Next Article in Journal
DFT Studies on Physicochemical Properties and Spectral Data of 2-Thiophene Carboxylic Acid Thiourea Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Hydro-Lipophilic Properties of Chlorinated and Brominated 1-Hydroxynaphthalene-2-Carboxanilides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: Enhancing Biomarker Analysis and Diagnostic Precision †

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 28th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-28), 15–30 November 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ecsoc-28.
Chem. Proc. 2024, 16(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20206
Published: 14 November 2024

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and memory impairment. Early and accurate detection of AD is crucial for timely intervention and effective treatment. Biomarkers such as amyloid-beta and tau proteins, genetic markers like the APOE genotype, and neuroimaging findings are essential for AD diagnosis and prognosis, but their complex interactions require advanced analytical tools. AI has emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare, offering advanced computational techniques to analyze complex biomarker data with enhanced precision. This review paper explores the advancements in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. In the paper, we discuss the importance of diagnosing AD accurately and the potential benefits of using AI techniques for the early and accurate detection of AD. We emphasize the significance of AI in optimizing biomarker analysis for AD detection, discussing the challenges in their implementation and future implications. AI technologies can transform AD detection by significantly improving diagnostic imaging techniques, identifying key biomarkers, and standardizing the analysis of complex neuroimaging data. In this paper, we also highlight the critical role of AI in addressing challenges associated with integrating new technologies into clinical practice and providing effective solutions for consistent and reliable AD detection techniques.

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the most prevalent cause of dementia accounting for an estimated 60–80% of cases [1,2]. AD often initiates with a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage characterized primarily by memory loss, followed by a gradual decline that encompasses behavioral issues and reduced self-care. The disease develops very slowly, and the resulting changes are irreversible. Prodrome diagnosis of AD, especially in MCI state, is especially crucial so that one can take therapeutic measures and delay the disease progression. MCI is a transitional stage between normal cognitive aging and more serious conditions like dementia. MCI includes several types: amnestic MCI (aMCI), primarily affecting memory; early MCI (eMCI), characterized by subtle cognitive changes; late MCI (lMCI), involving more pronounced deficits; and non-amnestic MCI, which impacts other cognitive functions. Additionally, subjective cognitive decline (SMC) refers to self-reported cognitive concerns without measurable impairment [3]. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for diagnosis and prognosis, informing treatment strategies [4]. Pathological abnormalities, such as amyloid plaques, can form 10–20 years prior to cognitive dysfunction and significant nerve cell loss [5]. They affect the central nervous system (CNS) through the excessive accumulation of protein fragment β-amyloid and an abnormal form of the protein tau plaques [1]. This accumulation is followed by neurodegeneration, which causes structural changes and a loss of functional connectivity and damage to other brain cells. Additionally, there are alterations in reactive processes, including neuroinflammation and changes in plasticity, which are associated with oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [1]. Another brain change linked to Alzheimer’s disease is atrophy, characterized by a reduction in brain volume due to neurodegeneration and other factors [2]. Figure 1 illustrates AD progression in brain. Detecting AD at its onset enables timely intervention with medications and lifestyle adjustments that may slow progression and enhance quality of life and prevent fatality. It also aids in planning for future care, differentiates AD from other cognitive disorders, and allows for access to support resources and clinical trials [3,4,5,6,7,8].

1.2. Role of Biomarkers in AD

Biomarkers play a critical role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of AD [9,10]. Biomarkers can be defined as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention” [11]. They provide measurable indicators of biological processes, enabling early detection and monitoring of disease progression. The development of early and reliable diagnostic markers is essential for detecting the disease sooner, enabling preventive actions to prevent further neuronal damage [3,4,5].

