.
The calculated position of ligand Ixerin D inside of Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins: (a) Lipoyl synthase (PDB code: 5EXI); (b) The catalytic domain of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (PDB code: 4ZQR).
This compound is a metabolite of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and is probably of low toxicity to humans due to the use of parts of this plant as food or medicine by humans and some animals. The beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III is very important for fatty acid biosynthesis and for the normal life cycle of Mtb [5]. Such calculated and theoretical data indicate the possibility of a favorable outcome of the biological testing of Ixerin D, and it can be obtained from a natural source, which does not make it necessary to develop a scheme for its chemical synthesis.
For the synthetic ligand 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan, compiled using the FBDD approach, the -CH2-Br fragment was found to be located close to the cysteine sulfur atom in Sortase B from Staphylococcus aureus, a human pathogen [6], E. coli Gsp amidase, which regulates the redox state of E. coli cells [7], β-lactamase S70C BlaC from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which contributes to the development of the bacteria natural resistance to β-lactam antibiotics [8] (Table 2).
Table 2.
The proteins from protein-ligand complexes where an electrophilic fragment of the 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan located near the sulfur atom of a cysteine residue and their binding energies.
It is important to note that, despite the localization of the electrophilic fragment of the ligand near cysteine, definitely these ligand-receptor interactions can be hindered due to geometrical features and energetically favorable location of the ligand in the protein. The 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan showed interactions with high affinity and favorable location of the -CH2-Br fragment for covalent binding with the following bacterial proteins: E. coli bifunctional glutathionylspermidine synthetase/amidase and E. coli K-12 methionine aminopeptidase with binding energies of −8.3 kcal/mol and −7.0 kcal/mol, respectively (Table 3 and Figure 2). These enzymes are potential new drug targets, and inhibitors of these enzymes may be useful as prototypes of new antibacterial agents [9,10].
Table 3.
The proteins from protein-ligand complexes where an electrophilic fragment of 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan located within 0.4 nm from the sulfur atom of a cysteine residue and their binding energies.
Figure 2.
The calculated position of ligand 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan inside of bacterial proteins: (a) E. coli Bifunctional glutathionylspermidine synthetase/amidase (PDB code: 2ioa); (b) E. coli K-12 methionine aminopeptidase (PDB code: 2gg7).
The compound 2-bromo-1-(4-(nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone had the orientation of the -CH2-Br fragment near the C37L/C151T/C442A histidine of the CYP51 triple mutant from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Microcin-processing metalloprotease TldD/E from E. coli, CYP134A1 with a closed-loop substrate binding from Bacillus subtilis and other bacterial proteins with binding energies from −6.7 to −9.0 kcal/mol (Table 4 and Figure 3).
Table 4.
The proteins from protein-ligand complexes where an electrophilic fragment of 2-bromo-1-(4-(nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone located within 0.4 nm from the sulfur atom of a cysteine residue and their binding energies.
Figure 3.
Calculated position of ligand 2-bromo-1-(4-(nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone near bacterial proteins: (a) Crystal structure analysis of the C37L/C151T/C442A-triple mutant of CYP51 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (PDB code: 1u13); (b) E. coli Microcin-processing metalloprotease TldD/E (PDB code: 5nj5).
The ligand of 2-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide bound only to the mutant heme domain A264C of cytochrome P450 BM3 from E. coli (PDB code: 3EKB) with localization of the bromine atom of the compound close to cysteine (CYS264) and binding energy of −6.0 kcal/mol (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Calculated position of ligand 2-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide near A264C mutant heme domain of cytochrome P450 BM3 from E. coli (PDB code: 3EKB).
4. Conclusions
Based on in silico molecular docking, natural compound Ixerin D from common dandelion, as well as synthetic ligands, 4-(4-(2-bromoethyl)piperazin-1-yl)-7-nitrobenzofurazan, 2-bromo-1-(4-(nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethenone, and 2-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide, fragments for structures of new covalent molecular tools or drugs, were identified to be able to covalently modified inhibitors of various bacterial proteins with localization of their electrophilic fragments within 0.4 nm from functional amino acid fragments. Residues and binding energy in the range from −6.0 to −10.7 kcal/mol. Thus, the results substantiate perspectives of experimental studies of these ligands as potential antibacterial agents or molecular tools with covalent modifier properties.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.F., P.Y. and V.S. (Viktoryia Staravoitava); writing—original draft preparation, P.Y. and V.S. (Viktoryia Staravoitava); writing—review and editing, Y.F., P.Y. and V.S. (Viktoryia Staravoitava); supervision, V.S. (Vladimir Shkumatov). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by governmental grants of republic of Belarus No. of registration 20210560.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Kibou, Z.; Aissaoui, N.; Daoud, I.; Seijas, J.A.; Vázquez-Tato, M.P.; Khelil, N.K.; Choukchou-Braham, N. Efficient Synthesis of 2-Aminopyridine Derivatives: Antibacterial Activity Assessment and Molecular Docking Studies. Molecules 2022, 27, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faletrov, Y.; Brzostek, A.; Plocinska, R.; Dziadek, J.; Rudaya, E.; Edimecheva, I.; Shkumatov, V. Uptake and Metabolism of Fluorescent Steroids by Mycobacterial Cells. Steroids 2017, 117, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faletrov, Y.V.; Karpushenkova, V.S.; Zavalinich, V.A.; Yakovets, P.S.; Shkredava, A.D.; Shkumatov, V.M. Interaction of Nitrobenzoxadiazole Derivatives of Piperazine and Aniline with Bovine Serum Albumine in Silico and in Vitro. J. Belarusian State Univ. Chem. 2021, 2, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faletrov, Y.V.; Staravoitava, V.A.; Dudko, A.R.; Shkumatov, V.M. Application of Docking-Based Inverse High Throughput Virtual Screening to Found Phytochemical Covalent Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease, NSP12 and NSP16. 2022; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachdeva, S.; Reynolds, K.A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis β-Ketoacyl Acyl Carrier Protein Synthase III (mtFabH) Assay: Principles and Method. In New Antibiotic Targets. Methods In Molecular Medicine™; Champney, W.S., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; Volume 142, pp. 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zong, Y.; Mazmanian, S.K.; Schneewind, O.; Narayana, S.V.L. The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase That Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus Aureus Cell Wall. Structure 2004, 12, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiang, B.-Y.; Chen, T.-C.; Pai, C.-H.; Chou, C.-C.; Chen, H.-H.; Ko, T.-P.; Hsu, W.-H.; Chang, C.-Y.; Wu, W.-F.; Wang, A.H.-J.; et al. Protein S-Thiolation by Glutathionylspermidine (Gsp). J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 25345–25353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tassoni, R.; Blok, A.; Pannu, N.S.; Ubbink, M. New Conformations of Acylation Adducts of Inhibitors of β-Lactamase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pai, C.-H.; Chiang, B.-Y.; Ko, T.-P.; Chou, C.-C.; Chong, C.-M.; Yen, F.-J.; Chen, S.; Coward, J.K.; Wang, A.H.-J.; Lin, C.-H. Dual Binding Sites for Translocation Catalysis by Escherichia coli Glutathionylspermidine Synthetase. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 5970–5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evdokimov, A.G.; Pokross, M.; Walter, R.L.; Mekel, M.; Barnett, B.L.; Amburgey, J.; Seibel, W.L.; Soper, S.J.; Djung, J.F.; Fairweather, N.; et al. Serendipitous Discovery of Novel Bacterial Methionine Aminopeptidase Inhibitors. Proteins 2006, 66, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).