1.3. AI in Healthcare

AI has emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare, offering innovative computational techniques to analyze complex biomarker data with enhanced precision. It has demonstrated a significant potential in enhancing the detection and diagnosis of AD by identifying intricate patterns in large datasets and analyzing large volumes of genetic, imaging, and clinical data generated during neurodegenerative disease research [11,12,13]. AI techniques like deep learning and natural language processing have transformed healthcare, leveraging datasets such as ADNI, NACC, and OASIS. ADNI enables predictive modeling in Alzheimer’s disease through neuroimaging and biomarker data, while NACC and OASIS provide extensive clinical and imaging resources for studying neurodegenerative diseases. These tools enhance diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. AI can optimize biomarker analysis, enhance neuroimaging techniques, and provide more consistent and reliable diagnostic solutions [14,15]. The rapid increase in computational power, along with advancements in AI, has opened up new possibilities for analyzing complex medical data, such as neuroimaging scans and biomarker profiles [16]. In this review, we discuss the AI techniques that can be utilized to enhance biomarker analysis and improve diagnostic precision with respect to AD.

2. Biomarkers in AD

Neuroimaging techniques, including imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, play a crucial role in detecting structural brain changes and visualizing pathological features like amyloid-β plaques and tau tangles [1,3,5]. These techniques help identify the characteristic patterns of brain atrophy and protein accumulation associated with AD [17,18]. CSF analysis can also reveal biomarkers related to AD pathology, providing further evidence to support a diagnosis [19]. Blood-based biomarkers are being developed to provide a less invasive diagnostic option [3,4]. Genetic testing, such as for the APOE ε4 variant, can indicate an increased risk of AD but is not used in isolation for diagnostic purposes. A summary of traditional biomarkers is given in Table 1 [1,3,11,18].

3. Recent Advances in AI Techniques for Biomarker Analysis

Machine learning involves creating algorithms and statistical models that let computers learn from experience and become better at completing tasks. Deep learning can perform classification tasks on images, text, or sound by using large datasets and multi-layered neural networks [20,21]. DL models consist of multiple layers of neurons which are trained on large datasets of images to learn patterns and features that are useful for image analysis. DL models can automatically learn relevant features from the data [12,14]. Transfer learning is another algorithm which is used in AD detection where a model developed for a specific task is adapted for a different but related task. Instead of training a new model, which requires substantial data and computational resources, transfer learning leverages the knowledge gained from a pre-trained model. Figure 2 illustrates the algorithms used for diagnosis of AD.

3.1. AI in Imaging Biomarkers

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are two medical imaging techniques that are widely used for the early detection of AD [20]. A review of neuroimaging approaches and AI methods for early detection has been covered in [14]. In [20], prospective F-FDG PET brain scans have been employed to train a 48-layer deep convolutional neural network named InceptionV3. Mehmood et al. [21] employed MRI images with a pre-trained VGG convolutional neural network, achieving high accuracy in distinguishing AD patients from healthy controls. A computational method for diagnosing AD from brain MRI scans proposed in [22] is a combination of Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) for tissue segmentation. It also employs extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) with a support vector machine (SVM) for classifying Alzheimer’s disease based on the segmented tissues. Popuri [23] proposed a novel biomarker using MRI-based features to measure neurodegeneration. Choi et al. [24] developed a CNN system that accurately predicts cognitive decline in MCI patients using PET images. The model achieved 84.2% accuracy in predicting MCI to AD conversion.

3.2. AI in Cerebrospinal Fluid(CSF) Biomarkers

CSF biomarkers are promising for Alzheimer’s diagnosis but involve an invasive lumbar puncture, which can be uncomfortable and carries some risk. The test’s cost and availability may also limit its use [25,26,27]. Ref. [15] discusses the use of automated platforms for assessing core AD biomarkers in CSF. The study compares two large cohorts of patients with various neurological disorders and applies unsupervised Gaussian mixture models to classify patients based on their CSF biomarker profiles. The findings suggest that automated assays and unsupervised machine learning approaches can help in the biochemical profiling of neurological disorders and improve diagnostic protocols. Diagnostic guidelines include CSF levels of amyloid-beta, total tau protein, p-tau [28,29,30].

3.3. AI in Blood-Based Biomarkers

Brain-derived biomarkers are generally found in lower concentrations in blood compared to CSF primarily due to the blood–brain barrier, which restricts the free movement of substances between the central nervous system and the bloodstream. Advances have been made to enhance the analytical sensitivity of these methods [14]. It has been discovered that combining blood bio-marker detection with imaging markers may help enhance the accuracy of AD diagnosis [25]. Blood-based data are emerging as a promising non-invasive biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Generated through omics techniques, these data are complex, high-dimensional, and voluminous, making manual analysis difficult. Ref. study [26] explores the use of AI to identify small sets of blood transcripts that can differentiate between healthy individuals and those with AD. The combination of DL models with imaging from blood samples to investigate AD has been suggested in [27], where the authors concluded that a robust deep learning pipeline, which incorporates positive and bias control models along with visualization techniques, is valuable for validating the results of deep learning models.

3.4. AI in Genetic Biomarkers

By integrating genetic data with other types of omics information, such as transcriptomics and proteomics, AI provides a comprehensive view of the biological pathways involved in AD, enabling the identification of novel genetic biomarkers associated with early disease onset [12]. APOE ε4 is a key genetic biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with its risk association varying by genotype. Individuals with two ε4 alleles (ε4/ε4) have a significantly higher risk than those with one ε4 allele combined with an ε3 allele (ε4/ε3). Additionally, the presence of the ε2 allele (ε2/ε4 or ε2/ε3) appears to confer some protective effects against AD. Understanding these combinations is crucial for risk assessment and research. By processing genetic data in real time, AI improves the detection of early biomarkers and supports personalized treatment strategies, thereby advancing the early diagnosis and management of AD [6]. This integration of AI and genetic biomarkers enhances the accuracy of early diagnosis and supports the development of personalized treatment strategies by identifying individuals at higher risk [6,14].

4. Enhancing Diagnostic Precision and Advances in AD Monitoring Using AI

The data produced by non-invasive methods are highly complex due to noise, large volume, high dimensionality, and variability [12]. Analyzing thousands of MRI or PET images presents a level of computational complexity that simple methods cannot handle [14]. Blood screening data include omics measurements with an exceptionally high number of samples and features. This complexity makes it challenging to analyze and interpret using traditional statistical methods. Table 2 gives a summary of various AI techniques that can be used for biomarker analysis. AI techniques can help to identify patterns in data and generate predictive models that can assist in the early and accurate detection of AD.
Table 2. Summary of various AI techniques that can be used for biomarker analysis.
Table 2. Summary of various AI techniques that can be used for biomarker analysis.
CategoryBiomarkerTechniqueReferences
MRIGrey matter volumeVGG (CNN);
Segmentation: GMM and CNN models;
Classification: XGBoost and SVM;
Novel biomarker based on MRI
[14,21,22,23]
PETAmyloid-beta
deposition
(InceptionV3) CNN;
Ensemble model;
Imaging analysis using CNN
[14,20,24]
Amyloid-beta (Aβ42)Gaussian mixture models;
Automated assays;
Unsupervised learning
[15]
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkersTotal tau
(t-tau)
Gaussian mixture models;
Automated assays;
Unsupervised learning
[15]
Phosphorylated tau (p-tau)Gaussian mixture models;
Automated assays;
Unsupervised learning
[15]
Amyloid-beta
(Aβ42 and Aβ40)
CNN on imaging blood samples
VGG-16 and Inceptionv3
[14,25,26,27]
Blood-based biomarkersTau proteins
(t-tau and p-tau)
CNN on imaging blood samples
VGG-16 and Inceptionv3
[14,25,26,27]
Neurofilament light chain (NFL)Regression models;
Neural networks;
Ensemble methods
[14,25,26,27]
Genetic
biomarkers
APOE genotype (APOE ε4)CNN;
Supervised learning methods
[6,12,14]

5. Conclusions

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) is set to revolutionize Alzheimer’s disease (AD) detection by enhancing biomarker analysis and diagnostic precision. Early and accurate diagnosis of AD is essential for improving patient quality of life through timely preventative measures. To achieve this, there is a growing need to identify and utilize AI-based biomarkers that can detect early cognitive deviations indicative of AD. As non-invasive technologies advance and more data are generated, the role of AI will become increasingly pivotal. AI technologies have demonstrated a significant potential in enhancing the detection and diagnosis of AD by identifying intricate patterns in large datasets that may elude traditional analysis methods. By combining these computational tools with non-invasive, as well invasive, biomarker approaches, we can expect significant improvements in the early detection and diagnosis of AD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G. and Z.I.; methodology, Z.I.; resources, Z.I.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.I.; writing—review and editing, R.G. and Z.I.; supervision, Z.I.; project administration, R.G. and Z.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ausó, E.; Gómez-Vicente, V.; Esquiva, G. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Early Diagnosis. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2024. Available online: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  3. 3. Dulewicz, M.; Kulczy’nska-Przybik, A.; Mroczko, P.; Kornhuber, J.; Lewczuk, P.; Mroczko, B. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease in Clinical Practice: The Role of CSF Biomarkers during the Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mikuła, E. Recent Advancements in Electrochemical Biosensors for Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers Detection. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 4049–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Counts, S.E.; Ikonomovic, M.D.; Mercado, N.; Vega, I.E.; Mufson, E.J. Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kodam, P.; Sai Swaroop, R.; Pradhan, S.S.; Sivaramakrishnan, V.; Vadrevu, R. Integrated multi-omics analysis of Alzheimer’s disease shows molecular signatures associated with disease progression and potential therapeutic targets. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davtyan, H.; Zagorski, K.; Rajapaksha, H.; Hovakimyan, A.; Davtyan, A.; Petrushina, I.; Kazarian, K.; Cribbs, D.H.; Petrovsky, N.; Agadjanyan, M.G.; et al. Alzheimer’s disease Advax(CpG)-adjuvanted Multi-TEP-based dual and single vaccines induce high-titer antibodies against various forms of tau and Aβ pathological molecules. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Puttagunta, M.; Ravi, S. Medical image analysis based on deep learning approach. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 24365–24398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, H.; Zhu, X.-C.; Jiang, T.; Yu, J.-T.; Tan, L. Body fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015, 3, 70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001, 69, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Giovanni, B.; Antonio, I.; Davide, C.; Emanuela, M.; Federico, P.P.; Lorenzo, G.; Silvia, P.; Maya, P.; Fabrizio, T.; Giorgio, G.; et al. Machine Learning Driven Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid Core Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neurological Disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 647783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Q.; Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. A Survey of Deep Learning for Alzheimer’s Disease. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2023, 5, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, T. Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2023, 308, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Shanmugavadivel, K.; Sathishkumar, V.E.; Cho, J.; Subramanian, M. Advancements in computer-assisted diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A comprehensive survey of neuroimaging methods and AI techniques for early detection. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023, 91, 102072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cummings, J. The Role of Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Development. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1118, 29–61. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Saleem, T.J.; Zahra, S.R.; Wu, F.; Alwakeel, A.; Alwakeel, M.; Jeribi, F.; Hijji, M. Deep Learning-Based Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Niemantsverdriet, E.; Valckx, S.; Bjerke, M.; Engelborghs, S. Alzheimer’s disease CSF biomarkers: Clinical indications and rational use. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2017, 117, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Janeiro, M.H.; Ardanaz, C.G.; Sola-Sevilla, N.; Dong, J.; Cortés-Erice, M.; Solas, M.; Puerta, E.; Ramírez, M.J. Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Lab. Med. 2021, 2, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, R.; Wang, X.; Lawler, K.; Garg, S.; Bai, Q.; Alty, J. Applications of artificial intelligence to aid early detection of dementia: A scoping review on current capabilities and future directions. J. Biomed. Inform. 2022, 217, 104030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ding, Y.; Sohn, J.H.; Kawczynski, M.G.; Trivedi, H.; Harnish, R.; Jenkins, N.W.; Lituiev, D.; Copeland, T.P.; Aboian, M.S.; Mari Aparici, C.; et al. A deep learning model to predict a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease by using 18F-FDG PET of the brain. Radiology 2019, 290, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mehmood, A.; Yang, S.; Feng, Z.; Wang, M.; Ahmad, A.S.; Khan, R.; Maqsood, M.; Yaqub, M. A transfer learning approach for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease on MRI images. Neuroscience 2021, 460, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tuan, T.A.; Pham, T.B.; Kim, J.Y.; Tavares, J.M.R. Alzheimer’s diagnosis using deep learning in segmenting and classifying 3D brain MR images. Int. J. Neurosci. 2022, 132, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Popuri, K.; Balachandar, R.; Alpert, K.; Lu, D.; Bhalla, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Hsiung, R.G.; Wang, L.; Beg, M.F.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Development and validation of a novel dementia of Alzheimer’s type (DAT) score based on metabolism FDG-PET imaging. NeuroImage Clin. 2018, 18, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choi, H.; Jin, K.H.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Predicting cognitive decline with deep learning of brain metabolism and amyloid imaging. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 344, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hu, S.; Yang, C.; Luo, H. Current trends in blood biomarker detection and imaging for Alzheimer’s disease. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 210, 114278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huseby, C.J.; Delvaux, E.; Brokaw, D.L.; Coleman, P.D. Blood Transcript Biomarkers Selected by Machine Learning Algorithm Classify Neurodegenerative Diseases including Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chabrun, F.; Dieu, X.; Doudeau, N.; Gautier, J.; Luque-Paz, D.; Geneviève, F.; Ferré, M.; Mirebeau-Prunier, D.; Annweiler, C.; Reynier, P. Deep learning shows no morphological abnormalities in neutrophils in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit. 2021, 13, e12146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, J.; Qiu, W.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Guo, N.; Li, Q. Predicting Alzheimer’s disease by hierarchical graph convolution from positron emission tomography imaging. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 9–12 December 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vrahatis, A.G.; Skolariki, K.; Krokidis, M.G.; Lazaros, K.; Exarchos, T.P.; Vlamos, P. Revolutionizing the Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease through Non-Invasive Biomarkers: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning. Sensors 2023, 23, 4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Del Sol, A.; Malaspina, S.; Biasina, A.M. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias. Funct. Neurol. 2016, 31, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Illustration of AD progression, including the healthy brain, mild AD, and severe AD.
Figure 1. Illustration of AD progression, including the healthy brain, mild AD, and severe AD.
Chemproc 16 00025 g001
Figure 2. Different types of algorithms used for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease [14].
Figure 2. Different types of algorithms used for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease [14].
Chemproc 16 00025 g002
Table 1. Summary of various traditional biomarkers that are used for AD detection. Created by author and reference taken form [1,3,11,18].
Table 1. Summary of various traditional biomarkers that are used for AD detection. Created by author and reference taken form [1,3,11,18].
CategoryBiomarkerDescriptionKey Feature
MRIGrey matter volume Measures the volume of grey matter in the brain, indicating atrophyReflects structural changes in neurodegeneration
PETAmyloid-beta deposition Visualizes amyloid-beta plaques and tau tangles using radiotracersDirect detection of pathology
Amyloid-beta
(Aβ42)
Indicates amyloid plaque deposition in the brainMeasured using ELISA or mass spectrometry
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkersTotal tau
(t-tau)
Measures levels of total tau protein in CSFReflects neuronal damage and degeneration
Phosphorylated tau
(p-tau)
Measures levels of phosphorylated tau
protein in CSF
Indicates neurofibrillary degeneration
Amyloid-beta
(Aβ42 and Aβ40)
Measures levels of amyloid-beta in
blood plasma
Reflects amyloid plaque deposition
Blood-based biomarkersTau proteins
(t-tau and p-tau)
Measures levels of tau proteins in blood plasmaIndicates tau pathology
Neurofilament light
chain (NFL)
Measures levels of NFL in blood plasmaReflects neurodegeneration
Genetic biomarkersAPOE genotype
(APOE ε4)
Identifies presence of APOE ε4 allele, associated with increased genetic risk for ADDNA sequencing or genotyping assays, including PCR-based methods are used
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gupta, R.; Iftekhar, Z. Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: Enhancing Biomarker Analysis and Diagnostic Precision. Chem. Proc. 2024, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20206

AMA Style

Gupta R, Iftekhar Z. Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: Enhancing Biomarker Analysis and Diagnostic Precision. Chemistry Proceedings. 2024; 16(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gupta, Richa, and Zoya Iftekhar. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: Enhancing Biomarker Analysis and Diagnostic Precision" Chemistry Proceedings 16, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20206

APA Style

Gupta, R., & Iftekhar, Z. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: Enhancing Biomarker Analysis and Diagnostic Precision. Chemistry Proceedings, 16(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop